List of Prominent American Homosexual Bishops/Cardinals by Richard Sipe, Sexual Orientation and American Catholic Bishops

ADVERTISEMENT: @glorylatinchantmass.com chanted Dominican Rite Mass following the 1939 Dominican Rite Missal in tandem with the 1957 Suarez Dominican Chant Graduale is offered daily with Homily On Line from The Shrine of The Triumph of The Immaculate Heart of Mary, The Mother of God Theotokos and Midwife of The Mystical Body of Christ, Church Militant (Our Lady of Guadelupe, Our Lady of The Rosary, Nuestra Senora Buen Suceso de Purification, Our Lady of America, Our Lady of Lasselette , Our Lady of Fatima) The Lioness of Judah, Queen of Heaven, Mediatrix of All Graces with the Mass Intention praying for the Consecration of Russia by name in a public solemn ceremony by the Holy Father, the Vicar Christ, to The Immaculate Heart of Mary in union with all the Catholic Bishops of The World at the same time, the Mandate of The Sacred Heart of Jesus, and The Ultimate Triumph of The Immaculate Heart of Mary. Praying the Intercession and Merits from Heaven of St. Therese Lisieux, Patroness of All Russia, Co-Patron with St. Francis Xavier of the Missions, Blessed Hosanna de Cataro, Blessed Francis de Capillas, St. Catherine of Siena, Padre Pio, St. Margaret Mary Alacoque, The Blessed Apostles St. Peter and Paul, All The Saint and Blesseds , All Souls in Purgatory. Join daily in the Concelebration of The Holy Sacrifice of The Mass in Persona Christi Capite praying The Consecration of Russia as awaited by Our Lady of Fatima.

Although I disagree in principle with Richard Sipes, a former Benedictine monk who left the Catholic priesthood to marry, on Sipe’s distortion of  Roman Catholic moral teaching on sodomy, I do find his list factual. There are others, after the death of Sipe who are not on this important list.

Editor Fr. Christopher, O.P.

Chapter 4 – Bishops Too A QUESTION THAT JUST WON’T GO AWAY Do Bishops Have A Sexual Orientation? Aug 1, 2006 The question of sexual orientation is not just an American question or merely a Catholic concern let alone the sole focus of Roman Catholic clergy. But it is an important human question in which religion, and Catholicism in particular, ought to take a lead in addressing—because justice and human rights are at stake every bit as much in this area as in issues of racial, religious, and ethnic justice. One incident that brings the issue to mind is an Associated Press release on March 3, 2006 that notes that the publisher of a weekly newspaper in Cameroon (where homosexuality is illegal) was sentenced to four months in jail for publishing the names of people alleged to be gay or lesbian. (A Catholic Bishop was among those named.) The publication and subsequent trial led to a spike of anti-gay riots. So much for understanding and tolerance—and rationality for that matter! If a journalist publishes the names of people and identifies them as heterosexual is he also subject to the threat of incarceration? Sex Not A Private-Personal Matter For a Priest The declaration of sexuality for a priest is not a private matter. His promise of celibacy makes the promise of his sexual life an open book. Religious celibacy is a freely chosen, dynamic state, usually vowed (promised) that involves an honest and sustained attempt to live without direct sexual gratification, in order to serve others productively, for a spiritual motive. [Oxford Companion to Christian Thought] Catholic priests and religious are among an extremely small group of human beings who make their sexual practice—lack of it—public. The Church and the priest actually guarantee that clergy are sexually safe because a priest cannot be ordained or maintain his ministry if he is not celibate. Some theologians who do not know the essence and the constant church teaching about celibacy try to rationalize that celibacy means only to remain unmarried. That is not what canon law says: Clerics are obliged to observe perfect and perpetual continence for the sake of the kingdom of heaven and therefore are obliged to observe celibacy, which is a special gift of God, by which sacred ministers can adhere more easily to Christ with an undivided heart and can more freely dedicate themselves to the service of God and humankind. (Canon 277) Recently a priest-canon lawyer-from Catholic University of America argued, “In as much as celibacy refers to the obligation of remaining unmarried, no priest violates this obligation by sexual misconduct with minors or vulnerable adults. He does violate, however, his obligation of continence when he engages in any kind of sexual relationship.” This is an argument cut from the same cloth posed by a religious superior that made the claim that “two or three failures in a year do not constitute a violation of celibacy.” I responded at the time that his reasoning means that a priest may abuse three minors a year and still claim celibacy; or even more audaciously, a priest could impregnate two or three women in a year and still claim celibacy. A priest who was being investigated by the police protested that he was “celibate”—he had had sex with only 4 women and 10 men in the dozen years since his ordination. Another priest who was admitted to a hospital and diagnosed with AIDS claimed that such a conclusion was impossible since he was a “celibate.” The medical conclusion stood. This kind of reasoning is fallacious and insidious. Catholic lay people do not buy it; and bishops shouldn’t either. But even educated and sophisticated priests like Andrew Greeley fail to make the distinction between the nominal identification “celibate”—a person who takes the vow—and a person who is practicing sexual abstinence. Scientific surveys conducted in connection with the Los Angeles Times render a conclusion by Greeley that priests are the “happiest” men in America. Greeley calls this group “celibates,” but no real effort is expended to determine the actual pattern and practice of celibacy. Failures In Practice Certainly failures in the practice of celibacy are possible. Masturbation is the most common sexual “sin” that bishops and priests commit. Most lay people would grant clergy a dispensation for that failure even when they hold themselves to a higher standard. They will not go along with sexual relationships with minors. No excuses. That behavior does not fall under the rubric of celibacy, neither does an on-going relationship with a woman or man, nor does the use of pornography. A failure can be understood; a pattern of behavior is different. Forgiveness of a failure is not denied, but hypocrisy is intolerable. Tolerance for a human weakness in a priest or bishop does not demand that he expose each incidental sexual failing to public scrutiny, but that understanding does not extend to tolerance of a double life. Bishops or priests who have mistresses or male companions no longer qualify as “celibates,” no matter how understandable their behavior. Fairness The first step toward making celibacy more teachable and more practicable is to clarify the distinction between orientation and behavior. By demonizing orientation and confusing it with a “tendency toward evil” we obscure the importance of behavior. Reality is blurred just as it is when we fail to make the distinction between “celibacy” as a designation and celibacy as an actual practice. So at the heart of the matter are fairness in regard to sexual orientation and its clear operational distinction from sexual behavior. The Vatican is proceeding with its examination of Catholic seminaries in the United States. If representatives of an organization are going to demand a revelation of one’s orientation as a condition of employment, the ones demanding that condition should disclose theirs. The bishops and priests who are examining the seminaries with a mandate to eliminate homosexually oriented candidates from seminaries have a responsibility: In fairness the examiners must reveal their orientation to those examined. To do less makes a charade of the process and becomes a testament to hypocrisy. What is more the inquiry takes on the specter of a witch-hunt. Sexual orientation is not to be equated with behavior. Orientation is a given of nature. Behavior involves choice. Character and behavior count in determining one’s fitness for ministry. Orientation does not. The Unnecessary Hero A few heroic and honest priests are emerging who have declared their sexual orientation. That is heroic because it is not necessary, and at this time may open them up for ridicule. But that act of honest defiance is a step toward a normalization of the reality of sexuality that will not be eliminated from bias and hate until orientations are recognized as differences like the color of skin or eyes. No place is better suited to leading the way to clarity about sexual orientation than the Catholic Church. The reason? Catholic saints have demonstrated for centuries that homosexual orientation is not an impediment to service, holiness, or love. Neither is heterosexual orientation a guarantee of the same. The tradition of celibacy has been a service to humanity. Celibacy puts sexual orientations in their place—of no account as far as celibacy is concerned. Every sexual orientation is equally open to grace and redemption. Every orientation is capable of perversion. Members of the foreign press corps in Rome talk freely among themselves about the orientation of Popes: Pius XII (divided opinion), John XXIII, heterosexual, Paul VI, homosexual, John Paul II, heterosexual, and Benedict XVI, homosexual. They are not talking about behavior, and certainly not about any deviancy, vice or virtue. They are making informed observations about orientation—not about denigration or praise, or qualitative evaluations, strength or weakness. They are recognizing one of the inevitable facts of human existence—everyone has a predominant sexual orientation. The New Ways Ministry is a gay-positive ministry of advocacy, justice and reconciliation for lesbian and gay Catholics, families and friends. Since 1977 they have worked for justice and on behalf of lesbian and gay Catholics and reconciliation within the larger Christian and civil communities. I have known a number of straight priests who have aided and support the work of the ministry. Even they are overly careful not to identify orientation out side their own circle as if it were an insult or “crime”—not unlike Cameroon. Likewise, DignityUSA is the United States’ largest and most progressive organization of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender Catholics. They make great efforts to counter the dishonest, hate-filled, anti-gay rhetoric so prevalent inside and outside the Catholic Church. The organization and its members have a wide spectrum of Catholics who support them and the ideals they stand for. The group is sensitive to the dishonesty among many bishops, priests and lay Catholics about sex, celibacy and sexual orientation. They too, are violently, or at least cautiously resistant, to dealing openly with the issues of orientation in the clergy. They still think of such talk as “outing”—forced exposure of ones orientation—rather than open honest consideration of facts rather than accusations or insults. Until the Catholic Church leads the way to reason, justice, and honesty in all matters sexual the crisis in the Church and among the clergy will continue and prevail. Making clear the distinction between orientation and behavior is one necessary step in that process. This will promote the knowledge of the equality of sexual orientations and eliminate myths and misconceptions that hide evils and hypocrisies. I wish to reemphasize and reiterate what I have written previously in this series. (Sexual Orientation #1, #2, and #3) Vatican statements about sex are confused. This is clear in its Instruction on the Visitation of Seminaries where it talks about “deep-seated homosexual tendencies” and “transitional homosexuality” and its equation of sexual orientation with behavior. Cardinal Levada, now head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (formerly the Office of the Inquisition) on February 26, 2006 asked homosexually oriented priests to remain closeted. This suggestion is a travesty and only increases the opportunity and danger for good priests—heterosexual and homosexual—to carry on secret, non-celibate lives. Celibacy, not secrecy is the guide to sexual integrity. The Roman Catholic Church cannot re-establish its integrity or its credibility until it is clear about the distinction between sexual orientation and behavior; between homosexuality and pedophilia; and the real meaning of celibate practice. To neglect open and honest dialogue leaves the church and clergy open to ridicule, and worse, hypocrisy. I do not believe—in fact I emphatically reject—the Vatican statements that declare that homosexual orientation is an “objective disorder.” The Vatican’s reasoning is that the orientation itself “is a more or less strong tendency toward an intrinsic moral evil.” (Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, 10-1-86) This opinion has no scientific merit; it is not a position of “human reason illuminated by faith.” It is simply false. It is wrong-headed. Homosexual orientation is NOT an objective disorder. Likewise, this concept is theologically meaningless; it is insincere, untruthful, and perverted. The doctrine of Original Sin is sufficient to take care of all humans whatever their sexual orientation. I am not dealing here with homosexual acts. That is a different discussion—an important and essential dialogue, but it necessarily involves separate issues of the nature of human sexuality (scientific) free choice, the meanings of love and human relationships, the evolution of biology and morality. And more. In posting the following names it must be clear that there is no accusation of sexual activity on the part of anyone named. Listed here are opinions of orientation. Each name has been closely vetted based on some—usually public—facts that can lead to a reasonable opinion. A PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION OFSOME AMERICAN BISHOPS Person Location of Diocese Opinion of Orientation Cardinal Anthony  J. Bevilacqua Philadelphia, PA Heterosexual +Cardinal Joseph Bernardin Chicago, IL Homosexual / Bisexual Bishop Robert H. Brom San Diego, CA Homosexual +Cardinal John Cody Chicago, IL Heterosexual Bishop Edward P. Cullen Allentown, PA Heterosexual Bishop Paul V. Dudley Sioux Falls, SD Homosexual Bishop Thomas L. Dupre Springfield, MA Homosexual Cardinal Edward M. Egan New York, NY Homosexual +Joseph A. Ferrario Honolulu, HI Homosexual Archbishop Harry J. Flynn St. Paul/Minneapolis, MN Heterosexual / Bisexual +Bishop Louis E. Gelineau Providence, RI Homosexual +Bishop Francis Joseph Green Tucson, AZ Homosexual +Bishop Joseph Green Reno/Las Vegas NV Homosexual Archbishop Wilton D. Gregory Atlanta GA Homosexual +Bishop George H. Guilfoyle Camden, NJ Homosexual Bishop Joseph Hart Cheyenne, WY Homosexual Bishop Howard J. Hubbard Albany, NY Homosexual +Bishop Thomas Lyons Washington, D.C. Homosexual Bishop Robert N. Lynch St. Petersburg, FL Homosexual +Bishop Leo T. Maher San Diego, CA Heterosexual Bishop Richard J. Malone Portland, ME Heterosexual Archbishop Eugene A. Marino Atlanta, GA Heterosexual Cardinal Theodore McCarrick Newark, NJ Homosexual Bishop James F. McCarthy New York, NY Heterosexual +Bishop Emerson Moore New York, NY Homosexual + Bishop P. Francis Murphy Baltimore MD Heterosexual Archbishop John J. Myers Newark, NJ Homosexual Bishop Anthony J. O’Connell Palm Beach, FL Homosexual Archbishop John R. Quinn San Francisco, CA Homosexual +Bishop James S. Rausch Phoenix, AZ Homosexual Bishop Frank J. Rodimer Paterson, NJ Homosexual Bishop George E. Rueger Worcester, MA Homosexual Bishop Daniel L. Ryan Springfield, IL Homosexual Archbishop Robert  Sanchez Santa Fe, NM Heterosexual Bishop Lawrence D. Soens Sioux City, IA Homosexual +Cardinal Francis Spellman New York, NY Homosexual Cardinal J. Francis Stafford Denver CO Homosexual Bishop Joseph R.. Sullivan Baton Rouge, LA Homosexual Bishop J. Keith Symons Palm Beach, FL Homosexual Archbishop Rembert G. Weakland Milwaukee, WI Homosexual +Bishop Lawrence H. Welsh Spokane, WA Homosexual Bishop J. Kendrick Williams Lexington, KY Homosexual +Cardinal John Wright Pittsburgh, PA Homosexual Bishop G. Patrick Ziemann Santa Rosa, CA Homosexual