One of the most frequented blogs on my Holytransparency.wordpress.com for months is entitled, “The Michael Voris Deception.” In the Vortex, Michael Voris says many courageous and necessary things as self appointed “Defensor Fidei” in opposition to “wicked and faithless” Cardinals, Bishops, Priests, and Religious as well as Lay People. But not Popes and anti-popes like “St”. John XXIII, “St.” JPII, Pope Emeritus Benedict, and Francis. “And this is the greatest treason to do the right thing for the wrong reason.” As a member of secret society religious cult of of personality, Opus Dei, Michael Voris has been unwilling to criticize The Pope (and warns Catholics passionately not to take the Modernist “Church of Nice” bait to do so, most especially “Pope Emeritus Benedict” and now Francis. So the following Vortex- A Disgrace to the Chair of Peter, though correcting popular perceptions by Catholics and Non Catholics of the Pope as media celebrity cult figure instilled during the 25 year rock star jet setter papacy of JPII, is nonetheless most deceptive on Voris’ part. Why?
Michael Voris has never spoken the truth, is silent about Benedict’s 25 year cover up of JPII’s profoundly satanic relationship with Fr. Maciel Degolado the criminal master mind and spiritual father of Sinaloa Federation Cartel. Nor about Cardinal Ratzinger’s global cover up of clerical child rape, the skeletons in the closet of which for the world’s Cardinal Archbishops’ assured the in Houston, Texas indicted Cardinal Ratzinger C.C.D head would be elected Pope to assure his diplomatic immunity as Absolute Monarch of the Vatican City State for his crimes of cover up and clerical crimes against child world wide by Cardinals like Dinardo and Wuerl , Joseph Ratzinger covered up. Not to mention Fr. Maciel’s invention of child sex slaving for undocumented workers involving tens of thousands of children from Mexico and Central America sold in cantinas from Houston to Chicago. The Michael Voris Deception is he cover’s up the crimes of Pope’s because they are the Pope and Neoconservative .
Voris covers up the true reason Benedict made himself “Emeritus.” Benedict was forced to leave office, if that is what he actually did, not because of his cover up of global child rape through the church, but because the Chase Vatican Bank-as ever a Rothschild front-would no longer allow Benedict who sought to “reform” the Mexican/ Columbian money laundering mega bank “to buy and sell” as Head of the Vatican City State. The Rothschild’s literally cut off the cash supply to the Vatican City ATM’s and everything else. Benedict was not forced out because of the evil cover ups he did- those were keeping bank business-especially Fr. Degolado’s Legion of Christ account- going at a rate of hundreds of billions of dollars, but because of the good things Benedict was trying to do, like the Latin Mass indult, dismissing Fr. Maciel, and reforming the Chase Vatican Bank, as well as his opposition, though “queer as a three dollar bill himself” to homosexuality and especially “same sex marriage”. All of this ran counter to the Goldman Sachs’ (Rothschild) Vatican Illuminati agenda. Time for plan B, Francis, runner up in 2013 to Benedict.
Voris does not acknowlege that Benedict-Theologian Joseph Ratzinger- was and is a Modernist theologian of the same genre as Hans Urs Von Bathasar and Henre de Lubac, Karl Rahner. Somehow via Fr. Joe Fessio’s Ignatius Press, Modernist Theologians like the above became branded under the regime of JPII (a Modernist Theologian himself- The Theology of the Body) and Cardinal Ratzinger as “Conservative,” or rather Neo Conservative. So called “Conservative Catholics” reacting against post Vatican II, like Wuerl, and Dinardo, certainly JPII and Benedict and Francis are “Neo Conservative” in that they are complete geo political puppets of Rothschild Zionist NWO generals be it Knight of Malta Henry Kissinger who advised Pope Benedict, or JPII svengali Zbigniew Brzezinski who manipulated JPII through having him introduced at a Washington party to a married cute petite Polish American blond who help JPII write “The Acting Person,” and inspired him to compose the sexually creepy, gnostic “Theology of the Body” which forms the religious/philosophical basis for same sex marriage in the mind of Francis, as well as the “Gay Lobby” Vatican Illuminati at the recent Synod on the Family.
The truth being said, which the Michael Voris Deception covers up, Pope “Emeritus” Benedict is by far with “St. John XXIII,” “St.” JPII, and anti pope Francis the greatest disgracers to the Chair of Peter in Church History. Like teenager Pope Benedict IX, Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI was a homosexual Pope, and as a teenager an active member of the very homosexual Hitler Youth. Pope Benedict is in a long term homosexual relationship with his Secretary “Gorgeous George,” just like JPII was in a hetero sexual relationship with Zibignew’s petite Polish blond, it does not matter if they did the dirty as far as the disgracing the Chair of Peter is concerned. Both affairs are common knowledge in the Vatican and the Italian Parliament. Both affairs were used as always to betray an office held, and through emotional blackmail serve the end of Vatican Illuminati, and the goal of the Alta Vendita: So disgrace the papacy by an anti pope who confuses with scandal simple believers and non believers alike, declaring that religion is politics that no one will listen to future popes ever again.
Michael Voris is a disgracer of the Chair of Peter in portraying Benedict as “Pope Emeritus,” an assault in the mind of the Faithful-simple believers- on the true nature of the Chair of Peter and the Vicar of Christ. You can not have two Popes at once, the history of the Church is clear. Ignoring two thousand years of Church History, MichaelVoris who fancies himself as “more Catholic than the Pope” constantly espouses as a self styled voice of apostolic orthodoxy the belief that Benedict is “Pope Emeritus.” “Pope Emeritus” BS plays into the goal of the Vatican Illuminati/Alta Vendita to so disgrace the Chair of Peter through Benedict and his chosen successor Francis that no one, Catholic or not, liberal and conservation, pro or contra will listen to the Pope whenever, or whatever he speaks. With Benedict and Francis and Michael Voris enabling, mission accomplished!
Voris scandalizes “simple believers” telling them that they do not have to listen to a Pope- again Voris assumes that Francis is Pope as he assumes that Benedict is Pope Emeritus- you can’t have one without the other- when it comes to immigration issues, Laudato Si -an apostolic exortation, or birth control, is of course playing right into the hands of centuries old Counsels of the Alta Vendita- the Vatican Illuminati- to so discredit the office of the Papacy by anti-popes- both “Pope Emeritus” and Francis are anti-popes- that no one will listen to any pope again about anything. The point is not that Francis, or Benedict as Pope should be listened to as Modernists, or not listened to. The point is: The Pope is the Vicar of Christ. His legate, His legal representative-it is a moral office that ends with death, or resignation period. There is no such animal as “Pope Emeritus.” If any man holding the office, even validly elected Pope (which Francis may not have been) in anyway confuses Church Teaching in faith and morals in the minds of simple believers (scandal) and thus contradicts Church Teaching in faith and morals, that man ceases to be Pope. As St. Callixtus states “A Pope who publically destroys the Church must be resisted.” The Michael Voris’ Deception is to do the contrary in regard to Pope Emeritus Bendict and his chosen successor anti pope Francis. Voris does not resist a pope who has publicly destroyed The Church, like Benedict and Francis are doing, but enabled both to do so. Michael Voris, Opus Dei, an arm of the Vatican Illuminati is acting knowingly, or unknowingly to bring about the stated goal of the Vatican Illuminati- to make the Chair of Peter so discredited by scandal and disgrace that no one will listen to the Pope, any Pope.
Only Mary, Our Lady of Fatima can help us!
A DISGRACE TO THE CHAIR OF PETER
The Church belongs to Almighty God, not to the shepherds.
February 23, 2016 280 Comments
DOWNLOAD THE AUDIO
At exactly 4:49 p.m. Rome time, February 12,1931, a remarkable thing happened. For the first time in history, a mass audience actually was able to audibly hear with their own ears the actual voice of the Holy Father — less than a hundred years ago in a 2000-year-old Church. The very first radio broadcast, invented by Italian scientist Guglielmo Marconi, went out over the airwaves with the voice coming from the mouth of Pope Pius XI. Things were about to change forever.
Fifty years earlier in 1870, the Church had officially announced the dogma of papal infallibility at Vatican I. The dogmatic announcement was a source of some concern — and not just by enemies of the Church.
Before he died 20 years after Vatican I and 30 years before that first radio broadcast, Bd. John Henry Newman looked down the road and worried that regular Catholics would misconstrue the dogmatic pronouncement and begin to assign, in their minds, an authority to the Pope that he does not possess: common infallibility.
After the radio broadcast, a potential dangerous mix could now form in the minds of regular faithful. The mix was that everything any Pope said was held as infallible, and because of technology, we would now be able to actually hear everything the Pope said.
We have arrived at that point in the Church’s history. Too many Catholics, as well as enemies of the Church, have in their minds that whatever issues from the mouth of the Pope enjoys an air of infallibility, or near infallibility. The fact that a Pope could say something wrong or be misinformed simply doesn’t occur to them.
This also relates to the pious but wrongheaded idea that whoever steps out onto the loggia after being elected Pope was chosen by the Holy Spirit. That’s not even close to correct.
The Holy Spirit is invoked and prayed to to supply the grace to elect the Pope He wills to be elected, but the individual cardinals in conclave are free to conform themselves to that grace, reject it or fail to see it. That applies to every one of us in our daily lives. The Holy Spirit does not choose the Pope. The Holy Spirit protects the office from binding the consciences of the faithful to error — but He does not choose the Pope. The cardinals sitting in conclave might conform themselves to His grace and choose whom He wants — but then again, may not.
Another trip down history is helpful here. In 1032, teenager Benedict IX was elected to the papacy. This was during the height of one of the most scandalous times in the Church, when Roman families were buying and selling the papacy, selecting friends as political payoff, etc. Now, Benedict is never accused of altering doctrine or making heretical statements — that’s true. But he was called “a disgrace to the chair of Peter” in the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia.
He was suspected of being the first homosexual Pope, and 50 years after his reign, a successor Pope wrote of his “rapes and murders.” A hundred years earlier, during this same long-lasting period of scandal, an 18-year-old was elected to the papacy: John XII. Again, no official heresy, but an extremely dissolute life.
Before John XII, there was 20-year-old John XI, who may have been fathered by a previous Pope. These popes, who were practically children, have never been accused of heresy, but then again, from their extremely slim number of writings, decrees and promulgations, it’s difficult to know what they were saying in their non-official capacities. Can you imagine what the headlines would have been if there was conventional and social media in the 10th century?
Imagine: a 20-year-old rapist, homosexual murderer — who is also the Pope — flying back to Rome when an unbelieving reporter pops a question at him about “gay rights” or any other sexual proclivity. For that fact, imagine what almost any teenager would answer to any question. There’s a reason the expression developed that children should be seen and not heard.
But this problem of what a man (or boy) who also happens to be Pope thinks has only become a problem in the past 50 years, for the simple reason that there was no real opportunity in centuries past for his private ruminations to be aired.
Now it’s non-stop. Catholics have gone from never hearing from their popes to hearing too much. A distinction needs to be made between Joseph Ratzinger and Pope Benedict. A distinction has to be made between Jorge Bergoglio and Pope Francis.
Men in the office of Pope can be wrong. That shouldn’t be a headline to Catholics — but it is. Popes can be wrong; not every word that falls from the lips of a Pope is full of grace. It’s not Catholic to hang on every utterance of the Pope as though it is divinely inspired.
It absolutely depends on the time, place and circumstances of what he’s saying and how he’s intending it, and a press conference has zero magisterial weight — even if the Pope himself says something.
As an aside, we’ve said before multiple times on “the Vortex”: Why should reporters even be allowed to pop questions at the Pope, any Pope? Always a bad idea. What the Pope says about climate change has no magisterial weight. What he says about economic systems in their detail has no magisterial weight. What he says about immigration policy in detail has no magisterial weight. And certainly what he says in a press conference has no magisterial weight.
But everyone — friend and enemies — are willing to respond to it like it is magisterial. Did you hear what the Pope said? Referring to Donald Trump as not Christian has no magisterial weight.
Jorge Bergoglio can easily misspeak, especially if he’s conflating his thoughts with what amounts to a hypothetical theological discussion point about nuns in the Congo — which no one can find any actual evidence of — and even if they did, it was before the issuance of “Humanae Vitae,” which dealt primarily with the pill, which was a whole new thing at the time.
Every papal word is not full of grace, and no authentic Catholic has ever approached the Pope that way even back to St. Paul when he had to challenge Peter about how he was treating the Gentile converts. The Church belongs to Jesus Christ — not popes, not bishops, not you, not me. None of this happens without the permission of the Lord of history. We must suffer as He did — even if that suffering comes at the hands of His shepherds.
It is absurd to think that the men who are popes are perfect in their understandings, thoughts and so forth. The problem today is they express these thoughts out loud in front of cameras and microphones.
It has become, since really the papacy of Pope St. John Paul II, a cult of the Pope, driven by media, which turns into a feeding frenzy from every side when this Pope or any future Pope says or will say anything off the top of his head that turns out to be wrong, misinformed and the like.
This is the danger of a media-driven papacy: It can be manipulated by those who control the media and those in the Church who want to exploit it. They want the impression to exist that everything a Pope says is Catholic dogma so that when the man who is Pope misspeaks or is wrong, they can pounce on it and capitalize on it.
Think of the international uproar that occurred when Pope Benedict was trying to make a point about moral theology during an interview and he used the example of condom use in preventing AIDS. Very imprudent example, and the headlines went nuts.
Popes make mistakes. They have private thoughts that are simply wrong, not well thought out, a result of poor misunderstanding of some theological point, even badly informed about history.
The Pope’s comments about Congo nuns being allowed to take the pill seem to have no basis in reality whatsoever, because no one, repeat no one, can find any reference whatsoever that Pope Paul VI — or more accurately, even Pope St. John XXIII — ever did this.
It is a well-established non-history — so that alone shows that a Pope can be wrong if he starts quoting non-history to back up a poorly thought out answer to a reporter’s shotgun question on a plane.
But the point is: No Catholic can or should be surprised by this. It is we with our poor understanding of the office of Pope who need to break this pattern of errant thought or approach to the successor of St. Peter.
Again, imagine what would come out of the mouth of teenage popes a thousand years ago who were raping and sodomizing and murdering, if they were standing in front of a microphone and were asked some random question. For the first 1900 years, we were spared. From here on out, we are on notice.