Shield your donations from being used to cover up child sexual abuse and diocesan lawyers’ fees, Here’s How!

 

A Call to Arms: Only Donate With ‘Restricted Purpose,’ or Not at All

 

Shield your donations from being used to cover up child sexual abuse and diocesan lawyers’ fees

You are not signed in as a Premium user; we rely on Premium users to support our news reporting. Sign in or Sign up today!

By Rev. Michael X., J.C.L.

“Money is power, and rare are the heads that can withstand the possession of great power.” – Benjamin Disraeli

For almost two decades now, the lay faithful of the Roman Catholic Church in America have been buffeted back and forth by endless hurricanes of betrayal, deception and breach of trust by those men whom they were told by their bishops were called by Christ, Our Savior, to represent Him on Earth and provide true means for them to access salvation.

Instead, now the faithful are waking up to the evermore sobering realization that not only have their bishops given them too many rotten apples to serve as their pastors, but indeed that their bishops and even cardinals (McCarrick, Wuerl, etc.) have deliberately enabled and covered up the putrid crimes of so many Judases in their midst. The egregious failures of the bishops are statistically leading more and more faithful to desperation, impelling them to throw up their hands to the Lord, asking Him, “Will this ever stop?” The answer is yes, but only if you help the Church help you. It’s called the Code of Canon Law (CIC), used together with the power of the purse.

The Catholic Church has always taught that She has the inherent right, independently of any secular power, to acquire and use temporal goods such as money and real estate in pursuit of its proper objectives, so that She, in turn, may fulfill Our Lord’s divine mandate that the faithful be provided with true doctrine and divine worship (cf. canon 1254 CIC). This command, however, can only be fulfilled if the Church provides fitting support for the clerical ministers of the Church.
What the ordinary lay faithful of the Church do not realize, however, is that if they do not attach what is called in canon law a “specified purpose” to their financial donations placed in the collection basket, their bishop can canonically and legally do anything he wants with their money. Such “unrestricted” donations constitute the vast majority of offerings given to every parish, diocese, religious order, priest, bishop, cardinal and even pope.

The failings of our episcopal leadership in many ways have been – and I do not write this lightly – enabled unwittingly by the lay faithful who, just like those who feed the needs of drug addicts to their destruction, have given bishops carte blanche to continue behaving very, very, very badly with their financial offerings.

One needs only think of Cdl. Roger Mahony of Los Angeles easily writing checks totaling almost $800 million to abuse victims, or the then-bishop of Pittsburgh, now cardinal, Donald Wuerl of Washington, D.C. being “open” to the creation of a “slush fund, under-table” (cf. 40th Statewide Investigating Grand Jury Report, p. 249) of $180,000, in all appearances to keep a diabolical child predator of a priest from publicly exposing other clerics continuing to work evil against minors.

Donations given for a specified purpose in the collection basket may only be used for the purpose specified.Tweet

The general principle regarding donations is that any offering given by a faithful to his or her parish or diocese is presumed in canon law to have been given in an unrestricted manner (cf. can. 1267, § 1 CIC). Unless the Parish is incorporated, this means that the diocesan bishop can use the donation for practically anything he wants, provided it’s for some diocese-related use.

The exception to this rule is the norm of canon 1267, § 3 CIC: “Offerings given by the faithful for a specified purpose may be used only for that purpose.”

In layman’s terms, this means that donations given for a specified purpose in the collection basket may only be used for the purpose specified. Without such specified purpose being communicated to the parish or diocese, there is absolutely no way for a donor to prevent his donation being used as a “payout” or settlement fee to an alleged sex abuse victim, legal fee for the increasing numbers of premium-rate civil attorneys and whole law firms being hired by bishops across the country to protect their proverbial asses from getting thrown into jail.

With all due respect, the lay faithful shouldn’t, canonically or morally, have to pay for their bishops’ incompetence — if not malfeasance — relating to child sex abuse committed by priests under their watch unless, under one respect, the faithful are negligent themselves by failing to restrict the purpose of their donation.

How does a faithful show that his or her donation was made with “specified purpose”? According to can. 1526, § 1 CIC, “Onus probandi incumbit ei qui asserit,” translated: “The burden of proof rests upon the person who makes an allegation.” Therefore, there is a patent need for a donor, who wants to protect his donation from being used for an ulterior purpose, to prove the specified purpose attached to his offering.

For example, if a donor wanted to ensure that his offering would only be used to pay his parish’s gas bill, the following are ways by which he may prove his restrictive donative intent:

  • Writing “Restricted Purpose Donation: Only for Gas Bill” in the memo section on the front of the check used for donation. The same can be written on the check’s back.
  • Letter accompanying check, duly signed, dated, with return address of donor, referencing the check number, stating, “Restricted Purpose Donation: Only for Gas Bill.”
  • Bank wire with “Restricted Purpose Donation: Only for Gas Bill” diligently written by a bank officer in “memo” or “reference” section of wire order.

In short, there is a need for absolute clarity on the part of the donor. A photocopy of the donation and any accompanying letter needs to be kept for record-keeping purposes.

The beauty of restricted-purpose donations is that under canon law, an obligation of added accountability is also triggered pursuant to the norm of can. 1287, § 3 CIC: “Administrators are to render accounts to the faithful concerning the goods they have given to the Church, in accordance with the norms to be laid down by particular law.”

This means that, upon request made of the parish or diocese, every lay faithful donor who has made donations with restricted purpose, per can. 1267, § 3 CIC, has a right to confirmation in writing that his donation was in fact used for the restricted purpose he intended and none other.

As Thomas Fuller once wrote, “Money is the sinew of love as well as war.” The lay faithful find themselves in a time of war that as part of the Church Militant they needs must recognize as having to be fought with every means at their disposal.

This includes legitimate weaponization of their wallet and judicious exercise of the power of the purse if ordinary faithful are to avoid cooperating in the evil of bishops who will most assuredly continue using unrestricted donations of the faithful to cover up their negligence in the handling of cases of abuse of minors under their spiritual care.

For faithful to continue to give unrestricted donations to bishops of the Catholic Church, account taken of the latest revelations hitting the press, is nothing less than enabling them to continue to abuse their ecclesiastical power if not commit the gravest negligence in the exercise of their office, to the most grievous detriment of the Catholic Church.

Advertisements

Cardinal Dinardo, just Resign while you still can!

Cardinal Dinardo hated Monsignor Rossi and vice versa for demanding as Chancellor Dinardo- a 24/7 chain smoker which probably contributed to Dinardo’s recent stroke,  not be allowed to smoke in the Chancellery Office of Archdiocese of Galveston/Houston  when Dinardo was a deeply resented by Fiorenza and his golden boy Rossi, auxiliary Bishop with right of succession to previous homo collective Archbishop “Lying Joe” Firenza.  Dinardo for purely reasons of revenge jumped on the initial charges against Rossi to eventually expel Rossi from the Arch Diocese into the Diocese of Beaumont whose current Bishop was three years ago convicted criminally of enabling a child molesting priest under his supervision as bishop of Beaumont.  It is beyond ironic that now Dinardo has reversed his original course in this case, doing the right thing for the wrong reason-revenge on Rossi for not allowing him to smoke at the chancellery to publicly claim in his own defense “This was consensual sexual contact by two adults.”  LOL!

Lyin Joe was appointed in the fateful year of 1979, a long with Joseph Bernadin, and Roger Mahoney,  by Non Saint, Non Pope JPII, protector of Sinaloa Federation Cartel criminal master mind and co-founder with Carlos Slim Helu, Fr. Maciel Macial Degolado.  Maciel through his front company The Legionaries of Christ via Chase/Vatican Bank account of the Legionaries of Christ money laundered in the hundreds of billions of religious contributions from Carlos Slim SFC and Curso CEO gleaned from Maciel’s innovation of global child sex slave trafficking for the politically and economically dispossessed and not just economic and government elites,  along the I-10 and I-59/69 in cantinas with trafficking weigh stations like the firebombed by a resurgent rival Mafia Family/ New Orleans, Southwest Inn in Houston,  and “The Hideaway,”  with a faux bicycle company front, Tilman Fertitta Syndicate/ SFC child sex slave trafficking logistically serviced just two blocks away by Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast I-45, who Dinardo authorized as Bishop/ Copus Sol, the sale of a white elephant bank property that the Archdiocese of Galveston/Houston had a share, of a private bank in the form of a gigantic cash register, whose CEO, a major share holder along with Dinardo as Bishop/Corpus Sol in the bank,  was KC. The Hideaway is used as well for Raves for Tilman Fertitta University of Houston controlled fraternities.

SFC Drugs, AK-47’s from the Port of Houston, child sex slave trafficking weigh stations are protected under the auspices of Tilman Fertitta’s Galveston Free State “Velvet Glove” Sam Maceo legacy  RICO 100rd Club protection racket control of the TDPS Highway Patrol police hours and arrests on the I-10 and I-69,  through the 290 corridor I-10- at the 12,000 Sq. Ft. KC Hall in Hempstead, Tx  KC Hal weigh station controlled by  Joe Kuciembe where Raves are sponsored by the KC offering alcohol, drugs, and prostitution to Texas A+M Prairie View students, as well as the firebombed KC Hall like the Southwest Inn, as well as the KC weigh station in College Bryan Station likewise firebombed by a resurgent Mafia rival.  Tilman’s syndicate and the SFC is not what it used to be prior to Benedict solely under pressure from the secular Mexican Press, dismissing Maciel as head of the Legionaries of Christ and Helu- a Marronite Catholic Lebanese- on the wrong side of the Rotheschild’s (owners of the Vatican Bank) in backing Assad in Syria in the taking back of the stolen Golan Heights that Is R Hell steals 40% of their fresh water from the Syrian People.

Excusing Priestly Sexual Misconduct as ‘Consensual’

News: US News

by Church Militant  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  June 6, 2019    50 Comments

Houston’s Cdl. Daniel DiNardo downplaying monsignor’s abuse of trust and power

You are not signed in as a Premium user; we rely on Premium users to support our news reporting. Sign in or Sign up today!

By Martina Moyski

The Catholic hierarchy’s use of the “consensual sex” card to justify priestly misconduct has been thrown on the table once again, this time after a Texas woman was taken advantage of emotionally, spiritually and physically by a priest serving as her spiritual counselor.

Msgr. Frank Rossi

Laura Pontikes, a 55-year-old construction executive in Texas, had been suffering from long-term depression and problems in her marriage when she sought help from Msgr. Frank Rossi, then-vicar general and deputy to Cdl. Daniel DiNardo in the Galveston-Houston Archdiocese. Pontikes first met Rossi in the confessional in 2007. 

Instead of receiving spiritual counseling, Pontikes was lured into an ongoing sexual relationship with Rossi.Tweet

Instead of receiving spiritual counseling, Pontikes was lured into an ongoing sexual relationship with Rossi, who characterized it as “blessed by God.” Rossi said their “holy touches” were encouraged by St. Paul. Emails turned over to the archdiocese and Associated Press (AP) show that Rossi kept hearing Pontikes’ confessions and counseled her husband on problems in their marriage — even as he was having a sexual affair with his wife.

He took a woman that went into a church truly looking for God, and he took me for himself,” Pontikes told AP.

Pontikes reported Rossi’s behavior to DiNardo in April 2016, saying Rossi had taken advantage of her vulnerability stemming from problems in her marriage and business in order to manipulate her into a sexual relationship.

Cdl. Daniel DiNardo’s Response

Initially DiNardo praised Pontikes for coming forward to report the incident and described her as a “victim.” DiNardo assured Pontikes that Rossi would never be a pastor or counsel women again.

He sent Rossi away to treatment, and never put the priest back into active ministry in his archdiocese. But Rossi transferred to the neighboring Beaumont diocese, where DiNardo gave him a clean bill of health to the bishop of Beaumont, failing to mention Rossi’s sexual misconduct with Pontikes.

DiNardo has since reneged on his support of Pontikes and is now maintaining that the relationship was “consensual” and that comments attributed to DiNardo are “an absolute fabrication.”

The couple have denied that they fabricated quotes and have demanded $10 million, saying they are being dismissed the way the Church dismisses other victims.

Pontikes’ husband confronted the cardinal about his about-faceAccording to AP, DiNardo warned the Pontikes that “the archdiocese would respond aggressively to any legal challenge — and that the fallout would hurt their family and business.”

It was announced this week that Rossi has been placed on “temporary administrative leave” pending the outcome of a previously undisclosed criminal sexual misconduct investigation launched by Houston police in August. This move by the archdiocese was made on Tuesday, after the AP alerted the U.S. Catholic Church that it was preparing a story involving Rossi.

‘Consent’ in Canon Law vs. ‘Consent’ in Civil Law

The criminal sexual misconduct investigation brings questions oconsent in priest-parishioner relationships to the fore. Texas civil law is stricter than Catholic canon law regarding consent.

According to Texas law, “A fiduciary is required to put the wellbeing and interest of the person for whom they are responsible above their individual interests. Texas law, above all, requires exceptional loyalty from a fiduciary and it also inflicts harsh punishments against those that breach their fiduciary roles.” 

It goes on, “even if the violation is not deliberate, the violator has to account for his or her actions.”

Pontikes is now seeking the recourse she could not find under canon law instead under civil law.

The argument that archdioceses are not liable for “consensual sex” between a priest and another adult has become the go-to defense in dioceses.

Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago was vocal in pushing the “consensual sex” argument at November’s Baltimore bishops’ meeting, when it was proposed that the definition of “vulnerable adults” be expanded to include regular adults. 

Cardinal Kevin Farrell, when he headed the diocese of the Dallas, Texas, used the same argument in dismissing claims brought by an adult male who lodged an accusation against Fr. Timothy Heines.

When law enforcement launched a criminal investigation against Fr. Juan Garcia Castillo in San Diego after a seminarian accused him of sexually groping him, the diocese, headed by gay-friendly Bp. Robert McElroy, commented, “We need to see what happens to the criminal case because the issue of consent is so important and if it’s not clear, we wait for that to get made clear.”

Ignoring the objective power differential between priests and those in their care — whether junior priests, seminarians, parishioners or acquaintances — and the requisite abuse of power in a sexual relationship between the two parties, prelates have often justified sexual misconduct by using the “consensual sex between adults” defense, thus shielding themselves and their dioceses from liability,

According to the Daily Caller, “The claim that sexual acts performed between adult seminarians and clergy, as in the case of former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, were consensual is questionable at best, given the legal definition of sexual harassment and the inherent power dynamic between people in different positions of church hierarchy.”

A fiduciary is required to put the wellbeing and interest of the person for whom they are responsible above their individual interests. Tweet

DiNardo’s mishandling of the Pontikes’ case raises farther-reaching questions for the Church in the context of the #MeToo movement, when powerful men and institutions are being held more publicly accountable for sex abuse and cover-ups, even as the Catholic Church seems to hold its own clergy to a lesser standard. 

DiNardo’s previous alleged mishandlings, including not doing enough to stop a priest under his supervision who is currently being charged with two counts of indecency with a child that occurred in 1998 and 2000, may also receive renewed scrutiny in light of the Pontikes’ affair.

“I want my church to stand up in support of victims,” Pontikes has said. So far, indications are that the church protects and supports the perpetrators of sex abuse crimes and not the victims.

 

Excusing Priestly Sexual Misconduct as ‘Consensual’

News: US News

by Church Militant  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  June 6, 2019    50 Comments

Houston’s Cdl. Daniel DiNardo downplaying monsignor’s abuse of trust and power

You are not signed in as a Premium user; we rely on Premium users to support our news reporting. Sign in or Sign up today!

By Martina Moyski

The Catholic hierarchy’s use of the “consensual sex” card to justify priestly misconduct has been thrown on the table once again, this time after a Texas woman was taken advantage of emotionally, spiritually and physically by a priest serving as her spiritual counselor.

Msgr. Frank Rossi

Laura Pontikes, a 55-year-old construction executive in Texas, had been suffering from long-term depression and problems in her marriage when she sought help from Msgr. Frank Rossi, then-vicar general and deputy to Cdl. Daniel DiNardo in the Galveston-Houston Archdiocese. Pontikes first met Rossi in the confessional in 2007. 

Instead of receiving spiritual counseling, Pontikes was lured into an ongoing sexual relationship with Rossi.Tweet

Instead of receiving spiritual counseling, Pontikes was lured into an ongoing sexual relationship with Rossi, who characterized it as “blessed by God.” Rossi said their “holy touches” were encouraged by St. Paul. Emails turned over to the archdiocese and Associated Press (AP) show that Rossi kept hearing Pontikes’ confessions and counseled her husband on problems in their marriage — even as he was having a sexual affair with his wife.

He took a woman that went into a church truly looking for God, and he took me for himself,” Pontikes told AP.

Pontikes reported Rossi’s behavior to DiNardo in April 2016, saying Rossi had taken advantage of her vulnerability stemming from problems in her marriage and business in order to manipulate her into a sexual relationship.

Cdl. Daniel DiNardo’s Response

Initially DiNardo praised Pontikes for coming forward to report the incident and described her as a “victim.” DiNardo assured Pontikes that Rossi would never be a pastor or counsel women again.

He sent Rossi away to treatment, and never put the priest back into active ministry in his archdiocese. But Rossi transferred to the neighboring Beaumont diocese, where DiNardo gave him a clean bill of health to the bishop of Beaumont, failing to mention Rossi’s sexual misconduct with Pontikes.

DiNardo has since reneged on his support of Pontikes and is now maintaining that the relationship was “consensual” and that comments attributed to DiNardo are “an absolute fabrication.”

The couple have denied that they fabricated quotes and have demanded $10 million, saying they are being dismissed the way the Church dismisses other victims.

Pontikes’ husband confronted the cardinal about his about-faceAccording to AP, DiNardo warned the Pontikes that “the archdiocese would respond aggressively to any legal challenge — and that the fallout would hurt their family and business.”

It was announced this week that Rossi has been placed on “temporary administrative leave” pending the outcome of a previously undisclosed criminal sexual misconduct investigation launched by Houston police in August. This move by the archdiocese was made on Tuesday, after the AP alerted the U.S. Catholic Church that it was preparing a story involving Rossi.

‘Consent’ in Canon Law vs. ‘Consent’ in Civil Law

The criminal sexual misconduct investigation brings questions oconsent in priest-parishioner relationships to the fore. Texas civil law is stricter than Catholic canon law regarding consent.

According to Texas law, “A fiduciary is required to put the wellbeing and interest of the person for whom they are responsible above their individual interests. Texas law, above all, requires exceptional loyalty from a fiduciary and it also inflicts harsh punishments against those that breach their fiduciary roles.” 

It goes on, “even if the violation is not deliberate, the violator has to account for his or her actions.”

Pontikes is now seeking the recourse she could not find under canon law instead under civil law.

The argument that archdioceses are not liable for “consensual sex” between a priest and another adult has become the go-to defense in dioceses.

Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago was vocal in pushing the “consensual sex” argument at November’s Baltimore bishops’ meeting, when it was proposed that the definition of “vulnerable adults” be expanded to include regular adults. 

Cardinal Kevin Farrell, when he headed the diocese of the Dallas, Texas, used the same argument in dismissing claims brought by an adult male who lodged an accusation against Fr. Timothy Heines.

When law enforcement launched a criminal investigation against Fr. Juan Garcia Castillo in San Diego after a seminarian accused him of sexually groping him, the diocese, headed by gay-friendly Bp. Robert McElroy, commented, “We need to see what happens to the criminal case because the issue of consent is so important and if it’s not clear, we wait for that to get made clear.”

Ignoring the objective power differential between priests and those in their care — whether junior priests, seminarians, parishioners or acquaintances — and the requisite abuse of power in a sexual relationship between the two parties, prelates have often justified sexual misconduct by using the “consensual sex between adults” defense, thus shielding themselves and their dioceses from liability,

According to the Daily Caller, “The claim that sexual acts performed between adult seminarians and clergy, as in the case of former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, were consensual is questionable at best, given the legal definition of sexual harassment and the inherent power dynamic between people in different positions of church hierarchy.”

A fiduciary is required to put the wellbeing and interest of the person for whom they are responsible above their individual interests. Tweet

DiNardo’s mishandling of the Pontikes’ case raises farther-reaching questions for the Church in the context of the #MeToo movement, when powerful men and institutions are being held more publicly accountable for sex abuse and cover-ups, even as the Catholic Church seems to hold its own clergy to a lesser standard. 

DiNardo’s previous alleged mishandlings, including not doing enough to stop a priest under his supervision who is currently being charged with two counts of indecency with a child that occurred in 1998 and 2000, may also receive renewed scrutiny in light of the Pontikes’ affair.

“I want my church to stand up in support of victims,” Pontikes has said. So far, indications are that the church protects and supports the perpetrators of sex abuse crimes and not the victims.

 

a faux bicycle compnay  The Home Association Knights of Columbus Hall owned by Tilman Fertitta lieutenant Joe “Julian” Kuciembe,

Excusing Priestly Sexual Misconduct as ‘Consensual’

News: US News

Print Friendly and PDF

Houston’s Cdl. Daniel DiNardo downplaying monsignor’s abuse of trust and power

By Martina Moyski

The Catholic hierarchy’s use of the “consensual sex” card to justify priestly misconduct has been thrown on the table once again, this time after a Texas woman was taken advantage of emotionally, spiritually and physically by a priest serving as her spiritual counselor.

Msgr. Frank Rossi

Laura Pontikes, a 55-year-old construction executive in Texas, had been suffering from long-term depression and problems in her marriage when she sought help from Msgr. Frank Rossi, then-vicar general and deputy to Cdl. Daniel DiNardo in the Galveston-Houston Archdiocese. Pontikes first met Rossi in the confessional in 2007. 

Instead of receiving spiritual counseling, Pontikes was lured into an ongoing sexual relationship with Rossi.Tweet

Instead of receiving spiritual counseling, Pontikes was lured into an ongoing sexual relationship with Rossi, who characterized it as “blessed by God.” Rossi said their “holy touches” were encouraged by St. Paul. Emails turned over to the archdiocese and Associated Press (AP) show that Rossi kept hearing Pontikes’ confessions and counseled her husband on problems in their marriage — even as he was having a sexual affair with his wife.

He took a woman that went into a church truly looking for God, and he took me for himself,” Pontikes told AP.

Pontikes reported Rossi’s behavior to DiNardo in April 2016, saying Rossi had taken advantage of her vulnerability stemming from problems in her marriage and business in order to manipulate her into a sexual relationship.

Cdl. Daniel DiNardo’s Response

Initially DiNardo praised Pontikes for coming forward to report the incident and described her as a “victim.” DiNardo assured Pontikes that Rossi would never be a pastor or counsel women again.

He sent Rossi away to treatment, and never put the priest back into active ministry in his archdiocese. But Rossi transferred to the neighboring Beaumont diocese, where DiNardo gave him a clean bill of health to the bishop of Beaumont, failing to mention Rossi’s sexual misconduct with Pontikes.

DiNardo has since reneged on his support of Pontikes and is now maintaining that the relationship was “consensual” and that comments attributed to DiNardo are “an absolute fabrication.”

The couple have denied that they fabricated quotes and have demanded $10 million, saying they are being dismissed the way the Church dismisses other victims.

Pontikes’ husband confronted the cardinal about his about-faceAccording to AP, DiNardo warned the Pontikes that “the archdiocese would respond aggressively to any legal challenge — and that the fallout would hurt their family and business.”

It was announced this week that Rossi has been placed on “temporary administrative leave” pending the outcome of a previously undisclosed criminal sexual misconduct investigation launched by Houston police in August. This move by the archdiocese was made on Tuesday, after the AP alerted the U.S. Catholic Church that it was preparing a story involving Rossi.

‘Consent’ in Canon Law vs. ‘Consent’ in Civil Law

The criminal sexual misconduct investigation brings questions oconsent in priest-parishioner relationships to the fore. Texas civil law is stricter than Catholic canon law regarding consent.

According to Texas law, “A fiduciary is required to put the wellbeing and interest of the person for whom they are responsible above their individual interests. Texas law, above all, requires exceptional loyalty from a fiduciary and it also inflicts harsh punishments against those that breach their fiduciary roles.” 

It goes on, “even if the violation is not deliberate, the violator has to account for his or her actions.”

Pontikes is now seeking the recourse she could not find under canon law instead under civil law.

The argument that archdioceses are not liable for “consensual sex” between a priest and another adult has become the go-to defense in dioceses.

Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago was vocal in pushing the “consensual sex” argument at November’s Baltimore bishops’ meeting, when it was proposed that the definition of “vulnerable adults” be expanded to include regular adults. 

Cardinal Kevin Farrell, when he headed the diocese of the Dallas, Texas, used the same argument in dismissing claims brought by an adult male who lodged an accusation against Fr. Timothy Heines.

When law enforcement launched a criminal investigation against Fr. Juan Garcia Castillo in San Diego after a seminarian accused him of sexually groping him, the diocese, headed by gay-friendly Bp. Robert McElroy, commented, “We need to see what happens to the criminal case because the issue of consent is so important and if it’s not clear, we wait for that to get made clear.”

Ignoring the objective power differential between priests and those in their care — whether junior priests, seminarians, parishioners or acquaintances — and the requisite abuse of power in a sexual relationship between the two parties, prelates have often justified sexual misconduct by using the “consensual sex between adults” defense, thus shielding themselves and their dioceses from liability,

According to the Daily Caller, “The claim that sexual acts performed between adult seminarians and clergy, as in the case of former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, were consensual is questionable at best, given the legal definition of sexual harassment and the inherent power dynamic between people in different positions of church hierarchy.”

A fiduciary is required to put the wellbeing and interest of the person for whom they are responsible above their individual interests. Tweet

DiNardo’s mishandling of the Pontikes’ case raises farther-reaching questions for the Church in the context of the #MeToo movement, when powerful men and institutions are being held more publicly accountable for sex abuse and cover-ups, even as the Catholic Church seems to hold its own clergy to a lesser standard. 

DiNardo’s previous alleged mishandlings, including not doing enough to stop a priest under his supervision who is currently being charged with two counts of indecency with a child that occurred in 1998 and 2000, may also receive renewed scrutiny in light of the Pontikes’ affair.

“I want my church to stand up in support of victims,” Pontikes has said. So far, indications are that the church protects and supports the perpetrators of sex abuse crimes and not the victims.

 

Neoconservative fake Catholic Judas George Weigel is a Satanic Liar!

 

 

Neoconservative George Weigel Strikes Again

News: Commentary

An odd description of McCarrick’s final years in power

By Jesse Russell

On June 3, 1997, members of the neoconservative think tank the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) met to sign the white paper titled “Statement of Principles” advocating continued American global hegemony in the 21st century. Worried that an extended period of peace had settled in after the end of the Cold War and that the Clinton administration’s much-vaunted defense cuts had jeopardized the readiness of America’s military, the “chicken hawks” at PNAC set forth a plan that they hoped would “shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests.”

One of the signatories of the now infamous “Statement of Principles” was the Catholic commentator and papal biographer George Weigel, a man who has made a career of advocating for a rapprochement between a conservative brand of American liberalism and a very specific Americanist brand of Nouvelle théologie Catholicism.

In fact, PNAC is just one of many neoconservative think tanks of which Weigel has been and part and for which Weigel has attempted to woo Catholics to the neoconservative cause.

As a result of the general discontentment and sense of betrayal among many American Catholics, George Weigel, the Iraq War’s most vocal Catholic supporter, has lost a tremendous amount of credibility.Tweet

However, there is something especially eerie about Weigel’s association with PNAC.

One of the best known documents produced by the Project for a New American Century was its 2000 report “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces, and Resources for a New Century” in which, just one year before Sept. 11, 2001, PNAC mysteriously expressed hope for a “catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor,” which would further the reach and power of what President Dwight D. Eisenhower called the “military-industrial complex” in his January 1961 farewell address.

PNAC got what it was looking for on 9/11 when World Trade Center and Pentagon were attacked by Muslim hijackers. Since the beginning of the Afghan War on Oct. 7, 2001, American troops have been fighting a seemingly never-ending War on Terror which continues to this day.

As the war spread to Iraq on March 19, 2003, Weigel lent his aura as theologian and his role as what many Catholics at the time viewed as the American spokesman for John Paul II in support of the war, crafting a host of articles in journals such as First Things in which the papal biographer advocated for unconditional Catholic support for a war that John Paul II himself opposed.

Sixteen years after the Iraq War’s commencement, the void left by Saddam’s dictatorial rule has allowed the flourishing of mysteriously well-funded and supplied terrorist organizations such as Al Qaeda and ISIS who have successfully purged much of the Middle East of its ancient Christian population. Moreover, it is difficult to see how any of these wars have benefitted the United States, the people of Iraq or Christians throughout the Middle East — in fact, one wonders if it was really “American interests” for which PNAC and its neoconservative satellites like George Weigel were advocating.

 

As a result of the general discontentment and sense of betrayal among many American Catholics — many of whom have seen military friends and family killed or permanently damaged by the war — George Weigel, the Iraq War’s most vocal Catholic supporter, has lost a tremendous amount of credibility.

Indeed, since the election of Donald Trump, who ran on an America first, noninterventionist campaign, the overall neoconservative movement in America has largely been discredited.

However, still perched at First Things and a host of other well-funded and glossy Catholic publications, Weigel still has a relatively large audience. Largely shedding his previous image as a hawkish Cold Warrior turned into an even more vocal advocate of the War on Terror, Weigel has dedicated himself in recent years to protecting the brand of post-Vatican II (neo-) conservative Catholicism or what he called in a now-famous 2013 work “Evangelical Catholicism.”

As abuse allegations and evidence of wide-scale corruption continue to pour in from both conservative and liberal news outlets, it has been Weigel’s Sisyphean task of making it seem like, despite every appearance to the contrary, there are only a few bad apples in the Church whose minor peccadillos have caused some turbulence.

With continued revelations of the tremendous influence and power that disgraced cardinal Theodore “Uncle Ted” McCarrick wielded in the Church, Weigel, in a recent Catholic World Report piece titled “‘Uncle Ted’ and Me,” attempts to regain control of the narrative of American Catholic ecclesiastical politics that he dominated in the 2000s, framing the notorious serial clerical abuser as an odd liberal outsider within a fundamental sound and conservative American episcopacy.

Weigel, citing the recent viral Crux investigative piece “McCarrick correspondence confirms restrictions, speaks to Wuerl and China” — itself a summary of “The Figueiredo Report” — attempts to recast McCarrick as a Scooby Doo-esque villain who had hoodwinked the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) and the Vatican and not as being one of many (both liberal and conservative) homosexual predators in U.S. hierarchy.

Although the Crux article itself notes that McCarrick’s crimes were known to “senior Church officials, including the Vatican’s Secretary of State under Pope Benedict XVI, the head of the Congregation for Bishops, and the pope’s ambassador in the U.S,” Weigel does not blame Church authorities for not taking more serious action against “Uncle Ted”; rather it is because of, in Weigel’s words, Cardinal McCarrick’s “relentless self-promotion, even in retirement; his sycophancy with many superiors; his interference in Vatican diplomacy; and his brazen defiance of the orders of Pope Benedict XVI that he cease and desist from public activity” that the former head of the Washington, D.C. diocese was able to evade justice.

Even though Theodore McCarrick was made a cardinal and head of the Washington, D.C. archdiocese by none other than John Paul II himself, Weigel depicts the now-laicized “Uncle Ted” as a lone wolf liberal out of place in the new firmly conservative and morally rock solid post-Cardinal Joseph Bernardin USCCB.

If George Weigel thinks that Dolan is a reforming and conservative bishop who was unaware of Uncle Ted’s depravity, then there is a bridge on the moon that I want to sell the Catholic neoconservative godfather. Tweet

Weigel writes that McCarrick, in his later years, was led “deeper and deeper into the slough of ecclesiastical despond during the latter years of John Paul II’s pontificate and the entirety of Benedict XVI’s, as he saw the liberal dominance of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops dismantled by a generation of bishops who took their lead from John Paul, Benedict, and their authoritative interpretation of Vatican II.”

In Weigel’s oddly inaccurate description of McCarrick’s final years of power, it is difficult to gauge who these conservative prelates are.

Image
From left to right: McCarrick, Cdl. Dolan, Cdl. Wuerl

Cdl. Daniel DiNardo

It certainly could not be McCarrick’s friend and (now disgraced and departed) successor in Washington, D.C., Donald “La Donna” Wuerl, himself consecrated a bishop by John Paul II and made a cardinal by Benedict XVI.

Nor could it be Weigel’s own good friend Cardinal Timothy Dolan (who is pictured here sharing a laugh with Uncle Ted), who Weigel is also keen to exonerate in his Catholic World Report piece.

In his piece, Weigel attempts to spin the 2010 election of Cardinal Dolan as head of the USCCB as a triumph of the new conservative bishops who were going to clean house, telling the following odd story:

At the November 2010 meeting that eventually elected then-Archbishop Timothy Dolan as conference president over the liberal-establishment candidate, conference vice-president Bishop Gerald Kicanas, McCarrick buttonholed Dolan and, in his inimitable and gratingly avuncular way, demanded that “Timmy” not allow himself to be used by a “right-wing plot” to deny “Gerry” the conference presidency.

There is no need to point to the innumerable scandals to the faithful as well as spiritual and financial corruption and chicanery under Cardinal Dolan’s reign in the New York archdiocese, for these crimes and errors are all too well known.

If George Weigel thinks that Dolan is a reforming and conservative bishop who was unaware of Uncle Ted’s depravity, then there is a bridge on the moon that I want to sell the Catholic neoconservative godfather.

Ultimately, however, in 2019, the laity’s eyes are open, and, dear Mr. Weigel, the old tricks won’t work anymore.

Jesse Russell is a Catholic journalist and researcher who has published in a variety of journals including Crisis, Latin Mass Magazine and American Greatness. He and his wife homeschool four children.

 

Sex Abuse Inquiry Risks Diplomatic Flare-Up Between Holy See and Britain By Dr. Jules Gomes

 

Sex Abuse Inquiry Risks Diplomatic Flare-Up Between Holy See and Britain

News: World News

Nuncio’s non-cooperation confirms Pope’s lack of seriousness in tackling child sex abuse

By Dr. Jules GomesLONDON (ChurchMilitant.com) – The Vatican’s reluctance to release evidence on sex abuse cases could spark off a diplomatic row between Britain and the Holy See, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) has warned.

At its preliminary hearing on Thursday, the inquiry said that it had so far received has received no evidence from the apostolic nuncio, Abp. Edward J. Adams, but would continue to pursue this matter with the Holy See with the assistance of Britain’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO).

The victims’ solicitors for the investigation, which is examining the extent of institutional failures by the Catholic Church to protect children from sexual abuse, demanded to know what steps Britain’s ambassador to the Holy See had taken, or had been asked to take, in order to facilitate this and in order to avoid it becoming a diplomatic issue.

“[B]ecause that’s what it will be if the Holy See does not assist this inquiry,” Alan Collins, representing complainants identified only as G3, G4, G6 and J4, told the inquiry. Collins, a solicitor in the field of child abuse litigation, has acted in the Jimmy Savile and other high profile abuse scandals.

What has happened confirms suspicions that the Pope’s strategy is to pretend to tackle clerical sex abuse whilst in reality doing little or nothing.Tweet

Richard Scorer, a leading specialist in the field of abuse law and representing the Old Priorian Survivors Association and a number of complainants who have been given the cipher A, told Church Militant that he regarded “the lack of cooperation with the inquiry from the apostolic nuncio as unacceptable and that it confirms Pope Francis’ lack of seriousness in tackling abuse.”

Scorer added: “If Pope Francis wanted to do as he claims, he would instruct the nuncio to provide full cooperation. What has happened confirms suspicions that the Pope’s strategy is to pretend to tackle clerical sex abuse whilst in reality doing little or nothing.”

Since the hearing in February, IICSA has repeatedly pressed the FCO for updates on the progress of their discussions with the Holy See. On 18 April, the FCO provided further information as to the position of the Holy See in respect of the inquiry’s request but this has not included providing any evidence, IISCA was told.

The Holy See has refused to answer questions relating to background on how it works in dealing with abuse or provide documents on internal deliberations related to its judicial and administrative proceedings. It maintains that these are confidential, as with other sovereign states. As the Holy See’s ambassador to the United Kingdom, the apostolic nuncio is covered by diplomatic immunity.

However, the Holy See has assured IICSA it would co-operate with specific and proper requests for information conveyed through diplomatic channels and questions relating to specific actions and events.

Britain’s FCO clarified that its role was simply to facilitate the passage of correspondence between the inquiry and the Holy See.

“Unfortunately because of diplomatic immunity the inquiry has limited leverage. But if cooperation is not forthcoming, they can draw the obvious inferences in any report they produce,” a legal source told Church Militant.

Meanwhile, advocates for the survivors of child abuse launched a scathing attack on the Catholic Church’s “deployment of limitation defenses.”

“The Catholic Church is certainly, in my experience, by far the most aggressive in relying on limitation defenses,” Scorer told the inquiry. “Of course, all organizations use them to some degree, but the Catholic Church does go further, in my experience. There may be a debate to be had about whether that is insurer-driven or church-driven, but that’s the reality.”

In preparation for a further preliminary inquiry on Sept. 25, the inquiry has also asked for evidence from the president of the Conference of Bishops and the president of the Conference of Religious, as well as witness statements from Sister Jane Bertelsen, member of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, among others.

IISCA has also asked the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors for evidence about how, when and why it was created and what challenges it faces. It has called for information about the interplay between canon law and child sexual abuse allegations.

It has also summoned the Catholic Insurance Service to provide evidence in relation to the process by which child sexual abuse claims are dealt with and for information on past and current claims against the church and for data on what resources are spent on safeguarding across the church.

IISCA said it had already received a number of signed statements including a statement from Cardinal Vincent Nichols providing evidence in respect of the February meeting in Rome on the protection of minors in the Church.

Other statements were received from Monsignor Gordon Read to assist with matters of canon law.

Survivors are demanding mandatory reporting by the Church to statutory authorities and an independent national safeguarding body to oversee churches.Tweet

A significant proportion of the allegations will relate to historic events and will look at the structure of the Church and in particular what is described as “a lack of accountability,” especially in the context of a number of religious orders.

The public hearing will begin on Oct. 28. and conclude on Nov. 8.

Survivors are demanding mandatory reporting by the Church to statutory authorities and an independent national safeguarding body to oversee churches.

IISCA has also conducted public hearings into child abuse in the Church of England.

The Rev. Dr. Jules Gomes, B.A., B.D., M.Th., Ph.D. (Cantab) is a journalist, academic and editor of Rebel Priest (www.julesgomes.com).

 

Decent Americans Need to Teach the PBS a Lesson in “Punishment Politics? PBS “Arthur” Animated Promoting Sodomy and Communism Among Children From: Randy Engel, US Coalition for Life

 

The Magical King of Belgium, Must Read History of US/Belgium Internet Pedo Ring

Home Investigations The Magical King of Belgium

The Magical King of Belgium

2
414

By Gordon Duff with MT. Keshe

VT isn’t going to accuse anyone of anything.  This is big, as Trump would say, “huge.”

It goes everywhere.  We know this, there were accusations floating around, including a book whose authors were silenced, that a massive pedophile ring exists in Belgium that is tied to the death of Justice Scalia and all of those around President Trump, and by “all,” we mean everyone (except his dog…does Trump have a dog?)

Currently the Belgian king, former king, is fined 5k a day for failing to take a DNA test.  He has been fighting for 10 years.

Our sources say the case being applied is not the real one but another one is.

I can’t say anymore, other than we have run across this murderous ring before, seen their work and believe we are in the midst of the true “Pizzagate” of “dark nobility” and secret societies with London and Washington as involved as Brussels.  We make NO accusations.

Belgian king wins paedophile rebuttal

Belgium's King Albert II

A formal denial by King Albert II will go into every book

By Hugh Schofield in ParisThe French publishers of a book about paedophelia in Belgium have been ordered to insert a formal denial by the Belgian King, Albert II, of some of the allegationsPolicy Journal for Clandestine Services

King Albert and the Belgian Government went to court in Paris because they said the book, The Paedophile Dossier, contained a series of unfounded libels.

The book, by two French journalists, is a sensationalist account of the case of Marc Dutroux, the alleged sex offender and killer whose discovery five years ago caused such trauma in Belgium and the country’s political establishment.

Apart from general accusations of government cover-ups, the authors personally connect the name of King Albert with the scandal, saying that as crown prince he attended parties at which paedophiles were present.

Royal fury

The royal palace in Brussels was furious at the book’s publication.

In court, the king’s lawyers said the book was founded on rumours, insinuations and lies and they demanded the inclusion of a rebuttal.

The judge agreed and now every copy of the book must contain an addendum indicating the king’s protests at the attack on his personal reputation.

The judge did not, however, uphold a parallel plea from the Belgian Government complaining about allegations concerning its handling of the affair.

VT Exclusive: Largest Pedophile Ring in History, 70,000 Members, Heads of State, the Rats Scramble

By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

Millions read the news today, the pedophile ring “busted” or the earlier article about how the FBI actually ran it for several weeks, expanding it, drawing in tens of thousands. Those who read it thought they knew, thought they were getting the story but as is so often the case, the truth goes so much further. 

When Veterans Today tied the murder of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Scalia to a White House blackmail plot and a strange tale involving the Keshe Foundation, it became clear that the highest and most powerful in Europe, the US and around the world, were tied together in a web of ritual child abuse on a massive scale. For the Scalia tale, refer to Appendix I.

Today’s story is one more aspect of this. VT’s involvement goes back to 1991 when key VT staffers worked for America’s intelligence community. A GOP high level staffer approached the CIA claiming that President George H.W. Bush was being blackmailed. It was said that the President was at a political fundraiser in St. Louis where, unknown to the President, top GOP campaign donors were having sex with young males, some of whom had been spirited away from Boys Town in Nebraska of Father Flanagan fame.

The rumors became more than rumors when Bush 43 took office and brought with him, according to a high level White House informant, a virtual army of Neocon pedophiles and “nancyboys” who set the tone for 8 years of crushed civil liberties. staged economic crashes and the dirtiest wars in America’s history.

The door didn’t open again until Iranian physicist, Mehran T. Keshe came to us with his own story. Invited to Belgium, sponsored by the Royal Family, Keshe was introduced to internet guru Sterling Allen and Belgian “fixer,” Dirk Lauressens. Within a short time, it became clear that he was there as a prisoner, not a guest, having fallen into a web of pedophiles that control public life in Belgium and the Netherlands, control corporations, courts, the police and do so rather publicly.

With Keshe’s story, we traced Sterling Allen, through his work with Belgium’s Royal Family, to his questioning by the FBI, to the seizure of his computers and eventually to his real task in life, webmaster for a massive pedophile ring that supplied children for the members of secret societies that control our daily lives through suppression of technology and the waging of endless war.

From NBC News:

MASSIVE PEDOPHILE RING BUSTED; 230 KIDS SAVED – US NEWS – CRIME & COURTS | NBC NEWS

AN INTERNET PEDOPHILE RING WITH UP TO 70,000 MEMBERS — THOUGHT TO BE THE WORLD’S LARGEST —HAS BEEN UNCOVERED BY POLICE, A SECURITY OFFICIAL SAID WEDNESDAY.

THE EUROPEAN POLICE AGENCY EUROPOL SAID IN A STATEMENT THAT “OPERATION RESCUE” HAD IDENTIFIED 670 SUSPECTS AND THAT 230 ABUSED CHILDREN IN 30 COUNTRIES HAD BEEN TAKEN TO SAFETY. MORE CHILDREN ARE EXPECTED TO BE FOUND, EUROPOL SAID.

A pedophile ring, 70,000 strong, has been identified and hundreds arrested, an organization run on the internet, centered in the Free Energy Community, including websites run out of Paris, the Netherlands and Belgium.

What isn’t being told is that this same organization, also known as the Red Circle, runs through secret societies around the world:

  • Bilderberg
  • St. Hubertus
  • Federalist Society
  • Knights of Malta (Rome, not KMFAP in Budapest)
  • Council on Foreign Relations
  • Federal Reserve Bank
  • NATO
  • Royal Families of Belgium and Netherlands
  • SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States)

So much of this story revolves around Mehran T. Keshe, whose plasma related defense technologies, threaten the military balance of power, disabling American stealth drones and even leaving an AEGIS destroyer floating, dead in the water, in the Black Sea.

Anti-Keshe “troll” and convicted pedophile Sterling Allen, former Rense Radio host, now serving a life sentence, is said to have supplied the encryption keys that allowed the FBI to take over the Netherlands based site. From NBC:

“THE WEBSITE OPERATED FROM A SERVER BASED IN THE NETHERLANDS AND, AT ITS HEIGHT, BOASTED UP TO 70,000 MEMBERS WORLDWIDE,” IT ADDED.

“It attempted to operate as a ‘discussion–only’ forum where people could share their sexual interest in young boys without committing any specific offences, thus operating ‘below the radar’ of police attention,” Europol said.

POLICE INFILTRATED SITE
THE EUROPOL STATEMENT SAID U.K. AND AUSTRALIAN POLICE INFILTRATED THE SITE TO IDENTIFY THE MEMBERS WHO POSED THE GREATEST DANGER TO CHILDREN. POLICE ALSO SOMETIMES POSED AS CHILDREN ONLINE AS PART OF THE INVESTIGATION.

LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES FROM 13 COUNTRIES, INCLUDING THE UNITED STATES, AUSTRALIA, CANADA, ITALY, SPAIN AND THE U.K., WERE INVOLVED IN THE CASE, EUROPOL SAID.

THE STATEMENT SAID EUROPOL ANALYSTS HAD CRACKED THE SECURITY FEATURES OF A KEY COMPUTER SERVER AT THE CENTER OF THE NETWORK WHICH UNCOVERED THE IDENTITIES OF SUSPECTED CHILD SEX OFFENDERS.

AND, AFTER HIS ARREST, THE FORUM’S DUTCH ADMINISTRATOR HELPED POLICE BREAK ENCRYPTION MEASURES THAT SHIELDED USERS’ IDENTITIES, ALLOWING POLICE TO BEGIN THEIR COVERT INVESTIGATIONS.

“EUROPOL SUBSEQUENTLY ISSUED OVER 4,000 INTELLIGENCE REPORTS TO POLICE AUTHORITIES IN OVER 30 COUNTRIES IN EUROPE AND ELSEWHERE, WHICH HAS LED TO THE ARRESTS OF SUSPECTS AND THE SAFEGUARDING OF CHILDREN,” EUROPOL SAID.”

In September 2015, Iranian physicist Mehran T. Keshe met with the FBI in Rome, a meeting set up by VT. From a source at Europol:

It was this from Veterans Today that helped push this forward: “It was Keshe’s information given to the FBI in Italy that led to the seizure of Sterling Allan’s computer back in January of 2016, which led to the Obama White House getting files tying Justice “Tony” Scalia to a child sex ring and demonstrating that it was Scalia that had protected Allan. With Justice Scalia exposed to Obama blackmail, his own friends smothered him to death with a pillow, and walked past police, while the world moved on, no autopsy, no investigation.”
That explains why Hollande (President of the French Republic) was scared he is linked to child abuse in France, via Belgium as well. Abdessalem (Foreign Minister of Tunisia) was traded by the FBI so Hollande can stay in power, sign the tafta and much more allow American military presence in France, which is now turning against him… That explains why the US military unit near Milan was behind us to see what we had in stock against Bibi (Netanyahu) and Hollande… now that they have Hollande, they are pushing him to the edge, using pressure on Sarkozy, right hand of Bibi, they moved in Tripoli, blackmailing Roma.
Have you seen this man (Paris, France)?
Have you seen this man (Paris, France)?

Thus, what begins as a hundred arrests, when you peel the levels, involves the French elections and even the recent Bataclan attack in Paris now tied to, if you can imagine it, a police informant smuggled into France through Italy by Tunisia, who out of curiosity runs an anti-Keshe website.

Why do they hate Keshe?

APPENDIX I
From March 1, 2016

Scalia funeral

…by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor and Ian Greenhalgh

[ Editorial note: Revelations on the Allan case, which led to Scalia now lead into the entire Koch network, including the Federalist Society, said to be operating not simply in law schools but America’s high schools as well, and into the Heritage Foundation.

We don’t know when it began, maybe at the Presidio under Michael Aquino and the Temple of Set or before. We do know it has victimized thousands of children around the world, not only in America but channeling children through Belgium and the Netherlands into sexual slavery and death.

What is it that makes the powerful desire what is so hurtful and obscene? When we ignored the Franklin Coverup, we opened ourselves to this… Gordon Duff ]

___________

Scalia – What really happened?

Justice Antonin Scalia was surprised when he was ordered to the White House. This was not a man you gave orders to, especially not President Obama. It was Justice Antonin Scalia who vacated the long sacrosanct immunity from civil lawsuits, opening the door for a weakened presidency.

Sources say that Scalia was the single actor behind the impeachment of Bill Clinton. President Obama was aware of this and had ordered the FBI to set out traps for Scalia. We will now outline the downfall of Antonin Scalia. Yes, this is a story of secret societies, operating worldwide and ritual Satanic child abuse that permeates Washington.

When Scalia left the White House after a meeting with the president just before flying to Texas, the manila envelope he was carrying had printouts from a computer seized by FBI Special Agent Jeff Ross of the Salt Lake City, Utah field office, or so informants tell us.

Scalia left the White House carrying “slam dunk proof” that would lead to the arrest, conviction and, of course, impeachment of a seated Supreme Court Justice, files that contained names of victims and details on sex acts, preferred “types” along with dates and places. All of this was on the seized computer and these files went “up hill” from the FBI to the Department of Justice and directly over to the White House.

THERE, POLITICAL ADVISORS LEAPT ON THEM, SEEING A CHANCE TO LEVERAGE A JUSTICE AND, IN THIS CASE, AND THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT, BRING DOWN SCALIA IN SUCH A WAY THAT CONSERVATIVES WOULD BE FORCED TO ACCEPT VIRTUALLY ANY OBAMA NOMINATION.

When Scalia arrived in Houston and chartered a plane after ditching his US Marshall protection detail, Scalia and his companion, C. Allen Foster. Foster heads the Order of Hubertus and is co-owner with John Poindexter of the Cibolo Creek Ranch, 25,000 plus acres free for anyone to use, according to John Poindexter, “free of charge,” so long as they are a supreme court justice, “A list” celebrity like Mick Jagger or billionaires, others need not apply.

St. Hubertus ritual mask from Scalia death scene, photo credit: InfoWars.com
St. Hubertus ritual mask taken from Cibolo Creek ranch (credit: InfoWars.com)

THE CRUX OF THE STORY IS HOW THEY GOT SCALIA. ACCORDING TO SOURCES, SCALIA HAD BEEN PROVIDING PROTECTION FOR AN INTERNATIONAL PEDOPHILE RING AND WAS MURDERED BY “FRIENDS” WHO HE HAD INFORMED OF THE NATURE OF HIS VISIT WITH OBAMA AND THE DOOM IT SIGNALED FOR THOSE AROUND SCALIA, PROSECUTION, RUIN AND CITIZENS UNITED REVERSED.

The mechanism Scalia used to provide this protection was the Federalist Society which chooses the judges throughout the US judiciary system so should any unfortunate pedophile find himself in court, the judge was under Scalia’s control, thus making a successful prosecution difficult to achieve.

The Federalist Society grooms and recruits candidates to become judges at a young age – college age kids; they specifically seek out suitable candidates who have certain moral ambiguities that can be exploited.

Thus a stranglehold is placed on the judicial system of the United States by a group which serves the interests of big business – corrupt corporations, big pharma, the oil and coal barons; this is how their interests are, time and again, placed ahead of those of we, the people with the result that our environment and our bodies are polluted by the products of these corporations, be it poisons like aspartame and GMO crops in our food, toxins in our ground water (see Flint, MI) or just plain old exploitation of poor people such as the coal miners of West Virginia and Kentucky.

Scalia met with the Order of Saint Hubertus, the patron saint of million dollar dude ranch hunting. As of yet, no one has identified who was there, it seems that Supreme Court justices are found all the time with pillows over their faces and nobody asks a thing, but this was Texas and they make their own rules down there.

WE REMEMBER FORMER FBI DIRECTOR AND FOUNDER, J EDGAR HOOVER, THE MAN WHO SAID RITUAL SATANIC CHILD ABUSE WAS A CONSPIRACY THEORY. HE IS ALSO THE MAN WHO SAID THE MAFIA DIDN’T EXIST. 

Scalia’s talk in Texas was said to have gone like this: “They have us, we are all going down unless we can give them what they want and they are holding all the cards, they have everything.” There was no negotiation with the White House, instead Scalia got, we are told and multiple sources confirm, a pillow over the face and a heroic funeral, one that President Obama refused to attend. Now we know why.

For a seated president to not attend the funeral of a pedophile is unthinkable.

__________

The computer itself belonged to a Sterling David Allen, arrested and charged with child rape and sodomy by the FBI after an investigation that began with a meeting in Rome, Italy. The FBI had known about Allen for some time, had wanted to arrest him since 2014 but had been blocked, they just didn’t know why or who was behind it, not until Justice Scalia died. Within 9 days, Allen was jailed, and the evidence he held began to yield gold.

Allen is being held on these charges with bail set at $250,000.

We were shown an email from Allen where he tells of his January 15, 2016 meeting with Agent Ross at which time his computers were seized by the FBI. What we are told was on Allen’s computer and what Allen told agents is astounding. Allen confessed, we are told, not only to his own sex crimes but to being recruited by a powerful international organization that provided him broad protection from prosecution.

From Ian Greenhalgh:

IT IS VERY SICK, BUT IF YOU REALLY WANT TO WATCH AND HEAR THE RAMBLINGS OF A MAD MAN JUST WATCH THIS VIDEO WHERE STERLING D. ALLAN SAYS HE IS GOD IN THE FLESH, ADMITS TO BEING A PAEDOPHILE, ADMITS HE HAS COMMITTED SEXUAL ABUSE WITH AN UNDERAGE CHILD, AND SAYS THAT HE IS WAITING TO BE ARRESTED. MR. ALLAN CLAIMS HE CHOSE THIS LIFE BEFORE COMING TO EARTH TO BE A “SCAPEGOAT” WHICH OF COURSE IS ALL FORETOLD IN HIS INSANE “ALPHABETICS.”

We are told that Allen became increasingly unstable as his own feelings of guilt and his own public confessions of child sex crimes were inadequate to bring about his own arrest, an arrest he openly asked for time and time again.

Allen, who using his computer skills helped fellow pedophiles scour the internet for vulnerable children.

High level sources confirm that Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was murdered, that in itself is neither an original claim nor beyond the realm of likelihood based on circumstances allegedly tied to his death. By that, we are speaking of the “pillow over the head” and allegations of a “cover-up autopsy,” well outside legal requirements for someone of Scalia’s position.

Sources in the White House confirm that immediately prior to his flight to Texas, ostensibly for a hunting trip with 35 “close friends,” many of whom are members of the highly secret Order of Saint Hubertus. As is being reported, initially in the Washington Post with broader allegations made on the InfoWars website, tying the Hubertus Order to Bohemian Grove antics, long subject to speculation in the alternative media.

We became aware of the case in August 2015 when we were shown correspondence between Allen and representatives of the Keshe Foundation. Allen ran several popular websites on alternative energy and was a popular speaker, often appearing on the Coast to Coast radio show with Detroit native, George Noory.

Increasingly it became obvious that Allen had been using these venues for sexual trafficking of children. It wasn’t hard to figure out, he did it openly spoke of it constantly (as seen in the YouTube above) and lived as though he were above the law. Over the next few months, particularly when confronted by Iranian born physicist MT Keshe, who ordered Allen and those around him banned from all Keshe forums, Allen openly flaunted his criminal activities.

What made this particularly insidious is that it was obvious not only that Allen was not acting alone but that he had broad support not only in his home state of Utah, where he was able to avoid prosecution, but in Belgium as well. There, Allen and associates Hans Bracquene, Dirk Laureyssens and Ad Van den Elshout moved against the Keshe group, securing against Keshe’s wishes technologies with defense related applications and passing them on to MI 5 in Britain.

When Keshe moved against this group and tried to secure his patents, he found himself being chased down the highway, shots fired, his car run off the road. Police arrested and soon “misplaced” the culprits, and soon thereafter, representatives of Belgium’s “royals” told Keshe to leave Belgium or be buried there.

On the European end of the FBI investigation, the trail, all of which is easily followed by the “breadcrumbs” Sterling David Allen has left, leads to the highest and most powerful of the scientific communities where blackmail, kidnapping and torture, threats against families and in particular, threats against children, have placed members of secret societies in positions of power at universities, think tanks, police and counter-terrorism agencies and even the European Space
Agency.

More to come…

National alert: PBS promoting sodomy and lesbianism among children! Randy Engel

 

National alert: PBS promoting sodomy and lesbianism among children
FacebookTwitterGoogle+

By Randy Engel

May 15, 2019

Dear Friends – Every tax-paying American citizen “contributes” $1.35 a year to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting – self-identified as “America’s largest classroom.” But you may not like what the PBS is teaching your youngsters.

On May 13, 2019, PBS stations across the nation aired a segment of the popular children’s animated show, “Arthur” which promotes male homosexual relations in the form of a “marriage” between two male characters.

The 15 minute segment “Mr. Ratburn and the Special Someone,” is available for viewing at https://pbskids.org/video/arthur/3028697275

It’s time to teach the media masters at the PBS the meaning of “punishment politics.”

I’ve already sent President Trump an email objecting to the misuse of taxes and the public trust to promote sodomy. An earlier “Arthur” segment promoted lesbianism [two “moms”], but escaped under the public radar.

I’m as angry as hell! And the President and every American should be too!

Please !!! Get out your cell phone and call the White House now. If this message arrives in the evening you can email the White House at any time of day or night.

ACTION LINE – DO IT NOW!!!

Phone Comment Line to White House – 202-456-1111 [9am-4pm weekdays]

Email Line to White House – Easy and Quick and Free

https://akastg-www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

See recent CBS News article below on this moral travesty. Act Now!

“Arthur” character comes out as gay and gets married in season 22 premiere

Caitlin O’Kane

© PBS/”Arthur” screen-shot-2019-05-14-at-7-42-25-

To the surprise of many, the 22nd season of “Arthur” just premiered on PBS – yes, that lovable aardvark and his friends are still on the air. But the classic children’s show is very much keeping up with the times. The premiere episode revealed Arthur’s teacher, Mr. Ratburn, is gay.

In “Mr. Ratburn and the Special Someone,” the beloved teacher of Arthur and his friends gets married to a man. It’s not the first time the children’s show has included LGBTQ storylines although the last one occurred in 2005, TV Line reports. In the episode “Postcards from Buster,” Arthur’s best friend met children with two moms while on a trip to Vermont.


© Provided by CBS Interactive Inc. Arthur and his friends overhear Mr. Ratburn and an uptight woman, voiced by Jane Lynch, discussing his wedding. They believe the woman is his bride and devise a plan to stop the wedding.

The word “lesbian” was not used in the episode, nor was the word “gay” used in the episode about Mr. Ratburn. However, the show received praise for teaching children that men can marry men and women can marry women.

In the season 22 premiere, the students see Mr. Ratburn speaking to an uptight lady, voiced by guest star Jane Lynch. They fear she is the person Mr. Ratburn is going to marry, and they devise a plan to stop the wedding and prevent a life of misery for their teacher.


© Provided by CBS Interactive Inc. Arthur and his friends show up to the wedding ready to object to it – only to see Mr. Ratburn walk down the aisle with his groom.

But the kids chicken out when they get to the wedding and don’t stand up to object to the marriage. Then, they learn the uptight woman is just Mr. Ratburn’s sister, who is officiating the nuptials. When Mr. Ratburn walks down the aisle, he is arm in arm with a man.

The third-graders are happy for their newlywed teacher, but there’s one thing they are mortified by: his dancing.

People took to Twitter when they learned about the episode – but many were sharing their disbelief that “Arthur” was still on the air. Some Twitter users wrote that they hope other TV shows and movies include LGBTQ characters and storylines.

TELL THE PBS TO PICK ON SOMEONE THEIR OWN SIZE. NOT OUR CHILDREN!!!!!!!

© Randy Engel