All posts by frchristopherterryop

V. CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS BY THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, EXPUNGE CRIMINAL RECORD AND BE PAID BY THE HOUR FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ALL HARM DONE PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

NOTICE OF APPEAL IN PETITION OF WRIT OF

                                       MANDAMUS

                     (TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE)

 

                                                 IN

 

                      MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS

                         DISTRICT COURT, AT LAW FIVE

 

 

                                     RE:  NO. 17-322548

 

 MAY 19, 2017, COURT ORDER TO DISMISS INTEREST OF

    JUSTICE      -DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID-

 

ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT SAID ABOVE ENTITLED AND NUMBERED CAUSE BE

AND THE SAME IS HEREBY DISMISSED

 

APPELLANT AND PETITIONER

 

FATHER CHRISTOPHER TERRY, O.P.

                         THE ORDER OF PREACHERS

 

PRAYS

 

      THE HONORABLE JUDGE KATHLEEN HAMILTON

                                        BOARD OF JUDGES

 

                  MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS,

    DISTRICT COUNTY COURT 359TH, DISTRICT COURT

    2017 W. PHILLIPS, STE. 305, CONROE, TEXAS 77301 2874:

 

                    AND OR ALL HONORABLE JUDGES

 

WITH CONSTITUTIONALSTATE/DISTRICT/AND COUNTY JUDICIAL STANDING TO HEAR SAID APPEAL AND PETITION FOR COURT ORDER BY MANDAMUS BY SAID PLAINTIFF, FATHER CHRISTOPHER TERRY, O.P.

 

                                                     

 

 

Court Clerk/Coordinator: Susan Mitchell, Court Coordinator  (Montgomery County)
Court Address: 359th District Court
207 W Phillips, STE. 305
Conroe, Texas 77301 2874
    Phone: 936.539.7900
936.538.8187 Fax: 936.538.8187

 

 ABSTRACT

 

 

 

  • APPELLANT PRO SE AND PETITIONER WRIT OF MANDAMUS, FATHER CHRISTOPHER DANIEL TERRY O.P. MAKES MOTION IN APPEAL AND PETITIONS WRIT OF MANDAMUS RE: CASE NO. 17-322548, MAY19, 2017, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, AT LAW FIVE, CONROE, TEXAS, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE SAID CASE (EXHIBIT 1: SAID MAY 19TH 2017, COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE )

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, APPELLANT PRO SE AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS PETITIONER, SAID FR. CHRISTOPHER DANIEL TERRY, O.P. PRAYS IN APPEAL SAID HONORABLE JUDGE OR JUDGES WITH JUDICIAL STANDING   RE: CASE NO. 17-322548, MAY 19, 2017, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, AT LAW FIVE, CONROE, TEXAS, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO SAID  COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE SAID CASE, BE, ADJUDICATED BY HONORABLE JUDGE DE FACTO NULL AND VOID PERCAUSAM MISTRIAL VIA WRIT OF MANDAMUS  RECALLED, REPEALED, AND REPLACED BY SAID HONORABLE JUDGE IN SUMMARY JUDGEMENT OF SAID CASE BY MANDAMUS COURT ORDER TO DIMISS ALL CHARGES, ET AL IN SAID CASE AND ALL OUTSTANDING ESTOPPEL THERE OF. “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” PER CAUSAM MAILICIOUS PROSECUTION PURSUANT OF JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR THE APPELLANT UNJUSTLY BELEAGURED IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY NEVER THE LESS DUE TO SAID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF FOR JUSTICE BEING MERELY AN UNLAWFUL RUSE BY SAID COURT TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE AND DENY EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ALL OTHER HARM DONE, THEREBY. SAID MAY 19TH, COURT ORDER TO DIMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE IN SUPPRESSING FROM SAID HEARING, MAY 19, 2017, ONE OF THE AB INITIO ENHANCING SPURIOUS CHARGES OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION RES IPSO. IGITUR, IS LEGALLY DEFICIENT AND SAID SPURIOUS ENHANCING CHARGE WAS NOT PROMULGATED PUBLICLY AND OFFICALLY, NOR RECORDED IN SAID COURT RECORD, AS SUCH NULL AND VOID, WITHOUT FORCE OF LAW IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, AND IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE DENYING THE APPELLANT EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT BY SUPPRESSION OF EXONERATING COURT DOCUMENTS EVIDENCE VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF SAID COURT OF THE APPELLANT.

 

 

2) RES IPSO, IGITUR SAID APPELLANT PRAYS SAID HONORABLE JUDGE GIVING SAID HEARING IN MONTGOMERY COURT  RE: CASE NO. 17-322548, MAY 19, 2017, MONTGOMERY COUNT COURT, LAW FIVE CONROE, TEXAS,  ACTING  AS JUDGE DAMICO  COURT ORDERED TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE SAID CASE FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE KATHLEEN HAMILTON (AND OR JUDGES HAVING CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT  JUDICIAL STANDING IN SAID CASE TO HEAR SAID APPEAL AND GRANT PETITION  WRIT OF MANDAMUS IN SAID CASE NO. 17-322548, MAY19, 2017 AND TO UPHOLD  APPELLANT’S  AB INITIO MOTION NOT GIVEN A HEARING MAY 19TH, 2017   IN SAID CASE,  BY SAID COURT AND JUDGE IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.  RES IPSO, IGITUR, THROW OUT SAID FORMER NULL AND VOID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE  VIA WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND IN SUMMARY JUDGEMENT RATIFIED BY THE APPELLANT  SAID HONORABLE JUDGE WITH JUDICIAL STANDING ORDER BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS  OF APPELLANT’S INTENDED, BUT DENIED IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, AB INTIO MOTION FOR HEARING MAY 19TH, 2017,   TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  ALL CHARGES, CONVICTIONS, SENTENCING, FINES, AND PROBATION, AND EXPUNGE CRIMINAL RECORD, AGAIN PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION UNDER COLOR OF LAW  IN VIOLATION OF APPELLANT PRO SE’S VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS  IN SAID CASE NO. 17-322548, BY SAID MAY 19TH DELICT NULL AND VOID COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE WHICH, BEING A RUSE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE TO DENY THE APPELLANT JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, HAS THEREBY MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTED THE APPELLANT, AND PLACED THE APPELLANT THROUGH SAID NULL AND VOID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER IN CONTINUOUS DOUBLE JEOPARDY PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AS CONTINUOUS WARRANTS FOR THE APPELLANT’S ARREST AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT HAVE BEEN ORDERED AFTER MAY 19TH, NULL AND VOID SAID COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

 

 

                                        3)  ESTOPPEL IN SAID APPEAL

 

 SAID CASE NO. 17-322548 AN ESTOPPEL RE: PRECEDENT TORT: SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT CAUSE NO. 2016-215-APRIL 4TH, 2016 1ST DUI + .15 BAC ENHANCED TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR-  2/23/17 “FALSE” THE APPELLANT BY SAID APPEAL  VOLO CONTENDERE sic volo te tibi persuadere, CONVICTION OF THE APPELLANT AND SENTENCING AND PROBATION ORDER BY SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT, APRIL 6TH, 2017,   AN ESTOPPEL AND PRECEDENT TORT RE: NO. 1CC18542 DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID-DL-CONVICTION  3/13/2017 IN THE JUSTICE COURT PCT. 01, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS, JUDGE WAYNE L. MACK, ESTOPPEL REGARDING  SAID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

 

                                            4) FACTUAL GROUNDS

 

PURSUANT OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN DENYING BY SAID MAY 19TH RUSE EQUITABLE REDRESS AND DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ALL CHARGES, ET AL PER   CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY SAID MC COURT, IN LAW FIVE JUDGE, IS IN CONTINUOUS VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS MAROONING THE APPELLANT IN CONTINUOUS DOUPLE JEOPARDY. RES IPSO IGITUR, THE GROUNDS FOR THE APPELLANT IN APPEAL PURSUANT OF  RELIEF FROM SAID “RUSE” MAY 19TH, 2017 COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE DIRECTED TO SAID COURT AND HONORABLE JUDGE AND TO PETITION WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS SHOWN IN LEGAL BRIEF VIA  EVIDENTIARY AND EXONERATING  SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT DOCUMENTS AND DELICT AND INVALID WARRANTS AND SPURIOUS PROBATION ORDERS BY ONE, JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, (ACTING ONLY AS A LEGAL PERSON) BUT VIA THE SAN JACINTO COUNTY DISTRICT COURT (SJCC) MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTING THE APPELLANT CONTINUOUSLY DUE TO SAID MAY 19TH RUSE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.  

 

 

 

                                                         4) COLLUSSION

 

MAY 13TH, 2017 AB INITIO ARRESTING AND JAILING CHARGES LEVELED  AGAINST THE APPELLANT BY THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF’S  DEPARTMENT  ARE 1: DRIVING WHILE LICENSE  INVALID  AND 2: ENHANCED BY VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION THEREBY. SAID ENHANCING CHARGE, VIOLATION OF AN ABSURDLY OBVIOUS PRIMA FACIA SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, WITH NO CONSTITUTIONAL/ STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING AB INITIO IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE, WAS UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSED AS EXONERATING EVIDENCE FOR PUBLIC HEARING BY SAID MAY 19TH, 2017 MCC ASS. DA.  MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE BY SAID RUSE MAY 19TH ORDER, SOLELY  1.) THE AB INITIO (MAY 13TH, 2017) CHARGE, DRIVING WHILE LICENSE IN VALID, MEANWHILE IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, SAID MAY 19TH MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE BY MCC ASS. DISTRICT ATTORNEY UNLAWFULLY AND MALICIOUSLY SUPPRESSED FROM A PUBLIC HEARING IN A COURT OF LAW THE AB INITIO OBVIOUSLY ABSURD PRIMA FACIE SPURIOUS ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING AS SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGE IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE TO BE SHOWN.

 

SAID UNLAWFULL SUPPRESSION OF NO.2 SOLELY, FROM PUBLIC HEARING IN A COURT OF LAW VIOLATES THE APPELLANT’S VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO MAKE MOTION AT ANY TIME IN COURT PROCEEDINGS TO DISMISS “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” ALL CHARGES ET AL. PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, MAKE PLEA OF INNOCENCE,  TO BE EXONERATED BY ALL KNOWN EVIDENCE NOT TO BE WITH HELD AND SUPPRESSED BY THE STATE’S PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT, TO FACE ACCUSERS (JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES) AND ALL CHARGES IN A PUBLIC AND CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL BEFORE A JURY OF PEERS AND A JURISPRUDENTA  JUDGE  NOT RELIGIOUSLY BIGOTED, WITH NO MANIFEST JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT BY SAID SAME JUDGE AND COURT,  IN THE PROCEEDINGS AND OUTCOME. AND TO BE GIVEN IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE DUE  RELIEF FROM CONTINUOUS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY COURT IN EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR  FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ALL HARM DONE THEREBY TO THE APPELLANT  VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY SAID JUDGE AND COURT.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR SUBSEQUENT MAY 19TH COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE ONLY 1.) AND SUPPRESS UNLAWUFLLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE FROM THE HEARING IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT 2.)   TO THE CONTRARY, UNJUSTLY BY SAID SPURIOUS MC COURT ROOM RUSE DID UNLAWFULLY MAROON AFTER THE FACT APPELLANT IN CONTINUOUS DOUBLE JEOPARDY BY ALL SAID MALICIOUS ACCUSERS, SUBJECT TO DELICT AND INVALID WARRANTS, AND FALSE JAILINGS PURSUANT OF  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT IN THE COMMISSION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME, ALL FRUIT OF A POISONOUS TREE DERIVING FROM ALL SAID ESTOPPEL CASES: 1.) DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID, AND 2.) SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION VIOLATION.

 

 

                                             5) PRELIMINARY  MOTIONS

 

  1. SAID APPELLANT PRO SE MOTIONS FOR COURT ORDER OF PROTECTIONFROM CONTINUING MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT BY DELICT WARRANT AND SPURIOUS PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, FACILITATED BY SAID MAY 19TH .RUSE COURT ORDER TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.

 

  1.  FACTUAL BASIS FOR COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION

 

APRIL 4, 2016 THP6 TDPSHP DUI NSTANTER TX4KYLOUTI5U, (EXHIBIT) AND TDPS HPO BILLY CONLEY, JR. TX4KYLOUTI5U TDPS DUI OFFENSE REPORT STATES UNDER OATH IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001, A NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE OF MPM 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY. SAID NON EXISTENT MPM 450 1-59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY DUI OFFENSE SITE  SPURIOUSLY LINKS VIA MALICIOUS DUI PROSECUTION BY SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT AND SJC ACCOMPLICES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD,  THE APPELLANT TO SUPPRESSED BY TDPSFC LAB “BACK LOG,” EXONERATING EVIDENCE, IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE OF FALSE ARREST WITH NO PROBABLE CAUSE, THE APPELLANT’S  BLOOD SAMPLES PIRATED ON SAID APRIL 4TH, 2016 DATE BY DANNY VANDERMAN FOR TDPSC LAB UNDER CONTRACT  FOR TDPSFC LAB “BLOOD SAMPLE PROPS” TRIGGERING A FRAUDULENT SELF VERIFYING TDPSCF LAB ALCOHOL CONTENT LABORATORY REPORT, LABORATORY CASE NUMBER: HOU-1604-04344 ISSUED DATE: APRIL 25, 2016  MALICIOUSLY ATTRIBUTED TO THE APPELLANTLY OF  BAC .231  – ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT OF .O8 BAC- THE HIGHEST BAC LEVEL LISTED ON THE STANDARD BAC CHART- DUI, APRIL 4TH, 2016. SAID NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE OF MPM 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY.  IS A SPURIOUS ILLEGAL RUSE BY TDPSHPO TO FRAUDULENTLY ESTABLISH IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001, CRIMINAL JURISDICTION OVER THE APPELLANT FOR DUI IN SAN JACINTO COUT BY FEIGNED CONSTITUIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING  FOR SAN JACINTO COUNTY JUDGE JOHN LOVETT NON THROUGH FRAUD BY NON-EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE OF MPM 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY PURSUANT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD (TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  THE APPELLANT, THEREBY CAN NOT BE INCRIMINATED BY ANY PHYSICAL EVIDENCE DERIVING ALLEGEDLY FROM SAID NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE OF MPM 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY  ALBEIT  “OPEN CONTAINER” PLANTED EVIDENCE AND SPURIOUS BAC BLOOD SAMPLE TDPSCF LAB BOTH MANUFACTURED AND SUPRRESSED AS POTENTIALLLY EXONERATING, VIOLATING THEREBY IN THE STATE OF TEXAS IN ALL DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION THE DUI DEFENDANT’S  WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE FROM A FALLACIOUS NON EXISTENT OFFENSE SITE VIOLATES THE IVTH, VTH, VITH AMENDMENTS AND TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE.

 

SAID RUSE IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 BY BILLY CORLEY TO FEIGN JUDICIAL STANDING FOR SJCC AND JUDGE JOHN LOVETT IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION FOR DUI OF THE APPELLANT SWEARING TO A NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE IN SAN JACINTO COUNTY ON SAID DUI INSTANTER AND ON SAID DUI OFFENSE REPORT BY CORLEY IN VIOLATION OF FAA 1001 (EXHIBIT) CONSTITUTES A BREACH OF  CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/ DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING OF  JOHN LOVETT AS SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGE .

 

RES IPSO IGITUR   JOHN LOVETT AND ALL AFTER THE FACT ACOMPLICES IS BY SAID COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION ORDERED IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE TO CEASE AND DESIST IMMEDIATELY FROM CONTINUOUS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELANT AND FURTHER IMPERSONATING BY SJCC COURT ORDERS WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING IN THE APELLANT’S CAUSE,  A SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGE,  AND EVER ISSUING AS PERSONA SOL AGAIN, I.E. AS A  LEGAL PERSON SOLELY,  DELICT WARRANTS  AND SPURIOUS PROBATION ORDERS AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.   BY SAID COURT ORDER ALL ACCOMPLICES AFTER THE FACT OF JOHN LOVETT. PERSONA SOL, ARE ORDERED BY TSAID COURT TO CEASE AND DESIST – MONTGOMERY COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT- MC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SJC PROBATION DEPARTMENT RE: TRN 9160564229, APRIL 6TH 2017,,TDPS, JUDGE WAYNE MACK, JUSTICE COURT 1, MC COUNTY FROM CONTINUING TO UNLAWFULLY  ENFORCE ALL DELICT INVALID WARRANTS AND PROBATION ORDERS  BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, AGAINST THE APPELLANT  PURSUANT OF  THE APPELLANT’S FALSE ARREST AND UNLAWFUL JAILING PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, DERIVING FROM SAID ESTOPPEL SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT CAUSE NO. 2016-215- 2016 1ST DUI CAM 2/23/17  VOLO CONTENDERE FALSE CONVICTION, AND ILLEGAL IN ABSENTIA SENTENCING TO TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT FOR IST DUI AND PROBATION ORDER APRIL 6TH, 2017 BY SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING AS SHOWN BY SJCC RECORD DOCUMENT EVIDENCE (EXHIBIT).

 

 

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR,  SAID APPELLANT MAKES MOTION FOR COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION RE;  ESTOPPEL  NO. 1CC18542 DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID-DL- 4/13/2017 IN THE JUSTICE COURT PCT. 01, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS, JUDGE WAYNE L. MACK.ISSUING AND ENFORCING  ALL DELICT INVALID WARRANTS FOR FALSE ARREST AND UNLAWFUL JAILING OF THE APPELLANT UNDER “OUTSTANDING CASE” IN CONTEMPT OF MC COURT JUDGEMENT RE: ESTOPPEL CASE NO. 17-322548, MAY19, 2017, MOUNTGOMERY COUNT COURT, LAW FIVE,, CONROE, TEXAS, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO  (EXHIBIT) IN VIOLATION OF THE US CONSTITUTION’S DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE.

 

 

 

MOREOVER,  SAID APPELLANT MAKES MOTION FOR COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION  FROM RE: ALL DELICT WARRANTS FOR THE APPELLANT’S ARREST AND JAILING DERIVING FROM  A PRIMA FACIE  OBVIOUSLY ABSURD  SPECIOUSDEFERREDADJUDICATIONPROBATIONVIOLATIONS  UNCONSTITUTIONALLY SUPPRESSED AS EVIDENCE  EXONERATING THE APPELLENT BY SAID MAY 19TH MC COURT AT LAW FIVE RUSE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE AND DELETED FROM THE MAY 13TH AB INITIO CHARGES LEVELED  FALSELY AGAINST THE APPELLANT AND THEREBY AND UNCONSTITUTIONALLY  SAID EXONERATING AB INITIO CHARGE WAS NOT GIVEN A DUE PUBLIC HEARING IN A COURT OF LAW  NOR OFFICIALLY PROMULGATED IN SAID COURT RECORD ON MAY 19, 2016  IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S DUE PROCESS ET VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

 

SAID MAY 19TH MC COURT LAW FIVE ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE SET FORTH FOR HEARING IN COURT SOLELY  AB INITIO MAY 13TH CHARGE 1,)  DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID, AND SUPPRESSED UNLAWFULLY IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001  .2)  ENHANCING  CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION, AS A RESULT OF SAID SUPPRESSION AND DELETION OF .2) IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001,  IN PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 19TH, , SAID SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION  PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT CONTINUES IN FORCE, DE FACTO,  SAID SJC PROBATION DEPARTMENT DELICT WARRANT (EXHIBIT) FOR APPELLANT UNLAWFULLY DERIVES FROM FAILURE TO PAY PROBATION SURCHARGES-(EXHIBIT ) AND FAILURE TO ATTEND PROBATION MEETINGS RE: CAUSE NO. 2016-215- SJCC AND LOVETT, PERSONA SOL FEIGNING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND JUDICIAL STANDING DERIVING  FROM A FRAUDULENT, SPURIOUS, IN NOMINE SOLO,  IN NAME ONLY EXISTENT DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION  ORDER BY SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT,(EXHIBIT).

 

CONTINUED DEMANDS BEFORE AND AFTER MAY 19 RUSE COURT ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE OF PAYMENT OF PROBATION FEES BY THE APPELLANT CONSTITUTES  UNLAWFUL AND FRAUDULENT  EXTORTION  PERPETRATED UNDER COLOR OF LAW BY  SJC CSCD TERESA MILNER DIRECTOR AND LOREINA KLEVINSKI IN CONTEMPT OF A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 04/29/2017 (EXHIBIT ) HOLDING JOHN LOVETT’S SJSCS PROBATION ORDER APRIL 6TH 2017 AND ALL WARRANTS AND ORDERS BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL TO BE NULL AND VOID BECAUSE OF BREACH OF JUDICIAL STANDING BY LOVETT AND SJCC ACCOPLICES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD. SAID FRAUD IS EVIDENT IN  FALLACIOUS DATE OF  1ST DUI OFFENSE IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 SWORN BY LOVETT FALSELY TO BE CHRISMAS EVE   DECEMBER 24TH, 2015 ON LOVETT’S SPURIOUS APRIL 6TH, 2017 PROBATION ORDER (EXHIBIT) IN CONTRADICTION OF THE SAID TDPSHP DUI OFFENSE REPORT # TK4KYLOUTI5U (EXHIBIT ) AND THE  SAID INSTANTER DUI DATE OF APRIL 4TH, 2016, (EXHIBIT) AND LOVETT’S  INVALID DELICT MARCH 19TH 2017 EXTRADITION WARRANT OFFENSE DATE  DUI 2016/FAILURE TO APPEAR. THE APPELLANT, THEREBY CAN NOT BE INCRIMINATED BY ANY PHYSICAL EVIDENCE DERIVING ALLEGEDLY FROM SAID NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE OF MPM 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY  ON A MALICIOUSLY ANTI CATHOLIC  SWORN IN VIOLATION OF FCC1000 TO BE CHRISTMAS EVE, DECEMBER 24TH, 2015 DATE ALBEIT  “OPEN CONTAINER” PLANTED EVIDENCE AND SPURIOUS BAC BLOOD SAMPLE TDPSCF LAB BOTH MANUFACTURED AND SUPRRESSED AS POTENTIALLLY EXONERATING, VIOLATING THEREBY IN THE STATE OF TEXAS IN ALL DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION THE DUI DEFENDANT’S  WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE FROM A FALLACIOUS NON EXISTENT OFFENSE SITE VIOLATES THE IVTH, VTH, VITH AMENDMENTS AND TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE.

 

 

 

APPELLANT PRAY THE COURT ORDER THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RETURN FORTH WITH THE APPELLANT’S DRIVER’S LICENSE C/M AND CLD- A SOURCE OF APPELLANT’S LIVELIHOOD- UNLAWFULLY CONFISCATED FROM THE APPELLANT FOR UNDERSIGNED REFUSAL OF BAC TEST BLOOD SAMPLE IN A BY TDPSCURTAILED EXERCISE OF APPELLANT’S IVTH AND VTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. THE BLOOD SAMPLES WERE VIOLENTLY PIRATED UNDER TORTUOUS DURESS AND IMPRISONMENT BY TDPS CONTRACTED EMPLOYEES AT CHI-ST. LUKE’S, LIVINGSTON TEXAS AROUND 11:00 P.M. APRIL 4TH, 2016  AS LAB “PROPS” FOR THE TDPS CRIMINAL FORENSIC’S CRIME LAB, HARRIS COUNTY UNLAWFULLY IN LEGALLY CONTRACTED COLLUSION WITH STAFFERS AT CHI ST. LUKE’S LIVINGSTON, TEXAS ON THE NIGHT OF APRIL 4TH, 2016 NOT WITHSTANDING MORAL OBJECTIONS BY THE APPELLANT FULLY CONSCIOUS IN THE ATTEMPTED EXERCISE OF HIS CIVIL AND GENEVA CONVENTION RIGHTS NOT TO BE EXPERIMENTED UPON IN AN INCRIMINATING WAY BY TDPS CONTRACTED EMPLOYEES AT CHI-ST.LUKE’S AS A PRISONER AGAINST HIS UNDERSIGNED BAC REFUSAL,  PIRATING, WITH NO PROBABLY CAUSE AT THE TIME GIVEN IN REPORT BY BILLY CORELY,  THE APPELLANT OBSERVED BY CORELY OR ATTESTED TO BY CORLEY AS DUI +.231, THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT,  BEING REPORTED BY BILLY CORELY IN SAID DUI OFFENSE REPORT,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PIRATING, THE APPELLANT’S BLOOD TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT OF 1ST  DUI CLASS A MISDEMEANOR, ENHANCED BAC +.15 IN SJCC, JOHN LOVET PRESIDING PERSONA SOL

 

 

A CRIMINAL ELEMENT, SINE QUA NON OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD IS THE UNCONSTITUIONAL 2003 TEXAS DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM. SAID EXTRA JUDICIAL EXTORTION RACKET VIA TDPS SUSPENDED THE APPELLANT’S C/M AND CDL LICENSE FOR IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE CONSTITUIONAL BAC BLOOD SAMPLE REFUSAL ACCORDING TO TEXAS BAC REFUSAL LAW- BLOOD SAMPLES FOR TDPS BAC TESTING CAN NOT BE TAKEN WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE- BILLY CORLEY’S SAID DUI OFFENSE REPORT DOES NOT TESTIFY TO ANY PRIME INDICATORS OF PROBABLY CAUSE OF .231 BAC. THE APPELLANT’S CASE IS AN EXEMPLAR CASE IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT, AND TDPS CURRENTLY HAS SUSPENDED 1.3 MILLION C/B/M LICENSES IN TEXAS IN VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS AND THE VITH AMENDMENT VIA THE 2003 TEXAS DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM FOR FAILURE TO PAY 1.8 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR UNLAWFULLY ASSESSED AS “A DOUBLE TAX” EXTORTED BY TDPS AS EXTRA LEGAL “SURCHARGES” IN VIOLATION OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THE VIIITH AMENDMENT- BILL OF PAIN AND PENALTIES TRIGGERED MOSTLY BY THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL  FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT . ALL SAID IS UNDERHANDED “CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE” BY ANOTHER INNOCUOUS NAME. IN A RECENT HOUSTON CHRONICLE POLL, TEXANS OPPOSE “CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE” BY 89% AGAINST, 4% FOR, 7% UNDECIDED. MOREOVER, SAID REGRESSIVE “DOUBLE TAX” IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE PUNISHES THE POOR MORE THAN THE RICH BY INABILITY TO PAY GOVERNMENT EXTORTION, AND BY INABILITY TO PAY SAID EXTORTION HAVE DRIVERS LICENSE SUSPENDED, AND IF STOPPED AND ARRESTED BEING JAILED INDEFINITELY UNTIL EXCESSIVE “SURCHARGES” ARE PAID, A VIOLATION OF THE VIIITH AMENDMENT NO EXCESSIVE BAIL CLAUSE. ALSO WHILE IN PRISON, THEREBY, VICTIMS OF THIS MAILICIOUS GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION FRAUD ARE DENIED THEIR VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO LEGAL COUNSEL. THE KATY COUNTY OF TEXAS IS CURRENTLY BEING SUED BY THE ACLU FOR VIOLATION UNDER COLOR OF LAW OF TEXAN’S CIVIL RIGHTS FOR OPERATING A “DEBTORS PRISON” VIA THE 2003 TEXAS DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM.

 

POIGNANTLY,THE TEXAS ADMINISTRATION TRANSPORTATION CODE, SB 970 “LIMITS THE MISSION” OF THE TDPS TO REGULATE COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORT (CLASS A/ CDL DRIVERS LICENSE) AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT INSECPTION  ALONE AND RURAL HIGHWAYS. BUT IN CRIMINAL VIOLATION OF  SAID TRANSPORTATION CODE LIMITS ON TDPS MISSION THE TDPS AS UNLAWFUL ENFORCER OF  2003 TEXAS DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM/ARL  HAS SUSPENDED 1.1 MILLION  NON PROFESSIONAL CLASS A/CDL DRIVERS LICENSES FOR FAILURE TO PAY 1.6 BILLION IN GOVERNMENT EXTORTION A YEAR AS A PRIME CRIMINAL ELEMENT OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

ANOTHER PRIME ELEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT VIA TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD EXTORTION ARE FINES AND TDPS SURCHARGES FOR DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS:

 

Financially there are fines, up to $2,000, or $4,000, or $10,000 depending if it’s a misdemeanor or a felony that you have to pay as a fine as punishment in the case. You have to pay probation fees every month which can be anywhere from $60 to $80. You have to pay for an identification card. You have to pay for the urine analysis which is done every month. You have to pay for the court costs, which are about $400 just for a misdemeanor DWI.

You have to pay for interlock costs, which it’s about $90 a month. If you just took probation for a first offense DWI, you are looking at $300 or $400 a month just for a first offense DWI misdemeanor probation, and then there’s a $1,000 a year surcharge to DPS for 3 years, and they’ll do © 2015 Tyler Flood Page 70. WHAT EVERY DRIVER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT DUI.

 

MOREOVER:

,

THERE ARE DEFENSE ATTORNEY FEES- $15,000 TO BE DEFENDED AND ACQUITTED BY A DUI ATTORNEY EVEN IF YOU ARE OBJECTIVELY GUILTY OF DUI AT THE TIME OF YOUR ARREST.

 

99% of the attorneys out there that are taking people’s money and handling DWIs do not know what they are doing. They mostly plead clients out routinely. These attorneys seldom go to trial. If the client wishes to fight their case, the attorneys will charge them an extra fee to fight it! The client is left wondering why they hired that attorney in the first place 2015 TYLER FLOOD PAGE 22, WHAT EVERY DRIVER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT DUI AT THE TIME OF YOUR ARREST.

 

INCREASED INSURANCE PREMIUMS IF CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS

 

LOST INCOME, AND OR JOB FROM IMPRISONMENT, OR LIVELIHOOD IN ILLEGAL CONFISCATION OF BOTH COMMERCIAL AND NON COMMERCIAL LICENSES VIA ARL.

 

LOSS OF A PRIMARY INDENTIFICATION DOCUMENT (DL) AND THEREFORE IDENTITY THEFT BY THE TDPS IN PERPETRATING THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

PUBLIC HUMILIATION OF YOUR NAME AND PICTURE APPEARING IN LOCAL “POLICE REPORTER” SCADAL SHEETS FOR DUI ARREST AT THE SAME TIME – INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY- THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIM IS DENIED PUBLIC HEARING AT P.C. COURT OF POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE FROM AN INDEPENDENT LAB BAC TEST COMPILED NO LESS OR ASAP AFTER DUI ARREST. DUI CONVICTION CANNOT BE EXPUNGED AND IS PERMANENT ON YOU CRIMINAL RECORD, UNLIKE ANYOTHER CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

 

THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  VICTIM IS EXTORTED $5OO TO $3,200( AT THIS POINTED THE VEHICLE IS AUCTIONED OR JUNKED BY CRONYS) TO HAVE HIS OR HER VEHICLE TOWED AND IMPOUNDED BY LOCAL CRONY TOWING COMPANIES, AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE,  WHERE THE TOWING COMPANY, EAST-TEX TOWING,  WROTE THE NON-EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE MPM 450 I-59 ON THE TOWING AND IMPOUND CHARGES INVOICE.

 

 

 

 

THE PENAL STATE, ESPECIALLY FOR SMALL RURAL JAILS LIKE SJC JAIL IS LUCRATIVE FOR ALL PRACTITIONER’S OF TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, ESPECIALLY LOCAL SHERIFF DEPT. AND COUNTY COURTS AS WELL AS TDC STATE PENITENTIARIES.

 

For a first offense DWI, the range of punishment is 72 hours in jail up to 6 months in jail. That’s for a class B. If you have a .15 or higher BAC, then the state can amend it and raise it to a class A, which is higher, and then your range of punishment is 72 hours in jail up to one year in county jail, or up to two years’ probation for either one of those two scenarios. 2015 TYLER FLOOD PAGE 22, WHAT EVERY DRIVER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT DUI AT THE TIME OF YOUR ARREST TYLER

 

 

TO THE END OF FILLING THE FACILITIES PERPETUALLY WITH NON VIOLENT OFFENDERS AS A PRIME ELEMENT IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  ALL TDPSFC LAB BAC REPORTS ISSUED  WITHIN  MONTH’S END AND WITHOUT EXCEPTION ARE ARBITRARY PEGGED AT +.15 BAC TO ENHANCE DUI GUILTY CONVICTION- AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE- FROM CLASS B TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR AND AFTER TWO SUCH CAM DUI CONVICTIONS, ENHANCED STATE FELONY. SAID FAUDULENT PRACTICE CANNOT BE PERPETRATED  BY THE BREATHELIZER TEST WHICH IS CONDUCTED BY THE ARRESTING DUI OFFICER AT DUI OFFENSE SITE WITHIN AN HOUR OF DUI SUSPECT ARREST. THE FIELD SOBRIETY BREATHELIZER IS NOT ADMISSIBLE IN COURT, BUT IS PROBABLE CAUSE FOR DUI ARREST. THE BREATHELIZER RESULT IS IMMEDIATE AND CONVEYED RIGHTLY TO THE DUI SUSPECT WHO THEN IS EITHER RELEASED FOR -.08 AND IS NOT SHOWING DUI RELATED BAC INTOXICATION IMPAIRMENT OF MENTAL AND PHYSICAL FACULTIES EVEN IF AT -.08 BAC BY BREATHELIZER, OR ARRESTED WITH DUI PROBABLY CAUSE. BREATHELIZER TO THEN TAKE ANOTHER ADMISSIBLE BREATHELIZER MACHINE BAC TEST. FOR ALL THESE SAID REASONS, THE BREATHELIZER DUI BAC REGIMEN IS INFINITELY PREFERABLE AND CONSTITUTIONALLY SUPERIOR TO BAC PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE UNCONSTITUIONAL TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. THE BAC PIRATED BLOOD PROP TDPSCF LAB REPORT IS MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE AND SIMULTANEOUSLY SUPPRESSED OXNORATING DUI BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE, AS BOTH IS SINE QUA NON IN THE PERPETERATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, THE FIELD SOBRIETY BEATHELIZER HAS BEEN “OBSOLETED” FOR THE MOST PART IN TEXAS FOR THIS REASON, BUT SHOULD BE BROUGHT BACK PERHAPS.

 

 

Percentage wise, probably 70% of DWI defendants have pretty high BACs. Does that always mean that the BAC number is accurate? Absolutely not! Blood cases tend to be higher than breath tests. The cause for that is somewhat unknown and even judges question on why blood draw results are higher than breath test results. It seems that the BAC should be the same whether you blow or if they draw your blood. 2015 TYLER FLOOD PAGE 22, WHAT EVERY DRIVER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT DUI AT THE TIME OF YOUR ARREST.

 

LOGICALLY THE FIELD SOBRIETY BREATHELIZER TEST MUST BE TWO TO THREE DRINKS HIGHER THAN THE BAC CHROMATOGRAPHY MACHINE TEST DONE 2 TO 3 HOURS AFTER DUI ARREST AT CHI-ST. LUKES, THEREFORE SUBTRACTING TWO TO THREE DRINKS FROM THE BAC TEST RESULTS.  SAID FACT PROVES BASED ON AN INEXORABLE MATRIX EFFECT BETWEEN SPITTLE ALCOHOL IN THE BREATHELIZER AND WATER ALCOHOL OR BLOOD ALCOHOL  TDPSCF LAB FRAUD IN MANUFACTURING IN EVERY TDPSFC LAB REPORT BAC +.15 TO ENHANCE

 

 

 

 

 

MOREOVER,

 

DISCOVERY IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE IMPLICATES BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT SAID UNLAWFUL SEIZING OF BLOOD SAMPLES FROM ALL DUI SUSPECTS IN ALL CASES THROUGHOUT TEXAS ARE A MERE PROP TO BE USED IN TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FORENSIC’S  CRIME LAB, HARRIS COUNTY’S MANUFACTURE  EVIDENCE OF BLOOD ALCOHOL CONTENT (BAC) FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF DUI SUSPECTS TO FALSELY INCRIMINATE THEM OF A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR ENHANCED BY A BOGUS  +.15 BAC TDPSCF LAB SELF VERIFYING REPORT AS EVIDENT IN THE APPELLANT CASE IN DENIAL OF THEIR IVTH AND VTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AS WELL AS GENEVA CONVENTION RIGHTS UNDER  COLOR OF LAW  IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.  PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES BY CHI ST. LUKE TDPS CONTRACTED EMPLOYEES AND TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD ARE A SINE QUA NON NO BAC REFUSAL SIGNED OR NOT SIGNED FOR ANY REASON ALWAYS 100% OF THE TIME TAKEN WITH NOT ONE EXCEPTION, USED TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT AND ALL DUI SUSPECTS IN TEXAS IN PERPETRATION OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

APPELLANT PRAYS COURT ORDER FOR EQUITABLE REDRESS AGAINST TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND COMMISSIONERS TO PAY JUDGEMENT FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY SAID CRIMINAL MANNER FOR FALSE JAILING IN SUPPRESSION OF BLOOD SAMPLE EXONERATING EVIDENCE BY THE TDPSCF LAB TILL PATENTLY BOGUS BAC REPORT ISSUED APRIL 25TH, 2016  AND A SECOND JUDGEMENT  FOR ALL HARM DONE TO THE APPELLANT IN ILLEGALLY CONFISCATING THE APPELLANTS C/M DRIVING LICENSE FOR BLOOD SAMPLE REFUSAL IN VIOLATION OF THE 2003 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY’S GOOD DRIVERS PROGRAM LIMITED TO CDL CONFISCATION ALONE, ENHANCED BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

6)NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SUIT REPRESENTING ALL ANYONE IN TEXAS INJURED IN LIFE, HAPPINESS, AND LIBERTY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD

 

 

 

BY SAID DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN TEXAS TO FALSELY CONVICTION VIA TDPSCF LAB REPORT BAC MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE  AND SUPRESSED BAC POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLES AT BAC OO. –O8, AND -.15  BY THE TDPSCF LAB HARRIS COUNTY SPURIOUSLY DUE TO “LAB BACK LOG.”  IN TANDEM WITH THE 2003 SAFE DRIVING ACT AND LICENSE REVOCATION LAW BY UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIOLATION OF SAID CLASS ACTION PLAINTIFFS’ IVTH, VTH, VITH, VIIITH, XVIIITH, AND XXITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS SAID APPEAL AND PETITION PRAYING WRIT OF MANDAMUS BY THE APPELLANT SERVES AS AN EXEMPLAR CASE IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT. ALL PLAINTIFF LEGAL STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT TO BE ESTABLISHED ACCORDINGLY, THEREBY.

 

 

Uncertainty of Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Results as

Related to Instrumental Conditions: Optimization and

Robustness of BAC Analysis Headspace Parameters

Haleigh A. Boswell and Frank L. Dorman

 

MOREOVER, ALL TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORTS FOR DUI PROSECUTION ARE SELF CERTIFIED AT “% 99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” OF BAC DEGREE ACCURACY IN THEIR BAC TESTING RESULTS BRANDISHED AT THE APPELLANT’S TRIAL OR OVERWHELMINGLY IN “PLEA BARGAINING” TO GET DUI GUILTY CONVICTIONS IN 99.7 OF CASES IN TEXAS PLAYING ON THE TDPSCD/P VICTIM’S COMPLETE IGNORANCE OF THE BAC TEST AND IT’S TRUE ACCURACY. THE ABOVE REPORT DONE IN 2015 TO ACHIEVE THE MOST EXACTING PRECISE RESULTS COMPARING AND CONTRASTING HEAD SPACE TEMPURATURES, PRESCINDING THE INEXORABLE MATRIX EFFECT ACCURACY VERIATIONS , OF BLOOD OR WATER ALCOHOL, WITH THE BAC CHROMATOGRAPHY MACHINE IN OPTIMAL OPERATING CONDITION, REGISTERED A 99% CONFIDENCE LEVEL OF ACCURENCY. TDPSFC LAB IN 100% OF THEIR BAC TESTING WITH THEIR DOCUMENTED LACK OF BAC MACHINE CALIBRATION, STILL SWEARS ON 100% OF ALL REPORTS TDPSCF LAB BAC TESTING IS ALWAYS %99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL OR  % .7  GREATER THAN THEIR PERFECT RESULT UNDER THE OPTIMAL SETTINGS REPORTED IN THIS SCIENTIFIC STUDY.  ONE MIGHT SAY, COME ON, IT’S ONLY  %.7 PERCENT DIFFERNCE.  BUT CONSIDERING ONE IS GUILTY OF DUI AT .O8 BAC WHICH IS HUGELY LOWER THAN %.7 BAC- AT .7 A NORMAL HUMAN IS DEAD FROM ALCOHOL POISONING MANY TIMES OVER, THE %.7 ADD ON IN ACCURACY IS DAMING IN ASSURING DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS.

 

The chromatographic performance of the analytes was the main concern in the alteration of the

headspace parameters. Variations in sample preparation were of no interest in this analysis.

Chromatographic resolution and peak shape are vital in determining peak area for quantification of blood

alcohol determination. With minor alterations of few headspace parameters, the accuracy and precision

of the alcohol concentration can be drastically altered. Determining the optimal parameters are of utmost

importance to achieve the most robust and precise analysis. Therefore, it is recommended from these

data that the headspace oven temperature for this instrumentation be set to 85 °C, with a headspace vial

pressurization of 15 psi, for the best overall performance.

 

TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY, DOES NOT IN ANY WAY FOLLOW THIS EXACTING BAC TESTING REGIMEN.  AND EVEN IF THEY DID, THEY DON’T AS 1400 COURT CASES SHOW, THE TDPS FORENSIC CRIME LAB BAC TEST REPORTS COULD ONLY REPORT A %99 NOT A “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” IN BAC TEST ACCURANCY.

 

.

 

 

 

7)THE APPELLANT PRAYS SAID COURT FOR PROTECTON AND PURSUANT OF EQUITABLE REDRESS AND RELIEF FROM FURTHER TORTS BY JOHN LOVETT AND SJC ACCOMPLICES TO IINDICT FOR ALL SAID FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS WITH PROBABLY CAUSE THE FOLLOWING FALSELY AND MALICIOUSLY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT, 2/23/17 SJCC CAUSE NO. 2016 -215-, IST DUI, ENHANCED TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR VIA TDPSCFL BAC REPORT AT +.15 BAC PURSUANT OF THE APPELLANT’S FALSE ARREST AND JAILING FOR 365 DAYS TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT IN THE SJC JAIL WITHOUT PROBATION.

 

IN FALSELY AND MALICIOUSLY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT ON 2/23/17, ALL SAID, CONVICTED THEMSELVES OF ALL SAID FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS. RES IPSO IGITUR, IN THE INTEREST OF THE PROTECTION OF SOCIETY PURSUANT OF JUSTICE, THE APPELLANT FOR COMMISSION OF ALL SAID CRIMES PRAY THE COURT TO ORDER WARRANTS FOR THE ARREST OF ALL SAID CRIMINAL MALEFACTORS:

 

 

John Lovett Jr.           

1 State Hwy 150, Room 23
Coldspring, TX 77331

Phone: 936-653-2199
Fax: 936-653-3970
Office Hours 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.
Monday thru Friday

 

Mark A. Boemio
First Assistant District Attorney, SJC

Christina T. Wood
Assistant District Attorney, SJC

 

1 State Hwy 150, Room 21
Coldspring, TX 77331
Phone: 936-653-2601

 

Judge Earnest L. McClendon
258th District Court
101 West Mill Street Ste. 286 Livingston, Texas 77351

Phone: 936-327-6847
Fax: 936-327-6881

 

 

BILLY CORLEY,

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

5500 FM 2025 COLDSPRING, TEXAS 77331

 

TEL.: (936) 653-2173, FAX: (936) 653-3460

 

JESSE SLAUGHTER

SAN JACINTO COUNTY SHERRIFF’S OFFICE

75 W. CEDAR AVENUE

COLDSPRING, TEXAS 77331

TEL.: (936) 653-4367

FAX. 99360 653-4588

 

DANNY VANDERMAN, REGISTERED NURSE

CHI-ST. LUKE’S MEMORIAL LIVINGSTON

1717 HIGHWAY 59 LOOP N.

LIVINGSTON, TX 77351

TEL.: (936) 329-8700

 

RAUCHEL AUBEL, FORENSIC SCIENTIST, EXPERT WITNESS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CRIME LABORATORY

12230 WEST RD.

BUILDING C

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77065

 

CARDINAL DANIEL DINARDO, ARCHBISHOP OF GALVESTON/HOUSTON

CHI-ST. LUKE’S ETHICAL MEDICAL POLICY HEAD AND CORPORATE PARTNER.

1700 SAN JACINTO, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77001-0907

 

ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT:

 

IN CONTEMPT OF ORDER TO CEASE AND TO DESIST, 04/29/2017 FROM WARRANTING THE FALSE INPRISONMENT OF THE APPELLANT RE: 2016 -215-

 

THERESA MILNER, DIRECTOR

SAN JACINTO COUNTY COMMUNITY SUPERVISION AND CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT

 

LOREINA KLEVINSKI, OFFICER 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7) CALL FOR HONORABLE JUDGE TO IMPANEL A GRAND JURY IN TEXAS TO INVESTIGATE AND INDICT WITH PROBABLY CAUSE  FORTEXAS  GOVERNMENT/TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND POLICE  CORRUPTION REVENUE FRAUD VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF DUI/POM

 

.

 

8) MOTION MADE FOR STATUS OF APPEAL AND PETITION COURT HEARING

 

 

 

 

FACTUAL BASIS OF GROUNDS FOR SAID APPEAL AND PETITION OF MANDAMUS 

 

RE: CASE NO. 17-322548, MAY19, 2017, MONTGOMERY COUNT COURT, LAW FIVE DISMISSED “IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE” BY ORDER OF ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO, AN ESTOPPEL OF SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT CAUSE NO. 2016-215- 2016 1ST DUI CAM 2/23/17 CONVICTION AND SENTENCING AND PROBATION ORDER BY SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT, APRIL 6TH, 2017, AND AN ESTOPPEL NO. 1CC18542 DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID-DL-CONVICTION  4/13/2017 IN THE JUSTICE COURT PCT. 01, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS, JUDGE WAYNE L. MACK.

 

 

FIRST, ON MARCH 13TH, AND AGAIN ON MAY 13TH, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT DEPUTIES AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, AT LAW 5, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO, GIVING NO  DUE DILIGENCE TO FACT, NOR JURISPRUDENCE SHOWN ADJUDICATING  THE VALIDITY OF 2016 DUI/ FAILURE TO APPEAR EXTRADITION WARRANT ORDERED UNLAWFULLY BY JOHN LOVETT AS PERSONA SOL,IN SPITE OF THE APPELLANT LATER OBJECTING AT SO CALLED P.C. COURT, MC COURT AT LAW FIVE TO SAID PAUL DAMICO PRESIDING AT HEARING, HIS TRANSPORTATION RIGHTS ARE BEING VIOLATED BY SAID COURT AND “JOHN LOVETT IS MALICOUSLY PROSECUTING ME,” THERE BY. WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING UNLAWFULLY IMPERSONATING A SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGE, AND  IN SPITE OF REPEATED IN HEARING OBJECTIONS  BY THE APPELLANT TO SAID INVALID DELICT EXTRADITION WARRANT ENFORCEMENT, HAVING TRIED SEVERAL TIMES TO  INFORM  MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPUTIES OF MCJ OF  SAID EXTRADITION WARRANT’S INVALIDITY AND THEREFORE UNLAWFULNESS TO ENFORCE, WAS NONETHELESS FALSELY ARRESTED AND JAILED IN MC JAIL UNLAWFULLY ENFORCING  SAID  2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR DELICT WARRANT ORDERED BY JOHN LOVETT PERSONA SOL, APRIL 6TH, 2017, FOR THE APPELLANT’S ARREST AND TO BE JAILED WITHOUT BAIL AT MCJ AND HENCE  UNLAWFULLY BY SAID DELICT EXTRADITION WARRANT  BE TRANSPORTED MANACLED TO SJC JAIL IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND TRANSPORTATION RIGHTS BY SAID COURT AND JUDGE, AND BEING EXTRADITED TO SJC JAIL  JAILED FOR 365 DAYS- TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT FOR 1ST DUI BY ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT PERSONA SOL. ON MARCH 14TH, IN  SO CALLED PROBABLE CAUSE COURT HEARING AT LAW FIVE, MC COURT, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO,  IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SUSTAINED AND ENFORCED SAID INVALID DELICT WARRANT IN SPITE OF THE APPELLANT’S, THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE’S LEGAL SPOKEN OBJECTIONS AGAINST THE WARRANT’S LAWFULNESS.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, AB INITIO MARCH 13TH, 2017, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT DEPUTIES AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, LAW 5, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO, DID NOT GIVE DUE LAW ENFORCEMENT DILIGENCE NOR SHOW JURISPRUDENCE ADJUDICATING THE VALIDITY OF SAID 2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT RE: ESTOPPEL SJCC 2016 215  EXTRADITION WARRANT BY ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT AS PERSONA SOL  WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING AS SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGE .   A SECOND TIME, AB INITIO MAY 13TH,2017 , AGAIN IN SO CALLED PROBABLE CAUSE COURT ACTING AS MCC AT  LAW FIVE, JUDGE DAMICO OVER RULED  THE APPELLANT’S REASONABLE,  LAWFUL, OBJECTIONS AND DISMISSED FACTUAL GROUNDS  OBJECTION TO THE VALIDITY AND LAWFULNESS OF SAID OBVIOUSLY ABSURD SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT  AND LOVETT’S, PERSONA SOL,  ORDERED  2016 DUI CONVICITION SJCC 2/23/17 SANCTION OF SUSPENSION OF DRIVERS LICENSE RE: AN ESTOPPEL SJCC 2016 -215-   COURT IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. MOREOVER, AB INITIO, MARCH 13TH PROCESSING AT MCJ IN VIOLATION OF THE IVTH AND VITH AMENDMENT, THE APPELLANT WAS ALIENATED BY MC JAIL DEPUTIES OF IN HAND SJCC LEGAL DOCUMENTS EXONERATING THE APPELLANT OF ALL SAID CHARGES. BY SAID VIOLATIONS, SAID EXONERATING EVIDENCE OF ALL SAID CHARGES WAS DENIED THE APPELLANT BY THE MCSD DEPUTIES AT THE MC COURT PROBABLE CAUSE HEARING OF HIS EXONERATING LEGAL DOCUMENTS IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AB INITIO.

 

 

IPSO RES, IGITUR, MC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT DEPUTIES AND MC COURT, AT LAW FIVE, ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO, DID TWICE, AB INITIO MARCH 13, 2017, AND MAY 13, 2017 PLACED THE APPELLANT IN VIOLATION OF THE US CONSTITUTION SEC. 3  IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY,  AND FALSELY ARRESTED AND JAILED THE APPELLANT, AN INNOCENT AMERICAN CITIZEN UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIOLATION OF HIS CIVIL RIGHTS. THIS TORT IS ENHANCED BY THE CRIMINAL PRETEXT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN PERPETRATION OF TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD AND AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME SPECIFICALLY IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE BEING PERPETRATED AGAINST THE APPELLANT BY THE MCSD AT MCJ AND MC COURT AT LAW 5, ACTING AS JUDGE AS ACCESSARY AFTER THE FACT WITH VINCIBLE IGNORANCE.

 

MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT DEPUTIES AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, LAW 5, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO  TWICE ON MARCH 13, 2017 AND MAY 13, 2017  CANNOT PLEAD INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE IN ACCESSARY  AFTER THE FACT  IN THE FACE OF THE APPELLANT’S  TWO IN COURT HEARINGS AT LAW FIVE, FACTUAL LEGAL OBJECTIONS AS DEFENDANT PRO SE  TO VIOLATION OF HIS WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY SAID DELICT INVALID WARRANT AND SPURIOUS PROBATION ORDERS BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL,  BUT ALL SAID, ARE CULPABLY “LEAD ON” BY JOHN LOVETT’S MALICIOUS CRIMINAL EXTRA JUDICIAL RUSES AND RES IPSO IGITUR COMPLICIT ACCOMPLICES  AS ACCESARY AFTER THE FACT, COMPLICIT IN TEXAS GOVERNMENT/ POLICE CORRUPTION DUI FALSE CONVICTION RACKET OF THE APPELLANT  IN THE PRETEXT OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY’S COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD,  IN TANDEM WITH THE 2003TEXAS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY DRIVER RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM 2003 SAFE DRIVING PROGRAM AND CIVIL LICENSE FORFEITURE PROGRAM.

DUI/POM FRAUD REVENUE RACKET CRIMINAL ELEMENTS.

 

MOREOVER, EXCLUSIVE OF ENHANCEMENT OF PERPETRATION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME, ANYONE AND ALL HAVE STANDING IN TEXAS AS PLAINTIFFS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT WHO EVER IS CONVICTED GUILTY BY THE STATE OF TEXAS VIA “PLEA BARGAINING” OR TRIAL  VIA  BY TDPSCF LAB  SUPPRESSED POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLY EVIDENCE AT THE SAME TIME USED AS LAB PROPS IN MANUFACTURE INCRIMINATING AND ENHANCING EVIDENCE SELF SPURIOUSLY CERTIFIED AT “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” (HOW ACCURATE IS BLOOD TESTING FOR ALCOHOL? NO ONE KNOWS FOR CERTAIN- OCTOBER 29, 2009, ARIZONA DUI DEFENSE BLOG) INHERENTLY FRAUDULENT TDPSFC LAB BAC REPORTS BASED ON SAID PROP BLOOD SAMPLES IN 100% OF ALL DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTIONS CASESIN TEXAS PIRATED UNDER DURESS BY TDPS AGENTS EVEN IN SPITE OF UNDERSIGNED REFUSAL, IN VIOLATION OF THE VTH AMENDMENT AND GENEVA CONVENTION

 

DECEPTIVELY CLAIMING A SCIENTIFICALLY UN VERIFIABLE  “99.7  CONFIDENCE  LEVEL”  A SELF CERTIFYING TAUTOLOGY  OF ALLEGED BAC TDPSFC LAB TEST REPORT ACCURACY ( A SPURIOUS DISTORTION OF FACTS) IS USED BY ASS. DA’S SUCH AS MARK BOEMIO AND CHRISTINA WOOD TO FALSELY CONVICT BY A LIED TO JURY DUI DEFENDANTS IN COURT, OR TO INTIMIDATE AND TO COERCE THEREBY GUILTY “PLEA BARGAINING” CONVICTIONS WHERE THE DUI DEFENDANT IS CONNED BY LYING ASS. DA’S INTO GIVING UP VI TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. ALL SAID IS SINE QUA NON  IN  THE COMMISSION OF TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD. AT SAID SPECIOUS “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL.”

 

 

IN 100% OF DUI PROSECUTION (MALICIOUS) CASES IN TEXAS, ALL DUI DEFENDANTS ARE DENIED THEIR 2012 STATE OF TEXAS MICHAEL MORTON RIGHTS TO A BLOOD EVIDENCE RETEST FOR PROBABLE CAUSE OF INVALIDITY BY THE TDPSCF LAB UNSPOKEN POLICY. SAID UNSPOKEN POLICY AS A SINEQUA NON, WITH NO EXCEPTIONS TO PROTECT THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD RACKET FROM EXPOSURE AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SUIT FOR FALSE JAILING BASED ON MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED BAC BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE. AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, THE APPELLANT’S PRIMA FACIE LUDICROUS TDPSCF LAB SELF CERTIFIED REPORT BY RACHEL AUBEL SWORN TO BE  231 BAC (APRX. 3x THE LEGAL LIMIT OF O8) IN A TEXAS COURT OF LAW IS DENIED RETESTING BY SAID SAME LAB FOR VALIDITY, IN RESTESTING  TO BE DONE BY THE SAME  RACHEL AUBEL A TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST TECHNICIAN WHO AFTER FIRST SUPPRESSING THE APPELLANT’S EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE FOR ALMOST A MONTH, APRIL 4TH TO 29TH, 2017, AT TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY, IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO A SPEEDY TRIAL WITH NO SUPPRESSION OF POTENTIALLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE BY STATE PROSECUTORS TO BE CONVICTED GUILTY,  ISSUED  APRIL 29, 2016 SAID OBVIOUSLY LUDICROUS MANUFACTURED  .231 BAC TEST RESULTS REPORT AS MANUFACTURED INCRIMINATING  TDPSCF LAB BAC “EVIDENCE”  MALICIOUSLY  LEVELLED AT THE APPELLANT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD SCAM.  SAID RETESTING IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE  IS WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE REJECTED   BY JOHN LOVETT ON JANUARY 9TH, 2017 IN DISCOVERY IN STRICT ADHERENSE TO TDPSCF LAB NO RETEST DE FACTO POLICY.IN  VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S  AND EVERYONE IN  TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI THEREBY’ 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHT TO HAVE “FOR THE SAKE OF JUSTICE, NOT CONVICTION” DNA EVIDENCE OF WHICH BLOOD SAMPLES ARE PAR EXCELLENCE RETESTED BY THE SAME TDPSCF LAB BAC TECHNICIAN WHO UNDERSIGNED THE SELF CERTIFED ALLEGED BAC TEST GRADE AB INITIO..

 

ON JANUARY 9TH, IN DISCOVERY COURT SJCC, ASS. DA MARK BOEMIO VIOLENTLY OBJECTED TO THE MOTION BY THE APPELLANT FOR A COURT ORDER BY SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT FOR SAID RESTESTING. BOEMIO, WHO LIED PREVIOUSLY IN EARLY MAY, 2016  TO THE APPELLANT ABOUT THE RIGHT IN OUR SYSTEM TO RETEST BAC RESULTS IN AN UNSOLICITED DUI PLEA BARGAIN OVER THE PHONE,  STATED IN COURT HEARING  BEFORE LOVETT THE TDPSCF LAB REFUSES IN ALL CASES THEY WERE REQUESTED ALLEGEDLY BY THE SJCC TO HAVE A DISPUTED BAC REPORT RESULT RETESTED BY THE BAC TEST TECHICIAN WHO ISSUED THE REPORT IN THE HARRIS COUNTY FACILITY.

 

SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT, WHO AT THIS JUNCTURE DID HAVE CONSTITIONAL AND STATE JUDICIAL STANDING TO GRANT THE APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR A TDPSCF LAB RETEST PURSUANT OF THE MICHAEL MORTON LAW, HAD ENCOURAGED THE APPELLANT IN A PREVIOUS DISCOVERY HEARING TO WRITE A COURT ORDER LOVETT WOUL ENDORSE FOR A BAC RETEST ONLY BY A NON TDPS “INDEPENDENT LAB.”  THE APPELLANT, AT FIRST IN ACCORD, SOON REALIZED THIS STIPULATION TO BE  AN OBVIOUS COVER UP TO GUARD AGAINST SELF INCRIMINATION AND EXPOSURE BY THEIR OWN HANDS  THE FRAUDULENT, CRIMINAL  NATURE ON MANY LEVELS OF THE TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORTS  SINE QUA NON IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF TDPS DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION REVENUE FRAUD.  THE INDEPENDENT LAB RETEST WOULD NOT BE SELF CERTIFIED AS 99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL THUS DEEMED INFERIOR PER SE TO TDPSFCL REPORT RESULTS. MOREOVER, UNLIKE ANY INDEPENDENT LAB, THE TDPSCF LAB BAC PROCEDURE IS SANCTIONED BY THE SJCC COURT, AND IS LESS EXPENSIVE, THE BLOOD SAMPLE WOULD NOT HAVE TO BE SPLIT, AND THE BAC TECHNICIAN-UNKNOWN- WOULD NOT HAVE TO BE SUB PEONA AS EXPERT WITNESS AND EXAMINED ABOUT PROCEDURE. ALL ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT’S MOTION TO RETEST BY RACHEL AUBEL. AN INDEPENDENT LAB BAC RESULT CAN BE CREDITED AS INJECTING A REASONABLE DOUBT ABOUT THE VERACITY OF THE TDPSFC LAB RESULT AND NO ADMITTING NO WRONG DOING, THE TDPSCF LAB IS LET OFF THE HOOK TO DEFRAUD AND FALSELY CONVICT THE NAÏVE ANOTHER DAY.

 

AS SUCH, ALL AND ANY ONE, THEREBY, GAIN STANDING AS PLAINTIFFS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT, CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS WITH TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORTS IN ALL DUI CASES BY UNSPOKEN POLICY-CONSPIRACY- SINE QUA NON IN COMMISSION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  DENIED THEIR 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS TO RETEST FOR VALIDITY WITH PROBABLE CAUSE DNA/BAC BLOOD SAMPLES PURSUANT OF JUSTICE AND NOT CONVICTIONS. AND BY THE SAME NOT RETESTED BY TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT UNDER SIGNER  IS IN EVERY DUI CASE IN TEXAS, THE DUI GUILTY CONVICTS’ VTH AND VITH AMENDMENTS  AS WELL AS THE TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE IS VIOLATED.

 

ON 2/23/17, SJC COURT, THE APPELLANT’S MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS VIOLATED, TEXAS STATE PROSECUTION BAC TEST AND REPORT STATE EXPERT WITNESS SAID RACHEL AUBEL UNDER OATH IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 AFFIRMED AND CONFIRMED APRIL 29TH, 2017, BAC TOXICOLOGY REPORT FRAUDULENTLY LIKED TO THE APPELLANT AS ALLEGEDLY ACCURATE AT “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” (HOW ACCURATE IS BLOOD TESTING FOR ALCOHOL? IN TRUTH NO KNOWS FOR SURE, OCTOBER 29, 2009 ARIZONA DUI DEFENSE BLOG) BY AUBEL.  SAID TESTIMONY BY AUBEL UNDER OATH IN SJCC THAT DAY IN SJCC LEAD TO +.15 BAC  ENHANCEMENT  OF 1ST DUI TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR FALSE CONVICTION OF THE APPELLANT IN AB SENTIA AND UNLAWFUL JAILING IN SAN JACINTO COUNTY JAIL FOR 365 DAYS (TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT) WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION,  BY  SENTENCING ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT, ISSUED IN VIOLATION  OF  TEXAS SENTENCING LAW,  SENTENCING APPELLANT  IN ABSENTIA, AND TO TWICE THE LEGAL SENTENCING LIMIT.

 

 

TO CONTINUE

 

FIRST BEGINNING WITH THE APPELLANT’S FALSE ARREST ON MARCH 13TH,  MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT DEPUTIES AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, LAW 5, ACTING JUDGE PAUL DAMICO, WITHOUT DUE DILIGENCE TO FACT AND JURISPRUDENCE IN ADJUDICATION CULPABLE OF VINCIBLE IGNORANCE,  UNLAWFULLY ENFORCED SAID DELICT INVALID 2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT EXTRADITION WARRANT,  FRAUDULENTLY AND MALICIOUSLY ORDERED APRIL 6TH,  BY JOHN LOVETT AS PERSONA SOL, WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING, RES IPSO IGITUR CRIMINALLY IMPERSONATING A SJCC JUDGE,  AND FALSELY JAILED SAID APPELLANT IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL DERIVING FROM 2/23/17 2016 DUI (FALSE CONVICTION IN ABSENTIA (EXHIBIT), SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT, JUDGE JOHN LOVETT PERSONA SOL  PRESIDING, UNLAWFULLY PURSUANT OF  SENTENCING AND PROBATION ORDER, APRIL 6TH, 2017, UNLAWFULLY ORDERED BY JOHN LOVET, PERSONA SOL, WITHOUT LAWFUL JUDICIAL STANDING RE: CAUSE NO: 2016 -215- SJCC, 2/23/2017.

 

 

ON MARCH 13TH, MOREOVER,  THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY HIGHWAY PATROL, OFFICER  ACCOMPLICE BEFORE THE FACT, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL, AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT,AT  LAW  5,  UNLAWFULLY PROSECUTED SAID DELICT INVALID SPECIOUS AND MALICIOUS  EXTRAITION WARRANT ISSUED APRIL 6TH, 2017 WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING BY JOHN LOVETT AS PERSONA SOL (EXHIBIT ), AND  FALSELY ARRESTED APPELLANT IN THE COURT OF JUDGE WAYNE MACK. AFTER THE APPELLANT’S FALSE CONVICTION IN SAID ESTOPPEL CASE.

 

 

ON MAY 13 AB INITIO, FOR THE SECOND TIME, PLACING THE APPELLANT IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY,  THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL, AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, LAW  5, PAUL DAMICO ACTING AS JUDGE, WITH NO DUE  DILIGENCE TO FACT NOR JURISPRUDENCE  CULPABLE OF VINCIBLE IGNORANCE UNLAWFULLY PROSECUTED  AN OBVIOUSLY A PRIMA FACIE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE COVER UP  LUDICROUS RUSE BY JOHN LOVETT OF AN IN NAME ONLY EXISTENT DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT AND ASSOCIATES TO COVER UP AB INITO MALICIOUS PROSECUTION 2/23/17 FALSE DUI CONVICTION COMMITTED AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN FALSELY CONVICTING AND SENTENCING THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE FOR SAID 2/23/17 FALSE CONVICTION  IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS’  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, ILLEGALLY  IN ABSENTIA ON 2/23/17.

FOR  A SECOND TIME,   THE APPELLANT’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO NOT BE PLACED IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY FOR THE SAME OFFENSE RE: 2016 -215-  2/23/17 DUI FALSE CONVICTION SJCC WERE VIOLATED AS ACCESORY AFTER THE FACT CULPABLE OF VINCIBLE IGNORANCE BY MCJ AND MC COURT, AT LAW 5, ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO LEAD ON BY LOVETT’S COVER UP A PRIMA FACIE ABSURD DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION RUSE TO COVER LOVETT’S TRACKS TO SAID 2/23/17 FALSE DUI CONVICTION IN ABSENTIA OF THE APPELLANT.

 

AS A COVER UP, OR OVER, TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE LOVETT ISSUED TWO CONTRADICTORY PROBATION ORDERS BOTH WITHOUT THE FOREKNOWLEDGE OR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPELLANT IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S DUE PROCESS, THE FIRSTON:APRIL 6TH, 2017 (EXHIBIT)-PROBATION DERIVING FROM SAID DUI FALSE CONVICTION, AND AT SOME OTHER DATE AFTERWORDS  SAID SPECIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER  THE EXHIBIT OF THE APRIL 6TH FIRST PROBATION ORDER IS IN EVERY FACT AND DETAIL A LIE COVERING OVER THE TRUE FACTS OF THE APPELLANT’S TRIAL BY JURY IN ABSENTIA LOVETT PRESIDING AND DUI CONVICTION/ 2/23/17 IN SJCC RE”CAUSE NO. 2016 -215-. NOTABLE IN THE EXHIBIT IS THE OFFENSE DATE- DECEMEBR 24TH, 2015 CONTRASTED WITH THE ACTUAL DATE OF APRIL 4TH, 2016, AND THE TDPSFC LAB .231 BAC REPORT ENHANCING IST DUI TO A CLASS A MISDEANOR DATE OF APRIL 29TH, 2016 . RES IPSO, IGITUR,  THERE ARE TWO  CONTRADICTORY SPURIOUS PROBABTION ORDERS  DERIVING  FROM THE FIRST SPECIOUS UNLAWFUL APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER RUSE TO COVER OVER LOVETT’S TRACKS TO THE SCENE OF HIS AB INITIO CRIME, 2/23/ 17 SJCC.  BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, THE FIRST PROBATION ORDER APRIL 6TH, 2017,  A RUSE TO COVER OVER AND OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, LOVETT IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 CHANGED THE DUI OFFENSE DATE- AS WELL AS EVERY SINGLE FACT OF THE TRIAL AND PROCEEDINGS  2/23/17 -APRIL 4TH, 2016  DUI FALSE CONVICTION OF THE APPELLANT SJCC, RE:2016-215-  AND IN AN ANTI-CATHOLIC SLUR- ALTERED THE AB INITIO  APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI OFFENSE DATE IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 TO CHRISTMAS EVE, DECEMBER 24TH , 2015 CHANGED FROM THE INSTANTER AND TDPSHP DUI OFFENSE REPORTS (EXHIBIT ) SHOWN TO BE APRIL 4, 2016 IN A LUDICROUS ATTEMPTED COVER OVER OF LOVETT’S  SJCC FALSE CONVICTION OF THE  APPELLANT BEFORE A JURY IN ABSENTIA 2/23/17 WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING.

 

ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 19,2017, THE EASTEX ADVOCATE , your eastex news.com REPORTED:

TIMESTAMP: CLERK SAYS JUDGE BROKE INTO HER OFFICE;LOVETT SAYS VISIT WAS PROPER.

DAWN WRIGHT, SJC DISTRICT CLERK, CONCERNED THAT THE DATE STAMP THAT INCLUDES HER SIGNATURE IS BEING USED (BY LOVETT) WITHOUT HER PERMISSION, IS NOW CALLING FOR AN INVESTIGATION.

ACCORDING TO WRIGHT, THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME LOVETT HAS HELPED HIMSELF TO HER STAMP, CITING ANOTHER INCIDENT ON JUNE 23.

“AS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL , I AM VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN HAPPENING AROUND HERE,” SAID WRIGHT.

WRIGHT IS TAKING PRECAUTIONS NOW TO PROTECT HER OFFICE. THE LOCKS HAVE BEEN CHANGED AND THE COUNTY JUDGE  NO LONGER HAS A WORKING KEY. LOVETT DOES NOT EXPECT ANY CHARGES TO COME AGAINST HIM IN THE MATTER.

 

RES IPSO, iGITUR, EXHIBIT EVIDENCE INDICATES  CULPABILITY  IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 OF LOVETT  IN ALTERING  THE APRIL 4TH, 2016 INSTANTER DATE OF DUI OFFENSE RE:2016-215-BY THE ,  DECEMBER 24TH  2015 DUI OFFENSE DATE , FALLACIOUS IN ALL FACTS APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL,  TO AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE SPEECH SLUR TO DATE OF DUI OFFENSE CHRISTMAS EVE, DECEMBER 24TH, 2015, AS LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES ATTEMPT TO COVER OVER THEIR  TRACKS  TO 2/23/17 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC  HATE CRIME BY FALSE  DUI CONVICTION OF THE APPELLANT IN THE FRAUDULENT CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

RES IPSO, iGITUR, LOVETT COMMITTED FELONIOUS TORTS AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY OF THE SAN JACINTO COUNTY DISTRCT  CLERK’S OFFICE BY STEALING UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THE DISTRICT COURT CLERK’S TIME STAMP TO ALTER AND MANIPULATE DATES OF SJC COURT RECORDS.  WHETHER LOVETT USED, OR DID NOT BOTHER TO USE THE SJC CLERK TIME STAMP IS THE SAME IN REGARD, THE CRIMINAL EFFECT AND INTENT IS THE SAME, TO  LOVETT’S  CRIMINAL HISTORY OF VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 IN ALTERING DUI  OFFENSE DATES REGARDING 2016-215- TO DECEMBER 24TH, 2015, AND  BE IT ON THE RE: SJCC 2016 -215- TEXAS STATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, UNDERSIGNED BY ASS. DA. CHRISTINA WOOD IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTING AND FALSELY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT PURSUANT OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME, ON 2/23/17 SJCC, OR THE SAID SAME RUSE COVER OVER DATE ON THE APRIL 6TH, 2016 PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT WHICH IN ALL FACTS  IS FALLACIOUS, RES IPSO. IGITUR NULL AND VOID, NOT HAVING THE FORCE OF LAW AS A PROBATION ORDER..

 

TO CONTINUE…….

 

 

SAID SAME COURT, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT AND JAIL, FOR A SECOND TIME ON  MAY 14TH,   SAID SAME ACTING AS JUDGE, IN PROBABLE CAUSE COURT COURT,   AGAIN WITH VINCIBLE IGNORANCE AND WITH NO JURISPRUDENCE OUT OF HAND DISMISSED THE APPELLANT’S PLEAS TO BE EXONERATED OF THE MANIFESTLY ABSURD AND A LEGAL NON SEQUITOR OF THE TWO AB INITIO  MAY 13 CHARGES BROUGHT IN TANDEM AGAINST THE APPELLANT: NO.1)  DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID ( THE SUSPENSION OF LICENSE DERIVING SANCTIONED BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, DERIVING  FROM DUI CONVICTION IN SAID CAUSE NO: 2016 -215- 2/23/17 1ST DUI CONVICTION) ENHANCED BY: NO.2, VIOLATION OF SAID SPECIOUS,SPURIOUS AND ABSURD   DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION, A  RUSE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE  BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL IN APPELLANT’S CAUSE BY COVER UP..

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR,  SAID SAME ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO CULPABLE ACCESSORY  AFTER THE FACT WITH VINCIBLE IGNORANCE,  ORDERED EXCESSIVE BAIL OF $5000  THEREBY VIOLATED APPELLANT’S  VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AGAINST EXCESSIVE BAIL AND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT,  AND THEREBY UNLAWFULLY JAILED AN  INNOCENT MAN TWICE VIOLATING THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS  DERIVING FROM THE SAME 2/23/17  DUI FALSE CONVICTION IN VIOLATION OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION:, MARCH 13, 2017, AND AGAIN MAY 13TH, ILLEGALLY  ENFORCING OUT OF  VINCIBLE IGNORANCE SAID DELICT 2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT WARRANT MARCH 14TH AT LAW FIVE,, AND AGAIN THE SPECIOUS, SPURIOUS, AND ABSURD  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER AB INITIO  MAY 13, 2017,  BOTH  2016 DUI/ FAILURE TO APPEAR WARRANT AND SAID CONTRADICTORY IN FACT NON EXISTENT DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER  RUSE BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL,  NULL AND VOID AB INITIO DERIVING FROM  2/23/17 FALSE SJCC CONVICTION VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE FRAUDULENT CONTEXT OF THE TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

 

MOREOVER, MACK’S AND LOVETT’S  INVALID, DELICT WARRANTS STILL STAND IN SPITE OF SAID  NULL AND VOID MOCK MAY 19TH, 2017 MC COURT, AT LAW FIVE ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.. THE MAY 19TH  MCC AT LAW FIVE COURT ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE, TO THE CONTRARY OF THE SOUND, IN A JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON MAY 19TH, AT LAW FIVE, INDEED  DISMISSED ALL JUSTICE FOR THE APPELLANT AND THEREBY SAID MAY 19TH ORDER DOES IN  FACT  MAROON THE APPELLANT IN CONTINUOUS JEOPARDY OF HIS LIBERTY, HAPPINESS, AND LIVELIHOOD. RES IPSO, IGITUR SAID EFFECT OF MAY 19TH ORDER AS NULL AND VOID IS EVIDENT BY WARRANTS ISSUED BY BOTH COURTS: MCC AND SJCC  FOR THE APPELLANT’S  ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT FOR 365 DAYS WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION IN THE SJC JAIL AFTER TIME SERVED IN  MC JAIL OR VICE VERSA DEPENDING ON WHO FALSELY ARRESTS THE APPELLANT FIRST ON SAID WARRANTS AND PROBATION VIOLATIONS BY LOVETT, MACK, AND TDPS.  (EXHIBIT).

 

SAID  MAY 19THHEARING, A MOCK HEARING,   VIOLATED THE APPELLANT’S  VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, RES IPSO, IGITUR   AS MOCK AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL, NULL AND VOID, THE JUDGEMENT COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE, IS WITHOUT FORCE OR LAW.

 

RES IPSO IGITUR LEGALLY NULL AND VOID  RE CAUSE NO. 2016-215- SAID SPECIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER RUSE BY LOVETT IS , RES IPSO, IGITUR REGARDLESS OF THE MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE, NONETHELESS  ALL SAID WARRANTS  BY MACK AND CONTRADICTORY FALLACIOUS PROBATION ORDERS BY LOVETT ARE STANDING STAND  STILL AFTER MAY 19TH, “ON THE BOOKS” TO BE ENFORCED AGAINST THE APPELLANT AND  CONTINUES TO BE UNLAWFULLY  SERVED UNDER SJC CSCD TERESA MILNER DIRECTOR AND LOREINA KLEVINSKI IN CONTEMPT OF A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 04/29/2017 HOLDING JOHN LOVETT’S SJSCS ORDER APRIL 6TH 2017 TO BE NULL AND VOID.(EXHIBIT) MOREOVER BY SAID WARRANTS AND SANCTIONS LEVELED AGAINST THE APPELLANT RE: SJCC 2016-215- JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL ORDERED, AND JUDGE WAYNE MACK, MCC, PERSONA SOL ORDERED, AND TDPS UNLAWFULLY ORDERED IN PERPETRATION OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD IN TANDEM WITH THE 2003 TEXAS DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM  AND TDPS LICENSE REVOCATION PROGRAM.

 

 

FACTUAL BASIS OF GROUNDS FOR SAID APPEAL AND COURT ORDER OF MANDAMUS RE” SAID MAY 19TH MC COURT ORDER AND SAID ESTOPPEL CASES.

 

SAID MAY 19TH  MC LAW FIVE ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE IS NOT OFFICIALLY PROMULGATED AND THEREFORE DOES NOT HAVE THE FORCE OF LAW IS EVIDENCED BY SAID  WARRANTS AND SANCTIONS AND PROBATION ORDERS STILL STANDING  ORDERED BY SJC AND MC COURTS AGAINST THE APPELLANT AFTER MAY 19TH, 2017 MC COURT LAW FIVE ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE ONLY 1) OF THE 2) AB INITIO CHARGES LEVELED AGAINST THE APPELLANT.   THERE ARE, CONTRARY TO THE MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE  ONE CHARGE – DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID-  NEVERTHELESS- STANDING WARRANTS FOR THE APPELLANTS ARREST FOR VIOLATION OF FAILURE TO PAY OUTSTANDING CASE FINES FOR CONVICTION IN MC COURT MARCH 13TH , JUDGE MACK, JUSTICE ONE, FOR DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID AND FAILURE TO MAINTAIN FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, BOTH FALSE CHARGES,  PROBATION FEES AND FAILURE TO APPEAR AT PROBATION MEETINGS DERIVING FROM  SAID SPURIOUS CONTRADICTORY DEFERRED ADJUDICATION  PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL,  ALL SAID IN VIOLATION OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION ,  ALONG WITH, TDPS WARRANT FOR CONVICTION FOR DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID  AND FAILURE TO TDPS SURCHARGES AND CASE OUTSTANDING FINES (EXHIBIT) FOR CONVICTION OF DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID CONVICTION  AND NO INSURANCE ARE EVIDENCE  SAID HEARING  AT LAW FIVE, MAY 19TH, 2017 WAS MOCK, AND SAID ORDER BY DAMICO TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE CASE NO. 17-322548 IS DISAVOWED UNKNOWINGLY AS   NULL AND VOID BY MACK, TDPS,  AND LOVETT PER CAUSAM  SAID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER IS MOCK AND NOT ENTERED INTO THE COURT RECORD,  AS SUCH,  NOT IN A COURT OF LAW PUBLICLY PROMULGATED,  RES IPSO, IGITUR THE MAY 19TH COURT ORDER DOES NOT HAVE THE FORCE OF LAW TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE EITHER NO.1 DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID, OR NO.2 THE ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION. MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE BEYOND BEING DELICT IN SUPPRESSING UNCONSTITUTIONALLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE I.E.,   NO.2, DID NOT PROMULGATE NO. 1 PUBLICLY IN COURT RECORD IN VIOLATION OF THE DEFENDANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS EXPOSING THE APPELLANT TO CONTINUING DOUBLE JEOPARDY.

 

IN SAID MAY 19TH MOCK MOTION TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE    ASS. DA.  UNCONSTITUTIONALLY SUPPRESSED  THE  AB INITIO PER SE CONTRADICTORY ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED  ADJUDICATION PROBATION OUT OF A JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO COVER UP LIABILTY DUE TO  MANIFEST JUDICIAL MALFEASANCE AB INITIO MARCH 13TH, AND MAY 14TH .  SAID  NO. 2.SUPPRESSED BY SAID MOCK MAY 19TH MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE BY ASS. MC DA IS SOLELY A CYNICAL RUSE TO DENY THE APPELLANT JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN ALL SAID CAUSE,  AB INITIO  CHARGE NO.2  WAS NOT HEARD IN THE MC COURT AND ENTERED INTO THE MC PROCEEDINGS OFFICIAL RECORD ON MAY 19TH,  RES IPSO, IGITUR,  BY UNLAWFUL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL SUPPRESSION  OF SAID AB INITIO ENHANCING CHARGE  OUT OF SAID JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO COVER UP LIABILITY DUE TO MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT IS  NOT OFFICIALLY AND PUBLICLY PROMULGATED VIA SAID COURT RECORD AND THEREFORE DOES NOT HAVE THE FORCE OF LAWFUL COURT ORDER.  SAID WARRANTS ISSUED AFTER MAY 19TH MOCK COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE PROVE, NONETHELESS,  1) THE DRIVING WHILE LICENSE CHARGE CONTAINED IN SAID MOCK MAY 19TH COURT ORDER WAS ALSO NOT ENTERED INTO COURT RECORD, OR AT LEAST NOT PUBLICLY PROMULGATED, AND THEREFORE NULL AND VOID, HAVING NOT LEGAL EFFECT.

 

 

THESE GROUNDS, AMONG MANY OTHERS TO BE SHOWN, ARE FACTUAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS FOR THE COURT TO GRANT THE APPELLANT’S PETITION WRIT OF MANDAMUS IN SAID APPEAL.

 

 

THE MC ASS. DA ON MAY 19TH, LAW FIVE, IN  VIOLATION OF  DUE PROCESS DENIED THE APPELLANT’S VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS BY  UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSING IN SAID MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE THE AB INITIO May 13th  2) ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION VIA  DRIVING WITH AN INVALID LICENSE.  A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF JUDICIAL INTEREST EXISTED AS PRETEXT TO SAID UNLAWFUL SUPPRESSION OF SAID AB INITIO MAY 13TH ENHANCING CHARGE BY  MC ASS. DA.  SAID SUPPRESSION OF AB INITIO NO.2 IN SAID RUSE MOTION AND ORDER TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE FOR THE APPELLANT AND DENY EQUITABLE REDRESS IN HIS CAUSE. AT THE SAME TIME, SAID COVER UP RUSE, ALSO SERVED TO   COVERED  UP LOVETT’S CRIMINAL FRAUD AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION PERPETRATED AGAINST THE APPELLANT BY LOVETT VIA  A  PRIMA FACIE CONTRADICTORY  DEFERRED  ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER  WHICH  CAUSED THE APPELLANT TO BE FALSELY  ARRESTED,  AND JAILED UNDER EXCESSIVE BOND AB INITIO, MAY 13TH.BY MC COURT ORDER, AT LAW FIVE.   SAID UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSED  ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION NO.2,   NOT BROUGHT BY TEXAS STATE’S PROSECUTION IN  MC COURT  AS A PUBLIC CHARGE, COULD NOT BE  ENTERED INTO SAID COURT RECORD MAY 19, 2017 AND WAS RES IPSO, IGITUR  COVERED UP, NOT PUBLICLY  GIVEN A  PUBLIC HEARING IN A COURT OF LAW IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT. RES IPSO  IGITUR, LOVETT’S SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION ORDER STILL STANDS  AS WELL AS ALL WARRANTS AND PENALTIES DERIVING FROM SAID ESTOPPEL CASES LEVELED AGAINST THE APPELLANT UNJUSTLY. RES IPSO, IGITUR, LOVETT’S CRIMES WERE COVERED UP BY SAID MAY 19TH ORDER, FURTHER OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR , APPELLANT  PRAYS  SAID COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION FORTHWITH,

 

AS HIS LIBERTY AND LIVELIHOOD ARE PLACED BY SAID MAY 19TH MOCK COURT ORDER IN DANGER OF CONTINUOUS JEOPARDY,  IMMINENTLY  SUBJECT (EXHIBIT ) TO CONTINUED UNABATED BY  SAID MAY 19TH ORDER  UNLAWFUL ARREST AND FALSE JAILING BY LOVETT, MACK, AND TDPS PER CAUSAM SAID MC ASS. DA MOTION TO UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESS SAID AB INITO ENHANCING CHARGE NO.2  BY THE MC ASS. DA WITH OUT FOREKNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT OF THE APPELLANT AND VIOLATED, THEREBY, THE APPELLANT’S  VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO PUBLICLY BE ACCUSED OF ALL CHARGES  AND FACE HIS ACCUSERS (JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES RE”2016-215-) IN A FAIR, SPEEDY,  PUBLIC TRIAL WITH  IMPARTIAL, JURIS PRUDENT,  NON ANTI CATHOLIC BIGOTED  JUDGE OR JURY AS WOULD BE THE CASE WITH MACK OR LOVETT.

 

 

SAID COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION  IS PRAYED FORTH PER CAUSAM  SAID  STATE OF AFFAIRS  JEOPARDIZES CONTINUOUSLY , NOW  A THIRD TIME THE APPELLANT’S LIBERTY BY FALSE ARREST, MOCK HEARING AND TRIAL, AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT BY  MC AND SJC LAW ENFORCEMENT AND COURTS IN COLLUSION WITH TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.  SAID SAD STATE OF AFFAIRS FOR THE APPELLANT IS ENABLED WHEN FIRST SAID TWO LEGALLY OXY MORONIC CONTRADICTORY ABSURD IN TANDEM CHARGES- NO.1 DRIVING WHILE  LICENSE INVALID ENHANCED BY NO.2 VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION  WAS SUSTAINED AGAINST  APPELLANT’S LEGAL OBJECTIONS AND COGENT ARGUMENT BY ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO IN SO CALLED  P.C. COURT, SUNDAY, MAY 14,  AT LAW FIVE IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANTS VITH. VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.  NOT BEING AFFORDED DUE DILIGENCE IN FACT, NOR  OWED JURISPRUDENCE IN ADJUDICATION IN LAW  BY  SAID MCC AT  LAW FIVE  COURT, THE APPELLANT WAS FALSELY JAILED IN MCJ FOR A SECOND TIME AB INITIO MAY 13TH, THE FIRST TIME SAID MARCH 13TH, 2017,  IN VIOLATION OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION BY  SAID CONTRADICTORY  SPURIOUS  SECOND DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER  WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING BY JOHN LOVETT,  PERSONA SOL.  AT SAID P.C. COURT HEARING AND RULING JUNCTURE, SAID  MC COURT. ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO,  AND  MC JAIL , MC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT CAN NOT IN ANY CASE  PLEAD INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE  IN FALSELY JAILING THE APPELLANT, AN INNOCENT MAN THREE TIMES FOR THE SAME CONVICTION..

 

 

BY SAID MAY 14TH MC P.C.COURT RULING BY ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO APPELLANT’S VIII AMENDMENT RIGHTS AGAINST CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT AND EXCESSIVE BAIL ARE VIOLATED  AS ARE BY UNLAWFULLY JAILING THE APPELLANT BY EXCESSIVE BAIL THE  WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN MCJ UNTIL MAY 19TH, 2017,   ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO, CANNOT PLEAD INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE  OR BEING  NAIVELY  AND INNOCENTLY “DUPED” BY JOHN LOVETT’S MOCK CHICANERY RUSES TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE BY COVER UP,  IN ALL THREE HEARINGS AFFORDED THE APPELLANT BY THE MC COURT, AT LAW FIVE ENDING IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN SAID  APPELLANT’S CAUSE DERIVING FROM AN ESTOPPEL RE:SJCC 2016 -215-.

 

IN ALL THREE SAID HEARINGS, DAMICO REFUSED THE APPELLANT DUE DILIGENCE TO  LEGAL FACT,  IN SPITE OF APPELLANT’S OBJECTION AND BRIEF LEGAL ARGUMENT.  THE THIRD AND FINAL HEARING MAY 19TH, DAMICO DID NOT ALLOW THE APPELLANT EVER TO SPEAK IN HIS OWN DEFENSE OR PRESENT IN HAND SJCC PROBATION DOCUMENT EXONERATING THE APPELLANT OF ALL SAID CHARGES, A VIOLATION OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT. ALL THREE HEARINGS   DAMICO RULED  AGAINST THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE SUSTAINING UNDERHANDEDLY BY SAID  UNLAWFUL SUPPRESSION COVERING UP LOVETT’S MALICIOUS CRIMINALTY DUE TO DAMICO’S OWN  CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE TO FLEE LIABILITY SUIT PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION..

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, SAID SUPPRESSION OF AB INITIO NO 1. IN MAY 19THY MOTION TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE OF ENHANCING CHARGE FROM PROSECUTION MOTION TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE, MAY 19,  IS A RUSE TO  COVER UP DAMICO’S JUCICIAL MALFEASANCE IN NOT AFFORDING DUE DILIGENCE TO LEGAL FACT IN APPELLANT’S CAUSE NOR  RENDERING OWED JURISPRUDENCE BY LAW IN ADJUDICATING THE APPELLANT’S RIGHTFUL PLEAS FOR EXONERATION DURING ALL THREE MCC HEARINGS DAMICO ACTING AS JUDGE.   SAID MOTION TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE RUSE ATTEMPTS  TO COVER UP, I.E. OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, IN A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST, FOR MC COURT, LAW FIVE AND MC JAIL AND MC SHERIFF’S DEPUTIES FOR REASON OF CULPABILITY PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, SUPPRESSION OF EXONERATING EVIDENCE AND FALSE JAILING OF THE APPELLANT AND TO  DENY  THE APPELLANT JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR FALSE JAILING AND ALL HARM  DONE DUE TO THE MC COURT AND MC SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT NOT GIVING DUE DILIGENCE TO FACT AND DISMISSAL OF JURIS PRUDENCE AB INITIO IN UNLAWFULLY ENFORCING LOVETT’S SAID DELICT AND SPURIOUS WARRANT AND CONTRADICTORY PROBATION ORDERS  AGAINST THE APPELLANT.

 

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, PURSUANT OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS THE APPELLANT PRAYS IN SAID CASE, SUMMARY JUDGEMENT BY THE COURT AND HONORABLE JUDGE WITH JUDICIAL STANDING  IN SAID APPEAL OF Re: 17-322548, MAY19, 2017, PURSUANT OF EQUITABLE REDRESS AND  PURSUANT OF JUSTICE  BY GRANTING THE APPELLANT’S  AB INITIO MOTION MAY 19TH, THAT SAME AB INITIO MOTION THE APPELLANT WAS FORBIDDEN BY THE COURT AND JUDGE AT LAW FIVE,  TO MAKE MOTION AT HEARING AND TO EVER SPEAK A WORD IN HIS DEFENSE,  OR PRESENT IN HAND SJCC PROBATION DOCUMENTS EXONERATING THE APPELLANT OF ALL CHARGES, IN SAID COURT BY SAID ACTING AS JUDGE, IN VIOLATION OF HIS  ITH AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.  THE APPELLANT IN APPEAL PRAYS THE HONORABLE JUDGE BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS IN SUMMARY JUDGEMENT TO GRANT THE APPELLANT’S  AB INITIO MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL CHARGES, CONVICTIONS, SENTENCES,  SANCTIONS, FINES, PROBATION  AND EXPUNGE CRIMINAL RECORD PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN SAID CAUSE AND SAID ESTOPPEL DERIVING FROM SJCC RE:2016 -215-  2/23/17  1ST DUI CAM +.15  JOHN LOVETT PERSONA SOL UNLAWFULLY ORDERED

 

 

APPELLANT PRO SE PRAYS THE COURT TO ISSUE ARREST WARRANTS FOR SAID  ALLEGED FELONS LISTED AT 7) ABSTARCT  IN THE APPELLANT’S APPEAL FOR VIOLATION OF SAID APPELLANT’S CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION PURSUANT OF APPELLANT’S FALSE ARRESTS, BASED ON FALSE DUI CONVICTION-FEB. 23, 2017 – SJCC ACTING AS JUDGE WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING JOHN LOVETT AND SJCC ACCOMPLICES, SJC DEPUTY SHERIFF, AND TDPSHPO ACCOMPLICES SWEARING  TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT IN A COURT OF LAW , MANDATING THEREBY FALSE IMPRISONMENTS IN MC JAIL, AND SJC JAIL, ILLICIT IN AB SENTIA SENTENCING BY LOVETT PERSONA SOL OF THE APPELLANT TO 365 DAYS IN SJC JAIL FOR 1ST DUI CAM, TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT,  AND PROBATION AND COURT FINES LEVELED AND ARREST WARRANTS STILL ACTIVE BROUGHT ABOUT BY LOVETT’S AND ACCOMPLICES’ COMMISSION OF AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME AGAINST THE APPELLANT.

 

 

RES IPSO IGITUR, SAID APPELLANT PRO SE IN CASE NO. 17-322548 MAKES CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SAID SPURIOUS MALEFACTORS AND PRAYS SAID HONORABLE JUDGE TO ISSUE SAID COURT  ORDER OF PROTECTION   IN  EQUITABLE REDRESS TO BAN HENCEFORTH  ISSUE AND ENFORCEMENT  OF  ALL AND ANY  INVALID WARRANTS BY LOVETT AND MACK, BOTH AB INITIO ACTING AS PERSONA SOL WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING  IN THE APPELLANT’S  SAID CASES,   FOR APPELLANT’S  IMMEDIATE ARREST AND EXPEDITION TO THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL  TO BE JAILED INDEFINITELY WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF BAIL, OR  TO SAN JACINTO COUNTY JAIL TO BE JAILED FOR 365 DAYS WITH NO POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION, UNLAWFULLY  WARRANTED BY STANDING ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT,  AND MACK, PERSONA SOL .

 

RES  IPSO IGITUR,  PURSUANT OF EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR THE APPELLANT SIC  NOT TO BE SUBJECT TO FURTHER  GRAVE PHYSICAL, PROFESSIONAL, PERSONAL FINANCIAL HARM DUE TO MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES DERIVING FROM CAUSE NO. 2016-215-SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT AN ESTOPPEL, 2/23 2017, 1ST DUI FALSE CONVICTION UNLAWFULLY TRIED IN ABSENTIA  SEC. 49.04(C) PC, CJS# 54040014 – CLASS A MISDEMEANOR BAC + 1.5 AND THE APPELLANT  SENTENCED UNLAWFULLY  APRIL 6TH IN ABSENTIA WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/ DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING IN THE SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT, COLD SPRINGS, TEXAS SJC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT PRESIDING AS PERSONA SOL

 

RES  IPSO, IGITUR APPELLANT PRO SE MAKES CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND PRAYS SAID HONORABLE JUDGE MAKE EQUITABLE  REDRESS PER CAUSAM  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND THEREBY  ISSUE WARRANTS FOR THE ARRESTS OF SAID ALLEGED FELONS WITH PROBABLE CAUSE HERE GIVEN, JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES CHARGED WITH SAID FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE PURSUANT OF EQUITABLE REDRESS AND JUSTICE.

 

 

 

INFORMATION:

 

 

 

APPELLANT PRO SE FATHER CHRISTOPHER DANIEL TERRY, O.P.  APPEALS  AND PETITIONS  WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE HONORABLE KATHLEEN HAMILTON, MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF JUDGES, (AND..OR JUDGE OR JUDGES HAVING CONSTISTUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT STANDING TO GRANT SUMMARY JUDGEMENT ON APPEAL AND GRANT SAID PETITION OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS  IN CASE NO. 17-322548  AND  THE COURT TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL CHARGES, CONVICTIONS, SENTENCING, SANCTIONS, FINES  AND PROBATION AND EXPUNGE  CRIMINAL RECORD IN ALL SAID  CASES: NO. 17-322548 DERIVING FROM AN ESTOPPEL SJCC, 2/23/17 CONVICTION 1ST DUI +.15 CAM OFFENSE DATE APRIL 4, 2016, AND NO. 1CC18542 DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID-DL, 4/13/17  AGAIN PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, I.E. FALSE  IMPRISONMENT, MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE, IN VIOLATION UNDER COLOR OF LAW OF APPELLANT PRO SE, FATHER CHRISTOPHER DANIEL TERRY, ORDER OF PREACHERS, IST, IVTH VTH, VITH, VIIITH, XVIIITH, XXITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND THE APPELLANT DEMANDS A JUDGEMENT BY THE COURT IN  EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR TIME OF FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ALL HARM DONE IN ANY MANNER DRIVING FROM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT IN THE FRAUDULENT CONTEXT OF THE  TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

SAID TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD is proven  IN TANDEM AS THE CONTEXT OF JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF APPELLANT  BY SAID  EVITDENTIARY SJCC AND TDPS DOCUMENTATION  IPSO RES.IGITUR ,  SAID MALEFACTORS REVENUE FRAUD  BY THEIR MALICIOUS DUI PROSECUTION OF THE  APPELLANT AS ATTESTED TO BY  SAID DOCUMENT EVIDENCE IN EXHIBIT   involved five separate elements: (1) a false statement of a material fact:  TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT,  (2) knowledge on the part of the defendant that the statement is untrue, (3) intent on the part of the defendant to deceive the alleged victim, (4) justifiable reliance by the alleged victim on the statement-MPM 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY, and (5) injury to the alleged victim as a result

 

 

 

IN THE NAME OF WE THE PEOPLE AND BY AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND GOD GIVEN RIGHT AS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN

 

 

 

COMES NOW THE UNDERSIGNED APPELLANT PRO SE, FATHER CHRISTOPHER DANIEL TERRY, O.P. DOES PRESENT UNTO MOUNTGOMERY COUNTY HONORABLE JUDGE KATHLLEN HAMILTON

 

THAT ON MAY 14TH AT SO-CALLED PROBABLE CAUSE COURT, AND THE 19TH OF MAY, 2017 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW 5, PAUL DAMICO ACTING AS JUDGE ARRAIGNMENT HEARING RE CASE NO.17-322548

 

SAID APPELLANT, THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE IS DENIED HIS IST AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY  IMPARTIAL NOT RELIGIOUSLY BIGOTED AND  ANTI CATHOLIC JUDGE AND JURY IN  SAID COURT BY ACTING JUDGE NOT ALLOWING SAID APPELLANT PRO SE, THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE IN SAID CAUSE,  IN SAID COURT OF LAW  ARRAIGNMENT HEARING ON MAY 19TH  EVER TO SPEAK A WORD IN HIS DEFENSE AND MAKE AB INITIO MOTION, OR PRESENT IN HAND SJCC PROBATION DOCUMENTS TO THE JUDGE AS EVIDENCE EXONORATING HIM OF ALL AB INITIO MAY 13TH CHARGES. THE APPELLANT AT SAID MAY 19TH HEARING WAS DENIED TO HAVE A FAIR AND PUBLIC HEARING OF ALL CHARGES LEVELLED AB INITIO MAY 13TH AGAINST THE APPELLANT FALSELY AND LAWFULLY.

 

MOREOVER, WITHOUT THE DEFENDANT’S FOREKNOWLEDGE OR  RATIFICATION,  BEFORE OR AFTER ARRAIGNMENT HEARING MAY19TH, MONTGOMERY ASS. DISTRICT ATTORNEY MADE MOTION AT MAY  19TH ARRAIGNMENT HEARING TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE  OFFENSE CASE NO. 17-322548 E: DRIVING W/LIC INV. W/PREV CONV/SUS/W/O FIN RES 9CLASS B MISDEMEANOR . SAID MOTION TO DISMISS SAID CAUSE  BY ASS. DA WAS NOT EVER RATIFIED BY SAID DEFENDANT PRO SE THEN  IN SAID  COURT OF LAW BEFORE A JUDGE, BEFORE OR AFTER HEARING.  SAID APPELLANT IN APPEAL AND BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOES NOT RATIFY SAID MOTION TO DISMISS  IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE CASE NO. 17-322548 SHOWN TO BE MOCK AND A RUSE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE, BUT IN APPEAL BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS THE COURT  OVER TURN IT.. RES IPSO, IGITUR,  THE ONLY JUST AND ACCEPTABLE SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MOTION PURSUANT OF JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS TO BE RATIFIED BY THE  APPELLANT PRO SE IN APPEAL BY  WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS THE  AB INITIO  MOTION APPELLANT SOUGHT TO MAKE AT HEARING MAY 19TH,  BUT WAS DENIED  EVEN TO SPEAK  OF IN SAID HEARING  IN EXERCISE OF HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO SAY SO: THAT IS  MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT  TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE  ALL CHARGES, CONVICTIONS, SENTENCING, FINES AND PROBATION  PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  IN SAID CASE AND ALL SAID ESTOPPEL  OF  SAID MAY 19TH HEARING  ARRAIGNMENT  CASE.

 

 FACTUAL BASIS IN APPEAL OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND RIGHTEOUSNESS OF MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ET AL. PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

 

 

THE APPELLANT WAS FOR SAID MAY 19TH ARRAIGNMENT HEARING , FALSELY  ARRESTED  SATURDAY,  MAY 13, 2017 IN WILLIS BY M.C. DEP. SHERIFFS FOR DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID LICENSE AFTER BEING LAWFULLY STOPPED (BUT NOT TICKETED FOR AN EXPIRED REGISTRATION STICKER) A LICENSE SUSPENSION  UNLAWFULLY THE APPELLENT IN APPEAL VOLO CONTEDERE DERIVING FROM  FALSE CONVICTION 2/23/17 DUI +.15 CAM IN SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT,  JUDGE JOHN LOVETT PRESIDING, PERSONA SOL.

 

 

AT PROCESSING IN MCJ, APPELLANT WAS UNLAWFULLY ALIENATED FROM EXONERATING  SJCCOURT PROBATION DOCUMENT EVIDENCE OF SAID  AB INITO MAY 13TH CHARGES THE APPELLANT HELD CLOSELY IN HAND AT THE TIME OF HIS ARREST.  TELLING THE ARRESTING DEPUTIES AB INITIO THE NATURE OF THE DOCUMENTS, BY LAW THE MCSD DEPUTIES ALLOWED THE APPELLANT TO KEEP SAID EXONERATING COURT DOCUMENTS IN HAND.   BUT AT PROCESSING  AT MC JAIL, SAID SAME DEPUTIES  OVERSAW THE UN LAWFUL ALIENATION  FROM IN HAND TO “PROPERTY” APART OF SAID EXONERATING COURT DOCUMENTS IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S   VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL, AND IN VIOLATION OF  IVTH AMENDMENT,  PROHIBITING  ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF PROPERTY UNDER COLOR OF LAW,  RES IPSO, IGITUR,  ON MAY 13TH, 2017 AT THE MC JAIL MC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT DEPUTIES CONFISCATED THE APPELLANT’S    IN HAND LEGAL SJCC DEFENSE DOCUMENTS  EXONERATING  THE APPELLANT OF ALL CHARGES TO BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDUCE PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION THEREBY.

 

WHEN APPELLANT OBJECTED TO THE UNLAWFUL CONFISCATION OF PREVIOUSLY IN HAND  SAID EXONERATING SJCC COURT  PROBATION DOCUMENTS NOT WITH STANDING A REASONABLE LAWFUL SEARCH DURING PROCESSING, THE ARRESTING DEPUTIES REPLIED THE APPELLANT’S  LEGAL DOCUMENTS WOULD BE RETURNED WITHIN A FEW  HOURS AT MOST AND  THE APPELLANT WILL BE RELEASED ON A P.R. BOND  FOR THE AB INITIO CHARGE OF DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID. BARRING ANY WARRANTS OR PROBATION VIOLATIONS.  THE APPELLANT WAS ASKED BY SAID DEPUTIES THEN IF HE WAS CURRENTLY UNDER PROBATION.  THE APPELLANT REPLIED HIS SJCC SJC JAIL TIME PROBATION WAS ABROGATED ALBEIT UNOFFICIALLY AND UNLAWFULLY BY  SJC SHERIFF’S DEPUTIES  IN THE SAME MANNER  OF THE MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE IN SUMMARY JUDGEMENT BY ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO,  UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSED FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND RECORD THE EXONERATING MAY 13TH AB INITIO  CONTRADICTORY ENHANCING CHARGE  OF VIOLATION  OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT PERSONA SOL IN CONTRADICTORY TANDEM WITH THE CHARGE OF THE APPELLANT  DRIVING WITH LICENSAE INVALID.

 

IN FACT, THE WEDNESDAY BEFORE THE APPELLANT’S SAID MAY 13TH ARREST , THE APPELLANT WAS RELEASED WITHOUT SJC COURT ORDER OR WRITTEN EXPLANATION FROM THE SJC JAIL BY SJC JAIL DEPUTIES AND TOLD SIMPLY “THE SJC JAIL HAS NO RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU” BY A  SJC JAILER.  THE APPELLANT CONCLUDED AT THE TIME OF HIS RELEASE AFTER ONLY  SERVING  25 DAYS OF AN  AB INITIO 365 DAY SENTENCE ORDERED UNLAWFULLY BY LOVETT PERSONA SOL DERIVING FROM A VOLO CONTENDERE “FALSE” 2/23/17 IST DUI CONVICTION ENHANCED TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR +.15 BAC TDPSFC LAB REPORT.  POSSIBLY SJC JAIL DEPUTIES  REFUSED TO FURTHER PARTICIPATE IN THE JAILING OF AN INNOCENT MAN, THE APPELLANT, OUT OF FEAR OF PERSONAL LIABILITY  IN  SUIT PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PERSECUTION TO BE BROUGHT BY THE APPELLANT. MOREOVER,  JUST AS THE  SPURIOUS MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE,  SJC JAIL DEPUTIES MADE NO OFFICIAL AND PUBLIC RECORD OF ABBROGATING LOVETT’S APRIL 6TH  SENTENCING AND A PRIMA FACIE LUDICROUS PROBATION .    ORDER IN FREEING THE APPELLANT AT THAT TIME FROM FALSE JAILING OR THEREBY MADE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TAGAINST JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, IN DEFENSE OF THE APPELLANT  FOR LOVETT’S MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELANT AND FALSE JAILING THEREBY OF THE APPELLANT IN MISUSE OF SJC JAIL,  LIKEWISE, SAID MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE SOLELY ONE OF THE TWO AB INITIO CHARGES LEVELLED MAY 13TH AGAINST THE APPELLANT, NO 1)  DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID,  AND NOT DISMISS IN THE SAME HEARING NO. 2)  SAID CONTRADICTORY ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION  PROBATION DID THEREBY BY MAY 19TH RUSE  UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESS AND HIDE BY SAID MAY 19TH RUSE DID OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE IN FREEING HIM FROM FALSE JAILING, AND TO THIS END ENHANCING AB INITIO CHARGE NO.2 BEING UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSED AND  HIDDEN  WAS VIA MAY 19TH RUSE IS NOT RAISED AT SAID HEARING AS A MATTER OF COURT RECORD AND PUBLIC HEARING AT LAW FIVE COURT MAY 19TH.,  ET ALIA IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. RES IPSO, IGITUR SAID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE DID NOT  PUBLICLY, OFFICALLY, NOR LEGALLY IN COURT HEARING OR BY COURT ORDER AT LAW FIVE ABROGATE  EITHER THE SPURIOUS APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT  BY DELICT WARRANT OF WHICH THE APPELLANT WAS FIRST ARRESTED AND FALSELY JAILED ON MARCH 13TH, 2017 BY MC COURT AT LAW FIVE, NOR  SAID SECOND A PRIMA FACIE CONTRADICTORY AND SPURIOUS  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT, I.E. NO. 2,  CONTRADICTING SAID FIRST APRIL 6TH  PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT AS A RUSE BY LOVETT TO COVER  UP SAID  APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER. ET ALIA, ALL SAID CONSTITUTES COLLUSION TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANTS CASE BORN OUT OF A MUTUAL CONFLICT OF JUDICIAL INTEREST BY ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO,  AND PERSONA SOL, JOHN LOVETT IN OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE BY FIRST WRONGFULLY ENFORCING AND THAN COVERING UP SAID APRIL 6TH   PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT PERSONA SOL, AB INITIO MARCH 13TH  AND THEN HIDING AND COVERING UP FROM PUBLIC EXPOSURE IN HEARING IN A COURT OF LAW, SAID SECOND A PRIMA FACIE CONTRADICTORY DEFERRED ADJUICATION PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT BY RUSE 19TH COURT ORDER TO FREE THE APPELLANT FROM MC JAIL.

 

IN THE SAME MANNER BORN OUT OF A JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO ESCAPE PERSONALLY ALL SUIT LIABILITY FOR JAILING AN INNOCENT MAN PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION,  THE MC COURT AND MCSD AT MCJ, IN FREEING THE APPELLANT FROM JAIL, JUST AS  THE SJC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT IN FREEING THE APPELLANT FROM SJC JAIL DID NOT CONFRONT IN PUBLIC HEARING AND ON COURT RECORD LOVETT AS PERSONA SOL  FOR HIS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT AND HOLD  LOVETT LEGALLY ACCOUNTABLE FOR LOVETT’S AS PERSONA SOL, CRIMINAL MISUSE OF THE SJC JAIL AND THE MCC JAIL ALIKE IN FELONIOUS UDICIAL MALFEASANCE VIA IMPERSONATING A SJCC JUDGE, AS PERSONA SOL IN REGARD  TO THE FALSE IMPRISONMENT OF THE APPELLANT.

RES IPSO, IGITUR, THE MAY 19TH RUSE COVER UP OF LOVETT’S TWO CONTRADICTORY PROBATION ORDERS IN ALL SAID INSTANCES WAS NEVER  FOR INTEREST OF JUSTICE, BUT BORN OUT OF COLLUSSION AFTER THE FACT IN A JUDICIAL CONFLCIT OF INTEREST TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELANT’S CASE MERELY TO FLEE PERSONAL LIABILITY AS ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT AVOIDING SUIT FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION WHILE VINCIBLE IGNORANT,

 

THE SJC AND MCC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT  JAIL DEPUTIES ALIKE ALONG WITH THE MC COURT AT LAW FIVE, ARE STILL REMISS VIA RUSE MAY19TH, ORDER IN FREEING THE APPELLANT FROM JAIL EVEN NOW IN OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, AND THERBY ARE  RENOUNCING THEIR SWORN DUTY TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT BY SAID MAY 19TH RUSE STILL. THEREBY THEY  DID NOT OFFICIALLY, PUBLICLY, AND LAWFULLY ABROGATE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE  THE APPELLANT’S CONTINUOUIS UNLAWFUL JAILING BY PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL AND  CHARGE AND ARREST LOVETT THERE BY.  SAID RUSE MAY 19TH ORDER DOES NOT UPHOLD THE LAW TO ANY DEGREE  AND DEFEND THE INNOCENT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE  IN NOT CHARGING AND ARRESTING LOVETT AND HIS ACCOMPLICES FOR MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTING THE APPELLANT IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF TDPS COMMISSIONER’S  DUI/POM  REVENUE FRAUD.

 

RES IPSO IGITUR, BOTH MC COURT LAW FIVE BY RUSE MAY 19TH COURT ORDER AND SJC  SHERIFF DEPARTMENT AUTHORITIES  ARE STILL REMAIN  REMISS IN THEIR SWORN DUTY TO DEFEND AND TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE , IN A CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO AVOID LIABILITY IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SUIT,  IN THE SAME MANNER TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE WHILE AT THE SAME MOMENT FREEING THE APPELLANT  FROM FALSE JAILING.

 

RES IPSO IGITUR, SAID BOTH, ET ALIUS,  IN COLLUSION CONTINUOUSLY SUBJECT VIA MAY 19TH RUSE,  THE APPELLANT TO DOUBLE JEOPARDY  BEING ARRESTED BY MC DEPUTIES ON MAY 13TH, 2017 FOR  AN UNLAWFUL SANCTION ORDERED BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL RE2016-215-SJCC-DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID  AND MARCH 13TH, 2017 AFTER THE FIRST ENFORCING AN UNLAWFUL SPURIOUS PROBATION ORDER APRIL 6TH, 2017 BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, COVERED UP BY MAY 19TH RUSE ENFORCING AB INITIO MAY 13TH, A SECOND SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT TO COVER OVER LOVETT’S CRIMES AGAINST THE APPELLANT BOTH CONTRADICTORY PROBATION ORDERS BY LOVETT  WERE NEVER LEGALLY RATIFIED BY THE APPELLANT AND DO NOT EXIST IN FACT IN ANY MANNER, ONLY “ON THE BOOKS” SO TO SPEAK.

 

 

 

 

 

TO CONTINUE..

 

AT PROCESSING AT MC JAIL, MAY 13TH,  REPORTING TO MC ARRESTING DEPUTIES THAT IN SAID MANNER SAID SJC PROBATION JAILING WAS ABROGATED THE WEDNESDAY BEFORE,  FALSELY CONFIDENT AT THAT INSTANCE THE APPELLANT WOULD BE RELEASED MOMENTARILY ON P.R. BAIL FOR THE CHARGE OF DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID AND HAVING SAID EXONERATING SJCC  DOCUMENTS RETURNED IN HAND, THEREBY, HAVING BEEN  ASKED BY DEPUTIES IF THE APPELLANT WAS CURRENTLY UNDER PROBATION,  SAID  DEPUTY THEN LEFT TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE APPELLANT’S  PROBATION STATUS  ONLY TO RETURN SHORTLY THERE AFTER AND TELL THE APPELLANT THE APPELLANT WOULD BE HELD IN CUSTODY  AT MCJ  ON THE ENHANCING CHARGE  OF VIOLATING A  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION  ORDERED BY SAID  SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT AIN BLATANT CONTRACTION OF SAID IST DUI CONVICTION  2/23/17, APRIL 4TH 2016, 2/23/17 SJCJ RE 2016 -215-.  THE APPELLANT COULD NOT BELIEVE HIS EARS.  THESE TWO CHARGES IN TANDEM ARE CLEARLY CONTRADICTORY AND A PRIMA FACIE LUDICROUS  LEGAL NON SEQUITOR AND LOGICAL OXYMORON.

 

 

BEFORE THE APPELLANT’S MAY 19TH  ARRAIGNMENT HEARING AND BEFOR MAY 14TH PROBABLE CAUSE COURT AT LAW FIVE, ON MAY 13TH THE DAY OF HIS ARREST, HAVING AT PROCESSING SAID EXONERATING SJCC LEGAL DOCUMENTS  ILLEGALLY SEARCHED AND SEIZED OUT OF HIS HANDS BY MCSD AT MC JAIL IN VIOLASTION OF THE APPELLANT’S IVTH, VTH, AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, THE APPELLANT THEREFORE WROTE  IN ALL TWO  INMATE GRIEVANCES  OBJECTING TO  UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIOLATION OF HIS Vth AND VIth AMENDMENT RIGHTS BECAUSE OF FALSE ARREST, ILLEGAL SEARCH AND BY SAID UNLAWFUL SEIZURE OF SAID SJCC DOCUMENTS , AND VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS  BECAUSE OF ALIENATION OF HIS LEGAL DEFENSE PAPERS BY UNLAWFUL AND UNWARRANTED CONFISCATION BY MC DEPUTIES AT PROCESSING.   IN VIOLATION OF  THE APPELLANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, SAID EXONERATING SJC COURT DOCUMENTS WERE NOT RETURNED TO THE APPELLANT IN MC JAIL CUSTODY   BEFORE  SO CALLED  PROBABLE CAUSE COURT  HEARING ON MAY 14TH,  SUNDAY 9:00 A,M, AT LAW 5, M.C.J.  LEAVING THE APPELLANT BEREFT OF SAID EXONERATING SJCC  DOCUMENTS TO  ENTER INTO EVIDENCE FOR HIS EXONERATION  IN HEARING BEFORE SAID ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO AT LAW FIVE IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANTS WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS..

 

MORE OVER, IN SPITE OF SAID GRIEVANCES BEING TIMELY AND MARKED URGENT FILED THE SJCC EXONERATING DOCUMENTS WERE NOT RETURNED UNTIL THREE DAYS  AFTER SAID P.C. HEARING BY  MC JAIL SHERIFF DEPUTIES VISIBLY INTIMIDATED THAT THE APPELLANT EXPRESSED VIOLATION OF  HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIA SAID TWO GRIEVANCES AS DEFENDANT PRO SE.

 

VIA  UNLAWFUL ALIENATION OF SAID SJCC  EXONERATION DOCUMENTS IN HAND TO BE PRESENTED AT HEARING IN A COURT OF LAW, AND THEREBY FALSELY JAILED WITHOUT VERIFIBALE PROBABLE CAUSE, UNDER COLOR OF LAW THE APPELLANT’S  VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHT  WAS THERBY VIOLATED BY EXCESSIVE BAIL ORDERED BY ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO AT SAID P.C. COURT HEARING.

 

FURTHERMORE, APPELLANT PRO SE IS ALSO ALSO DENIED AT THE SAME TIME  BY SAID ILLEGAL CONFISCATION  BY MCJ  DEPUTIES OF SAID EXONERATING  SJCC DOCUMENTS AT HAND, A SECOND TIME ON THE FEDERAL LEVEL,  THE APPELLANT ‘S  WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, IN BEING  DENIED ACCESS BY SAID ILLEGAL CONFISCATION AND FALSE JAILING AT MC JAIL  TO SAID  FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURT  SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXASCOURT DOCUMENTS TO COMPLETE AND TO FILE WITH THE CLERK FOR THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN TEXAS APPELLANT PRO SE’S  PRIEVIOUSLY ALMOST COMPLETED PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. & 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY, BY SAID WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS COURT DOCUMENTS  ALBEIT CONFISCATED ILLEGALLY AT THE SAMETIME  WITH ALL SAID SJCC EXONERATING DOCUMENTS.

 

THE DEFENDANT HAS THE WRIT TO APPEAL SAID THIS APPEAL AND PETITION OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR BY MC COURT AT LAW FIVE, AND BY MC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT STILL REMISS IN THEIR SWORN DUTY TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT, THE APPELLANT IS TILL PLACED IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY ON BOTH A FEDERAL AND STATE LEVEL VIOLATING HIS WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL SEIZURE OF SJCC AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CRIMINAL FEDERAL COURT EXONERATING DOCUMENTS. THIS INJUSTICE IS AGGRAVATED BY THE MAY 19TH RUSE AT LAW FIVE, NOT IN ANY MANNER RELIEVED.

 

THE APPELLANT, BEREFT OF EXONERATING L SJC COURT DOCUMENTS TO ENTER INTO EVIDENCE   AND UNLAWFULLY  JAILED AB INITIO MAY 13, 2017   THAN AS  DEFENDANT PRO SE MANACLED WAS FORCED TO APPEAR IN SO CALLED  PROBABLE CAUSE COURT, AT LAW FIVE,  SUNDAY, 9:00 A.M.  UNDER SAID ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO.  THIS WAS THE SECOND HEARING AND ODERING BEFORE ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO FOR THE SAME OFFENSE RE: 2016 -215- SJCC, VIOLATING THE  DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION, THE APPELLANT, THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE, APPEARED IN HEARING AT MC COURT, AT LAW FIVE BEFORE ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO, THE FIRST TIME BEING  GOOD FRIDAY, MARCH 14TH, THE SECOND, SUNDAY, MAY 14TH, 2017.

 

AT THE BEGINNING OF SAID PROBABLE CAUSE COURT, SUNDAY MAY 14, 2017 ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO MADE A STOCK PRE HEARING PROBABLE CAUSE RANT INTIMIDATING AND THREATENING DEFENDANTS, ALL PRO SE WITH NO LEGAL COUNSEL, NOT TO SPEAK A WORD IN THEIR DEFENSE OR THEY WILL BE SENT BACK TO JAIL EFFECTIVELY  CHILLING THERE BY  THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND VITH AMENDMENT AT HEARING.   WITH TREPIDATION THEN, SAID DEFENDANT PRO SE   “DARED” TO  BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT PURSUANT OF HIS WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, HIS VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT AFTER THE FACT DENIED HAVING EXONERATING SJCC DOCUMENTS ILLEGALLY CONFISCATED BY MCJ  DEPUTIES  AT PROCESSING THE DAY BEFORE.  THE DEFENDANT PRO SE  MADE ARGUMENT  THE  SAID AB INITIO TWO  CHARGES FOR HIS  FALSE ARREST ON MAY 13TH – AND FALSE JAILING  IN MCJ:  1) DRIVING WHILE  LICENSE INVALID , 2) ENHANCED AS A VIOLATION OF  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION AGREEMENT VIOLATION THEREBY, A PRIMA FACIE MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY  CHARGES  DERIVING FROM  A DUI CONVICTION RE: 2016 -215- 2/23/17  AND THEREBY THE TWO SAID CHARGES AB INITO ARE MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY AND  A NON SEQUITOR IN RESPECT TO ENHANCEMENT OF BAIL AND LAWFULNESS OF BOTH CHARGES BROUGHT IN TANDEM.  THE VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION BY DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID IS A NON SEQUITOR IN THAT BOTH THE SUSPENSION OF LICENSE AND THE SPURIOUS NON EXISTENT DEFERRED ADJUDICATION ORDER BY LOVETT BOTH DERIVED FROM 2/23/17  FALSE DUI CONVICTION SJCC RE:2016 -215-  RES IPSO, IGITUR LOGICALLY  PRECLUDES  A SUBSEQUENT DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT  AFTER SAID DUI CONVICTION AND SANCTIONS, LICENSE SUSPENSION THEREFORE .

 

 

RES IPSO IGITUR, THE DEFENDANT PRO SE PRESENTED A PRIMA FACIE SAID CONTRADICTION AS A LOGICAL ABSURDITY AND INTANDEM LEVEL SAID MUTUALLY CONTRADICTING CHARGES IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE  FOR THE STATE PROSECUTION TO SHOW PROBABLE CAUSE AND THEREBY TO BRING VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION AS  AN “ENHANCING” CHARGE IN TANDEM WITH DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID BOTH DERIVING FROM SAID CONVICTION  2/23/17 SJCC. A LEGAL ABSURDITY AND NON SEQUITOR,

 

THE APPELLANT MANACLED AND FALSELY IMPRISONED, BEREFT OF SJCC  EXONERATING DOCUMENTS OF APRIL 6TH SJCC DUI CONVICTION PROBATION ORDER IN CONTRADICITION TO SAID ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION ORDE , WAS  NEVER THE LESS UNLAFULLY CHARGED “WITH PROBABLE CAUSE” BY SAID COURT AND ACTING AS JUDGE AT LAW 5, FOR  DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID,  I,E. SUSPENSION OF LICENSE,  A PENALTY FOR SAID DUI CONVICTION AND IN THE SAME HEARING   SAID CHARGE ENHANCED FOR VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION  ORDER BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL IN CONTRADICITON OF THE APRIL 6TH DUI CONVICITON PROBATION ORDER.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, NO 2) ET ALIA IN A PRIMA FACIE CONTRADICITON ENTAILS THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT TRIED AND CONVICTED BY LOVETT OF 2016 DUI AB INITIO, NOR CONVICTED OF APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI RE:2016 -215-SJCC..

 

BEREFT OF EXONERATING SJCC LEGAL DOCUMENTS IN HAND AT SAID P.C. HEARING, NOT GIVEN BACK TO THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT, NEVERTHELESS,  THE APPELLANT ATTEMPTED IN A FEW CONCRETE SENTENCES  TO MAKE  MC COURT AT LAW FIVE  AND ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO AT SAID P.C. HEARING SEE REASON AND RIGHT IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE AND EXONERATE THE APPELLANT OF ALL SPURIOUS CHAREGS THEREBY.  AS SAID, SAID TWO CHARGES ARE MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY AND DO NOT ENHANCE EACH OTHER, BUT RATHER PARADOXICALLY EXONERATE THE DEFENDANT OF BOTH CHARGES.

 

ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO GAVE HEARING AT LAW FIVE, AND ASKED ONE NON SEQUITOR QUESTION IN RESPONSE OF THE DEFENDANT “I THOUGHT YOU SAID YOU WERE NEVER UNDER PROBATION.” TO WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESPONDED, I DID NOT SAY THAT.  THE DEFENDED HAD SAID HE WAS UNDER PROBATION FOR CONVICTION-SAID APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT FOR A CONVICTION -A COPY OF SAID APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER WAS AMONG THE SJCC DOCUMENTS  ILLEGALLY SEIZED FROM THE APPELLANT THE APPELLANT WOULD HAVE PRESENTED TO THE JUDGE AS EXONERATING EVIDENCE -OF COURSE NULLIFIES THE CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION. WITH DISDAINING TUNNEL VISION AND, DISMISSIVE OF  DUTIFUL DUE DILIGENCE TO FACTUAL BASIS ACTING AS JUDGE AND IN EARSHOT OF ASS. DA. PRESENTING  PROBABLE CAUSE RESPONSE, “THIS IS WEIRD, ” SOWING NO JURISPRUDENCE , ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO SUSTAINED THE MUTUALLY INVALIDATING IN TANDEM  SAID TWO CHARGES AS ENHANCING , NOT MUTUALLY EXONERATING THE APPELLANT,  AND SET BAIL AT $5,000,  ENHANCED PER CAUSAM  VIOLATION OF THE MANIFESTLY SPURIOUS  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION WHILE  DRIVING WITH  LICENSE INVALID.

 

RES IPSO\, IGITUR, SAID  UNLAWFUL EXCESSIVE BAIL SET AT $5,000 BY DAMICO ACTING AS JUDGE IS   A VIOLATION UNDER COLOR OF LAW OF DEFENDANT’S VIIIth AMENDMENT RIGHT AGAINST EXCESSIVE  BAIL. MOREOVER,  DEFENDANT PRO SE’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WAS VIOLATED  IN SAID  COURT’S FAILURE TO PROPERLY AND JUSTLY  ADJUDICATE THE ACTUAL EXISTENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE AT THE DEFENDANT’S HEARING VIA A DILIGENT AND REASONABLE CONSIDERATION OF THE APPELLANT’S OBJECTION IN HEARING SAID TWO CHARGES ARE  MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY AND EXCLUSIVE CHARGES AND DO NOT ENHANCE EACH OTHER AND WARRANT  EXCESSIVE L BAIL THEREBY  SET BY SAID  COURT ORDER, BY ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO, AND NOT REACHABLE BY THE DEFENDANT PRO SE DUE TO A VOW OF POVERTY, ALL PREMISED AFTER THE FACT ON SAID ACTING AS JUDGE VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT IN OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE VIA THE MCSD SEIZURE IN VIOLATION OF THE IVTH AND VITH AMENDMENT OF SAID SJCC EXONEDRATING APRIL 6TH, 2017 DUI CONVICTION PROBATION DOCUMENTS ON MAY 13TH, 2017 EXONERATING THE DEFENDANT OF ALL CHARGES.

 

 

 

BY SAID UNJUST COURT ORDER AND BY EXCESSIVE BAIL, DEFENDANT PRO SE, WAS FALSELY JAILED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE IN THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL UNTIL MAY 19TH FOR VIOLATING A SPECIOUS NON EXISTENT OXYMORONIC DEFERRED A PRIMA FACIE CONTRADICTORY ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY SAN JACINTO COUNTY JUDGE JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, BY ACTING AS MC JUDGE, AT LAW FIVE,  PAUL DAMICO UNTIL THE APPELLANT’S ARRAIGNMENT HEARING,  MAY 19TH, 2017.

 

 

 

LEGAL DEFENSE SJCC  DOCUMENTS WERE RETURNED IN RESPONSE TO TWO FILED GRIEVANCES JUST BEFORE FRIDAY MAY 19TH ARRAIGNMENT HEARING AT LAW 5,  ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO. THE RETURN OF SAID SJCC APRIL 6TH PROBATION DOCUMENT EXONERATING THE APPELLANT OF ALL CHARGES INTO THE HANDS OF THE JAILED APPELLANT AT MCJAIL BY MCSD DEPUTIES WAS TO NO AVAIL.  THE  APPELLANT WITH SAID EXONERATING SJCC APRIL 6TH, 2017 PROBATION DOCUMENTS IN HAND,  EXONERATING THE DEFENDANT PRO SE OF TWO  MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY AND THEREFORE INVALIDATING  CHARGES WAS DENIED AT SAID MC COURT ARRAIGNMENT AT LAW FIVE BY SAID DAMICO ACTING AS JUDGE TO PRESENT SAID JUDGE AT ANY TIME SAID DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE, MAKE AB INITO MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL SAID CHARGES AND ESTOPEL ET ALIA  PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION,   TO SPEAK  A WORD IN HIS DEFENSE AT ANY TIME, TO MAKE A PLEA,  ASK FOR A JURY TRIAL, ALL IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S  ITH AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

 

 

MOREOVER, IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, WITHOUT APPELLANT PRO SE’S KNOWLEDGE AND RATIFICATION , BEING  AGAINST DUE PROCESS, , ASS. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, M.C. MADE MOTION BEFORE  JUDGE DAMICO IN ARRAIGNMENT OF THE APPELLANT HEARING ON THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2017,  TO DISMISS  FOR JUSTICE NO. 17-322548 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, AND THE SAME HAVING BEEN CONSIDERED, IT IS, THEREFORE ORDERED ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT SAID ABOVE ENTITLED AND NUMBERED CAUSE BE AND THE SAME IS DISMISSED BY SAID JUDGE. (EXHIBIT )  A CYNICAL RUSE BY THE MC COURT IN  A CONFLICT OF JUDICIAL INTEREST  TO DENY THE APPELLANT HIS VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO PUBLICLY FACE ALL CHARGES AND ACCUSSERS IN A FAIR AND PUBLIC TRIAL, AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, I.E. SUPPRESSION OF EXONERATING EVIDENCE- SAID SJCC  APRIL 6TH PROBATION DOCUMENTS- AND FALSE JAILING BY MC COURT LAW 5, ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO WITH EXCESSIVE BAIL.

 

 

 RES IPSO, IGITUR  APPELLANT PRO SE IN SAID CASE NO. 17-322548 MAKES MOTION IN APPEAL VIA  WRIT OF MANDAMUS (TEXAS CODE) PRAYING JUDGE CATHY HAMILTON, MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF JUDGES, ET ALIUS. TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL CHARGES, CONVICTIONS, SENTENCES, PROBATION, AND EXPUNGE  CRIMINAL RECORD IN SAID CASE AND SAID TWO ESTOPPEL PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, I.E. FALSE JAILING VIA SUPPRESSED EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE DERIVING FROM THE FEBRUARY 23, 2017 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND FALSE CONVICTION SJCC ACTING AS PERSON SOL, JOHN LOVETT PRESIDING, IN GRAVITY ENHANCED IN   THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  OF SAID APPELLANT MALICIOUSLY PURSUANT OF UNLAWFUL IN ABSENTIA SENTENCING OF THE APPELLANT AND JAILING FOR 365 DAYS, TWICE THE LEGAL MAXIMUM IN THE SAN JACINTO COUNTY JAIL, BY UNLAWFUL COURT ORDER OF SJCJ JOHN LOVETT AND SJCC  ACCOMPLICES WITHOUT CONSTITUTION/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING, LOVETT COMMITTING ALL SAID FELONIES  AND MISDEMEANORS AS PERSONA SOL  IMPERSONATING UN LAWFULLY A SJCC JUDGE, ENHANCED AS A RELIGIOUS HATE CRIME VIOLATING SAID APPEALANT PRO SE’S IST, AMENDMENT RIGHT IN TANDEM WITH HIS IVTH, VTH, VI, VIII, XVIIITH, XXITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW MALICIOUSLY  MASQUERADING AS A SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGE IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE AB INITIO.

 

 

 

 FACTUAL BASIS FOR GROUNDS OF APPEAL VIA  WRIT OF MANDAMUS

 

 

BORN OF JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE IN ORDER TO ESCAPE PERSONAL LIABILITY SUIT FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT, IS RES IPSO, IGITUR APRIORI  GROUNDS FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF DAMICO ACTING FURTHER AS JUDGE IN SAID MAY 19TH HEARING , THE  MC ASS. DA’S RUSE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE,  UNSOLICITED OR RATIFIED  BY THE APPELLANT, ONLY 1) DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID ,  AND HIDING FROM PUBLIC HEARING 2) ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION, THERE BY UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE BOTH NO 1 AND NO. 2 MUTUALLY EXONERATING THE APPELLANT BY SUPPRESSING AND HIDING  BY SAID RUSE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF  JUSTICE  THE AB INITIO,  MAY 13TH, 2017 ENHANCING CHARGE – VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION – THE MAY 19TH MOTION TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE  STATED SOLELY THE  MAY 13TH AB INITIO CHARGE OF DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID.

SAID LUDICROUS RUSE BY THE MC ASS. DA. BEGS THE QUESTION, WHY NOT FOR JUSTICE DISMISS BOTH AB INITIO MAY 13TH, CHARGES IN PUBLIC HEARING? SAID UNLAWFUL SUPPRESSION OF EXONERATING EVIDENCE OF  AB INITIO ENHANCING CHARGE- VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION- HIDDEN FROM EXPOSURE, THEREBY HIDING BOTH LOVETT’S AND DAMICO’S MUTUAL JUDICIAL MALFEASANCE AND DE FACTO COLLUSION THEREBY IN TANDEM  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT. SAID RUSE MAY 19TH MOTION AND COURT ORDER AT LAW FIVE  IS A DE FACTO AND  A PERDURING COVER UP RUSE, TO HIDE SAID MALFEASANCE AND COLLUSION BY SAID LUDICROUS UNLAWFUL MOTION AND COURT ORDER PER CAUSAM UNLAWFUL JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY AN ACTING JUDGE PAUL DAMICO AND MC COURT LAW FIVE, IN, FOR AND BY THE MC COURT AT LAW FIVE, AND THE MCJ AND SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT.

 

SAID RUSE, MOTION AND COURT ORDER, ON MAY 19TH, 2017 WITH NO  DEFENSE OF INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE, IN FACT NOW SUSTAINS  LOVETT’S SPURIOUS CONTRADICTORY DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER, THROUGH SAID RUSE MOTION AND ORDER, ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO, MC COUNTY AND MC COURT AT LAW FIVE, MCJ AND MC S.D. BY SAID RUSE MOTION AND ORDER OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, AS ALL SAID BY SAID MAY 19TH RUSE IN FLIGHT FROM PERSONAL LEGAL LIABILITY SUIT AS CONSEQUENCE VIA JUDICIAL MALFEASANCE IN THE APPELLANT’S FALSE ARREST AND JAILING BY SAID MC COUNTY AND COURT LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES TWICE, MARCH 13TH, AND MAY 13 IN COLLUSION  WITH  LOVETT’S MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT, ALL SAID ENFORICING LOVETT’S PERSONA SOL INVALID EXTRADITION WARRANT MARCH 13TH, 2016/DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT, AND TO HIDE MALFESANCE IN THE APPELLANTS CAUSE IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR THE APPELLANT, THE MAY 19TH,  SAIDCOVER UP RUSE OF SAID 2016 DUI CONVICTION  LICENSE SUSPENSION IN CONTRADICTION OF  SPURIOUS ENHANCING CHARGE OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDERED AFTER APRIL 6TH  DUI CONVICTION PROBATION BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL.

 

ON MAY 19TH BY SAID RUSE, MCC, AT LAW FIVE JUSTICE FOR THE APPELLANT WAS NOT SERVED IN ANYWAY  IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE ALBEIT  A TEMPORARY RESPITE FROM BEING AGAIN BY STANDING WARRANT UNLAWFULLY JAILED FOR CONTINUED VIOLATION OF A POST APRIL 6TH , 2017 SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUCATION PROBATION ORDER BY JUDGE LOVETT, AND A DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID OUTSTANDING CASE WARRANT BY MACK. ALL SAID NOT PUBLICLY ADDRESSED IN COURT HEARING AND RECORD BY MAY 19TH RUSE. RES IPSO, IGITUR  SAID 19TH  MAY RUSE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE   AND SUBSEQUENT MOCK COURT ORDER DE FACTO OBSTRUCTED  JUSTICE THERE BY IN THE APPELLANT’S  CAUSE  AT ARRAIGNMENT HEARING MAY 19TH, 2017.  BY SAID UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND MALICIOUS SUPPRESSION FROM PUBLIC HEARING OF EXONERATING SJCC APRIL 6TH PROBATION DOCUMENT EVIDENCE IN TANDEM WITH THE RUSE OF THE HIDING OF A SPURIOUS POST APRIL 6TH , 2017 CONTRADICTORY , DEFFERED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER TO COVER LOVETT’S TRACKS FROM APRIL 6TH CONVICTION PROBATION ORDER,

 

IN VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, THEN WITHOUT THE APPELLANT’S SOLICITATION, FORE KNOWLEDGE AND  RATIFICATION OF SAID RUSE DELETION IN MOTION AND ORDER OF NO. 2 FROM PUBLIC HEARING AND RECORD ON MAY 19TH,. THE ASS. DA MADE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF  JUSTICE  SOLELY THE MAY 13TH  AB INITIO CHARGE DRIVING  WHILE LICENSE INVALID AND THEREBY AS HAS BEEN SHOWN. SAID MOTION RUSE DENIED APPELLANT DUE PROCESS. SAID MAY 19TH RUSE HAS AS A PRETEXT, THE MCSD AND MC COURT AT LAW FIVE ,  AS AFTER THE FACT ACCESSORY,  VIOLATED AT THE APPELLANT’S ARREST MARCH 13TH AND AGAIN MAY 13TH AB INITIO AT BOTH  P.C HEARINGS, THE APPELLANT’S  WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,  VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. AS SUCH,   SAID UNLAWFUL SUPPRESSION BY DELETION OF SAID AB INITIO ENHANCING CHARGE NO. 2  IN MAY 19TH RUSE, A RUSE PERPETRATED AGAINST THE APPELLANT  OUT OF AN UNLAWFUL JUDICIAL  CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY THE MC COURT TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE , DENIED  THE APPELLANT DUE PROCESS AND THEREBY OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND HARM INFLICTED ON THE APPELLANT TWICE BY SAID MC COURT, LAW FIVE AND SAID ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO,  ENFORCING WITHOUT DUE DILIGENCE OF FACT AND WHEN DISAVOWING  REASONABLE JURIS PRUDENCE PLACING THE APPELLANT IN CONTINUOUS DOUBLE JEOPARDY RE: SAID DELICT INVALID 2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT WARRANT , MARCH 13, 2017 AND BY MAY 19TH RUSE SUPPRESSION  OF EXONERATING EVIDENCE OF SPURIOUS DEFERRED PROBATION ADJUDICATION  ORDERED BY JOHN LOVETT, ISSUED WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING APRIL 6TH, 2017 AGAINST THE APPELLANT..

 

 

 

FACTUAL BASIS SAID 2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR EXTRADITION WARRANT AND DEFFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ARE INVALID DUE TO LACK OF CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING OF JOHN LOVETT AB INITIO.

 

 

 

SAID WARRANT FOR APPELLANT’S ARREST  AND EXTRADITION TO SJC JAIL WITH OUT BAIL,  WAS CITED BY THE ARRESTING  TDPS HP OFFICER , MARCH 13TH, 2017  WHEN ASKED FOR BY THE APPELLANT  AS  2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT- OR RATHER-“DID YOU MISS COURT”-  THE WARRANT DATE  2016 RE:  IST DUI +.15 CAM CAUSE NUMBER 2016-215- SJCC/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT.  BY SAID WARRANT THE APPELLANT WAS AB INITO  ARRESTED AND JAILED IN THE M.C.J ON HOLY THURSDAY, MARCH 13, WITHOUT BAIL TO BE EXTRADITED TO SJC WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF BAIL, TO SERVE 365 DAYS, (TWICE THE LEGAL MAXIMUM OF 180 Days FOR FIRST DUI)  DERIVES FROM TEXAS STATE INDICTMENT, CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, CAUSE NO. 2016-215- SIGNED BY CHRISTINA T. WOOD. ASS. CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SJC, TEXAS  IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 “THAT ON AND BEFORE THE 24TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015, AND BEFORE AND MAKING AND FILING OF THIS INFORMATION, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN JACINTO AND THE STATE OF TEXAS, ONE CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL TERRY, (IN A YEAR OF SJCC PROCEEDINGS THE APPELLANT SEVEN TIMES TOLD THE COURT HIS MIDDLE NAME WAS DANIEL TO NO AVAIL) HERE IN STYLED DEFENDANT, WAS DUI +.15 BAC “WITH A BOX OF WINE” IN HIS IMMEDIATE POSSESSION”.  SAID ARRESTING  MARCH 13TH WARRANT VOLO CONTENDERE ORDERED WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING BY LOVETT PERSONA SOL  REFERENCES DUI 2016  IN CONTRADICTION TO BOTH SAID TEXAS CRIMINAL COMPLAINT UNDERSIGNED BY ASS. DA WOODS AND SAID SENTENCING ILLEGALLY IN ABSENTIA IN CAUSE NO 2016-215 BY LOVETT DERIVING FROM FEB. 23RD 2017 FALSE DUI CONVICTION OF APPELLANT UNLAWFULLY  IN ABSENCIA STATES ON APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER SAID 1ST DUI OFFENSE DATE TO BE ON  DECEMEMBER 24TH, 2015.IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 BY JOHN LOVETT.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR THE 2/23/17 APRIL 4TH 2016 DUI VOLO CONTENDERE FALSE CONVICTION IN VIOLATION UNDER COLOR OF LAW OF The APPELLANT’S IVTH, VITH, VITH, VIIITH, XVIIITH AND XXITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS IS NULL AND VOID, AS WELL AS THE APRIL 6TH ILLEGAL IN ABSENTIA SENTENCING BY ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, OF THE INNOCENT APPELLANTT TO 365 DAYS IN SJC JAIL, TWICE THE LEGAL MAXIMUM OF 180 DAYS 1ST DUI,  SAID SAME APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER  LISTS THE IST DUI OFFENSE DATE AS DECEMBER 24, 2015, NOT IN FACT APRIL 4, 2016, THE ACTUAL DATE OF THE ALLEGED DUI OFFENSE ON SAID INVALID 2016 EXTRADITION WARRANT BY WHICH THE APPELLANT WAS JAILED FALSELY TWICE IN MCJ. MOREOVER, SAID  ORIGINAL INSTANTER AND TDPS OFFENSE REPORT# TK4KYLOUTI5U BY BILLY CORLEY STATE THE DATE OF OFFENSE AS APRIL 4TH, 2016, NOT DEC. 24TH, 2015. (EXHIBIT 5).

 

MOREOVER, PERJURING HIMSELF IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001, AND IN FALSELY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT UNDER OATH AS STATE WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION IN SJCC ON 2/23/17 TDPSHPO BILLY CORLEY JUNIOR ON SAID DUI INSTANTER AND OFFENSE REPORT # TK4KYLOUTI5U RECORDED A CONTRIVED SPURIOUS DUI OFFENSE SITE OF ARREST AND SEARCH: MP 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY TO FEIGN CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND JURIDICAL STANDING FOR SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT, THE APPELLANT’S FALSE ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE ON ARIL 4TH, 2016 WAS IN LIBERTY COUNTY, NOT SAN JACINTO COUNTY.  CORLEY’S FEIGNING CRIMINAL DUI JURISDICTION FOR JOHN LOVETT AND SJCC  BY NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE IN SAN JUCINTO COUNTY RUSE IS A TYPICAL AND COMMON DECEPTION ENSNARING TACTIC  IN SJC IN TANDEM  WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  IN ORDER FOR REVENUE STARVED COUNTIES LIKE SJC, ONE OF THE POOREST COUNTIES IN TEXAS. TO DEFRAUD  ANYONE IN TEXAS VIA DUI FINES, JAILING COSTS, COURT COSTS, BAC TEST COSTS, PROBATION COSTS, AND TDPS SURCHARGES FOR LOSS OF LICENSE FOR BAC REFUSAL AND DUI CONVICTION VIA A STATE WIDE GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION REVENUE FRAUD OVERSEEN BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS.

 

IN 2016, DURING DISCOVERY DUE DILIGENCE, THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE IN CAUSE NO”2016 -215- INTERVIEWED   A TEX.DOT EMPLOYEE, ADAM ADAMS, AT THE LIBERTY COUNTY SCENE OF APPELLANT’S FALSE ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE TRIGGERING BY SAID TDPSHPO INSTANTER # TK4KYLOUTI5U ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF THE APPELLANT’S  BLOOD WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE AND AGAINST THE APPELLANT’S WRITTEN REFUSAL(WHICH TRIGGERED  THE INITIAL UNLAWFUL SEIZING  OF APPELLANT’S CM AND CDL DRIVERS LICENSE  FOR 180 AND 365 DAYS RESPECTIVELY- THIS ILLEGAL CONFISCATION OF SAID LICENSES WAS CONTESTED AS AN ESTOPPEL OF CAUSE NO 2016-215 SJCC AT TRIAL IN THE COURT OF JUDGE MACK ON MAY 13TH, 2017.  MACK DISMISSED OUT OF HAND WITHOUT DUE DILIGENCE APPELLANT’S AB INITIO MOTION  BE FORE TRIAL TO DISMISS THE CHARGE-DRIVING WITHOUT A VALID LICENSE (SUSPENDED) PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DENYING WITH OUT DUE DILIGENCE AND DISMISSING OUT OF HAND  SAID SJCC CAUSE HEARING STANDING AS AN ESTOPPEL.  MOREOVER APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO A FAIR TRIAL BY THE MC ASS. DA’S AT PC JUDGE MACK, JUSTICE ONE COURT REFUSAL TO  BY LAW PRESENT FOURTEEN DAYS BEFORE THE  MARCH 13TH DEFENSE TRIAL TO THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE THE LIST OF THE STATE CASE’S WITNESSES FOR THE PROSECUTION-VIOLATING THE DEFENDANT’S DISCOVERY RIGHTS TO VET THE STATE’S PROSECUTION WITNESSES AGAINST THE APPELLANT

 

IN SPITE OF SAID MOCK MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE  SOLELY DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID DERIVING FROM SJCC 2016 -215- AND REFERENCING SAID MC COURT, JUSTICE ONE, PC MACK MARCH 13TH VOLO CONTENDERE FALSE CONVICTION FOR DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID, THE APPELLANT AFTER MAY 19TH RECEIVED NOTICE OF CASE OUTSTANDING WARRANT FOR HIS ARREST FROM SAID WAYNE MACK, PERSONA SOL, LIKE LOVETT IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.

 

TO CONTINUE

 

IN DISCOVERY, THE APPELLANT DROVE TO THE SITE OF HIS FALSE ARREST ON APRIL 4TH, 2016  ON THE N I-59  JUST SOUTH OF CLEVELAND TEXAS IN LIBERTY COUNTY, NOT SAN JACINTO COUNTY. THE APPELLANT NAIVELY SEARCHED FOR MP 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY AT THIS SITE.. IN A CHANCE ENCOUNTER, WITH ADAM ADAMS A TEX.DOT CONTRACT EMPLOYEE WORKING THERE TO TRANSITION THE I-59 TO I-69, TOLD THE APPELLANT THAT “INTRASTATES” LIKE I-59 DO NOT HAVE MILE POST MARKERS, ONLY “INTERSTATES” LIKE I-69 . IF THE I-59 DID HAVE MILE POST MARKERS, ADAMS CONTINUED, THE I-59 DOES NOT AS SUCH, MPM 450 I 59, STARTING AT LAREDO, THE MEXICAN BORDER, WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 90 MILES NORTH OF SAN JACINTO COUNTY.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, NO CONSTITUTIONAL/ STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING DERIVES FROM SAID  NON EXISTENT SPURIOUS FRAUDULENT DUI OFFENSE SITE MP 450 I-59  IN SJC IN CAUSE 2016-215- FOR JOHN LOVETT AS SJC JUDGE AB INITIO, OR IN AN ESTOPPEL CASE  AB INITIO FOR THE SAME REASON,  NO JUDICIAL STANDING IS ADMITTED FOR JUDGE MACK IN AN ESTOPPEL CASE DRIVING WITH AN INVALID LICENSE CHARGE DERIVED FROM THE UNLAWFUL CONFISCATION OF APPELLANTS DRIVER’S LICENSE  TRIGGERED BY BAC  DIC 24 REFUSAL APRIL 4TH, 2016.VIA THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL 2003 TDPS GOOD DRIVING PROGRAM.

 

 

SAID BAC BLOOD SAMPLE REFUSAL BY THE APPELLANY IS LAWFUL ACCORDING TO BAC TEXAS LAW AND THE US CONSTITUTIONAL. SAID BAC REFUSAL IS LAWFUL UNDER TEXAS LAW IF THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE OF ALCOHOL IMPAIRMENT ABOVE .08  IN APPELLANT’S CAUSE 2016-215- SJCC-  TDPSHPO  INSTANTER # TK4KYLOUTI5U TDPS DUI OFFENSE REPORT  BY BILLY CORLEY DOES NOT NOTE ANY SPECIFIC INDICATIVE BEHAVIORS OF A BAC .231- ALMOST THREE TIME THE LEGAL LIMIT- ATTRIBUTED BY TDPS OFFICER BILLY CORLEY JR., AND SWORN TO IN SJCC BY CORLEY TO CONVICT FALSELY THE APPELLANT OF DUI ENHANCED +.15 TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR .RES IPSO IGITUR, CORLEY  SWEARS  NO PROBABLE CAUSE OF BAC .231 IN TDPSHPO  DUI OFFENSE REPORT ATTRIBUTED TO THE APPELLANT ON APRIL 4TH, 2015, THEREFORE THE APPELLANT’S REFUSAL WAS LAWFUL ACCORDING TO TEXAS BAC REFUSAL LAW AND THE TDPS LICENSE SUSPENSION FOR SAID REFUSAL WAS  UNLAWFUL.

 

 

MOREOVER, NO CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING EITHER FOR LOVETT, OR JUDGE MACK, IS DERIVED FROM ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SPECIOUS OFFENSE DATE, CHRISTMASS EVE, DEC. 24TH, 2015. STATED AB INITIO ON SAID CRIMINAL INDICTMENT SIGN BY ASS DA CHRISTINA WOODS AND  ON LOVETT’S APRIL 6TH, 2017 SENTENCING AND PROBATION ORDER IN CONTRADICTION TO BILLY CORLEY’S INSTANTER AND DUI OFFENSE REPORT# TK4KYLOUTI5U THAT STATES APRIL 4TH, 2016 TO BE IN FACT THE TRUE DATE OF CONTRIVED DUI OFFENSE

 

 

 

MOREOVER NO EVIDENCE FROM A NONE EXISTENT SPECIOUS OFFENSE SITE ON A FALLACIOUS DATE – SUCH AS TDPSFC LAB REPORT BY TDPS FCL TECHNICIAN RACHEL AUBEL OF  BAC .231 ENHANCING 1ST DUI TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION COURT JUDGEMENT IS ADMISSIBLE IN A US COURT OF LAW. MOREOVER, SAID TDPSCF LAB MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE OF BAC .231 WAS NOT RETESTED BY APPELLANT’S REQUEST OF A SJCC ORDER DENIED BY JOHN LOVETT IN DISCOVERY COURT January 9th, 2017,  IN VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW   AND WAS THEN SWORN TO BY AUBEL IN SJCC IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION TO FALSELY  CONVICT THE APPELLANT IN ABSENTIA OF 1ST DUI  ON DECEMBER 24TH, 2015.+15 ENHANCED TO CAM ON 2/23/17 IN SJCC IN THE COMMISSION OF AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME AGAINST THE APPELLANT. AUBEL’S .231 BAC REPORT’S DATE, ISSUED APRIL 29TH, 2016 CONTRADICTS ANTI CATHOLIC SLUR DATE ON SAID CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER BY SJCC OF CHRISTMAS EVE, DECEMBER 24TH, 2015. .

 

 

 

FIRST ARRESTED BY THE TEXAS DPS HIGHWAY PATROL IN THE COURT OF JUDGE WAYNE MACK, AND JAILED IN  M.C.J. ON MARCH 13TH UNLAWFULLY ENFORCING  SAID DELICT DUI 2016 WARRANT BY ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, ON  MARCH 18TH THE APPELLANT WAS TRANSPORTED FROM MCJ TO SJC JAIL.  MANACLED AND THEN AT MC J PROCESSED.  APPELLANT AT ARRIVAL IN SJC JAIL WAS TOLD BY AN OFFICER OF THE SJC COURT SPECIFICALLY COMMISSIONED  BY LOVETT, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL TERRY IS  SENTENCED  TO 365 DAYS IN SJCJ (LOVETT PERSONA SOL IN VIOLATION OF TEXAS CODE SENTENCING LAW  SENTENCED IN ABSENTIA APPELLANT TO TWICE THE LEGAL MAXIMUM OF 180 DAYS FOR 1ST DUI) AND THAT APPELLANT IS TO SERVE 365 DAYS BEFORE RELEASE WITHOUT PROBATION.. THIS IS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT AS PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE IN THE JAILING OF AN INNOCENT MAN  VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION PURSUANT OF AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME BY JOHN LOVETT, A MEMBER OF A SUBVERSIVE  ANTI CATHOLIC SECRET SOCIETY, THE FREE MASONS, SWORN IN THEIR CONSTITUTIONS TO SEEK THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH AND CATHOLICS.  FREE MASONS IN SAN JACINTO AND LIBERTY COUNTY HAVE A HISTORICAL MEMBERSHIP AFFILIATION WITH FELLOW OUTLAWED MASONIC BROTHERHOOD OF THE  KLU KLUX KLAN, LIKEWISE DEDICATED TO THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH AND TERRORIZING OF CATHOLICS, MOST FERVENTLY  DURING  PROHIBITION.

 

 

SAID RUSE MAY 19TH MOTION AND COURT ORDER ONLY TO DISMISS  FOR JUSTICE DRIVING WITH AN INVALID LICENSE AND UNLAWFULLY DELETED AND THEREBY SUPPRESSED FROM THE COURT HEARING AND THEREBY  COURT RECORD THE AB INITIO ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION DOES IN FACT ALLOW IN EFFECT JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, AND  ACCOMPLICES WITH IMPUNITY TO VIOLATE AND TO CONTINUE TO VIOLATE IN ALL SAID CRIMINAL MANNER APPELLANT’S ALL SAID CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING AB INITIO PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECTUTION PURSUANT OF AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR  LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES, BY SAID MAY 19  MOCK ORDER OF DISMISSAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, ARE NOT ABROGATED  BY SAID MOCK ORDER  IN CONTINUOUS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSION’S  DUI/POM FRAUD PURSUANT OF SAID ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.  NOR  THEREBY, BY SAID RUSE MAY 19TH IS LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES HELD PUBLICALLY AND LEGALLY  ACCOUNTABLE AND INDICTABLE, NOR EVER ARRESTED FOR ALL SAID FEDERAL AND STATE FELONIES AND  MISDEMEANORS  BY SAID LAW FIVE MOCK COURT ORDER MAY 19TH, 2017.

 

RES IPSO IGITUR, THE MAY 19TH SAID RUSE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE PROVIDES THE APPELLANT  NO TANGIBLE RELIEF  AND IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE MAROONS THE APPELLANT LEGALLY  CONTINUOUSLY STILL TO BE  VICTIMIZED BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION- FALSE JAILING VIA MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE- AND NONETHELESS BY MOCK MAY 19TH  COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE  BY  MC COURT LAW FIVE AND ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO THE APPELLANT BE DENIED  ALL JUSTICE AND ALL CIVIL RIGHT  OF A CONSTITUTIONAL HEARING TO FACE  ACCUSERS, LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES,,  HEAR PUBLICLY ALL CHARGES, AND SEE AND PRESENT ALL EVIDENCE IN A PUBLIC HEARING,  BY SAME MAY 19TH MOCK ORDER, IN AN UNLAWFUL JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST, DENIED EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR CONTINUOUS  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY  SAME SAID MC COURT AND SAID MCSD AND MCJ AUTHORITIES.

 

MOREOVER, THE APPELLANT AS STANDING WARRANTS ISSUED AFTER THE MAY 19TH MOCK COURT ORDER SHOW (EXHIBIT) IS NEVERTHELESS SUBJECTED, IN SPITE OF SAID MAY 19TH MOCK CYNICAL RUSE COURT ORDER, CONTINUOUSLY TO INJURY AND TO THREAT OF  IMPRISONMENT BY LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES  VIA A MUTUAL SPURIOUS PROBATION ORDER COVER UP BY SAID MAY 19TH RUSE  GIVING NO EQUITABLE REDRESS  OR RELIEF THERE FROM TO THE APPELLANT BY SAID MAY 19TH  RUSE ORDER..

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, SAID MAY 19TH  MOCK COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE  IS A CYNICAL RUSE BY SAID MC COURT AT LAW 5, BORN OF UNLAWFUL JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A COURT OF LAW, SAID CONFLICT, FORTHWITH  ENGENDERING MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT BY SAID MC COURT  AND BY MAY 19TH RUSE IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE DOES  DENY APPELLANT EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR TIME OF FALSE IMPRISONMENT, AND DAMAGES DUE TO MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BOTH BY SAID MC COURT AND MCSD AUTHORITIES, AND JOHN LOVETT AND SJCC AND SJCSD ACCOMPLICES.

 

WARRANTS ISSUED FOR THE APPELLANT’S ARREST BY LOVETT AND MACK, TDPS  SHOW SAID MAY 19TH RUSE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND MOCK COURT ORDER IS NOT RECORDED IN THE COURT RECORD ON THE 19TH OF MAY AND/OR NOT  PUBLICLY PROMULGATED BY THE COURT AND RES IPSO, IGITUR (EXHIBIT) APPELLANT IS WITH NO JUST RELIEF FROM SAID MOCK ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND  RES IPSO IGITUR IN CONTINUOUS JEOPARDY OF FALSE ARREST AND FALSE JAILING AND FINES BY WARRANT OF JOHN LOVETT AND WAYNE MACK AND TDPS  IN VIOLATION OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION.

 

 FAILURE BY THE COURT IN SUMMARY JUDGEMENT TO GRANT APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT  TO DISMISS  WITHOUT PREJUDICE CHARGES ET AL. PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, JUST AS  GREGG ABBOTT BEING REMISS IN HIS SWORN DUTY TO UPHOLD THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION AS GOVERNOR  (EXHIBIT) AND TO CERTIFY APPELLANT’S RES IPSO FACTO DISQUALIFICATION MOTION OF LOVETT 2/23/17 AS JUDGE IN CAUSE 2016-215- ENABLES JOHN LOVETT AND HIS CO-CONSPIRATORS AND ACCOMPLICES TO CONTINUOUS PERPETRATE  TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM CAH COW MONEY MAKING FRAUD AND UNDER OF COLOR OF LAW  TO UNABATED HAVE THEIR PART IN DEFRAUDING OVER TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND INNOCENT PERSONS IN TEXAS A YEAR, IN TANDEM WITH UNLAWFULLY CONFISCATING  NON CDL DRIVER’S LICENCES VIA THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL  2003 TDPS (DPR) DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM BY LAW IS LIMITED TO CONFISCATING ONLY COMMERICIAL A/ CDL, NOT CLASS C/B/M DRIVER’S LICENSE.  AND YET ALMOST 96% OF LICENSES CONFISCATED AND SUSPENDED BY TDPS IN SAID GOVERNMENT/POLICE REVENUE FRAUDS IN VIOLATION OF THE TEXAS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ARE OTHER THAN PROFESSIONAL COMMERCIAL A/CDL LICENSES, SUSPENDED IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD OUTSIDE THE LAW OF THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL 2003 TDPS DRIVERS’ RESPONSIBILITY LAW RURAL AND COMMERICAL LEGAL ENFORCEMENT PERAMETERS.  PURSUANT OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY SURCHARGES EXTORTED FOR THE TEXAS STATE GOVERNMET VIA TDPS UNDER THREAT OF JAILING ( A VERITABLE DEBTORS PRISON) TO GET THE AB INITIO UNLAWFUL CONFISCATED SUSPENDED LICENSES BACK AFTER ILLEGAL SUSPENSION AB INITIO.  

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR,

 

THE APPELLANT MAKES SAID APPEAL PETITIONING  WRIT OF MANDAMUS REPRESENTING IN CLASS ACTION SUIT EVERYONE FREELY ENJOINING SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT IN TEXAS VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. FALSE JAILING AND MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED POTENTIALLY OXONERATING  BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE THERE BY  FALSELY CONVICTED OF DUI/POM  IN PERPETRATION OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

SAID APPEAL AND SAID WRIT IS A CLASS ACTION SUIT EX PARTE  EVERYONE  IN TEXAS VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION FALSELY CONVICTED OF DUI/POM  WITH MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EXONERATING BLOOD SAM0PLE  EVIDENCE, ET ALIA AND FALSELY JAILED AND PENALIZED IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE FIVE GOVERNOR APPOINTED TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF  PUBLIC SAFETY  COMMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

SAID MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED POTENTIALLY EXONERATING  PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE  IN THE APPELLANT’S APPEAL CONSTITUTE  PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID  CLASS ACTION SUIT  AS CLASS ACTION  PLAINTIFF AGAINST THE FIVE COMMISSIONERS OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY  AND EMPLOYEES AND ACCOMPLICES FOR PERPETRATION OF SAID DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD AGAINST PLAINTIFFS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.  .

 

SAID MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD CONSTITUTING PLAINTIFF STANDING IN CLASS ACTION SUIT ARE:

 

ALL TDPS FORENSIC CRIME LAB, HARRIS COUNTY AUTHORED BAC TEST REPORTS USED IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF VICITIMS OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IN TEXAS CONSTITUTE PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT. EVERY SAID TDPSFC LAB BAC TEST REPORT IS SCIENTIFICALLY SPURIOUS AND MALICIOUSLY MISLEADING AS FALLACIOUSLY SELF CERTIFIED BY TDPSFC LAB BAC TECHNICIAN OF SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORTS SAID  TO BE  “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL.”

 

THE TRUTH IS NO TDPSFC LAB BAC TECHNICIAN UNDERSIGNING AND THEREBY SWEARING  TO ANY TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORT AS LEGAL EVIDENCE FOR STATE DUI PROSECUTION CAN HAVE ANY VALID SELF CERTIFIED  RATHER THAN SCIENTIFICALLY BASED  BAC TEST RESULT CONFIDENCE LEVEL OF BAC TEST ACCURACY AT ANY LEVEL, MOREOVER “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” OF SAID BAC TEST RESULTS ACCURACY.  TDPSCF LAB SELF CERTIFIED AT  “%99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” BAC REPORTS  BY THE UNDERSIGNING AND THEREBY SWEARING AS LEGAL EVIDENCE TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST TECHNISIAN IS AN INTENTIONALLY DECEPTIVE WAY OF STATING  EVERY SAID TDPSCFL BAC TEST REPORT RESULT IS WHAT THE TDPSFC LAB REPORT SAY IT IS BECAUSE THE UNDERSIGNING BAC TECHNICIAN SAYS SO WITH A “99,7% CONFIDENCE LEVEL”. BASICALLY, THE BAC TEST RESULT LEVEL IS WHAT THE TDPSCF LAB REPORT SWEARS THE BAC IS,  BECAUSE THE UNDERSIGNER ALLEGED TDPSCF LAB BAC TECHNICIAN  THEREBY SWEARS IT. IS WITH A “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL”. AND THERE IS NO RETESTING OF TDPSFC LAB BAC REPORTS BY INDEPENDENT LAB IN VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW. THE BAC LEVEL IS WHAT IT IS BECAUSE I SWEAR IT IS IN MY REPORT TO BE LEGAL EVIDENCE FOR A COURT OF LAW WITH “99.7 %” CONFIDENCE  LEVEL.  THIS IS NOT A SCIENCE BASED BAC REPORT RESULT, THIS IS A FRAUD BASED REPORT SINE QUA NON IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD..  MOREOVER TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT UNDERSIGNERS HAVE  A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN SWEARING THE BAC TEST RESULTS AT A SPURIOUS %99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVELARE NEVER BELOW .O8 OR EVEN .15 BAC TO QUALIFY AS MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE FOR DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS. THE APPELLANT’S CASE RAISES A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT THE TDPS EVEN PREFORMS THE BAC TEST ON MAILED IN PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES IN THE FIRST PLACE.

 

SAID TDPSCF LAB REPORTS BAC LEVELS ARE WHAT THEY ARE SWORN TO BE WITH 99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL THEREFORE,  NOT BASED ON TDPSCF LAB FOLLOWING EXACTING BAC OPTIMAL TESTING PROCEDURES WITH WELL MAINTAINED TESTING DEVICES AT SPECIFIED CALIBRATION LEVELS THAT ACHIEVED A 99% ACCURRACY IN BAC TEST RESULT WITH A 100%  CONFIDENCE LEVEL IN THAT RESULT THROUGH RIGOROUS COMPARISON WITH OTHER BAC TESTING CONSTELLATIONS IN SAID SCIENTIFIC STUDY AND REPORT WHICH COULD ONLY ACHIEVE WITH OPTIMAL TESTING ELEMENTS AND CONDITIONS A 99% LEVEL OF ACCURACY BY RIGOROUS EXPERIMENTATION.

 

Chromatographic resolution and peak shape are vital in determining peak area for quantification of blood

alcohol determination. With minor alterations of few headspace parameters, the accuracy and precision

of the alcohol concentration can be drastically altered. Determining the optimal parameters are of utmost

importance to achieve the most robust and precise analysis. Therefore, it is recommended from these

data that the headspace oven temperature for this instrumentation be set to 85 °C, with a headspace vial

pressurization of 15 psi, for the best overall performance.

 

 

IN DISCOVERY IN 2016, JUST MONTHS AFTER SAID SCIENTIFC REPORT CLAIMED A 99% BAC ACCURACY LEVEL AT A %100 CONFIDENCE LEVEL UNDER OPTIMAL PROVEN TESTING CONDITIONS  WAS PUBLISHED ON  HOW LABS MAY ACHIEVE OPTIMAL BAC TEST ACCURANCY, THE TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY DID NOT RESPOND IN DISCOVERY TO THE APPELLANT’S REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION ABOUT THE NUMBER OF BAC. 231 TDPS RESULTS IN TEXAS, PARTICULARLY SJC OVER THE PAST FOUR MONTHS, NOR STANDARD TDPSCF LAB OPERATIONAL BAC TESTING PROCEDURE IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S DISCOVERY RIGHTS. TO SAY THE  TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORT RESULTS ARE SELF CERTIFED BY THE REPORT UNDERSIGNING  SWEARING THEM AS COURT EVIDENCE WITH 99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL IS A SCIENTIFICALLY MEANINGLESS DISTORTION.  IF THE ABOVE BAC TESTING PROTOCAL IS NOT FOLLOWED IN EVERY  BAC  TDPSFC LAB TESTING CASE, WHICH  WITHOUT A DOUBT IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE  SAID BAC TESTING PROTOCAL WAS NOT, With minor alterations of few headspace parameters, the accuracy and precision

of the alcohol concentration can be drastically altered .

 

 

TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY ALLEGEDLY A MONTH BACK LOGGED IS COMPLETELY ABSORBED DOING HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF  BAC TEST REPORTS FOR ALL OF TEXAS ( THERE IS A REASONABLE DOUBT RAISED BY THE APPELLANT’S CASE THAT THE TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST ON  PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES ARE ACTUALLY DONE IN EVERY DUI CASE IN TEXAS) THE AMOUNT OF BAC TESTING, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES A YEAR AT JUST ONE LAB, HARRIS COUNTY CAUSES SYSTEMIC ACCURACY DYSFUNCTION, THE LENGTHY PERIOD OF TIME BEFORE TESTING AND FILING ERRORS, (ALCOHOL FORMENTS IN BLOOD IF NOT FROZEN OR REFRIGERATED. IN DISCOVERY THE TDPSCF LAB DID NOT RESPOND TO ANY TDPSCF LAB PROCEDURE QUESTIONS. THE BLOOD SAMPLES ARE NOT IMMEDIATELY REFRIGERATED WHEN PUT INTO A MAIL BOX BY THE DUI INSTANTER ISSUING ARRESTING OFFICER AFTER THEIR PIRATING AND CAB BE SUBJECTED DURING SUMMER AND AUTUMN MONTHS IN TEXAS TO HIGH TEMPERATURES INCREASING FERMENTATION.  PLUS OR MINUS .O2 BAC DIFFERENTIAL IS  ALLOWABLE IN COURT). MOREOVER, THAT AMOUNT OF RELENTLESS TESTING REQUIRES CONSTANT DOWN TIME TO REPAIR AND MAINTAIN AND CALIBERATE THE TDPSCF LAB BAC TESTING MACHINCES TO MAINTAIN THE 99% BAC TEST RESULT ACCURACY LEVEL AT 100% CONFIDENCE IN EVERY DUI CASE IN TEXAS.

ALTHOUGH THE APPELLANT WAS DENIED IN DISCOVERY BY TDPSCF LAB ANY TDPSCF LAB BAC TESTING PROTOCOL AT THE HARRIS COUNTY LAB, THERE IS A REASONABLE DOUBT THEREBY THAT TDPSCF LAB FOLLOWED IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, OR IN ANY DUI CAASE IN  TEXAS SAID OPTIMAL BAC TESTING PROCEDURE- Determining the optimal parameters are of utmost

importance to achieve the most robust and precise analysis. Therefore, it is recommended from these

data that the headspace oven temperature for this instrumentation be set to 85 °C, with a headspace vial

pressurization of 15 psi, for the best overall performance.  THIS NOT BEING DONE IN EVERY CASE AT THE HARIS COUNTY LAB ENTAILS With minor alterations of few headspace parameters, the accuracy and precision

of the alcohol concentration can be drastically altered .  THE SPURIOUS SELF CERTIFYING AT “99.7% CONFIDENCE LEVEL”  TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST RESULTS REPORT NOT WITHSTANDING IN ANY SCIENTIFIC OR LEGALLY MEANINGFUL WAY.

 

.

MOREOVER, IN THE EXEMPLAR APPELLANT’S CASE, THE  MALICIOUSLY LUDICROUS AND ARBITRARY ATTRIBUTED WITH % 99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL BY TDPSFC LAB BAC TECHNICIAN RACHEL AUBEL TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLENT OF ENHANCED BY +.15 CAM DUI, SAID TDPSFC LAB

.231 BAC TDPSCF LAB REPORT-  WITH RESULTS AT %99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL, I.E. ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT OF .08, THE HIGHEST BAC DEGREE LISTED ON THE STANDARD BAC CHART – YET  RACHEL AUBEL’S SAID TDPSFC LAB BAC .231REPORT WITH %99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL ASSIGNED TO THE APPELLANT IN A TDPSFC BAC LAB REPORT ISSUED BY RACHEL AUBEL ON APRIL29TH, 2016 IN LINKING THE APPELLANT TO A DUI OFFENSE ON CHRISTMAS EVE, DECEMBER 24, 2015 UNDERSIGNED BY ASS DA. CHRISTINA WOOD IN HER CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST THE APPELLANT FOR SAID DUI, AND AGAIN ON JOHN LOVETT’S APRIL 6TH, 2017 PROBATION ORDER, SAID BAC .231 LEVEL, ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT, WAS NOT CORROBORATED BY BILLY CORLEY’S TDPSHPO DUI OFFENSE REPORT, APRIL 4, 2016 TO ANY SIGNIFICANT DEGREE. CORLEY SWORE TO THE .231 BAC AND DECEMBER 24, 2015 DATE AS STATE WITNESS TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT IN TANDEM WITH RACHEL ABEL IN CONTRACTION OF HIS APRIL 4, 2016 DUI TDPSHP OFFENSE REPORT,  THIS AND  SAID ABRITRARY ASSIGNED BAC .231 TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT UNDERSIGNED BY RACHEL AUBEL APRIL 29TH, 2016, AND SWORN TO UNDER OATH AGAIN BY AUBEL AND CORLEY TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT 2/23/17 OF AN ENHANCED THERE BY CLASS A MISDEMEANOR 1ST DUI OFFENSE, BEGS QUESTIONS AND  RAISES MANY REASONABLE DOUBTS ABOUT ALL TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICITMS PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES FROM TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS BEING FIRST AND FOREMEOST SUPPRESSED AS POTENTIALLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE OF DUI FOR ALMOST A MONTH IN ALL CASES BY TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY,  ARE DURING SAID TIME PERIOD EVER ACTUALLY TESTED IN THE FIRST PLACE AT TDPSFC LAB, HARRIS COUNTY, JUST AS NON LUCRATIVE UNTESTED RAPE KITS BACKED LOGGED SIX YEARS AT THE TDPSCF LAB HARRIS COUNTY ARE NOT TESTED DUE TO BACK LOG, AN OXYMORON. RAPE KITS ARE NOT TESTED BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT TESTED THEM ALL FOR SIX YEARS NOW.

 

 

 

 

DE FACTO,  IN TEXAS, NOT ONE TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT RESULTS ALLEGEDLY BASED ON SAID PIRATED TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICITMS’ BLOOD SAMPLES HAS EVER BEEN RETESTED FOR SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY  AGAIN BY TDPSFC LAB FOR REASONABLE DOUBT OF SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY IN THE INTEREST OF JUST AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE – OR  DE FACTO -EVEN IF RETESTED- SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT TEST RESULTS NEVER ARE I REMIND YOU- THE TDPSCF LAB BAC RETEST RESULTS FOR ALL SAID INEXORABLE MATRIX EFFECT BAC TESTING DEVICE MAINTENANCE AND CALIBRATION INEXORABLE SYSTEMIC DYSFUNCTION ARE NOT AND CANNOT BE WITH 99.7 %  CONFIDENCE LEVEL OF ACCURACY BE SCIENTIFICALLY RETESTED- RES IPSO, IGITUR IN VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW IN ALL DUI CASES IN TEXAS, THIS HAS BEEN PROVEN,

 

 

MOREOVER, NOT ONE SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORT HAS EVER RETURNED AFTER DUI INSTANTER JAILING IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FROM SAID TDPSCF LAB AT -_.08. TRIGGERING THEREBY A MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SUIT AGAINST THE TDPS AND AFTER THE FACT ACCESSORIES.

 

THE APPELLANT KNOWS OF ONLY A ONE, SINGLE PENDING EXCEPTION OF A -.08 AND MOST LIKELY BAC 00.00 BLOOD SAMPLE TDPSCF LAB TEST REPORT RETURNED AFTER A SUSPECTED DUI RELATED CAR CRASH.  JOHN LOVETT’S VOLUNTARY BAC TEST BLOOD SAMPLES ARE THAT ONE, SINGLE PENDING EXCEPTION TO AN UNBREAKABLE TDPSFC BAC TEST RESULTS LAB FRAUD OF MANUFACTURE EVIDENCE REPORTS THAT NO TDPSFC BAC TESTS REPORTS RETURN FROM THE TDPSFC LAB IN REPORT BELOW .08BAC, OR BELOW. 15 BAC 70% AT +.20  IN AN “UNUSUAL PROCEDURE” IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION, LOVETT  WAS ALLOWED TO “VOLUNTARILY”  OFFER BLOOD SAMPLES TO PUBLICLY EXONERATE HIMSELF AGAINST ALLEGEDLY DUI CRASH GOSSIP AND HEARSAY BY POLITICAL ENEMIES SEEKING TO TAINT LOVETT IN HIS UPCOMING RE-ELECTION BID FOR SJCC JUDGE. LOVETT LATER WOULD CLAIM THESE SAME CONSPIRATORS BURNED DOWN HIS MOBILE HOME. SAID VOLUNTARY BAC BLOOD SAMPLE DRAW WITHOUT DUI INSTANTER TO EXONERATE LOVETT FOR POLITICAL REASONS IS A VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL POTECTION CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION IN REGARD TO THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, AS WELL AS THEFT AND MISUSE OF TDPSFC  LAD TAX PAYER RESOURCES AND FACILITIES TO PRODUCE THIS FRAUDULENT EXONERATING TDPSFC BAC REPORT FOR POLITICAL REASONS FOR LOVETT. SAID LOVETT WAS NOT CHARGED WITH DUI INSTANTER BY HIS SJCC CRONY TDPSHPO  IN THE TDPSCD/P REFVENUE FRAUD, AFTER BY WITNESSES OBSERVED DUI DRIVING OBLIVIOUSLY ON THE WRONG SIDE OF A FARM ROAD  IN A POTENTIALLY FATAL VEHICLE CRASH INVOLVING A FIFETEEN YEAR OLD GIRL ON MAY 1ST, 2017, LOVETT WITHOUT CAR INSURANCE.  MOREVOR, LOVETT WAS NOT CITED AND JAILED BY LOVETT’S TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD CRONY TDPSHPO AT SCENE OF CRASH FOR VIOLATING THE TEXAS DRIVER FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LAW AND JAILED IN VIOLATION OF THE THIS LAW BY THE TDPSHPO TO DO HIS SWORN DUITY TO UPHOLD TEXAS LAW AND IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION.  SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC OO.OO BLOOD SAMPLE EXONERATING EVIDENCE IN LOVETT’S  “UNUSUAL PROCEDURE” IS STILL PENDING.  IT T HAS BEEN OVER THREE MONTHS, USUALLY SAID TDPSFC BAC REPORT IS ISSUED  BY THE TDPSFC LAB BAC TECHNICIAN WITHIN A  MONTH, AND AS PROMISED PUBLICLY, LOVETT, NOR THE TDPSFC HAS MADE THE RESULTS OF LOVETT’S “VOLUNTARY “ NON DUI INSTANTER ISSUED TDPSCF LAB REPORT RESULTS PUBLIC.

 

RES IPSO IGITUR, ALL EVIDENCE, WITH THE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION OF  LOVETT’S STILL PUBLICLY PENDING VOLUNTARY BAC BLOOD SAMPLE TDPSCF LAB REPORT RESULTS, IS 70% OF SAID BAC TDPSCF LAB REPORTS AFTER A MONTH RETURN AT + .2 BAC,  THE REMAINING 30% ABOVE .O8, AND MOST PROBABLY +.15 BAC TO MAXIMIZE REVENUE IN THE TDPSCD/P FRAUD BY CLASS A MISDEMEANOR ENHANCEMENT THEREBY. ALL SAID BEGS THE QUESTION, CORROBORATED BY THE APPELLANT’S CASE MALICIOUSLY AND ARBITRARY TDPSCF LAB REPORT ASSIGNED  .231 BAC IN SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT, SWORN TO IN A COURT OF LAW  BY TDPSFC LAB BAC TECHNICIAN RACHEL AUBEL  AT THE HIGHEST BAC DEGREE ON THE STANDARD BAC CHART AT .231 BAC, ALL SAID  OUT OF  REVENGE  AND MALICIOUS PUNISHMENT FOR THE APPELLANT DARING TO VOICE CONSTITUIONAL OBJECTIONS TO THE PIRATING OF HIS BLOOD BY CHI ST. LUKE EMPLOYEE CHRONY THUGS OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, ALL IN ANY CASE BAC TDPSFC REPORT DEGRESS ARE ABITRARY ASSIGNED REGARDLESS OF ACTUAL BAC TESTING  BY TDPSFC LAB IN TDPSFC REPORT A SWORN COURT EVIDENCE  TO MALICIOUSLY AND FALSELY CONVICT AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, OR TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AS IN JOHN LOVETT’S UNUSUAL PROCEDURE IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD .

 

ALL SAID BEGS FURTHER QUESTIONS. AND RAISES IN ALL SAID INSTANCES A REASONABLE DOUBT,  IS THE TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORT IN THE SPECIOUS GUISE OF TDPSCF LAB “BACK LOG FAÇADE,” EMPLOYED NOT ONLY TO SUPPRESS PIRATED POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC BLOOD SAMPLES IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS THEREBY, BUT, MOREOVER, SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES OF VICTIMS, IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, FOR FRAUDULENT BAC TEST REPORT  IS NEVER EVER ACTUALLY DONE ON SAME TDPSCF LAB“PROP” BLOOD SAMPLES ARE NOT EVER DIRECTLY TESTED  BY TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST CHROMATOGRAPHIC MACHINE BUT RATHER  Chromatographic resolution and peak shape are vital in determining peak area for quantification of blood

alcohol determination. With minor alterations of few headspace parameters, the accuracy and precision

of the alcohol concentration can be drastically altered Chromatographic resolution and peak shape are vital in determining peak area for quantification of blood

alcohol determination. With minor alterations of few headspace parameters, the accuracy and precision

of the alcohol concentration can be drastically altered.   SAID PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLE  IS NEVER ACTUALLY TESTED ITSELF BY TDPSFC LAB IN THEIR TDPSCF LAB IN ANY GIVEN CASE LIKE THE APPELLANT’S CASE.THIS IS A FACT. THERE ARE OTHER BAC BLOOD TESTS THAT TANGIBLY ACTUALLY TEST THE BLOOD SAMPLE FOR BAC UTILIZED BY EMT AT FATAL SUSPECTED DUI ACCIDENT CITES OR IN CRTICAL HOSPITAL SETTINGS WHERE THE BLOOD SAMPLE IS TANGIBLY TESTED FOR BAC BY DIP STICK INDICATOR IN A VIAL. THIS METHOD OF IMMEDIATE BAC VERIFICATION BY SAID METHOD COULD BE EMPLOYED IN ALL CASES OF SUSPECT DUI ARREST WHERE THE BLOOD IS DIRECTLY TESTED FOR DUI BY EMT’S LEGALLY QUALIFIED TO DRAW OR OBTAIN A BLOOD SAMPLE AT DUI ARREST SITES. THE DIRECT BAC TESTING OF BLOOD SAMPLES BY SAID TANGIBLE TESTING METHOD BY INDEPENDENT EMT’S AT ARREST SCENE GIVES RADICALLY IN ALL WAYS SCIENTICALLY ACCURATE AT THE TIME OF THE DUI ARREST BAC RESULTS ALLOWING FOR A VALID ISSUING OF DUI INSTANTER OR RELEASE AT -.08 BAC OF DUI SUSPECT AT THE SCENE OF DUI ARREST – MUCH LIKE THE SUPPRESSED BREATHELIZER- BUT MUCH MORE ACCURATE BECAUSE THE BLOOD SAMPLE IS DIRECTLY TESTED AT TIME OF THE ARREST AND NOT 2 HOURS LATTER.  SAID DIRECT TANGIBLE BAC TESTAT DUI ARREST SCENE BY SAID BAC TEST METHOD ELIMINATES, BEING ALWAYS +TWO TO THREE DRINKS MORE ACCURATE THAN TDPSCFLAB PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLE, AND CAN IN COURT PRESENT EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION OF BAC LEVEL WITH IN AN HOUR OF THE TIME OF DUI ARREST, AS OPPOSED TO CURRESNT DUI PROSECUTION WHERE THE PROSECUTION CAN NOT PROVE  BEYOND A DOUBT WHAT BAC LEVEL OF DUI THE SUSPECT WAS AT, AT THE TIME OF HIS ARREST BY THE TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORTS SELF CERTIFIED AND SWORN AS INCRIMINATING DUI COURT EVIDENCE IN A CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY TDPSCF LAB BAC  TECHNICIAN LIKE RAUCHEL AUBEL.

 

THE RULE IN TEXAS IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF DUI IS THE TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT ISSUED WITHIN A MONTH LATER AFTER DUI ARREST AND JAILING CAN NOT BE WALKED BACK + TWO TO THREE DRINKS TO ASCERTAIN THE BAC LEVEL AT THE TIME OF DUI ARREST BUT FRAUDULENT TDPSCF LAB BAC RESULT IS PRESENTED IN COURT TO CONVICT AS IS. BUT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL (IV AMENDMENT) VALID DUI CONVICTION, THE BAC OF THE DUI SUSPECT AT TIME OF DUI ARREST WITHIN AN HOUR  MUST BE SHOWN AS EVIDENCE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. ONLY THE SUPPRESSED BREATHELIZER TEST IN SOME INSTANCES, AND VASTLY MORE SUPERIOR, THE IMMEDIACY OF BAC TANGIBLE BLOOD SAMPLE TESTING WITHIN AN HOUR OF SUSPECTED DUI ARREST, CAN PROVIDE DUI/BAC INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT RISING TO THIS IVTH AMENDMENT STANDARD.

SAID IN TEXAS RULE OF TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT STANDARD FOR DUI CONVICTION VIOLATES THE IVTH AMENDMENT AND TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE THAT FOR VALID DUI CONVICTION SINE QUA NON   TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT STANDARD FOR DUI CONVICTION VIOLATES THE IVTH AMENDMENT AND TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE THAT FOR VALID DUI CONVICTION WHICH  CANNOT BE PROVED WITH TDPSCF LAB  BAC LEVEL ENTERED AS INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE OF BAC LEVEL OF PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLE A MONTH LATER, NOT AT THE TIME OF DUI ARREST. THE IVTH AMENDMENT DEMANDS PROVING BAC AT THE TIME OF DUI OFFENSE, NOT A MONTH AFTER THE OFFENSE.

 

ANY ONE IN TEXAS FALSELY CONVICTED OF DUI  BY SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT AS  A FALSE AND ARBITRARY BAC MARKER FOR DUI CONVICTION  IN VIOLATION OF  THE IVTH AMENDMENT, AND VITH AMENDMENT AND TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE THAT FOR VALID DUI CONVICTION SINE QUA NON THE BAC OF THE DUI SUSPECT AT TIME OF DUI ARREST WITHIN AN HOUR  MUST BE SHOWN AS TRUE EVIDENCE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT   THEREBY HAVE PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

THE BREATHELIZER IN LIMITED INSTANCES, AND THE FAR SUPERIOR TANGIBLE AND IMMEDIATE DIRECT BLOOD SAMPLE BAC TEST BY EMT ALONE CAN RAISE TO MEET THE CONSTITUIONAL BAR FOR VALID DUI CONVICTION BY ADMISSABLE EVIDENCE IN TEXAS.  SAID IMMEDIATE AND DIRECT BLOOD SAMPLE BAC TESTING BY EMT ELIMINATES  TDPS BACK LOG, ALL BLOOD SAMPLE  FILING ERRORS, ALCOHOL FERMENTATION IN BLOOD SAMPLES DAYS AFTER DUI ARREST AND JAILING, SWITCHING SAMPLES, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF BAC TESTS TO BE DONE AT TDPSCF LAB IN BACK LOG HANDLED BY MORE THAN A SINGLE PERSON IN TANDEM WITH OVERWHELMING BAC TESTING BACK LOG AND FATIGUE OF TDPSFC LAB BAC TECHNICIANS LIKE RACHEL AUBEL COMPOUNDED IN EXORABLY BY  FAILURE TO MAINTAIN THROUGH OVER USE AND STRESS TDPSFC LAB BAC CHROMOGRAPHIC MACHINES AT THIS 99% ACCURANCY CONSISTENCY AND WITH A REASONABLE DOUBT IN ANY AND EVERY PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLE TEST TDPSCF LAB AT THIS STANDARD:  (TDPSCF LAB) Determining the optimal parameters are of utmost

importance to achieve the most robust and precise analysis. Therefore, it is recommended from these data that the headspace oven temperature for this instrumentation be set to 85 °C, with a headspace vialpressurization of 15 psi, for the best overall performance.

AND SINE GUA NON  With minor alterations of few headspace parameters, the accuracy and precision of the alcohol concentration can be drastically altered Chromatographic resolution and peak shape are vital in determining peak area for quantification of blood

alcohol determination. With minor alterations of few headspace parameters, the accuracy and precisionof the alcohol concentration can be drastically altered.

 

 

 

 

ALL SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST DIMINSIHED QUALITY PERFORMANCE FACTORS,  THEREBY,  SYSTEMICALLY DEGRADE TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT ACCURACY  DRASTICALLY BELOW %.99 AND THEREBY FALSIFYING SAID  SELF CERTIFIYING “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT SWORN TO BY TDPSCF LAB BAC TECHNICIANS LIKE RACHEL AUBEL IN COURT TO FALSELY CONVICT VICTIMS IN TEXAS OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD AS DUI INCRIMINATING COURT EVIDENCE SWAYING JURY AND JUDGE. SAID FALLACIOUS  TDPSCF LAB REPORTS SELF CERTIFIED BY TDPSCF LAB BAC TECHNICIANS LIKE RACHEL AT A SPECIOUS “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” IN SPITE OF DRASTIC VARIANCE OF BAC TEST ACCURACY INHERENT IN ALL SAID DIMINISHING QUALITY PERFORMANCE FACTORS BY RACHEL  AUBEL IS NONE THELESS EMPLOYED AS ENHANCING MANUFACTURED TDPSCF LAB INCRIMINATING DUI EVIDENCE TO INTIMIDATE VICTIMS OF THE TDPSCD/P TO PLEA “BARGAIN” GUILTY OF DUI IN 99% OF DUI FALSE CONVICTIONS IN TEXAS IN VIOLATION OF THE IVTH AND VITH AMENDMENTS AND TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE.

 

 

THE BREATHELIZER, BUT VASTLY MORE ACCURATE BECAUSE IMMEDIATE DIRECT BAC BLOOD SAMPLE TESTING BY EMT ET ALIUS WITHIN AN HOUR OF DUI ARREST HAS BEEN IN TEXAS  SUPPRESSED SINE QUA NON IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ,SAID TDPSC REVENUE FRAUD SINE QUA NON IS MADE POSSIBLE ONLY BY ALL SAID FRAUDULENT, NOT SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIABLE, TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORTS IN EVERY CASE OF DUI FALSE CONVICTION IN TEXAS IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

ALL SAID, MOREOVER, BEGS THE QUESTION IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ARE ALL VICTIMS PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES EMPLOYED IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ONLY AS A SPECIOUS TDPSCF LAB “PROP” AND NOT DE FACTO  BAC TESTED  IN TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY, AS TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT ISSUER SWEARS IN A COURT OF LAW.  THE BAC TEST IS NOT IN FACT  DONE, AND DOES NOT NEED TO BE DONE, AND IF DONE MUST BE DONE ACCORDING TO STRICK EXACTING SCIENTICALLY BASED STANDARDS OF PREFORMANCE TO ACHIEVE A 99% ACCURACY LEVEL AT 100% CONFIDENCE LEVEL,   IN TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY IN ORDER TO MANUFACTURE ENHANCED CLASS A MISDEMEANOR INCRIMINATING BAC +.15  TDPSCL FRAUDULENT BAC LAB REPORTS,  A SINE QUA NON IN THE COMMISSION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. THE APPELLANT’S CASE RAISES A REASONABLE DOUBT OF FOUL PLAY THAT INDEED THIS IS THE TDPSCF LAB FRAUDULENT STANDARD PRACTICE IN BAC TEST REPORTS SINE QUA NON IN PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSD/P REVENUE FRAUD. THE BAC TEST IS NOT IN FACT  DONE, AND DOES NOT NEED TO BE DONE, AND IF DONE MUST BE DONE ACCORDING TO STRICK EXACTING SCIENTICALLY BASED STANDARDS OF PREFORMANCE TO ACHIEVE A 99% ACCURACY LEVEL AT 100% CONFIDENCE LEVEL BY THE TDPSCF LAB AT 100 % CONFIDENCE LEVEL, AND NOT FRAUDULANT 99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL.

 

ALL AND EVERY SAME TDPSFC LAB BAC TEST DUI, OR POM SUBSTANCE VERIFICATION TEST ET ALIUS IS NOT SUBJECT TO RETESTING IN SAID TDPSFC LAB AND BY REPORT’S TDPSCF LAB  UNDER SIGNER  FOR BAC BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE  ET ALIUS VALIDITY PURSUANT “OF JUSTICE AND NOT CONVICTION,” SAID TDPSCF LAB REPORT RETEST PRESCINDED BY  THE FIVE COMMISSIONER TDPSCF LAB  DE FACTO NO RETESTING  OF BAC TEST REPORT RESULTS ET ALIUS  IN VIOLATION OF 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW,  VIA TDPSCF LAB WRITTEN AND OR UNSPOKEN  DE FACTO  RULE PRECLUDING BAC/POM ET ALIUS SCIENTIFIC RETESTING FOR REASONABLE PROBABLE CAUSE ON REQUEST OF DUI/POM  DEFENDANT.

 

ALL SAID IN THE CASE FOR ALL IN TEXAS CONVICTED BY TDPSCF LAB  BAC EVIDENCE OF DUI  +. O8  + .15 BAC BY TDPSCF LAB REPORT RESULTS, RES IPSO, IGITUTR  ALL IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI THEREBYHAVE BEEN DENIED THEIR 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS TO A RETEST BY SAID SAME LAB AND BAC TECHNICIAN IN PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD NOT  “PUSUANT OF JUSTICE , BUT TO THE CONTRARY, SOLELY FOR DUI CONVICTION” IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD AS IN SAID CASE OF THE APPELLANT. RES IPSO, IGITUR ALL SAID HAVE PLAINITFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

TDPSCF LAB IS NOTORIOUS AND HAS BEEN FOUND CULPABLE BY FEDERAL (DOJ) AND TEXAS STATE (TEXAS FORENSIC SCIENCE COMMISSION) INVESTIGATORS  OF FALSIFYING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE REPORTS IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 AND TO MANUFACTURE EVIDENCE IN CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE PROSECUTIONS AND DEATH ROW INMATES AS IN THE MICHAEL MORTON CASE, ALL SAID BEYOND DOING SO IN 100%. OF O TDPSFC LAB  IN THE TDPSSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD CASES IN TEXAS. ALL SAID CASES RAISE A MUTUALLY CORROBORATING REASONABLE DOUBT OF TDPSCF LAB REPORT INTEGRITY IN ALL TDPSCD/P FRAUD.

 

ALL  SAID MANUFACTURED BAC TDPSCF TEST REPORT DUI EVIDENCE FALLACIOUSLY BASED ON NON, OR DRASTICALLY INACCURATE TESTED TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS’ PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES HEAD SPACE IS ALSO UN LAWFULLY SUPPRESSED IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND THE VITH AMENDMENT SPEEDY TRIAL RIGHT ALLEGEDLY DUE TO  TDPSCF LAB BACK LOG TIME NOT BEING IMMEDIATELY TESTED BEFORE JAILING FOR DUI AS  POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE TO BE GIVEN A HEARING AT SO CALLED P.C. COURT ALL SAID  UNLAWFULLNESS A SINE QUA NON IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD. ALLEGEDLY DUE TO BAC LAB BACK LOG,AT TDPSFC LAB HARRIS COUNTY AND AS A CRIMINAL ELEMENT SINE QUA NON OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  ALL TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS IN TEXAS ARE BY INSTANTER FALSELY JAILED  THEREBY AND NEVERTHELESS DENIED WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS VIA SAID TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SUPPRESSION VIA TDPSC LAB OF  POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES  AT P.C. HEARING.  SUPPRESSED IN THE QUISE OF ALLEGED TDPSCF LAB “BACK LOG”  CAUSING THE POTENTIALLY EXONERATING PIRATED BAC BLOOD SAMPLES BY TDPSCF LAB  NOT BEING DONE- THE BAC TEST ON BLOOD SAMPLES ARE NOT DONE BECAUSE TDPSCF LAB TECHNICIANS LIKE RACHEL ABEL OVERWHELMED BY VOLUM, BACK LOGGED AND DO NOT THEREFORE DO THE BAC TESTING IMMEDIATELY WITHIN TWO HOURS (VOLO CONTENDERE BAC TESTS ARE NOT EVER ACTUALLY DONE BY TDPSCF LAB OVER A MONTHS PERIOD ALLEGED BACK LOG, SAID EVIDENCE OF SAID UNCONSTITUIONAL SUPPRESSION OF POTENTIALLY EXONERATING RUSE IN ALL CASES OF DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS.

 

 

 

RES IPSO IGITUR, CURRENT UNCONSTITUTIONAL TEXAS DUI TDPSCF LAB BAC TESTING PRACTICE IS IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DUE TO SAID SUPPRESSION OF BAC TEST PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES POTENTIALLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE NOT DONE WITHIN AN HOUR OF SUSPECTED DUI ARREST TO BE ADMISSIBLE IN COURT HEARING AS STATE’S EVIDENCE, AND BAC/DUI TEST RESULTS MADE PUBLICLY KNOWN WITHIN  24 HOURS TO BE PRESENTED IN  P.C. COURT, AND NOT SUPPRESSED AS POTENTIALLY EXONERATING DUI EVIDENCE BY THE STATE’S PROSECUTION AT P.C. HEARING, IN ORDER NOT  TO VIOLATE THE DUI SUSPECTS WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.  SAID STATE PROSECUTOR’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL SUPPRESSION OF POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE FOR A MONTH AFTER DUI ARREST AND JAILING IN A TDPSCF LAB BACK LOG RUSE CAUSE 100% OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION TO BE FALSELY JAILED IN 100% OF CASES SOLELY ON THE ALLEGED EXPERT BAC LEVEL PROBABLE CAUSE EVALUATION OF THE BAC IMPAIRMENT DEGREE BY TDPSHPO SWORN TESTIMONY SUCH AS BILLY CORLEY JR. IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, THIS SAID SOLE STANDARD FOR DUI INSTANTER JAILING BY A SINGLE DUI ARRESTING OFFICER  DOES NOT SWEAR TESTIMONY IN DUI OFFENSE REPORT OR INSTANTER TO PERSONALLY WITNESS THE DUI SUSPECT BEFORE OR AFTER ARREST DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL OF VEHICLE,  IS ARBITRARY AND FOR THIS REASON A SINE QUA NON IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. SAID SOLE DUI BAC ASSESSMENT BY INSTANTER ARRESTING OFFICER T AS A SOLE STANDARD OF DUI OFFENSE BAC IMPAIRMENT FOR PROBABLE CAUSE ALL THE WHILE BAC BLOOD SAMPLE  POTENTIALLY EXONERATING DUI EVIDENCE IS SUPPRESSED AND SUPPLANTED THEREBY AS PROBABLE CAUSE OF DUI IN HEARING IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, MOST ESPECIALLY WHEN THE INSTANTER ISSUING OFFICE HAS NOT PERSONALLY OBSERVED THE DUI SUSPECT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL BEFORE OR AFTER ARREST, AS THE SOLE STANDARD TO JUSTIFY DUI INSTANTER TO JAIL BY A SINGLE DUI OFFICER IS, AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE IN ALL DUI CASES IN TEXAS THEREBY, IS  AN  ARBITRARY STANDARD  AND THEREFORE UNLAWFUL AND THEREBY IN VIOLATION OF THE IVTH, VTH, AND VITH AMENDMENT AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN EVERY CASE OF FALSE DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS..

 

PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT DERIVES FOR ANY ONE IN TEXAS WHO IS FALSELY JAILED IN VIOLATION OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY TEXAS DUI PROSECUTION CODE.  A REASONABLE DOUBT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED THAT  BAC TEST ON PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES BY TDPSCF LAB  IS    NOT IN EVERY CASE DONE, AND IF DONE IS ALWAYS DRASTICALLY IN ACCURATE AND SAID TDPSCF LAB  BAC REPORT ISSUED   AS  SWORN COURT EVIDENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE OF DUI GUILT BAC  + .08, ENHANCED TO CAM +15 BAC. THE DUI/BAC TEST IS NOT DONE BY TDPSCF LAB  BY  BEST BY AN INDEPENDENT BAC BLOOD SAMPLE TEST LAB BEFORE  DUI JAILING TRIGGERED BY DUI INSTANTER JAILING. BAC TEST RESULTS ARE NOT MADE KNOWN BY STATE PROSECUTION  WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DUI ARREST FOR HEARING  AT P.C.COURT, BUT ALL DUI/BAC TESTS AND POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE IS UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSED  BY STSTE’S PROSECUTION AT P.C. HEARING IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUSE UNDER THE GUISE OF TDPSCF LAB  ALLEGEDLY BAC TEST DUI CASE BACK LOG  AND IN A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO MANUFACTURE ENHANCED CLASS A MISDEMEANOR +.15 BAC INCRIMINATING  TDPSFC LAB TEST REPORTS IN ALL DUI CASES IN TEXAS FOR INDICTMENT AND FOR MAKING OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT,  THE TDPSFC LAB  BAC DUI REPORTS, THEREFORE, ARE BY TDPSCF LAB ISSUED ABOUT  30 DAYS AFTER DUI  ARREST AND FALSE JAILING BY DUI INSTANTER IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS  IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

 

 

TO THIS SAID END OF IN EVERY DUI CASE IN TEXAS,  TO PERPETRATE THE COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD. BAC BLOOD SAMPLES AFTER PIRATING ARE SENT OFF BY MAIL BY DUI  INSTANTER ISSUING OFFICER IN A MUST GET  SINE QUA NON A DUI GUILTY CONVICTION IN EVERY DUI CASE IN TEXAS OR RISK  SUIT PER CAUSAM MAILICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.CONFLICT OF INTEREST, TO THE TDPSFLAB HARRIS COUNTY BY THE HUNDRED’S OF THOUSANDS YEARLY NOT TO BE DONE AND REPORT ISSUED UNTIL AFTER THREE WEEKS- ABOUT A MONTH- INSURING THE DUI SUSPECT BY INSTANTER ISSUER’S CONFLICTED DUI OFFENSE REPORT TESTIMONY  ALONE WITH NO CORROBORATING PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF ANY KIND AT P.C. HEARING  IS JAILED IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. MOREOVER, BEFORE MAILING PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES, THERE IS NO SAFEGARD, IN SAID CONFLICT OF INTEREST, THAT THE BLOOD SAMPLE CANNOT BE SWITCHED OUT OF SAID CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY THE MAILER OR BY THE TDPSCF LAB EMPLOYED BLOOD SAMPLE PIRATING CHI ST.LUKE’S MEMORIAL..

 

MOREOVER, IN TEXAS, BECAUSE OF SAID CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD. ALL OPEN CONTAINER DUI EVIDENCE BECAUSE OF  SAID CONFLICT OF INTEREST OF DUI INSTANTER ARREST OFFICER ARE UNDER A REASONABLE SUSPICION OF DOUBT OF BEING  PLANTED  AND ARE NONETHELESS PER SE “IRRELEVANT’  TO LAWFUL  DUI PROSECUTION AND NOT ADMISSIBLE  AS EVIDENCE BY TEXAS RULE OF EVIDENCE 405 IN THE COMMISSION OF THE TDPS FIVE COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM  REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

EVERY ONE IN TEXAS FALSELY CONVICTED OF DUI  IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE FIVE COMMISSIONER’S TDPS DUI/POM FRAUD  VIA  ALL SAID MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF DUI/POM DERIVES  PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT  PER CAUSAM  DRIVER’S LICENSE UNCONSTITUTIONALLY SUSPENDED FOR BAC REFUSAL (CDL, CLASS C AND B, M), OR NO INSURANCE TCIKETING AND TDPS SURCHARGES  BY TDPS IN PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, THE TDPS IS LIMITED IN MISSION BY THE TEXAS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION CODE BY LAW  TO SUSPEND LAWFULLY AND TO CONFISCATE ONLY COMMERICAL PROFESSIONAL LICENSES A/CDL, TDPS DOES NOT UNLAWFULLY IN ANY CASE FOR ANY REASON CONFISCATE, THEREBY,  NON PROFESSIONAL NON COMMERCIAL C/B/M DL BY SAID CODE. IN EVERY CASE IN TEXAS IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSC REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS ARE EXTORTED BY A GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION SCAM OF EXCESSIVE SURCHARGES AND  DOUBLE JEOPARDY SURCHARGES TO RECEIVE DRIVER’S LICENSE BACK  AND DUI OFFENSE  SURCHARGES PURSUANT OF DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD IN TANDEM WITH  THE 2003  TDPS DRIVER RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM AND ARL TEXAS ADMINSTRATION LICENSE REVOCATION PROGRAM.

 

SAID 2003 DRIVER RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM LIMITS ITSELF, MOREOVER, WARRANTS BY THIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN ANY CASE ONLY “SUSPENSION” OF  OMMERICAL PROFESSIONAL A/CDL LICENSE FOR LEGAL CAUSE ON A RURAL RAOD, NOT NON COMMERICAL NON PROFESSIONAL CLASS C, B, OR M BY LAW. YET OVER 95% OF LICENSES SUSPENDED UNDER THIS LAW CURRENTLY ARE NOT COMMERCIAL A/CDL, BUT NON COMMERCIAL CLASS C, B, OR M NOT WARRANTED TO BE SUSPENDED BY THE 2003 DRIVERS RESPONSIBILITY LAW.

 

 

 

 

 

 

DRIVER RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM AND ARL IN TANDEM WITH FIVE COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD CORRUPTION DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION REVENUE FRAUD IS TEXAS STATE WIDE AND HAS UNDER COLOR OF LAW DENIED THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF MILLIONS IN TEXANS SINCE 2003,  SUBJECTED TO FALSE IMPRISONMENT, EXCESSIVE FINES, TDPS SURCHARGES,  PROBATION FEES, AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNLAWFUL                   UNWARRANTED BY SAID LAW SUSPENSION AND CONFISCATION OF C/B/M NON COMMERCIAL DRIVERS LICENSE. RES IPSO IGITUR, ALL SAID HAVE PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CALSS ACTION SUIT AGAINST THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

APPELLANT’S CAUSE AS AN EXEMPLAR FOR PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT AGAINST THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

THE APPELLANT, AS AN EXEMPLAR CAUSE, IN SAME SAID APPEAL VIA COURT ORDER OF MANDAMUS,IN SAID  CLASS ACTION SUIT, REPRESENTS AND SPEAKS FOR  PLAINTIFFS WITH SAID COPIOUS GROUNDS OF STANDING AS PLAINTIFF  WHO THEREBY  FREELY ENJOIN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT AGAINST TDPSCD/P  REVENUE FRAUD. ALL SAID,HUNDREDS OF POTENTIAL PLAINTIFF’S WITH COPIOUS  SAID STANDINGS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT, IF NOT THOUSANDS IN SAN JACINTO COUNTY ALONE.  LOVETT AND  ACCOMPLICES,  UNABATED BY SAID MAY 19TH, 2017 MOCK NULL AND VOID MCC AT  LAW FIVE COURT ORDER, CONTINUE  AT THIS MOMENT TO PERPETRATE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE FRAUDULENT CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD NOT ONLY AGAINST THE APPELLANT ENCOURAGED BY THE LEGAL IMPOTENCE  OF SAID MAY 19TH MOCK COURT ORDER TO DISMISS EVERY OR ANY  TORT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE ,  BUT MOREOVER,  AGAINST  ANYONE IN TEXAS  ENSNARED  UNDER COLOR OF LAW  IN THE COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD VIA THE SJC COURT OR ANY OTHER COURT IN TEXAS IN COLLUSION WITH TDPSHPO AND  SJC OR ANY OTHER COURT AND OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT THROUGHOUT  TEXAS.

 

 

AS AN EXEMPLAR CASE, UNABATED BY MAY 19TH RUSE TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE , THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD CONTINUES DE FACTO ENABLED BY THE MAY 19TH COVER UP RUSE,  VIA  SJC COURT, THE MAY 19TH ORDER PROMOTING UNDER CLOAK OF INVISIBILITY  JUDGE JOHN LOVETT ‘S MALICIOUS EXTRA JUDICIAL MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN COLLUSION WITH SAID GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION IN DEFRAUDING ANYONE IN TEXAS OF LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIA TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IN SJCC,  EXHIBITED IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.

 

SAID SJC COURT AND SJCSD IS NOT ONLY A LIVING LEGACY  DERIVING FROM SAID MAY19TH MCC AT LAW FIVE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE BUT FROM  “TERROR ON THE 59” SJC SHERIFF “HUMPY” PARKER  REIGN OF FALSE ARREST ON THE 59, FALSE IMPRISONMENT TORTURE AND MURDER ABATED BY THREE DECADES OF  SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGES,  IN THE IMAGE AND LIKENESS OF JOHN LOVETT,  THE APPELLANT, UNLAWFULLY IN ABSENTIA SENTENCED  TO TWICE THE LEGAL MAXIMUM FOR DUI,   WAS BY ORDER OF LOVETT, PERSONA SOL,  JAILED FOR  365 DAYS IN THE SJC SD JAIL BUILT BY  HUMPY PARKER AND PROMINENTLY DISPLAYING HUMPY’S  PORTRAIT.

 

SUCH JUDGES LIKE JOHN LOVETT, THROUGH OUT TEXAS, IN COLLUSION WITH COMMISIONERS” TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  VIOLATE UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIA SAID MALICIOUS PROSECUTION TACTICS OVER 200,000 IN TEXAS CIVIL RIGHTS: IVTH, VTH, VITH, VIIITH, XVIITH, XXITH AMENDMENTS, WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AS WELL AS BY THE BAC TEST BLOOD SAMPLE PIRATING FROM A PRISONER OF  A FRAUDULENT MADD’S SELF RIGHTEOUS MONEY MAKING CON JOB NEO PROHIBITIONISM  REPEALED 18TH AMENDMENT DECLARED  WAR ON ALCOHOL, ( THE WAR ON ALCOHOL, PROHIBITION AND THE RISE OF THE AMERICAN STATE, LISA McGUIRR, 2016) IN VIOLATION OF ALL GOD GIVEN HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER THE GENEVA CONVENTION   FORBADING EXPERIMENTATION ON PRISONERS OF WAR.   AS THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE NO: 2016-215- SHOWS, THE.TDPS COMMISSIONERS IN TANDEM WITH JOHN LOVETT AND SJC COMMSSIONERS ARE DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE US CONSTITUTION AND THEREBY  ANNUALLY SEEK TO DEFRAUD AND TO EXTORT IN SAID MANNER, IN TANDEM WITH THE EQUALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL D.C. CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE “PROGRAM ” (RECENT POLLS SHOW 89% OF TEXANS DO NOT SUPPORT CAF AS JUST AND CONSTITUTIONAL)  ALMOST 3.5 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR FROM  ANYONE IN TEXAS ENTRAPPED IN THE STATE WIDE WEB OF THE COMMISSIONERS   TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD IN TANDEM WITH THE  2003 DRIVERS RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM/ ALR  PROGRAM GOVERNMENT/POLICE ORGANIZED CRIME CORRUPTION TENTACLES.

 

THE COMMISSIONERS TDPS POM/DUI REVENUE FRAUD IS ROOTED IN ORGANIZED CRIME- THE TILMAN FERTITA/CARDINAL DINARDO ZAPPALA MAFIA FAMILY SYDICATE ALTHOUGH NOW DIVORCED FROM THE BUSH/CLINTON/HELU SINALOA FEDERATION CARTEL NONETHELESS ARE STILL BOTH SHIELDED BY THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SERVING  AS A COMPLETE DISTRACTION AND INSIBLE MAKING SHIELD AGAINST DISCOVERY,  TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT COMPLETELY ABSORBED IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD BY  ADDICTION TO BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF MONEY SELF RIGHTEOUSLY EXTORTED UNDER THE GUISE OF CHARITY AND ADDICTION TO UNLIMITED GOVERNMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT POLICE STATE POWER,  FROM MAKING EVEN ONE ARREST, AND CONVICTION IN TEXAS EVER OF ANYONE AND EVERY ONE IN SAID ORGANIZED CRIME RACKETEERING TRAFFICKING HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVES, ARMS TO MEXICAN CARTELS, AND DRUGS VIA TEXAS VIA THE I-10 AND I-59/69.

 

ALL SAID CHILD SEX SLAVE INTERNET TRAFFICKING (CHILD PORNOGRAPHY, SO CALLED “BARELY LEGAL SITES”  BY FREE STATE GALVESTON LEGACY TILMAN FERTITA IS IN CONJUNCTION WITH ZAPALLI MAFIA FAMILY ASSOCIATE, AND CARDINAL OVERSEER OF THE CHASE/ROTHESCHILD VATICAN BANK VIATHE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON HOUSTON  CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES  AND CATHOLIC CHARITIES  CHILD AND REFUGEE TRAFFICKING SYNDICATE IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CHI-ST. LUKES AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD, “OUTPATIENT” BY UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS, WITH ABORTIONISTS FROM BAYLOR MEDICAL SCHOOL, INC “OUT PATIENT”  I-45 ABORTION CLINIC , THE LARGEST IN THE WESTERN WORLD, PROVIDING CHILD SEX SLAVING LOGISTICS OF ABORTION, STD DETECTION AND TREATMENT, AND CONDOMS TO CHILD SEX SLAVERY SEMI TRAFFICKING WHEIGH STATIONS IN THE GREATEST HUB OF CHILD SEX SLAVERY IN THE WORLD DATING BACK TO FREE STATE GALVESTON,  NOW HOUSTON, TEXAS, AT  THE SO CALLED “HIDE AWAY”  TWO BLOCKS AWAY FROM THE PP I-45, AND THE FORMER SOUTHWEST INN, ALLEGED FIREBOOMED BY A RIVAL CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING  HISTORIC MAFIA FAMILY BASED IN NEW ORLEANS IN 2015 IN RETALIATION FOR A FEIGNED “RUN WAY” PROSTITUTION CRACK DOWN BY FERTITA SYNDICATE CHAMPAIGN CONTRABUTION CONTROLLED HC SHERIFF AND  HOUSTON POLICE, GROWING OUT OF A  2011 SITDOWN BETWEEN SAID NEW ORLEANS MAFIA FAMILY AND CARDINAL DINARDO AT GUIDO’S RESTAURANT, DINARDO SPEAKING FOR TILAMAN FERITITA AND THE HOUSTON ZAPALLA ASSOCIATES DISRESPECTED SAID MAFIA FAMILY’S HISTORICAL GULF COAST PREDOMINANCE TELLING THIS FAMILY AND ITS HEAD, YOU CAN OPERATE ONLY LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON HOUSTON. THE SIT DOWN WAS IN RESPONSE TO THE DISAPPEARANCES OF FEMALE MEMBERS OF THE FERTITA FAMILY CULMINATING IN THE 2011 BEAUMONT TEXAS FIERY ABDUCTION OF 26 YEAR OLD JESSICA FERTITA, CHARGED BY HER UNCLE TILMAN WITH CHILD SEX SLAVING IN THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE PURSUANT AS A LEGISLATIVE AID FOR INFLUENCE TO LEGALIZE GAMBLING IN TEXAS, AND ALSO CHAMPAIGN FUND MANAGER FOR TEXANS FOR ABBOTT, TO ELECT GREG ABBOT AS TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL AND BEYOND, GOVERNOR AFTER PERRY’S 2012 DISASTROUS RUN FOR PRESIDENT. IN 2012, PERRY RAN FOR PRESIDENT, CARDINAL DINARDO FOR POPE, AND FERTITA FOR GLOBAL ORGANIZED CRIME BOSS. DELUSIONAL!.

.

THE MACALLEN/ TEXAS CHILD TRAFFICKING CENTER BOLSTERED GREATLY BY 9H.R. 7311 (110th): William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008,AND THE ELECTION OF BARAK OBAMA, WAS CLOSED DOWN WITHOUT OFFICIAL COMMENT BY THE BROWNSVILLE CATHOLIC DIOCESE IN EARLY AUGUST OF THIS YEAR, 2017, DUE TO THE ELECTION OF PRESIDENT TRUMP. PRESIDENT TRUMP AND AG SESSIONS HARDENED BORDER SECURITY AND ANTI ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION METHODS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY IN VARIANCE TO PRESIDENT BARAK OBAMA’S. AND ERIC HOLDERS’S DOJ “OPEN BORDERS” POLICY.  SHOOCK WAVES HAVE BEEN SENT TO FORMER PRESIDENT VINCENTE FOX, PRESIDENT MIDWIFE OF CARLOS SLIM HELU, FR. MACIEL, AND THE GARZA FAMILY OF MONTEREY VIA BORDER PATROL DIRECT OBSERVATION OF SEMIS FROM MEXICO AT THE BORDER, TRADITIONALLY TRAFFICKING HUMAN, CHILD SEX SLAVES (OMNI PRESENT IN SO CALLED MEXICAN CANTINAS) , METH, CANNIBAS, BLACK TAR HEROIN, AND COCAINE ON THE I-10 AND I-59/69..

 

CARDINAL DANIEL DINARDO, IS A DECADES LONG PITTSBURGH ZAPALLA MAFIA FAMILIY CLERICAL ASSOCIATE, AND CURRENTLY IS PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS. THIS ELECTED POSITION OF NCCB PRESIDENT MAKING DINARDO EXECUTIVE POWER OVER CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, CATHOLIC CHARITIES DOMESTICALLY AND THEREFORE CHURCH AS A FAÇADE SCHIELDED CHILD AND FAILED ISIS “REFUGEE” TRAFFICKING BEING PAID BILLIONS OF TAX DOLLARS,  WAS GARNERED FOR DINARDO IN  2015, IN TANDEM WITH BEING MADE CARDINAL ARCHBISHOP OF GALVESTON/HOUSTON 2008, BY ALLEGHENY COUNTY PENN.  DA GREGORY ZAPALLI IN CONTROL OF THE NCCB LAY CLERICAL SEXUAL MISCONDUCT BOARD. AS SUCH CARDINAL DINARDO UNDER PRESIDENT BARAK OBAMA, BEFORE PRESIDENT TRUMPS 2016 ELECTION, OVERSAW NAFTA ERA  OPEN BORDER AND INTERNATIONAL TRAFFICKING  OF CHILDREN BOLSTERED BY CHILDREN FROM CENTRAL AMERICA  SHIELDED BY  H.R. 7311 (110th): William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008  AND  2012  FAILED ISIS MERCENARY “REFUGEES” IN TEXAS VIA CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES INTERNATIONAL AND CATHOLIC CHARITES DOMESTICALLY  IN CONJUNCTION WITH DHS, THE UN, AND FRANCIS AND THE VATICAN ALL SAID  RECEIVING BILLIONS OF DOLLARS/EUROS IN TAX PAYER DOLLAR REVENUE FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND EU UNDER THE FAÇADE OF LEGAL AND CHARITABLE HUMAN/ CHILD TRAFFICKING, AND BEGINNING IN 2015 NON SYRIAN CATHOLIC EXCLUSIVELY “MUSLIM” MALE FAILED ISIS MERCENARY “REFUGEE” IMPORTATION WHICH STILL PERSISTS IN SPITE OF THE ELECTION OF PRESIDENT TRUMP AND SO CALLED “MUSLIM BAN.”.

 

THE 2006 DISMISSAL OF FR. MACIEL BY THEN POPE BENEDICT LEAD DIRECTLY TO A RUPTURE BETWEEN THE PAPACY, AND CHASE/ROTHSCHILD VATICAN BANK IN RESPECT TO HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF SFC PROFITS GARNERED FROM DRUGS, ARMS DEALING, BUT A RAPIDLY EXPANDING GROWING REVENUE STREAM INVENTED BY Fr. MACIEL, CHILD SEX SLAVING IN DANCE BARS FREQUENTED, BUT NOT EXCLUSIVELY BY, BY UNDOCUMENTED HISPANIC WORKERS CREATED BY NAFTA OPEN BORDERS. CARDINAL DINARDO, A ZAPPALA MAFIA FAMILY ASSOCIATE WAS MADE CARDINAL, AND A CARDINAL OVERSEER OF THE VATICAN BANK AND CARDINAL ARCHBISHOP OF THE FULCRUM ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON/HOUSTON TO HEAL THE RIFT AND BRING BOTH FREE STATE LEGACY TILMAN FERTITA AND THE SFC CARLOS SLIM HELU BACK INTO THE FOLD.

 

ACTUALLY, TILMAN, WHOSE FAMILY, BASICALLY MOTHER IS THE DE FACTO ARCHBISHOP OF GALVESTON/HOUSTON AB INITIO 2006 WINED AND DINED CARDINAL DINARDO PUBLICLY AT FERTITA’ MANY HIGH DOLLAR, LOW QUALITY RESTAURANTS, AND CO-OPTED DINARDO, A PRACTICING HOMOSEXUAL INTO HIS CHILD TRAFFICKING SYNDICATE AS A VELVET GLOVE CHARITABLE AND MORAL FAÇADE VIA CHI-ST. LUKE’S, BAYLOR MEDICAL SCHOOL INC. UNITED SURGICAL PARTNER’S PLANNED PARENTHOOD MEGA MEDICAL CORPORATION MERGER SHIELDED BY THE FERTITA SYNDICATE DOMINATED  SPECIOUS NEO PROHIBITION DRUG WAR TDPS COMMISSIONERS ( ALL BEHOLDEN TO FERTITA CAMPAIGN DOLLARS FOR THEIR APPOINTMENT BY THE FERTITA SYNDICATE CONTROLLED  TEXAS GOVERNOR PERRY OR ABBOT) DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD. IN 2011 SIDING WITH FERTITA AND PERRY AS PRESIDENT, SEEKING TO REPLACE BENEDICT AS POPE, DINARDO BETRAYED HIS ZAPALLA BACKERS, AND AS A CATHOLIC ARCH BISHOP OF THE CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING HUB IN THE WORLD, THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON HOUSTON, AT A SIT DOWN TOLD THE  MARCELLO MAFIA FAMILY, BITTER ENEMIES OF THE ZAPALLAS, THEY ARE ENTITLED TO NO PART OF TILMAN’S RESURRECTED FREE STATE RESSURECTION ON BOLIVAR PENNISULA OR MENDED PARTNERSHIP WITH THE SFC. AS SUCH, THE CARLOS MARCELLO SIDED WITH THE ZETAS ( THAT SEEM TO HAVE DISAPPEARED INTO THIN AIR IN 2014) AND THE ORIGINAL MEXICAN CARTAL, THE GULF COAST CARTEL, FORMER ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE PARTNER OF THE MACEO/FERTITA FREE STATE GALVESTON.

 

CARDINALDINARDO ATTEMPTED TO STRONG ARM BOTH CARLOS SLIM HELU AS A CARDINAL ARCHBISHOP WITH HIS CONTROL OVER FR.. LUIS GARZA, THE MACIEL CHOOSEN SUCCESSOR OF THE LEGION OF CHRIST, A  MORAL COVER, LIKE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, AND SFC MONEY LAUNDERING FRONT, WHETHER FR. GARZA WOULD BE ALLOWED BY BENEDICT TO SUCCEED FR. MACIEL, NOW DEAD AND BURNING IN HELL WITH HIS PARTNER IN CRIME JPII,   AND CARLOS MARCELLO III AT A SIT DOWN. THIS FAILED COMPLETELY AND DINARDO LIVES WITH CONTRACTS OUT ON DINARDO BY BOTH CARLOS SLIM HELU AND CARLOS MARCELLO III.  DINARDO’S FAILURE LEAD TO THE RESIGNATION OF BENEDICT FORCED BY THE CARLOS SLIM HELU CONTROLLED NEW YORK TIMES “SILENCE IN THE HOUSE OF GOD” AND THE CHASE/ROTHSCHILD VATICAN BANK SHUT DOWN TO DRIVE BENEDICT OUT.

THIS HISTORY IS GIVEN TO HIGHLIGHT THAT THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VIW THE HUNDRED CLUB IS ONE OF THE FEW REMAINING FERTITA SYNDICATE RACKETS STILL OPERATING. TILMAN FERTITA IS HIGHLY LEVERAGED AT LANDRY’S AND GOLDEN NUGGET, FORCED IN 2012 AS PENANCE FOR HIS ATTEMPTED REVOLT AND RESURRECTION OF THE FREE STATE TO BUY A FAILING TRUMP CASINO ON THE ATLANTIC BOARD WALK BY THE ZAPALLA FAMILY, AND PLACE A GOLDEN NUGGETT NOT IN BOLIVAR, BUT LAKE CHARLES BY CARLOS MARCELLO. FERTITA ON PAPER IS BACKRUPT SINCE 2010. FERTITA’S VISION OF RECAPTURING HIS FREE STATE LEGACY IS NO LONGER BOLSTERED BY DRUG RUNNING AND  ILLEGAL GAMBLING WHICH HAVE BEEN SUPPLANTED  BY MARCELLO AND HELU. THE TDPSCD/P AND HUNDRED CLUB IS ONE OF THE LAST REMAINING FERTITA SYNDICATE RACHETS REMAINING. TIME IS SHORT, COLLAPSE IS IMMINENT FOR FERTITA AND CARDINAL DINARDO WHO WITH THE SHUT DOWN OF CHILD AND FAILED ISIS MERCENARY TRAFFICKING  BY PRESIDENT TRUMP IS ALSO LIKE FERTITA BANKRUPTED ON PAPER WITH NO FUTURE EXCEPT PIRATING BLOOD FROM TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS AT CHI ST. LUKES.

 

THE TILMAN FERTITA SYNDICATE IN THIS TWILIGHT MOMENT ONCE DOMINATED THROUGH CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS AND CHILD SEX SLAVING AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT IN TEXAS AND THE COURT SYSTEM. LAW ENFORCEMENT BRIBERY VIA THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IS ORCHESTRATED BY BOGUS ORGANIZED CRIME CHARITIES LIKE SAM MACEO/VICTOR FERTITA’S “VELVET GLOVE” STYLE  RACKETEERING POLICE AND FIRE BENEVOLENT “HUNDRED CLUB” EMBEDDED IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SHIELDED FROM CRITICISM AS PIRACY UNDER THE COVER OF  CHARITABLE ENDS.  THE BUSH/CLINTON/HELU SINALOA CARTEL MASTERMINDED BY FR. MACIEL, MACIAL DEGOLADO, A CATHOLIC PRIEST,PUPPETEERING  POPE JOHN PAUL II VIA FR. MACIEL’S LEGIONARY OF CHRIST  CHASE/ROTHESCHILD VATICAN BANK ACCOUNT USED FOR HELU SFC MONEY LANDERING INTO THE HUDREDS OF BILLIONS  – (RENDER UNTO ROME:, THE SECRET LIFE OF MONEY IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, JASON BERRY, 2011) VIA THE ROTHSCHILD OWNED CHASE/VATICAN BANK- WAS ALSO SHIELDED BY THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD PROVIDING A TOTAL DISTRACTION  FROM DETECTION VIA ABSORPTION OF ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT IN TEXAS UNTIL THE 2006 OUSTING OF FR. MACIEL BY THEN POPE BENEDICT XVI  AS HEAD OF THE LEGIONARY OF CHRIST A SFC MONEY LAUNDERING FRONT CAUSING A BREAKIN SFC MONEY LAUDERING VIA THE CHASE/VATICAN ROTHESCHILD CITY STATE BANK

 

FURTHER COMPOUNDED BY THE OUTBREAK OF ROTHESCHILD MONEY BACKED CIA/MOSSAD ISIS TERRORIST WAR IN 2012 AGAINST ASSAD’S SYRIA TARGETING CARLOS SLIM HELU’S, THE CORPORATE HEAD OF THE SFC, MARONITE CATHOLIC LEBANESE AND SYRIAN BRETHERAN   , AND NOW PRESIDENT TRUMP’S ELECTION, WAS IN TANDEM WITH THE TILMAN  A CENTRAL BENEFACTOR OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD’ TRAFFICKING SHIELDING ON THE I-10 AND I 59.   THIS  TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ABSORPTION AS A CONCEALING TOTAL DISTRACTION INVISIBLE MAKING SHIELDING OF ORGANIZED CRIME TRAFFICKING OPERATIONS ON THE I-10 AND I-59 DUE TO ABSORPTION OF TEXAS STATES LAW ENFORCEMENT AND GOVERNMENT ON ALL LEVELS IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  PREVENTING TEXAS POLICE AND GOVERNMENT FROM INVESTIGATION, INDICTMENT, ARREST, AND CONVICTIONS DERIVING FROM SAID ORGANIZED CRIME TRAFFICKING SYNDICATES AND CARTELS IN TEXAS,  SAID TDPSCD/P  PERPETUATED  BY THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT, EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATURE,  AND IN THE COURTS  BY JUDGES LIKE LOVETT, MACK, AND DAMICO  PARTICIPATION IN SAID  SHIELDING  BY  MONEY AND POWER ADDICTION TO  THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF ANYONE IN TEXAS CHARGED WITH DUI/POM.

 

TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT,  CITY POLICE,  SHERIFF,  TDPSHPO ARE REVENUE RAVENOUS. IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THE AVERAGE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ON  GENERATES 2.5 HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS  YEARLY, THE SAME AS A CHILD SEX SLAVE. TEXAS STATE  LEGISLATORS SWORN TO UPHOLD AND TO PROTECT THE CIVIL RIGHTS AND HUMAN DIGNITY OF ALL IN TEXAS, NOT WITHSTANDING,  PROPOSE, PASS, AND ENFORCE ALL SAID UNCONSTITUTIONAL MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  LAWS SUCH AS THE 2003 DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM/ALR , LICENSE REVOCATION PROGRAM, BAC TEST REFUSAL LAW, ET AL. WHICH ARE ELEMENTS OF THE TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD AND SERVE AS GOVERNMENT AND POLICE FRONT AND AS AN INVISIBLE SHIELD- IN THE SAME WAY CARDINAL DINARDO AS PRESIDENT OF THE NCCB, POPE JP II AND NOW FRANCIS, AND FR. MACIEL AND THE LEGION OF CHRIST DO- IN  PROTECTING  AND PERPETUATING TRAFFICKING IN TEXAS, ESPECIALLY, BUT NOT EXCLUSIVELY  HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVERY  FROM INVESTIGATION, ARRESTS, AND CONVICTIONS. IT’S ABOUT MONEY AND GOVERNMENT POLICE STATE POWER.

 

 

 

THE PROVEN 100% EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD TO SHIELD AND TO PROTECT NOT TEXANS AND FOREIGN NATIONALS FROM CARTEL ORGANIZED CRIME RACKETS LIKE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, BUT  TO SHIELD AND PROTECT TILMAN FERTITA , SINALOA FEDERATION CARTEL SYNDICATED  CARDINAL DINARDO/FRANCIS ARCHDIOCESE GALVESTON/HOUSTON/NCCB PRESIDENT  (IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CHI-ST. LUKE  AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD-UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS-DR. KARPEN)   IS THE TOTAL  ECLIPSE OF COLLATERAL PROSECUTION OF ORGANIZED CRIME TRAFFICKING IN ALL FORMS BY TEXAS STATE GOVERNMENT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT: NO INVESTIGATIONS, NO ARREST, AND NOT CONVICTIONS OF TRAFFICKERS ALONG i-10 OR i-69.   TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT AND GOVERNMENT EFFORTS ARE   MONOPOLIZED  AND  ABSORBED COMPLETELY  BY FRAUDULENT  REVENUE REWARDS ADDICTION  IN THE COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM FRAUD.   RES IPSO, IGITUR,  NO LAWFUL ATTENTION ON ANY LEVEL BY STATE OR CHURCH IS EVER GIVEN TO THE ENDLESS  TRAFFICKING OPERATIONS BY SEMIS BY SAID ORGANIZED CRIME CARTEL’S ON I-10 AND I 69  TRAFFICKING SLAVES AND CHILD SEX SLAVES, DRUGS, AND ARMS, ONLY  AND EXCLUSIVELY TO DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF OVER THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND IN TEXAS EACH YEAR VIA THE COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD AND SAID TENTACLES.  THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS ARE THEMSELVES OLIGARCHS OF SAID ORGANIZED CRIME CARTELS.

 

 

 

APPELLANT’S SAID CAUSE NO 2016-215- SJCC AND SAID ESTOPPEL SERVES AS  SAID CLASS ACTION EXEMPLAR CASE OF SAID TEXAS STATE WIDE SYSTEMIC GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION AND COLLUSION IN SAID REVENUE FRAUD, GOVERNMENT/ POLICE RESOURCES  ADDICTIVELY ABSORBED BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE  FRAUD AND SHIELDING ORGANIZED CRIME TRAFFICKING FROM INVESTIGATION, ARREST, AND CONVICTION.

 

THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE NO: 2016-215- SJC COURT AS CLASS ACTION EXEMPLAR CASE

 

FACTUAL BASIS FOR EXEMPLAR STANDING IN CLASS ACTION SUIT

 

VIA TDPS OFFICERS AND SJCC ASS. DA PROSECUTORS OF THE COURT TO DEFRAUD AND TO EXTORT REVENUE AND POWER FROM THE PEOPLE IN  TEXAS STATE WIDE, SAID CAUSE NO. 2016 -215-AND FALSE CONVICTION FEB. 23, 2017 UNDER OATH IN A COURT OF LAW JOHN LOVETT PRESIDING, PERSONA SOL,  WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING, AS EVIDENCE PROVES  TDPS HPO AND SHERIFF DEPUTIES, ALL STATE WITNESSES  SWEARING IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 ENHANCED BY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE TO NON EXISTENT OFFENSE SITES BEFORE A JURY TO FEIGN JUDICIAL STANDING FOR THE SJCC AND LOVETT, AFTER FALSE ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE AND  STATE PROSECUTION FRAUDULENTLY MARKING DIFFERENT DATES OF OFFENCE FOR THE STATE’S CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ENHANCING THE IST DUI TO A CLASS A  MISDEMEANOR WITH A FRAUDULENT .231 BAC REPORT OF WHICH LOVETT DENIED THE APPELLANT’S MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHT TO HAVE RETESTED FOR VALIDITY IN CONJUNCTION WITH TDPSCF LAB POLICY NOT TO RETEST, IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION WAS ORCHESTRATED IN TANDEM BY LOVETT AND  ACCOMPLICES WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING WITH MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE  TO CONVICT ON 2/23/2017 THE APPELLANT IN ABSENTIA WITHOUT HIS FORE KNOWLEDGE OR PARTICIPATION IN VIOLATION OF HIS VITH AMEND RIGHTS. IN ABSENTIA ON APRIL 6TH  SENTENCING THE APPELLANT TO 365 DAYS  AND THEN ISSUING A FRAUDULENT  PROBATION ORDER TO COVER OVER THE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF A RELIGIOUS HATE CRIME AGAINST THE APPELLANT.  .

 

 

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR,  ALL AND EVERY TDPS DUI  BAC REPORT  UNDERSIGNED , AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE,  BY RACHEL ABEL SWEARS IN A LEGAL COURT  DOCUMENT IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001, ENHANCED BY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, EACH AND EVERY TDPSCF LAB REPORT  IS “99.7 LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE”.   THIS SELF CERTIFYING “99.7 LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE” IS A SCIENTIFICALLY UNPROVEN DISTORTION ON THE LEVEL OF SELF CERTIFYING  2+2 = 10.  SELF CERTIFYING 2+2 =10  IS EQUIVALENT TO 2+2=10 AT “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” ON GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY BECAUSE THE REPORT SAYS SO.  THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY IS RIGHT OUT OF 1984.  

 

MOREOVER, OVER 97% OF THESE MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE FALLACIOUS TDPSCF LAB UNDERSIGNED REPORTS STATE  BAC .2, OR  ON OCCASION TO PUNISH VICTIMS DARING TO QUESTION THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCAM BY EXERCISING CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS BY BAC REFUSAL, HIGHER IN APPELLANT’S CAUSE BAC. .231 BAC,   AT. BAC +.15 IST DUI IS ENHANCED FROM CLASS B MISDEMEANOR TO CLASS A.  ENHANCING THE DUI TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR DISQUALIFIES IPSO FACTO  DUI DEFENDANT  FOR DEFERRED ADJUDICATION AND PROBATION FOR FIRST DUI OFFENSE.  +.15 RAISES THE TERROR  TO 180 DAYS IN JAIL AND A  $10,000 DOLLAR FINE IF CONVICTED BY A JUDGE OR JURY TRIAL IN A COURT OF LAW PLACING ADDED PRESSURE TO PLEAD GUILTY FOR JAIL TIME SERVED-THREE DAYS, COURT COSTS, AND 12 MONTH PROBATION AND COSTS.  THE APPELLANT’S SPURIOUS .231 RAISES A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT THE BAC TEST BY TDPSCF LAB IS ACTUAL PREFORMED ON BLOOD SAMPLES, AND THAT THE GENERIC .2 BAC IS IN % BLOOD SAMPLES UNDERSIGNED BY BAC STATE EXPERT WITNESSES WITHOUT THE TEST ACTUALLY BEING DONE SINE QUA NON TO PERPETUATE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD DOES NOT ALLOW RETESTING OF SAID BAC REPORT UNDERSIGNED RESULTS BY THE UNDERSIGNER , IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, RACHEL AUBEL, BY UNWRITTEN POLICY, RES IPSO IGITUR DENYING DE FACTO APRIORI ALL AND EVERYONE IN TEXAS IN THE FRAUDULENT CONTEXT OF THE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD THEIR 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS TO RETEST (FOR JUSTICE AND NOT JUST FOR CONVICTION) DNA/BAC EVIDENCE FOR LEGALITY AND VALIDITY.   EVERY AND ALL DUI CONVICTIONS VIA PLEA BARGAINING GUILTY  IN THE SATE OF TEXAS BEG THE QUESTION, WHAT SCIENTIFIC PROOF EXISTS (NONE) THAT THE TDPSCFLAB BAC REPORT BRANDISHED AT PLEA BARGAINING IS “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL,”  AND AS SUCH, WAS THE BAC TEST ACTUALLY PERFORMED ON MY BLOOD SAMPLES, OR JUST A GENERIC RESULT ASSIGNED BAC .2 IN 90% OF CASES  TO INCREASE PRESSURE FROM INCREASED SANCTION FROM ENHANCEMENT TO CAM  TO INTIMIDATE AND COMPEL A GUILTY PLEA IN SO CALLED PLEA BARGAINING WITHOUT LEGAL COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATION PRESENT. RES IPSO, IGITUR ALL SAID PLEA BARGAINED GUILTY PLEAS FOR DUI/POM ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT PER SE.  AS SUCH, ALL DUI CONVICTS IN TEXAS IN THE FRAUDULENT CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD HAVE STANDING THEREBY IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

 

SAID TDPSCF LAB MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED  EVIDENCE  + .15  BAC REPORTS TO JUSTIFY FALSE IMPRISONMENT  AFTER THE FACT FOR DUI CLASS A MISDEMEANOR ARE  RETURNED TO THE LOCAL PROSECUTING COURT AT  A COST TO TAX PAYERS OF $60.00  THIS IS ANOTHER  REVENUE FRAUD STREAM  IN THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.  OVER 200,000   PEOPLE IN TEXAS AND THERE FAMILIES AND EMPLOYERS ARE VICTIMIZED ANNUALLY BY THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD CREATING AN ALMOST MONTH LOG BACK LOG AT THE SOLE HARRIS COUNTY TDPSCF LAB IN DOING THE BAC TEST AND AUTHORING THE BAC REPORT.   TDPS BAC FALLACIOUS  SPURIOUS REPORTS FROM TDPSFC LAB,  COME BACK ALMOST A MONTH  AFTER THE DUI OFFENSE DATE, (THE APPELLANT HAS TWO DIFFERENT OFFICIAL DUI OFFENSE DATES –ACTUALLY THREE- APRIL 4, APRIL 5, 2-16, AND DECEMBER 24, 2015- BUT THE DATE ON THE BAC REPORT IN SAID CAUSE INDICATES APRIL 4, 2016 DATE, NOT THE SENTENCING, PROBATION APRIL 6TH DATE STATING THE DUI OFFENSE DATE AS DECEMBER 24, 2015 AS WELL AS THE STATE’S CRIMINAL COMPLAINT DATE OF OFFENSE DECEMBER 24, 2015 IN SAID APPELLANT’S CAUSE DATE.

 

DURING THIS BACKLOG, THE MAILED BAC BLOOD SAMPLES FOR DUI PROSECUTION EVIDENCE ARE NOT REFRIGERATED CAUSING FERMENTATION OF ALCOHOL, IF PRESENT IN THE BLOOD SAMPLES RAISING THE BAC, THUS MANUFACTURING EVIDENCE OF DUI GUILT  AT A HIGHER BAC LEVEL.  THE HARRIS COUNTY BACK LOG SERVES AS A COVER  FOR  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SINE QUA NON,  TO GET THE $60 DOLLAR FOR THE BAC TEST REPORT , THE BAC TEST IN A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN MANUFACTURING +

DIRECTLY EMPLOYED BY TDPSCF LAB, AND RES IPSO, IGITUR HAVING NO CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST SUCH AS CHI-ST. LUKE HAS- EMPLOYED DIRECTLY BY TDPSCF TO PIRATE BLOOD SAMPLES IN PERPETATION OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONS DUI/POM REVENEU FRAUD.

ALL SAID TO BE BY TEXAS STATE DUI CODE MANDATED AND OBSERVED IN EVERY CASE OF BAC TESTING OF DUI SUSPECT UNDER ARREST THERE FORE. SAID BAC TESTING BY TEXAS DUI CODE FOLLWED, IF THE DUI SUSPECT IS -.O8 SAID SUSPECT IS EXONERATED BY THE BAC TEST AND IMEDIATELY RELEASED FROM CUSTODY. IF INDEPENDENT BAC TEST RESULT’S ARE -.15, THE SUSPECT REMAINS UNDER ARREST AND IS JUSTLY JAILED FOR DUI PROBABLY CAUSE BUT CHARGED WITH DUI – .15 CLASS B MISDEANER, RATHER THAN CLASS A + .15 BAC.

 

 

 

 

APPELLANT’S  SPECIOUS DPSTCF LAB BAC OF .231 SWORN WITH 99.7 %  DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE BY DPSCF LAB  BAC TECHNICIAN RACHEL AUBEL WHO SWORE THE SAME .231 BAC RESULT OF THE APPELANT UNDER OATH IN SJCC 2/23/17  FALSELY CONVICTED THE APPELLANT IN ABSENTIA OF A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR BECAUSE THE BAC WAS GREATER THAN .15 BAC

 

 

 

TO SWEAR IN A COURT OF LAW, AS RACHEL AUBEL DID TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT, THE BAC TEST IS CONFIDENCE LEVEL 99.7 IS SCIENTIFICALLY BASELESS. NO ONE KNOWS IN TRUTH HOW ACCURATE THE BAC  IS.  USING THIS SPECIOUS SCIENTIFIC DISTORTION OF SCIENTIFICALLY UNKNOWN FACT-THE TRUTH IS NO ONE KNOWS WITH ANY TYPE OF CERTAINTY HOW ACCURATE THE BAC TEST IS FOR NUMEROUS REASONS, , WITHOUT BENEFIT OF ATTORNEY IN PLEADING, DISTRICT ATTORNEY SEEKING ONLY CONVICTIONS AND NEVER JUSTICE, USE TDPSFCL SPECIOUS BAC REPORT HOAX TO  INTIMIDATE OUT OF IGNORANCE AND DEFRAUD  ALMOST 99.7 % OF TEXANS TO PLEAD GUILTY TO DUI BASED ON TDPSCFLAB MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE IN DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BAC TEST.

 

  IN SAID CAUSE 2016-215, SJCC ASS. DA SJC MARK BOEMIO IN A PHONE CONVERSATION WITH THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE INQUIRING TO KNOW HIS BAC TEST RESULTS ATTEMPTED TO USE THIS COMPLETE FRAUD, AS HE HAS DONE IN ALMOST 99% OF ALL DUI CASES IN SJC TO GET THE APPELLANT TO PLEAD GUILTY, DEFRAUDING THE APPELLANT TO GIVE UP HIS RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY JURY. THE DEFENDANT PRO SE HEARING FROM HIS SJCC DAO FILE THAT SAID BAC WAS .231 HELD THE PHONE AWAY AND LAUGHED.. THE TDPS OFFICER, BILLY CORLEY JR. AS WELL AS THE BLOOD TAKERS AT CHI-ST.LUKE WERE PERSONALLY INCENSED THE APPELLANT HAD REFUSED THE BAC TEST AND TOLD THEM THEY WERE VIOLATING AS DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE CONSTITUTION THE IVTH AND VTH AMENDMENTS AS WELL AS THE GENEVA ACCORDS IN THEIR SELF PROFESSED WAR ON ALCOHOL-THIS IS WHAT NAZI’S DO TO POLITICAL PRISONERS.  THESE WORDS BY THE OUTRAGED APPELLANT TRIGGERED A REVENGE BAC.231 SPURIOUS REPORT BY CHI ST. LUKE’S AND THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

IN RETALIATION FOR SPEAKING ABOUT THE VIOLATION OF SAID RIGHTS, THE TDPS BAC REPORT CAME BACK FROM HARRIS COUNTY AT BAC  .231- ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT. HIGHER THAN .15 DISQUALIFIES 1ST DUI  SUSPECTS FROM DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION PROGRAMS AND  ENHANCES THE 1ST DUI OFFENSE TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY 180 DAYS IN JAIL AND A $10,000 FINE. ASS. DA. MARK BOEMIO OVER THE PHONE THREATENED THE APPELLANT WITH THIS DRACONIAN PUNISHMENT IF HE DID NOT “PLEA BARGAIN” GUILTY.  WHEN APPELLANT SAID (.231 BAC) IT CANNOT POSSIBLY BE THAT-BOEMIO SAID, “I DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT FORENSIC SCIENCE, BUT I DO KNOW THIS, THE BAC IS 99.7 “LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE ”   AND BAC OVER .15  IS SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE AT THAT LEVEL  1ST DUI IS ENHANCED FROM  CLASS B TO CLASS A  MISDEMEANOR”  YOU ARE FACING SIX MONTHS IN JAIL AND 10,000$ FINE IF FOUND GUILTY,    WHEN APPELLANT DECLINED TO PLEA BARGAIN  EVER, SAYING THE BAC  .231 TEST REPORT RESULTS  ARE NOT POSSIBLE, BOEMIO RESPONDED WITH A DISAUSIVE DIATRIBE STATING ALTHOUGH IN OUR SYSTEM YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO RETEST,  DE FACTO TDPS BAC REPORT  RETESTING IS IMPLAUSIBLE  BE CAUSE OF (YOUR) EXPENSE  AND FINDING A MUTUALLY ACCEPTABLE  LAB TO RETEST LAWFULLY CREDIBLE TO RETEST. BOEMIO CONTINUED SAYING  HE DID NOT KNOW IF IT WAS POSSIBLE TO SPLIT THE SAMPLE FOR RETESTING-ALL LYING DISTORTIONS BY BOEMIO TO DISSAUDE THE APPELLANT FROM CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY  OF THE BAC RESULTS BY A RETESTING.  THIS ATTEMPTED AND UNSOLICITED  FRAUDULENT PLEA BARGAN CAMPAIGN  BY BOEMIO, A LIAR, INDICATES THE APPELLANT’S REFUSAL TO PLEA BARGIN AND SETTLE IS EXTREMELY RARE AND THE STATE PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P HAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOT ALLOWING FOR A DISPUTED BAC RETEST IN UNIVERSAL VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW.  IN CONCLUSION,  FINALLY, EXASPERATED, BOEMIO SAID, IF THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY HE WOULD ONLY GET TWO TO FOUR MONTHS OF PROBATION, AND COURT COSTS OF ABOUT TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS.  TEMPTING, BUT IT WAS ALL A LIE.  2ND DUI IS DRASTICALLY WORSE THAN THE FIRST.  IN PLEADING GUILTY TO A LIE, THERE WAS NO GUARANTEE THE APPELLANT WOULD NOT NOR COULD NOT BE INNOCENTLY TRAPPED AGAIN IN THE SAME TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCAM DRIVING ON THE I-59.

 

THE BLOOD DRAWERS AT CHI-ST. LUKE A MONTH BEFORE, JUSTIFIED THEMSELVES IN FACE OF THE APPELLANT’S CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST THEM FOR VIOLATED HIS CIVIL AND GENEVA CONVENTION HUMAN RIGHTS BY ARRESTED AND UNDER DURESS AND THREAT STEALING HIS BLOOD TO INCRIMINATE HIM,  ROD HUPPARD WHO STOLE THE BLOOD ESPOUSING THE END ALWAYS JUSTIFIES THE MEANS, EVEN AND ESPECIALLY AN EVIL MEANS SAID, WE DO THIS TO KEEP DRUNKS LIKE YOUR  FROM KILLING CHILDREN IN CAR ACCIDENTS. A MANTRA OF MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING, A NEO PROHIBITION NON PROFIT FRAUD ORGANIZATION DENOUNCED AS SUCH BY MADD’S FOUNDER CHRISTINE LEICHTNER AS NEO PROHIBITIONIST AND NOT TAKING DRUNKEN DRIVERS OF THE ROAD BEFORE THEY KILL THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.  THE APPELLANT SUPPORTS MANDATORY SENTENCE OF 180 DAYS AND ABSOLUTE SUSPENSION FOR A YEAR OF DRIVER’S LICENSE FOR ANY ONE VALIDLY CONVICTED OF DUI AT THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT BAC  .231.   IF THAT IS THEIR NOBLE LIE- KEEPING DRUNKS LIKE YOU OFF THE ROAD SO YOU DO NOT KILL CHILDREN- IN JUSTIFYING THIS TDPS C/DUI REVENUE FRAUD, WHY WOULD BOEMIO  OFFER A DUI  DEFENDANT  AT BAC  .231, ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT OFF SO LIGHTLY JUST SO THE APPELLANT WOULD NOT PURSUE A RETESTING OF THE OBVIOUSLY FRAUDULENT .231 BAC RESULT. APPELLANT SUPPORTS THE LAW IF YOU ARE LAWFULLY CONVICTED OF 1ST DUI AT .231-AT .231 BAC LEVEL YOU ARE COMPLETELY IMPAIRED OF ALL MENTAL AND PHYSICAL CAPACITIES, AND AS SUCH AN IMMINENT MURDEROUS ACCIDENT BEHIND THE WHEEL IN EVERY INSTANCE,  YOU SERVE 180 DAYS WITHOUT PROBATION, A TEN THOUSAND DOLLAR FINE, AND ONE YEAR SUSPENSION OF LICENSE.  THE  APPELLANT IS DUI LAW ABIDING  AND THIS IS  THE REASON THE APPELLANT WOULD NOT PLEAD “TO GET OFF EASY”  IN THIS MALICIOUS FRAUD. BUT 99% DO!

 

 

 

RACHEL AUBELS SAID FALSE TESTIMONY  2/23/17 SJCC-2016-215- RAISES A REASONABLE DOUBT IN ALL DUI CASES IN TEXAS THAT TDPS BAC TESTS ARE NOT ACTUALLY DONE AND A  TRUE BAC TEST REPORT RESULT IS VALIDLY AND ACTUALLY REGISTERED IN THE TDPSFC LAB  REPORTS. IN ALL CASES. ALL TEXANS CONVICTED WITH BAC EVIDENCE FROM SAID LAB OF DUI CLASS A HAVE STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT PERCAUSAM  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, ALL TDPS DUI BAC REPORTS ARE DONE BY THE FORENSICS TDPSFC LAB IN HARRIS COUNTY, THE TDPSFC LAB  IN HARRIS COUNTY IS NOTORIOUSLY CORRUPT AND BACKLOGGED. JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICED DENIED. THE BAC MONTH LONG BACKLOG IS A  VIOLATION OF  THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND THE VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR AND SPEEDY TRIAL. THE BACK LOG SUPPRESSES POTENTIALLY EXONERATING PHYSICAL EVIDENCE INSURING IN VIOLATION OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS THE SUBJECT WILL BE JAILED UNTIL BAILED OUT.    TDPS HARRIS COUNTY LA HAS BEEN SEVERAL TIMES FEDERALLY INVESTIGATED FOR MANUFACTURED OF EVIDENCE IN NUMEROUS CASES AND FOUND CULPABLE  BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT OF MANUFACTURING EVIDENCE, I.E. MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

 

 TDPSFCL HAS A SYSTEMIC CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A GOVERNMENT MONOPOLY ON BAC REPORTS STATE WIDE. THE 60$ TAX PAYER CHARGE IS PART OF THE DUI/POM PROSECUTION CASH COW SCAM.

 

  TDPSCF LAB BAC TESTING NOT ACTUALLY BEING DONE OR THE POSSIBILITY OF SAID BAC RESULT BEING RETESTED PURSUANT OF THE MICHAEL MORTON LAW AS THE APPELLANT REQUESTED AND WAS AB INITIO DENIED HIS RIGHT TO RETEST UNDER SAID LAW BY LOVETT, ARE EVIDENCE IN  THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE AND IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.  IN BOTH THESE CRIMINAL ELEMENTS OF  DUI FRAUD PURSUANT OF ILL GOTTEN REVENUE BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  IS EVIDENT BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT IN RACHEL AUBEL FALSELY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT OF 1ST DUI+. 15 IN SJCC AS A TEXAS STATE EXPERT WITNESS ON 2/23/17 WITH A TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT UNDERSIGNED BY HER.

 

 JOHN LOVETT, IN DISCOVERY COURT SJCC JANUARY 9TH, 2017, DENIED THE APPELLANT HIS 2012  MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS “STATE PROSECUTORS SHOULD WORK FOR JUSTICE NOT CONVICTIONS’ TO TEST DNA-BAC EVIDENCE IF THERE IS A REASONABLE DOUBT OF VERACITY PURSUANT OF JUSTICE, NOT CONVICTION.  APPELLANT MADE MOTION TO RETEST BAC. 231 FRAUDULENTLY ATTRIBUTED TO THE APPELLANT AND WROTE A COURT ORDER FOR LOVETT TO SIGN THAT LOVETT ORDER RACHEL AUBEL WHO ON 2/23/2017 WAS A WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION FOR THE SAME BAC.231 UNDER OATH, TO RETEST HER INITIAL REPORT RESULTS OF BAC. 231.  ON JANUARY 9TH IN DISCOVERY COURT THE ASS. DA, MARK BOEMIO OBJECTED TO SAID ORDER WRITTEN BY THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE AND SAID THEY TDPSFL HAD BEEN ASKED BEFORE SEVERAL TIMES  BY THE SJC DA OFFICE AND ALWAYS REFUSED TO HAVE THEIR OWN TECHNICIANS RETEST A PREVIOUSLY TESTED SAMPLE AND WILL NO DO IT.  BOEMIO IS A LIAR, I DOUBT BOEMIO ASKED EVER FOR A BAC TEST  EVEN ONCE, BUT BOEMIO’S POINT IS TAKEN NEVERTHELESS AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE  SO IN ALL DUI DEFENSE CAUSES, THE POLICY OF THE  TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY IN ALL  DUI BAC RETESTING IS DENIED IN VIOLATION BY THE STATE’S PROSECUTION OF EVERY DUI CONVICT IN TEXAS CONVICTED WITH MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED  TDPSCF LAB  BLOOD TEST EVIDENCE OF THEIR 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW DNA/ABC RETEST RIGHTS.

 

 RES IPSO IGITUR, IN BAC TESTING, APPELLANT’S  CAUSE AND IN ALL DUI CONVICTION CAUSES IN TEXAS , MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED NOT ONLY BY JOHN LOVETT, BUT IN EVERY DUI CASE  IN TANDEM WITH  RACHEL AUBEL AND THE TDPSFCL.  APPELLANT THEN MADE MOTION TO HAVE A THIRD PARTY LAB RETEST THE BLOOD SAMPLE WHICH APPELLANT KNEW WAS SPURIOUS AND VINDICTIVE  AT BAC. .231.  SAID .231 BAC  WAS NOT IN ANY WAY EVIDENCED  BY BILLY CORLEY’S DUI P.C. OFFENSE REPORT, (EXHIBIT 6).  TO THE CONTRARY AT THE TIME OF HIST FALSE ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE ON APRIL 4TH, 2016 BY SJCDS JESSE SLAUGHTER ON THE I-59 LIBERTY COUNTY, THE APPELLANT’S  BAC  WAS OO.OO .  THE APPELLANT COULD SWEAR UNDER OARTH IN A COURT OF LAW WITH 100% SCIENTIFIC BAC CERTAINTY BY HIS LIVER THAT HE , THE APPELLANT HAD NO ALCOHOL IN HIS BLOOD AT THE TIME OF HIS FALSE ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCAM.

 

TO CONTINUE…

 

JOHN LOVETT,  SEEMINGLY ALWAYS INTOXICATED AS WITNESSED BY THE APPELLANT AT ALL  COURT HEARINGS  ATTENDED,  ALLEGEDLY IN HEARSAY, LOVETT DRINKS LITERS OF DIET COKE SPIKED WITH JACK, IF SO , (APPELLANT COULD OBSERVE LOVETT INTOXICATED, BUT COULD NOT KNOW THE TRUE CONTEXTS OF SAID LITERS’)  IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF EVERY DEFENDANT WHO GOES BEFORE LOVETT IN SJCC,   BELLIGERENTLY SAID, “YOU LOST THAT!” DENYING APPELLANT HIS MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS TO RE TEST THE SPURIOUS  BAC FOR VERACITY BY THE TDPSCFL FORENSIC SCIENTIST STATE BAC EXPERT WITNESS RACHEL AUBEL. 

 

 

ALL ENJOINING  SAID CLASS ACTION  AS PLAINTIFF  HAVE ENHANCED STANDING , I.E. ANYONE IN  TEXANS WRONG BY THIS TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM CASH COW FRAUD, IN BEING  INJURED MORE GRIEVOUSLY  BY  FRAUDULENT DUI CHARGES ENHANCED TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR  BY SAID MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE BAC REPORTS.  90% OF BAC RESULTS IN TEXAS ARE AT .20 AND HIGHER- NOT ONE REPORT OUT OF MILLIONS THUS FAR HAS EVER COME BACK FROM SAID LAB BELOW .O8, BECAUSE OF A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO MANUFACTURE AND SUPPRESS EXONERATING EVIDENCE BELOW BAC .08  IN BLOOD SAMPLES,  AND ABOVE-. ON THE CONTRARY IN PERPETRATING THE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD OVER 90% OF BAC BLOOD SAMPLES  IN ALL BAC BLOOD SAMPLES ALLEGEDLY SUBMITTED IN TEXAS TO THE TDPS CF LAB TRIGGER TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORTS  THE  .2 OR OVER. THIS RUSE GUARANTEES THE TDPSHPO INSTANTER OFFICER, DUI PROSECUTING COURT AND JAIL CANNOT BE SUED FOR FALSE ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT- MALICIOUS PROSECUTION- BY A DUI/POM THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCAM PLAINTIFF. AS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

 THE VERY  SAME CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO INSURE BY MANUFACTURED OF BAC REPORTS ABOVE .15 IN ALL CASES, AN SUPPRESSION OF ALL BLOOD SAMPLE EXONERATING EVIDENCE OF BAC.  -.O8,  MANDATES  UNCONSTITUTIONAL “NO REFUSAL” TAKING OF BLOOD IN EVERY DUI PROSECUTION WHEN AN INSTANTER IS ISSUED BY TDPSHPO,  NO MATTER IMPLIED VOLUNTARY AND EVEN IN SPITE OF THE SIGNED DIC 24 REFUSAL OF THE DUI/POM SCAM VICTIM.  UNLIKE OTHER STATES, LIKE NEBRASKA, IN TEXAS, IN EVERY CASE, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, BLOOD SAMPLE MUST BE TAKEN IN EVERY DUI CASE FOR MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE  BAC +.15 AND TO SUPPRESS EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE AT BAC .08 TO PRECLUDE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SUITS  LIKE THIS CLASS ACTION SUIT FROM OCCURRING AND SUSTAIN THE DUI/POM SCAM FROM SAID LAW SUIT FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

 

 

 

AS SUCH, TDPSFC LAB  FORENSIC  TDPSFC LAB  FORENSIC  IS ANNUALLY TASKED WITH OVER 2OO,OOO  FRAUDULENT MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE FOR DUI PLEA BARGAINING CONVICTIONS BAC REPORTS AT $60 A SHOT TO BE PAID FOR BY THE LOCAL COUNTY TAX PAYER.  BACKLOGGED BY THE TOTAL ABSORPTION OF THE TEXAS COURTS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD TO MASS PRODUCE SAID TDPSCF LAB  +.15  BAC REPORT , THE TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY, EVEN IF THEY HAD TIME AND NON DEDICATED PERSONAL,  HAVE  NEVERTHELESS  NO FINANCIAL OR MORAL WORK ETHIC  TO TEST FIVE TO SIX THOUSAND UNTESTED RAPE KITS FROM  HARRIS COUNTY ALONE WHICH HAVE SAT FOR YEARS AND ARE PRESENTLY STILL  NOT TESTED AND PROCESSED, BECAUSE PROCESSED RAPE KITS PURSUANT  OF  PROSECUTING AND CONVICTING RAPISTS DOES NOT PAY $60 A SHOT, AND TAKES TIME TO ACTUALLY DO THE DNA TESTING, AND WHEN DONE TAKES THE STATE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICES’  COURTS AND  LAW ENFORCEMENT AWAY FROM THE DUI/POM SCAM. THE TDPSCF LAB DOES TAKE THE TIME AS SHOWN BY RECENT FEDERAL INVESTIGATION TO MANUFACTURE DNA EVIDENCE FOR CONVICTS ON DEATH ROW IN TEXAS  (OR SUPPRESS EXONERATING  DNA RETESTING AS IN THE CASE OF MICHAEL MORTON WHO SPENT 26 YEARS AS AN INNOCENT MAN IN TEXAS ON DEATH ROW) AND DRUG OFFENSE CASES OTHER THAN DUI/POM.

 

 SAID BAC “CONFIDENCE LEVEL” 99.7.A DISTORTION APPEARING ON ALL TDPS BAC REPORTS  INVALIDATING THEM AS EVIDENCE OF DUI GUILT IN ALL CASES GIVES STANDING AS PLAINTIFFS TO ALL IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI THEREBY.

 

 ALCOHOL IN BLOOD FERMENTS CAUSING AN INCREASING BAC LEVEL IF THE SAMPLES ARE NOT REFRIGERATED, BLOOD SAMPLES ARE NOT REFRIGERATED DURING CHAIN OF CUSTODY OF EVIDENCE. THE DUI INSTANTER ISSUING TDPSHP OFFICER ENGENDERS A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST  MANDATING MANUFACTURE/SUPPRESSING OF BLOOD SAMPLE BAC EVIDENCE INSURING THE BLOOD SAMPLES  DO NOT DIRECTLY GENERATE A REPORT BELOW .O8, OR THE TDPSHP OFFICER WHO ISSUES THE INSTANTER AND ACCOMPLICES INCLUDING PRESIDING JUDGE AND JAIL CAN BE SUED BY PLAINTIFF FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AS IN APPELLANT’S CAUSE SO IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT. ONLY TDPSHP OFFICERS ALONE AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT IN A FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAM TO COMBAT DUI,  ISSUE INSTANTERS- WHICH DE FACTO-WARRANT THE DUI SUSPECT IN CUSTODY IS JAILED FOR 72 HOURS  BEFORE BAIL BASED ON THE OFFICER’S BAC ASSESSMENT AND SWORN OFFENSE REPORT TESTIMONY ALONE.

 

 

 

THE ONLY EVIDENCE IS  DUI INSTANTERS ARE ISSUED BY TDPSHP OFFICERS IN 100% OF THE DUI CASES  AFTER ARREST.  RES IPSO, IGITUR, UNLESS THE BLOOD SAMPLE AFTER INSTANTER TRIGGERS A REPORT ABOVE BAC .O8, OVER 90% AT BAC .2 OR ABOVE, THE OFFICER AND ACCOMPLICES IN THE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD DUI/POM SCAM  CAN BE SUED FOR TIME OF FALSE   JAILING BY PLAINTIFF, AND A SECOND JUDGEMENT FOR ALL HARM DONE ON ANY LEVEL.

 

 

 

RELINQUISHING BLOOD SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY, THE INSTANTER OFFICER S  MAILS THE BLOOD SAMPLE OF NOW JAILED DUI SUSPECT TO THE TDPSCF LAB IN HARRIS COUNTY LAB. IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, AND IN ALL DUI CASES IN TEXAS, THE APPELLANTS  BLOOD WAS STOLEN UNDER THREAT OF VIOLENCE VIA COLOR OF LAW VIOLATION OF SAID CIVIL RIGHTS, ESPECIALLY THE IVTH AND VTH, AND  ILLEGALLY SEIZED TO INCRIMINATE THE APPELLANT IN A GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION SCAM. MOREOVER, THE BAC BLOOD SAMPLE TAKEN CAN BE SWITCHED OR ALTERED  AT ANYTIME, BY ANYONE, UP TO THE POINT OF MAILING, OR AT THE LAB.  THERE ARE NO SAFE GUARDS TO PREVENT THIS INHERENT IN THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY.  THIS GIVES PLAINTIFF STANDING TO ANY ONE CONVICTED ON DUI IN TEXAS  IN THE CONTEXT OF THE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  SAID TDPS HARRIS COUNTY LAB DOES HUNDRED’S OF THOUSANDS INTO THE MILLIONS  OF THESE PER SE FRAUDULENT UNSECURED +.15  BAC REPORTS FOR THIS SCAM ALSO ADDING TO THE LACK OF QUALITY CONTROL OF THE BAC REPORT EVEN IF THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY WAS NOT A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND THE BAC TEST REPORT PER SE SPECIOUS  IN THE FIRST PLACE. THE MORE INVOLVED IS TESTING THE MORE THE PROBABILITY OF ERROR. THIS IS THE REASON WHY THE VERY SAME TDPSCF LAB BAC TECHNICIAN WHO UNDERSIGNS DISPUTED BAC REPORT MUST IN ACCORD WITH THE MICHAEL MORTON LAW, RETEST THE UNDERSIGNED REPORT’S RESULTS WHEN MOTION IN DISCOVERY.

 

JOHN LOVETT IS THE FIRST AND ONLY  PERSON IN TEXAS TO VOLUNTARILY GIVE BLOOD SAMPLES TO THE TDPSFCLAB WITH NO DUI INSTANTER ISSUED AT AN ACCIDENT SCENE WHERE LOVETT ADMITS FAULT AND WAS NOT CITED FOR NOT HAVING INSURANCE BY HIS TDPSHPO CRONIES IN SJC IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  

 

 

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A TDPS BAC REPORT FROM THE HARRIS COUNTY LAB  RETURNED BELOW BAC .O8. THE FIRST INSTANCE OF A BAC REPORT RETURNED BELOW .08, OR MOST LIKELY .OO  WILL MOST LIKELY BE  SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT’S “VOLUNTARY” BAC BLOOD DRAW WITH NO DUI INSTANTER  ISSUED ON MAY1ST, 2017.  LOVETT’S VOLUNTARY BAC TEST RESULT HAVE CERTAINLY BEEN PROCESSED BY NOW  (BECAUSE OF LAB BACKLOG THE SPURIOUS BAC REPORTS USUALLY TAKE A MONTH) AND THE REPORT MADE, AND YET THE TDPS NOR LOVETT HAVE MADE THE RESULTS PUBLIC AS  WAS PROMISED BY BOTH LOVETT AND THE TDPS AS REPORTED IN San jacinto News Times, Thursday, May 11, 2017:

 

 

JOHN LOVETT, INTOXICATED-APPELLANT CONTENDS AS ALWAYS- ON MAY, 1, ON FM 2666   “IN AN UNUSUAL PROCEDURE”-(IT’S CALLED COVER UP)  A DPS REPORT DIDN’T LIST THIS TWO DRIVERS INVOLVED IN A  VEHICLE ACCIDENT- San jacinto News Times, Thursday, May 11, 2017- )

 

SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT AND THE TDPSHP PERPETRATE IN TANDEM SAID DUI/POM SCAM AS IS EVIDENT IN APPELLANT’S APPEAL .  COVERING UP FOR CRONIES,  PART AND PARCEL IN TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  TRIGGERED  LOVETT BEING GIVEN AN “UNUSUAL PROCEDURE” I.E. SPECIAL TREATMENT, BY TDPSHPO,  TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE BY NOT BEING CHARGED WITH DUI AT THE SCENE OF AN ACCIDENT WHERE LOVETT ADMITS FAULT.  SUCH A RECKLESS  ACCIDENT IS INDICATIVE OF BAC .231.   AND LOVETT BY THE TDPSHPO AT TAX PAYER EXPENSE TO VOLUNTARILY DRAW BLOOD SAMPLES AT CRONY FACILITY CHI-ST. LUKES FOR A FRAUDULENT BAC TEST EXONERATING LOVETT OF GOSSIP VIA POLITICALLY MOTIVATED HEAR SAY LOVETT WAS DUI AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT. LOVETT WAS DUI AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT.

 

SAID  “UNUSUAL”  PROCEDURE BY TDPSHPO IS A VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION AND AS SUCH  GIVE STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT AS PLAINTIFF TO ALL IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI IN THE CONTEXT OF  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD NOT AFFORDED SAID ” UNUSUAL PROCEDURE” BY TDPSHPO IN BEING CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS.

 

ACCORDING TO THE NEWSPAPER ACCOUNT,  LOVETT WAS SEEN  BY A WITNESS AT THE ACCIDENT SCENE RECKLESSLY SWERVING ACROSS the yellow MEDIAN LINE UNTIL STRIKING ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD  THE PRIUS OF A FIFTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL WITH LOVETT’S TRUCK. SUCH RECKLESS DRIVING AND ACCIDENT IS AN INDICATOR OF BAC.231  LOVETT WAS NOT CITED BY THE DPS HP OFFICER FOR DUI, NOR RECKLESS DRIVING AND CAUSING OF POTENTIALLY FATAL COLLISION, NOR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- NO INSURANCE- A CLASS B MISDEMEANOR AT THE TIME OF THE CRASH.- AGAIN LOVETT AND TDPSHP ARE CRONIES IN DUI/POM SCAM CRIME WHOSE  PREDATORY PERIMETERS LOVETT HIMSELF DRUNK  HAD CROSSED INTO ON  MAY 1ST.

 

Lovett told dps at scene of the dui  HE WAS DISTRACTED BY TEXTING TRYING TO ARRANGE AN EMERGENCY HEALTH   DETENTION WARRANT AS PART OF MY OFFICIAL DUTIES, AND WAS ON MY WAY TO THE COURTHOUSE ( APPELLANT INTERVIEWED SEVERAL  SJCC DEFENDANTS,  WHILE  FALSELY AND MALICIOUSLY IMPRISONED IN SJC JAIL  BY THIS COMPASSIONATE, DUTY DRIVEN  SJCC JUDGE,  ALL STATE LOVETT IS ALWAYS INTOXICATED AT THEIR HEARINGS  IN THE COURTHOUSE- THE APPELLANT IN ALL HEARINGS HE HAS HIMSELF ATTENDED  CORROBORATES.)  “LOVETT VOLUNTERILY SUBMITTED TO A BLOOD DRAW” “TO PROVE  THAT THERE WAS NO IMPAIRMENT IN AN EFFORT TO AVOID RAMPANT SPECULATION .”

 

BY TEXAS BAC TEST LAW, THE  BAC TEST, PROCESSED AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE, CANNOT BE ADMINISTERED VOLUNTARILY OR NOT VOLUNTARILY UNLESS AN INSTANTER FOR DUI HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR PROBABLE CAUSE BY THE TDPSHP OFFICER AT THE DUI OFFENSE SCENE.  LOVETT WITH  HIS TDPS DUI/POM  REVENUE FRAUD  CRONIES  BY SAID UNUSUAL PROCEDURE  IS A COVER UP TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE FOR THIS 15 YEAR OLD GIRL STRUCK BY LOVETT DUI AND PERSERVE LOVETT AS A SJCC  JUDGE CRONY IN  TDPSCD/P REVENEU FRAUD.  IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION.

 

PROVIDENTIALLY ON MAY 9, APPELLANT FALSELY JAILED BY LOVETT’S APRIL 6TH FRAUDULENT PROBATION ORDER FOR 60 DAYS, MONDAYS TO FRIDAYS, WEEKENDS OFF, (AN UNHEARD OF PROBATION JAILING ARRANGEMENT) SPOKE WITH THE WRECKER IMPRISONED IN SJC JAIL FOR AN UNPAID TICKET WHO TRANSPORTED LOVETT’S BADLY DAMAGED TRUCK FROM THE DUI ACCIDENT SCENE. SAID WRECKER REPORTED, LOVETT, “WHO IS DRUNK ALL THE TIME IN COURT AS WELL AS OUT” HAD THE COLLISION BECAUSE HE WAS DRUNK.  WRECKER SAID HE WROTE AT THAT TIME BY LAW  THE COLLISION WAS DUI  IN HIS WRECKER LOG BECAUSE IT IS REQUIRED INFORMATION BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES.

JOHN LOVETT IS ON PUBLIC CRIMINAL RECORD IN ANOTHER COUNTY AS HAVING ONE CLASS A +.15 DUI MISDEMEANOR, THAT THE APPELLANT HAS KNOWLEDGE OFF.  THIS MAY HAVE INFLUENCED THE TDPSHPO’S UNUSUAL PROCEDURE TO KEEP LOVETT FROM JAIL TIME AND OR ELECTION BY REMOVED AS SJCC JUDGE.

 

 

THE NEWSPAPER ACCOUNT CONCLUDES, “DPS IS WAITING ON PENDING TOXICOLOGY RESULTS TO COMPLETE REPORTS.”  THIS AGAIN IS VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION,  AS STATED SAID REPORT, PRO FORMA, IS TO HAVE BEEN DONE BY NOW, AND THERE HAS BEEN NO PUBLIC MENTION BY LOVETT OR DPS OF THE RESULT’S OR PUBLISHING OF THE COMPLETED REPORT PUBLICLY BY TDPS AS BOTH PROMISED.  THE REPORT WILL NOT BE MADE PUBLIC UNLESS BY SUB PEONA OF THE PERSONAL INJURY LAWYER OF THE FIFTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL WHO ESCAPED MASSIVE INJURY AND POSSIBLY DEATH BY DRUNKEN DRIVER, EVEN THEN THERE COULD BE A NON DISCLOSURE SETTLEMENT OUT OF COURT. NONETHELESS, THE TIME PERIOD  FOR THE RESULTS OF THE FRAUDULENT EXONERATING BAC TEST HAVE COME AND GONE WITHOUT LOVETT OR DPS MAKING THE MANUFACTURED RESULTS PUBLIC OR EVEN COMPLETING PUBLICLY SAID REPORT.

 

  TDPS COVER UP TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN LOVETT’S  NON DUI CASE,  IS THE UPSIDE DOWN BACKWARDS MIRROR IMAGE OF THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE NO. 2016-215- SJC COURT MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME BY LOVETT AND HIS  TDPSHPO ACCOMPLICES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

UPDATE: IT HAS BEEN OVER  THREE MONTHS AND THERE HAS BEEN NO PUBLIC RECORD RELEASED OF JUDGE LOVETT’S  VOLUNTARY BAC  FROM THE TDPSFC LAB .  HOWEVER, THE YOUNG GIRLS LAWYER- LOVETT NO INSURANCE- BY RIGHT OF DISCOVERY HAVE  RIGHT TO SEE LOVETT’S BAC REPORT AND BY THE MICHAEL MORTON LAW AGAINST THE POLICY OF THE TDPS, HAVE THE TECH WHO DID IT RE DO IT FOR SUSPICION OF FOUL PLAY IF IT IS REPORTED AT OO.OO SINCE LOVETT WAS REPORTED AT THE SCENE BY TWO WITNESSES AS DUI DRIVING RECKLESSLY CAUSING THE CRASH.

 

 UPDATE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT JOHN LOVETT COULD BE DELUSIONAL DUE TO THE EFFECTS OF CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM IMPACTING LOVETT’S MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE PERPETRATION OF AN ANTI -CATHOLIC HATE CRIME AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD. 

 

EASTEX ADVOCATE, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 21, 2017- COUNTY JUDGE SUING COMMISSIONERS: JUDGE ALLEGES ARSON (EXHIBIT 9)

 

THIS NEWS STORY REPORTS  BEHAVIOR OF JOHN LOVETT, PARANOID AND DELUSIONAL, CONCERNED SOLELY WITH HIMSELF AS JUDGE.  WAS THIS ARSON?    CUI BONO?  LOVETT, STILL WITHOUT CAR INSURANCE, NOT CHARGED BY TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  CRONY TDPSHPO  ON MAY 1ST, 2017 AND JAILED FOR DUI II, BAC + .15  A STATE FELONY PUNISHABLE BY ONE YEAR IN PRISON AND SUSPENCION OF LICENSE, IS LIABLE CIVILLY  WITH ONLY A MONETARY SETTLEMENT IN  A CIVIL SUIT FROM THE MAY 1ST ACCIDENT. (THERE HAS BEEN NO TDPSFCL REPORT MADE PUBLIC BY LOVETT OR ANYONE,   NOT SURPRISINGLY, OR INDICTMENT FOR DUI OR DRIVING WITH OUT INSURANCE.

 

PREDOMINATELY ARSON, AS IN MAFIA INSURANCE BURN OUT,  IS PREMISED UPON COLLECTING INSURANCE.  SEEMINGLY DELUSIONAL AND PARANOID, LOVETT, STATES THOUGH PROBABLY  NOT THE COMMISSIONERS,  ONE OF HIS POLITICAL ENEMIES AGAINST HIS  RE ELECTION AS SJCC JUDGE, IS  DEFINITELY THE ARSON. LOVETT STATES FURTHER THIS ACT OF ARSON IS THE RESULT OF THE POLITICAL ATMOSPHERE OF HOSTILITY CREATED BY TRUMP’S ELECTION AND DRAINING THE SWAMP. LOVETT SAID HE DOES NOT WANT TO DRAIN THE SWAMP. THIS NEWS REPORT IS INDICATIVE OF LOVETT’S  SEEMINGLY DELUSIONAL AND  PARANOID THINKING AND  BEHAVIOR ARISING FROM CHRONIC ALCOHOL ABUSE. THE APPELLANT AS DEFENDANT IN SJCC EXPERIENCED DELUSIONAL AND PARANOID BEHAVIOR BY LOVETT  AS ANTI CATHOLIC BIGOTRY BELLIGERENCE   MANIFESTED  BY LOVETT POSSIBLY DUE TO CHRONIC ALCOHOL ABUSE AND PERPETUAL DRUNKENESS IN SJCC HEARINGS  IN ALL OF LOVETT’S  BEHAVIOR IN FRAUDULENTLY AND MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTING THE APPELLANT PRO SE IN CAUSE NO. 2016-215- IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

FOR  VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT,  ALL DEFENDANTS BEFORE JOHN LOVETT IN SJCC ARE EXONERATED OF ALL CHARGES DUE TO LOVETT’S  JUDICIAL MENTAL AND EMOTIONAL  INCOMPETENCY DUE TO THE PARANOID AND DELUSIONAL EFFECTS OF CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM.

 

 

 

 

 RES IPSO, IGITUR,  AS  SAID EXEMPLAR CASE IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT,  APPELLANT  HAS PLAINTIFF STANDING TO REPRESENT  IN SAID CLASS ACTION ANY ONE IN TEXAS FREELY CHOOSING TO ENJOIN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT FALSELY  CONVICTED VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S  DUI/POM SCAM.

 

 MOREOVER, ALL IN TEXAS  ARRESTED BY THE TDPS FOR SUSPECTED  DUI ARE DENIED THE SAME BAC/DUI  “UNUSUAL PROCEDURE” AFFORDED TO SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT ON MAY 1ST, A VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECT CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION BY THE TDPSHP AND TDPS IN  EVERY OTHER DUI PROSECUTION CASE  IN TEXAS.

 

LOVETT,  SUBJECT TO DELUSIONAL AND PARANOID JUDGEMENT AND ACTIONS DUE TO CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM, HAS DENIED, AS SUCH, HUNDREDS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS IN SJC THEIR VITH AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS BY THAT VERY FACT ALONE. THE MAY 19TH  MOCK COURT ORDER IS CULPABLE OF ALLOWING  LOVETT AND HIS ACCOMPLICES, THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, ET AL.  TO CONTINUE DUI/POM  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION NOT ONLY AGAINST THE APPELLANT BUT AGAINST ALL IN TEXAS IN PRINCIPLE OF FACT AND POTENTIALLY IN ACTION.

 

PERPETRATING WIRE FRAUD, ALLEGEDLY DRUNKEN AND APPARENTLY LASCIVIOUS SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVET REGULARLY ORDERS DISMISSAL OF CHARGES AFTER  MOTION TO DISMISS BY   ASS. DA MARK BOEMIO’S EXCLUSIVELY  FOR SCANTILY CLAD YOUNG WOMEN AND GIRLS ALONE IN ALL CASES AT ARRAIGNMERNT  HEARING.   THE APPELLANT OBSERVED SAID ARRAIGNMENT HEARINGS LOVETT PRESIDING THUS EACH TIME. THIS CORRUPT JUDICIAL EXERCISE BY LOVETT IS MORE EVIDENCE OF LOVETT’S SEEMINGLY DELUSIONAL- GRANDIOSE, I  MAKE THE LAW AS JUDGE DELUSIONAL, PARANOID, AND CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR DUE TO CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM. ONCE AGAIN IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE IN THE CASES OF ALL WHO PLEA BEFORE LOVETT AS SJCC JUDGE WHOSE CASE IS NOT DISMISSED BY LOVETT FOR NOT BEING SCANTILY CLAD AS A WOMAN OR GIRL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE USE OF TDPSCF LAB  BAC TEST REPORTS THAT ARE IN ALL DUI CASES IN TEXAS  DENIED RETESTING IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, BY SAID SAME LAB AND BAC TECHNICIAN UNDERSIGNING SAID TDPSFC LAB TEST BAC REPORT FOR SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY DISPUTED IS IN ALL CASES OF DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS BASED ON SAID TDPSFC LAB BAC TEST REPORT  IN VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, GIVES PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT TO ANY ONE IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI BY MANUFACTURED TDPSFC LAB BAC REPORTS  AND SUPPRESSED POTENTIALLY OXONERATING BAC BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE  IN  PERPETRATION OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

 ON JANUARY 9TH, 2016,  SJCC CAUSE NO: 2016 -215-ASS. DA. CHRISTINA WOODS IN DISCOVERY COURT IMMEDIATELY MOVED TO GO DIRECTLY TO TRIAL STATING THE PROSECUTION WITH SAID .231 BAC EVIDENCE ADMISSIBLE WITHOUT RETESTING ORDERED BY LOVETT ( I.E.MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION)  HAD ALL THE STATE REQUIRES TO CONVICT THE APPELLANT OF ENHANCED+.15 CLASS A MISDEMEANOR DUI AND MADE MOTION TO SET A DATE FOR TRIAL.  DENYING, THEREBY, THE  APPELLANT  DUE PROCESS OF A PRE-TRIAL HEARING, THIS THE SJCC ASS. DA  JUSTIFIED BY THE DENIAL OF THE APPELLANT’S  MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS IN THE INTEREST OF CONVICTION ALONE AND NOT JUSTICE,  TO RETEST DNA/BAC EVIDENCE.

 

 

ASS DA WOODS STATEMENT AND MOTION TO GO TO TRIAL SUSTAINED OVER THE OBJECTION OF THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE, THE APPELLANT, CAUSED THE APPELLANT, TO REALIZE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT  A FAIR TRIAL BY JURY WITH SAID MANUFACTURED BAC EVIDENCE ALLOWED BY LOVETT,  PROSECUTED BY AN  UNSCRUPULOUS  SJCC ASS. DA CHRISTINA WOOD AND ACCOMPLICE LIAR MARK BOEMIO, PRESIDED OVER BY ANTI CATHOLIC FREE MASONIC BELLIGERENT DRUNK JUDGE, JOHN LOVETT,  WAS THEREFORE NOT POSSIBLE AND IPSO RES IGITUR, A VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

 

 RES IPS, IGITUR APPELLANT MADE MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION/RECUSAL OF A JUDGE ON FEBR. 23, 2017 BEFORE HIS COMPLETELY UNEXPECTED AND UN PLANNED FOR MOCK TRIAL THAT SAID DAY, LOVETT DISAVOWING SAID MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION AND RECUSA IN RESPONSE.  SAID MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION/RECUSAL OF A JUDGE DEMANDS DUE DILIGENCE, AND PROCESS, AND PEER ADJUDICATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST OF A JUDGE TO BE GRANTED OR DENIED. UNTIL JUSTLY RESOLVED BY DUE PROCESS SATISFYING BOTH JUDGE AND MOTION PLAINTIFF,  FOR OR AGAINST DISQUALIFICATION, ANY RULINGS FROM THE SJCC BENCH IS PRECLUDED IN SAID CAUSE OF JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST UNTIL A JUST RESOLUTION OF SAID MOTION TO PROCEED HENCE FORTH..  JOHN LOVETT, INFORMED IN SAID MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION HE HAD NO CONSTITUIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING TO TRY SAID CAUSE FOR ALL SAID REASONS IN THIS APPEAL,  AS SJCC JUDGE, AND A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST HAVING DENIED APPELLANT HIS MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS DISAVOWED AND DISMISSED OUT OF HAND NEVERTHELESS, SAID MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT. 

 

 

LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, DISAVOWING  OUT OF HAND  SAID MOTION TO DISQUALIFY VIOLATED DUE PROCESS AND THE VITH AMENDMENT. AFTER THE FACT, THE APPELLANT WAS THAT SAME DAY  2/23/17 UNDERESTIMATING LOVETT’S UNSCRUPULOUS AUDACITY IN A PARANOID AND DELUSIONAL PURSUANT OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME VIA SAID MALICIOUS PROSECUTION,  WITHOUT APPELLANT’S  FOREKNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT, TRIED AND CONVICTED IN ABSENTIA  THEREBY IN SJCC  LOVETT WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING AND THROUGH PERJURY AND MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE BY AUBEL, SLAUGHTER, CORLEY  LYING UNDER OATH HOODWINKING  THE JURY ORCHESTRATED BY ASS. DA CHRISTIANA WOOD AND MARK BOEMIO,  FALSELY CONVICTED OF 1ST DUI ENHANCED CAM +.15 SJCC CAUSE NO 2016-215- THE FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT ELEMENT OF SAID 2016 DUI EXTRADITION WARRANT LEADING TO THE APPELLANT’S MARCH 13, 2017 FALSE ARREST AND JAILING IN MCJ DERIVES FROM APPELLANT’S  IN ABSENTIA CONVICTION, IN VOLO CONTENDERE A MISTRIAL 2/23/17.

 

BY SAID FALSE CONVICTION  OF THE APPELLANT IN ABSENTIA, VOLO CONTENDERE A MISTRIAL, JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES CONVICTED THEMSELVES BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME AGAINST THE APPELLANT. THEY FALSELY CONVICTED THE DEFENDANT PRO SE 2/23/17 IN SJCC WITH TDPSCF LAB .231 BAC REPORT MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE  AND SUPPRESSED PIRATED POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BLOOD  SAMPLE EVIDENCE IN VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW, THEY FALSELY CONVICTED THE APPELLANT THAT DAY  BY MUCH PERJURY AND COPIOUS VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 MANIFEST IN NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITES AND DATES,  AND  IN CONTINUOUS FALSE TESTIMONY BY  LYING ARGUMENTS AND BASELESS CHARGES, A MISTRIAL, VOLO CONTENDERE,  NULL AND VOID  OF THE APPELLANT UNJUSTLY TRIED IN ABSENTIA BY AN IPSO FACTO DISQUALIFIED JUDGE,  DRUNK, DELUSIONAL, AND A BELLIGERENT ANTI CATHOLIC BIGOT AND UNJUSTLY SENTENCED IN ABSENTIA  AND JAILED FOR 365 DAYS WITH NO POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION IN THE COMMISSION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.

 

 ON MARCH  19TH, THEREAFTER, THE APPELLANT WAS EXTRADITED FROM MCJ  TO SJCJ  BY SAID DUI 2016/FAILURE TO APPEAR EXTRADITION WARRANT BY LOVETT AND TOLD BY THE OFFICER OF THE SJCC  COMMISSIONED BY LOVETT THE APPELLANT WOULD SERVE 365 DAYS CONTINUOUSLY WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION. THE APPELLANT AT THAT MOMENT LOCKED IN A CELL WAS CONVINCED AT THAT TIME HE WOULD SERVE 365 DAYS SENTENCED BY LOVETT IN ABSENTIA CONTINUOUSLY WITH NO PROBATION. THIS IS CRUEL PUNISHMENT AND MENTAL ANGUISH AND TORTURE.

 

THE APPELLANT  DE FACTO SERVED 33 DAYS OF AB INITO  365 DAY SENTENCE  GIVEN PROBATION BY SAID APRIL 6TH  COVER UP RUSE COMPLETELY SPURIOUS IN EVERY FACT AND DETAIL  PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL APRIL 6TH, 2017-(EXHIBIT).  EVERY DETAIL OF FACT IS FALLACIOUS ON SAID APRIL 6TH, 2017 PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT. EVERY SINGLE DETAIL.  SAID APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT WAS A CYNICAL  RUSE BY LOVETT AND HIS SJCC ACCOMPLICES   TO COVER UP OR OVER THE APRIL 4TH  2016/DECEMBER 24TH 2015  DUI FALSE CONVICTION ON 2/23/2017 CAUSE NUMBER 2016 215- BY WHICH LOVETT AND SJCC ACCOMPLICES IN CONVICTING THE APPELLANT IN A PUBLIC TRIAL CONVICTED THEMSELVES.  SAID COVER UP APRIL 6TH PROBATION RUSE WAS TO COVER UP AND OVER THEIR 2/23/17 PUBLIC CONVICTION OF MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTING THE APPELLANT IN AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.

 

APPELLANT WAS RELEASED UNEXPECTEDLY FROM SJC JAIL ON WEDNESDAY,  MAY 6, 2017 HAVING BEEN DEPRIVED OF HIS LEGAL DEFENSE  PAPERS AT PROCESSING (JUST AS AT MC JAIL PROCESSING A WEEK LATER)   MONDAY MORNING  MAY 4TH AT  SJCJ  WHERE SAID APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER, A COVER UP OF 2/23/17 ACCOUNTED  TIME SERVED FROM MONDAY 8:00 A.M. TO FRIDAY 5.PM WITH WEEKENDS OFF. SAID ALIENATED LEGAL DOCUMENTS PAPERS WERE RETURNED TO APPELLANT UNDER FALSE JAILING AT SJCJ JUST BEFORE HIS UNEXPECTED EARLY RELEASE THAT WEDNESDAY.  A JAILER WITHOUT WRITTEN ORDER OR COMMENT EXCEPT- “THE SJC JAIL HAS NO RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU” RELEASED APPELLANT WITH SAID SJCC PROBATION AND COURT DOCUMENTS IN HAND.   SJC SHERIFF GREG CAPPERS, OR A SUBORDINATE AT SJC JAIL, IT CAN ONLY BE SPECULATED, REALIZED THEIR LIABILITY IN THE SJC JAIL MISUSED BY THE CONTINUING UNLAWFULNESS OF APPELLANT’S JAILING  BY LOVETT’S COVER UP APRIL 6TH ORDER OF PROBATION AND RELEASED THE APPELLANT.

 

 

 

 

 

 FREEING THE APPELLANT FROM FALSE JAILING, AS IS THE CASE WITH THE RUSE MAY 19 MCC AT LAW FIVE COURT ORDER, WAS NOT TRULY DONE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE.  THIS WAS DONE TO EXTRICATE THE SJC JAIL AND DEPUTIES FROM LIABILITY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SUIT FOR UNLAWFUL PARTICIPATION  IN  THE ILLEGAL JAILING OF AN INNOCENT PRIEST IN THE SJC JAIL PURSUANT OF LOVETT’S ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.

 

THIS GESTURE OF SELF INTEREST AND DEFENSE BY THE SJCJ AUTHORITIES , LIKE THE MCC AT LAW FIVE MAY 19TH MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, DID NOT ACHIEVE EQUITABLE REDRESS AND RELIEF IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE IN ANY ACTUAL WAY IN THAT, JUST AS THE MAY 19TH DISMISSAL ORDER,  LOVETT WAS NEVER PERSONALLY CONFRONTED AND PUBLICLY EXPOSED AND CHARGED  BY SJC JAIL AUTHORITIES, NOR CRIMINALLY INDICTED BY CAPPERS FOR  MISUSING THE SJC SHERIFF DEPARTMENT AND SJC JAIL PURSUANT OF  AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, LOVETT WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING AS A SJCC JUDGE AB INITIO.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, AS A RESULT THE APPELLANT WAS FALSELY ARRESTED BY MC SHERIFF DEPUTIES A WEEK AFTER HIS UNEXPECTED RELEASE FROM SJC JAIL  IN WILLIS ON MAY 13TH, 2015 AND AGAIN FALSELY JAIL IN MC JAIL FOR A SECOND TIME (THE FIRST BEING MARCH 13TH, 2017) FOR VIOLATION OF A SECOND STRATEGICALLLY ALTERED  RUSE DEFERRED ADJUDICATION  PROBATION  IN TANDEM WITH A 2/23/ 17 DUI CONVICTION SANCTION OF SUSPENDED LICENSE, I.E. DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID. MUTUALLY EXONERATING CHARGES AS SAID. THIS DEFFERED ADJUDICATION PROBATION CONTRADICTED AND COVERED UP BOTH THE 2/23/17 FALSE DUI CONVICTION OF THE APPELLANT, AND THE FALLACIOUS APRIL 6TH, 2016 PROBATION AND SENTENCING ORDER BY LOVETT UNOFFICALLY ABROGATED BY THE RELEASE OF THE APPELLANT FROM THE SJC JAIL THE WEEK BEFORE.

 

 LOVETT STRATEGICLY  ALTERED  THE FIRST APRIL 6TH  PROBATION COVER UP RUSE TO  A SECOND DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION COVER UP RUSE  WHICH  ENTAILS NO PREVIOUS CONVICTION  FOR DUI 2/23/17.  THE MAY 19TH ORDER, WHICH DELETED AND THEREBY SURPRESSED  SAID AB INITIO  ENHANCING ARREST CHARGE  OF VIOLATION WHILE DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID OF LOVETT’S  ALTERED DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION RUSE COVERING OVER  THE 2/23/17 DUI CONVICTION, FROM THE COURT PUBLIC HEARING, RECORD AND ORDER TO DIMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, THEREBY DID NOT CONFRONT IN A COURT OF LAW LOVETT FOR SAID FELONIOUS RUSE SUBJECTING AS EXHIBITS CORROBORATE THE APPELLANT TO CONTINUED MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, BY DELICT WARRANT AND COURT ORDER ENDING IN FALSE ARREST AND UNJUST JAILING.

 

 

RES IPSO,  IGITUR,THOUGH RELEASED FOR A MOMENT FROM FALSE IMPRISONMENT IN MC JAIL BY RUSE MAY 19TH COURT ORDER IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, , JUST AS THE APPELLANT WAS A WEEK BEFORE HIS ARREST WAS RELEASED FOR A MOMENT FROM SJC JAIL BY SJCD AUTHORITIES ABROGATING PRIVATELY LOVETT’S APRIL 6TH FIRST PROBATION ORDER, LOVETT’S SECOND CONTRADICTORY DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER, NOT PUBLICLY REFUTED IN A COURT OF LAW DUE TO SUPPRESSION FROM PUBLIC HEARING, LIKE LOVETT’S FIRST APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES THEREBY HAS DENIED THE APPELANT ALL JUSTICE IN HIS CAUSE  AND NO EQUITABLE RELIEF GIVEN TO THE APPELLANT BY A COURT OF LAW WITH CONSTITUTIONAL STATE/DISTRICT STANDING IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT, SAID SECOND COVER UP RUSE BY LOVETT EXISTING IN NOMINE SOLO, I.E. IN NAME ONLY, CONTINUES ON THE BOOKS, SO TO SPEAK, SPECIOUSLY   AS  DEFERRED  ADJUDICATION PROBATION DUE TO ITS SUPPRESSION FROM PUBLIC HEARING BY SAID MAY 19TH RUSE MOTION AND COURT ORDER. SAID MAY 19TH RUSE THEREBY FURTHER ABETS  LOVETT’S AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSOCIATES DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION RUSE TO  COVER OVER THE FALSE 2/23/17 2016/2015  DUI CONVICTION RE CAUSE NUMBER 2016-2015- SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT, JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, PRESIDING AS SJCC JUDGE WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING WHERE BY IN FALSELY CONVICTION AND MALICIOUSLY JAILING THE APPELLANT IN COMMISION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME, LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES CONVICTED THEMSELVES. 

 

IN  MALFEASANCE ,  FAILURE TO DO SWORN DUTY, THE SJC SHERIFF DEPARTMENT  BECAUSE OF CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST BEING THEMSELVES IMPLICATED AS ACCOMPLICES AFTER THE FACT IN LOVETT’S HATE CRIME VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND THEREBY PERSONALLY LIABLE IN SUIT,  IN TANDEM WITH THE SJCC, REFUSED TO CONFRONT, AND TO INDICT AND TO ARREST LOVETT AND HIS ACCOMPLICES LEADING TO THE APPELLANT’S  FALSE ARREST ON MAY 13TH BY MC SHERIFF DEPUTIES FOR DRIVING WITH AN INVALID LICENSE ENHANCED BY VIOLATION OF SAID RUSE COVER UP  NON EXISTENT IN NAME ONLY DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDERED BY LOVETT, AS PREVIOUSLY STATED.

 

 

IN TURN AND LIKEWISE, SAID MAY 19TH, 2017  RUSE MOTION TO DISMISS  IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND SUBSEQUENT MC COURT ORDER DID NOT CONFRONT IN A COURT OF LAW,  NOR INDICT JOHN LOVETT’S FELONIOUS MASQUERADING AS A SJC JUDGE, WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING, IN ISSUING SAID 2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR WARRANT,  NOR PUBLICLY AND IN COURT RECORD GIVE HEARING TO AND THEREBY EXPOSE LOVETT’S SPECIOUS  IN NOMINE SOLO, NULL AND VOID, DEFERRED ADJUDICATION  PROBATION  COVER UP RUSE  IN A  MC COURT OF LAW THEREBY DENYING THE APPELLANT IN RELEASING HIM MOMENTARILY FROM FALSE IMPRISONMENT LASTING RELIEF THERE FROM AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR.  APPELLANT CONTINUES TO BE SUBJECT TO WARRANTS PAST AND PRESENT ORDERED  BY THE DELUSIONAL AND  DRUNKEN, BELLIGERENT ANTI CATHOLIC FREE MASON  JOHN LOVETT DERIVING FROM  FIRST APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER MANDATING  HIS ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT HIM FOR 365 DAYSA RUSE TO COVER OVER FEB. 23RD 2017 CONVICTION WITH APRIL 6 PROBATION ORDER DATE OF  “DEC 24TH, 2015” DUI, AND UNLAWFUL MALICIOUS  SENTENCING IN ABSENTIA BY LOVETT PURSUANT OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.  APPELLANT WAS SENTENCED IN ABSENTIA BY LOVETT PERSONA SOL TO TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT- 365 DAYS- FOR 1ST DUI +.15 BAC ENHANCED TO CAM ORDERED BY LOVETT ON APRIL 6TH, 2017.  LOVETT’S  FIRST COVER UP RUSE APRIL 6TH, 2017 PROBATION ORDER CITES FALLACIOUSLY THE INITIAL DUI OFFENSE DATE ON LOVETT’S PROBATION ORDER AS DEC. 24TH, 2015- NOT THE INSTANTER APRIL 4, 2016 DATE, MOCKING THE APPELLANT FROM THE BENCH, A CATHOLIC PRIEST, AS  DRUNK AT ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT ON CHRISTMAS EVE- PURSUANT OF LOVETT’S COMMISSION OF AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME. RES IPSO IGITUR, APPELLANT MAKES SAID MOTION OF COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION FROM JOHN LOVETT AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSOCIATES.

 

 

WITHOUT PRAYED FOR COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION, THE APPELLANT IS THREATENED WITH MULTIPLE WARRANTS ISSUED BY THE SJC PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR FAILURE TO PAY DELINQUENT $100.00 OF  $600 REMAINING FOR PROBATION FEES DERIVING FROM THIS SECOND SPECIOUS  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION RUSE COVER UP AUTHORED BY LOVETT WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING AS PERSONA SOL. (EXHIBIT ) APPELLANT’S ARREST AGAIN FOR SAID DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION VIOLATION WILL RETURN HIM WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF BAIL TO SERVE THE REMAINING  365 DAY SENTENCE IN SJCJ ORDER BY LOVETT ON APRIL 6TH, 2017.

 

 

RES IPSO SEQUITUR, APPELLANT PRO SE PRAYS THE HONORABLE JUDGE BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS FOR EQUITABLE REDRESS AND RELIEF TO GRANT APPELLANTS MOTION OF COURT ORDERED PROTECTION OF APPELLANT FROM CONTINUED FALSE ARREST AND FALSE JAILING UNLAWFULLY WARRANTED BY JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES PURSUANT OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.

 

 

RES IPSO SEQUITOR, APPELLANT PRO SE PRAYS HONORABLE JUDGE TO GRANT IN APPEAL PER COURT ORDER OF MANDAMUS   SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  ALL CHARGES, CONVICTIONS, SENTENCING, AND FINES, PROBATIONS AND EXPUNGMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORD IN CAUSE IN CASE NO. 17-322548 MCC LAW 5, MAY 19TH, 2017 LIGAMENTUM CUM – AN ESTOPPEL OF CAUSE NUMBER 2016-215- .

 

 

SAID  MOTION SOL IS THE ONLY SUMMARY JUDGEMENT RATIFIED BY THE APPELLANT PRO SE. SAID MOTION ALONE IS TRULY JUSTICE AND ACHIEVES EQUITABLE REDRESS AND REAL RELIEF FROM CONTINUED ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME HARASSMENT BY LOVETT BY MALICIOUS WARRANT AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE PROBATION ORDER RUSES.

 

 SAID MOTION DEMANDS EQUITABLE REDRESS OF COMPENSATION FOR TIME OF UNLAWFUL ARREST AND FALSE JAILING, AS JUDGEMENT ONE. AND JUDGEMENT TWO, REMEDY FOR ALL SAID DISTRESS AND GRIEVANCES DERIVING THERE FROM IN ANY MANNER  ENCOMPASSING LOSS OF EMPLOYMENT DUE TO UNJUST ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT AND UNLAWFUL CONFISCATION OF DRIVER’S LICENSE AND IDENTIFICATION, ET ALL SAID HERE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE COURT’S SWORN CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY IS TO UPHOLD THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS AND TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION AGAINST DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. JOHN LOVETT AND ALL ACCOMPLICES IN THE TDPSCD/P REVNUE FRAUD ARE DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE CONSTITUTION  IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S AND ALL IN TEXAS’ CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW PURSUANT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THEIR  DUI/POM VICIOUS REVENUE FRAUD  PIRATING IN SJC AND THROUGHOUT  TEXAS.

 

FOR JUSTICE, REPRESENTS ALL TEXANS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT, WHO HAVE HAD, AS THE APPELLANT CONTINUOUSLY HAS HAD,  GOD GIVEN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATED UNDER COLOR OF LAW, THEIR IVTH. VTH, VITH, VIIITH, XVIIITH, XXIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS VIOLATED BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN PERPETRATION OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD VIA DUI FALSE CONVICTION AND UNLAWFUL CONFISCATION AND SUSPENSION  OF THEIR NON COMMERICIAL DRIVERS’ LICENSE DERIVING FROM UNLAWFUL APPLICATION OF THE 2003 DRIVERS RESPONSIBILTY LAW.

 

APPELLANT, IN HIS EXEMPLAR CASE, HAS SHOWN EVIDENCE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT  IN CONVICTING FALSELY THE APPELANT, LOVETT AND ALL ACCOMPLICES TRULY CONVICTED THEMSELVES IN THEIR OWN COURT OF LAW BY THEIR OWN FALSE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY OF ALL THEIR SAID CRIMES, AND IN TANDEM CONVICTED THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS  OF THEIR DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD

 

  MAKES  CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN LOVETT AND ALL SAID  ACCOMPLICES, AND PRAY THE COURT ISSUE SAID WARRANT FOR LOVETT’S ARREST AND SAID ACCOMPLICES FOR SAID FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS AS THE COURT SEES FIT IN DOING THE COURT’S DUTY TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION AGAINST DOMESTIC ENEMIES. THE APPELLANT ALSO CLAIMS EXEMPLAR CAUSE STANDING AS A PLAINTIFF IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT. 

 

 NON EXISTENT OFFENSE SITES TO FEIGN JUDICIAL STANDING AND CRIMINAL JURISDICTION  AND FALLACIOUS DATES OF OFFENSES ON GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS IN VIOLATION OF FAA 1001 AS A PERVASIVE RUSE IN SJC AND PERHAPS IN OTHER COUNTIES ACROSS TEXAS IS A CRIMINAL ELEMENT IN PERPETRATING THE TDPS COMMISSIONER  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  AND CAN BE ASCERTAINED AS PROSECUTING EVIDENCE   BY   FEDERAL AND OR STATE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION SUB PEONA  COUNTY TDPSHPO  DUI/POM OFFENSE REPORTS.  APPELLANT CALLS FOR THE STATE GRAND JURY TO INVESTIGATE AND TO INDICT IN THESE CRIMINAL MATTERS IF THEIR IS PROBABLY CAUSE OF GUILT.

 

TEXAS DUI/POM CRIMINAL CODE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND MUST BE AMENDED.

 

THE VEILING OF KNOWLEDGE OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS  TO INSURE LEGALLY VINCIBLE IGNORANCE IN PERPETRATING TDPS THE COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD,  100% OF DUI REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS ARE NOT READ THEIR MARANDA RIGHTS IN THE STATE OF TEXAS.  POLICE VEILING AT ARREST THE KNOWLEDGE OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS  ENFORCES FEAR AND BLIND SUBMISSION TO ARREST AND PROSECUTION THROUGH VINCIBLE IGNORANCE SANCTIONED BY THE DUI SCAM  BY AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DUI PROSECUTION TEXAS STATE CODE. NOT KNOWING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS,  DUI ARREST IS THE ONLY CLASS A/B MISDEMEANOR IN WHICH THE SUSPECT, INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY, IS NOT READ HIS MIRANDA RIGHTS AT THE MOMENT OF ARREST.  IGNORANCE, FEAR, SUBMISSION RESULT TO PERPETUATE PASSIVELY THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.   UNCONSTITUTIONAL TEXAS DUI/POM CODE MUST BE MADE CONSTITUTIONAL BY THE READING OF MARANDA RIGHTS  AT TIME OF ARREST FOR DUI/POM.

 

 

 iPSO RES, iGITUR, NOT BEING READ AND  VINCIBLE IGNORANT OF  MARANDA  RIGHTS-,  WITH NO PHYSICAL BAC EVIDENCE, JAILED  SOLELY BY DUI  INSTANTER ARRESTING OFFICER’S SWORN OFFENSE REPORT WHO DID NOT PERSONALLY WITNESS THE SUSPECT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL AT ANY TIME BEFORE OR AFTER HIS ARREST,  (AS IS THE APPELLANT’S CASE ) OF DUI +.08 , SWORN IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 IN 100% OF SAID REPORTS SWORN BY THE INSTANTER TDPS DUI ARREST TROOPER IN THE OF DUI +.08 , SWORN IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 IN 100% OF SAID REPORTS, SWORN IN VIOLATION BY THE DUI ARRESTING OFFICER  DUE TO  A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO PERPETUATE  TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM. REVENUE FRAUD.  MOREOVER,  IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, THE DUI INSTANTER OFFICER DID NOT BEFORE OR AFTER PERSONALLY WITNESS THE APPELLANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL OF HIS VEHICLE BEFORE OR AFTER HIS ARREST.  MANUFACTURED BAC TEST IN UNCONSTITUTIONAL TEXAS  DUI MALICIOUS  PROSECUTION ILLEGALLY AND UNCONSTITUTIONALLY  REPLACES  AND SUPPLANTS THIS  FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENT OF WITNESSES OF THE DEFENDANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL IN  DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE TDPSCD/PRF.  

 

 

IPSO RES. IGITUR ,  ALL DUI SUSPECTS-INOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY- , WITH NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE BAC OR OTHER,   IGNORANT OF THEIR IV, V, VI, WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, RIGHTS,  SOLEY ON THE TESTIMONY OF THE INSTANTER OFFICER WHO DID NOT IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE PERSONALLY WITNESS THE APPELLANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL AT ANY TIME BEFORE OR AFTER THE APPELLANT’S  DUI ARREST  ARE JAILED FOR THREE DAYS OR MORE (THE APPELLANT WAS  MALICIOUSLY IN UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT JAILED IN SJC JAIL FOR FOUR DAYS IN SOLITARY CONFINEMENT FOR FOR VOICING HIS OBJECTIONS TO THE VIOLATION OF HIS CIVIL AND GENEVA RIGHTS AND BAC REFUSAL DURING WHICH TIME HIS SISTER DIED WITH CANCER AND HIS RESCUE DOGS WERE SHOT BY A MALICIOUS NEIGHBOR FOR TRESS PASSING).

 

 

FOR APPROXIMATELY 30 DAYS BEFORE BEING CHARGED, ON BAIL, THERE IS NO PUBLIC RECORD ACCESSIBLE TO THE DUI DEFENDANT OF BAC THE NIGHT OF ARREST AND JAILING FOR DUI.  EVERY BAC NEVER DOES, BUT WHAT IF THE BAC CAME BACK BELOW .O8  THE DEFENDANT’S TDPS  BAC REPORT IS SENT TO THE STATE PROSECUTION’S LOCAL DA OFFICE EXCLUSIVELY AND ONLY CAN ONLY BE ASCERTAINED BEFORE TRIAL BY  DISCOVERY IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT, THE EXONERATING -.O8 BAC REPORT IS WITH HELD BY THE STATE PROSECUTION AFTER JAILING AND ON BAIL FOR APPROXIMATELY THIRTY DAYS MAKING BAIL EXCESSIVE IN VIOLATION OF THE VII AMENDMENT.    TO PERPETUATE THE TDPSCD/PRF  100% TDPS  DUI INSTANTERS ARE RETROACTIVELY JUSTIFIED BY  MANUFACTURED  + .08 BAC  TDPSCF LAB REPORTS WITH NO REFUSAL IN 100% OF DUI ARRESTS AND JAILING.  

 

 

TEXAS ASS. DA BRANDISH LIKE CLUBS SAID MANUFACTURED BAC REPORTS TO THREATEN AND  TO BULLY  TDPSC DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS  WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF LEGAL COUNSEL  PRESENT TO PLEA GUILTY FOR A LITE SENTENCE,  SAID MANUFACTURED BAC TEST REPORTS ALWAYS + .08  AND IN OVER 90% OF CASES  + .2  TO ENHANCE OFFENSE TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR WITH NO POSSIBILITY OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION. ARE  SAID MANUFACTURED BAC REPORTS ARE SENT FROM THE NOTORIOUSLY CORRUPT EVIDENCE TAMPERING TDPSCFL  AND ARE SELF ASSURED TO BE  “99.7 ‘CONFIDENCE LEVEL’,” A TAUTOLOGY FOR “ACCURACY LEVEL.”  THE TRUTH IS NO ONE KNOWS HOW ACCURATE THE BAC TEST IS.  IPSO RES, IGITUR , THE TDPSCF LAB SELF ASSURED “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL”  IS   NON SCIENTIFIC DISTORTION TO INTIMIDATE DUI/POM FRAUD VICTIMS IN FEAR AND IGNORANCE OF THE BAC TEST TO UNCONSTITUTIONALLY FORFEIT THE VI AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL WITH A JURY WITH NO MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE I.E.THE SPECIOUS TDPS BAC REPORTS AND PLEA “BARGAIN”  GUILTY.  THE LITE SENTENCE IS SIMPLY TO INDUCT THEM INTO THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SYSTEM WITH A MINIMUM OF EFFORT AND RESISTANCE.

 

IF ONE AND A MILLION, LIKE THE APPELLANT, KNOWING HIS CONSTITUTIONAL AND GENEVA RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED BY THE VIOLENT SEIZING OF HIS BLOOD AFTER REFUSAL, UNDERSTANDING THE FUNDAMENTALS OF BAC- FOR A MALE ONE DRINK PER HOUR IS ELIMINATED BY THE LIVER AND WHAT .231 BAC INDICATORS ARE,  REFUSES TO PLEA BARGAIN GUILTY AND REJECTING THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD CO CONSPIRATOR COMPROMISED  $15,000 SHAM DUI LAWYER TO BE ACQUITTED EVEN IF THE APPELLANT WAS AT .231,   THE APPELLANT WAS NOT  AT BAC. 231 ACCORDING TO THE TDPS DUI OFFENSE REPORT APRIL 4TH, 2016,    PLEADS NOT GUILTY AS DEFENDANT PRO SE, THEN JUDGES SUCH AS  JOHN LOVETT ATTEMPT TO TERRORIZE THE DEFENDANT PRO SE  NOT TO GO TO TRAIL AS SUCH WITH  ONE YEAR IN JAIL AND A TEN THOUSAND DOLLAR FINE  FOR 1STDUI IF THEY DO NOT PLEA BARGAIN GUILTY.

 

JUDGES SUCH AS JOHN LOVETT, ERNEST MCCLENDON, WAYNE MACK IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ARE A LEGACY MONSTROUSLY  STILL ANIMATED BY THE  CONSTITUTIONALLY  REPEALED 18TH AMENDMENT,  AND SO CALLED  “PROHIBITION” IN THE MODERN  CONTEXT OF DRINKING AND DRIVING DUI.  EMBOLDENED BY THE SELF JUSTIFICATION OF HIGHWAY ELECTRIC BILLBOARD MADD SLOGANS ‘DRINK, DRIVE, GO TO JAIL,’  “NO REFUSAL'”,  PLEA BARGAINING GUILTY, DRACONIUM JAIL TIME AND CRUSHING FINES  FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUGS, THE RISE OF THE PENAL, POLICE STATE IN DENIAL OF THE 21ST AMENDMENT REPEAL OF THE 18TH  BY THE TDPSC DUI/POM  REVENUE FRAUD IS A MONEY HUNGRY  DISAVOWAL BY THE STATE OF TEXAS OF THE US CONSTITUTION AND BETRAYAL OF THEIR OATH TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE TEXANS RIGHTS AND WELL BEING AGAINST DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE CONSTITUTION LIKE SAID JUDGES, THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD AND THE FERTITA/DINARDO/FRANCIS/ HELU SINALOA FEDERATION CARTEL.

 

THE TDPSCD/P  REVENUE FRAUD SINE QUA NON  CANNOT IN ANY CASE AND DOES NOT ALLOW EVEN AFTER A SIGNED BAC REFUSAL,  BLOOD NOT TO BE DRAWN UNDER DURESS FOR THE MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED TDPSCF LAB  BAC UNDERSIGNED REPORTS  IN 100% OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF DUI/POM IN TEXAS.  ALLOWING THE BLOOD NOT TO BE SEIZED IN 100% OF CASES AFTER INSTANTER ISSUED OR ALLOWING JUST ONE TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT TO BE RETESTED BY THE SAME TDPS LAB AND BAC TECHNICIAN WHO UNDERSIGNED THE REPORT WOULD  EXPOSE AND INDICT THE TDPSCD/P AS ORGANIZED CRIME GOVERNMENT POLICE CORRUPTION VIOLATING TEXANS CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW FOR 2.5 BILLION A YEAR, WHILE SERVING TO SHIELD SAID ORGANIZED CRIME HUMAN, CHILD SEX SLAVE, DRUG, AND ARMS TRAFFICKING ON THE I-10, -I-59/69.   IF EVEN ONE TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORT CAME BACK FROM THE TDPS LAB BELOW .O8. SO FAR THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED , AND IF IT DID HAPPEN IN JOHN LOVETT’S CASE, LOVETT  HAS DECLINED IN COLLUSION WITH TDPS AFTER THREE MONTHS TO SAY PUBLICLY   AS LOVETT PUBLICLY SAID HE  WOULD IN SAID  MAY 7TH, SAN JACINTO TIMES ARTICLE.

 

OVER 90%  BAC TESTS COME BACK  AFTER APRX. THIRTY DAYS AT BAC .2. NOT ONE HAS EVER COME BACK BELOW BAC .15 FROM THE LAB. THE REASON FOR THE NONE BELOW .O8 IS  A UNIVERSAL VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW BY THE TDPS IN THAT  THE TDPSCFL DOES NOT ALLOW RETESTING BY THE SAME TDPS BAC TECHNICIAN IN SAID TDPSFC LAB HARRIS COUNTY OR ANY TDPS TECHICIAN OF ANY DISPUTED FOR VALIDITY  BAC  BLOOD SAMPLES. EVEN WHEN REQUESTED BY THE APPELLANT AND THE APPELLANT COURT ORDER TO RETEST APPELLANT’S BAC  (EXHIBIT 12) DENIED IN COURT BY LOVETT ON JANUARY 9TH, 2017.  THERE IS UNIVERSAL VIOLATION OF THE 2015 MICHAEL MORTON LAW  DENYING IN EVERY DUI CASE IN TEXAS  BAC REPORT VALIDATION THROUGH RETESTING BY SAID REPORT LAB AND TECHNICIAN, SINE QUA NON,  IN ORDER TO PERPETUATE   TDPSCD/P  REVENUE FRAUD,

 

 

 

 A SIGNIFICANT REVENUE STREAM IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD DERIVING FROM THE PENAL STATE ARE COUNTY JAILS LIKE THE SJC JAIL- BUILT BY SHERIFF HUMPY PARKER DURING HIS THREE DECADE LONG REIGN OF TERROR AND MURDER IN SJC.  THE SAME SJC COURT THAT ENABLED HUMPY, ENABLED JOHN LOVETT  TO FALSELY JAIL THE APPELLANT  IN SAID FACILITY FOR TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT OF 180 DAYS WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION, AND LOVETT BY DELICT 2016 DUI FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT APRIL 6TH WARRANT AND SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION TO CONTINUE TO  JAIL APPELLANT PRO SE IN THE SJC OR MC JAILS FACILITY. SUCH FALSE JAILING IN THE SCHEME OF TDPSCD/P  IS AN ILL GOTTEN  SOURCE OF  COUNTY REVENUE  FROM TEXAS AND US TAX PAYERS ROOTED IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 AMERICAN CITIZENS AND TEXANS ARE CAUGHT UP IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUDWEB OF FALSE DUI AND POM ARREST  AND ARE FALSELY JAILED AT TAX PAYERS COST, I.E. THEIR OWN COST AS TAX PAYERS,  WITH  NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE (BAC) BEYOND SPURIOUS TESTIMONY BY  DUI INSTANTER ARRESTING OFFICERS WITH A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE CONTEXT OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.   OUNCE AN INSTANTER IS ISSUED,  DUI  CONVICTION BY PLEADING GUILTY IN BARGAINING MUST HAPPENED IN 99% OF CASES.  THE ONLY EXCEPTION IS  DRUNK DRIVERS WITH THE MONEY WHO ARE GUILTY OF DUI AND CAUSED COLLISIONS GOTTEN OFF EVERY TIME BY  DON’T KILL THE GOLDEN GOOSE DUI AMBULANCE CHASER LAWYERS FOR $15,000 DOLLAR OR MORE FEES.

 

GUILTY BY BEING CHARGED IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL  AND IS GENERATED BY CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT OF ALL LEVELS ADDICTED AND ABSORBED BY THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  EVEN IF THE DUI/FRAUD VICTIM  IS INNOCENT AND THE STATE HAS NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE THE SUSPECT HAS ANY ALCOHOL IN HIS BLOOD AT THE TIME OF ARREST FOR DUI,  AS IS EVIDENT IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE, .BAC BLOOD SAMPLES MUST BE TAKEN IN EVERY CASE THAT AN INSTANTER IS ISSUED. THE BAC BLOOD SAMPLES ARE SEIZED UNDER DURESS IN  %100 OF THE CASES WHEN AN INSTANTER IS ISSUED, EITHER ASSUMED VOLUNTARILY (IF THE SUSPECT DOES NOT VERBALLY REFUSE, THEIR CONSENT IS ASSUMED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT – AGAIN DUI DETAINEES ARE NOT READ THEIR MARANDA RIGHTS AND ARE INVINCIBLE IGNORANT OF THEIR V AND VTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO REFUSAL OF A TDPS BAC TEST AND BLOOD DRAW- SO THIS ASSUMPTION BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OF BAC CONSENT BY THE DUI ARREST SUBJECT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL DUE TO INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE CAUSED BY NOT BEING READ MIRANDA RIGHTS AND FALLACIOUS “NO REFUSAL WEEK END”  ELECTRONIC BILL BOARDS.   

 

BAC WRITTEN REFUSAL IS PUNISHABLE BY 180 DAY CONFISCATION OF STANDARD DRIVERS LICENSE,  AND BY LAW A 365 DAY SUSPENSION OF CDL. WHENEVER ONE SIGNS THE WRITTEN REFUSAL , AS APPELLANT DID ,  BLOOD IS NONETHELESS VIOLENTLY SEIZED  IN SPITE OF SIGNED REFUSAL IN ALL  DUI CASES SINE QUA NONE TO PERPETUATE THE TDPSCDP REVENUE SCAM.   BLOOD MUST BE DRAWN SINE QUA NON  AS PROP FOR A SPECIOUS BAC TEST REPORT IN THE OVER 90% OF CASES  AT BAC + .2,  AT A SCIENTIFICALLY INVALIDATED  SELF CERTIFYING “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL”  CONVICTING WITH BAC MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE  %  99  OF  TDPSC REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS  OF DUI BY PLEA BARGAINING GUILTY. 

 

 

VIOLATION OF RICO: THE DUI/POM FRAUD IS ORGANIZED CRIME RACKET ABSORBING AND MORALLY BLINDING TEXAS GOVERNMENT AND POLICE IN CORRUPTION, ADDICTNG ALL TO MONEY AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL POWER.

 

GOVERNOR ABBOTT, AS GOVERNOR, AND BEFORE ATTORNEY GENERAL OVERSEEING THE TDPSCD/P BY APPOINTING AS TEXAS GOVERNOR THE FIVE TDPS COMMISSIONERS,  HAS NEVER, IN CONJUNCTION WITH, OR IN OVERSEEING  ANY LEVEL OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, TDPS, SHERIFF, OR CITY POLICE  MADE AN ARREST AND CONVICTION OF A MEMBER OF THE TILMAN FERTITA/ CARDINAL DINARDO/FRANCIS/ HELU SINALOA FEDERATION CARTEL FOR BY SEMI DRUG ON THE I-10, I-59/69  TRAFFICKING, ARMS DEALING, BUT MOST ESPECIALLY  FOR  HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING IN THE STATE OF TEXAS. THE MURDER OF JAIME ZAPATA, AND OUTCOME OF THE BUSH/BARAK OPERATION FAST AND FURIOUS IN TEXAS WAS NEVER INVESTIGATED. HOUSTON/GALVESTON “FREE STATE” LEGACY FERTITA SYNDICATE HAS SINCE THE BEGINNING OF PROHIBITION IN 1919 ENCOMPASSED AND MORALLY SILENCED  THE  ARCHBISHOP OF OF ARCHDIOCESE OF Galveston/Houston VIA “VELVET GLOVE” TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT BRIBERY OF THE HUNDRED CLUB AND RACKET BASED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO SHIELD IN ADDITION TO THE TDPSCD/P SYNICATE AND NOW SFCARTEL CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING ON  THE I 10 AND I 59 SINCE THE THIRTIES.  HOUSTON IS THE WORLDS GREATEST HUB OF CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING VIA THESE ROUTES.  A RECENT UT  STUDY PLACES THE NUMBER OF SLAVES IN TEXAS AT 300,000, OF WHOM 78,000 OF CHILDREN ARE TRAFFICKED  BY ORGANIZED CRIME OLIGARCHS SUCH AS FERTITA, BUSH/CLINTON/BARAK/HELU SFCARTEL  AS CHILD SEX SLAVES IN SEMIS ENDLESSLY MOVE ALONG THE I-10, I-59/69.  78 % OF THESE CHILDREN IF AMERICAN CITIZENS DISAPPEAR INTO CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING VIA THE HELLISH TEXAS DEPARTMENT CHILD PROTECTION AGENCY AND FOSTER HOME PROGRAM. PERRY AS TEXAS GOVERNOR, AND NOW ABBOTT AS GOVERNOR ARE BEING SUIT BY A CHILDREN’S RIGHT NGO OVER THE UNCONSCIONABLE  ABUSES OF THE  TEXAS STATE CPA FOSTER HOME HELL ON EARTH (EXHIBIT 13)

 

THERE IS NO NATIONAL OR STATE  GOVERNMENT AGENCY DEDICATED TO LOCATING MISSING PERSONS, ESPECIALLY CHILDREN TRAFFICKED AS SEX SLAVES.  THE TDPS  TRADITIONALLY PUTS THE NUMBER AT 25,000 PER YEAR OF CHILDREN WHO “DISAPPEAR”  INTO CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING IN TEXAS BUT THE RECENT UT REPORT SHOWS THIS IS A MINIMIZING UNDERSTATEMENT. THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  ACTING AS AN INVISIBLE MAKING SHIELD HAS WITH 100% EFFICIENCY INSURED THESE 78 THOUSAND CHILDREN PLUS TRAFFICKED  IN TEXAS AS SEX SLAVES RELENTLESSLY ALONG THE I’10, I-59,69 ARE NOT INVESTIGATED, DISCOVERED AND RESCUED BEFORE THEY ARE ROUTINELY  MURDERED WHEN THEY HAVE LOST THEIR VALUE FOR TRAFFICKERS.

 

ABBOTT JUST AS PERRY DURING  PERRY’S 2012 FAILED PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN RECEIVED MILLIONS IN “CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS”  BUNDLED BY TILMAN FERTITA’S SYNDICATE MEMBERS  FRONTED BY THE HOUSTON COLAITION FOR PROGRESS.  ABBOTT’S CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION HEAD BEFORE HER FIERY ABDUCTION IN 2011, BY A RIVAL NEW ORLEANS  ORGANIZE CRIME CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKER SYNDICATE HISTORICALLY BASED IN NEW ORLEANS,  WAS JESSICA FERTITA, A CLOSE RELATIVE OF TILMAN FERTITA. JESSICA, THE HEIR OF THE FETTITA SYNDICATE, BESIDES ACTING AS A LEGISLATIVE AID IN A FURTIVE ATTEMPT BY TILMAN FERTITA, WHO OWNS THE GOLDEN NUGGET CASINO CHAIN,  TO LEGALIZE GAMBLING IN TEXAS BY STATE LEGISLATURE,  fERTTITA TILMAN IS  ENTRUSTED BY PERRY TO OVERSEE THE LEGAL TEXAS LOTTO THROUGH  LIEUTENANTS WHILE HISTORICALLY OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY AN ILLEGAL SYNDICATE  OF BLACKED OUT WINDOW  GAMBLING VENUES ALONG THE 59, 10, AND 209 CORRIDOR. ALL SAID VENUES IN WALLER COUNTY HAVE BEEN SHUT DOWN IN 2009 BY WALLER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ELIS MATTHIS, TO WHOM, ALONG WITH THE FBI GULF COAST ORGANIZED CRIME TASK FORCE, THE APPELLANT SUPPLIED INFORMATION ON JOE KUCIEMBE A FERTITTA SYNDICATE  LOCAL BOSS OPERATING OUT OF THE HEMPSTEAD COLUMBUS CLUB AS A FRONT TRACKING DRUGS, CHILDREN, BUT ESPECIALLY ROMANIAN AND POLISH AK 47’S TO THE MEXICAN CARTEL’S FROM THE PORT OF HOUSTON ALONG THE 1-10.  tHE APPELLANT DISCOVERED THE HEMPSTEAD COLUMBUS CLUB WAS A GUN RUNNING FRONT OF THE TILMAN FERTITA/SFC WHILE PASTORAL ADMINISTRATOR OF ST. CATHERINE DREXEL, HEMPSTEAD TEXAS. THE HUNDREDS OF SYNDICATE SEMI’S STAGING AT THREE IN THE MORNING AT THE 12,000 SQUARE FOOT COLUMBUS CLUB WITH ARMS FROM THE PORT OF HOUSTON, THE APPELLANT IS TOLD BY LOCALS HAS BEEN DORMANT AND SEMI’S NO LONG APPEAR IN THE EARLY MORNING AT THE HEMPSTEAD COLUMBUS CLUB.

 

IN WALLER COUNTY, AND SEEMINGLY ALONG THE I-10 AND 1-59, THE FERTITA BLACK WINDOW ILLEGAL GAMBLING VENUE WHERE DRUGS AND PROSTITUTION WERE AVAILABLE, AS WELL AS RESTAURANT VENUES IN THE TRADITION OF THE FREE STATE GALVESTON BALI ROOM HAVE CLOSED DUE TO THE BREAK UP OF THE SFC AND TAKE OVER BY NEW ORLEANS MAFIA BOSS POST KATRINA, 2011.  THE TILAMN FERTITA SYNDICATE BANKRUPTED AND FACING EXTINCTION SINCE 2011 DUE TO THE DISINTEGRATION OF THE SFC, DIVORCED FROM THE FR. MACIEL LEGIONARY OF CHRIST VATICAN BANK MONEY LAUNDERING ACCOUNT  IN 2008, AND HAVING THEIR OPERATIONS CURTAILED BY THE FED. FOR CARLOS SLIM HELU’S 2012 SUPPORT OF ASSAD IN SYRIA TO SAVE HELU’S MARONITE CATHOLIC RELATIVES FROM GENOCIDE BY ISRAEL PROXY ARMY ISIS-  ISIS IT SELF NOW DEFUNCT-SFC COCAINE AND METH TRAFFICKING HAS BEEN SUPPLANTED BY TEL AVI BASED CIA/PENTAGON HEROIN TRAFFICKING IN THE US FROM AFGHANISTAN MONEY LAUNDERED NOT THROUGH THE ROTHSCHILD CONTROLLED  VATICAN BANK, BUT CHASE/CITI BANK.  PRESIDENT TRUMP’S RECENT REFUSAL TO SEND 4,000 ADDITIONAL TROOPS TO AFGHANISTAN AND DESIRE TO REASSESS THE STATUS QUO IN AFGHANISTAN  (IF TRUMP IS NOT ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATED BY THE ROTHSCHILD’S LIKE FIVE PRESIDENTS BEFORE HIM, WILL HAVE A DESICCATING EFFECT ON TEL AVI BASED ORGANIZED CRIME GOVERNMENT BACKED TRAFFICKING  MONOPOLY IN THE US.  THE FREEDOM OF BOLIVIA, A MAIN SOURCE OF COCAINE FOR THE SFC, FROM ROTHSCHILD  INDEBTEDNESS VIA THE IMF AND WORLD BANK PRECLUDES FURTHER CONTROL OF THE BUSH/CLINTON/HELU SFC OF BOLIVIA COCAINE AS WELL AS CIA/MOSSAD.

 

UNTIL JESSICA FERTITA’S DISAPPEARANCE IN 2011,  JESSICA WAS  CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION BUNDLER FOR “TEXANS FOR ABBOTT” GREGG ABBOTT’S  CAMPAIGN ORGANIZATION FOR TAG AND THEN TEXAS GOVEERNOR.  JESSICA FERTITA, THE FLOWER OF THE SYNDICATE AND FUTURE HEAD, OVER SAW TILMAN’S SYNDICATE “BARELY LEGAL” CHILD SEX SLAVE INTERNET PORN RACKET MONEY LAUNDERED THROUGH BIG FIVE BANK CREDIT CARDS.  VIEWERS WERE FURTHER SHOOK DOWN IN BLACKMAIL  PAY TO PLAY SURCHARGES BY INTERNET THUGS POSING AS FBI AGENTS IN EXCHANGE FOR  NOT BEING PROSECUTED FOR INTERNET CHILD PORN.

 

AS GOVERNOR, ABBOTT AS WAS  PERRY, AND CARDINAL DANIEL DINARDO OF GALVESTON/HOUSTON AND AS  PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS VIA CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES, CATHOLIC CHARITIES, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSION ON REFUGEES  ARE SYNDICATED ASSOCIATES OF TILMAN’S HUMAN (REFUGEE) AND CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING SYNDICATE.  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IS A CENTRAL CRIMINAL  ELEMENT OF THE TILMAN/ ABBOTT/CARDINAL DANIEL DINARDO SYNDICATE SHIELDING THROUGH TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ABSORPTION OF COURT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT RESOURCES, THAT IN TURN SHIELDS NOT ONLY DRUG AND ARM I 10 AND I 59 SEMI SHIPMENTS ORGANIZED CRIME TRAFFICKING, SHIELDED BY TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ABSORPTION OF SAID LAW ENFORCEMENT RESOURCES FROM INVESTIGATION, ARREST, AND CONVICTION, BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY HUMAN  AND CHILD SEX SLAVING SEMI TRAFFICKING BY SAID CARTELS AND SYNDICATES.  MILITARY TECHNOLOGY READILY EXISTS TO PLACE MOBILE INFRARED HEAT SENSORS ON DRONES  TO DETECT HUMANS BEING TRAFFICKED IN SEMIS VIA THE I 10 AND I 59. THIS POSSIBLE CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING DETECTION SCENARIO IS PURPOSELY NOT EVEN CONSIDERED AND NOT DONE BY GOVERNOR ABBOTT IN A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST AS SHOWN.

 

GOVERNOR ABBOT IN FACT, IN SPITE OF PUBLIC BLUSTER TO THE CONTRARY, NOT SECURED THE BORDERS OF TEXAS FROM AN INFLUX OF CHILD SEX SLAVE SFC ASSOCIATED FROM CENTRAL AMERICA IN 2011, NOR REFUGEES CLAIMED TO BE FROM  SYRIA (THE FBI CAN NOT KNOW THE ORIGIN OF THESE SO CALLED REFUGEES)  TRAFFICKED BY  CARDINAL DINARDO VIA CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES INTERNATIONAL AND CATHOLIC CHARITIES LOCALLY. AS CARDINAL ARCHBISHOP OF GALVESTON HOUSTON DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OPERATED IN CONJUNCTION WITH HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSION FOR REFUGEES ON THE MEXICAN BORDER AND IN EUROPE SUPPORTED BY FRANCIS, NOW IN PUBLIC CONTRADICTION OF PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP’S WALL POLICY.

 

THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS WITH CARDINAL DINARDO AS HEAD HAS RECEIVED BILLIONS OF FEDERAL TAX PAYER DOLLARS VIA CRS AND CC TO TRAFFIC “VICTIMS” OF CHILD SEX SLAVERY AND REFUGEES (PREDOMINATELY MILITARY AGE MEN, THE WOMAN AND CHILDREN BEING SHEARED OFF INTO SLAVERY DURING TRAFFICKING BY THE UN, CRS).  AS SUCH, ABBOTT HAS NOT CONFRONTED DINARDO ON CRS CC TRAFFICKING NOT CLOSED OPEN BORDERS.  THIS ELEMENT OF THE FERTITA/HELU SFC SYNDICATE OF HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING OPERATION HAS SINCE THE ELECTION OF DONALD TRUMP, LIKE THE SO CALLED NWO, FALLEN INTO DISREPAIR. THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD PROTECTIVE SHIELD A SKELETON OF SIGNIFICANTLY DEFUNCT TILMAN/SF CARTEL TRAFFICKING OPERATIONS REMAINS IN FULL FORCE UNABATED IN SPITE OF ALL THIS.  DINARDO WITH ABBOTT OF GOVERNOR IS NONETHELESS ABLE TO TRAFFIC REFUGEES ALLEGEDLY FLEEING SYRIA, NONE OF WHOM ARE MEN, WOMAN, AND CHILDREN MARONITE CATHOLICS, IN TEXAS AND BE PAID VIA US TAX DOLLARS AND UN EURO’S FOR CRS AND CC LOGISTICS RENDERED. DINARDO’S TRAFFICKING HAS SERVED NO CATHOLICS IN SYRIA FROM SUFFERING GENOCIDE BY THE NOW DEFUNCT ISIS FOR THE PAST FIVE YEARS OF CIA/MOSSAD PROXY WAR IN SYRIA AGAINST PRESIDENT ASSAD .  BOTH CARDINAL DINARDO AND FRANCIS, VOCAL CRITICS OF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S HAVE SOVEREIGN BORDERS POLICIES IN REGARD TO MEXICO AND REFUGEES FROM ISRAELI SELECT COUNTRIES LIKE IRAN- EXCLUSIVE OF ISIS PROXY ARMY- 9/11 FUNDING SAUDI WHILE FINANCIALLY PROFITING FROM SAID TRAFFICKING AND SILENT ABOUT SAUDI/ISRAEL PROXY ARMY SLAUGHTER OF CATHOLICS IN SYRIA.

 

AS GOVERNOR,  ABBOTT APPOINTS THE FIVE NON PAID COMMISSIONERS OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BOARD WHO  IN THE NAME OF “CHARITY”  DEFRAUD TEXANS OUT OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, VIOLATING UNDER COLOR OF LAW  THEIR RIGHTS AND HUMAN DIGNITY  VIA THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS ‘ DUI/POM FRAUD TDPSC/D/P REVENUE FRAUD.  FIRST AND FORE MOST AS HEAD AMONG THE FIVE COMMISSIONERS BOARD  IS JOE THE CHIMP,  CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF  TILMAN’S HUNDRED CLUB.   ABBOTT IS  DEPENDENT ON THE FERTITA SYNDICATE FOR CAMPAIGN  BUNDLING CONTRIBUTIONS  AND DINARDO, A LONG TIME PITTSBURGH  ZAPPALA MAFIA FAMILY ASSOCIATE TO WHO DINARDO OWES HIS ELEVATION TO ARCHBISHOP OF GALVESTON HOUSTON FOR CAMPAIGN  ENDORSEMENT  FOR GOVERNOR AS “PRO LIFE” IN TANDEM  WITH  “PRO LIFE ABORTION PROFITEER” HUCKSTER ELIZABETH GRAHAM’S REVENUE FRAUD TEXAS RIGHT FOR LIFE TO DELIVER THE “PRO LIFE VOTE.” TO ENDORSE ABBOTT  TURNING  A BLIND EYE TO HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING ENSLAVED  FROM A HELLISH TEXAS CPA AND FOSTER HOME SYSTEM IS AN OXYMORON TO SAY THE LEAST, AND A SINE QUA IN SUPERFICIALLY SHIELDING BY THE CONSERVATIVE COVETED PRO LIFE MEDALLION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ROOTED IN CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING ENSLAVING CHILDREN PRIMARILY PIRATED FROM TEXAS  CPA AND FOSTER CARE PROGRAM

 

IN RETURN FOR FERTITA CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS INCLUSIVE OF CARDINAL DINARDO/ELIZABETH GRAHAM TEXAS RIGHT TO LIFE “PRO LIFE” TO BE ELECTED   TEXAS GOVERNOR, OR ATTORNEY GENERAL, ABBOTT (OR ANYBODY REALLY) HAS NEVER ON ANY LEVEL AS GOVERNOR OR ATTORNEY GENERAL OVERSCENE AN ARREST AND CONVICTION FOR CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING, DRUGS, GUN RUNNING, ET AL BY SEMI ALONG THE i-10, I-59/69 THAT HAS EXPOSED AND IMPACTED IN ANY way THE TILMAN FERTITA SYNDICATE AND THE BUSH/CLINTON/ OBAMA/HELU SFC TRAFFICKING OPERATIONS. THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD’S ARRESTING AND CONVICTION MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN TEXAS SINCE 2003 LIKEWISE HAS NOT BY DESIGN EXPOSED OR IMPACTED IN ANY MANNER SAID TRAFFICKING SYNDICATES IN ANY MANNER.

 

PRESIDENT TRUMP AND ATTORNEY GENERAL SESSIONS BORDER ENFORCEMENT AND SO CALLED “PEDOPHILE” BUSTS ARE THE FIRST AND ONLY INSTANCES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE US ON ANY LEVEL INVESTIGATING, DISCOVERING, AND ARRESTING CHILD SEX SLAVE PARTICIPANTS (CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IS A CENTRAL ELEMENT REVENUE STREAM IN CHILD SEX SALVE TRAFFICKING). MOREOVER, THE CORRECT TERM IN THIS CONTEXT IS NOT “PEDOPHILE” BUT “PEDERAST.”  “PEDOPHILES” BY CLINICAL DEFINITION RAPE AND MOLEST THEIR OWN BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN. ALL PEDOPHILES ARE PEDERASTS, BUT % 97 OF PEDERASTS ARE NOT PEDOPHILES. FR. MACIEL DEGOLADO, CRIMINAL MASTERMIND AND  INVENTOR OF THE SINALOA FEDERATION CARTEL IN TANDEM WITH THE BUSHES/CLINTONS/ HELU AND GARZA FAMILIES, INVENTED INTERNATIONAL CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING OF AND FOR THE POOR AND POLITICALLY DISENFRANCHISED VIA CHILDREN FOR SALE IN CANTINAS ACROSS THE UNITED SATES TRAFFICKED BY SEMI ALONG THE I-10 AND I-59/69. FATHER MACIAL IS AN INFAMOUS EXAMPLE OF A PEDERAST WHO IS A TRUE PEDOPHILE. LEADING TO HIS REMOVAL BY THEN POPE BENEDICT IN 2006, AS HEAD AND INVENTOR OF THE SFC MONEY LAUNDERING ROTHSCHILD VATICAN BANK FRONT, THE LEGIONARIES OF CHRIST, THE SECULAR MEXICAN PRESS EXPOSED FATHER MACIEL, A CATHOLIC PRIEST, HAD “FATHERED” SEVERAL BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN BY TWO DIFFERENT MOTHERS.  MACIEL A TRUE PEDOPHILE, HAD MOLESTED AND RAPED HIS SONS, ACCORDING TO MACIEL’S ADULT CHILDREN. UNDER  GOVERNOR ABBOTT’S  EYES,  ABBOTT’S APPOINTED TDPS COMMISSIONERS  VIA THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE SCAM  ADDICTS AND ABSORBS AND BLINDS TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT TO SHIELD WITH INVISIBILITY  THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DRUGS, ARMS, AND MOST PRECIOUSLY CHILDREN AND HUMAN BEINGS BEING RELENTLESSLY  TRAFFICKED VIA THE I-10 AND I 59/69.

 

TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT BETRAYED BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS AND TEXAS GOVERNMENT AT ALL LEVELS ARE SHACKLED AND BLINDED BY BEING ABSORBED ENFORCING MILLIONS OF CONTRIVED  DUI ARRESTS;  SEARCHING AND FINDING A FEW SPECKS OF CANNABIS (WHILE SYNDICATE SEMIS OF DRUGS ARE SHIELDED FROM INVESTIGATION ARREST AND CONVICTION FOR POM BY TDPSCD/P RF. IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION. FOR THIS REASON POM IS  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. TDPSCD/P RF ALLOWS SEMI LOADS OF METH, HEROIN, CANNABIS FROM MEXICO, AND MOST IMPORTANT SEMI LOADS OF CHILD SEX SLAVES  TRAFFICKED FROM VENUE TO VENUE EVERY TWO WEEKS TO DO SO UNIMPEDED BY TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT IN ANYWAY, WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY RUINING THE LIVES OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS FOR POM. THIS IS A VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION INHERENT IN THE CONTEXT OF TDPS COMMISSIONERS D/P REVENUE FRAUD MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF POM AS WELL AS DUI.

 

CHILDREN SEX SLAVES ARE PRESENT AT MOST CANTINA IN TEXAS AT ANY MOMENT, AS DRUGS ARE UNIVERSALLY, AND YET WITH ONLY ONE MEMORABLE BUST AT A CANTINA IN HEMPSTEAD TEXAS, AND ONE IN HOUSTON, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF THESE CHILDREN ARE ENSLAVED, HELLISHLY EXPLOITED AND MURDERED BY BEING MADE INVISIBLE BY TRAFFICKING AND TRAFFICKER GOVERNMENT AND ORGANIZED CRIME KINGPINS SHIELDING BY THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  LIKE MILLIONS IN TEXAS FALSELY CONVICTED OF DUI/POM, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF THESE CHILDREN  ARE IN A LIKE MANNER BEING MADE IN  INVISIBLE-DENIED THEIR CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND FALSELY IMPRISONED BY TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, MURDERED ULTIMATELY  BY GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION VIA  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  ABSORBING ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS TO SHIELD CARTEL TRAFFICKING.

 

MILITARY  INFRARED TECHNOLOGY TO VIEW  INTO  SEMIS FROM SILENT HIGH FLYING  DRONES CAN READILY  ASCERTAIN, UNDETECTED, IF SEMIS ARE TRANSPORTING CHILDREN ALONG THE I 10, I 59, AND COMING ACROSS THE BORDER.  HAVING THIS CAPACITY, A COMPLICIT, CONFLICTED  GOVERNMENT DOES NOTHING.  ICE, DHS-AS THEY ARE NOW DOING UNDER PRES. TRUMP- AND THE OFFICERS OF TDPSHPO IF FREED TO DO SO WOULD JOYFULLY WITH PRIDE DO THEIR SWORN DUTY WITH A VENGEANCE TO DESTROY HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING ARRESTING TRAFFICKERS TO THE HIGHEST LEVEL AND FREEING CHILDREN FROM HELL AND MURDER, IF  TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT  UNSHACKLED BEING AWARE WAS FREED FROM

TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ABSORPTION RESCUED THESE CHILDREN AND ARRESTED CARTEL TRAFFICKERS VIA CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING STOPS ALONG THE I 10 AND I 69, ET AL.

 

THE FIVE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS  APPOINTED FOR SIX YEARS WITHOUT COMPENSATION BY GREG ABBOT BY VIRTUE OF BEING GOVERNOR, IN A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (AS SHOWN)  MANAGE  TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  SPECIOUSLY IN THE NAME OF THEIR FAKE CHARITIES  AS A GOVERNMENT IMPOSED  MONOPOLY EXTORTION TO BENEFIT THESE FAKE  CHARITIES. TDPSD/P REVENUE FRAUD OSTENSIBLY  “IS FOR CHARITY”  IS ANOTHER ASPECT OF SHIELDING ORGANIZED CRIME AND GOVERNMENT POLICE CORRUPTION.  A “CHARITABLE END” SUCH AS CHRONICALLY UNDERFUNDED HOSPITAL TRAUMA UNITS, I.E. CARDINAL DINARDO’S CHI-ST. LUKE, OR ROAD IMPROVEMENT JUSTIFIES THE FRAUDULENT  MEANS EVIDENT IN THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF MILLIONS IN TEXAS IN TANDEM WITH THE PROGRAM OF DRIVERS SAFETY LAW AND LICENSE REVOCATION PROGRAM. THE 2003 TDP SAFE DRIVING PROGRAM LAW CONFISCATES VIA TDPSC/D/P RF VIA A CIVIL PROCEDURE THE APPELLANT’S DRIVER’S LICENSE FOR SIGNED BAC BLOOD DRAW REFUSAL FOR 180 DAYS LEAVING THE APPELLANT DEVOID OF HIS TEXAS ID AS WELL.  MOREOVER IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY TDPS SURCHARGES $125 AFTER 180 DAYS TO RECEIVE LICENSE BACK.  BY THE 2003 LAW, ONLY CDL CAN BE CONFISCATED FOR BAC REFUSAL. AND YET THE APPELLANT’S C/M LICENSE WAS ILLEGALLY CONFISCATED. IN PRACTICE, THETDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  VIOLATES IN 95% OF MILLIONS OF LICENSE CONFISCATION IN TEXAS BY THIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROGRAM  THE LETTER OF THE 2003 LAW WHICH WARRANTS SOLELY THE CONFISCATING OF THE CDL.

 

ALL TDPS SURCHARGES DERIVING FROM TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  CONSTITUTE DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION- BUT FOR A GOOD END- TO FUND TRAUMA HOSPITALS LIKE CARDINAL DANIEL DINARDO’S CHI-ST. LUKE AND ROAD IMPROVEMENT.  EXCEPT FOR BEING PAID TO UNCONSTITUTIONALLY STEAL TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS BLOOD UNDER THREAT AND DURESS, CHI ST. LUKE DOES NOT, NOR OTHER TRAUMA UNITS DO NOT RECEIVE MONEY FROM THE DUI/POM TDPSCRF CASH COW SCAM OF TEXAS VOTERS. NOR DOES A PUBLIC MONEY TRAIL OF THIS 2.5 BILLION DOLLARS TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  RUN ALONG  TEXAS ROADS. WHERE DOES THE MONEY GO? IT, LIKE TEN TRILLION DOLLARS VIA THE PENTAGON, JUST DISAPPEARS.

 

THE HEAD COMMISSIONER OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, JOE KUCIEMBE, IS ALSO HEAD OF TILMAN FERTITA’S HUNDRED CLUB.  THE HUNDRED CLUB HAS HISTORICAL ORIGINS IN FREE STATE GALVESTON MACEO/FERTITA SYNDICATE ORGANIZED CRIME CONTROL OF TEXAS GOVERNMENT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT/AND THE BISHOP OF GALVESTON/HOUSTON. ON THE ONE HAND, ANYONE WHO MAKES A DONATION TO THE 100 CLUB AND GETS A WINDOW STICKER CAN EXPECT NOT TO BE PULLED OVER, CITED, AND OR SEARCHED AND ARRESTED FOR DUI/POM BY TDPS ST TROOPERS AND OR THE HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE OR POLICE FORCE FOR RECKLESS DRIVING OR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ONE’S VEHICLE.  A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ARISES FOR THE CEO OF 100 CLUB SERVING  ALSO  AS THE HEAD COMMISSIONER OF THE TDPS IN THE PRETEXT OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. THIS SAME SHIELDING, MAKING INVISIBLE TO TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFECT THE 100 CLUB STICKER HAS ON THE WINDSHIELD OF THE CAR OF THOSE WHO CONTRIBUTE TO THIS OSTENSIBLY  WIDOWS AND ORPHANS BENEVOLENT CHARITY FOR POLICE AND FIRE FIGHTERS APPLIES IN TANEM WITH TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  TO FERTITA/SFC TRAFFICKING SEMIS. PERHAPS THESE SEMI’S HAVE THE STICKER OR SOME OTHER FORM SIGN MAKING  CARTEL TRAFFICKING SEMIS INVISIBLE TO TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE SAME MANNER A HUNDRED CLUB STICKER PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED DOES.

 

 

Governor GREG ABBOT, FAILED TO CERTIFY  AS GOVERNOR  THE APPELLANTS MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION OF JOHN LOVETT IN SJCC 2016-215- THAT EVENTUALLY, WITH THE GOVERNOR’S FULL KNOWLEDGE AND TACIT ASSENT, LEAD TO THE FALSE SENTENCING AND  IMPRISONMENT OF THE APPELLANT AS A INNOCENT VICTIM OF THE TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE SCAM IN SJC JAIL ON MARCH 19TH, 2017 FOR 365 DAYS WITH NO PROBATION BY ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING AS SJCC JUDGE. ABBOTT AS TEXAS GOVERNOR IN FAILING TO CERTIFY LOVETT’S IPSO FACTO DISQUALIFICATION AND ASSENTING TO THE FALSE JAILING OF THE APPELLANT IN SJC JAIL BY ORDER OF LOVETT, ACTED OUT OF A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN NOT CERTIFYING THE APPELLANT’S DISQUALIFICATION MOTION OF LOVETT IN PROTECTING FROM EXPOSURE IN COURT ABBOTT’S TDPSCD/P  ORGANIZED CRIME CRONIES, FERITITA, CARDINAL DINARDO, JEB BUSH AND ABBOTT’S OWN GOVERNMENT/POLICE DUI/POM SCAM FROM BEING PUBLICLY EXPOSED AND IMPEDED DIRECTLY VIA THE TEXAS GOVERNOR’S  CERTIFICATION OF LOVETT’S DISQUALIFICATION BY THE DISQUALIFICATION MOTION OF THE APPELLANT. GOVERNOR ABBOTT’S REFUSAL TO CERTIFY LOVETT’S IPSO FACT DISQUALIFICATION IS A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF JUDICIAL INTEREST ANALOGOUS TO THE MC COURT LAW FIVE JUDGE DISAPPEARING LOVETT’S JUDICIAL FRAUD FROM THE MAY 19TH, 2017 DISMISSAL ORDER FOR JUSTICE.

 

GOVERNOR ABBOTT IN NOT CERTIFYING THE APPELLANT’S TIMELY AND JUST MOTION TO DISQUALIFY LOVETT AS JUDGE IN  RE:  SJCC  2016 -215- BEYOND A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST SO AS NOT TO EXPOSE THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S (ALL APPOINTED AS CRONIES BY GOV. ABBOTT) DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE, ABBOTT SOUGHT THROUGH SUSTAINING  LOVETT’S SENTENCING THE APPELLANT TO 365 DAYS WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION- WHICH DE FACTO ABBOTT DID THROUGH NOT DISQUALIFYING LOVETT BY CERTIFICATION, AND… OR  ABBOTT NOT RESPONDING TO SEVERAL URGENT PLEAS TO THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE FOR JUSTICE  AND THE GOVERNOR’S  INTERVENTION TO PREVENT THE APPELLANT BEING JAILED FOR  365 DAYS IN SJC JAIL IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCHEME.  ABBOT DID SO TO  FALSELY JAIL AND THERE BY POLITICALLY  SILENCE THE APPELLANT DURING THE UPCOMING ELECTION YEAR 2018. THE APPELLANT HAS PUBLICLY CRITICIZED GOV. ABBOTT SINCE 2013 IN SEVERAL HISTORICAL POSTS ON THE APPELLANT’S INTERNET BLOG, HOLY TRANSPARENCY.WORDPRESS.COM .

 

ABBOTT WHILE TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL UNDER THEN GOVERNOR  PERRY, THE APPELLANT SHOWS,  ORCHESTRATED  AS THEN TEXAS AG THE EXONERATION OF  ABORTED ALIVE AND HARVESTED  WHOLE BY PLANNED PARENTHOOD  DR. DOUGLAS KARPEN VIA A CHIP DAVIS/DEVON ANDERSON “KEY MAN GRAND JURY”  NO BILL.  “PRO LIFE”  VOTE ABORTION PROFITEER, ABBOTT,  WHOSE ELECTION AS TEXAS GOVERNOR IS PREMISED ON  A “PRO LIFE”  ENDORSEMENT TO GARNER THE CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN “PRO LIFE” VOTE, WILLED THE SECRETIVE BY KEY MAN GRAND JURY  “NO BILL” EXONERATION OF DOUGLAS KARPEN.   KARPEN’S ARRON WOMAN’S CLINIC IS “OUT PATIENT” LIKE PLANNED PARENTHOOD i-45 (PP MARKET’S INTACT VERY LATE TERM ABORTED ALIVE BY KARPEN BABIES FROM ARRON CLINIC TO BAYLOR MEDICAL SCHOOL INC. WHICH IN TURN  STAFFS B.M.S. INC.  MEDICAL SCHOOL PROFESSORS AS ABORTIONISTS  AT PLANNED PARENTHOOD I-45) AND AS SUCH ARE EXCLUSIVELY IN A STATE “OUT PATIENT CLINIC” MONOPOLY FRANCHISED BY “UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS.”  UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS ENJOYS A LUCRATIVE  TEXAS STATE WIDE GOVERNMENT SPONSORED MONOPOLY OF “OUT PATIENT” SURGICAL CLINICS.

 

ABBOTT  IN 2013,  AS TEXAS AG, HAD A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN COVER UP BY SECRETLY EXONERATING DOUGLAS KARPEN VIA  BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BIASED KEY MAN GRAND JURY.  ABBOTT’S ABORTION BUSINESS CONFLICT OF INTEREST  AS TEXAS AG IN KARPEN’S  EXONERATION  IS EXPOSED   BY THE APPELLANT PUBLICLY ON THE INTERNET IN SEVERAL HISTORICAL POSTS  ON HIS BLOG AT HOLYTRANSPARENCY.WORDPRESS.COM .

 

KARPEN’S  ARRON WOMEN’S ABORTION CLINIC ROUTINELY ABORTS ALIVE – KARPEN’S INFANTICIDE CONTINUES STILL TODAY AFTER ABBOTT ORCHESTRATED KARPEN’S NO BILL EXONERATION IN 2013- LATE TERM BABIES ALIVE BY INFANTICIDE AND SELLS THE BABIES’ BODIES IN TACT TO BAYLOR  MEDICAL SCHOOL, INC.  VIA PLANNED PARENTHOOD I-45 PROCESSING THESE BABIES’ BODIES. PLANNED PARENTHOOD  LIKE ARRON WOMEN’SS CLINIC IS EXCLUSIVELY AMONG  ALL TEXAS ABORTION CLINICS USP FRANCHISED.  KARPEN’S INFANTICIDE ROUTINE WAS EXPOSED IN 2012 BY A MARK KIRCHER LIFE DYNAMICS VIRAL YOU TUBE EXPOSE.  LONG TERM EMPLOYEES ROUTINELY PRACTICING ABORTION BY INFANTICIDE AT KARPEN’S UNITED SURGICAL PARTNER’S OUT PATIENT ABORTION CLINIC GAVE TESTIMONY OF KARPEN’S INFANTICIDE PRACTICE.   KARPEN  UNABATED AS  OUT PATIENT ABORTION CLINIC AND FRANCHISED AS SUCH AS USP MAINTAINS  A SERIES OF MAIMING  BY BOTCHED ABORTION AND EVEN DEATH OF PATIENT’S AT HIS USP CLINIC,  AGAIN NOT IMPEDED BY KARPEN’S  STATUS AS “OUT PATIENT” ABORTION CLINIC PROVIDED PARTNERSHIP IN USP.

 

IN SHORT, THEN. GOV. PERRY, ABBOTT, PLANNED PARENTHOOD I-45, VIA MILA PERRY JONES- PERRY’S LOBBYIST SISTER ALONG WITH HER LOBBYIST HUSBAND FOR UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS  AND BAYLOR MEDICAL SCHOOL INC. (BAYLOR MEDICAL SCHOOL INC. IS, WITH CHI-ST. LUKE-I.E. THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON HOUSTON THE PRIMARY STOCK HOLDER IN UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS)  SUPPRESSED THROUGH OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY CORRUPTED KEY MAN JURY IN EXONERATING KARPEN, KARPEN’S  ARRON ABORTION CLINIC’S  “ENHANCED SAFETY PRACTICE”  IN WOUNDING WOMEN  DURING ABORTIONS AND KARPEN’S ROUTINE PRACTICE OF ABORTING BABIES ALIVE AND WHOLE AND THEN TWISTING THEIR NECKS OR JABBING HIS FINGER INTO THEIR ABDOMEN’S TO MURDER THESE LIVING, VIABLE CHILDREN.

 

THESE FACTS HAD TO BE SUPPRESSED BY ABBOTT’S EXONERATION OF KARPEN FOR GOV. PERRY TO SIGN   IN  JULY SPECIAL SESSION 2013 “PRO LIFE” ABORTION PROFITEER SPURIOUS  HB2 BILL  INTO LAW IN TEXAS BY LAW MANDATING ALL ABORTION CLINIC IN TEXAS- FOR SAFER ABORTIONS- MUST BY LAW BE AMBULATORY SURGICAL. I.E. “OUT PATIENT.”  HB2 LAW SIGN IN A CRIMINAL ABORTION BUSINESS USP STOCK MONEY MAKING SCHEME BY PERRY AS GOVERNOR, SHUTTERED MOST NON OUT PATIENT ABORTION CLINICS-I.E. THOSE THAT COULD NOT PONY UP THE ONE MILLION DOLLAR PLUS CLUB MEMBERSHIP FEE TO BE “OUTPATIENT” TO  MILA PERRY JONE’S  UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS AS SUCH, GRANTING IN THEORY  A VIRTUAL ABORTION  STATE GOVERNMENT BACKED MONOPOLY TO UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS  IN THE LUCRATIVE ABORTION PROVIDER BUSINESS EXCLUSIVELY TO  SINCE 2010 “OUTPATIENT”  PLANNED PARENTHOOD  I-45 THE LARGEST “OUT PATIENT” ABORTED BABY PROCESSING  CLINIC IN THE WESTERN WORLD AND THE EXONERATED DOUGLAS KARPEN’S USP FRANCHISED ARRON’S OUT PATIENT ABORTION CLINIC (FIRST AND UPS OUTPATIENT ABORTION CLINIC FOR OVER A DECADE) WHOSE WHOLE BABY SALES TO USP PLANNED PARENTHOOD i-45 FOR PROCESSING FOR USP BAYLOR MEDICAL SCHOOL IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CARDINAL DINARDO’S CHI-ST. LUKE  WAS COVERED UP AS WELL IN THE SAME EXONERATING STROKE BY TEXAS AG ABBOTT.

CARDINAL DINARDO, AS  A 2010  USP FRANCHISED “GRAND OPENING”  OF  PLANNED PARENTHOOD I-45, THE LARGEST “OUTPATIENT” ABORTION CLINIC IN THE WESTERN WORLD, SECOND LARGEST IN THE WORLD ,  ONLY BEAT  BY PLANNED PARENTHOOD IN CHINA, WHERE ABORTIONS ARE FORCED BY LAW- A  POPULATION CONTROL POLICY FIRST PROPOSED  VIA G.H. BUSH WHEN U.S AMBASSADOR TO CHINA, BUT ONLY ADOPTED AFTER THE DEATH OF MAO- GAVE CORPORATE TRIBUTE BY GIVING ADMITTING PRIVILEGES TO NEAR BY ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL TO BAYLOR M.S. INC FOR BOTCHED ABORTION PATIENTS, BUT ONLY FOR THOSE VICTIMS WHO HAVE INSURANCE TO PAY FOR TREATMENT.

 

MOREOVER,  PLANNED PARENTHOOD I-45 WAS FOUNDED BY  ABBOTT AS “POR LIFE” ENDORSER CARDINAL   DINARDO IN THE TRADITION OF FR. MACIEL DEGOLADO TO PROVIDE LOGISTIC SUPPORT-ABORTION, CONTRACEPTION, STD INSPECTION AND TREATMENT FOR THE TILMAN FERTITA/SFC  CHILD SEX SLAVING  TRAFFICKING BUSINESS EMANATING VIA CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES OUT FROM THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON/HOUSTON BY SEMIS ALONG THE I-10 AND 59/69 IN TANDEM  WITH THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCHEME.

 

GOVERNOR ABBOTT DEFLECTING  SEVERAL DIRECT URGENT PLEAS DURING 2017 BY THE APPELLANT TO BE SAVED FROM BEING FALSELY JAILED FOR 365 DAYS IN SJC BY LOVETT, KNOWINGLY  APPROVED  AND AS GOVERNOR ALLOWED  SAID SENTENCING BY LOVETT TO BE ENFORCED LEADING TO THE  ARREST ON MARCH 13TH, 2017 HOLY THURSDAY AND MARCH 19TH   JAILING FOR 365 DAYS IN THE SJC JAIL .  GOVERNOR ABBOTT ORCHESTRATED  THE JAILING OF THE APPELLANT AT THIS TIME TO SILENCE THE APPELLANT PUBLICLY EXPOSING ABBOTT’S EXONERATION OF DOUGLAS KARPEN  FURTHER  BY HAVING THE APPELLANT JAILED IN TIME FOR THE UPCOMING 2018 GOVERNOR’S ELECTION.  THERE BY, ABBOTT SEEKING RE ELECTION AS GOVERNOR  SCHEMED IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO BY JAILING THE APPELLANT WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION DURING THE UPCOMING ELECTION SEASON,  PRECLUDE THE APPELLANT FROM CONTINUING TO VOICE PUBLICLY ON THE INTERNET  PERRY AND ABBOTT’S HB2  ABORTION BUSINESS  CONFLICT OF INTEREST FRAUD CRIMES BY OBSTRUCTION   OF JUSTICE IN KARPEN’S EXONERATION.  BY ABBOTT’S  SUSTAINING LOVETT’S  ILLEGAL SENTENCING OF THE APPELLANT LEADING TO THE APPELLANT’S ARREST AND JAILING FOR 365, ABBOTT BY NOT ACTING JUSTLY AS TEXAS GOVERNOR AND DOING HIS SWORN DUTY TO UPHOLD THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION ARTICLE FIVE, VIOLATED  THE APPELLANT’S  ‘S 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO FREE SPEECH AND PRESS.

 

 

MOREOVER, OVER  78% OF CHILDREN OF  80,000 PLUS  WHO “DISAPPEAR” INTO CHILD SEX SLAVING IN TEXAS  ARE PIRATED BY ORGANIZED CRIME CHILD SEX SALVE TRAFFICKING SYNDICATES  FROM THE  TEXAS CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES FOSTER CARE PROGRAM. ABBOTT, AS GOVERNOR, INHERITED FROM PERRY,  A  CLASS ACTION LAW SUIT AS TEXAS GOVERNOR BY  “THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN” ADVOCACY GROUP  FOR THE UNCONSCIONABLE HELLISH CPS FOSTER CARE PROGRAM WHO PERRY AND ABBOTT ALIKE AS CRONIES IN THE TDPSD/P REVENUE FRAUD  AS GOVERNOR FOR YEARS TURNED A BLIND EYE TO.

AS A CONCERNED AMERICAN PATRIOT AND A ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIEST MOST CONCERNED FOR SAID CHILDREN AND ALL  300,000 HUMAN BEINGS INVISIBLY ENSLAVED IN TEXAS   VIA THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  THE APPELLANT CALLS FOR AN  IMPANELING OF  A STATE GRAND JURY TO INVESTIGATE UNDER RICO THIS ( I.E. THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD)  ORGANIZED CRIME DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION FRAUD RACKET CORRUPTING TEXAS GOVERNMENT AND STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT BY PIRATING AND ABSORBING,  AND THERE BY  FOSTERS THE ENSLAVEMENT AND MURDER OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN AND HUMAN BEINGS IN TEXAS THROUGH HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVING TRAFFICKING , DRUG ABUSE TRAFFICKING , AND ARMS DEALING TRAFFICKING.

 

PARADOXICALLY, THE TDPSCD/P DOES NOT STOP BY ANY OF ITS MILLIONS OF  UNDER COLOR OF LAW  VIOLATIONS OF TEXANS CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS   IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  TO THE CONTRARY BY DESIGN, THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD PROMOTES, SUSTAINS, AND GROWS UNDER THE CLOAK OF CHURCH AND STATE HUMAN. CHILD SEX SLAVING, DRUG ABUSE, AND GUN VIOLENCE AND MURDER.

 

MOREOVER, TEXAS DUI PROSECUTION LAW SHOULD BE MADE CONSTITUTIONAL BY CHANGING TO REFLECT DUI PROSECUTION LAW OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA: Nebraska Revised Statute 60-6,196 ET AL.

 

IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION ,  DUI CONVICTION IS THE ONLY CLASS OF STATE FELONY AND CLASS A AND B MISDEMEANOR THAT CAN NEVER BE EXPUNGED FROM THE CRIMINAL RECORD OF ANY PERSON IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI AT ANY SAID DEGREE  OF DUI OFFENSE ENHANCEMENT  FOR ANY REASON EXCEPT DUI CONVICTION DISMISSED PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.  THE DUI CHARGE IS ENHANCED BY NOT JUST PROVEN  TDPSCF LAB MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE AND SUPPRESSED BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE POTENTIALLY EXONERATING  THE INNOCENT ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH  DUI BASED SOLELY ON THE DUI INSTANTER ARRESTING OFFICER’S SWORN PROBABLY CAUSE DUI OFFENSE REPORT SELF VERIFIED ESTIMATION  OF DUI SUSPECT’S BAC AT FIRST +  .O8, CLASS B MISDEMEANOR,  AND SECOND AT BAC +.15  ENHANCED TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR.    SECONDARILY, SANCTION IS ENHANCED TO A STATE FELONY, WHEN AS WOULD HAVE BEEN THE CASE WITH JOHN LOVETT ON MAY IST,  A SECOND DUI GUILTY CONVICTION IS ACHIEVED WHEN THE DUI SUSPECT, AS JOHN LOVETT HAS, HAS A PERMANENT RECORD OF A PREVIOUS ARREST FOR DUI.  ENHANCEMENT AFTER FIRST DUI TO A STATE FELONY DUE TO VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE NEVER  TO BE EXPUNGED DUI FROM THE  CRIMINAL RECORD- FOR EXAMPLE AFTER SIX YEARS WITHOUT DUI ARREST AND CONVICTION  THE DUI CONVICTION  ON THE CRIMINAL RECORD WHICH IS A PUBLIC SOURCE OF SCANDAL AND SHAME COULD BE EXPUNGED FROM CRIMINAL RECORD TO REWARD SOBRIETY  AND SAFE DRIVING- BUT TO THE CONTRARY, IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE DUI CONVICTION IS PERMANENT ON THE CRIMINAL RECORD AND AN UNENDING  PUBLIC SOURCE  OF SHAME AND HUMILIATION, UNLIKE ANY OTHER CLASS OF CRIMINAL OFFENSE.  THIS PERMANENT CRIMINAL RECORD  FOR DUI OFFENSE “SOLELY” AND “UNIQUELY” IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE   SINE QUA NON IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD A CRIMINAL ELEMENT IN SAID REVENUE FRAUD BY DRAMATICALLY INCREASING REVENUE FLOW FROM JAILING, PROBATION, TDPS SURCHARGES, AND FINES.  THIS IS WHY IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE DUI CONVICT IS PERMANENT ON THE DUI CONVICT’S CRIMINAL RECORD AND CAN NOT BE EXPUNGED FOR ANY REASON BUT PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

 

AT ARREST  FOR DUI/POM , THE VEILING OF KNOWLEDGE OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IS SINE QUA NON, TO INSTILL LEGALLY VINCIBLE IGNORANCE TO PERPETRATE THE  TDPS  COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  IN SUPPRESSING DUI DEFENDANT CONSTITUTIONAL AWARENESS OF RIGHT TO  BAC REFUSAL AND AS SUCH A  SINE QUA NON ELEMENT TO PERPETRATE TDPSCD/P/REVENUE FRAUD. RES IPSO IGITUR, 100% OF TDPSC DUI /POM REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS UNIQUELY AND EXCLUSIVELY ARE NOT READ  MARANDA RIGHTS IN THE STATE OF TEXAS AT ARREST IN THE PRETEXT OF TDPSCD/P REVENEUE FRAUD SCHEME. THIS IS A VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE GIVING PLAINTIFF STATUS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT TO ALL VICTIMS OF TDPSCD/P FRAUD VICTIMS IN  SAID  VIOLATION OF THE VTH AMENDMENT FOR UNEQUAL DENIAL OF  MIRANDA RIGHTS AT ARREST. NOT READING THE DUI/POM SUSPECT THEIR MIRANDA RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  HAS BEEN UP HELD BY THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT EXCLUSIVELY AND SOLELY AT DUI ARREST IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCHEME. THIS TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IS IN  VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL  PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION.   

 

 FURTHERMORE, AT DUI ARREST IN CONTEXT TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS IN TEXAS  NOT TO BE  READ  MIRANDA RIGHTS HAS A CHILLING EFFECT ON  CIVIL RIGHTS PROTECTIONS AFFORDED BY THE IV. V, AND VI AMENDMENTS  AND AS SUCH  INSTILLS  FEAR AND BLIND SUBMISSION TO ARREST AND  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN VINCIBLE IGNORANCE, SINE QUA NON FOR  PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD AND GREATLY AIDED BY AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DUI PROSECUTION TEXAS STATE CODE.

 

 DUI ARREST IS THE ONLY CLASS A/B MISDEMEANOR IN THE CONTEXT  OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, THAT THE SUSPECT, INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY AND NOT SUBJECT TO GIVE PHYSICAL OR VERBAL EVIDENCE TO INCRIMINATE HIMSELF A PROTECTION AFFORDED BY THE VTH AMENDMEN , IS NOT READ HIS MIRANDA RIGHTS AT THE MOMENT OF ARREST.  SINE QUA NON,  IGNORANCE, FEAR, BLIND SUBMISSION RULE TO PERPETUATE VICTIMS PASSIVITY IN  THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.   UNCONSTITUTIONAL TEXAS DUI/POM PROSECUTION CODE MUST BE MADE CONSTITUTIONAL BY THE READING OF MARANDA RIGHTS  AT TIME OF ARREST FOR DUI/POM AND RECOGNITION BY TEXAS CODE ANYONE IN TEXAS OF SOUND MIND HAS THE RIGHT TO REFUSE OR FREELY CONSENT TO GIVING BLOOD SAMPLE FOR THE BAC TEST, AND HAVE THE 5TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DO SO. WHENEVER IN EVERY CASE  REFUSAL VERBAL, AND.. OR SIGNED IS MADE, NO  BAC TEST CAN LEGALLY BE DONE FOR OR BY THE TDPS OR ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT BODY IN TEXAS,   AND BLOOD SAMPLES CAN NOT BY FORCE BY TAKEN WITHOUT PROVOKING CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LIABILITY THERE BY. 

 

.

 IPSO RES, IGITUR, NOT BEING READ AND  VINCIBLE IGNORANT OF  MARANDA  RIGHTS-,  WITH NO PHYSICAL BAC EVIDENCE AT HAND, JAILED  SOLELY BY DUI  INSTANTER OF TDPSHPO ARRESTING OFFICER’S SWORN DUI OFFENSE REPORT, THIS SAME INSTANTER OFFICER, IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE  WAS NOT THE FIRST OFFICER TO ILLEGALLY STOP AND ARREST THE APPELLANT ON APRIL 4TH, 2016 IN LIBERTY COUNTY I-59. (THE APPELLANT WAS STOPPED AND ARRESTED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE BY A SJC S DEPUTY, JESSE SLAUGHTER)  MOREOVER THE DUI INSTANTER OFFICER THAT NIGHT, TDPSHPO BILLY CORLEY, JR. DID NOT PERSONALLY EVER WITNESS THE APPELLANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL,  AT ANY TIME BEFORE OR AFTER HIS  FIRST ARREST, TDPSHPO ARE CALLED IN BY LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AS PART OF A FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAM TO ISSUE DUI INSTANTERS AFTER THE FACT, NOT FIRST STOPPING WITH PROBABLE CAUSE AND ARRESTING  RANDEM MORTORISTS IN TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD FOR OFFENSES OTHER THAN DUI. THE TDPSHPO WHO ISSUE AN INSTANTER SOLELY ON HIS OWN ALLEGED BAC OBSERVATION EXPERTISE IN ENFORCING TEXAS DUI LAW, NEVER WITNESSES THE LATER AFTER THE FACT OF BEING STOPPED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE, TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIM DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL OF THE VEHICLE  BEFORE OR AFTER ARREST BY ANOTHER OFFICER WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE. THIS IS IN VIOLATION OF THE IVTH AMENDMENT AND INVALIDATES ALL DUI CONVICTIONS IN TEXAS PERPETRATED IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD THERE BY.  SAID VIOLATIONS GIVE PLAINTIFF STANDING  IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT TO ANY ONE IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI THERE BY.

 

 

 IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, THE DUI INSTANTER OFFICER DID NOT BEFORE OR AFTER  FIRST ARREST NOT FOR DUI, PERSONALLY WITNESS THE APPELLANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL OF HIS VEHICLE BEFORE OR AFTER HIS ARREST FOR DUI.  AS SUCH, ALONE,  MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED POSSIBLE EXONERATING BLOOD EVIDENCE ILLEGAL GOTTEN AS FORBIDDEN FRUIT OF A POISONOUS TREE  TRIGGERS A SPURIOUS IN ALL CASES +.15TDPSFC LAB  BAC  REPORT  A MONTH LATER AND THIS FRAUDULENT BAC TEST SUFFICES  SOLELY AND REPLACES IN DUI/POM MALICIOUS  PROSECUTION  IN TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM. REVENUE FRAUD ,  AND UNCONSTITUTIONALLY  REPLACES  AND SUPPLANTS A FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENT OF LICIT DUI CONVICTON,  A CREDIBLE WITNESS OBSERVING THE DEFENDANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL BEFORE OR AFTER STOP AND ARREST FOR OTHER THAN DUI.   THE EXCLUSIVE STANDARD FOR DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS OF DUI BY SPURIOUS TDPSCFLAB BAC REPORT ALONE VIOLATE’S THE IV AMENDMENT AS WELL AS THE VITH, AND EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE. THIS VIOLATION GIVES PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT TO ANYONE IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI THERE BY.  

 

OPEN CONTAINER CHARGES ARE NOT ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE OF  DUI IN COURT DUE TO CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST AS MANUFACTURED PLANTED  EVIDENCE IN FRAUDULENT AND FALSE DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AS EVIDENCED IN APPELLANT’S FALSE DUI CONVICTION BY PLANTED OPEN CONTAINER EVIDENCE. NOR IS AN OPEN CONTAINER AS EVIDENCE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT DERIVED FROM AN OPEN CONTAINER  A DUI SUSPECT WAS DUI AT THE MOMENT OF ARREST DUE TO AN OPEN CONTAINER AT ANY PART OF THE VEHICLE.  VIOLATION OF TEXAS RULE OF EVIDENCE #405, 404, 403.

 

TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ARE FORBIDDEN BY THE IVTH AND VTH AMENDMENT OF BILL OF RIGHTS  FROM DRAWING BLOOD UNDER THREAT AND DURESS FOR THE BAC TEST AND CONDUCTING THE BAC TEST ITSELF AND “SELF CERTIFYING” THE TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY  BAC TEST RESULTS REPORT AS “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL”  AND THERE BY PREVENT A  SELF EVIDENT  CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST EVIDENCED BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONS DUI REVENUE FRAUD USE OF MANUFACTURED BAC EVIDENCE FOR FALSE DUI CONVICTION AND THE SAME NOT ALLOWED TO BE RETESTED BY SAID SAME TDPSCF LAB AND SAID SAME REPORT UNDER SIGNER IN VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW IN 100% OF  TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM. REVENUE FRAUD MALICIOUS PROSECUTIONS IN TEXAS,  EVIDENT IN  THE USE OF A INHERENTLY FALLACIOUS .231 BAC TEST TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT OF A CLASS A  BAC+.15 MISDEMEANOR, DUI.  BLOOD SAMPLES CAN ONLY LICITLY BE DRAWN FOR BAC TEST ONLY WITH REASONABLE AND VOLUNTARY CONSENT OF THE DUI SUBJECT AND CAN ONLY BE DONE LICITLY ONLY BY  AN INDEPENDENT LAB OR MEDICAL FACILITY AT THE EXPENSE OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, AND NOT TAX PAYER EXPENSE DIRECTLY.  AN INDEPENDENT LAB TO DRAW BLOOD AND PROMPTLY COMPLETE THE BAC TEST AND REPORT ALONE BY LAW CAN LEGALLY DRAW BLOOD SAMPLES WITH LEGAL CONSENT AND COMPILE THE BAC REPORT FOR TEXAS STATE DUI PROSECUTION.  FOR A LAB TO BE INDEPENDENT TO THIS END, IT CAN NOT  IMITATE PRACTICE IN ANY WAY CARDINAL DINARDO’S CHI ST. LUKE’S DRAWING  BLOOD FOR THE TDPSCF LAB BAC FRAUDULENT TESTS IN A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON MULTIPLE LEVELS  TO PERPETUATE   TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM. REVENUE FRAUD IN DRAWING BLOOD AND RECEIVING “CHARITABLE” DONATIONS IN RETURN FROM THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD FOR ALLEGED  “TRAUMA UNITS”. 

 

 

THE BAC TEST MUST BE DONE BY A TRULY INDEPENDENT THIRD PARTY WITH NO FINANCIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE BAC TEST SAMPLE RESULTS. THERE CAN BE NO REASONABLE DOUBT THAT EVERY AND ALL BLOOD SAMPLES CONSENTED TO ARE ACTUALLY SUBJECTED TO SCIENTIFIC AND VALID BAC TESTING IN EVERY CASE AND AUDITED BY AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY AS SUCH. SAID INDEPENDENT LAB IS IN IN CONTRADISTINCTION TO CARDINAL DINARDO’S CHI-ST.LUKE WHICH HAS A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN DRAWING BLOOD TO BE THAN TESTED BY TDPSCF LAB IN HARRIS COUNTY DUE TO ORGANIZED CRIME CONNECTIONS THROUGH CATHOLIC CHARITIES, CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES IN TANDEM WITH CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING BY THE FERTITA SYNDICATE (THAT CONTROLS GOV. ABBOTT, CARDINAL DINARDO, AND THE TDPSFC LAB THROUGH THE FIVE COMMISSIONERS) AND THE SINALOA FEDERATION CARTEL FOSTERED BY THE JPII/FR. MACIEL/CARLOS SLIM HELU CHASE/VATICAN BANK.  THE  FRAUDULENT MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED BLOOD SAMPLE  BAC EVIDENCE UNCONSTITUTIONALLY PIRATED FROM SAID UN CONSTITUTIONAL BLOOD DRAWS BY CHI-ST. LUKE’S NOT ONLY PRODUCE REVENUE FOR CHI ST. LUKE AS SUCH THROUGH ORGANIZED CRIME TRAFFICKING CONNECTION BY SUSTAINING THE DUI REVENUE FRAUD, BUT IN ABSORBING ALL COURT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IN SAID SCAM, CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES COMPLICITY IN CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FERTITA/SFC IS HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT FROM BEING UNVEILED BY THE COURTS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IN TEXAS BY UNDER COLOR OF LAW SUIT AND CLASS ACTION SUIT.  THE EVIDENCE OF THIS IS IN THAT TEXAS COURTS AND TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE NEVER MADE A CHILD SEX SLAVE STOP AND ARREST ALONG THE I-10 ANDI- 69 WHILE HOUSTON/GALVESTON IS THE GREATEST CHILD SEX SLAVING HUB IN THE WORLD. A RECENT U.T. REPORT STATES THERE ARE  300,000 HUMAN TRAFFICKING VICTIMS, I.E. SLAVES, IN TEXAS, 78,000 CHILD SEX SLAVES PIRATED FROM TCPA AND FOSTER CARE SYSTEM -WHO ARE ROUTINELY MOVED IN SEMI TRUCKS  EVERY TWO WEEKS. AS IS EVIDENCED NO STOPS AND ARRESTS MADE OF   SEMI LOADS OF CANNABIS, HEROIN, METH, AND GUNS TRAFFICKED BY SAID ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE.

 

BAC BLOOD DRAWS TO BE USED IN DUI CRIMINAL PROSECUTION  CANNOT BE DRAWN  BY AN INDEPENDENT LAB WITHOUT SUSPECT’S CONSENT AND TRAINED AND CORRECT BAC LEVEL TESTIMONY OF  PROBABLE CAUSE OF  +.O8  BY ARRESTING OFFICER AT HAND.  BLOOD CANNOT BE TAKEN WITHOUT DUI PROBABLE CAUSE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, OR IF SUSPECT VERBALLY REFUSES AND/OR SIGNS A BAC REFUSAL.

 

 

 

THE BAC TEST IF CONSENTED TO BY  DUI SUSPECT IN CUSTODY MUST BE FULLY COMPLETED IN A REASONABLE TIME PERIOD ASAP  AND BAC TEST RESULT PUBLICIZED WITHIN  24 HOURS FOR THE +.O8  BAC DUI SUSPECT AND/OR ATTORNEY TO KNOW BEFORE P.C. HEARING IN SAID CASE.  BEFORE THE DUI SUSPECT IS JAILED PURSUANT OF THE DEFENDANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.  THE ADMINISTRATION OF BAC TEST WARRANTED SOLELY BY THE INSTANTER DUI ARRESTS OFFICER’S SWORN  UN VERIFIED BY BAC TEST ASSESSMENT THE DUI SUSPECT, WITHOUT WITNESSING SAID SUSPECT IN PERSON DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL BEFORE OR AFTER INSTANTER DUI ARREST, IS NOT EVIDENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE AND  CANNOT BE THE ONLY AND EXCLUSIVE CRIMINAL ELEMENT OF PROBABLE CAUSE OF DUI IN TEXAS FOR DUI PROSECUTION AND CONVICTION.  SUCH IS THE ANTI CONSTITUTIONAL CIRCULAR LOGIC OF THE BAC TEST AS BE ALL AND END ALL IN DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CASES OF THE TDPS COMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

THE BAC TEST FREELY CONSENTED TO- OR ONLY WHEN REASONABLE REFUSAL OF THE BAC TEST IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR THE DUI SUSPECT  DUE TO THE MANIFESTLY EVIDENT + .15  BAC OF THE DUI SUSPECT-MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN TWO HOURS OR ASAP BY INDEPENDENT BAC TEST  LAB ALSO DRAWING THE BLOOD SAMPLES AT THE SAME TIME. THE RESULTS MUST BY MADE KNOWN TO BAC TEST SUBJECT ASAP AFTER BEING COMPLETED.  IF AT OR BELOW .O8 BAC THE ARRESTED PERSON MUST BE IMMEDIATELY RELEASED,  IF ABOVE THE DUI SUSPECT MAY BE JAILED ON DUI PROBABLY CAUSE.  IN EITHER SCENARIO, THE BAC TEST RESULTS MUST BE REPORTED PUBLICLY- FOR EXAMPLE ON THE INTERNET WITHIN 24TH HOURS OF THE BAC TEST BEING COMPILED.

TEXAS DUI BAC TEST ABUSE IN NOT FOLLOWING THIS CONSTITUTIONAL  BAC TEST DUI CRIMINAL PROSECUTION PROTOCOL IN THE NEBRASKA DUI CRIMINAL CODE HAS VIOLATED THEREBY ROUTINELY BY SAID BAC TEST DUI  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF EVERYONE IN TEXAS CONVICTED THERE BY OF DUI.  TO PERPETRATE THE  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, THE BAC TEST RESULTS AFTER DUI INSTANTER ISSUED   ARE NOT MADE KNOW TO THE DUI SUBJECT AFTER BLOOD SAMPLES FOR BAC TEST ARE DRAWN.  RATHER, BLOOD SAMPLES ARE MAILED NOT REFRIGERATED TO THE TDPSFC LAB, HARRIS COUNTY TRIGGERING A TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST RESULTS  UNDERSIGNED REPORT GENERALLY A MONTH OR SO LATER.  iN EVERY INSTANCE THEREBY POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC TEST RESULTS ARE SUPPRESSED IN THE INSTANTER JAILED DUI SUSPECT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  THIS ROUTINE SUPPRESSION OF POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC TEST LEVEL RESULTS  FOR ABOUT A MONTH TO 45 DAYS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE  TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VIOLATES THE DUI SUSPECTS WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT WRITS IN EVERY INSTANCE AN GIVES PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT TO ANY IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI THERE BY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

THE BAC TEST REPORT CANNOT BE USED AS THE SOL IPSO FACTO VERIFICATION OF THE INSTANTER OFFICER’S  PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT OF PROBABLE CAUSE OF DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL.

 

AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, THE INSTANTER DUI OFFENSE ARREST TDPSHP OFFICER’S DUI  OFFENSE REPORT- THE OFFICER DID NOT IN PERSON  WITNESS AT ANY TIME BEFORE OR AFTER THE APPELLANT’S ARREST EXCLUSIVELY FOR DUI, THE APPELLANT AS DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL, NOR REFERENCES SAID INSTANTER TDPSHPO HE DID NOT IN PERSON AT ANY TIME WITNESS THE APPELLANT DUI  BEHIND THE WHEEL, BEFORE OR AFTER THE APPELLANTS FALSE ARREST WITH NO PROBABLY CAUSE FIRST BY JESSE SLAUGHTER, AND SECONDLY BY SAID INSTANTER ISSUING OFFICER, TDPSHPO  BILLY CORLEY EXCLUSIVELY FOR DUI.  SAID DUI  SPURIOUS DUI OFFENSE REPORT BY SAID OFFICER   DOES NOT INDICATE THE APPELLANT  IN CUSTODY FOR  DUI ARREST PROBABLE CAUSE WAS DUI AT .231 BAC- ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT- WHICH THE SUBSEQUENT  SPURIOUS TDPSCF LAB  .231 BAC REPORT IN CONTRADICTION TO ALL THE  SPURIOUS BAC DETAILS  FALSELY CONVICTED  THE APPELLANT THEREBY.

 

A LICIT INDEPENDENT  BAC REPORT IS  NOT “SOL”, BUT AMONG SEVERAL  CRIMINAL ELEMENTS OF EVIDENCE CONSTITUTING  DUI PROBABLE CAUSE AND LICIT DUI CONVICTION THAT  THE DUI DEFENDANT  IS  DUI OPERATING A VEHICLE.

 

THE DUI ARRESTING OFFICER,  WARRANTING iNSTANTER JAILING OF THE DUI SUSPECT  AND  WARRANTS TDPSCF BAC TESTING SOLELY DUE TO SAID OFFICER’S EXPERT BAC ASSESSMENT  WHEN UNVERIFIED TESTIMONY BY HEARSAY, OR WHENEVER, SAID OFFICER DID NOT IN PERSON WITNESSED AND THEREBY CAN  UNDER OATH ATTEST TO DUI PROBABLE CAUSE, DUI  DEFENDANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL BEFORE AND AFTER HIS ARREST,  AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE, AND NOT BASED ON HEARSAY BY ANOTHER WITNESS AFTER THE FACT. THE APPELLANT WAS NOT WITNESSED DIRECTLY BY SAID ARRESTING DUI INSTANTER OFFICER  AS DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL ,  BUT WAS  MERELY ASSUMED SO BY THE DUI INSTANTER ARREST OFFICER BASED SOLELY ON HEARSAY BY THE ORIGINAL ARRESTING OFFICER WHO ARRESTED THE APPELLANT ON THE NIGHT OF APRIL 4TH, 2016 WITH NO PROBABLE CAUSE, JESSE SLAUGHTER.  A “NOTE” BY SAID OFFICER IN THE PROSECUTION FILE FOR SAID APPELLANT  COMPLETELY CONTRADICTS SLAUGHTERS  ALLEGED HEARSAY STATEMENTS REFERENCED IN INSTANTER DUI OFFENSE REPORT THAT SAME DATE BY BILLY CORLEY THAT THE APPELLANT ON SAID DATE WAS OBSERVED BY A THIRD PARTY DRIVING RECKLESSLY RUNNING SEVERAL CARS OFF THE ROAD- THIS WOULD BE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR DUI ARREST IF IT WERE VERIFIABLE AS TRUE BY BEING  IN PERSON WITNESSED BY BILLY CORLEY.  SUCH RECKLESS DRIVING IS AN INDICATOR OF BAC .231, THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT. BILLY CORLEY IN HIS COMPLETELY SPURIOUS TDPSHP DUI OFFENSE REPORT THAT EVENING ALSO SWEARS SLAUGHTER WHO IN HIS NOTE SAYS SOLELY THE APPELLANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN HIS LINE-THE 59 IS ONE WAY WITH NO YELLOW DIVIDING LINES-  NOT MAINTAINING THE LINE IS NOT A TRAFFIC OFFENSE  IN TEXAS- RE IPSO IGITUR, SALUGHTER ARRESTED THE APPELLANT FIRST THAT NIGHT WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE. MOREOVER, CORLEY QUOTING SLAUGHTER IN SAID COMPLETELY SPURIOUS DUI REPORT SWEARS SLAUGHTER WITNESSED THE APPELLANT AFTER HIS INITIAL FALSE ARREST WITH RED EYES AND THE SMELL OF ALCOHOL ON HIS BREATH BEHIND THE WHEEL.  SLAUGHTER’S NOT SAYS NO SUCH THING

THIS ALL MAKES  VALID ARGUMENT THAT THE ARRESTING FOR DUI OFFICER CAN NOT BE CALLED IN IF SAID OFFICER DID NOT HIMSELF STOP AND ARREST FIRST FOR PROBABLE CAUSE THE DUI SUSPECT WHO SAID OFFICER DID IN PERSON BEFORE, AND AFTER INITIAL ARREST WITNESS THE SUSPECT WITH PROBABLE CAUSE BEHIND THE WHEEL.  BAC TEST AND DUI ARREST OFFICER WITNESSING IN PERSON THE DUI SUSPECT DUI BEFORE AND OR AFTER ARREST DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL IN PERSON  IS NOT AN EITHER/OR AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE AND MOST CASES IN TEXAS, BUT A BOTH..AND, WITH THE ARRESTING DUI OFFICER WITNESSING IN PERSON AND SWEARING THEREBY PROBABLY CAUSE FOR DUI ARREST OF A SUBJECT SINE QUA NON FIRST AND FOREMOST IN RELATION TO THE BAC TEST RESULTS  IN TEXAS.  SUCH A SCENARIO ALLOWS AN ARRESTING DUI OFFICER TO SWEAR IN COURT IN DOING HIS DUTY THAT THE DUI DEFENDANT WAS DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL BY SAID OFFICER’S  OBSERVATION OF FACT IN PERSON TESTIMONY  TO THIS ELEMENT EVEN IF THE BAC TEST LEVEL REPORT’S -.O8 IN SAID CASE.

 

AS SUCH,  ALL AND EVERYONE IN TEXAS CONVICTED BY MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED TDPSCF LAB SPURIOUS  SELF CERTIFIED BAC TEST EVIDENCE OF DUI WITH NO CORROBORATING   TESTIMONY BY THE FIRST ARRESTING WITH PROBABLE CAUSE OFFICER   OF THE SUSPECT, THAT HE OR SHE WITNESSED IN PERSON  AND CAN THERE BY SWEAR  IN COURT,  THE DUI SUSPECT  WAS WITNESSED BY SAID FIRST ARRESTING WITH PROBABLE CAUSE DUI INSTANTER ISSUING OFFICER WAS AT ANYTIME BEFORE ARREST DUI AND OR BEHIND THE WHEEL OF THEIR VEHICLE INTOXICATED  BEYOND .08 BAC  AFTER ARREST WITH PROBABLE CAUSE,  HAS PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT THEREBY.

 

 

THE USE OF MANUFACTURED .231 BAC REPORT FOR FALSE 2016 DUI CONVICTION IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE TO FALSELY CONVICT HIM CONTRADICTED THE DUI PROBABLE CAUSE ON THE DUI OFFENSE REPORT BY TDPS HPO BILLY CORLEY THAT IN NO WAY SPECIFIED A .231 BAC LEVEL FOR THE APPELLANT IN THE REPORT.  USING THE FRAUDULENT BAC REPORT IN 100% OF DUI FALSE CONVICTIONS IN PLEA BARGAINING OR AT TRIAL BEGS THE QUESTION HOW DID OFFICERS  ARREST DUI SUSPECTS AND FAIRLY AND JUSTLY  CONVICT THEM WITH EVIDENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE BEFORE THE RELATIVELY RECENT REIGN OF DUI FALSE CONVICTION EXCLUSIVITY OF THE BAC TEST?

 

BAC TEST BLOOD SAMPLES IN VIOLATION OF THE 5TH AMENDMENT ARE BY FORCE TAKEN FOR MANUFACTURED BAC EVIDENCE BY THE POLICE IN 100% OF CASES OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AS SINE QUA NON IN THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S  DUI REVENUE FRAUD AND IS THE “BE ALL TO END ALL”  OF CURRENT MALICIOUS DUI PROSECUTION IN THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORTS OF MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED BAC TEST BLOOD SAMPLE  “EVIDENCE” DUI FALSE CONVICTION  EXCLUSIVITY  IS  THE FOUNDATION  OF THE CURRENT SYSTEMIC ALL ENCOMPASSING  DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ,  AS SUCH VIA  COLOR OF LAW VIOLATION BY THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD SCAM ON ALL LEVEL’S OF DUI ENFORCEMENT VIA MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE TDPSCF LAB SELF VERIFIED BAC REPORT EXCLUSIVITY IN FALSELY CONVICTING ANY ONE IN TEXAS OF DUI.

 

SINE QUA NON, VIA THE  TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM  REVENUE FRAUD SCAM SUPPRESSED AS POSSIBLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE  BLOOD SAMPLES TRIGGERING THE MANIFESTLY SPURIOUS  TDPSFC LAB  BAC TEST IS TAKEN  UNDER DURESS AND IN VIOLATION  OF THE IVTH AND VTH AMENDMENT, AND THEREBY THE VITH AMENDMENT IN 100% OF TEXAS DUI PROSECUTION CASES, WITH NEVER AN EXCEPTION,  SINE QUA NON IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  EVEN IN SPITE OF  A SIGNED DIC -24  BAC BLOOD SAMPLE REFUSAL.

 

SAID SAME BLOOD SAMPLES WILL NEVER  BE RETESTED BY THE TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY,  FOR JUSTICE SAKE WHEN SHOWN TO BE SUPPRESSED FOR A MONTH OR MORE IN THE STATE OF TEXAS AS POSSIBLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE, THEN SAID SAME SAMPLES AS A MERE PROP TRIGGER MANUFACTURED  AND CONTRIVED AND CONTRARY TO FACT TDPSCF LAB SELF CERTIFIED UNDERSIGNED BAC REPORTS  AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.   THERE BY  IN VIOLATION OF THE MICHAEL MORTON LAW IN EVERY DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS.

AS SUCH, ANY ONE CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS THERE BY GAINS PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

THE MICHAEL MORTON LAW MUST BE HONORED DUI PROSECUTION IN EVERY CASE FOR LICIT DUI CONVICTION IN THE STATE OF TEXAS.

 

ANYONE CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS HAS BEEN BY TDPSCF LAB REFUSAL IN ALL DUI PROSECUTION  TO RETEST  FOR ANY REASON THEIR SELF CERTIFIED BAC TEST REPORT DISPUTED FOR  REASONABLE  CAUSE “IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND NOT SOLELY FOR CONVICTIONS” BY DUI DEFENDANT AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, IS RES IPSO IGITUR AND THEREBY DENIED BY TDPSCF LAB REFUSAL TO RETEST SUPPRESSED BLOOD SAMPLES  AND MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE OF TDPSCF LAB  THEIR MICHAEL MORTON LAWS THEREBY PURSUANT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  AS SUCH, ANYONE CONVICTED OF DUI  IN TEXAS, GAINS PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

BLOOD SAMPLES MAILED TO TDPSFC LAB, HARRIS COUNTY, NOT  REFRIGERATED,  FIRST SUPPRESSED FOR A MONTH UNDER THE GUISE OF HARRIS COUNTY LAB BACKLOG, AS POTENTIALLY EXONERATING OF DUI , AND THEN TO TRIGGER AS  A  SPECIOUS PROP MANUFACTURED  EVIDENCE OF + .15 BAC EVIDENCED  BY  100% OF THE TDPSCF LAB SELF CERTIFYING BAC REPORT,  MUST, AND ARE, SINE QUA NON  IN 100% OF TDPSCF LAB  BAC REPORTS  REPORTED AT  ABOVE BAC + .15, OVER 95% AT  BAC .20 ,  SAID OVERWHELMING PREPONDERANCE OF BAC +.15-.20 + DUI EVIDENCED TDPSCF LAB REPORTS EVERY YEAR REPORTED, WITH NOT ONE -.O8 BAC  TDPSCF LAB REPORT ISSUED THAT THE APPELLANT KNOWS OF, OF PUBLIC RECORD, WITH THE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION OF JOHN LOVETT’S STILL NOT PUBLICIZED TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT AT BAC OO.OO, OR LESS, THIS IS REPORTED IN 100% OF DUI PROSECUTIONS IN TEXAS TO FALSELY CONVICTED OF DUI, AND SINE QUA NON,  TO ASSURE AND TO PERPETUATE THE TDPSC DUI/POM REVENUE  FRAUD SCAM   WILL CONTINUE UNABATED BY LAW SUITS FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND NOT BE EXPOSED AS A FRAUD,  MAKING THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS  AND THEIR GOVERNMENT AND ORGANIZED CRIME CRONIES  CRIMINALLY AND CIVILLY LIABLE FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION FOR DUI IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD TO MILLIONS OF THEIR VICTIMS IN TEXAS.

ANYONE CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS THEREBY GAINS PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

ALL BAC REPORTS IN DUI PROSECUTION IN TEXAS ARE SUBJECT WITH PROBABLE CAUSE TO RETESTING PURSUANT OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW. 

 

IF  BAC REPORT BY AN INDEPENDENT LAB  IS BELOW .O8 THE SUSPECT MUST BE RELEASED, ABOVE  .O8 THE BAC REPORT MUST BE PLACED ON A PUBLIC WEBSITE WITHIN 24 HOURS WITH PERTINENT OFFENSE INFORMATION- DATE AND OFFENSE SITE- AND PLACE OF JAILING FOR OFFENSE.

 

ALL CONVICTIONS OF DUI/POM IN TEXAS PREMISED ON THE TDPSFC BAC TEST  AS EVIDENCE OF GUILT ARE FOR JUSTICE TO BE EXPUNGED FROM CRIMINAL RECORD OF ALL THOSE CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS.

 

FORFEITURE OF LICENSE AND SURCHARGES WARRANTED BY THE  2003 SAFE DRIVING PROGRAM CANNOT BE LAWFULLY APPLIED TO TEXANS DEFRAUDED BY SAID DUI REVENUE FRAUD THROUGH FALSE CONVICTION AND SENTENCING.  MOREOVER, BY SAID LAW, ON LEGAL AND JUST DUI CONVICTION, SUSPENSION APPLIES ONLY TO CDL, NOT OTHER LICENSES, C,B.M  FOR REFUSAL, CONVICTION AND OTHER MOVING VIOLATIONS AND YET 95% OF THE MILLIONS  OF TEXAS LICENCES SUSPENDED SINCE 2003 BY THIS INHERENTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW HAVE BEEN OTHER THAN CDL, THAT IS CLASS B,C,M IN VIOLATION OF THE SET LEGAL PARAMETERS OF SAID LAW.  THE LICENSES MUST BY  SAID LAW AND BY THE CONSTITUTION BE RETURNED WITHOUT SURCHARGES  AND ALL SURCHARGES BE REPAID.

 

CLOSING STATEMENT:

 

THE  APPELLANT. AS ALL IN TEXAS MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTED BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, IN ALL SAID CASES  ESTOPPEL BY THE MAY 19TH MCC LAW 5 TO DISMISS  FOR JUSTICE COURT ORDER IS DENIED  UNDER COLOR OF LAW HIS VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT AND  EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR TIME FALSELY IMPRISONED AND HARM DONE BY SAID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER, DERIVING FROM FORBIDDEN FRUIT OF A POISONOUS TREE, ESTOPPEL CAUSE 2016 -215- SJCC,  TO FACE  HIS ACCUSERS (JOHN LOVETT AND AFTER THE FACT ACCOMPLICES)  IN A COURT OF LAW , AS  PLAINTIFF WITH EXONERATING SJC COURT LEGAL DOCUMENT EVIDENCE  IN  A  PUBLIC TRIAL WITH A JURISPRUDENTA  AND IMPARTIAL JUDGE AND JURY.   AS EXHIBITS 2 -5  DOCUMENT  – APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI INSTANTER AND TDPSHP DUI OFFENSE REPORT CORROBORATE  IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 STATE, A NON EXISTENT ARREST AND SEARCH SITE- MPM 450 I-59 SAN JACINTO COUNTY AS WELL AS DEC. 24TH, 2015 ON THE CAUSE NO: 2016-215 SJC COURT CRIMINAL COMPLAINT  AND SPURIOUS APRIL 6TH, 2017 PROBATION ORDER  BY JOHN LOVETT.  ADMIT NO CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING BY  JOHN LOVETT AS SJCC JUDGE IN APPELLANT’S SAID CAUSES, AND ACCOMPLICES OF THE SJCC  AND MCC BEFORE AND AFTER THE FACT OF THE APPELLANT’S FALSE APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI CONVICTION ON 2/23/17 SJCC IN ALL SAID ESTOPPEL AND SJCC CAUSE NO: 2016 -215-  , NOR CAN THE APPELLANT BE LITIGATED TO OR IS ANY PHYSICAL  EVIDENCE LIKE OPEN CONTAINER NOR  BAC BLOOD SAMPLE  IN VIOLATION OF tHE TEXAS rULES OF EVIDENCE,  LEGALLY ADMISSIBLE IN A COURT HEARING FROM NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE ARREST AND SEARCH CITES ON A DATE SAID DUI OFFENSE(DECEMBER 25,2015) DID NOT HAPPEN AS NOTED BY THE AB INITO DUI INSTANTER AND TDPSHPO DATE OF APRIL 4TH, 2016  .  RES IPSO IGITUR,  JOHN LOVETT AB INITIO AND ALL SJC AND MC JUDGES IN ESTOPPEL AB INITIO NEVER HAD CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING AS SJCC OR MCC IN ESTOPPEL JUDGE, RENDERING ALL PLEADING, HEARING, TRIAL, CONVICTION, AND SENTENCING, WARRANTS, PROBATION, FINES, AND CRIMINAL RECORD NULL AND VOID AB INITIO AND MISTRIAL.

 

LOVETT, AS PERSONA SOL  DERIVED  NO JUDICIAL STANDING IN SAID CAUSE NO. 2016 -215- AS SJCC JUDGE FROM A FALLACIOUS DUI  OFFENSE SITE, 450 MPM I 59, SJC, AND STATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT DUI OFFENSE DATE,  CHRISTMAS EVE, DECEMBER 24TH, 2015 (CHANGED IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001  BY LOVETT AND  SJCC ACCOMPLICES  FROM APRIL 4TH, 2016 AS AN ANTI CATHOLIC SLUR TO DEFAME THE MORAL INTEGRITY OF THE APPELLANT AS A CATHOLIC PRIEST AND PREJUDICE THE JURY BY DEFAMING THE APPELLANT AS A ROGUE CATHOLIC PRIEST DRUNK OUT OF HIS MIND AT THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT, BAC.231,  ON CHRISTMAS  EVE  RECKLESS RUNNING SEVERAL MOTORISTS OF THE ROAD AND ALMOST STRIKING A MOTORIST ON THE 59 BEFORE BEING STOPPED FROM ALMOST KILLING SOMEONE ALLEGEDLY.  THEREBY  IN VIOLATION OF TEXAS RULE OF EVIDENCE 404  PURSUANT OF  FALSELY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT  BY PERJURY  BEFORE A LIED TO JURY BY THE JUDGE AND PROSECUTION, WITHOUT THE APPELLANT’S KNOWLEDGE IN ABSENTIA  BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  USING THE SJCC TO PERPETRATE AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME UNDER COLOR OF LAW IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS UTILIZING  CRIMINAL ELEMENTS OF A TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY  COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD SCAM AS THE CONTEXT. RES IPSO, IGITUR  LOVETT,  BY SAID TDPS COMMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD SCAM DEFRAUDING AND HARMING THE APPELLANT PERPETRATED SAID FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS  WHILE SPECIOUSLY MASQUERADING  AS SJCC JUDGE HAVING NO JUDICIAL STANDING  WHILE IMPERSONATING  SJCC JUDGE IN SAID CAUSE NO: 2016 -215- AS DID ALL MC COURT ACTING AS JUDGES IN ALL SAID ESTOPPEL  AFTER THE FACTO DO.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR,  AS PERSONA SOL,  ONLY A LEGAL PERSON, LOVETT UNLAWFULLY ORDERED AS SJCC JUDGE  APRIL 6TH, 2017 INVALID AND DELICT  EXTRADITION WARRANT FOR THE APPELLANT’S FALSE  ARREST RE: 2016, APRIL 4TH  DUI/ FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT  RE: THE APPELLANT’S UNLAWFUL FEB. 23RD 2017  IN ABSENTIA TRIAL AND FALSE CONVICTION BY JURY WITH MANUFACTURE EVIDENCE OF BAC .231 RES IPSO ENHANCED TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR, ALL FRUITS OF A POISONOUS TREE, THE TREE OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF AN ANTI  CATHOLIC HATE  AGAINST THE APPELLANT AB INITIO IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

THE APPELLANT PRO SE  BY SAID NULL AND VOID UNCONSTITUTIONAL MISTRIAL, AND ALL SAID ESTOPPEL MC COURT HEARING AND TRIA IS DENIED  BY JOHN LOVETT AS PERSONA SOL PRESIDING, AS WELL AS MC COURT ACTING AS JUDGES, WAYNE MACK, PAUL DAMICO IN SAID ESTOPPEL HEARINGS AS PERSONA SOL PRESIDING , IS DENIED HIS VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT AB INITIO  BY THE SJCC  AND MCC THEREBY IN SAID CAUSE AND ESTOPPEL AFTER THE FACT, TRIED AND CONVICTED IN ABSENTIA ON SAID DATE 2/23/17 SJCC IN AB SENTIA WITHOUT FOREKNOWLEDGE AND RATIFICATION, RES IPSO, IGITUR  DENIED THE VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT BY ALL SAID ESTOPPEL MCC JUDGES AND SJCC JUDGES TO FACE ACCUSERS (JOHN LOVETT AND SJCC AND TDPS ACCOMPLICES IN A COURT OF LAW  IN A FAIR AND JUST  PUBLIC TRIAL PRESIDED OVER BY A NON PARTIAL AND NOT RELIGIOUSLY BIGOTED  JUDGE  AND JURY, SAID JUDGE HAVING  CONSTITUTIONAL, STATE, DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING AS SJCC  OR MCC JUDGE RE: CAUSE NO: 2016 -215-

 

MOREOVER, JOHN LOVETT, ACTING AS PERSONA SOL, WITH NO CONSTITUTIONAL STANDING ( EVIDENCE PROVES)  WAS TIMELY SERVED 2/23/17 BY THE SAID SAME THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE IN SJCC CAUSE 2016-215,  A MOTION RES IPSO IGITUR OF DISQUALIFICATION OF A JUDGE-WITH FACTUAL BASIS (EXHIBIT 13)  PENDING CERTIFICATION OF GOVERNOR GREG ABBOTT.  LOVETT  DISMISSED  AND DISAVOWED WITHOUT DUE DILIGENCE AND PROCESS SAID TIMELY SUBMITTED MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION OF A JUDGE  AB INITIO TRIGGERED  BY LOVETT’S  JANUARY 9TH, 2017  SJCC DISCOVERY COURT VIOLATION OF THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE  2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHT TO RETEST A  SELF EVIDENTLY FRAUDULENT TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI REVENUE FRAUD  .231 BAC TDPSFC LAB REPORT, WITH OUT A PRE TRAIL HEARING,  ON 2/23/17 USED AS ENHANCING EVIDENCE TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT OF 1ST DUI, BAC + .15, A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR.

 

SAID 2/23/17 MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JOHN LOVETT AS JUDGE  PRESCIND  ALL MOTIONS AND ORDERS BY SAID SJCC BENCH PENDING SUSTAINED AND CERTIFIED  JUDICIAL STANDING AND/OR  BY GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, TC A5. CERTIFIED JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION OR RECUSAL BY JUDGE,   RESOLVED EQUITABLY AND JUSTLY AND CERTIFIED BY TEXAS CONSTITUTION BY GOVERNOR GREG ABBOTT.  MOREOVER, LOVETT IN DISMISSING SAID MOTION AND THE GOVERNOR’S CERTIFICATION, SPECIOUSLY  DID NOT INFORM A PEER JUDGE ABOUT SAID MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PER ADJUDICATION,  A VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, OF SAID MOTION TO DISQUALIFY.  LOVETT   BY T.C. SECTION 5 MUST FIRST  CONSULT A JUDGE PEER TO RESOLVE  SAID MOTION  BEFORE GOING TO  TRIAL RE: CAUSE 2016-215, IN SPITE OF THE APPELLANT’S  VITH AMENDMENT AND FRANKLY HUMAN RIGHTS,  CONSULTED  A PEER JUDGE  SOLELY AND EXCLUSIVELY ON (COURT RECORDS OF PROCEEDINGS THAT DAY WERE SAID TO BE UNAVAILABLE TO THE APPELLANT BY THE DISTRICT COUNTY CLERK FOR UNKNOWN REASONS WHEN APPELLANT ATTEMPTED TO ASCERTAIN THE NAME OF THIS PEER JUDGE A VIOLATION OF DEFENDANT’S RIGHT TO A PUBLIC TRIAL OF COURT RECORD)   THE FEASIBILITY OF TRYING APPELLANT PRO SE IN CAUSE NO. 2016-215- SJCC IN ABSENTIA.

 

JOHN LOVETT , UNLAWFULLY DISAVOWING SAID MOTION TO DISQUALIFY LOVETT AS SJCC JUDGE RE: 2016-215-DID THEN VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF TDPS COMMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  FALSELY CONVICT  2/23/17 IN SJCC  THE APPELLANT  IN PERPETRATING  AGAINST SAID APPELLANT SAID ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE TDPSC  DUI REVENUE FRAUD SCAM IN CONSPIRACY WITH SJCC ACCOMPLICES  ASS. DA CHRISTINA T. WOOD, AND JOHN BOEMIO, WITH MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE BE IT BAC .231 SWORN TO UNDER OATH AT SAID MISTRIAL TRIAL BY TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY HARRIS COUNTY FORENSIC LABORATORY BAC TECHNICIAN SCIENTIST RACHEL AUBEL. THE RESULTS OF ABEL’S TDPSFCLAB BAC. .213 REPORT COMPILED  IN MAY 2016 (THIS BAC .231. REPORT DATE MAKES IMPOSSIBLE THE DECEMBER 24, 2015 OFFENSE DATE ON THE STATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT UNDERSIGNED BY ASS DA CHRISTINA WOOD AGAINST THE APPELLANT AS WELL AS THE SAME SAID DATE OF OFFENSE ON LOVETT’S UNLAWFUL APRIL 6TH, 2017 SENTENCING AND ORDER OF PROBATION IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001) ARE CONTRADICTED BY THE DUI PROBABLE CAUSE REPORT OF TDPS HPO BILLY CORLEY’S BAC DUI PROBABLY CAUSE DESCRIPTION, APRIL 4TH, 2016 OF THE APPELLANT’S .231 INDICATIVE BAC BEHAVIOR THAT DOES NOT ATTEST TO BAC .231 LEVEL OF IMPAIRMENT OF THE APPELLANT TO THE .231 BAC DEGREE. I.E. ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT OF .O8.   MOREOVER,  THE TOTALITY OF  CORLEY’S APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI TDPSHPO OFFENSE REPORT,  CORLEY SWORE TO AS STATE WITNESS IN FALSELY CONVICTING  THE APPELLANT  2/23/17 IS  FALLACIOUS IN ALL DETAILS AND SELF- CONTRADICTORY IN EVERY FACT.

 

EXCEPTING  ONE  FALLACIOUS BAC. .231 LEVEL IDENTIFIABLE BEHAVIOR CORLEY ATTRIBUTED TO THE APPELLANT CORLEY FALSELY ATTRIBUTED TO JESSE SLAUGHTER TESTIMONY AT THE NON EXISTENT MPM 450 I-59 , APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI ARREST SITE,   AS EVIDENCE OF DUI ON APRIL 4, 2016 , GIVEN AS VERBAL TESTIMONY AGAINST THE APPELLANT AS A SWORN WITNESS OF THE ARRESTING OFFICER, SJC DEP. JESSE SLAUGHTER, CORLEY  SWORE QUOTING WHAT ARRESTING OFFICER JESSE SLAUGHTER TESTIFIED TO HIM AT THE ARREST SITE AFTER THE APPELLANT’S ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLY CAUSE AND AFTER THE FACT AT THE TIME CORLEY ARRIVED AT MPM 450 i-59, ON APRIL 4TH, 2016 OFFENCE REPORT, THAT APPELLANT DRIVING RECKLESSLY (THIS WOULD BE AN ELEMENT CONSISTENT WITH BAC.231 INDICATORS IF THIS REPORT WAS INDEED FACTUAL AND VERIFIED AND NOT CONTRADICTORY) DROVE SEVERAL VEHICLES OFF THE ROAD MOMENTS BEFORE THE APPELLANT  WAS WAS RUN OFF THE ROAD BY SLAUGHTER INTO A CONSTRUCTION AREA AND FALSELY ARRESTED WITHOUT PROBABLY CAUSE, NOR WAS THIS .231 BAC INDICATOR ATTRIBUTED AS TESTIMONY INCRIMINATING THE APPELLANT OF DUI  EVER STATED BY SLAUGHTER IN AN OFFICIAL POLICE REPORT OR CITATION, BUT RATHER WAS NOT MENTIONED IN SLAUGHTER’S NOTORIOUS STATE PROSECUTION FILE.  What CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBE AS “A NOTE’ BY SLAUGHTER, NOT A PROBABLE CAUSE FOR STOP AND ARREST REPORT IN ANY WAY, NOT A CITATION FROM THE TIME FOR RECKLESS DRIVING BEFORE THE TIME OF THE APPELLANT’S STOP AND ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE, IN THE STATE’S PROSECUTION FILE FOR CAUSE NO.2016 -215- DOES NOT STATE THE APPELLANT DRIVING RECKLESSLY DROVE SEVERAL VEHICLES OFF THE ROAD ALMOST “STRIKING A MOTORIST” ACCORDING TO CORLEY’S TDPSHPO QUOTING SLAUGHTER’S SPOKEN TESTIMONY, BUT IN SLAUGHTER’S NOTE   SLAUGHTER SIMPLY AND MERELY OBSERVED THE  APPELLANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN HIS LINE .  FAILING TO MAINTAIN ONE’S LINE AND EVEN NEARLY MISSING A MOTOR VEHICLE IS NOT A TRAFFIC VIOLATION IN TEXAS. NOR IS SAID DRIVING BEHAVIOR EXCLUSIVELY INDICATIVE OF BAC TO THE . 231.    IF SLAUGHTER TESTIFIED SO AS CORLEY SAID SLAUGHTER  TESTIFIED,  AND WOULD AGAIN TESTIFY TO IN SJCC AS A CORROBORATING     WITNESS NAMED AS SO ON CORLEY’S TDHPO DUI OFFENSE REPORT THE APPELLANT ON THE EVENING OF APRIL 4TH, 2017 IN  RECKLESS OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE CONSISTENT WITH A BAC  .231 WHY DID SLAUGHTER NOT DO HIS SWORN DUTY AND CITE AND RECORD IN A PROBABLE CAUSE ARREST REPORT THESE MULTIPLE TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS OF RECKLESS DRIVING AND SEVERAL SERIAL MOTORIST ENDANGERMENT INDICATIVE OF BAC. 231 INSTEAD OF SUBMITTING A NON OFFICIAL “NOTE”  AFTER THE FACT.

 

RES IPSO IGITUR,   THE APPELLANT’S VTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED UNDER COLOR OF LAW AB INITIO BY SLAUGHTER WHO HAVING FIRST HIMSELF RECKLESSLY DROVE THE APPELLANT OFF THE HIGHWAY,  DID NOT CITE  HIM IN ANYWAY OR FILE A PROBABLE CAUSE AND ARREST REPORT, ONLY AN INNOCUOUS “NOTE” WHICH DOES NOT CORROBORATE SAID TESTIMONY BY SLAUGHTER TO CORLEY IN CORLEYS TDPSO REPORT  INCRIMINATING THE APPELLANT THAT EVENING DRIVING SEVERAL VEHICLES OF THE ROAD, ET. AL,

 

THERE ARE NO   OTHER SPECIFIED INDICATORS  OF THE APPELLANT IN CUSTODY EXHIBITING BEHAVIOR  BAC .231: THESE SPECIFIC BAC AT .231- ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT  ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD BAC CHART :  A COMPLETE LOSS OF NORMAL MENTAL AND PHYSICAL CAPACITY. CORLEY AT APPELLANT’S BEHEST, IN A FURTIVE ATTEMPT BY THE APPELLANT AT THIS JUNCTURE TO ASSERT HIS VTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, ASKED THE APPELLANT IF HE WOULD SIGN A WRITTEN BAC REFUSAL. THE APPELLANT REPLIED ABSOLUTELY AND SIGNED HIS NAME. CORLEY  AT THIS TIME, AS REQUIRED BY LAW, DID NOT AT THAT TIME READ THE DIC 24 TO THE APPELLANT.  ALL SAID REASONABLE AND COMPREHENDED COMMUNICATION OF BAC REFUSAL  AND A LEGALLY BINDING SIGNING OF THE BAC REFUSAL FORM AT BAC .231 IS NOT POSSIBLE AND THEREFORE VALID LEGALLY.  RES IPSO, IGITUR, THE SIGNING OF THE REFUSAL  VIEWED BY TDPS AS A CONFESSION AND GUILTY PLEA AT .231 BAC IS NULL AND VOID DUE TO LOSS OF MENTAL CAPACITY.   IF INDEED CORLEY  WAS PROFESSIONALLY  TRAINED TO IDENTIFY ACCURATELY TO THE FURTHEST  DEGREES OF .231  BAC IMPAIRMENT AND COMPETENTLY COULD AND DID SO – AND CORLEY AT NO TIME WITNESSED THE APPELLANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL OF HIS VEHICLE BEFORE OR AFTER HIS ARREST –  ASSESSED THE APPELLANT IN HIS LEGAL JUDGEMENT AS A TDPSHPO AT BAC .231 (IN FACT, CORLEY’S  TENDERING TO BE  SIGNED BAC  REFUSAL AND READING OF THE DIC 24, WHICH CORLEY IN CONTRADICTION OF  PREVIOUS DUI OFFENSE REPORT NUMBERS SAID AT. NO. 14 HE READ TO THE APPELLANT THE DIC 24 -WHICH CORLEY AT NO TIME AFTER THE APPELLANT’S ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE EVER READ- STATES IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 CORLEY READ TO THE DUI DEFENDANT IMMEDIATELY BEFORE CORLEY TOOK THE APPELLANT IN CUSTODY INTO CHI-ST.LUKES ) WOULD HAVE BEEN BY THE FACT CORLEY JUDGED THE APPELLANT AT THAT MOMENT AT. .231 BAC IMPAIRMENT INCAPABLE OF RESPONSE AN ABSURD ACTION ON CORLEY’S PART, IN ALLEGED EXPERT ASSESSMENT OF THE APPELLANT AT .231 BAC LEVEL, I.E. IN COMPLETE LOSS OF MENTAL AND PHYSICAL CAPACITY AND THE BAC SIGNED REFUSAL CONFUSION LEGALLY NULL AND VOID THEREBY.

 

IF CORLEY HAD OBSERVED IN REALITY THE APPELLANT AT .231 BAC  CONSENT AND THE TENDERING OF A SIGNED REFUSAL, ALL SAID ABOVE BY TEXAS BAC LAW IS UNNECESSARY AND UNWARRANTED BY TEXAS BAC CONSENT LAW.  AT .231 BAC, TEXAS BAC LAW DOES NOT ALLOW FOR WRITTEN REFUSAL (INVALID BECAUSE OF BAC  TOTAL IMPAIRMENT OF MENTAL CAPACITY. MOREOVER, TEXAS LAW AT .231  ALLOWS AND MANDATES THE TAKING OF BAC BLOOD SAMPLES WITHOUT CONSENT FROM “INCAPACITATED” DUI SUSPECTS AT .231, WELL,  INJURED, OR DEAD. At BAC .231

 

CORLEY ELECTED FREELY TO  CONDUCT A SUI GENERIS  FIELD SOBRIETY TEST  IN THE APPELLANT’S RECOLLECTION OF THE DUI SUSPECT   NOT CORRESPONDING  TO THE TDPS  MANUEL DUI FIELD SOBRIETY TEST PARADIGM OF THE TDPSHP.  BE THAT AS IT MAY,  AT .231 BAC , A PROPER FIELD SOBRIETY TEST  IS  NOT POSSIBLE FOR THE DUI SUSPECT BAC. 231  TO REASONABLE COMPREHEND AND PHYSICALLY BEGIN AND TO COMPLETE.  WHY IF CORLEY PROFESSIONALLY AND COMPETENTLY ASSESSED THE APPELLANT AT .213 BAC   WAS THE FST ADMINISTERED THEREFORE AB INITO. THE APPELLANT, NONETHELESS, – ALTHOUGH  FRAUDULENTLY ADMINISTERED-BY CORLEY-COMPLETED AND SCORED POINTS ON FST, NOT A POSSIBILITY AT BAC. 231/

 

A PRIME BAC.231 INDICATOR IS BLACK OUT AND LOSS OF MEMORY.  THE APPELLANT DURING ALMOST FOUR HOURS OF CUSTODY DID NOT BLACK OUT OR EVER LOOSE MEMORY OF HIS FALSE ARREST FOR DUI BY CORLEY AND NOW AT THIS VERY MOMENT THE APPELLANT’S FALSE JAILING IN VIOLATION OF  THE APPELLANT’S CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW ON APRIL 4TH, 2016, THE APPELLANT PROTESTED CONTINUALLY TO CORLEY  ABOUT IN HIS  CUSTODY.  CORLEY IN HIS OFFENSE REPORT DOES NOT REPORT THE APPELLANT BLACK OUT , AND AWAKENING EXPERIENCING A LOSS OF RECENT  MEMORY.

 

INCONTINENCE IS A PRIME INDICATOR OF BAC. 231. CORLEY IN HIS DUI OFFENSE REPORT DOES NOT REPORT THE APPELLANT AS INCONTINENT AT ANY TIME OVER A FOUR HOUR PERIOD IN CUSTODY

.

THE LACK OF ANY PRIME INDICATORS OF BAC. 231 MANIFEST ON APRIL 4TH, 2016 IN THE APPELLANT SWORN TO IN CORLEY’S TDPSHP DUI OFFENSE REPORT IN CONTRADICTION TO THE TDPSCF LAB REPORT UNDERSIGNED BY TDPSCF LAB BAC TECHNICIAN AT BAC. 231  SPURIOUSLY ATTRIBUTED TO THE APPELLANT AND AGAIN SWORN TO BY RACHEL AUBEL TO BE “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL”  IN THE SJCC BEFORE LOVETT, ACTING AS JUDGE, PERSONA SOL, TO CONVICT FALSELY VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION THE APPELLANT ON 2/23/17 OF AN ENHANCED THERE BY TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR 1ST DUI OFFENSE DENYING THEREBY  1ST DUI DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION TO THE APPELLANT AB INITO,

SHOWS THAT THAT BOTH BAC LEVEL REPORTS SWORN TO IN A COURT OF LAW ARE MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY AND RES IPSO, IGITUR MUTUALLY  UNTRUE, NOT PROFESSIONALLY OR SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIED, AND AS SUCH TDPS MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE (THE .231 BAC) EXONERATING THE APPELLANT VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION EMPLOYED TO FALSE CONVICT AND JAIL THE APPELLANT IN COMMISSION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME IN THE CONTEXT OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

THE APPELLANT ALLEGES THE BAC. 231 TEST RESULT ON AUBELS SAID BAC REPORT ASSIGNED TO THE APPELLANT,  IN NO  MANNER WAS ACTUALLY DERIVED FROM THE APPELLANT’S BLOOD SAMPLES PIRATED UNDER DURESS AT CHI ST. LUKES, LIVINGSTON TEXAS BY  CARDINAL  DINARDO’S  CRONIES IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. SAID BAC TEST WAS NEVER ACTUALLY PREFORMED BY AUBEL AND THE RESULTS UNDERSIGNED BY AUBEL TO BE “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL.”

 

TO THE CONTRARY,  THE BAC. 23I, THE HIGHEST BAC LEVEL ON THE STANDARD BAC CHART, WAS MALICIOUSLY AND ARBITRARILY BRANDED ON THE APPELLANT IN SAID SPURIOUS TDPSFC LAB REPORT UNDERSIGNED AND SWORN  TO IN A COURT OF LAW  BY AUBEL,  A VIOLENT AND CYNICAL, IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P  REVENUE FRAUD, ATTACK ON THE APPELLANT FOR MAKING VERBAL DEFENSE UNDER FALSE ARREST PURSUANT OF THE 1ST AMENDMENT VOICING THE APPELLANT’S CIVIL AND GENEVA CONVENTION RIGHTS ARE VIOLATED BY THE PIRATING OF HIS BLOOD UNDER DURESS AT CHI ST. LUKES BY ALL SAID CRONIES OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE/FRAUD.

 

AWARE,  UNDERSTANDING WITH 100% SCIENTIFICALLY BY HIS PERFECTLY HEALTHY LIVER, SAID .231 BAC TEST SPURIOUS REPORT TRIGGERED BY THE APPELLANT’S PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES ON APRIL 4, 2016 AT CHI-ST. LUKES SAID TO BE BAC. .231, THE HIGHEST BAC DESIGNATION ON THE STANDARD BAC CHART, AND ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT OF .O8 WAS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT MALICIOUSLY CONTRIVED AND FALLACIOUS, THE APPELLANT MADE MOTION FOR A SJCC ORDER BY LOVETT IN HEARING TO RETEST SAID FALLACIOUS MALICIOUS .231 BAC REPORT PURSUANT “OF JUSTICE AND NOT ONLY CONVICTION” IN ACCORD WITH THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW.

 

THE APPELLANT, WAS UNLAWFULLY DENIED HIS MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS  BY LOVETT  IN DISCOVERY COURT, JANUARY 9TH,  TO HAVE A SAID TDPSCF LAB REPORT BAC .231 RE TESTED  FOR PROBABLE CAUSE OF FOUL PLAY FOR SAID SAME REASONS OF NO PRIME INDICATORS OF BAC. 231 IN CORLEY’S REPORTS, RETESTED  BY TDPSFC  .231 BAC REPORT UNDER SIGNER  BY RACHEL AUBEL,   CORLEY’S APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI OFFENSE REPORT CORROBORATES  THE APPELLANT WAS NOT AT .231 BAC THE EVENING OF APRIL 4, 2017 AS BOTH CORLEY AND AUBEL IN CONJUNCTION WITH ASS DA CHRISTINA WOODS SWORE TO UNDER OATH IN SJCC IN MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTING THE APPELLANT AND FALSELY CONVICTING HIM OF 1ST DUI  ENHANCED BY BAC +  .15 CLASS A MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT OF COMMISSION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC  HATE CRIME AGAINST THE APPELLANT.

 

BILLY CORLEY  IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 SWEARS TDPS DUIOFFENSE REPORT AT NO. 14, CORLEY READ SAID APPELLANT THE DIC 24 RIGHT BEFORE ENTERING CHI-ST.LUKE. A  SELF CONTRADICTION.   CHRONOLOGICALLY,  CORLEY TRANSPORT THE APPELLANT IN LENGTHY CUSTODY TO CHI-ST. LUKES AFTER HE FIRST SIGNED A WRITTEN BAC REFUSAL. CORLEY STATES ONLY AT THE MOMENT BEFORE ENTERING CHI-ST.LUKE- FOR WHAT INTENDED PURPOSE IN THE FIRST PLACE- DID HE READ THE APPELLANT THE DIC -24 AND TENDERED THE REFUSAL DOCUMENT THAT THE APPELLANT HAD ALREADY SIGNED.  CORLEY AT THAT TIME OR AT ANY TIME, VIOLATING THE APPELLANTS DIC 24 RIGHTS  NEVER READ SAID DOCUMENT EVER TO THE APPELLANT.    AS A RESULT, APPELLANT WAS NEVER INFORMED AT ANYTIME BY CORLEY  HE WOULD LOSE HIS LICENSE IN AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL CIVIL PROCESS, THE TDPS LSP AN ELEMENT OF THE TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD,  AS AN IMMEDIATE PENALTY FOR  SIGNED BAC REFUSAL, CONSIDERED A CONFESSION BY  TDPS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P FRAUD.  THEREBY, THE APPELLANT WAS  DENIED HIS  RIGHT BY NOT BEING READ THE DIC-24  BY SAID LAW TO A HEARING  WITHIN 15 DAYS TO GET HIS LICENSE BACK

 

MOST IMPORTANTLY ALL SAME SAID DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL PERPETRATING THE TDPSC DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD AGAINST THE APPELLANT WOULD VIOLENTLY SEIZE UNDER DURESS THE APPELLANTS  BLOOD IN SPITE OF THE APPELLANT HAVING  WILLINGLY SIGNED A DOCUMENTED  BAC REFUSAL WITHOUT FIRST BEING READ THE DIC -24. . If CORLEY, AS HE STATED IN NO. 14 DID IN TRUTH EVER READ THE DIC -24 TO THE APPELLANT AND  MADE THE APPELLANT AWARE AT ALLEGEDLY BAC .231 OF ALL THE ABOVE, WHAT MOTIVATION, WHEN RESISTANCE IS FUTILE, WOULD  THE APPELLANT REASONABLE  ENTERTAIN TO SIGN THE BAC REFUSAL ONLY TO LOOSE HIS LICENSE IN DOING SO FOR 180 DAYS- THE APPELLANT NOT READ  DIC 24 COULD NOT KNOW HE WOULD LOOSE HIS LICENSE FOR SIGNED BAC TEST SAMPLE REFUSAL. AND MOST SHOCKINGLY,  THE APPELLANT DID NOT KNOW  HIS BLOOD WOULD BE PIRATED IN SPITE OF  SIGNED BAC REFUSAL NEVERTHELESS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

EVERY WORD IN CORLEY’S REPORT IS FALLACIOUS AND CONTRADICTORY TO THE FACTS AND TRUE OCCURRENCE OF EVENTS IN NUMEROUS VIOLATIONS OF FCC 1001.

AS SUCH, THE APPELLANT’S LICENCES, C/M/ AND LIVELIHOOD CDL WERE ARE ARE UNJUSTLY CONFISCATED AT THIS TIME CRIMINALLY BY THE TDPSHPO BILLY CORLEY, IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. THIS IN TURN LED TO THE APPELLANT BEING FALSELY CONVICTED BY JURY ON MARCH 13TH, 2017 OF DRIVING WITH SUSPENDED LICENSE, THEREBY, IN THE MC JUSTICE COURT ACTING AS JUDGE WAYNE MACK, PERSONA SOL WITH FRUITS FROM A POISONOUS TREE RE:SJCC 2016 -215-.

 

MOREOVER, JUDGE EARNEST MCCONNEL, PERSONA SOL, WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING FOR SAID SAME FACTUAL GROUNDS DISQUALIFYING LOVETT AS SJCC JUDGE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE RE:SJCC 2016 -215- , AT 11:00 PM  APRIL 4TH, 2016,  CALLED IN BY CORLEY TO CARDINAL DANIEL DINARDO’S CHI-ST. LUKE HOSPITAL IN LIVINGSTON, TEXAS,  DID WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING AND AGAINST THE APPELLANT’S SIGNED REFUSAL,  OBSERVING DIRECTLY AND SPEAKING TO SAID APPELLANT AND HEARING ONLY THE FALLACIOUS TESTIMONY BASED SOLELY ON  HEARSAY OF JESSE SLAUGHTER OF BILLY CORLEY NOT ADMITTING TO ANY PROBABLE CAUSE THE APPELLANT WAS AT BAC .231 DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL WITH NO VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF BAC .231 IN FACING THE APPELLANT IN CUSTODY, WITH THERE BY,   NO VISIBLE OR VERBAL PROBABLY CAUSE THE APPELLANT WAS AT THAT MOMENT AT .231 BAC,  DID ORDER WITHOUT PROBABLY CAUSE OF BAC .231  A BLOOD WARRANT TO UNLAWFULLY SEIZE THE APPELLANT’S BLOOD AND  DID THEREBY VIOLATE UNDER COLOR OF LAW PURSUANT OF THE TDPS DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  FRAUD REVENUE, THE APPELLANT’S I. IVTH. VTH, VI, VIII, XVIII, AND XXI AMENDMENT RIGHTS BY SAID INVALID DELICT BLOOD WARRANT ON APRIL 4TH, 2016, IN CONSPIRACY AND COMPLICITY TO COMMIT SAID FRAUD  WITH CHI-LUKE  LINKED TDPS BAC FRAUDULENT TESTING COMPLICIT GUIDELINES CODIFIED AND SANCTIONED BY CARDINAL DANIEL DANARDO IN CAPACITY AS MEDICAL ETHICS AND POLICY DIRECTOR OF CHI-ST.LUKES, LIVINGSTON AND CORPORATE EXCUTIVE PARTNER CHI-ST. LUKES.

 

 

 

IN CONCLUSION:

 

SAID MOTION TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE  ONLY SAID CHARGES OF DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID AN ESTOPPEL CAUSE NO 2016-215- ORDERED BY ACTING AS JUDGE  DAMICO ON MAY 19TH, 2017 LAW 5, WAS NOT PRESENTED TO APPELLANT PRO SE NOR RATIFIED BY SAID APPELLANT IN A TIMELY AND REQUIRED MANNER,  RENDERING SAID MOTION AND SUBSEQUENT COURT ORDER NULL AND VOID.

 

THE VIOLATION OF APPELLANT’S VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHT- EXCESSIVE BAIL- FOR A SPECIOUS, SPURIOUS VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION BY LOVETT, CAUSED SAID APPELLANT TO BE FALSELY JAILED VIA EXCESSIVE BAIL. SAID MAY 19TH MOTION FOR JUSTICE AND MC COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL  IS IN FACT UNJUST AND A VIOLATION OF APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT’S  TO BE EXONERATED BY SJC COURT DOCUMENT EVIDENCE IN HAND AT HEARING TO PLEAD INNOCENT, TO CONFRONT HIS ACCUSERS (JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES) IN A COURT OF LAW   PRESIDED OVER BY AN IMPARTIAL AND NOT RELIGIOUSLY BIGOTED JUDGE WITH CONSTITUTIONAL/ STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING. AND AT ANY TIME DURING HEARING IN COURT TO MAKE MOTIONS, AND FIRST AND FOREMOST, MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL CHARGES, SENTENCING, SANCTIONS, PROBATION, ET. ALL AND EXPUNGE RECORD PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

 

SAID MAY 19TH  DELICT MOTION TO DISMISS  FOR JUSTICE AND COURT ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE  IS A COVER UP RUSE BY  M.C.SHERRIFF DEPARTMENT AND MC. COURT LAW FIVE  OF SAID COURT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT MALFEASANCE IN FALSELY ARRESTING, JAILING, AND DENYING IN SAID COVER UP RUSE APPELLANT’S  RIGHT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO  A FAIR  AND PUBLIC TRIAL AS PLAINTIFF AGAINST HIS FALSE ACCUSERS.  THE MAY 19TH MOCK MOTION AND COURT ORDER IS THE  SECOND INSTANCE OF JUDICIAL  MALFEASANCE  SAID SAME MC DEPARTMENT AND COURT AND JUDGE DISAVOWING  DUE DILIGENCE AFTER BEING TOLD IN PERSON AND IN A COURT OF LAW  IN HEARING BY APPELLANT ON MARCH 14TH, 2017 IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANTS TRANSPORTATION RIGHTS,  JOHN LOVETT HAD ISSUED IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SAID  WARRANT APRIL 6TH FOR THE APPELLANT ‘S ARREST AND EXTRADITION TO SJC  JAIL TO SERVE  365 DAYS, THE LEGAL MAXIMUM, WITHOUT PROBATION, SENTENCED IN ABSENTIA  UNLAWFULLY BY LOVETT  TO TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT.

 

BY SAID DELICT WARRANT, THE APPELLANT WAS  FALSELY ARREST AFTER TRAIL ON MARCH 13TH, 2017, IMMEDIATELY AFTER BEING FALSELY CONVICTED  FOR DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID IN SAID MC COURT, , AND ESTOPPEL OF SJCC 2016-215-   IN THE COURT OF JUDGE WAYNE MACK. SAID  MAY 19TH ORDER  REFERENCED  MOTION TO DISMISS   A PREVIOUS ‘DRIVING WITH A SUSPENDED LICENSE’ DERIVING FROM THE 2016 DUI BAC REFUSAL WHICH AS SAID WAS NOT INVALID UNDER TEXAS REFUSAL LAW SINCE THERE WAS NO PROBABLE CAUSE OF DUI BAC. 231 IN THE DEFENDANT AFTER AN INITIAL FALSE  ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE BY SJC DEP. SHERIFF JESSE SLAUGHTER ON THE EVENING OF APRIL 4TH, 2016.

 

AFTER A FALSE CONVICTION ON MARCH 13TH, IN THE COURT OF JUDGE WAYNE MACK FOR DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID, PREMISED UPON THE MC ASS DA  BEFORE SAID TRAIL VIOLATING APPELLANT’S XITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO A FAIR AND PUBLIC TRIAL BY NOT SUBMITTING THE STATE PROSECUTOR WITNESSES LIST TO THE APPELLANT BEFORE THE MARCH 13TH TRIAL TO BE VETTED,  MC ASS. DA ALLEGEDLY COUCHED TDPS HP OFFICER TO SAY SHE COULD NOT RECALL TAKING AN APPLICATION FOR A TDPS DRIVING LICENSE DATED, FILLED, AND SIGNED THAT DAY APPELLANT WAS STOPPED WITH PROBABLE CAUSE BY SAID  TESTIFYING OFFICE FROM APPELLANT THAT MAY HAVE EXONERATING THE DEFENDANT OF MALICIOUS INTENT IN DRIVING THAT DAY WITH LICENSE SUSPENDED IN THE MINDS OF THE JURY.

 

SAID MAY 19TH ORDER DENIED THE APPELLANT HIS VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO APPEAL SAID MARCH 13TH FALSE  IN JUDGE MACK’S COURT ON MARCH 13TH, 20017 FOR SAID GROUNDS: THE DEFENDANT PRO SE WAS NOT GIVEN THE STATE’S WITNESS LIST TO SEE AND VET.

 

THE LACK OF DUE DILIGENCE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT FACT BY THE MC LAW FIVE COURT IN TANDEM WITH TMCSD DEPUTIES TO DETECT LOVETT’S  WARRANT AS INVALID AND DELICT DENYING THE APPELLANT A FAIR AND UNPREJUDICED HEARING AT ARREST AND HIS TRANSPORTATION RIGHTS AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS THEREBY,  LEAD DIRECTLY TO THE APPELLANT’S MARCH 13, HOLY THURSDAY JAILING FOR THE HOLY WEEK TRIDIUM  AT THE MOUNTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT JAIL, CONROE, TEXAS WITHOUT BAIL TO BE EXPEDITED TO SJC JAIL ON MARCH 19TH,  TO SERVE TWICE THE LEGAL MAXIMUM SENTENCE OF 365 DAYS FOR 1ST DUI  WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION IN THE SJC JAIL BY ORDER OF SJCJ JOHN LOVETT ACTING AS PERSONA SOL PURSUANT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE COMMISSION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.

 

 

 

LOVETT, ALLEGEDLY ALWAYS INTOXICATED IN COURT, HAS DENIED, NOT JUST THE APPELLANT, BUT STILL TO THIS DAY, AS SUCH, HUNDREDS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS  OF THEIR VITH AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS. THE MAY 19TH ORDER HAS ALLOWED LOVETT, DRUNK OR SOBER REGARDLESS, AND HIS ACCOMPLICES, THE TDPS, ET AL.  IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD UNABATED TO CONTINUE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION NOT ONLY AGAINST THE APPELLANT BUT AGAINST ALL IN TEXAS IN FACT AND IN DEED ALL SAID EVIDENCE IN THE APPELLANT’S APPEAL SHOWS.

 

EVERY YEAR, IN THE IMAGE AND LIKENESS OF THE APPELLANT, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS IN TEXAS ARE RENDERED UNKNOWINGLY VICTIMS OF THE TDPSCD/PFRAUD AND MADE VINCIBLE  IGNORANT AT ARREST BY NOT BEING READ  MIRANDA RIGHTS AND THE DIC-24 AT SIGNED REFUSAL OF HAVING THEIR BLOOD PIRATED FOR PROPS TO MANUFACTURE AND SUPPRESS EXONERATING EVIDENCE VIA THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS IN TEXAS EACH YEAR IN THE CONTEXT AND PROMOTION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ARE SUBJECTED UNDER COLOR OF LAW TO VIOLATIONS OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: IST, IVTH, VTH, VITH, VIIITH, XVIIITH, XXITH, WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND STATE OF TEXAS RIGHTS-UNIVERSAL DENIAL OF THE RIGHT TO RETEST DNA/BAC BLOOD EVIDENCE IN THE CONTEXT AND PROMOTION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VIOLATING THE 2012  MICHAEL MORTON LAW TO RETEST DNA EVIDENCE(BAC BLOOD SAMPLES INCLUDED) “IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, AND NOT SOLELY CONVICTIONS. PEOPLE IN TEXAS  INTERNATIONAL LAW GENEVA CONVENTION HUMAN RIGHTS OF VIOLATED  BY TDPS “NO REFUSAL” POLICY  PIRATING OF BLOOD FROM VICTIMS TRIGGERING A FRAUDULENT TDPSCF LAB BAC SELF VALIDATING REPORT INCRIMINATING THEM IN PRACTICALLY EVERY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF +.15 BAC ENHANCING 1ST DUI TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR, INTIMIDATING DRACONIAN  SANCTIONS, AND RES IPSO DISQUALIFICATION OF DUI DEFENDANT FOR DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION.  THE GENEVA CONVENTION FORBIDS EXPERIMENTATION ON PRISONERS OF WAR- ALL BAC TESTING IS EXPERIMENTATION- THIS INCLUDES NEO PROHIBITION WAR ON ALCOHOL IN VIOLATION OF THE VXIIITH AMENDMENT IN THE CONTEXT AND PROMOTION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, AS WELL AS SUBJECTING TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS TO IMPRISONED EXPOSURE TO FELLOW SUSPECT DUI/POM PRISONERS BEING TESTED LIKE THEM FOR TUBERCULOSIS BY THE STATE, EXPOSING THEM IN CLOSE CONFINEMENT POSSIBLY TO A DREADED DISEASE TUBERCULOSIS IN THE CONTEXT AND PROMOTION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

THIS VIOLATION OF ALL SAID RIGHTS OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS EACH YEAR IN THE CONTEXT AND PROMOTION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD TRIGGERS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DUI/POM INDICTMENTS BASED ON NON EXISTENT OFFENSE ADDRESSES IN SAN JACINTO COUNTY AND FALLACIOUS DATES OF OFFENSES (NOT JUST IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE), AND IN 99.7 % CASES TERMINATING IN GUILTY 1ST DUI CONVICTIONS  VIA PLEA “BARGAINS”  DEFRAUDING THE TDPSD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIM VIA MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSION OF POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC EVIDENCE IN EVERY CASE UNSCRUPULOUS SJC  ASS DA   LIARS, WHICH HAVE NON EXISTENT OFFENSE ADDRESSES IN SAN JACINTO COUNTY AND FALLACIOUS DATES OF OFFENSES,

99.7 OF THE SAME NOT KNOWING THEIR RIGHTS, NOT BEING READ THEIR RIGHTS,  THREATEN AND BULLIED BY  DISTRICT ATTORNEYS LYING TO THEM WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF LEGAL COUNSEL  PRESENT THAT THEIR BAC TEST FROM THE NOTORIOUSLY CORRUPT EVIDENCE TAMPERING TDPSCFL IS 99.7 ‘CONFIDENCE LEVEL’ A TOTAL LIE IN HUCKSTERING  TDPSCD/P VICTIMS TO RELINQUISH gOD GIVEN VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL WITH A JURY WITH NON MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED BAC TDPSCF LAB SPURIOUS EVIDENCE, OR ANY OTHER TDPSCF LAB MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED AS POTENTIALLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER,  AND PLEA BARGAIN  GUILTY, OR IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE JOHN LOVETT INTIMIDATES  IN COURT AND SJC ASS. DA MARK BOEMIO  OUTSIDE OF  COURT BY SPURIOUS PLEA “BARGAIN” WITH NO LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE DUI DEFENDANT ALLOWED , PLEAD GUILTY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD OR YOU WILL BE FALSELY CONVICTED BY TRIAL EITHER BY LIED TO JURY AND ..OR PREJUDICED CORRUPTED JUDGE IN 100% OF CASES BY MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED TDPSFC LAB SPURIOUS BAC TEST REPORT RESULTS TO TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT  A  YEAR IN JAIL FOR 1STDUI AND  $10,000 DOLLAR FINE FOR REFUSAL TO BE DUPED AND DENIED JUSTICE AND RIGHT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  THIS HAPPENED IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE. THIS INJUSTICE WAS SUSTAINED BY THE MOCK MAY19TH, MC COURT LAW FIVE ORDER TO DISMISS FOR FOR JUSTICE CYNICAL RUSE IN TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE  IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.

 

TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  WILL NOT TAKE NO UNDER ANY CONDITION, AT ANY TIME, FOR ANY REASON FOR AN ANSWER, IN REGARDS TO PIRATING TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD’S VICTIMS BLOOD IN SPITE OF SIGNED  BAC REFUSAL SINE QUA NON.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, IF FOR REFUSAL OR ANY REASON WHAT SO EVER-INCLUDING NO PROBABLY CAUSE OF +.08 BAC- BLOOD SAMPLES WERE NOT PIRATED IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IN EVEN ONE CASE, LIKE THE APPELLANT’S CASE,  THIS  ENTIRE TDPS COMMISSIONERS’ MONEY SCAMMING CASH COW,  WOULD BE EXPOSED AND  COLLAPSED BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SUIT,  IF EVEN ONE BAC TEST CAME BACK BELOW .O8. AFTER ROUTINELY JAILING ALL DUI SUSPECTS ON INSTANTER IN TEXAS.  PRACTICALLY ALL OF THE BAC TEST REPORTS COME BACK AT .2. NOT ONE HAS EVER COME BACK BELOW BAC .15 FROM THE LAB AND WHEN OBVIOUS SPURIOUS TDPSFC LAB BAC REPORT WITH A REASONABLE DOUBT IS CONTESTED ONCE, AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE,   IN UNIVERSAL VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW THE TDPSCFL DOES NOT PERMIT RETESTING BY THEIR REPORT UNDERSIGNING BAC TDPSCF LAB BAC TECHNICIANS IN SUPPRESSION OF EXONERATING EVIDENCE. THE APPELLANT’S CASE IS REPRESENTATIVE IS THAT JUST ONE INSTANCE WHERE A TDPSCD/P VICTIM HAS FOUGHT FOR ALL VICTIMS AGAINST THE RAVAGES AND PIRATING OF NOTHING BUT A STATE WIDE MONEY MAKING SCAM BY THE TDPSCOMMISIONERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH LOCAL CRIMINAL JUDGES LIKE JOHN LOVETT AND THE SJC DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE

 

FAILURE BY THE COURT WITH JUDICIAL STANDING TO GRANT IN APPEAL APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS RE: MAY 19TH SPURIOUS COURT ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUDGEMENT AND SAID SAME COURT TO GRANT IN SAID APPEAL BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS THE APPELLANT’S AB INITIO  MAY 19TH HEARING MOTION TO DISMISS CHARGES  ET. AL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, JUST AS GOVERNOR ABBOTT’S OFFICE FAILURE TO CERTIFY AS GOVERNOR THE RES IPSO FACTO DISQUALIFICATION OF A JUDGE MOTION BY THE APPELLANT 2/23/17, IN A JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD BY SAID MOCK MAY 19TH COURT ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE SUSTAINS JOHN LOVETT AND CO-CONSPIRATORS UNABATED BY THE MAY 19TH DISMISSAL FOR JUSTICE RUSE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE TO PERPETRATE THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD UNDER OF COLOR OF LAW DEFRAUDING, PIRATING THEIR BLOOD, AND AS DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE CONSTITUTION DESTROYING THE CIVIL AND GOD GIVEN RIGHTS OF OVER TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND IN TEXAS A YEAR, UNLAWFULLY CONFISCATING THEIR DRIVERS LICENCE  AND STATE LEGAL IDENTIFICATION, THE SAME THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAU.  THE 2003 SAFE DRIVING PROGRAM, BY SAID LAW WARRANT’S ONLY CDL, NOT CLASS C/M DRIVER’S LICENSE TO BE SUSPENDED  AND YET ALMOST 96% OF LICENSES CONFISCATED  ARE CLASS C, COMPLETELY OUTSIDE THE UNCONSTITUITIONAL 2003 LAW’S DOMAIN. DOUBLE JEOPARDY SURCHARGES ARE THEN EXTORTED UNDER THREAT OF JAILING FOR DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID IF BEING SANCTIONED A SECOND TIME FOR THE SAME OFFENSE, $125. SURCHARGE IS NOT PAID TO THE TDPS IN ORDER TO HAVE SAID DRIVER’S LICENSE RETURNED AFTER THE AB INITIO SUSPENSION  SANCTION IS SERVED.

 

THE TEXAS PENAL STATE FOSTERED BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, UTILIZES RURAL JAILS AS ANOTHER REVENUE STREAM.  THE SJC JAIL- BUILT BY SHERIFF HUMPY PARKER DURING “HUMPY’S” THREE DECADE LONG REIGN OF TERROR AND MURDER IN SJC IS A PRIME EXAMPLE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE. THE SAME SJC COURT ENABLED HUMPY, ENABLES JOHN LOVETT TO JAIL THE APPELLANT IN SAID SAME SJCJ, AND IN SPITE OF THE MOCK MAY 19TH, 2017  MC COURT RUSE ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICES, VIA OUTSTANDING CASE WARRANT AND SPECIOUS PROBATION VIOLATION, BY COURT ORDER OF  JOHN LOVETT AND OF  WAYNE MACK UNABATED BY MOCK MAY 19TH COURT ORDER IS NONETHELESS IN TENT TO JAIL FALSELY THE APPELLANT PRO SE IN MCJ INDEFINITELY AND HUMPY’S SJC JAIL FOR 365 DAYS WITH NO PROBATION.

 

THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD MAKES MONEY VIA VICTIM’S  TAX PAYER MONEY  PAID TO COUNTY JAILS LIKE MCJ AND SJC IN JAILING INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY AMERICAN CITIZENS IN FALSE DUI AND POM ARREST WITH NO NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE (DUI) BEYOND FALLACIOUS TESTIMONY BY ARRESTING OFFICERS WHO OUNCE THEY ISSUE INSTANTER MUST YIELD IN EVERY CASE A GUILTY DUI CONVICTION AT +.15 BAC OR BE SUED PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION I.E. MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE AND FALSE JAILING.  BAC BLOOD SAMPLE “REFUSAL” IS PUNISHABLE BY 180 CONFISCATION OF LICENSE, AND IF ONE, AS APPELLANT DID REFUSES IN EXERCISE OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND GENEVA RIGHTS,  BLOOD IS VIOLENTLY PIRATED NONETHELESS TO SAFE GUARD AND PERPETUATE THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD AND INSURE BY BLOOD SAMPLE AS LAB PROP TRIGGERED TDPSCF LAB SELF VERIFIED BAC TESTS GUILTY OF CLASS A MISDEMEANOR, OR DUI STATE FELONY  ENHANCED BY +.08  DUI.  NO REFUSAL! BLOOD SAMPLES  MUST BE PIRATED  IN THE COMMISSION OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD IN 100% OF ALL CASES TO TRIGGER AS TDPSCF LAB PROPS 100% FRAUDULENT BAC TEST REPORTS AND COME BACK AFTER THE BLOOD SAMPLE, POTENTIALLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE AT .O8 AND -.15 HAS BEEN SUPPRESSED FOR A MONTH OR SO IN THE CUSTODY OF THE TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY.  ALMOST 98% OF SAID MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE BAC TEST REPORTS BECAUSE OF HARRIS COUNTY LAB BACK LOG STATE BAC .2,  AT A FRAUDULENT 99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL.  WITH SAID MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED BAC BLOOD SAMPLE PROPPED REPORTS, 98 %  OF PEOPLE IN TEXAS WHO CANNOT AFFORD THE $15,000 DUI ATTORNEY EXTORTION, ARE CONNED BY UNSCRUPULOUS, LYING ASS DA’S LIKE MARK BOEMIO INTO A PLEA PHONY “BARGAIN” GUILTY CONVICTION OF DUI CLASS A MISDEMEANOR ENHANCED INCRIMINATED AND CONVICTED BY A SPURIOUS .+ 15 BAC LEVEL REPORTED IN A TDPSCF LAB SELF VALIDATING BAC REPORT.

 

ALL SAID FRAUD AND PIRATING IN PROMOTION OF THE TDPS FIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD. SAID TDPS COMMISSIONERS APPOINTED FOR SIX YEARS WITHOUT SALARY BY GOVERNOR ABBOT IN AN APPARENT MUTUAL CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH THE FACADE OF PROMOTING GOVERNMENT/POLICE PIRATING VIA THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD IN THE NAME OF BOGUS, FRAUDULENT CHARITY CREATED AND DOMINEERED BY ORGANIZED CRIME LIKE TILMAN FERTITA’S HUNDRED CLUB, AND FR. MACIEL’S LEGION OF CHRIST SFC CARLOS SLIM HELU TRAFFICKING MONEY LAUNDERING ACCOUNT AT THE INSTITUTE FOR RELIGIOUS WORKS IN ROME, I.E. THE ROTHSCHILD VATICAN BANK THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS. DEFRAUD AND VIOLATE EVERY ONE IN TEXAS CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW AND FOR PROFIT JAILING THEM  SUPPRESSING POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE WHILE THEY ARE STILL ASSUMED TO BE INNOCENT FOR 72 HOURS TO PIRATE REVENUE FROM THE FALSEJAILING.

 

 

THE 2003 TDP SAFE DRIVING PROGRAM LAW CONFISCATED THROUGH A CIVIL PROPERTY THE APPELANT’S DRIVER’S LICENSE FOR WRITTEN REFUSAL FOR 180 DAYS LEAVING THE APPELANT DEVOID OF HIS TEXAS ID.  MOREOVER HIS CDL AND CHARGES 125 AFTER NINETY DAYS TO GET IT BACK,  PLUS DPS SURCHARGES FOR DUI CONVICTION- ALL DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION- BUT IT IS FOR A GOOD END- THE ALLEGEDLY GOOD END JUSTIFIES EVEN AN EVIL MEANS.  THE ALLEGED GOOD AND CHARITABLE END  TO FUND TRAUMA HOSPITALS LIKE CHI-ST. LUKE AND ROAD IMPROVEMENT.  EXCEPT FOR BEING PAID AS A DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE CONSTITUTION TO PIRATE BLOOD SAMPLES IN THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, CARDINAL DINARDO’S CHI ST. LUKE DOES NOT, NOR OTHER TRAUMA UNITS DO NOT RECEIVE ANY PROCEEDS FROM THE  TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM  REVENUE/ FRAUD CASH COW SCAM AND RAPE OF TEXAS VOTERS, NOR IS THEIR ANY PUBLIC MONEY TRAIL OF THIS 2.5 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR FROM THIS SCAM,  FUNDING IN ANYWAY TEXAS ROADWAYS.  THE HEAD COMMISSIONER OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, TILMAN FERTITA IS ALSO HEAD OF THE HUNDRED CLUB, AS SUCH THE THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD IS CONTROL BY AND IS A TENTACLE OF ORGANIZED CRIME IN TEXAS AND MEXICO.

 

MOST IMPORTANTLY, TDPS AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IS SO COMPLETELY ABSORBED AND ADDICTED TO MONEY AND POWER BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD THAT BESIDES TURNING A BLIND EYE TO 100 CLUB STICKER MEMBERS IN ENFORCEMENT OF THIS SCAM, NO INVESTIGATION, ARRESTS, CONVICTION BY TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT ON ANY LEVEL HAVE EVER BEEN MADE FOR FERTITA SYNDICATE/SFC CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING, DRUG SHIPMENT, AND ARMS DEALING ALONG THE I-10 AND UP AND DOWN THE I-59-69 THE PRIME TRAFFICKING ROUTES FOR CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING, DRUG SHIPMENT AND ARMS DEALING BY THE FERTITA SYNDICATE IN TANDEM WITH THE BUSH/CLINTON/ BARAK/ CARLOS SLIM HELU- FR. MACIEL DEGOLADO/JPII SINOLOA FEDERATION CARTEL.

 

AS A DEEPLY CONCERNED AMERICAN PATRIOT AND CATHOLIC PRIEST AND DOMINICAN RELIGIOUS EVEN IF PERSONALLY AM DENIED AGAIN JUSTICE IN THIS CAUSE, I FIRST AND FOREMOST DEMAND SAID HONORABLE JUDGE TOFOR THESE CHILDREN TO INPANEL A STATE GRAND JURY TO INVESTIGATE THIS ORGANIZED CRIME RACKET THAT HAS CONTROL OF OUR GOVERNMENT AND STATE LAW ENFORCEMENTT VIA THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD .

 

DEUS  PROVIDEBIT!

 

The Myth of the Kindly General Lee/Rotheschilds Bankroll Atlantic Slave Trade and Southern Poverty Law Center

I like Gorge Washington utterly detest the American Illuminati Thomas Jefferson  who in turn framed Robert E.  Lee’s phony self serving   “White Man’s Burden” out look on racism based  Black Slavery.  Jefferson was the first person to base slavery not on war. but race.  But this is the greatest treason, to do the right thing for the wrong reason.  Neither  Jefferson or Lee, a fourth  rate general,  and like Jefferson, a monstrous  hypocritical  white supremacist slave owner, who to make money broke up the black family “breeding” human beings like cattle,  deserves  a monument in any place of honor if the truth be known.  But these monuments in New Orleans and Charlottesville,  though understandably removed, are being removed wrongly to provoke division in America First  by NWO/Is R Hell Firster  Rotheschild agents via George Soros like the CIA/Antifa/ Ukraine Atlantic Council tied Neo Nazis, The Clinton/Bush-Dem/Repub establishment. The Rotheschilds bankrolled the Atlantic Slavery Trade as well as the Masonic Ku Klux Klan and today the ADL puppetted Southern Poverty Law Center and Blacks Lives Matter.  The Rotheschild were behind the 40% tax on cotton threatening to destroy the agrarian South and subject it to Northern  New York Banksters like Ukraine today.  When Lincoln rejected war loans from the Rotheschild at 37% interest and printed Greenbacks lent to the American People without interest, the Rotheschild had him, like JFK for Silver Certificates shot in the head and killed. The Rotheschild as always attempted to bankroll all  sides in the Civil War in an attempt, like Charlottesville , or Syria to take bankster controll of the troublesome American Republic by divide and conquer and balkanization.

The Myth of the Kindly General Lee

The legend of the Confederate leader’s heroism and decency is based in the fiction of a person who never existed.

Jonathan Bachman / Reuters
The strangest part about the continued personality cult of Robert E. Lee is how few of the qualities his admirers profess to see in him he actually possessed.

Memorial Day has the tendency to conjure up old arguments about the Civil War. That’s understandable; it was created to mourn the dead of a war in which the Union was nearly destroyed, when half the country rose up in rebellion in defense of slavery. This year, the removal of Lee’s statue in New Orleans has inspired a new round of commentary about Lee, not to mention protests on his behalf by white supremacists.

The myth of Lee goes something like this: He was a brilliant strategist and devoted Christian man who abhorred slavery and labored tirelessly after the war to bring the country back together.

There is little truth in this. Lee was a devout Christian, and historians regard him as an accomplished tactician. But despite his ability to win individual battles, his decision to fight a conventional war against the more densely populated and industrialized North is considered by many historians to have been a fatal strategic error.

But even if one conceded Lee’s military prowess, he would still be responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans in defense of the South’s authority to own millions of human beings as property because they are black. Lee’s elevation is a key part of a 150-year-old propaganda campaign designed to erase slavery as the cause of the war and whitewash the Confederate cause as a noble one. That ideology is known as the Lost Cause, and as historian David Blight writes, it provided a “foundation on which Southerners built the Jim Crow system.”

There are unwitting victims of this campaign—those who lack the knowledge to separate history from sentiment. Then there are those whose reverence for Lee relies on replacing the actual Lee with a mythical figure who never truly existed.

In the Richmond Times Dispatch, R. David Cox wrote that “For white supremacist protesters to invoke his name violates Lee’s most fundamental convictions.” In the conservative publication Townhall,  Jack Kerwick concluded that Lee was “among the finest human beings that has ever walked the Earth.” John Daniel Davidson, in an essay for The Federalist, opposed the removal of the Lee statute in part on the grounds that Lee “arguably did more than anyone to unite the country after the war and bind up its wounds.” Praise for Lee of this sort has flowed forth from past historians and presidents alike.

This is too divorced from Lee’s actual life to even be classed as fan fiction; it is simply historical illiteracy.

White supremacy does not “violate” Lee’s “most fundamental convictions.” White supremacy was one of Lee’s most fundamental convictions.

Lee was a slaveowner—his own views on slavery were explicated in an 1856 letter that it often misquoted to give the impression that Lee was some kind of an abolitionist. In the letter, he describes slavery as “a moral & political evil,” but goes on to explain that:

I think it however a greater evil to the white man than to the black race, & while my feelings are strongly enlisted in behalf of the latter, my sympathies are more strong for the former. The blacks are immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, socially & physically. The painful discipline they are undergoing, is necessary for their instruction as a race, & I hope will prepare & lead them to better things. How long their subjugation may be necessary is known & ordered by a wise Merciful Providence. Their emancipation will sooner result from the mild & melting influence of Christianity, than the storms & tempests of fiery Controversy.

The argument here is that slavery is bad for white people, good for black people, and most importantly, it is better than abolitionism; emancipation must wait for divine intervention. That black people might not want to be slaves does not enter into the equation; their opinion on the subject of their own bondage is not even an afterthought to Lee.

Lee’s cruelty as a slavemaster was not confined to physical punishment. In Reading the Man, the historian Elizabeth Brown Pryor’s portrait of Lee through his writings, Pryor writes that “Lee ruptured the Washington and Custis tradition of respecting slave families,” by hiring them off to other plantations, and that “by 1860 he had broken up every family but one on the estate, some of whom had been together since Mount Vernon days.” The separation of slave families was one of the most unfathomably devastating aspects of slavery, and Pryor wrote that Lee’s slaves regarded him as “the worst man I ever see.”

The trauma of rupturing families lasted lifetimes for the enslaved—it was, as my colleague Ta-Nehisi Coates described it, “a kind of murder.” After the war, thousands of the emancipated searched desperately for kin lost to the market for human flesh, fruitlessly for most. In Reconstruction, the historian Eric Foner quotes a Freedmen’s Bureau agent who notes of the emancipated, “in their eyes, the work of emancipation was incomplete until the families which had been dispersed by slavery were reunited.”

Lee’s heavy hand on the Arlington plantation, Pryor writes, nearly led to a slave revolt, in part because the enslaved had been expected to be freed upon their previous master’s death, and Lee had engaged in a dubious legal interpretation of his will in order to keep them as his property, one that lasted until a Virginia court forced him to free them.

When two of his slaves escaped and were recaptured, Lee either beat them himself or ordered the overseer to “lay it on well.” Wesley Norris, one of the slaves who was whipped, recalled that “not satisfied with simply lacerating our naked flesh, Gen. Lee then ordered the overseer to thoroughly wash our backs with brine, which was done.”

Every state that seceded mentioned slavery as the cause in their declarations of secession. Lee’s beloved Virginia was no different, accusing the federal government of “perverting” its powers “not only to the injury of the people of Virginia, but to the oppression of the Southern Slaveholding States.” Lee’s decision to fight for the South can only be described as a choice to fight for the continued existence of human bondage in America—even though for the Union, it was not at first a war for emancipation.

During his invasion of Pennsylvania, Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia enslaved free blacks and brought them back to the South as property. Pryor writes that “evidence links virtually every infantry and cavalry unit in Lee’s army” with the abduction of free black Americans, “with the activity under the supervision of senior officers.”

Soldiers under Lee’s command at the Battle of the Crater in 1864 massacred black Union soldiers who tried to surrender. Then, in a spectacle hatched by Lee’s senior corps commander A.P. Hill, the Confederates paraded the Union survivors through the streets of Petersburg to the slurs and jeers of the southern crowd. Lee never discouraged such behavior. As the historian Richard Slotkin wrote in No Quarter: The Battle of the Crater, “his silence was permissive.”

The presence of black soldiers on the field of battle shattered every myth the South’s slave empire was built on: the happy docility of slaves, their intellectual inferiority, their cowardice, their inability to compete with whites. As Pryor writes, “fighting against brave and competent African Americans challenged every underlying tenet of southern society.” The Confederate response to this challenge was to visit every possible atrocity and cruelty upon black soldiers whenever possible, from enslavement to execution.

As the historian James McPherson recounts in Battle Cry of Freedom, in October of that same year, Lee proposed an exchange of prisoners with the Union general Ulysses S. Grant. “Grant agreed, on condition that blacks be exchanged ‘the same as white soldiers.’” Lee’s response was that “negroes belonging to our citizens are not considered subjects of exchange and were not included in my proposition.” Because slavery was the cause for which Lee fought, he could hardly be expected to easily concede, even at the cost of the freedom of his own men, that blacks could be treated as soldiers and not things. Grant refused the offer, telling Lee that “Government is bound to secure to all persons received into her armies the rights due to soldiers.” Despite its desperate need for soldiers, the Confederacy did not relent from this position until a few months before Lee’s surrender.

After the war, Lee did counsel defeated southerners against rising up against the North. Lee might have become a rebel once more, and urged the South to resume fighting—as many of his former comrades wanted him to. But even in this task Grant, in 1866, regarded his former rival as falling short, saying that Lee was “setting an example of forced acquiescence so grudging and pernicious in its effects as to be hardly realized.”

Nor did Lee’s defeat lead to an embrace of racial egalitarianism. The war was not about slavery, Lee insisted later, but if it was about slavery, it was only out of Christian devotion that white southerners fought to keep blacks enslaved. Lee told a New York Herald reporter, in the midst of arguing in favor of somehow removing blacks from the South (“disposed of,” in his words), “that unless some humane course is adopted, based on wisdom and Christian principles you do a gross wrong and injustice to the whole negro race in setting them free. And it is only this consideration that has led the wisdom, intelligence and Christianity of the South to support and defend the institution up to this time.”

Lee had beaten or ordered his own slaves to be beaten for the crime of wanting to be free, he fought for the preservation of slavery, his army kidnapped free blacks at gunpoint and made them unfree—but all of this, he insisted, had occurred only because of the great Christian love the South held for blacks. Here we truly understand Frederick Douglass’s admonition that “between the Christianity of this land and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the widest possible difference.”

Privately, according to the correspondence collected by his own family, Lee counseled others to hire white labor instead of the freedmen, observing “that wherever you find the negro, everything is going down around him, and wherever you find a white man, you see everything around him improving.”

In another letter, Lee wrote “You will never prosper with blacks, and it is abhorrent to a reflecting mind to be supporting and cherishing those who are plotting and working for your injury, and all of whose sympathies and associations are antagonistic to yours. I wish them no evil in the world—on the contrary, will do them every good in my power, and know that they are misled by those to whom they have given their confidence; but our material, social, and political interests are naturally with the whites.”

Publicly, Lee argued against the enfranchisement of blacks, and raged against Republican efforts to enforce racial equality on the South. Lee told Congress that blacks lacked the intellectual capacity of whites and “could not vote intelligently,” and that granting them suffrage would “excite unfriendly feelings between the two races.” Lee explained that “the negroes have neither the intelligence nor the other qualifications which are necessary to make them safe depositories of political power.” To the extent that Lee believed in reconciliation, it was between white people, and only on the precondition that black people would be denied political power and therefore the ability to shape their own fate.

Lee is not remembered as an educator, but his life as president of Washington College (later Washington and Lee) is tainted as well. According to Pryor, students at Washington formed their own chapter of the KKK, and were known by the local Freedmen’s Bureau to attempt to abduct and rape black schoolgirls from the nearby black schools.

There were at least two attempted lynchings by Washington students during Lee’s tenure, and Pryor writes that “the number of accusations against Washington College boys indicates that he either punished the racial harassment more laxly than other misdemeanors, or turned a blind eye to it,” adding that he “did not exercise the near imperial control he had at the school, as he did for more trivial matters, such as when the boys threatened to take unofficial Christmas holidays.” In short, Lee was as indifferent to crimes of violence toward blacks carried out by his students as he was when they were carried out by his soldiers.

Lee died in 1870, as Democrats and ex-Confederates were commencing a wave of terrorist violence that would ultimately reimpose their domination over the Southern states. The Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1866; there is no evidence Lee ever spoke up against it. On the contrary, he darkly intimated in his interview with the Herald that the South might be moved to violence again if peace did not proceed on its terms. That was prescient.

Lee is a pivotal figure in American history worthy of study. Neither the man who really existed, nor the fictionalized tragic hero of the Lost Cause, are heroes worthy of a statue in a place of honor. As one Union veteran angrily put it in 1903 when Pennsylvania was considering placing a statute to Lee at Gettysburg, “If you want historical accuracy as your excuse, then place upon this field a statue of Lee holding in his hand the banner under which he fought, bearing the legend: ‘We wage this war against a government conceived in liberty and dedicated to humanity.’” The most fitting monument to Lee is the national military cemetery the federal government placed on the grounds of his former home in Arlington.

To describe this man as an American hero requires ignoring the immense suffering for which he was personally responsible, both on and off the battlefield. It requires ignoring his participation in the industry of human bondage, his betrayal of his country in defense of that institution, the battlefields scattered with the lifeless bodies of men who followed his orders and those they killed, his hostility toward the rights of the freedmen and his indifference to his own students waging a campaign of terror against the newly emancipated. It requires reducing the sum of human virtue to a sense of decorum and the ability to convey gravitas in a gray uniform.

There are former Confederates who sought to redeem themselves—one thinks of James Longstreet, wrongly blamed by Lost Causers for Lee’s disastrous defeat at Gettysburg, who went from fighting the Union army to leading New Orleans’s integrated police force in battle against white supremacist paramilitaries. But there are no statues of Longstreet in New Orleans.* Lee was devoted to defending the principle of white supremacy; Longstreet was not. This, perhaps, is why Lee was placed atop the largest Confederate monument at Gettysburg in 1917,  but the 6-foot-2-inch Longstreet had to wait until 1998 to receive a smaller-scale statue hidden in the woods that makes him look like a hobbit riding a donkey. It’s why Lee is remembered as a hero, and Longstreet is remembered as a disgrace.

The white supremacists who have protested on Lee’s behalf are not betraying his legacy. In fact, they have every reason to admire him. Lee, whose devotion to white supremacy outshone his loyalty to his country, is the embodiment of everything they stand for. Tribe and race over country is the core of white nationalism, and racists can embrace Lee in good conscience.

The question is why anyone else would.


* This article originally stated that there are no statues of Longstreet in the American South; in fact, there is one in his hometown of Gainesville, Georgia. We regret the error.

About the Author

IV. CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS BY THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, EXPUNGE CRIMINAL RECORD AND BE PAID BY THE HOUR FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ALL HARM DONE PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

NOTICE OF APPEAL IN PETITION OF WRIT OF

                                       MANDAMUS

                     (TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE)

 

                                                 IN

 

                      MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS

                         DISTRICT COURT, AT LAW FIVE

 

 

                                     RE:  NO. 17-322548

 

 MAY 19, 2017, COURT ORDER TO DISMISS INTEREST OF

    JUSTICE      -DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID-

 

ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT SAID ABOVE ENTITLED AND NUMBERED CAUSE BE

AND THE SAME IS HEREBY DISMISSED

 

APPELLANT AND PETITIONER

 

FATHER CHRISTOPHER TERRY, O.P.

                         THE ORDER OF PREACHERS

 

PRAYS

 

      THE HONORABLE JUDGE KATHLEEN HAMILTON

                                        BOARD OF JUDGES

 

                  MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS,

    DISTRICT COUNTY COURT 359TH, DISTRICT COURT

    2017 W. PHILLIPS, STE. 305, CONROE, TEXAS 77301 2874:

 

                    AND OR ALL HONORABLE JUDGES

 

WITH CONSTITUTIONALSTATE/DISTRICT/AND COUNTY JUDICIAL STANDING TO HEAR SAID APPEAL AND PETITION FOR COURT ORDER BY MANDAMUS BY SAID PLAINTIFF, FATHER CHRISTOPHER TERRY, O.P.

 

                                                     

 

 

Court Clerk/Coordinator: Susan Mitchell, Court Coordinator  (Montgomery County)
Court Address: 359th District Court
207 W Phillips, STE. 305
Conroe, Texas 77301 2874
    Phone: 936.539.7900
936.538.8187 Fax: 936.538.8187

 

 ABSTRACT

 

 

 

  • APPELLANT PRO SE AND PETITIONER WRIT OF MANDAMUS, FATHER CHRISTOPHER DANIEL TERRY O.P. MAKES MOTION IN APPEAL AND PETITIONS WRIT OF MANDAMUS RE: CASE NO. 17-322548, MAY19, 2017, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, AT LAW FIVE, CONROE, TEXAS, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE SAID CASE (EXHIBIT 1: SAID MAY 19TH 2017, COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE )

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, APPELLANT PRO SE AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS PETITIONER, SAID FR. CHRISTOPHER DANIEL TERRY, O.P. PRAYS IN APPEAL SAID HONORABLE JUDGE OR JUDGES WITH JUDICIAL STANDING   RE: CASE NO. 17-322548, MAY 19, 2017, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, AT LAW FIVE, CONROE, TEXAS, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO SAID  COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE SAID CASE, BE, ADJUDICATED BY HONORABLE JUDGE DE FACTO NULL AND VOID PERCAUSAM MISTRIAL VIA WRIT OF MANDAMUS  RECALLED, REPEALED, AND REPLACED BY SAID HONORABLE JUDGE IN SUMMARY JUDGEMENT OF SAID CASE BY MANDAMUS COURT ORDER TO DIMISS ALL CHARGES, ET AL IN SAID CASE AND ALL OUTSTANDING ESTOPPEL THERE OF. “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” PER CAUSAM MAILICIOUS PROSECUTION PURSUANT OF JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR THE APPELLANT UNJUSTLY BELEAGURED IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY NEVER THE LESS DUE TO SAID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF FOR JUSTICE BEING MERELY AN UNLAWFUL RUSE BY SAID COURT TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE AND DENY EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ALL OTHER HARM DONE, THEREBY. SAID MAY 19TH, COURT ORDER TO DIMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE IN SUPPRESSING FROM SAID HEARING, MAY 19, 2017, ONE OF THE AB INITIO ENHANCING SPURIOUS CHARGES OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION RES IPSO. IGITUR, IS LEGALLY DEFICIENT AND SAID SPURIOUS ENHANCING CHARGE WAS NOT PROMULGATED PUBLICLY AND OFFICALLY, NOR RECORDED IN SAID COURT RECORD, AS SUCH NULL AND VOID, WITHOUT FORCE OF LAW IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, AND IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE DENYING THE APPELLANT EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT BY SUPPRESSION OF EXONERATING COURT DOCUMENTS EVIDENCE VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF SAID COURT OF THE APPELLANT.

 

 

2) RES IPSO, IGITUR SAID APPELLANT PRAYS SAID HONORABLE JUDGE GIVING SAID HEARING IN MONTGOMERY COURT  RE: CASE NO. 17-322548, MAY 19, 2017, MONTGOMERY COUNT COURT, LAW FIVE CONROE, TEXAS,  ACTING  AS JUDGE DAMICO  COURT ORDERED TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE SAID CASE FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE KATHLEEN HAMILTON (AND OR JUDGES HAVING CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT  JUDICIAL STANDING IN SAID CASE TO HEAR SAID APPEAL AND GRANT PETITION  WRIT OF MANDAMUS IN SAID CASE NO. 17-322548, MAY19, 2017 AND TO UPHOLD  APPELLANT’S  AB INITIO MOTION NOT GIVEN A HEARING MAY 19TH, 2017   IN SAID CASE,  BY SAID COURT AND JUDGE IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.  RES IPSO, IGITUR, THROW OUT SAID FORMER NULL AND VOID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE  VIA WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND IN SUMMARY JUDGEMENT RATIFIED BY THE APPELLANT  SAID HONORABLE JUDGE WITH JUDICIAL STANDING ORDER BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS  OF APPELLANT’S INTENDED, BUT DENIED IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, AB INTIO MOTION FOR HEARING MAY 19TH, 2017,   TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  ALL CHARGES, CONVICTIONS, SENTENCING, FINES, AND PROBATION, AND EXPUNGE CRIMINAL RECORD, AGAIN PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION UNDER COLOR OF LAW  IN VIOLATION OF APPELLANT PRO SE’S VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS  IN SAID CASE NO. 17-322548, BY SAID MAY 19TH DELICT NULL AND VOID COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE WHICH, BEING A RUSE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE TO DENY THE APPELLANT JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, HAS THEREBY MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTED THE APPELLANT, AND PLACED THE APPELLANT THROUGH SAID NULL AND VOID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER IN CONTINUOUS DOUBLE JEOPARDY PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AS CONTINUOUS WARRANTS FOR THE APPELLANT’S ARREST AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT HAVE BEEN ORDERED AFTER MAY 19TH, NULL AND VOID SAID COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

 

 

                                        3)  ESTOPPEL IN SAID APPEAL

 

 SAID CASE NO. 17-322548 AN ESTOPPEL RE: PRECEDENT TORT: SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT CAUSE NO. 2016-215-APRIL 4TH, 2016 1ST DUI + .15 BAC ENHANCED TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR-  2/23/17 “FALSE” THE APPELLANT BY SAID APPEAL  VOLO CONTENDERE sic volo te tibi persuadere, CONVICTION OF THE APPELLANT AND SENTENCING AND PROBATION ORDER BY SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT, APRIL 6TH, 2017,   AN ESTOPPEL AND PRECEDENT TORT RE: NO. 1CC18542 DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID-DL-CONVICTION  3/13/2017 IN THE JUSTICE COURT PCT. 01, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS, JUDGE WAYNE L. MACK, ESTOPPEL REGARDING  SAID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

 

                                            4) FACTUAL GROUNDS

 

PURSUANT OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN DENYING BY SAID MAY 19TH RUSE EQUITABLE REDRESS AND DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ALL CHARGES, ET AL PER   CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY SAID MC COURT, IN LAW FIVE JUDGE, IS IN CONTINUOUS VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS MAROONING THE APPELLANT IN CONTINUOUS DOUPLE JEOPARDY. RES IPSO IGITUR, THE GROUNDS FOR THE APPELLANT IN APPEAL PURSUANT OF  RELIEF FROM SAID “RUSE” MAY 19TH, 2017 COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE DIRECTED TO SAID COURT AND HONORABLE JUDGE AND TO PETITION WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS SHOWN IN LEGAL BRIEF VIA  EVIDENTIARY AND EXONERATING  SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT DOCUMENTS AND DELICT AND INVALID WARRANTS AND SPURIOUS PROBATION ORDERS BY ONE, JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, (ACTING ONLY AS A LEGAL PERSON) BUT VIA THE SAN JACINTO COUNTY DISTRICT COURT (SJCC) MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTING THE APPELLANT CONTINUOUSLY DUE TO SAID MAY 19TH RUSE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.  

 

 

 

                                                         4) COLLUSSION

 

MAY 13TH, 2017 AB INITIO ARRESTING AND JAILING CHARGES LEVELED  AGAINST THE APPELLANT BY THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF’S  DEPARTMENT  ARE 1: DRIVING WHILE LICENSE  INVALID  AND 2: ENHANCED BY VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION THEREBY. SAID ENHANCING CHARGE, VIOLATION OF AN ABSURDLY OBVIOUS PRIMA FACIA SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, WITH NO CONSTITUTIONAL/ STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING AB INITIO IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE, WAS UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSED AS EXONERATING EVIDENCE FOR PUBLIC HEARING BY SAID MAY 19TH, 2017 MCC ASS. DA.  MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE BY SAID RUSE MAY 19TH ORDER, SOLELY  1.) THE AB INITIO (MAY 13TH, 2017) CHARGE, DRIVING WHILE LICENSE IN VALID, MEANWHILE IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, SAID MAY 19TH MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE BY MCC ASS. DISTRICT ATTORNEY UNLAWFULLY AND MALICIOUSLY SUPPRESSED FROM A PUBLIC HEARING IN A COURT OF LAW THE AB INITIO OBVIOUSLY ABSURD PRIMA FACIE SPURIOUS ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING AS SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGE IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE TO BE SHOWN.

 

SAID UNLAWFULL SUPPRESSION OF NO.2 SOLELY, FROM PUBLIC HEARING IN A COURT OF LAW VIOLATES THE APPELLANT’S VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO MAKE MOTION AT ANY TIME IN COURT PROCEEDINGS TO DISMISS “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” ALL CHARGES ET AL. PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, MAKE PLEA OF INNOCENCE,  TO BE EXONERATED BY ALL KNOWN EVIDENCE NOT TO BE WITH HELD AND SUPPRESSED BY THE STATE’S PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT, TO FACE ACCUSERS (JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES) AND ALL CHARGES IN A PUBLIC AND CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL BEFORE A JURY OF PEERS AND A JURISPRUDENTA  JUDGE  NOT RELIGIOUSLY BIGOTED, WITH NO MANIFEST JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT BY SAID SAME JUDGE AND COURT,  IN THE PROCEEDINGS AND OUTCOME. AND TO BE GIVEN IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE DUE  RELIEF FROM CONTINUOUS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY COURT IN EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR  FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ALL HARM DONE THEREBY TO THE APPELLANT  VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY SAID JUDGE AND COURT.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR SUBSEQUENT MAY 19TH COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE ONLY 1.) AND SUPPRESS UNLAWUFLLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE FROM THE HEARING IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT 2.)   TO THE CONTRARY, UNJUSTLY BY SAID SPURIOUS MC COURT ROOM RUSE DID UNLAWFULLY MAROON AFTER THE FACT APPELLANT IN CONTINUOUS DOUBLE JEOPARDY BY ALL SAID MALICIOUS ACCUSERS, SUBJECT TO DELICT AND INVALID WARRANTS, AND FALSE JAILINGS PURSUANT OF  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT IN THE COMMISSION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME, ALL FRUIT OF A POISONOUS TREE DERIVING FROM ALL SAID ESTOPPEL CASES: 1.) DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID, AND 2.) SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION VIOLATION.

 

 

                                             5) PRELIMINARY  MOTIONS

 

  1. SAID APPELLANT PRO SE MOTIONS FOR COURT ORDER OF PROTECTIONFROM CONTINUING MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT BY DELICT WARRANT AND SPURIOUS PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, FACILITATED BY SAID MAY 19TH .RUSE COURT ORDER TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.

 

  1.  FACTUAL BASIS FOR COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION

 

APRIL 4, 2016 THP6 TDPSHP DUI NSTANTER TX4KYLOUTI5U, (EXHIBIT) AND TDPS HPO BILLY CONLEY, JR. TX4KYLOUTI5U TDPS DUI OFFENSE REPORT STATES UNDER OATH IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001, A NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE OF MPM 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY. SAID NON EXISTENT MPM 450 1-59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY DUI OFFENSE SITE  SPURIOUSLY LINKS VIA MALICIOUS DUI PROSECUTION BY SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT AND SJC ACCOMPLICES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD,  THE APPELLANT TO SUPPRESSED BY TDPSFC LAB “BACK LOG,” EXONERATING EVIDENCE, IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE OF FALSE ARREST WITH NO PROBABLE CAUSE, THE APPELLANT’S  BLOOD SAMPLES PIRATED ON SAID APRIL 4TH, 2016 DATE BY DANNY VANDERMAN FOR TDPSC LAB UNDER CONTRACT  FOR TDPSFC LAB “BLOOD SAMPLE PROPS” TRIGGERING A FRAUDULENT SELF VERIFYING TDPSCF LAB ALCOHOL CONTENT LABORATORY REPORT, LABORATORY CASE NUMBER: HOU-1604-04344 ISSUED DATE: APRIL 25, 2016  MALICIOUSLY ATTRIBUTED TO THE APPELLANTLY OF  BAC .231  – ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT OF .O8 BAC- THE HIGHEST BAC LEVEL LISTED ON THE STANDARD BAC CHART- DUI, APRIL 4TH, 2016. SAID NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE OF MPM 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY.  IS A SPURIOUS ILLEGAL RUSE BY TDPSHPO TO FRAUDULENTLY ESTABLISH IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001, CRIMINAL JURISDICTION OVER THE APPELLANT FOR DUI IN SAN JACINTO COUT BY FEIGNED CONSTITUIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING  FOR SAN JACINTO COUNTY JUDGE JOHN LOVETT NON THROUGH FRAUD BY NON-EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE OF MPM 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY PURSUANT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD (TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  THE APPELLANT, THEREBY CAN NOT BE INCRIMINATED BY ANY PHYSICAL EVIDENCE DERIVING ALLEGEDLY FROM SAID NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE OF MPM 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY  ALBEIT  “OPEN CONTAINER” PLANTED EVIDENCE AND SPURIOUS BAC BLOOD SAMPLE TDPSCF LAB BOTH MANUFACTURED AND SUPRRESSED AS POTENTIALLLY EXONERATING, VIOLATING THEREBY IN THE STATE OF TEXAS IN ALL DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION THE DUI DEFENDANT’S  WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE FROM A FALLACIOUS NON EXISTENT OFFENSE SITE VIOLATES THE IVTH, VTH, VITH AMENDMENTS AND TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE.

 

SAID RUSE IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 BY BILLY CORLEY TO FEIGN JUDICIAL STANDING FOR SJCC AND JUDGE JOHN LOVETT IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION FOR DUI OF THE APPELLANT SWEARING TO A NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE IN SAN JACINTO COUNTY ON SAID DUI INSTANTER AND ON SAID DUI OFFENSE REPORT BY CORLEY IN VIOLATION OF FAA 1001 (EXHIBIT) CONSTITUTES A BREACH OF  CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/ DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING OF  JOHN LOVETT AS SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGE .

 

RES IPSO IGITUR   JOHN LOVETT AND ALL AFTER THE FACT ACOMPLICES IS BY SAID COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION ORDERED IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE TO CEASE AND DESIST IMMEDIATELY FROM CONTINUOUS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELANT AND FURTHER IMPERSONATING BY SJCC COURT ORDERS WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING IN THE APELLANT’S CAUSE,  A SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGE,  AND EVER ISSUING AS PERSONA SOL AGAIN, I.E. AS A  LEGAL PERSON SOLELY,  DELICT WARRANTS  AND SPURIOUS PROBATION ORDERS AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.   BY SAID COURT ORDER ALL ACCOMPLICES AFTER THE FACT OF JOHN LOVETT. PERSONA SOL, ARE ORDERED BY TSAID COURT TO CEASE AND DESIST – MONTGOMERY COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT- MC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SJC PROBATION DEPARTMENT RE: TRN 9160564229, APRIL 6TH 2017,,TDPS, JUDGE WAYNE MACK, JUSTICE COURT 1, MC COUNTY FROM CONTINUING TO UNLAWFULLY  ENFORCE ALL DELICT INVALID WARRANTS AND PROBATION ORDERS  BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, AGAINST THE APPELLANT  PURSUANT OF  THE APPELLANT’S FALSE ARREST AND UNLAWFUL JAILING PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, DERIVING FROM SAID ESTOPPEL SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT CAUSE NO. 2016-215- 2016 1ST DUI CAM 2/23/17  VOLO CONTENDERE FALSE CONVICTION, AND ILLEGAL IN ABSENTIA SENTENCING TO TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT FOR IST DUI AND PROBATION ORDER APRIL 6TH, 2017 BY SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING AS SHOWN BY SJCC RECORD DOCUMENT EVIDENCE (EXHIBIT).

 

 

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR,  SAID APPELLANT MAKES MOTION FOR COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION RE;  ESTOPPEL  NO. 1CC18542 DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID-DL- 4/13/2017 IN THE JUSTICE COURT PCT. 01, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS, JUDGE WAYNE L. MACK.ISSUING AND ENFORCING  ALL DELICT INVALID WARRANTS FOR FALSE ARREST AND UNLAWFUL JAILING OF THE APPELLANT UNDER “OUTSTANDING CASE” IN CONTEMPT OF MC COURT JUDGEMENT RE: ESTOPPEL CASE NO. 17-322548, MAY19, 2017, MOUNTGOMERY COUNT COURT, LAW FIVE,, CONROE, TEXAS, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO  (EXHIBIT) IN VIOLATION OF THE US CONSTITUTION’S DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE.

 

 

 

MOREOVER,  SAID APPELLANT MAKES MOTION FOR COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION  FROM RE: ALL DELICT WARRANTS FOR THE APPELLANT’S ARREST AND JAILING DERIVING FROM  A PRIMA FACIE  OBVIOUSLY ABSURD  SPECIOUSDEFERREDADJUDICATIONPROBATIONVIOLATIONS  UNCONSTITUTIONALLY SUPPRESSED AS EVIDENCE  EXONERATING THE APPELLENT BY SAID MAY 19TH MC COURT AT LAW FIVE RUSE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE AND DELETED FROM THE MAY 13TH AB INITIO CHARGES LEVELED  FALSELY AGAINST THE APPELLANT AND THEREBY AND UNCONSTITUTIONALLY  SAID EXONERATING AB INITIO CHARGE WAS NOT GIVEN A DUE PUBLIC HEARING IN A COURT OF LAW  NOR OFFICIALLY PROMULGATED IN SAID COURT RECORD ON MAY 19, 2016  IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S DUE PROCESS ET VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

 

SAID MAY 19TH MC COURT LAW FIVE ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE SET FORTH FOR HEARING IN COURT SOLELY  AB INITIO MAY 13TH CHARGE 1,)  DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID, AND SUPPRESSED UNLAWFULLY IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001  .2)  ENHANCING  CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION, AS A RESULT OF SAID SUPPRESSION AND DELETION OF .2) IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001,  IN PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 19TH, , SAID SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION  PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT CONTINUES IN FORCE, DE FACTO,  SAID SJC PROBATION DEPARTMENT DELICT WARRANT (EXHIBIT) FOR APPELLANT UNLAWFULLY DERIVES FROM FAILURE TO PAY PROBATION SURCHARGES-(EXHIBIT ) AND FAILURE TO ATTEND PROBATION MEETINGS RE: CAUSE NO. 2016-215- SJCC AND LOVETT, PERSONA SOL FEIGNING CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND JUDICIAL STANDING DERIVING  FROM A FRAUDULENT, SPURIOUS, IN NOMINE SOLO,  IN NAME ONLY EXISTENT DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION  ORDER BY SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT,(EXHIBIT).

 

CONTINUED DEMANDS BEFORE AND AFTER MAY 19 RUSE COURT ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE OF PAYMENT OF PROBATION FEES BY THE APPELLANT CONSTITUTES  UNLAWFUL AND FRAUDULENT  EXTORTION  PERPETRATED UNDER COLOR OF LAW BY  SJC CSCD TERESA MILNER DIRECTOR AND LOREINA KLEVINSKI IN CONTEMPT OF A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 04/29/2017 (EXHIBIT ) HOLDING JOHN LOVETT’S SJSCS PROBATION ORDER APRIL 6TH 2017 AND ALL WARRANTS AND ORDERS BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL TO BE NULL AND VOID BECAUSE OF BREACH OF JUDICIAL STANDING BY LOVETT AND SJCC ACCOPLICES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD. SAID FRAUD IS EVIDENT IN  FALLACIOUS DATE OF  1ST DUI OFFENSE IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 SWORN BY LOVETT FALSELY TO BE CHRISMAS EVE   DECEMBER 24TH, 2015 ON LOVETT’S SPURIOUS APRIL 6TH, 2017 PROBATION ORDER (EXHIBIT) IN CONTRADICTION OF THE SAID TDPSHP DUI OFFENSE REPORT # TK4KYLOUTI5U (EXHIBIT ) AND THE  SAID INSTANTER DUI DATE OF APRIL 4TH, 2016, (EXHIBIT) AND LOVETT’S  INVALID DELICT MARCH 19TH 2017 EXTRADITION WARRANT OFFENSE DATE  DUI 2016/FAILURE TO APPEAR. THE APPELLANT, THEREBY CAN NOT BE INCRIMINATED BY ANY PHYSICAL EVIDENCE DERIVING ALLEGEDLY FROM SAID NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE OF MPM 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY  ON A MALICIOUSLY ANTI CATHOLIC  SWORN IN VIOLATION OF FCC1000 TO BE CHRISTMAS EVE, DECEMBER 24TH, 2015 DATE ALBEIT  “OPEN CONTAINER” PLANTED EVIDENCE AND SPURIOUS BAC BLOOD SAMPLE TDPSCF LAB BOTH MANUFACTURED AND SUPRRESSED AS POTENTIALLLY EXONERATING, VIOLATING THEREBY IN THE STATE OF TEXAS IN ALL DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION THE DUI DEFENDANT’S  WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE FROM A FALLACIOUS NON EXISTENT OFFENSE SITE VIOLATES THE IVTH, VTH, VITH AMENDMENTS AND TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE.

 

 

 

APPELLANT PRAY THE COURT ORDER THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RETURN FORTH WITH THE APPELLANT’S DRIVER’S LICENSE C/M AND CLD- A SOURCE OF APPELLANT’S LIVELIHOOD- UNLAWFULLY CONFISCATED FROM THE APPELLANT FOR UNDERSIGNED REFUSAL OF BAC TEST BLOOD SAMPLE IN A BY TDPSCURTAILED EXERCISE OF APPELLANT’S IVTH AND VTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. THE BLOOD SAMPLES WERE VIOLENTLY PIRATED UNDER TORTUOUS DURESS AND IMPRISONMENT BY TDPS CONTRACTED EMPLOYEES AT CHI-ST. LUKE’S, LIVINGSTON TEXAS AROUND 11:00 P.M. APRIL 4TH, 2016  AS LAB “PROPS” FOR THE TDPS CRIMINAL FORENSIC’S CRIME LAB, HARRIS COUNTY UNLAWFULLY IN LEGALLY CONTRACTED COLLUSION WITH STAFFERS AT CHI ST. LUKE’S LIVINGSTON, TEXAS ON THE NIGHT OF APRIL 4TH, 2016 NOT WITHSTANDING MORAL OBJECTIONS BY THE APPELLANT FULLY CONSCIOUS IN THE ATTEMPTED EXERCISE OF HIS CIVIL AND GENEVA CONVENTION RIGHTS NOT TO BE EXPERIMENTED UPON IN AN INCRIMINATING WAY BY TDPS CONTRACTED EMPLOYEES AT CHI-ST.LUKE’S AS A PRISONER AGAINST HIS UNDERSIGNED BAC REFUSAL,  PIRATING, WITH NO PROBABLY CAUSE AT THE TIME GIVEN IN REPORT BY BILLY CORELY,  THE APPELLANT OBSERVED BY CORELY OR ATTESTED TO BY CORLEY AS DUI +.231, THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT,  BEING REPORTED BY BILLY CORELY IN SAID DUI OFFENSE REPORT,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PIRATING, THE APPELLANT’S BLOOD TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT OF 1ST  DUI CLASS A MISDEMEANOR, ENHANCED BAC +.15 IN SJCC, JOHN LOVET PRESIDING PERSONA SOL

 

 

A CRIMINAL ELEMENT, SINE QUA NON OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD IS THE UNCONSTITUIONAL 2003 TEXAS DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM. SAID EXTRA JUDICIAL EXTORTION RACKET VIA TDPS SUSPENDED THE APPELLANT’S C/M AND CDL LICENSE FOR IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE CONSTITUIONAL BAC BLOOD SAMPLE REFUSAL ACCORDING TO TEXAS BAC REFUSAL LAW- BLOOD SAMPLES FOR TDPS BAC TESTING CAN NOT BE TAKEN WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE- BILLY CORLEY’S SAID DUI OFFENSE REPORT DOES NOT TESTIFY TO ANY PRIME INDICATORS OF PROBABLY CAUSE OF .231 BAC. THE APPELLANT’S CASE IS AN EXEMPLAR CASE IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT, AND TDPS CURRENTLY HAS SUSPENDED 1.3 MILLION C/B/M LICENSES IN TEXAS IN VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS AND THE VITH AMENDMENT VIA THE 2003 TEXAS DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM FOR FAILURE TO PAY 1.8 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR UNLAWFULLY ASSESSED AS “A DOUBLE TAX” EXTORTED BY TDPS AS EXTRA LEGAL “SURCHARGES” IN VIOLATION OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THE VIIITH AMENDMENT- BILL OF PAIN AND PENALTIES TRIGGERED MOSTLY BY THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL  FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT . ALL SAID IS UNDERHANDED “CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE” BY ANOTHER INNOCUOUS NAME. IN A RECENT HOUSTON CHRONICLE POLL, TEXANS OPPOSE “CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE” BY 89% AGAINST, 4% FOR, 7% UNDECIDED. MOREOVER, SAID REGRESSIVE “DOUBLE TAX” IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE PUNISHES THE POOR MORE THAN THE RICH BY INABILITY TO PAY GOVERNMENT EXTORTION, AND BY INABILITY TO PAY SAID EXTORTION HAVE DRIVERS LICENSE SUSPENDED, AND IF STOPPED AND ARRESTED BEING JAILED INDEFINITELY UNTIL EXCESSIVE “SURCHARGES” ARE PAID, A VIOLATION OF THE VIIITH AMENDMENT NO EXCESSIVE BAIL CLAUSE. ALSO WHILE IN PRISON, THEREBY, VICTIMS OF THIS MAILICIOUS GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION FRAUD ARE DENIED THEIR VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO LEGAL COUNSEL. THE KATY COUNTY OF TEXAS IS CURRENTLY BEING SUED BY THE ACLU FOR VIOLATION UNDER COLOR OF LAW OF TEXAN’S CIVIL RIGHTS FOR OPERATING A “DEBTORS PRISON” VIA THE 2003 TEXAS DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM.

 

POIGNANTLY,THE TEXAS ADMINISTRATION TRANSPORTATION CODE, SB 970 “LIMITS THE MISSION” OF THE TDPS TO REGULATE COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORT (CLASS A/ CDL DRIVERS LICENSE) AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT INSECPTION  ALONE AND RURAL HIGHWAYS. BUT IN CRIMINAL VIOLATION OF  SAID TRANSPORTATION CODE LIMITS ON TDPS MISSION THE TDPS AS UNLAWFUL ENFORCER OF  2003 TEXAS DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM/ARL  HAS SUSPENDED 1.1 MILLION  NON PROFESSIONAL CLASS A/CDL DRIVERS LICENSES FOR FAILURE TO PAY 1.6 BILLION IN GOVERNMENT EXTORTION A YEAR AS A PRIME CRIMINAL ELEMENT OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

ANOTHER PRIME ELEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT VIA TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD EXTORTION ARE FINES AND TDPS SURCHARGES FOR DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS:

 

Financially there are fines, up to $2,000, or $4,000, or $10,000 depending if it’s a misdemeanor or a felony that you have to pay as a fine as punishment in the case. You have to pay probation fees every month which can be anywhere from $60 to $80. You have to pay for an identification card. You have to pay for the urine analysis which is done every month. You have to pay for the court costs, which are about $400 just for a misdemeanor DWI.

You have to pay for interlock costs, which it’s about $90 a month. If you just took probation for a first offense DWI, you are looking at $300 or $400 a month just for a first offense DWI misdemeanor probation, and then there’s a $1,000 a year surcharge to DPS for 3 years, and they’ll do © 2015 Tyler Flood Page 70. WHAT EVERY DRIVER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT DUI.

 

MOREOVER:

,

THERE ARE DEFENSE ATTORNEY FEES- $15,000 TO BE DEFENDED AND ACQUITTED BY A DUI ATTORNEY EVEN IF YOU ARE OBJECTIVELY GUILTY OF DUI AT THE TIME OF YOUR ARREST.

 

99% of the attorneys out there that are taking people’s money and handling DWIs do not know what they are doing. They mostly plead clients out routinely. These attorneys seldom go to trial. If the client wishes to fight their case, the attorneys will charge them an extra fee to fight it! The client is left wondering why they hired that attorney in the first place 2015 TYLER FLOOD PAGE 22, WHAT EVERY DRIVER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT DUI AT THE TIME OF YOUR ARREST.

 

INCREASED INSURANCE PREMIUMS IF CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS

 

LOST INCOME, AND OR JOB FROM IMPRISONMENT, OR LIVELIHOOD IN ILLEGAL CONFISCATION OF BOTH COMMERCIAL AND NON COMMERCIAL LICENSES VIA ARL.

 

LOSS OF A PRIMARY INDENTIFICATION DOCUMENT (DL) AND THEREFORE IDENTITY THEFT BY THE TDPS IN PERPETRATING THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

PUBLIC HUMILIATION OF YOUR NAME AND PICTURE APPEARING IN LOCAL “POLICE REPORTER” SCADAL SHEETS FOR DUI ARREST AT THE SAME TIME – INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY- THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIM IS DENIED PUBLIC HEARING AT P.C. COURT OF POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE FROM AN INDEPENDENT LAB BAC TEST COMPILED NO LESS OR ASAP AFTER DUI ARREST. DUI CONVICTION CANNOT BE EXPUNGED AND IS PERMANENT ON YOU CRIMINAL RECORD, UNLIKE ANYOTHER CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

 

THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  VICTIM IS EXTORTED $5OO TO $3,200( AT THIS POINTED THE VEHICLE IS AUCTIONED OR JUNKED BY CRONYS) TO HAVE HIS OR HER VEHICLE TOWED AND IMPOUNDED BY LOCAL CRONY TOWING COMPANIES, AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE,  WHERE THE TOWING COMPANY, EAST-TEX TOWING,  WROTE THE NON-EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE MPM 450 I-59 ON THE TOWING AND IMPOUND CHARGES INVOICE.

 

 

 

 

THE PENAL STATE, ESPECIALLY FOR SMALL RURAL JAILS LIKE SJC JAIL IS LUCRATIVE FOR ALL PRACTITIONER’S OF TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, ESPECIALLY LOCAL SHERIFF DEPT. AND COUNTY COURTS AS WELL AS TDC STATE PENITENTIARIES.

 

For a first offense DWI, the range of punishment is 72 hours in jail up to 6 months in jail. That’s for a class B. If you have a .15 or higher BAC, then the state can amend it and raise it to a class A, which is higher, and then your range of punishment is 72 hours in jail up to one year in county jail, or up to two years’ probation for either one of those two scenarios. 2015 TYLER FLOOD PAGE 22, WHAT EVERY DRIVER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT DUI AT THE TIME OF YOUR ARREST TYLER

 

 

TO THE END OF FILLING THE FACILITIES PERPETUALLY WITH NON VIOLENT OFFENDERS AS A PRIME ELEMENT IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  ALL TDPSFC LAB BAC REPORTS ISSUED  WITHIN  MONTH’S END AND WITHOUT EXCEPTION ARE ARBITRARY PEGGED AT +.15 BAC TO ENHANCE DUI GUILTY CONVICTION- AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE- FROM CLASS B TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR AND AFTER TWO SUCH CAM DUI CONVICTIONS, ENHANCED STATE FELONY. SAID FAUDULENT PRACTICE CANNOT BE PERPETRATED  BY THE BREATHELIZER TEST WHICH IS CONDUCTED BY THE ARRESTING DUI OFFICER AT DUI OFFENSE SITE WITHIN AN HOUR OF DUI SUSPECT ARREST. THE FIELD SOBRIETY BREATHELIZER IS NOT ADMISSIBLE IN COURT, BUT IS PROBABLE CAUSE FOR DUI ARREST. THE BREATHELIZER RESULT IS IMMEDIATE AND CONVEYED RIGHTLY TO THE DUI SUSPECT WHO THEN IS EITHER RELEASED FOR -.08 AND IS NOT SHOWING DUI RELATED BAC INTOXICATION IMPAIRMENT OF MENTAL AND PHYSICAL FACULTIES EVEN IF AT -.08 BAC BY BREATHELIZER, OR ARRESTED WITH DUI PROBABLY CAUSE. BREATHELIZER TO THEN TAKE ANOTHER ADMISSIBLE BREATHELIZER MACHINE BAC TEST. FOR ALL THESE SAID REASONS, THE BREATHELIZER DUI BAC REGIMEN IS INFINITELY PREFERABLE AND CONSTITUTIONALLY SUPERIOR TO BAC PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE UNCONSTITUIONAL TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. THE BAC PIRATED BLOOD PROP TDPSCF LAB REPORT IS MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE AND SIMULTANEOUSLY SUPPRESSED OXNORATING DUI BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE, AS BOTH IS SINE QUA NON IN THE PERPETERATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, THE FIELD SOBRIETY BEATHELIZER HAS BEEN “OBSOLETED” FOR THE MOST PART IN TEXAS FOR THIS REASON, BUT SHOULD BE BROUGHT BACK PERHAPS.

 

 

Percentage wise, probably 70% of DWI defendants have pretty high BACs. Does that always mean that the BAC number is accurate? Absolutely not! Blood cases tend to be higher than breath tests. The cause for that is somewhat unknown and even judges question on why blood draw results are higher than breath test results. It seems that the BAC should be the same whether you blow or if they draw your blood. 2015 TYLER FLOOD PAGE 22, WHAT EVERY DRIVER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT DUI AT THE TIME OF YOUR ARREST.

 

LOGICALLY THE FIELD SOBRIETY BREATHELIZER TEST MUST BE TWO TO THREE DRINKS HIGHER THAN THE BAC CHROMATOGRAPHY MACHINE TEST DONE 2 TO 3 HOURS AFTER DUI ARREST AT CHI-ST. LUKES, THEREFORE SUBTRACTING TWO TO THREE DRINKS FROM THE BAC TEST RESULTS.  SAID FACT PROVES BASED ON AN INEXORABLE MATRIX EFFECT BETWEEN SPITTLE ALCOHOL IN THE BREATHELIZER AND WATER ALCOHOL OR BLOOD ALCOHOL  TDPSCF LAB FRAUD IN MANUFACTURING IN EVERY TDPSFC LAB REPORT BAC +.15 TO ENHANCE

 

 

 

 

 

MOREOVER,

 

DISCOVERY IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE IMPLICATES BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT SAID UNLAWFUL SEIZING OF BLOOD SAMPLES FROM ALL DUI SUSPECTS IN ALL CASES THROUGHOUT TEXAS ARE A MERE PROP TO BE USED IN TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FORENSIC’S  CRIME LAB, HARRIS COUNTY’S MANUFACTURE  EVIDENCE OF BLOOD ALCOHOL CONTENT (BAC) FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF DUI SUSPECTS TO FALSELY INCRIMINATE THEM OF A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR ENHANCED BY A BOGUS  +.15 BAC TDPSCF LAB SELF VERIFYING REPORT AS EVIDENT IN THE APPELLANT CASE IN DENIAL OF THEIR IVTH AND VTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AS WELL AS GENEVA CONVENTION RIGHTS UNDER  COLOR OF LAW  IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.  PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES BY CHI ST. LUKE TDPS CONTRACTED EMPLOYEES AND TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD ARE A SINE QUA NON NO BAC REFUSAL SIGNED OR NOT SIGNED FOR ANY REASON ALWAYS 100% OF THE TIME TAKEN WITH NOT ONE EXCEPTION, USED TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT AND ALL DUI SUSPECTS IN TEXAS IN PERPETRATION OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

APPELLANT PRAYS COURT ORDER FOR EQUITABLE REDRESS AGAINST TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND COMMISSIONERS TO PAY JUDGEMENT FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY SAID CRIMINAL MANNER FOR FALSE JAILING IN SUPPRESSION OF BLOOD SAMPLE EXONERATING EVIDENCE BY THE TDPSCF LAB TILL PATENTLY BOGUS BAC REPORT ISSUED APRIL 25TH, 2016  AND A SECOND JUDGEMENT  FOR ALL HARM DONE TO THE APPELLANT IN ILLEGALLY CONFISCATING THE APPELLANTS C/M DRIVING LICENSE FOR BLOOD SAMPLE REFUSAL IN VIOLATION OF THE 2003 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY’S GOOD DRIVERS PROGRAM LIMITED TO CDL CONFISCATION ALONE, ENHANCED BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

6)NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SUIT REPRESENTING ALL ANYONE IN TEXAS INJURED IN LIFE, HAPPINESS, AND LIBERTY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD

 

 

 

BY SAID DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN TEXAS TO FALSELY CONVICTION VIA TDPSCF LAB REPORT BAC MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE  AND SUPRESSED BAC POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLES AT BAC OO. –O8, AND -.15  BY THE TDPSCF LAB HARRIS COUNTY SPURIOUSLY DUE TO “LAB BACK LOG.”  IN TANDEM WITH THE 2003 SAFE DRIVING ACT AND LICENSE REVOCATION LAW BY UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIOLATION OF SAID CLASS ACTION PLAINTIFFS’ IVTH, VTH, VITH, VIIITH, XVIIITH, AND XXITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS SAID APPEAL AND PETITION PRAYING WRIT OF MANDAMUS BY THE APPELLANT SERVES AS AN EXEMPLAR CASE IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT. ALL PLAINTIFF LEGAL STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT TO BE ESTABLISHED ACCORDINGLY, THEREBY.

 

 

Uncertainty of Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Results as

Related to Instrumental Conditions: Optimization and

Robustness of BAC Analysis Headspace Parameters

Haleigh A. Boswell and Frank L. Dorman

 

MOREOVER, ALL TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORTS FOR DUI PROSECUTION ARE SELF CERTIFIED AT “% 99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” OF BAC DEGREE ACCURACY IN THEIR BAC TESTING RESULTS BRANDISHED AT THE APPELLANT’S TRIAL OR OVERWHELMINGLY IN “PLEA BARGAINING” TO GET DUI GUILTY CONVICTIONS IN 99.7 OF CASES IN TEXAS PLAYING ON THE TDPSCD/P VICTIM’S COMPLETE IGNORANCE OF THE BAC TEST AND IT’S TRUE ACCURACY. THE ABOVE REPORT DONE IN 2015 TO ACHIEVE THE MOST EXACTING PRECISE RESULTS COMPARING AND CONTRASTING HEAD SPACE TEMPURATURES, PRESCINDING THE INEXORABLE MATRIX EFFECT ACCURACY VERIATIONS , OF BLOOD OR WATER ALCOHOL, WITH THE BAC CHROMATOGRAPHY MACHINE IN OPTIMAL OPERATING CONDITION, REGISTERED A 99% CONFIDENCE LEVEL OF ACCURENCY. TDPSFC LAB IN 100% OF THEIR BAC TESTING WITH THEIR DOCUMENTED LACK OF BAC MACHINE CALIBRATION, STILL SWEARS ON 100% OF ALL REPORTS TDPSCF LAB BAC TESTING IS ALWAYS %99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL OR  % .7  GREATER THAN THEIR PERFECT RESULT UNDER THE OPTIMAL SETTINGS REPORTED IN THIS SCIENTIFIC STUDY.  ONE MIGHT SAY, COME ON, IT’S ONLY  %.7 PERCENT DIFFERNCE.  BUT CONSIDERING ONE IS GUILTY OF DUI AT .O8 BAC WHICH IS HUGELY LOWER THAN %.7 BAC- AT .7 A NORMAL HUMAN IS DEAD FROM ALCOHOL POISONING MANY TIMES OVER, THE %.7 ADD ON IN ACCURACY IS DAMING IN ASSURING DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS.

 

The chromatographic performance of the analytes was the main concern in the alteration of the

headspace parameters. Variations in sample preparation were of no interest in this analysis.

Chromatographic resolution and peak shape are vital in determining peak area for quantification of blood

alcohol determination. With minor alterations of few headspace parameters, the accuracy and precision

of the alcohol concentration can be drastically altered. Determining the optimal parameters are of utmost

importance to achieve the most robust and precise analysis. Therefore, it is recommended from these

data that the headspace oven temperature for this instrumentation be set to 85 °C, with a headspace vial

pressurization of 15 psi, for the best overall performance.

 

TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY, DOES NOT IN ANY WAY FOLLOW THIS EXACTING BAC TESTING REGIMEN.  AND EVEN IF THEY DID, THEY DON’T AS 1400 COURT CASES SHOW, THE TDPS FORENSIC CRIME LAB BAC TEST REPORTS COULD ONLY REPORT A %99 NOT A “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” IN BAC TEST ACCURANCY.

 

.

 

 

 

7)THE APPELLANT PRAYS SAID COURT FOR PROTECTON AND PURSUANT OF EQUITABLE REDRESS AND RELIEF FROM FURTHER TORTS BY JOHN LOVETT AND SJC ACCOMPLICES TO IINDICT FOR ALL SAID FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS WITH PROBABLY CAUSE THE FOLLOWING FALSELY AND MALICIOUSLY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT, 2/23/17 SJCC CAUSE NO. 2016 -215-, IST DUI, ENHANCED TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR VIA TDPSCFL BAC REPORT AT +.15 BAC PURSUANT OF THE APPELLANT’S FALSE ARREST AND JAILING FOR 365 DAYS TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT IN THE SJC JAIL WITHOUT PROBATION.

 

IN FALSELY AND MALICIOUSLY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT ON 2/23/17, ALL SAID, CONVICTED THEMSELVES OF ALL SAID FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS. RES IPSO IGITUR, IN THE INTEREST OF THE PROTECTION OF SOCIETY PURSUANT OF JUSTICE, THE APPELLANT FOR COMMISSION OF ALL SAID CRIMES PRAY THE COURT TO ORDER WARRANTS FOR THE ARREST OF ALL SAID CRIMINAL MALEFACTORS:

 

 

John Lovett Jr.           

1 State Hwy 150, Room 23
Coldspring, TX 77331

Phone: 936-653-2199
Fax: 936-653-3970
Office Hours 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.
Monday thru Friday

 

Mark A. Boemio
First Assistant District Attorney, SJC

Christina T. Wood
Assistant District Attorney, SJC

 

1 State Hwy 150, Room 21
Coldspring, TX 77331
Phone: 936-653-2601

 

Judge Earnest L. McClendon
258th District Court
101 West Mill Street Ste. 286 Livingston, Texas 77351

Phone: 936-327-6847
Fax: 936-327-6881

 

 

BILLY CORLEY,

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

5500 FM 2025 COLDSPRING, TEXAS 77331

 

TEL.: (936) 653-2173, FAX: (936) 653-3460

 

JESSE SLAUGHTER

SAN JACINTO COUNTY SHERRIFF’S OFFICE

75 W. CEDAR AVENUE

COLDSPRING, TEXAS 77331

TEL.: (936) 653-4367

FAX. 99360 653-4588

 

DANNY VANDERMAN, REGISTERED NURSE

CHI-ST. LUKE’S MEMORIAL LIVINGSTON

1717 HIGHWAY 59 LOOP N.

LIVINGSTON, TX 77351

TEL.: (936) 329-8700

 

RAUCHEL AUBEL, FORENSIC SCIENTIST, EXPERT WITNESS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CRIME LABORATORY

12230 WEST RD.

BUILDING C

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77065

 

CARDINAL DANIEL DINARDO, ARCHBISHOP OF GALVESTON/HOUSTON

CHI-ST. LUKE’S ETHICAL MEDICAL POLICY HEAD AND CORPORATE PARTNER.

1700 SAN JACINTO, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77001-0907

 

ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT:

 

IN CONTEMPT OF ORDER TO CEASE AND TO DESIST, 04/29/2017 FROM WARRANTING THE FALSE INPRISONMENT OF THE APPELLANT RE: 2016 -215-

 

THERESA MILNER, DIRECTOR

SAN JACINTO COUNTY COMMUNITY SUPERVISION AND CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT

 

LOREINA KLEVINSKI, OFFICER 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7) CALL FOR HONORABLE JUDGE TO IMPANEL A GRAND JURY IN TEXAS TO INVESTIGATE AND INDICT WITH PROBABLY CAUSE  FORTEXAS  GOVERNMENT/TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND POLICE  CORRUPTION REVENUE FRAUD VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF DUI/POM

 

.

 

8) MOTION MADE FOR STATUS OF APPEAL AND PETITION COURT HEARING

 

 

 

 

FACTUAL BASIS OF GROUNDS FOR SAID APPEAL AND PETITION OF MANDAMUS 

 

RE: CASE NO. 17-322548, MAY19, 2017, MONTGOMERY COUNT COURT, LAW FIVE DISMISSED “IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE” BY ORDER OF ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO, AN ESTOPPEL OF SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT CAUSE NO. 2016-215- 2016 1ST DUI CAM 2/23/17 CONVICTION AND SENTENCING AND PROBATION ORDER BY SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT, APRIL 6TH, 2017, AND AN ESTOPPEL NO. 1CC18542 DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID-DL-CONVICTION  4/13/2017 IN THE JUSTICE COURT PCT. 01, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS, JUDGE WAYNE L. MACK.

 

 

FIRST, ON MARCH 13TH, AND AGAIN ON MAY 13TH, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT DEPUTIES AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, AT LAW 5, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO, GIVING NO  DUE DILIGENCE TO FACT, NOR JURISPRUDENCE SHOWN ADJUDICATING  THE VALIDITY OF 2016 DUI/ FAILURE TO APPEAR EXTRADITION WARRANT ORDERED UNLAWFULLY BY JOHN LOVETT AS PERSONA SOL,IN SPITE OF THE APPELLANT LATER OBJECTING AT SO CALLED P.C. COURT, MC COURT AT LAW FIVE TO SAID PAUL DAMICO PRESIDING AT HEARING, HIS TRANSPORTATION RIGHTS ARE BEING VIOLATED BY SAID COURT AND “JOHN LOVETT IS MALICOUSLY PROSECUTING ME,” THERE BY. WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING UNLAWFULLY IMPERSONATING A SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGE, AND  IN SPITE OF REPEATED IN HEARING OBJECTIONS  BY THE APPELLANT TO SAID INVALID DELICT EXTRADITION WARRANT ENFORCEMENT, HAVING TRIED SEVERAL TIMES TO  INFORM  MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPUTIES OF MCJ OF  SAID EXTRADITION WARRANT’S INVALIDITY AND THEREFORE UNLAWFULNESS TO ENFORCE, WAS NONETHELESS FALSELY ARRESTED AND JAILED IN MC JAIL UNLAWFULLY ENFORCING  SAID  2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR DELICT WARRANT ORDERED BY JOHN LOVETT PERSONA SOL, APRIL 6TH, 2017, FOR THE APPELLANT’S ARREST AND TO BE JAILED WITHOUT BAIL AT MCJ AND HENCE  UNLAWFULLY BY SAID DELICT EXTRADITION WARRANT  BE TRANSPORTED MANACLED TO SJC JAIL IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND TRANSPORTATION RIGHTS BY SAID COURT AND JUDGE, AND BEING EXTRADITED TO SJC JAIL  JAILED FOR 365 DAYS- TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT FOR 1ST DUI BY ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT PERSONA SOL. ON MARCH 14TH, IN  SO CALLED PROBABLE CAUSE COURT HEARING AT LAW FIVE, MC COURT, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO,  IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SUSTAINED AND ENFORCED SAID INVALID DELICT WARRANT IN SPITE OF THE APPELLANT’S, THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE’S LEGAL SPOKEN OBJECTIONS AGAINST THE WARRANT’S LAWFULNESS.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, AB INITIO MARCH 13TH, 2017, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT DEPUTIES AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, LAW 5, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO, DID NOT GIVE DUE LAW ENFORCEMENT DILIGENCE NOR SHOW JURISPRUDENCE ADJUDICATING THE VALIDITY OF SAID 2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT RE: ESTOPPEL SJCC 2016 215  EXTRADITION WARRANT BY ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT AS PERSONA SOL  WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING AS SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGE .   A SECOND TIME, AB INITIO MAY 13TH,2017 , AGAIN IN SO CALLED PROBABLE CAUSE COURT ACTING AS MCC AT  LAW FIVE, JUDGE DAMICO OVER RULED  THE APPELLANT’S REASONABLE,  LAWFUL, OBJECTIONS AND DISMISSED FACTUAL GROUNDS  OBJECTION TO THE VALIDITY AND LAWFULNESS OF SAID OBVIOUSLY ABSURD SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT  AND LOVETT’S, PERSONA SOL,  ORDERED  2016 DUI CONVICITION SJCC 2/23/17 SANCTION OF SUSPENSION OF DRIVERS LICENSE RE: AN ESTOPPEL SJCC 2016 -215-   COURT IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. MOREOVER, AB INITIO, MARCH 13TH PROCESSING AT MCJ IN VIOLATION OF THE IVTH AND VITH AMENDMENT, THE APPELLANT WAS ALIENATED BY MC JAIL DEPUTIES OF IN HAND SJCC LEGAL DOCUMENTS EXONERATING THE APPELLANT OF ALL SAID CHARGES. BY SAID VIOLATIONS, SAID EXONERATING EVIDENCE OF ALL SAID CHARGES WAS DENIED THE APPELLANT BY THE MCSD DEPUTIES AT THE MC COURT PROBABLE CAUSE HEARING OF HIS EXONERATING LEGAL DOCUMENTS IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AB INITIO.

 

 

IPSO RES, IGITUR, MC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT DEPUTIES AND MC COURT, AT LAW FIVE, ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO, DID TWICE, AB INITIO MARCH 13, 2017, AND MAY 13, 2017 PLACED THE APPELLANT IN VIOLATION OF THE US CONSTITUTION SEC. 3  IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY,  AND FALSELY ARRESTED AND JAILED THE APPELLANT, AN INNOCENT AMERICAN CITIZEN UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIOLATION OF HIS CIVIL RIGHTS. THIS TORT IS ENHANCED BY THE CRIMINAL PRETEXT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN PERPETRATION OF TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD AND AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME SPECIFICALLY IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE BEING PERPETRATED AGAINST THE APPELLANT BY THE MCSD AT MCJ AND MC COURT AT LAW 5, ACTING AS JUDGE AS ACCESSARY AFTER THE FACT WITH VINCIBLE IGNORANCE.

 

MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT DEPUTIES AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, LAW 5, ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO  TWICE ON MARCH 13, 2017 AND MAY 13, 2017  CANNOT PLEAD INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE IN ACCESSARY  AFTER THE FACT  IN THE FACE OF THE APPELLANT’S  TWO IN COURT HEARINGS AT LAW FIVE, FACTUAL LEGAL OBJECTIONS AS DEFENDANT PRO SE  TO VIOLATION OF HIS WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY SAID DELICT INVALID WARRANT AND SPURIOUS PROBATION ORDERS BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL,  BUT ALL SAID, ARE CULPABLY “LEAD ON” BY JOHN LOVETT’S MALICIOUS CRIMINAL EXTRA JUDICIAL RUSES AND RES IPSO IGITUR COMPLICIT ACCOMPLICES  AS ACCESARY AFTER THE FACT, COMPLICIT IN TEXAS GOVERNMENT/ POLICE CORRUPTION DUI FALSE CONVICTION RACKET OF THE APPELLANT  IN THE PRETEXT OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY’S COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD,  IN TANDEM WITH THE 2003TEXAS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY DRIVER RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM 2003 SAFE DRIVING PROGRAM AND CIVIL LICENSE FORFEITURE PROGRAM.

DUI/POM FRAUD REVENUE RACKET CRIMINAL ELEMENTS.

 

MOREOVER, EXCLUSIVE OF ENHANCEMENT OF PERPETRATION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME, ANYONE AND ALL HAVE STANDING IN TEXAS AS PLAINTIFFS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT WHO EVER IS CONVICTED GUILTY BY THE STATE OF TEXAS VIA “PLEA BARGAINING” OR TRIAL  VIA  BY TDPSCF LAB  SUPPRESSED POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLY EVIDENCE AT THE SAME TIME USED AS LAB PROPS IN MANUFACTURE INCRIMINATING AND ENHANCING EVIDENCE SELF SPURIOUSLY CERTIFIED AT “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” (HOW ACCURATE IS BLOOD TESTING FOR ALCOHOL? NO ONE KNOWS FOR CERTAIN- OCTOBER 29, 2009, ARIZONA DUI DEFENSE BLOG) INHERENTLY FRAUDULENT TDPSFC LAB BAC REPORTS BASED ON SAID PROP BLOOD SAMPLES IN 100% OF ALL DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTIONS CASESIN TEXAS PIRATED UNDER DURESS BY TDPS AGENTS EVEN IN SPITE OF UNDERSIGNED REFUSAL, IN VIOLATION OF THE VTH AMENDMENT AND GENEVA CONVENTION

 

DECEPTIVELY CLAIMING A SCIENTIFICALLY UN VERIFIABLE  “99.7  CONFIDENCE  LEVEL”  A SELF CERTIFYING TAUTOLOGY  OF ALLEGED BAC TDPSFC LAB TEST REPORT ACCURACY ( A SPURIOUS DISTORTION OF FACTS) IS USED BY ASS. DA’S SUCH AS MARK BOEMIO AND CHRISTINA WOOD TO FALSELY CONVICT BY A LIED TO JURY DUI DEFENDANTS IN COURT, OR TO INTIMIDATE AND TO COERCE THEREBY GUILTY “PLEA BARGAINING” CONVICTIONS WHERE THE DUI DEFENDANT IS CONNED BY LYING ASS. DA’S INTO GIVING UP VI TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. ALL SAID IS SINE QUA NON  IN  THE COMMISSION OF TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD. AT SAID SPECIOUS “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL.”

 

 

IN 100% OF DUI PROSECUTION (MALICIOUS) CASES IN TEXAS, ALL DUI DEFENDANTS ARE DENIED THEIR 2012 STATE OF TEXAS MICHAEL MORTON RIGHTS TO A BLOOD EVIDENCE RETEST FOR PROBABLE CAUSE OF INVALIDITY BY THE TDPSCF LAB UNSPOKEN POLICY. SAID UNSPOKEN POLICY AS A SINEQUA NON, WITH NO EXCEPTIONS TO PROTECT THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD RACKET FROM EXPOSURE AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SUIT FOR FALSE JAILING BASED ON MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED BAC BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE. AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, THE APPELLANT’S PRIMA FACIE LUDICROUS TDPSCF LAB SELF CERTIFIED REPORT BY RACHEL AUBEL SWORN TO BE  231 BAC (APRX. 3x THE LEGAL LIMIT OF O8) IN A TEXAS COURT OF LAW IS DENIED RETESTING BY SAID SAME LAB FOR VALIDITY, IN RESTESTING  TO BE DONE BY THE SAME  RACHEL AUBEL A TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST TECHNICIAN WHO AFTER FIRST SUPPRESSING THE APPELLANT’S EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE FOR ALMOST A MONTH, APRIL 4TH TO 29TH, 2017, AT TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY, IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO A SPEEDY TRIAL WITH NO SUPPRESSION OF POTENTIALLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE BY STATE PROSECUTORS TO BE CONVICTED GUILTY,  ISSUED  APRIL 29, 2016 SAID OBVIOUSLY LUDICROUS MANUFACTURED  .231 BAC TEST RESULTS REPORT AS MANUFACTURED INCRIMINATING  TDPSCF LAB BAC “EVIDENCE”  MALICIOUSLY  LEVELLED AT THE APPELLANT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD SCAM.  SAID RETESTING IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE  IS WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE REJECTED   BY JOHN LOVETT ON JANUARY 9TH, 2017 IN DISCOVERY IN STRICT ADHERENSE TO TDPSCF LAB NO RETEST DE FACTO POLICY.IN  VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S  AND EVERYONE IN  TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI THEREBY’ 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHT TO HAVE “FOR THE SAKE OF JUSTICE, NOT CONVICTION” DNA EVIDENCE OF WHICH BLOOD SAMPLES ARE PAR EXCELLENCE RETESTED BY THE SAME TDPSCF LAB BAC TECHNICIAN WHO UNDERSIGNED THE SELF CERTIFED ALLEGED BAC TEST GRADE AB INITIO..

 

ON JANUARY 9TH, IN DISCOVERY COURT SJCC, ASS. DA MARK BOEMIO VIOLENTLY OBJECTED TO THE MOTION BY THE APPELLANT FOR A COURT ORDER BY SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT FOR SAID RESTESTING. BOEMIO, WHO LIED PREVIOUSLY IN EARLY MAY, 2016  TO THE APPELLANT ABOUT THE RIGHT IN OUR SYSTEM TO RETEST BAC RESULTS IN AN UNSOLICITED DUI PLEA BARGAIN OVER THE PHONE,  STATED IN COURT HEARING  BEFORE LOVETT THE TDPSCF LAB REFUSES IN ALL CASES THEY WERE REQUESTED ALLEGEDLY BY THE SJCC TO HAVE A DISPUTED BAC REPORT RESULT RETESTED BY THE BAC TEST TECHICIAN WHO ISSUED THE REPORT IN THE HARRIS COUNTY FACILITY.

 

SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT, WHO AT THIS JUNCTURE DID HAVE CONSTITIONAL AND STATE JUDICIAL STANDING TO GRANT THE APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR A TDPSCF LAB RETEST PURSUANT OF THE MICHAEL MORTON LAW, HAD ENCOURAGED THE APPELLANT IN A PREVIOUS DISCOVERY HEARING TO WRITE A COURT ORDER LOVETT WOUL ENDORSE FOR A BAC RETEST ONLY BY A NON TDPS “INDEPENDENT LAB.”  THE APPELLANT, AT FIRST IN ACCORD, SOON REALIZED THIS STIPULATION TO BE  AN OBVIOUS COVER UP TO GUARD AGAINST SELF INCRIMINATION AND EXPOSURE BY THEIR OWN HANDS  THE FRAUDULENT, CRIMINAL  NATURE ON MANY LEVELS OF THE TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORTS  SINE QUA NON IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF TDPS DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION REVENUE FRAUD.  THE INDEPENDENT LAB RETEST WOULD NOT BE SELF CERTIFIED AS 99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL THUS DEEMED INFERIOR PER SE TO TDPSFCL REPORT RESULTS. MOREOVER, UNLIKE ANY INDEPENDENT LAB, THE TDPSCF LAB BAC PROCEDURE IS SANCTIONED BY THE SJCC COURT, AND IS LESS EXPENSIVE, THE BLOOD SAMPLE WOULD NOT HAVE TO BE SPLIT, AND THE BAC TECHNICIAN-UNKNOWN- WOULD NOT HAVE TO BE SUB PEONA AS EXPERT WITNESS AND EXAMINED ABOUT PROCEDURE. ALL ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT’S MOTION TO RETEST BY RACHEL AUBEL. AN INDEPENDENT LAB BAC RESULT CAN BE CREDITED AS INJECTING A REASONABLE DOUBT ABOUT THE VERACITY OF THE TDPSFC LAB RESULT AND NO ADMITTING NO WRONG DOING, THE TDPSCF LAB IS LET OFF THE HOOK TO DEFRAUD AND FALSELY CONVICT THE NAÏVE ANOTHER DAY.

 

AS SUCH, ALL AND ANY ONE, THEREBY, GAIN STANDING AS PLAINTIFFS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT, CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS WITH TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORTS IN ALL DUI CASES BY UNSPOKEN POLICY-CONSPIRACY- SINE QUA NON IN COMMISSION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  DENIED THEIR 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS TO RETEST FOR VALIDITY WITH PROBABLE CAUSE DNA/BAC BLOOD SAMPLES PURSUANT OF JUSTICE AND NOT CONVICTIONS. AND BY THE SAME NOT RETESTED BY TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT UNDER SIGNER  IS IN EVERY DUI CASE IN TEXAS, THE DUI GUILTY CONVICTS’ VTH AND VITH AMENDMENTS  AS WELL AS THE TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE IS VIOLATED.

 

ON 2/23/17, SJC COURT, THE APPELLANT’S MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS VIOLATED, TEXAS STATE PROSECUTION BAC TEST AND REPORT STATE EXPERT WITNESS SAID RACHEL AUBEL UNDER OATH IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 AFFIRMED AND CONFIRMED APRIL 29TH, 2017, BAC TOXICOLOGY REPORT FRAUDULENTLY LIKED TO THE APPELLANT AS ALLEGEDLY ACCURATE AT “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” (HOW ACCURATE IS BLOOD TESTING FOR ALCOHOL? IN TRUTH NO KNOWS FOR SURE, OCTOBER 29, 2009 ARIZONA DUI DEFENSE BLOG) BY AUBEL.  SAID TESTIMONY BY AUBEL UNDER OATH IN SJCC THAT DAY IN SJCC LEAD TO +.15 BAC  ENHANCEMENT  OF 1ST DUI TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR FALSE CONVICTION OF THE APPELLANT IN AB SENTIA AND UNLAWFUL JAILING IN SAN JACINTO COUNTY JAIL FOR 365 DAYS (TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT) WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION,  BY  SENTENCING ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT, ISSUED IN VIOLATION  OF  TEXAS SENTENCING LAW,  SENTENCING APPELLANT  IN ABSENTIA, AND TO TWICE THE LEGAL SENTENCING LIMIT.

 

 

TO CONTINUE

 

FIRST BEGINNING WITH THE APPELLANT’S FALSE ARREST ON MARCH 13TH,  MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT DEPUTIES AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, LAW 5, ACTING JUDGE PAUL DAMICO, WITHOUT DUE DILIGENCE TO FACT AND JURISPRUDENCE IN ADJUDICATION CULPABLE OF VINCIBLE IGNORANCE,  UNLAWFULLY ENFORCED SAID DELICT INVALID 2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT EXTRADITION WARRANT,  FRAUDULENTLY AND MALICIOUSLY ORDERED APRIL 6TH,  BY JOHN LOVETT AS PERSONA SOL, WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING, RES IPSO IGITUR CRIMINALLY IMPERSONATING A SJCC JUDGE,  AND FALSELY JAILED SAID APPELLANT IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL DERIVING FROM 2/23/17 2016 DUI (FALSE CONVICTION IN ABSENTIA (EXHIBIT), SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT, JUDGE JOHN LOVETT PERSONA SOL  PRESIDING, UNLAWFULLY PURSUANT OF  SENTENCING AND PROBATION ORDER, APRIL 6TH, 2017, UNLAWFULLY ORDERED BY JOHN LOVET, PERSONA SOL, WITHOUT LAWFUL JUDICIAL STANDING RE: CAUSE NO: 2016 -215- SJCC, 2/23/2017.

 

 

ON MARCH 13TH, MOREOVER,  THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY HIGHWAY PATROL, OFFICER  ACCOMPLICE BEFORE THE FACT, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL, AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT,AT  LAW  5,  UNLAWFULLY PROSECUTED SAID DELICT INVALID SPECIOUS AND MALICIOUS  EXTRAITION WARRANT ISSUED APRIL 6TH, 2017 WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING BY JOHN LOVETT AS PERSONA SOL (EXHIBIT ), AND  FALSELY ARRESTED APPELLANT IN THE COURT OF JUDGE WAYNE MACK. AFTER THE APPELLANT’S FALSE CONVICTION IN SAID ESTOPPEL CASE.

 

 

ON MAY 13 AB INITIO, FOR THE SECOND TIME, PLACING THE APPELLANT IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY,  THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL, AND MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT, LAW  5, PAUL DAMICO ACTING AS JUDGE, WITH NO DUE  DILIGENCE TO FACT NOR JURISPRUDENCE  CULPABLE OF VINCIBLE IGNORANCE UNLAWFULLY PROSECUTED  AN OBVIOUSLY A PRIMA FACIE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE COVER UP  LUDICROUS RUSE BY JOHN LOVETT OF AN IN NAME ONLY EXISTENT DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT AND ASSOCIATES TO COVER UP AB INITO MALICIOUS PROSECUTION 2/23/17 FALSE DUI CONVICTION COMMITTED AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN FALSELY CONVICTING AND SENTENCING THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE FOR SAID 2/23/17 FALSE CONVICTION  IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS’  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, ILLEGALLY  IN ABSENTIA ON 2/23/17.

FOR  A SECOND TIME,   THE APPELLANT’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO NOT BE PLACED IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY FOR THE SAME OFFENSE RE: 2016 -215-  2/23/17 DUI FALSE CONVICTION SJCC WERE VIOLATED AS ACCESORY AFTER THE FACT CULPABLE OF VINCIBLE IGNORANCE BY MCJ AND MC COURT, AT LAW 5, ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO LEAD ON BY LOVETT’S COVER UP A PRIMA FACIE ABSURD DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION RUSE TO COVER LOVETT’S TRACKS TO SAID 2/23/17 FALSE DUI CONVICTION IN ABSENTIA OF THE APPELLANT.

 

AS A COVER UP, OR OVER, TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE LOVETT ISSUED TWO CONTRADICTORY PROBATION ORDERS BOTH WITHOUT THE FOREKNOWLEDGE OR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPELLANT IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S DUE PROCESS, THE FIRSTON:APRIL 6TH, 2017 (EXHIBIT)-PROBATION DERIVING FROM SAID DUI FALSE CONVICTION, AND AT SOME OTHER DATE AFTERWORDS  SAID SPECIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER  THE EXHIBIT OF THE APRIL 6TH FIRST PROBATION ORDER IS IN EVERY FACT AND DETAIL A LIE COVERING OVER THE TRUE FACTS OF THE APPELLANT’S TRIAL BY JURY IN ABSENTIA LOVETT PRESIDING AND DUI CONVICTION/ 2/23/17 IN SJCC RE”CAUSE NO. 2016 -215-. NOTABLE IN THE EXHIBIT IS THE OFFENSE DATE- DECEMEBR 24TH, 2015 CONTRASTED WITH THE ACTUAL DATE OF APRIL 4TH, 2016, AND THE TDPSFC LAB .231 BAC REPORT ENHANCING IST DUI TO A CLASS A MISDEANOR DATE OF APRIL 29TH, 2016 . RES IPSO, IGITUR,  THERE ARE TWO  CONTRADICTORY SPURIOUS PROBABTION ORDERS  DERIVING  FROM THE FIRST SPECIOUS UNLAWFUL APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER RUSE TO COVER OVER LOVETT’S TRACKS TO THE SCENE OF HIS AB INITIO CRIME, 2/23/ 17 SJCC.  BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, THE FIRST PROBATION ORDER APRIL 6TH, 2017,  A RUSE TO COVER OVER AND OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, LOVETT IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 CHANGED THE DUI OFFENSE DATE- AS WELL AS EVERY SINGLE FACT OF THE TRIAL AND PROCEEDINGS  2/23/17 -APRIL 4TH, 2016  DUI FALSE CONVICTION OF THE APPELLANT SJCC, RE:2016-215-  AND IN AN ANTI-CATHOLIC SLUR- ALTERED THE AB INITIO  APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI OFFENSE DATE IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 TO CHRISTMAS EVE, DECEMBER 24TH , 2015 CHANGED FROM THE INSTANTER AND TDPSHP DUI OFFENSE REPORTS (EXHIBIT ) SHOWN TO BE APRIL 4, 2016 IN A LUDICROUS ATTEMPTED COVER OVER OF LOVETT’S  SJCC FALSE CONVICTION OF THE  APPELLANT BEFORE A JURY IN ABSENTIA 2/23/17 WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING.

 

ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 19,2017, THE EASTEX ADVOCATE , your eastex news.com REPORTED:

TIMESTAMP: CLERK SAYS JUDGE BROKE INTO HER OFFICE;LOVETT SAYS VISIT WAS PROPER.

DAWN WRIGHT, SJC DISTRICT CLERK, CONCERNED THAT THE DATE STAMP THAT INCLUDES HER SIGNATURE IS BEING USED (BY LOVETT) WITHOUT HER PERMISSION, IS NOW CALLING FOR AN INVESTIGATION.

ACCORDING TO WRIGHT, THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME LOVETT HAS HELPED HIMSELF TO HER STAMP, CITING ANOTHER INCIDENT ON JUNE 23.

“AS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL , I AM VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN HAPPENING AROUND HERE,” SAID WRIGHT.

WRIGHT IS TAKING PRECAUTIONS NOW TO PROTECT HER OFFICE. THE LOCKS HAVE BEEN CHANGED AND THE COUNTY JUDGE  NO LONGER HAS A WORKING KEY. LOVETT DOES NOT EXPECT ANY CHARGES TO COME AGAINST HIM IN THE MATTER.

 

RES IPSO, iGITUR, EXHIBIT EVIDENCE INDICATES  CULPABILITY  IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 OF LOVETT  IN ALTERING  THE APRIL 4TH, 2016 INSTANTER DATE OF DUI OFFENSE RE:2016-215-BY THE ,  DECEMBER 24TH  2015 DUI OFFENSE DATE , FALLACIOUS IN ALL FACTS APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL,  TO AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE SPEECH SLUR TO DATE OF DUI OFFENSE CHRISTMAS EVE, DECEMBER 24TH, 2015, AS LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES ATTEMPT TO COVER OVER THEIR  TRACKS  TO 2/23/17 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC  HATE CRIME BY FALSE  DUI CONVICTION OF THE APPELLANT IN THE FRAUDULENT CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

RES IPSO, iGITUR, LOVETT COMMITTED FELONIOUS TORTS AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY OF THE SAN JACINTO COUNTY DISTRCT  CLERK’S OFFICE BY STEALING UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THE DISTRICT COURT CLERK’S TIME STAMP TO ALTER AND MANIPULATE DATES OF SJC COURT RECORDS.  WHETHER LOVETT USED, OR DID NOT BOTHER TO USE THE SJC CLERK TIME STAMP IS THE SAME IN REGARD, THE CRIMINAL EFFECT AND INTENT IS THE SAME, TO  LOVETT’S  CRIMINAL HISTORY OF VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 IN ALTERING DUI  OFFENSE DATES REGARDING 2016-215- TO DECEMBER 24TH, 2015, AND  BE IT ON THE RE: SJCC 2016 -215- TEXAS STATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, UNDERSIGNED BY ASS. DA. CHRISTINA WOOD IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTING AND FALSELY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT PURSUANT OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME, ON 2/23/17 SJCC, OR THE SAID SAME RUSE COVER OVER DATE ON THE APRIL 6TH, 2016 PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT WHICH IN ALL FACTS  IS FALLACIOUS, RES IPSO. IGITUR NULL AND VOID, NOT HAVING THE FORCE OF LAW AS A PROBATION ORDER..

 

TO CONTINUE…….

 

 

SAID SAME COURT, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT AND JAIL, FOR A SECOND TIME ON  MAY 14TH,   SAID SAME ACTING AS JUDGE, IN PROBABLE CAUSE COURT COURT,   AGAIN WITH VINCIBLE IGNORANCE AND WITH NO JURISPRUDENCE OUT OF HAND DISMISSED THE APPELLANT’S PLEAS TO BE EXONERATED OF THE MANIFESTLY ABSURD AND A LEGAL NON SEQUITOR OF THE TWO AB INITIO  MAY 13 CHARGES BROUGHT IN TANDEM AGAINST THE APPELLANT: NO.1)  DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID ( THE SUSPENSION OF LICENSE DERIVING SANCTIONED BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, DERIVING  FROM DUI CONVICTION IN SAID CAUSE NO: 2016 -215- 2/23/17 1ST DUI CONVICTION) ENHANCED BY: NO.2, VIOLATION OF SAID SPECIOUS,SPURIOUS AND ABSURD   DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION, A  RUSE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE  BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL IN APPELLANT’S CAUSE BY COVER UP..

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR,  SAID SAME ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO CULPABLE ACCESSORY  AFTER THE FACT WITH VINCIBLE IGNORANCE,  ORDERED EXCESSIVE BAIL OF $5000  THEREBY VIOLATED APPELLANT’S  VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AGAINST EXCESSIVE BAIL AND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT,  AND THEREBY UNLAWFULLY JAILED AN  INNOCENT MAN TWICE VIOLATING THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS  DERIVING FROM THE SAME 2/23/17  DUI FALSE CONVICTION IN VIOLATION OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION:, MARCH 13, 2017, AND AGAIN MAY 13TH, ILLEGALLY  ENFORCING OUT OF  VINCIBLE IGNORANCE SAID DELICT 2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT WARRANT MARCH 14TH AT LAW FIVE,, AND AGAIN THE SPECIOUS, SPURIOUS, AND ABSURD  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER AB INITIO  MAY 13, 2017,  BOTH  2016 DUI/ FAILURE TO APPEAR WARRANT AND SAID CONTRADICTORY IN FACT NON EXISTENT DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER  RUSE BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL,  NULL AND VOID AB INITIO DERIVING FROM  2/23/17 FALSE SJCC CONVICTION VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE FRAUDULENT CONTEXT OF THE TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

 

MOREOVER, MACK’S AND LOVETT’S  INVALID, DELICT WARRANTS STILL STAND IN SPITE OF SAID  NULL AND VOID MOCK MAY 19TH, 2017 MC COURT, AT LAW FIVE ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.. THE MAY 19TH  MCC AT LAW FIVE COURT ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE, TO THE CONTRARY OF THE SOUND, IN A JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON MAY 19TH, AT LAW FIVE, INDEED  DISMISSED ALL JUSTICE FOR THE APPELLANT AND THEREBY SAID MAY 19TH ORDER DOES IN  FACT  MAROON THE APPELLANT IN CONTINUOUS JEOPARDY OF HIS LIBERTY, HAPPINESS, AND LIVELIHOOD. RES IPSO, IGITUR SAID EFFECT OF MAY 19TH ORDER AS NULL AND VOID IS EVIDENT BY WARRANTS ISSUED BY BOTH COURTS: MCC AND SJCC  FOR THE APPELLANT’S  ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT FOR 365 DAYS WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION IN THE SJC JAIL AFTER TIME SERVED IN  MC JAIL OR VICE VERSA DEPENDING ON WHO FALSELY ARRESTS THE APPELLANT FIRST ON SAID WARRANTS AND PROBATION VIOLATIONS BY LOVETT, MACK, AND TDPS.  (EXHIBIT).

 

SAID  MAY 19THHEARING, A MOCK HEARING,   VIOLATED THE APPELLANT’S  VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, RES IPSO, IGITUR   AS MOCK AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL, NULL AND VOID, THE JUDGEMENT COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE, IS WITHOUT FORCE OR LAW.

 

RES IPSO IGITUR LEGALLY NULL AND VOID  RE CAUSE NO. 2016-215- SAID SPECIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER RUSE BY LOVETT IS , RES IPSO, IGITUR REGARDLESS OF THE MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE, NONETHELESS  ALL SAID WARRANTS  BY MACK AND CONTRADICTORY FALLACIOUS PROBATION ORDERS BY LOVETT ARE STANDING STAND  STILL AFTER MAY 19TH, “ON THE BOOKS” TO BE ENFORCED AGAINST THE APPELLANT AND  CONTINUES TO BE UNLAWFULLY  SERVED UNDER SJC CSCD TERESA MILNER DIRECTOR AND LOREINA KLEVINSKI IN CONTEMPT OF A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 04/29/2017 HOLDING JOHN LOVETT’S SJSCS ORDER APRIL 6TH 2017 TO BE NULL AND VOID.(EXHIBIT) MOREOVER BY SAID WARRANTS AND SANCTIONS LEVELED AGAINST THE APPELLANT RE: SJCC 2016-215- JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL ORDERED, AND JUDGE WAYNE MACK, MCC, PERSONA SOL ORDERED, AND TDPS UNLAWFULLY ORDERED IN PERPETRATION OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD IN TANDEM WITH THE 2003 TEXAS DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM  AND TDPS LICENSE REVOCATION PROGRAM.

 

 

FACTUAL BASIS OF GROUNDS FOR SAID APPEAL AND COURT ORDER OF MANDAMUS RE” SAID MAY 19TH MC COURT ORDER AND SAID ESTOPPEL CASES.

 

SAID MAY 19TH  MC LAW FIVE ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE IS NOT OFFICIALLY PROMULGATED AND THEREFORE DOES NOT HAVE THE FORCE OF LAW IS EVIDENCED BY SAID  WARRANTS AND SANCTIONS AND PROBATION ORDERS STILL STANDING  ORDERED BY SJC AND MC COURTS AGAINST THE APPELLANT AFTER MAY 19TH, 2017 MC COURT LAW FIVE ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE ONLY 1) OF THE 2) AB INITIO CHARGES LEVELED AGAINST THE APPELLANT.   THERE ARE, CONTRARY TO THE MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE  ONE CHARGE – DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID-  NEVERTHELESS- STANDING WARRANTS FOR THE APPELLANTS ARREST FOR VIOLATION OF FAILURE TO PAY OUTSTANDING CASE FINES FOR CONVICTION IN MC COURT MARCH 13TH , JUDGE MACK, JUSTICE ONE, FOR DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID AND FAILURE TO MAINTAIN FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, BOTH FALSE CHARGES,  PROBATION FEES AND FAILURE TO APPEAR AT PROBATION MEETINGS DERIVING FROM  SAID SPURIOUS CONTRADICTORY DEFERRED ADJUDICATION  PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL,  ALL SAID IN VIOLATION OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION ,  ALONG WITH, TDPS WARRANT FOR CONVICTION FOR DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID  AND FAILURE TO TDPS SURCHARGES AND CASE OUTSTANDING FINES (EXHIBIT) FOR CONVICTION OF DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID CONVICTION  AND NO INSURANCE ARE EVIDENCE  SAID HEARING  AT LAW FIVE, MAY 19TH, 2017 WAS MOCK, AND SAID ORDER BY DAMICO TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE CASE NO. 17-322548 IS DISAVOWED UNKNOWINGLY AS   NULL AND VOID BY MACK, TDPS,  AND LOVETT PER CAUSAM  SAID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER IS MOCK AND NOT ENTERED INTO THE COURT RECORD,  AS SUCH,  NOT IN A COURT OF LAW PUBLICLY PROMULGATED,  RES IPSO, IGITUR THE MAY 19TH COURT ORDER DOES NOT HAVE THE FORCE OF LAW TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE EITHER NO.1 DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID, OR NO.2 THE ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION. MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE BEYOND BEING DELICT IN SUPPRESSING UNCONSTITUTIONALLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE I.E.,   NO.2, DID NOT PROMULGATE NO. 1 PUBLICLY IN COURT RECORD IN VIOLATION OF THE DEFENDANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS EXPOSING THE APPELLANT TO CONTINUING DOUBLE JEOPARDY.

 

IN SAID MAY 19TH MOCK MOTION TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE    ASS. DA.  UNCONSTITUTIONALLY SUPPRESSED  THE  AB INITIO PER SE CONTRADICTORY ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED  ADJUDICATION PROBATION OUT OF A JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO COVER UP LIABILTY DUE TO  MANIFEST JUDICIAL MALFEASANCE AB INITIO MARCH 13TH, AND MAY 14TH .  SAID  NO. 2.SUPPRESSED BY SAID MOCK MAY 19TH MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE BY ASS. MC DA IS SOLELY A CYNICAL RUSE TO DENY THE APPELLANT JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN ALL SAID CAUSE,  AB INITIO  CHARGE NO.2  WAS NOT HEARD IN THE MC COURT AND ENTERED INTO THE MC PROCEEDINGS OFFICIAL RECORD ON MAY 19TH,  RES IPSO, IGITUR,  BY UNLAWFUL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL SUPPRESSION  OF SAID AB INITIO ENHANCING CHARGE  OUT OF SAID JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO COVER UP LIABILITY DUE TO MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT IS  NOT OFFICIALLY AND PUBLICLY PROMULGATED VIA SAID COURT RECORD AND THEREFORE DOES NOT HAVE THE FORCE OF LAWFUL COURT ORDER.  SAID WARRANTS ISSUED AFTER MAY 19TH MOCK COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE PROVE, NONETHELESS,  1) THE DRIVING WHILE LICENSE CHARGE CONTAINED IN SAID MOCK MAY 19TH COURT ORDER WAS ALSO NOT ENTERED INTO COURT RECORD, OR AT LEAST NOT PUBLICLY PROMULGATED, AND THEREFORE NULL AND VOID, HAVING NOT LEGAL EFFECT.

 

 

THESE GROUNDS, AMONG MANY OTHERS TO BE SHOWN, ARE FACTUAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS FOR THE COURT TO GRANT THE APPELLANT’S PETITION WRIT OF MANDAMUS IN SAID APPEAL.

 

 

THE MC ASS. DA ON MAY 19TH, LAW FIVE, IN  VIOLATION OF  DUE PROCESS DENIED THE APPELLANT’S VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS BY  UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSING IN SAID MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE THE AB INITIO May 13th  2) ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION VIA  DRIVING WITH AN INVALID LICENSE.  A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF JUDICIAL INTEREST EXISTED AS PRETEXT TO SAID UNLAWFUL SUPPRESSION OF SAID AB INITIO MAY 13TH ENHANCING CHARGE BY  MC ASS. DA.  SAID SUPPRESSION OF AB INITIO NO.2 IN SAID RUSE MOTION AND ORDER TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE FOR THE APPELLANT AND DENY EQUITABLE REDRESS IN HIS CAUSE. AT THE SAME TIME, SAID COVER UP RUSE, ALSO SERVED TO   COVERED  UP LOVETT’S CRIMINAL FRAUD AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION PERPETRATED AGAINST THE APPELLANT BY LOVETT VIA  A  PRIMA FACIE CONTRADICTORY  DEFERRED  ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER  WHICH  CAUSED THE APPELLANT TO BE FALSELY  ARRESTED,  AND JAILED UNDER EXCESSIVE BOND AB INITIO, MAY 13TH.BY MC COURT ORDER, AT LAW FIVE.   SAID UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSED  ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION NO.2,   NOT BROUGHT BY TEXAS STATE’S PROSECUTION IN  MC COURT  AS A PUBLIC CHARGE, COULD NOT BE  ENTERED INTO SAID COURT RECORD MAY 19, 2017 AND WAS RES IPSO, IGITUR  COVERED UP, NOT PUBLICLY  GIVEN A  PUBLIC HEARING IN A COURT OF LAW IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT. RES IPSO  IGITUR, LOVETT’S SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION ORDER STILL STANDS  AS WELL AS ALL WARRANTS AND PENALTIES DERIVING FROM SAID ESTOPPEL CASES LEVELED AGAINST THE APPELLANT UNJUSTLY. RES IPSO, IGITUR, LOVETT’S CRIMES WERE COVERED UP BY SAID MAY 19TH ORDER, FURTHER OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR , APPELLANT  PRAYS  SAID COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION FORTHWITH,

 

AS HIS LIBERTY AND LIVELIHOOD ARE PLACED BY SAID MAY 19TH MOCK COURT ORDER IN DANGER OF CONTINUOUS JEOPARDY,  IMMINENTLY  SUBJECT (EXHIBIT ) TO CONTINUED UNABATED BY  SAID MAY 19TH ORDER  UNLAWFUL ARREST AND FALSE JAILING BY LOVETT, MACK, AND TDPS PER CAUSAM SAID MC ASS. DA MOTION TO UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESS SAID AB INITO ENHANCING CHARGE NO.2  BY THE MC ASS. DA WITH OUT FOREKNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT OF THE APPELLANT AND VIOLATED, THEREBY, THE APPELLANT’S  VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO PUBLICLY BE ACCUSED OF ALL CHARGES  AND FACE HIS ACCUSERS (JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES RE”2016-215-) IN A FAIR, SPEEDY,  PUBLIC TRIAL WITH  IMPARTIAL, JURIS PRUDENT,  NON ANTI CATHOLIC BIGOTED  JUDGE OR JURY AS WOULD BE THE CASE WITH MACK OR LOVETT.

 

 

SAID COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION  IS PRAYED FORTH PER CAUSAM  SAID  STATE OF AFFAIRS  JEOPARDIZES CONTINUOUSLY , NOW  A THIRD TIME THE APPELLANT’S LIBERTY BY FALSE ARREST, MOCK HEARING AND TRIAL, AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT BY  MC AND SJC LAW ENFORCEMENT AND COURTS IN COLLUSION WITH TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.  SAID SAD STATE OF AFFAIRS FOR THE APPELLANT IS ENABLED WHEN FIRST SAID TWO LEGALLY OXY MORONIC CONTRADICTORY ABSURD IN TANDEM CHARGES- NO.1 DRIVING WHILE  LICENSE INVALID ENHANCED BY NO.2 VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION  WAS SUSTAINED AGAINST  APPELLANT’S LEGAL OBJECTIONS AND COGENT ARGUMENT BY ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO IN SO CALLED  P.C. COURT, SUNDAY, MAY 14,  AT LAW FIVE IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANTS VITH. VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.  NOT BEING AFFORDED DUE DILIGENCE IN FACT, NOR  OWED JURISPRUDENCE IN ADJUDICATION IN LAW  BY  SAID MCC AT  LAW FIVE  COURT, THE APPELLANT WAS FALSELY JAILED IN MCJ FOR A SECOND TIME AB INITIO MAY 13TH, THE FIRST TIME SAID MARCH 13TH, 2017,  IN VIOLATION OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION BY  SAID CONTRADICTORY  SPURIOUS  SECOND DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER  WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING BY JOHN LOVETT,  PERSONA SOL.  AT SAID P.C. COURT HEARING AND RULING JUNCTURE, SAID  MC COURT. ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO,  AND  MC JAIL , MC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT CAN NOT IN ANY CASE  PLEAD INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE  IN FALSELY JAILING THE APPELLANT, AN INNOCENT MAN THREE TIMES FOR THE SAME CONVICTION..

 

 

BY SAID MAY 14TH MC P.C.COURT RULING BY ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO APPELLANT’S VIII AMENDMENT RIGHTS AGAINST CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT AND EXCESSIVE BAIL ARE VIOLATED  AS ARE BY UNLAWFULLY JAILING THE APPELLANT BY EXCESSIVE BAIL THE  WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN MCJ UNTIL MAY 19TH, 2017,   ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO, CANNOT PLEAD INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE  OR BEING  NAIVELY  AND INNOCENTLY “DUPED” BY JOHN LOVETT’S MOCK CHICANERY RUSES TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE BY COVER UP,  IN ALL THREE HEARINGS AFFORDED THE APPELLANT BY THE MC COURT, AT LAW FIVE ENDING IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN SAID  APPELLANT’S CAUSE DERIVING FROM AN ESTOPPEL RE:SJCC 2016 -215-.

 

IN ALL THREE SAID HEARINGS, DAMICO REFUSED THE APPELLANT DUE DILIGENCE TO  LEGAL FACT,  IN SPITE OF APPELLANT’S OBJECTION AND BRIEF LEGAL ARGUMENT.  THE THIRD AND FINAL HEARING MAY 19TH, DAMICO DID NOT ALLOW THE APPELLANT EVER TO SPEAK IN HIS OWN DEFENSE OR PRESENT IN HAND SJCC PROBATION DOCUMENT EXONERATING THE APPELLANT OF ALL SAID CHARGES, A VIOLATION OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT. ALL THREE HEARINGS   DAMICO RULED  AGAINST THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE SUSTAINING UNDERHANDEDLY BY SAID  UNLAWFUL SUPPRESSION COVERING UP LOVETT’S MALICIOUS CRIMINALTY DUE TO DAMICO’S OWN  CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE TO FLEE LIABILITY SUIT PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION..

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, SAID SUPPRESSION OF AB INITIO NO 1. IN MAY 19THY MOTION TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE OF ENHANCING CHARGE FROM PROSECUTION MOTION TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE, MAY 19,  IS A RUSE TO  COVER UP DAMICO’S JUCICIAL MALFEASANCE IN NOT AFFORDING DUE DILIGENCE TO LEGAL FACT IN APPELLANT’S CAUSE NOR  RENDERING OWED JURISPRUDENCE BY LAW IN ADJUDICATING THE APPELLANT’S RIGHTFUL PLEAS FOR EXONERATION DURING ALL THREE MCC HEARINGS DAMICO ACTING AS JUDGE.   SAID MOTION TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE RUSE ATTEMPTS  TO COVER UP, I.E. OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, IN A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST, FOR MC COURT, LAW FIVE AND MC JAIL AND MC SHERIFF’S DEPUTIES FOR REASON OF CULPABILITY PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, SUPPRESSION OF EXONERATING EVIDENCE AND FALSE JAILING OF THE APPELLANT AND TO  DENY  THE APPELLANT JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR FALSE JAILING AND ALL HARM  DONE DUE TO THE MC COURT AND MC SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT NOT GIVING DUE DILIGENCE TO FACT AND DISMISSAL OF JURIS PRUDENCE AB INITIO IN UNLAWFULLY ENFORCING LOVETT’S SAID DELICT AND SPURIOUS WARRANT AND CONTRADICTORY PROBATION ORDERS  AGAINST THE APPELLANT.

 

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, PURSUANT OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS THE APPELLANT PRAYS IN SAID CASE, SUMMARY JUDGEMENT BY THE COURT AND HONORABLE JUDGE WITH JUDICIAL STANDING  IN SAID APPEAL OF Re: 17-322548, MAY19, 2017, PURSUANT OF EQUITABLE REDRESS AND  PURSUANT OF JUSTICE  BY GRANTING THE APPELLANT’S  AB INITIO MOTION MAY 19TH, THAT SAME AB INITIO MOTION THE APPELLANT WAS FORBIDDEN BY THE COURT AND JUDGE AT LAW FIVE,  TO MAKE MOTION AT HEARING AND TO EVER SPEAK A WORD IN HIS DEFENSE,  OR PRESENT IN HAND SJCC PROBATION DOCUMENTS EXONERATING THE APPELLANT OF ALL CHARGES, IN SAID COURT BY SAID ACTING AS JUDGE, IN VIOLATION OF HIS  ITH AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.  THE APPELLANT IN APPEAL PRAYS THE HONORABLE JUDGE BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS IN SUMMARY JUDGEMENT TO GRANT THE APPELLANT’S  AB INITIO MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL CHARGES, CONVICTIONS, SENTENCES,  SANCTIONS, FINES, PROBATION  AND EXPUNGE CRIMINAL RECORD PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN SAID CAUSE AND SAID ESTOPPEL DERIVING FROM SJCC RE:2016 -215-  2/23/17  1ST DUI CAM +.15  JOHN LOVETT PERSONA SOL UNLAWFULLY ORDERED

 

 

APPELLANT PRO SE PRAYS THE COURT TO ISSUE ARREST WARRANTS FOR SAID  ALLEGED FELONS LISTED AT 7) ABSTARCT  IN THE APPELLANT’S APPEAL FOR VIOLATION OF SAID APPELLANT’S CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION PURSUANT OF APPELLANT’S FALSE ARRESTS, BASED ON FALSE DUI CONVICTION-FEB. 23, 2017 – SJCC ACTING AS JUDGE WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING JOHN LOVETT AND SJCC ACCOMPLICES, SJC DEPUTY SHERIFF, AND TDPSHPO ACCOMPLICES SWEARING  TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT IN A COURT OF LAW , MANDATING THEREBY FALSE IMPRISONMENTS IN MC JAIL, AND SJC JAIL, ILLICIT IN AB SENTIA SENTENCING BY LOVETT PERSONA SOL OF THE APPELLANT TO 365 DAYS IN SJC JAIL FOR 1ST DUI CAM, TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT,  AND PROBATION AND COURT FINES LEVELED AND ARREST WARRANTS STILL ACTIVE BROUGHT ABOUT BY LOVETT’S AND ACCOMPLICES’ COMMISSION OF AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME AGAINST THE APPELLANT.

 

 

RES IPSO IGITUR, SAID APPELLANT PRO SE IN CASE NO. 17-322548 MAKES CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SAID SPURIOUS MALEFACTORS AND PRAYS SAID HONORABLE JUDGE TO ISSUE SAID COURT  ORDER OF PROTECTION   IN  EQUITABLE REDRESS TO BAN HENCEFORTH  ISSUE AND ENFORCEMENT  OF  ALL AND ANY  INVALID WARRANTS BY LOVETT AND MACK, BOTH AB INITIO ACTING AS PERSONA SOL WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING  IN THE APPELLANT’S  SAID CASES,   FOR APPELLANT’S  IMMEDIATE ARREST AND EXPEDITION TO THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL  TO BE JAILED INDEFINITELY WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF BAIL, OR  TO SAN JACINTO COUNTY JAIL TO BE JAILED FOR 365 DAYS WITH NO POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION, UNLAWFULLY  WARRANTED BY STANDING ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT,  AND MACK, PERSONA SOL .

 

RES  IPSO IGITUR,  PURSUANT OF EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR THE APPELLANT SIC  NOT TO BE SUBJECT TO FURTHER  GRAVE PHYSICAL, PROFESSIONAL, PERSONAL FINANCIAL HARM DUE TO MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES DERIVING FROM CAUSE NO. 2016-215-SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT AN ESTOPPEL, 2/23 2017, 1ST DUI FALSE CONVICTION UNLAWFULLY TRIED IN ABSENTIA  SEC. 49.04(C) PC, CJS# 54040014 – CLASS A MISDEMEANOR BAC + 1.5 AND THE APPELLANT  SENTENCED UNLAWFULLY  APRIL 6TH IN ABSENTIA WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/ DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING IN THE SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT, COLD SPRINGS, TEXAS SJC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT PRESIDING AS PERSONA SOL

 

RES  IPSO, IGITUR APPELLANT PRO SE MAKES CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND PRAYS SAID HONORABLE JUDGE MAKE EQUITABLE  REDRESS PER CAUSAM  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND THEREBY  ISSUE WARRANTS FOR THE ARRESTS OF SAID ALLEGED FELONS WITH PROBABLE CAUSE HERE GIVEN, JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES CHARGED WITH SAID FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE PURSUANT OF EQUITABLE REDRESS AND JUSTICE.

 

 

 

INFORMATION:

 

 

 

APPELLANT PRO SE FATHER CHRISTOPHER DANIEL TERRY, O.P.  APPEALS  AND PETITIONS  WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE HONORABLE KATHLEEN HAMILTON, MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF JUDGES, (AND..OR JUDGE OR JUDGES HAVING CONSTISTUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT STANDING TO GRANT SUMMARY JUDGEMENT ON APPEAL AND GRANT SAID PETITION OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS  IN CASE NO. 17-322548  AND  THE COURT TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL CHARGES, CONVICTIONS, SENTENCING, SANCTIONS, FINES  AND PROBATION AND EXPUNGE  CRIMINAL RECORD IN ALL SAID  CASES: NO. 17-322548 DERIVING FROM AN ESTOPPEL SJCC, 2/23/17 CONVICTION 1ST DUI +.15 CAM OFFENSE DATE APRIL 4, 2016, AND NO. 1CC18542 DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID-DL, 4/13/17  AGAIN PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, I.E. FALSE  IMPRISONMENT, MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE, IN VIOLATION UNDER COLOR OF LAW OF APPELLANT PRO SE, FATHER CHRISTOPHER DANIEL TERRY, ORDER OF PREACHERS, IST, IVTH VTH, VITH, VIIITH, XVIIITH, XXITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND THE APPELLANT DEMANDS A JUDGEMENT BY THE COURT IN  EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR TIME OF FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ALL HARM DONE IN ANY MANNER DRIVING FROM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT IN THE FRAUDULENT CONTEXT OF THE  TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

SAID TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD is proven  IN TANDEM AS THE CONTEXT OF JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF APPELLANT  BY SAID  EVITDENTIARY SJCC AND TDPS DOCUMENTATION  IPSO RES.IGITUR ,  SAID MALEFACTORS REVENUE FRAUD  BY THEIR MALICIOUS DUI PROSECUTION OF THE  APPELLANT AS ATTESTED TO BY  SAID DOCUMENT EVIDENCE IN EXHIBIT   involved five separate elements: (1) a false statement of a material fact:  TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT,  (2) knowledge on the part of the defendant that the statement is untrue, (3) intent on the part of the defendant to deceive the alleged victim, (4) justifiable reliance by the alleged victim on the statement-MPM 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY, and (5) injury to the alleged victim as a result

 

 

 

IN THE NAME OF WE THE PEOPLE AND BY AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND GOD GIVEN RIGHT AS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN

 

 

 

COMES NOW THE UNDERSIGNED APPELLANT PRO SE, FATHER CHRISTOPHER DANIEL TERRY, O.P. DOES PRESENT UNTO MOUNTGOMERY COUNTY HONORABLE JUDGE KATHLLEN HAMILTON

 

THAT ON MAY 14TH AT SO-CALLED PROBABLE CAUSE COURT, AND THE 19TH OF MAY, 2017 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW 5, PAUL DAMICO ACTING AS JUDGE ARRAIGNMENT HEARING RE CASE NO.17-322548

 

SAID APPELLANT, THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE IS DENIED HIS IST AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY  IMPARTIAL NOT RELIGIOUSLY BIGOTED AND  ANTI CATHOLIC JUDGE AND JURY IN  SAID COURT BY ACTING JUDGE NOT ALLOWING SAID APPELLANT PRO SE, THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE IN SAID CAUSE,  IN SAID COURT OF LAW  ARRAIGNMENT HEARING ON MAY 19TH  EVER TO SPEAK A WORD IN HIS DEFENSE AND MAKE AB INITIO MOTION, OR PRESENT IN HAND SJCC PROBATION DOCUMENTS TO THE JUDGE AS EVIDENCE EXONORATING HIM OF ALL AB INITIO MAY 13TH CHARGES. THE APPELLANT AT SAID MAY 19TH HEARING WAS DENIED TO HAVE A FAIR AND PUBLIC HEARING OF ALL CHARGES LEVELLED AB INITIO MAY 13TH AGAINST THE APPELLANT FALSELY AND LAWFULLY.

 

MOREOVER, WITHOUT THE DEFENDANT’S FOREKNOWLEDGE OR  RATIFICATION,  BEFORE OR AFTER ARRAIGNMENT HEARING MAY19TH, MONTGOMERY ASS. DISTRICT ATTORNEY MADE MOTION AT MAY  19TH ARRAIGNMENT HEARING TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE  OFFENSE CASE NO. 17-322548 E: DRIVING W/LIC INV. W/PREV CONV/SUS/W/O FIN RES 9CLASS B MISDEMEANOR . SAID MOTION TO DISMISS SAID CAUSE  BY ASS. DA WAS NOT EVER RATIFIED BY SAID DEFENDANT PRO SE THEN  IN SAID  COURT OF LAW BEFORE A JUDGE, BEFORE OR AFTER HEARING.  SAID APPELLANT IN APPEAL AND BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOES NOT RATIFY SAID MOTION TO DISMISS  IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE CASE NO. 17-322548 SHOWN TO BE MOCK AND A RUSE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE, BUT IN APPEAL BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS THE COURT  OVER TURN IT.. RES IPSO, IGITUR,  THE ONLY JUST AND ACCEPTABLE SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MOTION PURSUANT OF JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS TO BE RATIFIED BY THE  APPELLANT PRO SE IN APPEAL BY  WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS THE  AB INITIO  MOTION APPELLANT SOUGHT TO MAKE AT HEARING MAY 19TH,  BUT WAS DENIED  EVEN TO SPEAK  OF IN SAID HEARING  IN EXERCISE OF HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO SAY SO: THAT IS  MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT  TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE  ALL CHARGES, CONVICTIONS, SENTENCING, FINES AND PROBATION  PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  IN SAID CASE AND ALL SAID ESTOPPEL  OF  SAID MAY 19TH HEARING  ARRAIGNMENT  CASE.

 

 FACTUAL BASIS IN APPEAL OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND RIGHTEOUSNESS OF MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ET AL. PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

 

 

THE APPELLANT WAS FOR SAID MAY 19TH ARRAIGNMENT HEARING , FALSELY  ARRESTED  SATURDAY,  MAY 13, 2017 IN WILLIS BY M.C. DEP. SHERIFFS FOR DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID LICENSE AFTER BEING LAWFULLY STOPPED (BUT NOT TICKETED FOR AN EXPIRED REGISTRATION STICKER) A LICENSE SUSPENSION  UNLAWFULLY THE APPELLENT IN APPEAL VOLO CONTEDERE DERIVING FROM  FALSE CONVICTION 2/23/17 DUI +.15 CAM IN SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT,  JUDGE JOHN LOVETT PRESIDING, PERSONA SOL.

 

 

AT PROCESSING IN MCJ, APPELLANT WAS UNLAWFULLY ALIENATED FROM EXONERATING  SJCCOURT PROBATION DOCUMENT EVIDENCE OF SAID  AB INITO MAY 13TH CHARGES THE APPELLANT HELD CLOSELY IN HAND AT THE TIME OF HIS ARREST.  TELLING THE ARRESTING DEPUTIES AB INITIO THE NATURE OF THE DOCUMENTS, BY LAW THE MCSD DEPUTIES ALLOWED THE APPELLANT TO KEEP SAID EXONERATING COURT DOCUMENTS IN HAND.   BUT AT PROCESSING  AT MC JAIL, SAID SAME DEPUTIES  OVERSAW THE UN LAWFUL ALIENATION  FROM IN HAND TO “PROPERTY” APART OF SAID EXONERATING COURT DOCUMENTS IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S   VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL, AND IN VIOLATION OF  IVTH AMENDMENT,  PROHIBITING  ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF PROPERTY UNDER COLOR OF LAW,  RES IPSO, IGITUR,  ON MAY 13TH, 2017 AT THE MC JAIL MC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT DEPUTIES CONFISCATED THE APPELLANT’S    IN HAND LEGAL SJCC DEFENSE DOCUMENTS  EXONERATING  THE APPELLANT OF ALL CHARGES TO BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDUCE PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION THEREBY.

 

WHEN APPELLANT OBJECTED TO THE UNLAWFUL CONFISCATION OF PREVIOUSLY IN HAND  SAID EXONERATING SJCC COURT  PROBATION DOCUMENTS NOT WITH STANDING A REASONABLE LAWFUL SEARCH DURING PROCESSING, THE ARRESTING DEPUTIES REPLIED THE APPELLANT’S  LEGAL DOCUMENTS WOULD BE RETURNED WITHIN A FEW  HOURS AT MOST AND  THE APPELLANT WILL BE RELEASED ON A P.R. BOND  FOR THE AB INITIO CHARGE OF DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID. BARRING ANY WARRANTS OR PROBATION VIOLATIONS.  THE APPELLANT WAS ASKED BY SAID DEPUTIES THEN IF HE WAS CURRENTLY UNDER PROBATION.  THE APPELLANT REPLIED HIS SJCC SJC JAIL TIME PROBATION WAS ABROGATED ALBEIT UNOFFICIALLY AND UNLAWFULLY BY  SJC SHERIFF’S DEPUTIES  IN THE SAME MANNER  OF THE MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE IN SUMMARY JUDGEMENT BY ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO,  UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSED FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND RECORD THE EXONERATING MAY 13TH AB INITIO  CONTRADICTORY ENHANCING CHARGE  OF VIOLATION  OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT PERSONA SOL IN CONTRADICTORY TANDEM WITH THE CHARGE OF THE APPELLANT  DRIVING WITH LICENSAE INVALID.

 

IN FACT, THE WEDNESDAY BEFORE THE APPELLANT’S SAID MAY 13TH ARREST , THE APPELLANT WAS RELEASED WITHOUT SJC COURT ORDER OR WRITTEN EXPLANATION FROM THE SJC JAIL BY SJC JAIL DEPUTIES AND TOLD SIMPLY “THE SJC JAIL HAS NO RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU” BY A  SJC JAILER.  THE APPELLANT CONCLUDED AT THE TIME OF HIS RELEASE AFTER ONLY  SERVING  25 DAYS OF AN  AB INITIO 365 DAY SENTENCE ORDERED UNLAWFULLY BY LOVETT PERSONA SOL DERIVING FROM A VOLO CONTENDERE “FALSE” 2/23/17 IST DUI CONVICTION ENHANCED TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR +.15 BAC TDPSFC LAB REPORT.  POSSIBLY SJC JAIL DEPUTIES  REFUSED TO FURTHER PARTICIPATE IN THE JAILING OF AN INNOCENT MAN, THE APPELLANT, OUT OF FEAR OF PERSONAL LIABILITY  IN  SUIT PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PERSECUTION TO BE BROUGHT BY THE APPELLANT. MOREOVER,  JUST AS THE  SPURIOUS MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE,  SJC JAIL DEPUTIES MADE NO OFFICIAL AND PUBLIC RECORD OF ABBROGATING LOVETT’S APRIL 6TH  SENTENCING AND A PRIMA FACIE LUDICROUS PROBATION .    ORDER IN FREEING THE APPELLANT AT THAT TIME FROM FALSE JAILING OR THEREBY MADE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TAGAINST JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, IN DEFENSE OF THE APPELLANT  FOR LOVETT’S MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELANT AND FALSE JAILING THEREBY OF THE APPELLANT IN MISUSE OF SJC JAIL,  LIKEWISE, SAID MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE SOLELY ONE OF THE TWO AB INITIO CHARGES LEVELLED MAY 13TH AGAINST THE APPELLANT, NO 1)  DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID,  AND NOT DISMISS IN THE SAME HEARING NO. 2)  SAID CONTRADICTORY ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION  PROBATION DID THEREBY BY MAY 19TH RUSE  UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESS AND HIDE BY SAID MAY 19TH RUSE DID OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE IN FREEING HIM FROM FALSE JAILING, AND TO THIS END ENHANCING AB INITIO CHARGE NO.2 BEING UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSED AND  HIDDEN  WAS VIA MAY 19TH RUSE IS NOT RAISED AT SAID HEARING AS A MATTER OF COURT RECORD AND PUBLIC HEARING AT LAW FIVE COURT MAY 19TH.,  ET ALIA IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. RES IPSO, IGITUR SAID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE DID NOT  PUBLICLY, OFFICALLY, NOR LEGALLY IN COURT HEARING OR BY COURT ORDER AT LAW FIVE ABROGATE  EITHER THE SPURIOUS APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT  BY DELICT WARRANT OF WHICH THE APPELLANT WAS FIRST ARRESTED AND FALSELY JAILED ON MARCH 13TH, 2017 BY MC COURT AT LAW FIVE, NOR  SAID SECOND A PRIMA FACIE CONTRADICTORY AND SPURIOUS  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT, I.E. NO. 2,  CONTRADICTING SAID FIRST APRIL 6TH  PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT AS A RUSE BY LOVETT TO COVER  UP SAID  APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER. ET ALIA, ALL SAID CONSTITUTES COLLUSION TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANTS CASE BORN OUT OF A MUTUAL CONFLICT OF JUDICIAL INTEREST BY ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO,  AND PERSONA SOL, JOHN LOVETT IN OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE BY FIRST WRONGFULLY ENFORCING AND THAN COVERING UP SAID APRIL 6TH   PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT PERSONA SOL, AB INITIO MARCH 13TH  AND THEN HIDING AND COVERING UP FROM PUBLIC EXPOSURE IN HEARING IN A COURT OF LAW, SAID SECOND A PRIMA FACIE CONTRADICTORY DEFERRED ADJUICATION PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT BY RUSE 19TH COURT ORDER TO FREE THE APPELLANT FROM MC JAIL.

 

IN THE SAME MANNER BORN OUT OF A JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO ESCAPE PERSONALLY ALL SUIT LIABILITY FOR JAILING AN INNOCENT MAN PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION,  THE MC COURT AND MCSD AT MCJ, IN FREEING THE APPELLANT FROM JAIL, JUST AS  THE SJC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT IN FREEING THE APPELLANT FROM SJC JAIL DID NOT CONFRONT IN PUBLIC HEARING AND ON COURT RECORD LOVETT AS PERSONA SOL  FOR HIS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT AND HOLD  LOVETT LEGALLY ACCOUNTABLE FOR LOVETT’S AS PERSONA SOL, CRIMINAL MISUSE OF THE SJC JAIL AND THE MCC JAIL ALIKE IN FELONIOUS UDICIAL MALFEASANCE VIA IMPERSONATING A SJCC JUDGE, AS PERSONA SOL IN REGARD  TO THE FALSE IMPRISONMENT OF THE APPELLANT.

RES IPSO, IGITUR, THE MAY 19TH RUSE COVER UP OF LOVETT’S TWO CONTRADICTORY PROBATION ORDERS IN ALL SAID INSTANCES WAS NEVER  FOR INTEREST OF JUSTICE, BUT BORN OUT OF COLLUSSION AFTER THE FACT IN A JUDICIAL CONFLCIT OF INTEREST TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELANT’S CASE MERELY TO FLEE PERSONAL LIABILITY AS ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT AVOIDING SUIT FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION WHILE VINCIBLE IGNORANT,

 

THE SJC AND MCC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT  JAIL DEPUTIES ALIKE ALONG WITH THE MC COURT AT LAW FIVE, ARE STILL REMISS VIA RUSE MAY19TH, ORDER IN FREEING THE APPELLANT FROM JAIL EVEN NOW IN OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, AND THERBY ARE  RENOUNCING THEIR SWORN DUTY TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT BY SAID MAY 19TH RUSE STILL. THEREBY THEY  DID NOT OFFICIALLY, PUBLICLY, AND LAWFULLY ABROGATE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE  THE APPELLANT’S CONTINUOUIS UNLAWFUL JAILING BY PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL AND  CHARGE AND ARREST LOVETT THERE BY.  SAID RUSE MAY 19TH ORDER DOES NOT UPHOLD THE LAW TO ANY DEGREE  AND DEFEND THE INNOCENT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE  IN NOT CHARGING AND ARRESTING LOVETT AND HIS ACCOMPLICES FOR MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTING THE APPELLANT IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF TDPS COMMISSIONER’S  DUI/POM  REVENUE FRAUD.

 

RES IPSO IGITUR, BOTH MC COURT LAW FIVE BY RUSE MAY 19TH COURT ORDER AND SJC  SHERIFF DEPARTMENT AUTHORITIES  ARE STILL REMAIN  REMISS IN THEIR SWORN DUTY TO DEFEND AND TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE , IN A CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO AVOID LIABILITY IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SUIT,  IN THE SAME MANNER TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE WHILE AT THE SAME MOMENT FREEING THE APPELLANT  FROM FALSE JAILING.

 

RES IPSO IGITUR, SAID BOTH, ET ALIUS,  IN COLLUSION CONTINUOUSLY SUBJECT VIA MAY 19TH RUSE,  THE APPELLANT TO DOUBLE JEOPARDY  BEING ARRESTED BY MC DEPUTIES ON MAY 13TH, 2017 FOR  AN UNLAWFUL SANCTION ORDERED BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL RE2016-215-SJCC-DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID  AND MARCH 13TH, 2017 AFTER THE FIRST ENFORCING AN UNLAWFUL SPURIOUS PROBATION ORDER APRIL 6TH, 2017 BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, COVERED UP BY MAY 19TH RUSE ENFORCING AB INITIO MAY 13TH, A SECOND SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT TO COVER OVER LOVETT’S CRIMES AGAINST THE APPELLANT BOTH CONTRADICTORY PROBATION ORDERS BY LOVETT  WERE NEVER LEGALLY RATIFIED BY THE APPELLANT AND DO NOT EXIST IN FACT IN ANY MANNER, ONLY “ON THE BOOKS” SO TO SPEAK.

 

 

 

 

 

TO CONTINUE..

 

AT PROCESSING AT MC JAIL, MAY 13TH,  REPORTING TO MC ARRESTING DEPUTIES THAT IN SAID MANNER SAID SJC PROBATION JAILING WAS ABROGATED THE WEDNESDAY BEFORE,  FALSELY CONFIDENT AT THAT INSTANCE THE APPELLANT WOULD BE RELEASED MOMENTARILY ON P.R. BAIL FOR THE CHARGE OF DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID AND HAVING SAID EXONERATING SJCC  DOCUMENTS RETURNED IN HAND, THEREBY, HAVING BEEN  ASKED BY DEPUTIES IF THE APPELLANT WAS CURRENTLY UNDER PROBATION,  SAID  DEPUTY THEN LEFT TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE APPELLANT’S  PROBATION STATUS  ONLY TO RETURN SHORTLY THERE AFTER AND TELL THE APPELLANT THE APPELLANT WOULD BE HELD IN CUSTODY  AT MCJ  ON THE ENHANCING CHARGE  OF VIOLATING A  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION  ORDERED BY SAID  SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT AIN BLATANT CONTRACTION OF SAID IST DUI CONVICTION  2/23/17, APRIL 4TH 2016, 2/23/17 SJCJ RE 2016 -215-.  THE APPELLANT COULD NOT BELIEVE HIS EARS.  THESE TWO CHARGES IN TANDEM ARE CLEARLY CONTRADICTORY AND A PRIMA FACIE LUDICROUS  LEGAL NON SEQUITOR AND LOGICAL OXYMORON.

 

 

BEFORE THE APPELLANT’S MAY 19TH  ARRAIGNMENT HEARING AND BEFOR MAY 14TH PROBABLE CAUSE COURT AT LAW FIVE, ON MAY 13TH THE DAY OF HIS ARREST, HAVING AT PROCESSING SAID EXONERATING SJCC LEGAL DOCUMENTS  ILLEGALLY SEARCHED AND SEIZED OUT OF HIS HANDS BY MCSD AT MC JAIL IN VIOLASTION OF THE APPELLANT’S IVTH, VTH, AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, THE APPELLANT THEREFORE WROTE  IN ALL TWO  INMATE GRIEVANCES  OBJECTING TO  UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIOLATION OF HIS Vth AND VIth AMENDMENT RIGHTS BECAUSE OF FALSE ARREST, ILLEGAL SEARCH AND BY SAID UNLAWFUL SEIZURE OF SAID SJCC DOCUMENTS , AND VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS  BECAUSE OF ALIENATION OF HIS LEGAL DEFENSE PAPERS BY UNLAWFUL AND UNWARRANTED CONFISCATION BY MC DEPUTIES AT PROCESSING.   IN VIOLATION OF  THE APPELLANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, SAID EXONERATING SJC COURT DOCUMENTS WERE NOT RETURNED TO THE APPELLANT IN MC JAIL CUSTODY   BEFORE  SO CALLED  PROBABLE CAUSE COURT  HEARING ON MAY 14TH,  SUNDAY 9:00 A,M, AT LAW 5, M.C.J.  LEAVING THE APPELLANT BEREFT OF SAID EXONERATING SJCC  DOCUMENTS TO  ENTER INTO EVIDENCE FOR HIS EXONERATION  IN HEARING BEFORE SAID ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO AT LAW FIVE IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANTS WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS..

 

MORE OVER, IN SPITE OF SAID GRIEVANCES BEING TIMELY AND MARKED URGENT FILED THE SJCC EXONERATING DOCUMENTS WERE NOT RETURNED UNTIL THREE DAYS  AFTER SAID P.C. HEARING BY  MC JAIL SHERIFF DEPUTIES VISIBLY INTIMIDATED THAT THE APPELLANT EXPRESSED VIOLATION OF  HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIA SAID TWO GRIEVANCES AS DEFENDANT PRO SE.

 

VIA  UNLAWFUL ALIENATION OF SAID SJCC  EXONERATION DOCUMENTS IN HAND TO BE PRESENTED AT HEARING IN A COURT OF LAW, AND THEREBY FALSELY JAILED WITHOUT VERIFIBALE PROBABLE CAUSE, UNDER COLOR OF LAW THE APPELLANT’S  VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHT  WAS THERBY VIOLATED BY EXCESSIVE BAIL ORDERED BY ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO AT SAID P.C. COURT HEARING.

 

FURTHERMORE, APPELLANT PRO SE IS ALSO ALSO DENIED AT THE SAME TIME  BY SAID ILLEGAL CONFISCATION  BY MCJ  DEPUTIES OF SAID EXONERATING  SJCC DOCUMENTS AT HAND, A SECOND TIME ON THE FEDERAL LEVEL,  THE APPELLANT ‘S  WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, IN BEING  DENIED ACCESS BY SAID ILLEGAL CONFISCATION AND FALSE JAILING AT MC JAIL  TO SAID  FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURT  SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXASCOURT DOCUMENTS TO COMPLETE AND TO FILE WITH THE CLERK FOR THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN TEXAS APPELLANT PRO SE’S  PRIEVIOUSLY ALMOST COMPLETED PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. & 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY, BY SAID WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS COURT DOCUMENTS  ALBEIT CONFISCATED ILLEGALLY AT THE SAMETIME  WITH ALL SAID SJCC EXONERATING DOCUMENTS.

 

THE DEFENDANT HAS THE WRIT TO APPEAL SAID THIS APPEAL AND PETITION OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR BY MC COURT AT LAW FIVE, AND BY MC SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT STILL REMISS IN THEIR SWORN DUTY TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT, THE APPELLANT IS TILL PLACED IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY ON BOTH A FEDERAL AND STATE LEVEL VIOLATING HIS WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL SEIZURE OF SJCC AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CRIMINAL FEDERAL COURT EXONERATING DOCUMENTS. THIS INJUSTICE IS AGGRAVATED BY THE MAY 19TH RUSE AT LAW FIVE, NOT IN ANY MANNER RELIEVED.

 

THE APPELLANT, BEREFT OF EXONERATING L SJC COURT DOCUMENTS TO ENTER INTO EVIDENCE   AND UNLAWFULLY  JAILED AB INITIO MAY 13, 2017   THAN AS  DEFENDANT PRO SE MANACLED WAS FORCED TO APPEAR IN SO CALLED  PROBABLE CAUSE COURT, AT LAW FIVE,  SUNDAY, 9:00 A.M.  UNDER SAID ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO.  THIS WAS THE SECOND HEARING AND ODERING BEFORE ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO FOR THE SAME OFFENSE RE: 2016 -215- SJCC, VIOLATING THE  DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION, THE APPELLANT, THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE, APPEARED IN HEARING AT MC COURT, AT LAW FIVE BEFORE ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO, THE FIRST TIME BEING  GOOD FRIDAY, MARCH 14TH, THE SECOND, SUNDAY, MAY 14TH, 2017.

 

AT THE BEGINNING OF SAID PROBABLE CAUSE COURT, SUNDAY MAY 14, 2017 ACTING AS JUDGE PAUL DAMICO MADE A STOCK PRE HEARING PROBABLE CAUSE RANT INTIMIDATING AND THREATENING DEFENDANTS, ALL PRO SE WITH NO LEGAL COUNSEL, NOT TO SPEAK A WORD IN THEIR DEFENSE OR THEY WILL BE SENT BACK TO JAIL EFFECTIVELY  CHILLING THERE BY  THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND VITH AMENDMENT AT HEARING.   WITH TREPIDATION THEN, SAID DEFENDANT PRO SE   “DARED” TO  BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT PURSUANT OF HIS WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, HIS VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT AFTER THE FACT DENIED HAVING EXONERATING SJCC DOCUMENTS ILLEGALLY CONFISCATED BY MCJ  DEPUTIES  AT PROCESSING THE DAY BEFORE.  THE DEFENDANT PRO SE  MADE ARGUMENT  THE  SAID AB INITIO TWO  CHARGES FOR HIS  FALSE ARREST ON MAY 13TH – AND FALSE JAILING  IN MCJ:  1) DRIVING WHILE  LICENSE INVALID , 2) ENHANCED AS A VIOLATION OF  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION AGREEMENT VIOLATION THEREBY, A PRIMA FACIE MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY  CHARGES  DERIVING FROM  A DUI CONVICTION RE: 2016 -215- 2/23/17  AND THEREBY THE TWO SAID CHARGES AB INITO ARE MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY AND  A NON SEQUITOR IN RESPECT TO ENHANCEMENT OF BAIL AND LAWFULNESS OF BOTH CHARGES BROUGHT IN TANDEM.  THE VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION BY DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID IS A NON SEQUITOR IN THAT BOTH THE SUSPENSION OF LICENSE AND THE SPURIOUS NON EXISTENT DEFERRED ADJUDICATION ORDER BY LOVETT BOTH DERIVED FROM 2/23/17  FALSE DUI CONVICTION SJCC RE:2016 -215-  RES IPSO, IGITUR LOGICALLY  PRECLUDES  A SUBSEQUENT DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT  AFTER SAID DUI CONVICTION AND SANCTIONS, LICENSE SUSPENSION THEREFORE .

 

 

RES IPSO IGITUR, THE DEFENDANT PRO SE PRESENTED A PRIMA FACIE SAID CONTRADICTION AS A LOGICAL ABSURDITY AND INTANDEM LEVEL SAID MUTUALLY CONTRADICTING CHARGES IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE  FOR THE STATE PROSECUTION TO SHOW PROBABLE CAUSE AND THEREBY TO BRING VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION AS  AN “ENHANCING” CHARGE IN TANDEM WITH DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID BOTH DERIVING FROM SAID CONVICTION  2/23/17 SJCC. A LEGAL ABSURDITY AND NON SEQUITOR,

 

THE APPELLANT MANACLED AND FALSELY IMPRISONED, BEREFT OF SJCC  EXONERATING DOCUMENTS OF APRIL 6TH SJCC DUI CONVICTION PROBATION ORDER IN CONTRADICITION TO SAID ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION ORDE , WAS  NEVER THE LESS UNLAFULLY CHARGED “WITH PROBABLE CAUSE” BY SAID COURT AND ACTING AS JUDGE AT LAW 5, FOR  DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID,  I,E. SUSPENSION OF LICENSE,  A PENALTY FOR SAID DUI CONVICTION AND IN THE SAME HEARING   SAID CHARGE ENHANCED FOR VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION  ORDER BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL IN CONTRADICITON OF THE APRIL 6TH DUI CONVICITON PROBATION ORDER.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, NO 2) ET ALIA IN A PRIMA FACIE CONTRADICITON ENTAILS THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT TRIED AND CONVICTED BY LOVETT OF 2016 DUI AB INITIO, NOR CONVICTED OF APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI RE:2016 -215-SJCC..

 

BEREFT OF EXONERATING SJCC LEGAL DOCUMENTS IN HAND AT SAID P.C. HEARING, NOT GIVEN BACK TO THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT, NEVERTHELESS,  THE APPELLANT ATTEMPTED IN A FEW CONCRETE SENTENCES  TO MAKE  MC COURT AT LAW FIVE  AND ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO AT SAID P.C. HEARING SEE REASON AND RIGHT IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE AND EXONERATE THE APPELLANT OF ALL SPURIOUS CHAREGS THEREBY.  AS SAID, SAID TWO CHARGES ARE MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY AND DO NOT ENHANCE EACH OTHER, BUT RATHER PARADOXICALLY EXONERATE THE DEFENDANT OF BOTH CHARGES.

 

ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO GAVE HEARING AT LAW FIVE, AND ASKED ONE NON SEQUITOR QUESTION IN RESPONSE OF THE DEFENDANT “I THOUGHT YOU SAID YOU WERE NEVER UNDER PROBATION.” TO WHICH THE DEFENDANT RESPONDED, I DID NOT SAY THAT.  THE DEFENDED HAD SAID HE WAS UNDER PROBATION FOR CONVICTION-SAID APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT FOR A CONVICTION -A COPY OF SAID APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER WAS AMONG THE SJCC DOCUMENTS  ILLEGALLY SEIZED FROM THE APPELLANT THE APPELLANT WOULD HAVE PRESENTED TO THE JUDGE AS EXONERATING EVIDENCE -OF COURSE NULLIFIES THE CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION. WITH DISDAINING TUNNEL VISION AND, DISMISSIVE OF  DUTIFUL DUE DILIGENCE TO FACTUAL BASIS ACTING AS JUDGE AND IN EARSHOT OF ASS. DA. PRESENTING  PROBABLE CAUSE RESPONSE, “THIS IS WEIRD, ” SOWING NO JURISPRUDENCE , ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO SUSTAINED THE MUTUALLY INVALIDATING IN TANDEM  SAID TWO CHARGES AS ENHANCING , NOT MUTUALLY EXONERATING THE APPELLANT,  AND SET BAIL AT $5,000,  ENHANCED PER CAUSAM  VIOLATION OF THE MANIFESTLY SPURIOUS  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION WHILE  DRIVING WITH  LICENSE INVALID.

 

RES IPSO\, IGITUR, SAID  UNLAWFUL EXCESSIVE BAIL SET AT $5,000 BY DAMICO ACTING AS JUDGE IS   A VIOLATION UNDER COLOR OF LAW OF DEFENDANT’S VIIIth AMENDMENT RIGHT AGAINST EXCESSIVE  BAIL. MOREOVER,  DEFENDANT PRO SE’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WAS VIOLATED  IN SAID  COURT’S FAILURE TO PROPERLY AND JUSTLY  ADJUDICATE THE ACTUAL EXISTENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE AT THE DEFENDANT’S HEARING VIA A DILIGENT AND REASONABLE CONSIDERATION OF THE APPELLANT’S OBJECTION IN HEARING SAID TWO CHARGES ARE  MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY AND EXCLUSIVE CHARGES AND DO NOT ENHANCE EACH OTHER AND WARRANT  EXCESSIVE L BAIL THEREBY  SET BY SAID  COURT ORDER, BY ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO, AND NOT REACHABLE BY THE DEFENDANT PRO SE DUE TO A VOW OF POVERTY, ALL PREMISED AFTER THE FACT ON SAID ACTING AS JUDGE VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT IN OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE VIA THE MCSD SEIZURE IN VIOLATION OF THE IVTH AND VITH AMENDMENT OF SAID SJCC EXONEDRATING APRIL 6TH, 2017 DUI CONVICTION PROBATION DOCUMENTS ON MAY 13TH, 2017 EXONERATING THE DEFENDANT OF ALL CHARGES.

 

 

 

BY SAID UNJUST COURT ORDER AND BY EXCESSIVE BAIL, DEFENDANT PRO SE, WAS FALSELY JAILED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE IN THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL UNTIL MAY 19TH FOR VIOLATING A SPECIOUS NON EXISTENT OXYMORONIC DEFERRED A PRIMA FACIE CONTRADICTORY ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER BY SAN JACINTO COUNTY JUDGE JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, BY ACTING AS MC JUDGE, AT LAW FIVE,  PAUL DAMICO UNTIL THE APPELLANT’S ARRAIGNMENT HEARING,  MAY 19TH, 2017.

 

 

 

LEGAL DEFENSE SJCC  DOCUMENTS WERE RETURNED IN RESPONSE TO TWO FILED GRIEVANCES JUST BEFORE FRIDAY MAY 19TH ARRAIGNMENT HEARING AT LAW 5,  ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO. THE RETURN OF SAID SJCC APRIL 6TH PROBATION DOCUMENT EXONERATING THE APPELLANT OF ALL CHARGES INTO THE HANDS OF THE JAILED APPELLANT AT MCJAIL BY MCSD DEPUTIES WAS TO NO AVAIL.  THE  APPELLANT WITH SAID EXONERATING SJCC APRIL 6TH, 2017 PROBATION DOCUMENTS IN HAND,  EXONERATING THE DEFENDANT PRO SE OF TWO  MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY AND THEREFORE INVALIDATING  CHARGES WAS DENIED AT SAID MC COURT ARRAIGNMENT AT LAW FIVE BY SAID DAMICO ACTING AS JUDGE TO PRESENT SAID JUDGE AT ANY TIME SAID DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE, MAKE AB INITO MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL SAID CHARGES AND ESTOPEL ET ALIA  PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION,   TO SPEAK  A WORD IN HIS DEFENSE AT ANY TIME, TO MAKE A PLEA,  ASK FOR A JURY TRIAL, ALL IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S  ITH AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

 

 

MOREOVER, IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, WITHOUT APPELLANT PRO SE’S KNOWLEDGE AND RATIFICATION , BEING  AGAINST DUE PROCESS, , ASS. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, M.C. MADE MOTION BEFORE  JUDGE DAMICO IN ARRAIGNMENT OF THE APPELLANT HEARING ON THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2017,  TO DISMISS  FOR JUSTICE NO. 17-322548 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, AND THE SAME HAVING BEEN CONSIDERED, IT IS, THEREFORE ORDERED ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT SAID ABOVE ENTITLED AND NUMBERED CAUSE BE AND THE SAME IS DISMISSED BY SAID JUDGE. (EXHIBIT )  A CYNICAL RUSE BY THE MC COURT IN  A CONFLICT OF JUDICIAL INTEREST  TO DENY THE APPELLANT HIS VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO PUBLICLY FACE ALL CHARGES AND ACCUSSERS IN A FAIR AND PUBLIC TRIAL, AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, I.E. SUPPRESSION OF EXONERATING EVIDENCE- SAID SJCC  APRIL 6TH PROBATION DOCUMENTS- AND FALSE JAILING BY MC COURT LAW 5, ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO WITH EXCESSIVE BAIL.

 

 

 RES IPSO, IGITUR  APPELLANT PRO SE IN SAID CASE NO. 17-322548 MAKES MOTION IN APPEAL VIA  WRIT OF MANDAMUS (TEXAS CODE) PRAYING JUDGE CATHY HAMILTON, MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF JUDGES, ET ALIUS. TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL CHARGES, CONVICTIONS, SENTENCES, PROBATION, AND EXPUNGE  CRIMINAL RECORD IN SAID CASE AND SAID TWO ESTOPPEL PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, I.E. FALSE JAILING VIA SUPPRESSED EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE DERIVING FROM THE FEBRUARY 23, 2017 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND FALSE CONVICTION SJCC ACTING AS PERSON SOL, JOHN LOVETT PRESIDING, IN GRAVITY ENHANCED IN   THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  OF SAID APPELLANT MALICIOUSLY PURSUANT OF UNLAWFUL IN ABSENTIA SENTENCING OF THE APPELLANT AND JAILING FOR 365 DAYS, TWICE THE LEGAL MAXIMUM IN THE SAN JACINTO COUNTY JAIL, BY UNLAWFUL COURT ORDER OF SJCJ JOHN LOVETT AND SJCC  ACCOMPLICES WITHOUT CONSTITUTION/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING, LOVETT COMMITTING ALL SAID FELONIES  AND MISDEMEANORS AS PERSONA SOL  IMPERSONATING UN LAWFULLY A SJCC JUDGE, ENHANCED AS A RELIGIOUS HATE CRIME VIOLATING SAID APPEALANT PRO SE’S IST, AMENDMENT RIGHT IN TANDEM WITH HIS IVTH, VTH, VI, VIII, XVIIITH, XXITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW MALICIOUSLY  MASQUERADING AS A SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGE IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE AB INITIO.

 

 

 

 FACTUAL BASIS FOR GROUNDS OF APPEAL VIA  WRIT OF MANDAMUS

 

 

BORN OF JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE IN ORDER TO ESCAPE PERSONAL LIABILITY SUIT FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT, IS RES IPSO, IGITUR APRIORI  GROUNDS FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF DAMICO ACTING FURTHER AS JUDGE IN SAID MAY 19TH HEARING , THE  MC ASS. DA’S RUSE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE,  UNSOLICITED OR RATIFIED  BY THE APPELLANT, ONLY 1) DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID ,  AND HIDING FROM PUBLIC HEARING 2) ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION, THERE BY UNLAWFULLY SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE BOTH NO 1 AND NO. 2 MUTUALLY EXONERATING THE APPELLANT BY SUPPRESSING AND HIDING  BY SAID RUSE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF  JUSTICE  THE AB INITIO,  MAY 13TH, 2017 ENHANCING CHARGE – VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION – THE MAY 19TH MOTION TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE  STATED SOLELY THE  MAY 13TH AB INITIO CHARGE OF DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID.

SAID LUDICROUS RUSE BY THE MC ASS. DA. BEGS THE QUESTION, WHY NOT FOR JUSTICE DISMISS BOTH AB INITIO MAY 13TH, CHARGES IN PUBLIC HEARING? SAID UNLAWFUL SUPPRESSION OF EXONERATING EVIDENCE OF  AB INITIO ENHANCING CHARGE- VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION- HIDDEN FROM EXPOSURE, THEREBY HIDING BOTH LOVETT’S AND DAMICO’S MUTUAL JUDICIAL MALFEASANCE AND DE FACTO COLLUSION THEREBY IN TANDEM  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT. SAID RUSE MAY 19TH MOTION AND COURT ORDER AT LAW FIVE  IS A DE FACTO AND  A PERDURING COVER UP RUSE, TO HIDE SAID MALFEASANCE AND COLLUSION BY SAID LUDICROUS UNLAWFUL MOTION AND COURT ORDER PER CAUSAM UNLAWFUL JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY AN ACTING JUDGE PAUL DAMICO AND MC COURT LAW FIVE, IN, FOR AND BY THE MC COURT AT LAW FIVE, AND THE MCJ AND SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT.

 

SAID RUSE, MOTION AND COURT ORDER, ON MAY 19TH, 2017 WITH NO  DEFENSE OF INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE, IN FACT NOW SUSTAINS  LOVETT’S SPURIOUS CONTRADICTORY DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER, THROUGH SAID RUSE MOTION AND ORDER, ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO, MC COUNTY AND MC COURT AT LAW FIVE, MCJ AND MC S.D. BY SAID RUSE MOTION AND ORDER OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, AS ALL SAID BY SAID MAY 19TH RUSE IN FLIGHT FROM PERSONAL LEGAL LIABILITY SUIT AS CONSEQUENCE VIA JUDICIAL MALFEASANCE IN THE APPELLANT’S FALSE ARREST AND JAILING BY SAID MC COUNTY AND COURT LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES TWICE, MARCH 13TH, AND MAY 13 IN COLLUSION  WITH  LOVETT’S MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT, ALL SAID ENFORICING LOVETT’S PERSONA SOL INVALID EXTRADITION WARRANT MARCH 13TH, 2016/DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT, AND TO HIDE MALFESANCE IN THE APPELLANTS CAUSE IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR THE APPELLANT, THE MAY 19TH,  SAIDCOVER UP RUSE OF SAID 2016 DUI CONVICTION  LICENSE SUSPENSION IN CONTRADICTION OF  SPURIOUS ENHANCING CHARGE OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDERED AFTER APRIL 6TH  DUI CONVICTION PROBATION BY LOVETT, PERSONA SOL.

 

ON MAY 19TH BY SAID RUSE, MCC, AT LAW FIVE JUSTICE FOR THE APPELLANT WAS NOT SERVED IN ANYWAY  IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE ALBEIT  A TEMPORARY RESPITE FROM BEING AGAIN BY STANDING WARRANT UNLAWFULLY JAILED FOR CONTINUED VIOLATION OF A POST APRIL 6TH , 2017 SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUCATION PROBATION ORDER BY JUDGE LOVETT, AND A DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID OUTSTANDING CASE WARRANT BY MACK. ALL SAID NOT PUBLICLY ADDRESSED IN COURT HEARING AND RECORD BY MAY 19TH RUSE. RES IPSO, IGITUR  SAID 19TH  MAY RUSE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE   AND SUBSEQUENT MOCK COURT ORDER DE FACTO OBSTRUCTED  JUSTICE THERE BY IN THE APPELLANT’S  CAUSE  AT ARRAIGNMENT HEARING MAY 19TH, 2017.  BY SAID UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND MALICIOUS SUPPRESSION FROM PUBLIC HEARING OF EXONERATING SJCC APRIL 6TH PROBATION DOCUMENT EVIDENCE IN TANDEM WITH THE RUSE OF THE HIDING OF A SPURIOUS POST APRIL 6TH , 2017 CONTRADICTORY , DEFFERED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER TO COVER LOVETT’S TRACKS FROM APRIL 6TH CONVICTION PROBATION ORDER,

 

IN VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, THEN WITHOUT THE APPELLANT’S SOLICITATION, FORE KNOWLEDGE AND  RATIFICATION OF SAID RUSE DELETION IN MOTION AND ORDER OF NO. 2 FROM PUBLIC HEARING AND RECORD ON MAY 19TH,. THE ASS. DA MADE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF  JUSTICE  SOLELY THE MAY 13TH  AB INITIO CHARGE DRIVING  WHILE LICENSE INVALID AND THEREBY AS HAS BEEN SHOWN. SAID MOTION RUSE DENIED APPELLANT DUE PROCESS. SAID MAY 19TH RUSE HAS AS A PRETEXT, THE MCSD AND MC COURT AT LAW FIVE ,  AS AFTER THE FACT ACCESSORY,  VIOLATED AT THE APPELLANT’S ARREST MARCH 13TH AND AGAIN MAY 13TH AB INITIO AT BOTH  P.C HEARINGS, THE APPELLANT’S  WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,  VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. AS SUCH,   SAID UNLAWFUL SUPPRESSION BY DELETION OF SAID AB INITIO ENHANCING CHARGE NO. 2  IN MAY 19TH RUSE, A RUSE PERPETRATED AGAINST THE APPELLANT  OUT OF AN UNLAWFUL JUDICIAL  CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY THE MC COURT TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE , DENIED  THE APPELLANT DUE PROCESS AND THEREBY OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND HARM INFLICTED ON THE APPELLANT TWICE BY SAID MC COURT, LAW FIVE AND SAID ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO,  ENFORCING WITHOUT DUE DILIGENCE OF FACT AND WHEN DISAVOWING  REASONABLE JURIS PRUDENCE PLACING THE APPELLANT IN CONTINUOUS DOUBLE JEOPARDY RE: SAID DELICT INVALID 2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT WARRANT , MARCH 13, 2017 AND BY MAY 19TH RUSE SUPPRESSION  OF EXONERATING EVIDENCE OF SPURIOUS DEFERRED PROBATION ADJUDICATION  ORDERED BY JOHN LOVETT, ISSUED WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING APRIL 6TH, 2017 AGAINST THE APPELLANT..

 

 

 

FACTUAL BASIS SAID 2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR EXTRADITION WARRANT AND DEFFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ARE INVALID DUE TO LACK OF CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING OF JOHN LOVETT AB INITIO.

 

 

 

SAID WARRANT FOR APPELLANT’S ARREST  AND EXTRADITION TO SJC JAIL WITH OUT BAIL,  WAS CITED BY THE ARRESTING  TDPS HP OFFICER , MARCH 13TH, 2017  WHEN ASKED FOR BY THE APPELLANT  AS  2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT- OR RATHER-“DID YOU MISS COURT”-  THE WARRANT DATE  2016 RE:  IST DUI +.15 CAM CAUSE NUMBER 2016-215- SJCC/FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT.  BY SAID WARRANT THE APPELLANT WAS AB INITO  ARRESTED AND JAILED IN THE M.C.J ON HOLY THURSDAY, MARCH 13, WITHOUT BAIL TO BE EXTRADITED TO SJC WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF BAIL, TO SERVE 365 DAYS, (TWICE THE LEGAL MAXIMUM OF 180 Days FOR FIRST DUI)  DERIVES FROM TEXAS STATE INDICTMENT, CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, CAUSE NO. 2016-215- SIGNED BY CHRISTINA T. WOOD. ASS. CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SJC, TEXAS  IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 “THAT ON AND BEFORE THE 24TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015, AND BEFORE AND MAKING AND FILING OF THIS INFORMATION, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN JACINTO AND THE STATE OF TEXAS, ONE CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL TERRY, (IN A YEAR OF SJCC PROCEEDINGS THE APPELLANT SEVEN TIMES TOLD THE COURT HIS MIDDLE NAME WAS DANIEL TO NO AVAIL) HERE IN STYLED DEFENDANT, WAS DUI +.15 BAC “WITH A BOX OF WINE” IN HIS IMMEDIATE POSSESSION”.  SAID ARRESTING  MARCH 13TH WARRANT VOLO CONTENDERE ORDERED WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING BY LOVETT PERSONA SOL  REFERENCES DUI 2016  IN CONTRADICTION TO BOTH SAID TEXAS CRIMINAL COMPLAINT UNDERSIGNED BY ASS. DA WOODS AND SAID SENTENCING ILLEGALLY IN ABSENTIA IN CAUSE NO 2016-215 BY LOVETT DERIVING FROM FEB. 23RD 2017 FALSE DUI CONVICTION OF APPELLANT UNLAWFULLY  IN ABSENCIA STATES ON APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER SAID 1ST DUI OFFENSE DATE TO BE ON  DECEMEMBER 24TH, 2015.IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 BY JOHN LOVETT.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR THE 2/23/17 APRIL 4TH 2016 DUI VOLO CONTENDERE FALSE CONVICTION IN VIOLATION UNDER COLOR OF LAW OF The APPELLANT’S IVTH, VITH, VITH, VIIITH, XVIIITH AND XXITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS IS NULL AND VOID, AS WELL AS THE APRIL 6TH ILLEGAL IN ABSENTIA SENTENCING BY ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, OF THE INNOCENT APPELLANTT TO 365 DAYS IN SJC JAIL, TWICE THE LEGAL MAXIMUM OF 180 DAYS 1ST DUI,  SAID SAME APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER  LISTS THE IST DUI OFFENSE DATE AS DECEMBER 24, 2015, NOT IN FACT APRIL 4, 2016, THE ACTUAL DATE OF THE ALLEGED DUI OFFENSE ON SAID INVALID 2016 EXTRADITION WARRANT BY WHICH THE APPELLANT WAS JAILED FALSELY TWICE IN MCJ. MOREOVER, SAID  ORIGINAL INSTANTER AND TDPS OFFENSE REPORT# TK4KYLOUTI5U BY BILLY CORLEY STATE THE DATE OF OFFENSE AS APRIL 4TH, 2016, NOT DEC. 24TH, 2015. (EXHIBIT 5).

 

MOREOVER, PERJURING HIMSELF IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001, AND IN FALSELY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT UNDER OATH AS STATE WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION IN SJCC ON 2/23/17 TDPSHPO BILLY CORLEY JUNIOR ON SAID DUI INSTANTER AND OFFENSE REPORT # TK4KYLOUTI5U RECORDED A CONTRIVED SPURIOUS DUI OFFENSE SITE OF ARREST AND SEARCH: MP 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY TO FEIGN CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND JURIDICAL STANDING FOR SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT, THE APPELLANT’S FALSE ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE ON ARIL 4TH, 2016 WAS IN LIBERTY COUNTY, NOT SAN JACINTO COUNTY.  CORLEY’S FEIGNING CRIMINAL DUI JURISDICTION FOR JOHN LOVETT AND SJCC  BY NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITE IN SAN JUCINTO COUNTY RUSE IS A TYPICAL AND COMMON DECEPTION ENSNARING TACTIC  IN SJC IN TANDEM  WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  IN ORDER FOR REVENUE STARVED COUNTIES LIKE SJC, ONE OF THE POOREST COUNTIES IN TEXAS. TO DEFRAUD  ANYONE IN TEXAS VIA DUI FINES, JAILING COSTS, COURT COSTS, BAC TEST COSTS, PROBATION COSTS, AND TDPS SURCHARGES FOR LOSS OF LICENSE FOR BAC REFUSAL AND DUI CONVICTION VIA A STATE WIDE GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION REVENUE FRAUD OVERSEEN BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS.

 

IN 2016, DURING DISCOVERY DUE DILIGENCE, THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE IN CAUSE NO”2016 -215- INTERVIEWED   A TEX.DOT EMPLOYEE, ADAM ADAMS, AT THE LIBERTY COUNTY SCENE OF APPELLANT’S FALSE ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE TRIGGERING BY SAID TDPSHPO INSTANTER # TK4KYLOUTI5U ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF THE APPELLANT’S  BLOOD WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE AND AGAINST THE APPELLANT’S WRITTEN REFUSAL(WHICH TRIGGERED  THE INITIAL UNLAWFUL SEIZING  OF APPELLANT’S CM AND CDL DRIVERS LICENSE  FOR 180 AND 365 DAYS RESPECTIVELY- THIS ILLEGAL CONFISCATION OF SAID LICENSES WAS CONTESTED AS AN ESTOPPEL OF CAUSE NO 2016-215 SJCC AT TRIAL IN THE COURT OF JUDGE MACK ON MAY 13TH, 2017.  MACK DISMISSED OUT OF HAND WITHOUT DUE DILIGENCE APPELLANT’S AB INITIO MOTION  BE FORE TRIAL TO DISMISS THE CHARGE-DRIVING WITHOUT A VALID LICENSE (SUSPENDED) PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DENYING WITH OUT DUE DILIGENCE AND DISMISSING OUT OF HAND  SAID SJCC CAUSE HEARING STANDING AS AN ESTOPPEL.  MOREOVER APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO A FAIR TRIAL BY THE MC ASS. DA’S AT PC JUDGE MACK, JUSTICE ONE COURT REFUSAL TO  BY LAW PRESENT FOURTEEN DAYS BEFORE THE  MARCH 13TH DEFENSE TRIAL TO THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE THE LIST OF THE STATE CASE’S WITNESSES FOR THE PROSECUTION-VIOLATING THE DEFENDANT’S DISCOVERY RIGHTS TO VET THE STATE’S PROSECUTION WITNESSES AGAINST THE APPELLANT

 

IN SPITE OF SAID MOCK MAY 19TH ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE  SOLELY DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID DERIVING FROM SJCC 2016 -215- AND REFERENCING SAID MC COURT, JUSTICE ONE, PC MACK MARCH 13TH VOLO CONTENDERE FALSE CONVICTION FOR DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID, THE APPELLANT AFTER MAY 19TH RECEIVED NOTICE OF CASE OUTSTANDING WARRANT FOR HIS ARREST FROM SAID WAYNE MACK, PERSONA SOL, LIKE LOVETT IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.

 

TO CONTINUE

 

IN DISCOVERY, THE APPELLANT DROVE TO THE SITE OF HIS FALSE ARREST ON APRIL 4TH, 2016  ON THE N I-59  JUST SOUTH OF CLEVELAND TEXAS IN LIBERTY COUNTY, NOT SAN JACINTO COUNTY. THE APPELLANT NAIVELY SEARCHED FOR MP 450 I 59, SAN JACINTO COUNTY AT THIS SITE.. IN A CHANCE ENCOUNTER, WITH ADAM ADAMS A TEX.DOT CONTRACT EMPLOYEE WORKING THERE TO TRANSITION THE I-59 TO I-69, TOLD THE APPELLANT THAT “INTRASTATES” LIKE I-59 DO NOT HAVE MILE POST MARKERS, ONLY “INTERSTATES” LIKE I-69 . IF THE I-59 DID HAVE MILE POST MARKERS, ADAMS CONTINUED, THE I-59 DOES NOT AS SUCH, MPM 450 I 59, STARTING AT LAREDO, THE MEXICAN BORDER, WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 90 MILES NORTH OF SAN JACINTO COUNTY.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, NO CONSTITUTIONAL/ STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING DERIVES FROM SAID  NON EXISTENT SPURIOUS FRAUDULENT DUI OFFENSE SITE MP 450 I-59  IN SJC IN CAUSE 2016-215- FOR JOHN LOVETT AS SJC JUDGE AB INITIO, OR IN AN ESTOPPEL CASE  AB INITIO FOR THE SAME REASON,  NO JUDICIAL STANDING IS ADMITTED FOR JUDGE MACK IN AN ESTOPPEL CASE DRIVING WITH AN INVALID LICENSE CHARGE DERIVED FROM THE UNLAWFUL CONFISCATION OF APPELLANTS DRIVER’S LICENSE  TRIGGERED BY BAC  DIC 24 REFUSAL APRIL 4TH, 2016.VIA THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL 2003 TDPS GOOD DRIVING PROGRAM.

 

 

SAID BAC BLOOD SAMPLE REFUSAL BY THE APPELLANY IS LAWFUL ACCORDING TO BAC TEXAS LAW AND THE US CONSTITUTIONAL. SAID BAC REFUSAL IS LAWFUL UNDER TEXAS LAW IF THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE OF ALCOHOL IMPAIRMENT ABOVE .08  IN APPELLANT’S CAUSE 2016-215- SJCC-  TDPSHPO  INSTANTER # TK4KYLOUTI5U TDPS DUI OFFENSE REPORT  BY BILLY CORLEY DOES NOT NOTE ANY SPECIFIC INDICATIVE BEHAVIORS OF A BAC .231- ALMOST THREE TIME THE LEGAL LIMIT- ATTRIBUTED BY TDPS OFFICER BILLY CORLEY JR., AND SWORN TO IN SJCC BY CORLEY TO CONVICT FALSELY THE APPELLANT OF DUI ENHANCED +.15 TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR .RES IPSO IGITUR, CORLEY  SWEARS  NO PROBABLE CAUSE OF BAC .231 IN TDPSHPO  DUI OFFENSE REPORT ATTRIBUTED TO THE APPELLANT ON APRIL 4TH, 2015, THEREFORE THE APPELLANT’S REFUSAL WAS LAWFUL ACCORDING TO TEXAS BAC REFUSAL LAW AND THE TDPS LICENSE SUSPENSION FOR SAID REFUSAL WAS  UNLAWFUL.

 

 

MOREOVER, NO CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING EITHER FOR LOVETT, OR JUDGE MACK, IS DERIVED FROM ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SPECIOUS OFFENSE DATE, CHRISTMASS EVE, DEC. 24TH, 2015. STATED AB INITIO ON SAID CRIMINAL INDICTMENT SIGN BY ASS DA CHRISTINA WOODS AND  ON LOVETT’S APRIL 6TH, 2017 SENTENCING AND PROBATION ORDER IN CONTRADICTION TO BILLY CORLEY’S INSTANTER AND DUI OFFENSE REPORT# TK4KYLOUTI5U THAT STATES APRIL 4TH, 2016 TO BE IN FACT THE TRUE DATE OF CONTRIVED DUI OFFENSE

 

 

 

MOREOVER NO EVIDENCE FROM A NONE EXISTENT SPECIOUS OFFENSE SITE ON A FALLACIOUS DATE – SUCH AS TDPSFC LAB REPORT BY TDPS FCL TECHNICIAN RACHEL AUBEL OF  BAC .231 ENHANCING 1ST DUI TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION COURT JUDGEMENT IS ADMISSIBLE IN A US COURT OF LAW. MOREOVER, SAID TDPSCF LAB MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE OF BAC .231 WAS NOT RETESTED BY APPELLANT’S REQUEST OF A SJCC ORDER DENIED BY JOHN LOVETT IN DISCOVERY COURT January 9th, 2017,  IN VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW   AND WAS THEN SWORN TO BY AUBEL IN SJCC IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION TO FALSELY  CONVICT THE APPELLANT IN ABSENTIA OF 1ST DUI  ON DECEMBER 24TH, 2015.+15 ENHANCED TO CAM ON 2/23/17 IN SJCC IN THE COMMISSION OF AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME AGAINST THE APPELLANT. AUBEL’S .231 BAC REPORT’S DATE, ISSUED APRIL 29TH, 2016 CONTRADICTS ANTI CATHOLIC SLUR DATE ON SAID CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER BY SJCC OF CHRISTMAS EVE, DECEMBER 24TH, 2015. .

 

 

 

FIRST ARRESTED BY THE TEXAS DPS HIGHWAY PATROL IN THE COURT OF JUDGE WAYNE MACK, AND JAILED IN  M.C.J. ON MARCH 13TH UNLAWFULLY ENFORCING  SAID DELICT DUI 2016 WARRANT BY ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, ON  MARCH 18TH THE APPELLANT WAS TRANSPORTED FROM MCJ TO SJC JAIL.  MANACLED AND THEN AT MC J PROCESSED.  APPELLANT AT ARRIVAL IN SJC JAIL WAS TOLD BY AN OFFICER OF THE SJC COURT SPECIFICALLY COMMISSIONED  BY LOVETT, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL TERRY IS  SENTENCED  TO 365 DAYS IN SJCJ (LOVETT PERSONA SOL IN VIOLATION OF TEXAS CODE SENTENCING LAW  SENTENCED IN ABSENTIA APPELLANT TO TWICE THE LEGAL MAXIMUM OF 180 DAYS FOR 1ST DUI) AND THAT APPELLANT IS TO SERVE 365 DAYS BEFORE RELEASE WITHOUT PROBATION.. THIS IS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT AS PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE IN THE JAILING OF AN INNOCENT MAN  VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION PURSUANT OF AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME BY JOHN LOVETT, A MEMBER OF A SUBVERSIVE  ANTI CATHOLIC SECRET SOCIETY, THE FREE MASONS, SWORN IN THEIR CONSTITUTIONS TO SEEK THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH AND CATHOLICS.  FREE MASONS IN SAN JACINTO AND LIBERTY COUNTY HAVE A HISTORICAL MEMBERSHIP AFFILIATION WITH FELLOW OUTLAWED MASONIC BROTHERHOOD OF THE  KLU KLUX KLAN, LIKEWISE DEDICATED TO THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH AND TERRORIZING OF CATHOLICS, MOST FERVENTLY  DURING  PROHIBITION.

 

 

SAID RUSE MAY 19TH MOTION AND COURT ORDER ONLY TO DISMISS  FOR JUSTICE DRIVING WITH AN INVALID LICENSE AND UNLAWFULLY DELETED AND THEREBY SUPPRESSED FROM THE COURT HEARING AND THEREBY  COURT RECORD THE AB INITIO ENHANCING CHARGE OF VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION DOES IN FACT ALLOW IN EFFECT JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, AND  ACCOMPLICES WITH IMPUNITY TO VIOLATE AND TO CONTINUE TO VIOLATE IN ALL SAID CRIMINAL MANNER APPELLANT’S ALL SAID CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING AB INITIO PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECTUTION PURSUANT OF AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR  LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES, BY SAID MAY 19  MOCK ORDER OF DISMISSAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, ARE NOT ABROGATED  BY SAID MOCK ORDER  IN CONTINUOUS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSION’S  DUI/POM FRAUD PURSUANT OF SAID ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.  NOR  THEREBY, BY SAID RUSE MAY 19TH IS LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES HELD PUBLICALLY AND LEGALLY  ACCOUNTABLE AND INDICTABLE, NOR EVER ARRESTED FOR ALL SAID FEDERAL AND STATE FELONIES AND  MISDEMEANORS  BY SAID LAW FIVE MOCK COURT ORDER MAY 19TH, 2017.

 

RES IPSO IGITUR, THE MAY 19TH SAID RUSE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE PROVIDES THE APPELLANT  NO TANGIBLE RELIEF  AND IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE MAROONS THE APPELLANT LEGALLY  CONTINUOUSLY STILL TO BE  VICTIMIZED BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION- FALSE JAILING VIA MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE- AND NONETHELESS BY MOCK MAY 19TH  COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE  BY  MC COURT LAW FIVE AND ACTING AS JUDGE DAMICO THE APPELLANT BE DENIED  ALL JUSTICE AND ALL CIVIL RIGHT  OF A CONSTITUTIONAL HEARING TO FACE  ACCUSERS, LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES,,  HEAR PUBLICLY ALL CHARGES, AND SEE AND PRESENT ALL EVIDENCE IN A PUBLIC HEARING,  BY SAME MAY 19TH MOCK ORDER, IN AN UNLAWFUL JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST, DENIED EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR CONTINUOUS  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY  SAME SAID MC COURT AND SAID MCSD AND MCJ AUTHORITIES.

 

MOREOVER, THE APPELLANT AS STANDING WARRANTS ISSUED AFTER THE MAY 19TH MOCK COURT ORDER SHOW (EXHIBIT) IS NEVERTHELESS SUBJECTED, IN SPITE OF SAID MAY 19TH MOCK CYNICAL RUSE COURT ORDER, CONTINUOUSLY TO INJURY AND TO THREAT OF  IMPRISONMENT BY LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES  VIA A MUTUAL SPURIOUS PROBATION ORDER COVER UP BY SAID MAY 19TH RUSE  GIVING NO EQUITABLE REDRESS  OR RELIEF THERE FROM TO THE APPELLANT BY SAID MAY 19TH  RUSE ORDER..

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, SAID MAY 19TH  MOCK COURT ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF  JUSTICE  IS A CYNICAL RUSE BY SAID MC COURT AT LAW 5, BORN OF UNLAWFUL JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A COURT OF LAW, SAID CONFLICT, FORTHWITH  ENGENDERING MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF THE APPELLANT BY SAID MC COURT  AND BY MAY 19TH RUSE IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE DOES  DENY APPELLANT EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR TIME OF FALSE IMPRISONMENT, AND DAMAGES DUE TO MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BOTH BY SAID MC COURT AND MCSD AUTHORITIES, AND JOHN LOVETT AND SJCC AND SJCSD ACCOMPLICES.

 

WARRANTS ISSUED FOR THE APPELLANT’S ARREST BY LOVETT AND MACK, TDPS  SHOW SAID MAY 19TH RUSE MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND MOCK COURT ORDER IS NOT RECORDED IN THE COURT RECORD ON THE 19TH OF MAY AND/OR NOT  PUBLICLY PROMULGATED BY THE COURT AND RES IPSO, IGITUR (EXHIBIT) APPELLANT IS WITH NO JUST RELIEF FROM SAID MOCK ORDER TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND  RES IPSO IGITUR IN CONTINUOUS JEOPARDY OF FALSE ARREST AND FALSE JAILING AND FINES BY WARRANT OF JOHN LOVETT AND WAYNE MACK AND TDPS  IN VIOLATION OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION.

 

 FAILURE BY THE COURT IN SUMMARY JUDGEMENT TO GRANT APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT  TO DISMISS  WITHOUT PREJUDICE CHARGES ET AL. PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, JUST AS  GREGG ABBOTT BEING REMISS IN HIS SWORN DUTY TO UPHOLD THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION AS GOVERNOR  (EXHIBIT) AND TO CERTIFY APPELLANT’S RES IPSO FACTO DISQUALIFICATION MOTION OF LOVETT 2/23/17 AS JUDGE IN CAUSE 2016-215- ENABLES JOHN LOVETT AND HIS CO-CONSPIRATORS AND ACCOMPLICES TO CONTINUOUS PERPETRATE  TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM CAH COW MONEY MAKING FRAUD AND UNDER OF COLOR OF LAW  TO UNABATED HAVE THEIR PART IN DEFRAUDING OVER TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND INNOCENT PERSONS IN TEXAS A YEAR, IN TANDEM WITH UNLAWFULLY CONFISCATING  NON CDL DRIVER’S LICENCES VIA THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL  2003 TDPS (DPR) DRIVER’S RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM BY LAW IS LIMITED TO CONFISCATING ONLY COMMERICIAL A/ CDL, NOT CLASS C/B/M DRIVER’S LICENSE.  AND YET ALMOST 96% OF LICENSES CONFISCATED AND SUSPENDED BY TDPS IN SAID GOVERNMENT/POLICE REVENUE FRAUDS IN VIOLATION OF THE TEXAS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ARE OTHER THAN PROFESSIONAL COMMERCIAL A/CDL LICENSES, SUSPENDED IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD OUTSIDE THE LAW OF THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL 2003 TDPS DRIVERS’ RESPONSIBILITY LAW RURAL AND COMMERICAL LEGAL ENFORCEMENT PERAMETERS.  PURSUANT OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY SURCHARGES EXTORTED FOR THE TEXAS STATE GOVERNMET VIA TDPS UNDER THREAT OF JAILING ( A VERITABLE DEBTORS PRISON) TO GET THE AB INITIO UNLAWFUL CONFISCATED SUSPENDED LICENSES BACK AFTER ILLEGAL SUSPENSION AB INITIO.  

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR,

 

THE APPELLANT MAKES SAID APPEAL PETITIONING  WRIT OF MANDAMUS REPRESENTING IN CLASS ACTION SUIT EVERYONE FREELY ENJOINING SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT IN TEXAS VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. FALSE JAILING AND MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED POTENTIALLY OXONERATING  BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE THERE BY  FALSELY CONVICTED OF DUI/POM  IN PERPETRATION OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

SAID APPEAL AND SAID WRIT IS A CLASS ACTION SUIT EX PARTE  EVERYONE  IN TEXAS VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION FALSELY CONVICTED OF DUI/POM  WITH MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EXONERATING BLOOD SAM0PLE  EVIDENCE, ET ALIA AND FALSELY JAILED AND PENALIZED IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE FIVE GOVERNOR APPOINTED TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF  PUBLIC SAFETY  COMMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

SAID MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED POTENTIALLY EXONERATING  PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE  IN THE APPELLANT’S APPEAL CONSTITUTE  PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID  CLASS ACTION SUIT  AS CLASS ACTION  PLAINTIFF AGAINST THE FIVE COMMISSIONERS OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY  AND EMPLOYEES AND ACCOMPLICES FOR PERPETRATION OF SAID DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD AGAINST PLAINTIFFS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.  .

 

SAID MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD CONSTITUTING PLAINTIFF STANDING IN CLASS ACTION SUIT ARE:

 

ALL TDPS FORENSIC CRIME LAB, HARRIS COUNTY AUTHORED BAC TEST REPORTS USED IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF VICITIMS OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IN TEXAS CONSTITUTE PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT. EVERY SAID TDPSFC LAB BAC TEST REPORT IS SCIENTIFICALLY SPURIOUS AND MALICIOUSLY MISLEADING AS FALLACIOUSLY SELF CERTIFIED BY TDPSFC LAB BAC TECHNICIAN OF SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORTS SAID  TO BE  “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL.”

 

THE TRUTH IS NO TDPSFC LAB BAC TECHNICIAN UNDERSIGNING AND THEREBY SWEARING  TO ANY TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORT AS LEGAL EVIDENCE FOR STATE DUI PROSECUTION CAN HAVE ANY VALID SELF CERTIFIED  RATHER THAN SCIENTIFICALLY BASED  BAC TEST RESULT CONFIDENCE LEVEL OF BAC TEST ACCURACY AT ANY LEVEL, MOREOVER “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” OF SAID BAC TEST RESULTS ACCURACY.  TDPSCF LAB SELF CERTIFIED AT  “%99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” BAC REPORTS  BY THE UNDERSIGNING AND THEREBY SWEARING AS LEGAL EVIDENCE TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST TECHNISIAN IS AN INTENTIONALLY DECEPTIVE WAY OF STATING  EVERY SAID TDPSCFL BAC TEST REPORT RESULT IS WHAT THE TDPSFC LAB REPORT SAY IT IS BECAUSE THE UNDERSIGNING BAC TECHNICIAN SAYS SO WITH A “99,7% CONFIDENCE LEVEL”. BASICALLY, THE BAC TEST RESULT LEVEL IS WHAT THE TDPSCF LAB REPORT SWEARS THE BAC IS,  BECAUSE THE UNDERSIGNER ALLEGED TDPSCF LAB BAC TECHNICIAN  THEREBY SWEARS IT. IS WITH A “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL”. AND THERE IS NO RETESTING OF TDPSFC LAB BAC REPORTS BY INDEPENDENT LAB IN VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW. THE BAC LEVEL IS WHAT IT IS BECAUSE I SWEAR IT IS IN MY REPORT TO BE LEGAL EVIDENCE FOR A COURT OF LAW WITH “99.7 %” CONFIDENCE  LEVEL.  THIS IS NOT A SCIENCE BASED BAC REPORT RESULT, THIS IS A FRAUD BASED REPORT SINE QUA NON IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD..  MOREOVER TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT UNDERSIGNERS HAVE  A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN SWEARING THE BAC TEST RESULTS AT A SPURIOUS %99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVELARE NEVER BELOW .O8 OR EVEN .15 BAC TO QUALIFY AS MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE FOR DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS. THE APPELLANT’S CASE RAISES A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT THE TDPS EVEN PREFORMS THE BAC TEST ON MAILED IN PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES IN THE FIRST PLACE.

 

SAID TDPSCF LAB REPORTS BAC LEVELS ARE WHAT THEY ARE SWORN TO BE WITH 99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL THEREFORE,  NOT BASED ON TDPSCF LAB FOLLOWING EXACTING BAC OPTIMAL TESTING PROCEDURES WITH WELL MAINTAINED TESTING DEVICES AT SPECIFIED CALIBRATION LEVELS THAT ACHIEVED A 99% ACCURRACY IN BAC TEST RESULT WITH A 100%  CONFIDENCE LEVEL IN THAT RESULT THROUGH RIGOROUS COMPARISON WITH OTHER BAC TESTING CONSTELLATIONS IN SAID SCIENTIFIC STUDY AND REPORT WHICH COULD ONLY ACHIEVE WITH OPTIMAL TESTING ELEMENTS AND CONDITIONS A 99% LEVEL OF ACCURACY BY RIGOROUS EXPERIMENTATION.

 

Chromatographic resolution and peak shape are vital in determining peak area for quantification of blood

alcohol determination. With minor alterations of few headspace parameters, the accuracy and precision

of the alcohol concentration can be drastically altered. Determining the optimal parameters are of utmost

importance to achieve the most robust and precise analysis. Therefore, it is recommended from these

data that the headspace oven temperature for this instrumentation be set to 85 °C, with a headspace vial

pressurization of 15 psi, for the best overall performance.

 

 

IN DISCOVERY IN 2016, JUST MONTHS AFTER SAID SCIENTIFC REPORT CLAIMED A 99% BAC ACCURACY LEVEL AT A %100 CONFIDENCE LEVEL UNDER OPTIMAL PROVEN TESTING CONDITIONS  WAS PUBLISHED ON  HOW LABS MAY ACHIEVE OPTIMAL BAC TEST ACCURANCY, THE TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY DID NOT RESPOND IN DISCOVERY TO THE APPELLANT’S REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION ABOUT THE NUMBER OF BAC. 231 TDPS RESULTS IN TEXAS, PARTICULARLY SJC OVER THE PAST FOUR MONTHS, NOR STANDARD TDPSCF LAB OPERATIONAL BAC TESTING PROCEDURE IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S DISCOVERY RIGHTS. TO SAY THE  TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORT RESULTS ARE SELF CERTIFED BY THE REPORT UNDERSIGNING  SWEARING THEM AS COURT EVIDENCE WITH 99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL IS A SCIENTIFICALLY MEANINGLESS DISTORTION.  IF THE ABOVE BAC TESTING PROTOCAL IS NOT FOLLOWED IN EVERY  BAC  TDPSFC LAB TESTING CASE, WHICH  WITHOUT A DOUBT IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE  SAID BAC TESTING PROTOCAL WAS NOT, With minor alterations of few headspace parameters, the accuracy and precision

of the alcohol concentration can be drastically altered .

 

 

TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY ALLEGEDLY A MONTH BACK LOGGED IS COMPLETELY ABSORBED DOING HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF  BAC TEST REPORTS FOR ALL OF TEXAS ( THERE IS A REASONABLE DOUBT RAISED BY THE APPELLANT’S CASE THAT THE TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST ON  PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES ARE ACTUALLY DONE IN EVERY DUI CASE IN TEXAS) THE AMOUNT OF BAC TESTING, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES A YEAR AT JUST ONE LAB, HARRIS COUNTY CAUSES SYSTEMIC ACCURACY DYSFUNCTION, THE LENGTHY PERIOD OF TIME BEFORE TESTING AND FILING ERRORS, (ALCOHOL FORMENTS IN BLOOD IF NOT FROZEN OR REFRIGERATED. IN DISCOVERY THE TDPSCF LAB DID NOT RESPOND TO ANY TDPSCF LAB PROCEDURE QUESTIONS. THE BLOOD SAMPLES ARE NOT IMMEDIATELY REFRIGERATED WHEN PUT INTO A MAIL BOX BY THE DUI INSTANTER ISSUING ARRESTING OFFICER AFTER THEIR PIRATING AND CAB BE SUBJECTED DURING SUMMER AND AUTUMN MONTHS IN TEXAS TO HIGH TEMPERATURES INCREASING FERMENTATION.  PLUS OR MINUS .O2 BAC DIFFERENTIAL IS  ALLOWABLE IN COURT). MOREOVER, THAT AMOUNT OF RELENTLESS TESTING REQUIRES CONSTANT DOWN TIME TO REPAIR AND MAINTAIN AND CALIBERATE THE TDPSCF LAB BAC TESTING MACHINCES TO MAINTAIN THE 99% BAC TEST RESULT ACCURACY LEVEL AT 100% CONFIDENCE IN EVERY DUI CASE IN TEXAS.

ALTHOUGH THE APPELLANT WAS DENIED IN DISCOVERY BY TDPSCF LAB ANY TDPSCF LAB BAC TESTING PROTOCOL AT THE HARRIS COUNTY LAB, THERE IS A REASONABLE DOUBT THEREBY THAT TDPSCF LAB FOLLOWED IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, OR IN ANY DUI CAASE IN  TEXAS SAID OPTIMAL BAC TESTING PROCEDURE- Determining the optimal parameters are of utmost

importance to achieve the most robust and precise analysis. Therefore, it is recommended from these

data that the headspace oven temperature for this instrumentation be set to 85 °C, with a headspace vial

pressurization of 15 psi, for the best overall performance.  THIS NOT BEING DONE IN EVERY CASE AT THE HARIS COUNTY LAB ENTAILS With minor alterations of few headspace parameters, the accuracy and precision

of the alcohol concentration can be drastically altered .  THE SPURIOUS SELF CERTIFYING AT “99.7% CONFIDENCE LEVEL”  TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST RESULTS REPORT NOT WITHSTANDING IN ANY SCIENTIFIC OR LEGALLY MEANINGFUL WAY.

 

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MOREOVER, IN THE EXEMPLAR APPELLANT’S CASE, THE  MALICIOUSLY LUDICROUS AND ARBITRARY ATTRIBUTED WITH % 99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL BY TDPSFC LAB BAC TECHNICIAN RACHEL AUBEL TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLENT OF ENHANCED BY +.15 CAM DUI, SAID TDPSFC LAB

.231 BAC TDPSCF LAB REPORT-  WITH RESULTS AT %99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL, I.E. ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT OF .08, THE HIGHEST BAC DEGREE LISTED ON THE STANDARD BAC CHART – YET  RACHEL AUBEL’S SAID TDPSFC LAB BAC .231REPORT WITH %99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL ASSIGNED TO THE APPELLANT IN A TDPSFC BAC LAB REPORT ISSUED BY RACHEL AUBEL ON APRIL29TH, 2016 IN LINKING THE APPELLANT TO A DUI OFFENSE ON CHRISTMAS EVE, DECEMBER 24, 2015 UNDERSIGNED BY ASS DA. CHRISTINA WOOD IN HER CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST THE APPELLANT FOR SAID DUI, AND AGAIN ON JOHN LOVETT’S APRIL 6TH, 2017 PROBATION ORDER, SAID BAC .231 LEVEL, ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT, WAS NOT CORROBORATED BY BILLY CORLEY’S TDPSHPO DUI OFFENSE REPORT, APRIL 4, 2016 TO ANY SIGNIFICANT DEGREE. CORLEY SWORE TO THE .231 BAC AND DECEMBER 24, 2015 DATE AS STATE WITNESS TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT IN TANDEM WITH RACHEL ABEL IN CONTRACTION OF HIS APRIL 4, 2016 DUI TDPSHP OFFENSE REPORT,  THIS AND  SAID ABRITRARY ASSIGNED BAC .231 TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT UNDERSIGNED BY RACHEL AUBEL APRIL 29TH, 2016, AND SWORN TO UNDER OATH AGAIN BY AUBEL AND CORLEY TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT 2/23/17 OF AN ENHANCED THERE BY CLASS A MISDEMEANOR 1ST DUI OFFENSE, BEGS QUESTIONS AND  RAISES MANY REASONABLE DOUBTS ABOUT ALL TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICITMS PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES FROM TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS BEING FIRST AND FOREMEOST SUPPRESSED AS POTENTIALLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE OF DUI FOR ALMOST A MONTH IN ALL CASES BY TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY,  ARE DURING SAID TIME PERIOD EVER ACTUALLY TESTED IN THE FIRST PLACE AT TDPSFC LAB, HARRIS COUNTY, JUST AS NON LUCRATIVE UNTESTED RAPE KITS BACKED LOGGED SIX YEARS AT THE TDPSCF LAB HARRIS COUNTY ARE NOT TESTED DUE TO BACK LOG, AN OXYMORON. RAPE KITS ARE NOT TESTED BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT TESTED THEM ALL FOR SIX YEARS NOW.

 

 

 

 

DE FACTO,  IN TEXAS, NOT ONE TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT RESULTS ALLEGEDLY BASED ON SAID PIRATED TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICITMS’ BLOOD SAMPLES HAS EVER BEEN RETESTED FOR SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY  AGAIN BY TDPSFC LAB FOR REASONABLE DOUBT OF SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY IN THE INTEREST OF JUST AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE – OR  DE FACTO -EVEN IF RETESTED- SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT TEST RESULTS NEVER ARE I REMIND YOU- THE TDPSCF LAB BAC RETEST RESULTS FOR ALL SAID INEXORABLE MATRIX EFFECT BAC TESTING DEVICE MAINTENANCE AND CALIBRATION INEXORABLE SYSTEMIC DYSFUNCTION ARE NOT AND CANNOT BE WITH 99.7 %  CONFIDENCE LEVEL OF ACCURACY BE SCIENTIFICALLY RETESTED- RES IPSO, IGITUR IN VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW IN ALL DUI CASES IN TEXAS, THIS HAS BEEN PROVEN,

 

 

MOREOVER, NOT ONE SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORT HAS EVER RETURNED AFTER DUI INSTANTER JAILING IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FROM SAID TDPSCF LAB AT -_.08. TRIGGERING THEREBY A MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SUIT AGAINST THE TDPS AND AFTER THE FACT ACCESSORIES.

 

THE APPELLANT KNOWS OF ONLY A ONE, SINGLE PENDING EXCEPTION OF A -.08 AND MOST LIKELY BAC 00.00 BLOOD SAMPLE  TDPSCF LAB TEST REPORT RETURNED AFTER A SUSPECTED DUI CAR CRASH.  JOHN LOVETT’S VOLUNTARY BAC TEST BLOOD SAMPLES ARE THAT ONE, SINGLE PENDING EXCEPTION TO AN UNBREAKABLE TDPSFC LAB RULE,  IN AN “UNUSUAL PROCEDURE” IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION, LOVETT NOT CHARGED WITH DUI INSTANTER BY HIS SJCC CRONY TDPSHPO  IN THE TDPSCD/P REFVENUE FRAUD, AFTER BY WITNESSES OBSERVED DUI  IN A POTENTIALLY FATAL VEHICLE CRASH INVOLVING A FIFETEEN YEAR OLD GIRL ON MAY 1ST, 2017, LOVETT WITHOUT CAR INSURANCE.  BAC OO.OO BLOOD SAMPLE EXONERATING EVIDENCE IN LOVETT’S EXCEPTIONAL UNUSUAL PROCEDURE IS STILL PENDING SINCE IT HAS BEEN OVER THREE MONTHS, USUALLY IT TAKES THE TDPSFC LAB A MONTH TO ISSUE A BAC REPORT, AND AS PROMISED PUBLICLY LOVETT, NOR THE TDPS HAS MADE THE RESULTS OF LOVETT’S “VOLUNTARY “ NON DUI INSTANTER ISSUED TDPSCF LAB REPORT RESULTS KNOWN.  RES IPSO IGITUR, ALL EVIDENCE, WITH THE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION OF  LOVETT’S STILL PUBLICLY PENDING VOLUNTARY BAC BLOOD SAMPLE TDPSCF LAB REPORT RESULTS, IS 70% OF SAID BAC TDPSCF LAB REPORTS AFTER A MONTH RETURN AT + .2 BAC,  THE REMAINING 30% ABOVE .O8, AND MOST PROBABLY .15 BAC TO MAXIMIZE REVENUE IN THE TDPSCD/P FRAUD BY CLASS A MISDEMEANOR ENHANCEMENT THEREBY. ALL SAID BEGS THE QUESTION, CORROBORATED IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE MALICIOUSLY AND ARBITRARY TDPSCF LAB REPORT ASSIGNED  .231 BAC IN SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT FOR REVENGE DARING TO VOICE CONSTITUIONAL OBJECTIONS TO THE PIRATING OF HIS BLOOD BY CHI ST. LUKE EMPLOYEE THUGS OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, ALL IN ANY CASE BAC DEGRESS ABITRARY ASSIGNED REGARDLESS OF ACTUAL BAC TESTING  BY TDPSFC LAB IN REPORT TO MALICIOUSLY AND FALSELY CONVICT AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, OR TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AS IN JOHN LOVETT’S UNUSUAL PROCEDURE.

 

ALL SAID BEGS FURTHER QUESTIONS.  IS THE TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORT IN THE SPECIOUS GUISE OF TDPSCF LAB BACK LOG FAÇADE, EMPLOYED NOT ONLY TO SUPPRESS PIRATED POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC BLOOD SAMPLES IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS THEREBY, MOREOVER, SAID TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST FOR BAC TEST REPROT  IS NEVER EVER ACTUALLY DONE ON SAME “PROP” BLOOD SAMPLES ( THE BLOOD SAMPLE ITSELF IS NEVER ACTUALLY ITSELF TESTED BY TDPSFC LAB) IN ANY GIVEN CASE LIKE THE APPELLANT’S CASE.  ALL SAID BEGS THE QUESTION ARE ALL VICTIMS” PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES EMPLOYED IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ONLY AS A SPECIOUS TDPSCF LAB PROP AND NOT DE FACTO  BAC TESTED AS TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT ISSUER SWEARS. THIS TO MANUFACTURE ENHANCED CLASS A MISDEMEANOR INCRIMINATING BAC +.15  TDPSCL FRAUDULENT BAC TDPSCF LAB REPORTS A SINE QUA NON IN THE COMMISSION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. THE APPELLANT’S CASE RAISES A REASONABLE DOUBT OF FOUL PLAY THAT INDEED THIS IS THE TDPSCF LAB FRAUDULENT STANDARD PRACTICE IN BAC TEST REPORTS SINE QUA NON IN COMMISSION OF THE TDPSD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

ALL AND EVERY SAME TDPSFC LAB BAC TEST DUI, OR POM SUBSTANCE VERIFICATION TEST ET ALIUS IS NOT SUBJECT TO RETESTING IN SAID TDPSFC LAB AND BY REPORT’S TDPSCF LAB  UNDER SIGNER  FOR BAC BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE  ET ALIUS VALIDITY PURSUANT “OF JUSTICE AND NOT CONVICTION” SAID TDPSCF LAB REPORT RETEST PRESCINDED BY  THE FIVE COMMISSIONER TDPSCF LAB  DE FACTO NO RETESTING  OF BAC TEST REPORT RESULTS ET ALIUS  IN VIOLATION OF 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW,  VIA TDPSCF LAB WRITTEN AND OR UNSPOKEN  DE FACTO  POLICY PRECLUDING BAC/POM ET ALIUS RETESTING FOR REASONABLE PROBABLE CAUSE ON REQUEST OF DUI/POM  DEFENDANT.

 

ALL IN TEXAS CONVICTED BY TDPSCF LAB  BAC EVIDENCE OF DUI  +. O8  + .15 BAC BY TDPSCF LAB REPORT RESULTS, RES IPSO, IGITUTR  HAVE BEEN DENIED THEIR 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS TO A RETEST BY SAID SAME LAB AND TECHNICIAN NOT  “PUSUANT OF JUSTICE , SOLELY CONVICTION” IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD AS IN SAID CASE OF THE APPELLANT. RES IPSO, IGITUR ALL SAID HAVE PLAINITFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

TDPSCF LAB IS NOTORIOUS AND HAS BEEN FOUND CULPABLE BY FEDERAL (DOJ) AND TEXAS STATE (TEXAS FORENSIC SCIENCE COMMISSION) INVESTIGATORS  OF FALSIFYING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE REPORTS IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 AND TO MANUFACTURE EVIDENCE IN CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE PROSECUTIONS, THIS BEYOND DOING SO IN 100%. OF O TDPSFC LAB  IN THE TDPSSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD CASES IN TEXAS. ALL SAID CASES RAISE A MUTUALLY CORROBORATING REASONABLE DOUBT OF TDPSCF LAB REPORT INTEGRITY IN ALL TDPSCD/P FRAUD.

 

THIS  SAID MANUFACTURED BAC TDPSCF TEST REPORT DUI EVIDENCE FALLACIOUSLY BASED ON NON TESTED TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS’ PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES IS ALSO UN LAWFULLY SUPPRESSED IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND THE VITH AMENDMENT SPEEDY TRIAL RIGHT ALLEGEDLY DUE TO  TDPSCF LAB BACK LOG TIME NOT BEING IMMEDIATELY TESTED BEFORE JAILING FOR DUI AS  POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE TO BE GIVEN A HEARING AT SO CALLED P.C. COURT ALL SAID A SINE QUA NON IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD. ALLEGEDLY DUE TO BAC LAB BACKLOG,AT TDPSFC LAB HARRIS COUNTY AND AS A CRIMINAL ELEMENT SINE QUA NON OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  ALL TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS IN TEXAS ARE BY INSTANTER FALSELY JAILED  THEREBY AND NEVERTHELESS DENIED WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS VIA SAID TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SUPPRESSION VIA TDPSC LAB OF  POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES  AT P.C. HEARING.  SUPPRESSED IN THE QUISE OF  ALLEGED TDPSCF LAB “BACK LOG”  CAUSING THE POTENTIALLY EXONERATING PIRATED BAC BLOOD SAMPLES BY TDPSCF LAB  NOT BEING DONE- THE BAC TEST ON BLOOD SAMPLES ARE NOT DONE BECAUSE WE ARE BACK LOGGED AND DO NOT THEREFORE DO THE BAC TESTING IMMEDIATELY WITHIN TWO HOURS (VOLO CONTENDERE BAC TESTS ARE NOT EVER ACTUALLY DONE BY TDPSCF LAB OVER A MONTHS PERIOD ALLEGED BACK LOG, THIS IS AN EXONERATING EVIDENCE SUPPRESSION RUSE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT UNCONSTITUTIONAL TEXAS DUI TDPSCF LAB BAC TESTING PRACTICE IS IN VIOLATION OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DUE TO SAID SUPPRESSION OF BAC TEST PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES POTENTIALLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE NOT DONE WITHIN 24 HOURS FROM P.C. COURT HEARING. SAID UNCONSTITUTIONAL SUPPRESSION OF POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE FOR A MONTH BY TDPSCF LAB BACK LOG RUSE  CAUSE 100% OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION TO BE FALSELY JAILED IN 100% OF CASES SOLELY ON THE ALLEGED EXPERT BAC LEVEL PROBABLE CAUSE EVALUATION OF THE BAC IMPAIRMENT DEGREE BY TDPSHPO SWORN TESTIMONY SUCH AS BILLY CORLEY JR. IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, A SINE QUA NON IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. SAID SOLE TESTIMONY  AS A SOLE STANDARD OF DUI OFFENSE IMPAIRMENT FOR PROBABLE CAUSE, MOST ESPECIALLY WHEN THE INSTANTER ISSUING OFFICE HAS NOT PERSONALLY OBSERVED THE DUI SUSPECT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL BEFORE OR AFTER ARREST, SAID DUI BY A SINGLE OFFICER IS, AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE ARBITRARY AND THEREFORE UNLAWFUL AND THEREBY IN VIOLATION OF THE IVTH, VTH, AND VITH AMENDMENT AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.

 

PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT DERIVES FOR ANY ONE IN TEXAS WHO IS FALSELY  JAILED IN VIOLATION OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SINCE IN TEXAS DUI CODE THE  BAC TEST IS NOT DONE AND VERITBALE BAC REPORT COMPILED  AS EVIDENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE OF DUI GUILT OR INNOCENCE  BAC  + .08  BY AN INDEPENDENT LAB BEFORE JAILING,  IN PUBLIC HEARING AT P.C.COURT WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DUI ARREST, BUT TDPSCF LAB  ALLEGEDLY BACK LOGGED AND IN A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO MANUFACTURE ENHANCED CLASS MISDEMEANOR +.15 BAC INCRIMINATING  TDPSFC LAB TEST REPORTS IN ALL CASES IN TEXAS FOR INDICTMENT AND MAKING OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ,  ARE BY TDPSCF LAB ISSUED ABOUT  30 DAYS AFTER DUI  ARREST AND FALSE JAILING FOR DUI IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS  IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

A.S.A.P WITHIN TWO HOURS OF ARREST BY AN INDEPENDENT LAB NOT DIRECTLY EMPLOYED BY TDPSCF LAB, AND RES IPSO, IGITUR HAVING NO CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST SUCH AS CHI-ST. LUKE HAS- EMPLOYED DIRECTLY BY TDPSCF TO PIRATE BLOOD SAMPLES IN PERPETATION OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONS DUI/POM REVENEU FRAUD.

ALL SAID TO BE BY TEXAS STATE DUI CODE MANDATED AND OBSERVED IN EVERY CASE OF BAC TESTING OF DUI SUSPECT UNDER ARREST THERE FORE. SAID BAC TESTING BY TEXAS DUI CODE FOLLWED, IF THE DUI SUSPECT IS -.O8 SAID SUSPECT IS EXONERATED BY THE BAC TEST AND IMEDIATELY RELEASED FROM CUSTODY. IF INDEPENDENT BAC TEST RESULT’S ARE -.15, THE SUSPECT REMAINS UNDER ARREST AND IS JUSTLY JAILED FOR DUI PROBABLY CAUSE BUT CHARGED WITH DUI – .15 CLASS B MISDEANER, RATHER THAN CLASS A + .15 BAC.

 

 

 

 

IN TEXAS, BAC BLOOD SAMPLES AFTER PIRATING ARE SENT OFF BY MAIL BY DUI  INSTANTER ISSUING OFFICER IN A MUST HAVE A DUI CONVICTION IN EVERY CASE CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO THE TDPSFLAB HARRIS COUNTY BY THE HUNDRED’S OF THOUSANDS YEARLY NOT TO BE DONE AND REPORT ISSUED UNTIL AFTER THREE WEEKS- ABOUT A MONTH- INSURING THE DUI SUSPECT BY INSTANTER ALONE WITH NO CORROBORATING PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF ANY KIND AT P.C. HEARING  IS JAILED IN VIOLATION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. BEFORE MAILING PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES, THERE IS NO SAFEGARD, IN SAID CONFLICT OF INTEREST, THAT THE BLOOD SAMPLE CANNOT BE SWITCHED.

 

ALL OPEN CONTAINER DUI EVIDENCE BECAUSE OF  SAID CONFLICT OF INTEREST OF DUI INSTANTER ARREST OFFICER ARE UNDER A REASONABLE SUSPICION OF BEING  PLANTED  AND ARE NONETHELESS PER SE “IRRELEVANT’  TO LAWFUL  DUI PROSECUTION AND NOT ADMISSIBLE  AS EVIDENCE BY TEXAS RULE OF EVIDENCE 405 IN THE COMMISSION OF THE TDPS FIVE COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM  REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

EVERY ONE IN TEXAS  IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE FIVE COMMISSIONER’S TDPS DUI/POM FRAUD  VIA  ALL SAID MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF DUI/POM DERIVES  PLAINTIFF STANDING PER CAUSAM  DRIVER’S LICENSE UNCONSTITUTIONALLY SUSPENDED FOR BAC REFUSAL (CDL, CLASS C AND B, M), NO INSURANCE CHARGES  NOT TO BE BROUGHT BY TDTAC LAW BY THE TDPS  AGAINST NON PROFESSIONAL A/CDL DRIVERS, AND  DOUBLE JEOPARDY SURCHARGES TO RECEIVE DRIVER’S LICENSE BACK  AND OFFENSE  SURCHARGES PURSUANT OF DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD IN TANDEM WITH  THE 2003  TDPS DRIVER RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM AND ARL TEXAS ADMINSTRATION LICENSE REVOCATION PROGRAM.

 

SAID 2003 DRIVER RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM LIMITS WARRANTS BY THIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN ANY CASE ONLY “SUSPENSION” OF  COMMERICAL A/CDL LICENSE FOR LEGAL CAUSE, NOT CLASS C, B, OR M BY LAW. YET OVER 95% OF LICENSES SUSPENDED UNDER THIS LAW CURRENTLY ARE NOT COMMERCIAL A/CDL, BUT NON COMMERCIAL CLASS C, B, OR M NOT WARRANTED TO BE SUSPENDED BY THE 2003 DRIVERS RESPONSIBILITY LAW.

 

DRIVER RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM AND ARL IN TANDEM WITH FIVE COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD CORRUPTION DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION REVENUE FRAUD IS TEXAS STATE WIDE AND HAS UNDER COLOR OF LAW DENIED THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF MILLIONS IN TEXANS SINCE 2003 SUBJECTED TO FALSE IMPRISONMENT, EXTORTING FINES, TDPS SURCHARGES,  PROBATION FEES, AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNLAWFUL U NWARRANTED BY SAID LAW SUSPENSION AND CONFISCATION OF C/B/M NON COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S LICENSE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPELLANT’S CAUSE AS AN EXEMPLAR FOR PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT AGAINST THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM SUIT.

 

THE APPELLANT, AS AN EXEMPLAR CAUSE, IN SAME SAID APPEAL VIA COURT ORDER OF MANDAMUS,IN SAID  CLASS ACTION SUIT, REPRESENTS AND SPEAKS FOR  PLAINTIFFS WITH SAID MULTIPLE GROUNDS OF STANDING WHO THEREBY  FREELY TO ENJOIN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT AGAINST TDPSCD/P  REVENUE FRAUD HUNDREDS OF POTENTIAL PLAINTIFF’S WITH MULTIPLE SAID STANDINGS, IF NOT THOUSANDS IN SAN JACINTO COUNTY ALONE.  LOVETT AND  ACCOMPLICES,  UNABATED BY SAID MAY 19TH, 2017 MOCK NULL AND VOID MCC AT  LAW FIVE COURT ORDER, CONTINUE  AT THIS MOMENT TO PERPETRATE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE FRAUDULENT CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD NOT ONLY AGAINST THE APPELLANT ENCOURAGED BY THE LEGAL IMPOTENCE  OF SAID MAY 19TH MOCK COURT ORDER TO DISMISS EVERY OR ANY  TORT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE,  BUT MOREOVER,  AGAINST  ANYONE IN TEXAS  ENSNARED  UNDER COLOR OF LAW  IN THE COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD VIA THE SJC COURT OR ANY OTHER COURT IN TEXAS IN COLLUSION WITH TDPSHPO AND  SJC OR ANY OTHER SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT IN TEXAS.

 

 

SUCH SJC STILL MANIFEST IN SJC COURT JUDGE JOHN LOVETT ‘S MALICIOUS EXTRA JUDICIAL ANTICS IN COLLUSION IN GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION IN DEFRAUDING ANYONE IN TEXAS OF LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIA TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IS  EXHIBITED IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE IS A SJC COURT AND SJCSD LEGACY  DERIVING FROM  “TERROR ON THE 59” SJC SHERIFF “HUMPY” PARKER  REIGN OF FALSE ARREST ON THE 59, FALSE IMPRISONMENT TORTURE AND MURDER ABATED BY THREE DECADES OF  SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT JUDGES,  IN THE IMAGE AND LIKENESS OF JOHN LOVETT,  THE APPELLANT, UNLAWFULLY IN ABSENTIA SENTENCED  TO TWICE THE LEGAL MAXIMUM FOR DUI,   WAS BY ORDER OF LOVETT, PERSONA SOL,  JAILED FOR  365 DAYS IN THE SJC SD JAIL BUILT BY  HUMPY PARKER AND PROMINENTLY DISPLAYING HUMPY’S  PORTRAIT.

 

SUCH JUDGES LIKE JOHN LOVETT, THROUGH OUT TEXAS, IN COLLUSION WITH COMMISIONERS” TDPS DUI/POM  REVENUE FRAUD VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  VIOLATE UNDER COLOR OF LAW VIA SAID MALICIOUS PROSECUTION TACTICS OVER 200,000 IN TEXAS CIVIL RIGHTS: IVTH, VTH, VITH, VIIITH, XVIITH, XXITH AMENDMENTS AS WELL AS BY THE BAC TEST AS A PRISONER OF THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL WAR ON ALCOHOL, ALL HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER THE GENEVA CONVENTION   FORBADING EXPERIMENTATION ON PRISONERS OF WAR.   AS THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE NO: 2016-215 PROVES. TDPS COMMISSIONERS, DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE US CONSTITUTION   ANNUALLY SEEK TO DEFRAUD AND TO EXTORT IN SAID MANNER, IN TANDEM WITH THE EQUALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL D.C. CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE “PROGRAM ” (RECENT POLLS SHOW 89% OF TEXANS DO NOT SUPPORT CAF AS JUST AND CONSTITUTIONAL)  ALMOST 2.5 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR FROM  ANYONE IN TEXAS TRAPPED IN THE STATE WIDE WEB OF THE COMMISSIONERS   TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD AND 2003 SAFE DRIVING PROGRAM AND LICENSE REVOCATION PROGRAM TENTACLES.

 

THE COMMISSIONERS TDPS POM/DUI REVENUE FRAUD IS ROOTED IN ORGANIZED CRIME AS SUCH  SHIELDING  AS A COVER FROM DISCOVERY, ARREST,  HUMAN WORK AND CHILD SEX SLAVE, ARMS AND DRUG TRAFFICKED BY TILMAN FERTITA FREE STATE GALVESTON LEGACY IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON /HOUSTON  CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES  AND CATHOLIC CHARITIES  CHILD AND REFUGEE TRAFFICKING SYNDICATE.   CARDINAL DANIEL DINARDO AS PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS OVERSEES OPEN BORDER AND INTERNATIONAL TRAFFICKING  OF CHILDREN AND REFUGEES IN TEXAS IN CONJUNCTION WITH DHS, THE UN, AND THE POPE AND VATICAN RECEIVING BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TAX PAYER DOLLAR REVENUE FROM THYE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.   THE BUSH/CLINTON/HELU SINALOA CARTEL MASTERMINDED BY FR. MACIEL, MACIAL DEGOLADO AND POPE JOHN PAUL II VIA THE LEGIONARY OF CHRIST ACCOUNT AT THE ROTHSCHILD OWNED VATICAN BANK IS ALSO UNTIL 2006 A CENTRAL BENEFACTOR OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD’ TRAFFICKING SHIELDING ON THE I-10 AND I 59.   THIS  TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SHIELDING OF ORGANIZED CRIME TRAFFICKING OPERATIONS ON THE I-10 AND I-59 DUE TO ABSORPTION OF TEXAS STATES LAW ENFORCEMENT ON ALL LEVELS IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  FROM INVESTIGATION, INDICTMENT, ARREST, AND CONVICTIONS DERIVING FROM SAID ORGANIZED CRIME TRAFFICKING SYNDICATES AND CARTELS IN TEXAS   IS  PERPETUATED  BY THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT, EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATURE,  AND IN THE COURTS  BY JUDGES LIKE LOVETT, MACK, AND DAMICO  PARTICIPATION IN SAID  SHIELDING  BY  MONEY AND POWER ADDICTION TO  THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF ANYONE IN TEXAS CHARGED WITH DUI/POM.

 

TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT,  CITY POLICE,  SHERIFF,  TDPSHPO ARE REVENUE RAVENOUS. IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THE AVERAGE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ON THE STREET GENERATES 2.5 HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS SAID SCAM INCLUSIVE.  LEGISLATORS SWORN TO UPHOLD AND TO PROTECT THE CIVIL RIGHTS AND HUMAN DIGNITY OF ALL IN TEXAS, NOT WITHSTANDING,  PROPOSE, PASS, AND ENFORCE ALL SAID UNCONSTITUTIONAL MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  LAWS SUCH AS THE 2003 DRIVER’S SAFETY PROGRAM, LICENSE REVOCATION PROGRAM, BAC TEST REFUSAL LAW, ET AL. WHICH ARE ELEMENTS OF THE TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD AND SERVE AS GOVERNMENT AND POLICE FRONT AND AS AN INVISIBLE SHIELD- IN THE SAME WAY CARDINAL DINARDO AS PRESIDENT OF THE NCCB, POPE JP II AND NOW FRANCIS, AND FR. MACIEL AND THE LEGION OF CHRIST DO- IN  PROTECTING  AND PERPETUATING TRAFFICKING IN TEXAS, ESPECIALLY, BUT NOT EXCLUSIVELY  HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVERY  FROM INVESTIGATION, ARRESTS, AND CONVICTIONS.

 

THE PROVEN 100% EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD TO SHIELD AND TO PROTECT NOT TEXANS AND FOREIGN NATIONALS FROM CARTEL ORGANIZED CRIME RACKETS LIKE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, BUT  TO SHIELD AND PROTECT TILMAN FERTITA , SINALOA FEDERATION CARTEL SYNDICATED  CARDINAL DINARDO/FRANCIS ARCHDIOCESE GALVESTON/HOUSTON/NCCB PRESIDENT  (IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CHI-ST. LUKE  AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD-UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS-DR. KARPEN)   IS THE TOTAL  ECLIPSE OF COLLATERAL PROSECUTION OF ORGANIZED CRIME TRAFFICKING IN ALL FORMS BY TEXAS STATE GOVERNMENT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT: NO INVESTIGATIONS, NO ARREST, AND NOT CONVICTIONS OF TRAFFICKERS ALONG i-10 OR i-69.   TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT AND GOVERNMENT EFFORTS ARE   MONOPOLIZED  AND  ABSORBED COMPLETELY  BY FRAUDULENT  REVENUE REWARDS ADDICTION  IN THE COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM FRAUD.   RES IPSO, IGITUR,  NO LAWFUL ATTENTION ON ANY LEVEL BY STATE OR CHURCH IS EVER GIVEN TO THE ENDLESS  TRAFFICKING OPERATIONS BY SEMIS BY SAID ORGANIZED CRIME CARTEL’S ON I-10 AND I 69  TRAFFICKING SLAVES AND CHILD SEX SLAVES, DRUGS, AND ARMS, ONLY  AND EXCLUSIVELY TO DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF OVER THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND IN TEXAS EACH YEAR VIA THE COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD AND SAID TENTACLES.  THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS ARE THEMSELVES OLIGARCHS OF SAID ORGANIZED CRIME CARTELS.

 

 

 

APPELLANT’S SAID CAUSE NO 2016-215- SJCC AND SAID ESTOPPEL SERVES AS  SAID CLASS ACTION EXEMPLAR CASE OF SAID TEXAS STATE WIDE SYSTEMIC GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION AND COLLUSION IN SAID REVENUE FRAUD, GOVERNMENT/ POLICE RESOURCES  ADDICTIVELY ABSORBED BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE  FRAUD AND SHIELDING ORGANIZED CRIME TRAFFICKING FROM INVESTIGATION, ARREST, AND CONVICTION.

 

THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE NO: 2016-215- SJC COURT AS CLASS ACTION EXEMPLAR CASE

 

FACTUAL BASIS FOR EXEMPLAR STANDING IN CLASS ACTION SUIT

 

VIA TDPS OFFICERS AND SJCC ASS. DA PROSECUTORS OF THE COURT TO DEFRAUD AND TO EXTORT REVENUE AND POWER FROM THE PEOPLE IN  TEXAS STATE WIDE, SAID CAUSE NO. 2016 -215-AND FALSE CONVICTION FEB. 23, 2017 UNDER OATH IN A COURT OF LAW JOHN LOVETT PRESIDING, PERSONA SOL,  WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING, AS EVIDENCE PROVES  TDPS HPO AND SHERIFF DEPUTIES, ALL STATE WITNESSES  SWEARING IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 ENHANCED BY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE TO NON EXISTENT OFFENSE SITES BEFORE A JURY TO FEIGN JUDICIAL STANDING FOR THE SJCC AND LOVETT, AFTER FALSE ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE AND  STATE PROSECUTION FRAUDULENTLY MARKING DIFFERENT DATES OF OFFENCE FOR THE STATE’S CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ENHANCING THE IST DUI TO A CLASS A  MISDEMEANOR WITH A FRAUDULENT .231 BAC REPORT OF WHICH LOVETT DENIED THE APPELLANT’S MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHT TO HAVE RETESTED FOR VALIDITY IN CONJUNCTION WITH TDPSCF LAB POLICY NOT TO RETEST, IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION WAS ORCHESTRATED IN TANDEM BY LOVETT AND  ACCOMPLICES WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING WITH MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE  TO CONVICT ON 2/23/2017 THE APPELLANT IN ABSENTIA WITHOUT HIS FORE KNOWLEDGE OR PARTICIPATION IN VIOLATION OF HIS VITH AMEND RIGHTS. IN ABSENTIA ON APRIL 6TH  SENTENCING THE APPELLANT TO 365 DAYS  AND THEN ISSUING A FRAUDULENT  PROBATION ORDER TO COVER OVER THE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF A RELIGIOUS HATE CRIME AGAINST THE APPELLANT.  .

 

 

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR,  LL AND EVERY TDPS DUI  BAC REPORT  UNDERSIGNED , AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE,  BY RACHEL ABEL SWEARS IN A LEGAL COURT  DOCUMENT IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001, ENHANCED BY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, EACH AND EVERY TDPSCF LAB REPORT  IS “99.7 LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE”.   THIS SELF CERTIFYING “99.7 LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE” IS A SCIENTIFICALLY UNPROVEN DISTORTION ON THE LEVEL OF SELF CERTIFYING  2+2 = 10.  SELF CERTIFYING 2+2 =10  IS EQUIVALENT TO 2+2=10 AT “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL” ON GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY BECAUSE THE REPORT SAYS SO.  THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY IS RIGHT OUT OF 1984.  

 

MOREOVER, OVER 97% OF THESE MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE FALLACIOUS TDPSCF LAB UNDERSIGNED REPORTS STATE  BAC .2, OR  ON OCCASION TO PUNISH VICTIMS DARING TO QUESTION THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCAM BY EXERCISING CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS BY BAC REFUSAL, HIGHER IN APPELLANT’S CAUSE BAC. .231 BAC,   AT. BAC +.15 IST DUI IS ENHANCED FROM CLASS B MISDEMEANOR TO CLASS A.  ENHANCING THE DUI TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR DISQUALIFIES IPSO FACTO  DUI DEFENDANT  FOR DEFERRED ADJUDICATION AND PROBATION FOR FIRST DUI OFFENSE.  +.15 RAISES THE TERROR  TO 180 DAYS IN JAIL AND A  $10,000 DOLLAR FINE IF CONVICTED BY A JUDGE OR JURY TRIAL IN A COURT OF LAW PLACING ADDED PRESSURE TO PLEAD GUILTY FOR JAIL TIME SERVED-THREE DAYS, COURT COSTS, AND 12 MONTH PROBATION AND COSTS.  THE APPELLANT’S SPURIOUS .231 RAISES A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT THE BAC TEST BY TDPSCF LAB IS ACTUAL PREFORMED ON BLOOD SAMPLES, AND THAT THE GENERIC .2 BAC IS IN % BLOOD SAMPLES UNDERSIGNED BY BAC STATE EXPERT WITNESSES WITHOUT THE TEST ACTUALLY BEING DONE SINE QUA NON TO PERPETUATE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD DOES NOT ALLOW RETESTING OF SAID BAC REPORT UNDERSIGNED RESULTS BY THE UNDERSIGNER , IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, RACHEL AUBEL, BY UNWRITTEN POLICY, RES IPSO IGITUR DENYING DE FACTO APRIORI ALL AND EVERYONE IN TEXAS IN THE FRAUDULENT CONTEXT OF THE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD THEIR 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS TO RETEST (FOR JUSTICE AND NOT JUST FOR CONVICTION) DNA/BAC EVIDENCE FOR LEGALITY AND VALIDITY.   EVERY AND ALL DUI CONVICTIONS VIA PLEA BARGAINING GUILTY  IN THE SATE OF TEXAS BEG THE QUESTION, WHAT SCIENTIFIC PROOF EXISTS (NONE) THAT THE TDPSCFLAB BAC REPORT BRANDISHED AT PLEA BARGAINING IS “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL,”  AND AS SUCH, WAS THE BAC TEST ACTUALLY PERFORMED ON MY BLOOD SAMPLES, OR JUST A GENERIC RESULT ASSIGNED BAC .2 IN 90% OF CASES  TO INCREASE PRESSURE FROM INCREASED SANCTION FROM ENHANCEMENT TO CAM  TO INTIMIDATE AND COMPEL A GUILTY PLEA IN SO CALLED PLEA BARGAINING WITHOUT LEGAL COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATION PRESENT. RES IPSO, IGITUR ALL SAID PLEA BARGAINED GUILTY PLEAS FOR DUI/POM ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT PER SE.  AS SUCH, ALL DUI CONVICTS IN TEXAS IN THE FRAUDULENT CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD HAVE STANDING THEREBY IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

 

SAID TDPSCF LAB MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED  EVIDENCE  + .15  BAC REPORTS TO JUSTIFY FALSE IMPRISONMENT  AFTER THE FACT FOR DUI CLASS A MISDEMEANOR ARE  RETURNED TO THE LOCAL PROSECUTING COURT AT  A COST TO TAX PAYERS OF $60.00  THIS IS ANOTHER  REVENUE FRAUD STREAM  IN THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.  OVER 200,000   PEOPLE IN TEXAS AND THERE FAMILIES AND EMPLOYERS ARE VICTIMIZED ANNUALLY BY THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD CREATING AN ALMOST MONTH LOG BACK LOG AT THE SOLE HARRIS COUNTY TDPSCF LAB IN DOING THE BAC TEST AND AUTHORING THE BAC REPORT.   TDPS BAC FALLACIOUS  SPURIOUS REPORTS FROM TDPSFC LAB,  COME BACK ALMOST A MONTH  AFTER THE DUI OFFENSE DATE, (THE APPELLANT HAS TWO DIFFERENT OFFICIAL DUI OFFENSE DATES –ACTUALLY THREE- APRIL 4, APRIL 5, 2-16, AND DECEMBER 24, 2015- BUT THE DATE ON THE BAC REPORT IN SAID CAUSE INDICATES APRIL 4, 2016 DATE, NOT THE SENTENCING, PROBATION APRIL 6TH DATE STATING THE DUI OFFENSE DATE AS DECEMBER 24, 2015 AS WELL AS THE STATE’S CRIMINAL COMPLAINT DATE OF OFFENSE DECEMBER 24, 2015 IN SAID APPELLANT’S CAUSE DATE.

 

DURING THIS BACKLOG, THE MAILED BAC BLOOD SAMPLES FOR DUI PROSECUTION EVIDENCE ARE NOT REFRIGERATED CAUSING FERMENTATION OF ALCOHOL, IF PRESENT IN THE BLOOD SAMPLES RAISING THE BAC, THUS MANUFACTURING EVIDENCE OF DUI GUILT  AT A HIGHER BAC LEVEL.  THE HARRIS COUNTY BACK LOG SERVES AS A COVER  FOR  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SINE QUA NON,  TO GET THE $60 DOLLAR FOR THE BAC TEST REPORT , THE BAC TEST IN A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN MANUFACTURING +

 

 

 

APPELLANT’S  SPECIOUS DPSTCF LAB BAC OF .231 SWORN WITH 99.7 %  DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE BY DPSCF LAB  BAC TECHNICIAN RACHEL AUBEL WHO SWORE THE SAME .231 BAC RESULT OF THE APPELANT UNDER OATH IN SJCC 2/23/17  FALSELY CONVICTED THE APPELLANT IN ABSENTIA OF A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR BECAUSE THE BAC WAS GREATER THAN .15 BAC

 

 

 

TO SWEAR IN A COURT OF LAW, AS RACHEL AUBEL DID TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT, THE BAC TEST IS CONFIDENCE LEVEL 99.7 IS SCIENTIFICALLY BASELESS. NO ONE KNOWS IN TRUTH HOW ACCURATE THE BAC  IS.  USING THIS SPECIOUS SCIENTIFIC DISTORTION OF SCIENTIFICALLY UNKNOWN FACT-THE TRUTH IS NO ONE KNOWS WITH ANY TYPE OF CERTAINTY HOW ACCURATE THE BAC TEST IS FOR NUMEROUS REASONS, , WITHOUT BENEFIT OF ATTORNEY IN PLEADING, DISTRICT ATTORNEY SEEKING ONLY CONVICTIONS AND NEVER JUSTICE, USE TDPSFCL SPECIOUS BAC REPORT HOAX TO  INTIMIDATE OUT OF IGNORANCE AND DEFRAUD  ALMOST 99.7 % OF TEXANS TO PLEAD GUILTY TO DUI BASED ON TDPSCFLAB MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE IN DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BAC TEST.

 

  IN SAID CAUSE 2016-215, SJCC ASS. DA SJC MARK BOEMIO IN A PHONE CONVERSATION WITH THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE INQUIRING TO KNOW HIS BAC TEST RESULTS ATTEMPTED TO USE THIS COMPLETE FRAUD, AS HE HAS DONE IN ALMOST 99% OF ALL DUI CASES IN SJC TO GET THE APPELLANT TO PLEAD GUILTY, DEFRAUDING THE APPELLANT TO GIVE UP HIS RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY JURY. THE DEFENDANT PRO SE HEARING FROM HIS SJCC DAO FILE THAT SAID BAC WAS .231 HELD THE PHONE AWAY AND LAUGHED.. THE TDPS OFFICER, BILLY CORLEY JR. AS WELL AS THE BLOOD TAKERS AT CHI-ST.LUKE WERE PERSONALLY INCENSED THE APPELLANT HAD REFUSED THE BAC TEST AND TOLD THEM THEY WERE VIOLATING AS DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE CONSTITUTION THE IVTH AND VTH AMENDMENTS AS WELL AS THE GENEVA ACCORDS IN THEIR SELF PROFESSED WAR ON ALCOHOL-THIS IS WHAT NAZI’S DO TO POLITICAL PRISONERS.  THESE WORDS BY THE OUTRAGED APPELLANT TRIGGERED A REVENGE BAC.231 SPURIOUS REPORT BY CHI ST. LUKE’S AND THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

IN RETALIATION FOR SPEAKING ABOUT THE VIOLATION OF SAID RIGHTS, THE TDPS BAC REPORT CAME BACK FROM HARRIS COUNTY AT BAC  .231- ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT. HIGHER THAN .15 DISQUALIFIES 1ST DUI  SUSPECTS FROM DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION PROGRAMS AND  ENHANCES THE 1ST DUI OFFENSE TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY 180 DAYS IN JAIL AND A $10,000 FINE. ASS. DA. MARK BOEMIO OVER THE PHONE THREATENED THE APPELLANT WITH THIS DRACONIAN PUNISHMENT IF HE DID NOT “PLEA BARGAIN” GUILTY.  WHEN APPELLANT SAID (.231 BAC) IT CANNOT POSSIBLY BE THAT-BOEMIO SAID, “I DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT FORENSIC SCIENCE, BUT I DO KNOW THIS, THE BAC IS 99.7 “LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE ”   AND BAC OVER .15  IS SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE AT THAT LEVEL  1ST DUI IS ENHANCED FROM  CLASS B TO CLASS A  MISDEMEANOR”  YOU ARE FACING SIX MONTHS IN JAIL AND 10,000$ FINE IF FOUND GUILTY,    WHEN APPELLANT DECLINED TO PLEA BARGAIN  EVER, SAYING THE BAC  .231 TEST REPORT RESULTS  ARE NOT POSSIBLE, BOEMIO RESPONDED WITH A DISAUSIVE DIATRIBE STATING ALTHOUGH IN OUR SYSTEM YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO RETEST,  DE FACTO TDPS BAC REPORT  RETESTING IS IMPLAUSIBLE  BE CAUSE OF (YOUR) EXPENSE  AND FINDING A MUTUALLY ACCEPTABLE  LAB TO RETEST LAWFULLY CREDIBLE TO RETEST. BOEMIO CONTINUED SAYING  HE DID NOT KNOW IF IT WAS POSSIBLE TO SPLIT THE SAMPLE FOR RETESTING-ALL LYING DISTORTIONS BY BOEMIO TO DISSAUDE THE APPELLANT FROM CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY  OF THE BAC RESULTS BY A RETESTING.  THIS ATTEMPTED AND UNSOLICITED  FRAUDULENT PLEA BARGAN CAMPAIGN  BY BOEMIO, A LIAR, INDICATES THE APPELLANT’S REFUSAL TO PLEA BARGIN AND SETTLE IS EXTREMELY RARE AND THE STATE PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P HAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOT ALLOWING FOR A DISPUTED BAC RETEST IN UNIVERSAL VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW.  IN CONCLUSION,  FINALLY, EXASPERATED, BOEMIO SAID, IF THE DEFENDANT PLEAD GUILTY HE WOULD ONLY GET TWO TO FOUR MONTHS OF PROBATION, AND COURT COSTS OF ABOUT TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS.  TEMPTING, BUT IT WAS ALL A LIE.  2ND DUI IS DRASTICALLY WORSE THAN THE FIRST.  IN PLEADING GUILTY TO A LIE, THERE WAS NO GUARANTEE THE APPELLANT WOULD NOT NOR COULD NOT BE INNOCENTLY TRAPPED AGAIN IN THE SAME TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCAM DRIVING ON THE I-59.

 

THE BLOOD DRAWERS AT CHI-ST. LUKE A MONTH BEFORE, JUSTIFIED THEMSELVES IN FACE OF THE APPELLANT’S CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST THEM FOR VIOLATED HIS CIVIL AND GENEVA CONVENTION HUMAN RIGHTS BY ARRESTED AND UNDER DURESS AND THREAT STEALING HIS BLOOD TO INCRIMINATE HIM,  ROD HUPPARD WHO STOLE THE BLOOD ESPOUSING THE END ALWAYS JUSTIFIES THE MEANS, EVEN AND ESPECIALLY AN EVIL MEANS SAID, WE DO THIS TO KEEP DRUNKS LIKE YOUR  FROM KILLING CHILDREN IN CAR ACCIDENTS. A MANTRA OF MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING, A NEO PROHIBITION NON PROFIT FRAUD ORGANIZATION DENOUNCED AS SUCH BY MADD’S FOUNDER CHRISTINE LEICHTNER AS NEO PROHIBITIONIST AND NOT TAKING DRUNKEN DRIVERS OF THE ROAD BEFORE THEY KILL THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.  THE APPELLANT SUPPORTS MANDATORY SENTENCE OF 180 DAYS AND ABSOLUTE SUSPENSION FOR A YEAR OF DRIVER’S LICENSE FOR ANY ONE VALIDLY CONVICTED OF DUI AT THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT BAC  .231.   IF THAT IS THEIR NOBLE LIE- KEEPING DRUNKS LIKE YOU OFF THE ROAD SO YOU DO NOT KILL CHILDREN- IN JUSTIFYING THIS TDPS C/DUI REVENUE FRAUD, WHY WOULD BOEMIO  OFFER A DUI  DEFENDANT  AT BAC  .231, ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT OFF SO LIGHTLY JUST SO THE APPELLANT WOULD NOT PURSUE A RETESTING OF THE OBVIOUSLY FRAUDULENT .231 BAC RESULT. APPELLANT SUPPORTS THE LAW IF YOU ARE LAWFULLY CONVICTED OF 1ST DUI AT .231-AT .231 BAC LEVEL YOU ARE COMPLETELY IMPAIRED OF ALL MENTAL AND PHYSICAL CAPACITIES, AND AS SUCH AN IMMINENT MURDEROUS ACCIDENT BEHIND THE WHEEL IN EVERY INSTANCE,  YOU SERVE 180 DAYS WITHOUT PROBATION, A TEN THOUSAND DOLLAR FINE, AND ONE YEAR SUSPENSION OF LICENSE.  THE  APPELLANT IS DUI LAW ABIDING  AND THIS IS  THE REASON THE APPELLANT WOULD NOT PLEAD “TO GET OFF EASY”  IN THIS MALICIOUS FRAUD. BUT 99% DO!

 

 

 

RACHEL AUBELS SAID FALSE TESTIMONY  2/23/17 SJCC-2016-215- RAISES A REASONABLE DOUBT IN ALL DUI CASES IN TEXAS THAT TDPS BAC TESTS ARE NOT ACTUALLY DONE AND A  TRUE BAC TEST REPORT RESULT IS VALIDLY AND ACTUALLY REGISTERED IN THE TDPSFC LAB  REPORTS. IN ALL CASES. ALL TEXANS CONVICTED WITH BAC EVIDENCE FROM SAID LAB OF DUI CLASS A HAVE STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT PERCAUSAM  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, ALL TDPS DUI BAC REPORTS ARE DONE BY THE FORENSICS TDPSFC LAB IN HARRIS COUNTY, THE TDPSFC LAB  IN HARRIS COUNTY IS NOTORIOUSLY CORRUPT AND BACKLOGGED. JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICED DENIED. THE BAC MONTH LONG BACKLOG IS A  VIOLATION OF  THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND THE VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR AND SPEEDY TRIAL. THE BACK LOG SUPPRESSES POTENTIALLY EXONERATING PHYSICAL EVIDENCE INSURING IN VIOLATION OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS THE SUBJECT WILL BE JAILED UNTIL BAILED OUT.    TDPS HARRIS COUNTY LA HAS BEEN SEVERAL TIMES FEDERALLY INVESTIGATED FOR MANUFACTURED OF EVIDENCE IN NUMEROUS CASES AND FOUND CULPABLE  BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT OF MANUFACTURING EVIDENCE, I.E. MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

 

 TDPSFCL HAS A SYSTEMIC CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A GOVERNMENT MONOPOLY ON BAC REPORTS STATE WIDE. THE 60$ TAX PAYER CHARGE IS PART OF THE DUI/POM PROSECUTION CASH COW SCAM.

 

  TDPSCF LAB BAC TESTING NOT ACTUALLY BEING DONE OR THE POSSIBILITY OF SAID BAC RESULT BEING RETESTED PURSUANT OF THE MICHAEL MORTON LAW AS THE APPELLANT REQUESTED AND WAS AB INITIO DENIED HIS RIGHT TO RETEST UNDER SAID LAW BY LOVETT, ARE EVIDENCE IN  THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE AND IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.  IN BOTH THESE CRIMINAL ELEMENTS OF  DUI FRAUD PURSUANT OF ILL GOTTEN REVENUE BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  IS EVIDENT BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT IN RACHEL AUBEL FALSELY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT OF 1ST DUI+. 15 IN SJCC AS A TEXAS STATE EXPERT WITNESS ON 2/23/17 WITH A TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT UNDERSIGNED BY HER.

 

 JOHN LOVETT, IN DISCOVERY COURT SJCC JANUARY 9TH, 2017, DENIED THE APPELLANT HIS 2012  MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS “STATE PROSECUTORS SHOULD WORK FOR JUSTICE NOT CONVICTIONS’ TO TEST DNA-BAC EVIDENCE IF THERE IS A REASONABLE DOUBT OF VERACITY PURSUANT OF JUSTICE, NOT CONVICTION.  APPELLANT MADE MOTION TO RETEST BAC. 231 FRAUDULENTLY ATTRIBUTED TO THE APPELLANT AND WROTE A COURT ORDER FOR LOVETT TO SIGN THAT LOVETT ORDER RACHEL AUBEL WHO ON 2/23/2017 WAS A WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION FOR THE SAME BAC.231 UNDER OATH, TO RETEST HER INITIAL REPORT RESULTS OF BAC. 231.  ON JANUARY 9TH IN DISCOVERY COURT THE ASS. DA, MARK BOEMIO OBJECTED TO SAID ORDER WRITTEN BY THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE AND SAID THEY TDPSFL HAD BEEN ASKED BEFORE SEVERAL TIMES  BY THE SJC DA OFFICE AND ALWAYS REFUSED TO HAVE THEIR OWN TECHNICIANS RETEST A PREVIOUSLY TESTED SAMPLE AND WILL NO DO IT.  BOEMIO IS A LIAR, I DOUBT BOEMIO ASKED EVER FOR A BAC TEST  EVEN ONCE, BUT BOEMIO’S POINT IS TAKEN NEVERTHELESS AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE  SO IN ALL DUI DEFENSE CAUSES, THE POLICY OF THE  TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY IN ALL  DUI BAC RETESTING IS DENIED IN VIOLATION BY THE STATE’S PROSECUTION OF EVERY DUI CONVICT IN TEXAS CONVICTED WITH MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED  TDPSCF LAB  BLOOD TEST EVIDENCE OF THEIR 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW DNA/ABC RETEST RIGHTS.

 

 RES IPSO IGITUR, IN BAC TESTING, APPELLANT’S  CAUSE AND IN ALL DUI CONVICTION CAUSES IN TEXAS , MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED NOT ONLY BY JOHN LOVETT, BUT IN EVERY DUI CASE  IN TANDEM WITH  RACHEL AUBEL AND THE TDPSFCL.  APPELLANT THEN MADE MOTION TO HAVE A THIRD PARTY LAB RETEST THE BLOOD SAMPLE WHICH APPELLANT KNEW WAS SPURIOUS AND VINDICTIVE  AT BAC. .231.  SAID .231 BAC  WAS NOT IN ANY WAY EVIDENCED  BY BILLY CORLEY’S DUI P.C. OFFENSE REPORT, (EXHIBIT 6).  TO THE CONTRARY AT THE TIME OF HIST FALSE ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE ON APRIL 4TH, 2016 BY SJCDS JESSE SLAUGHTER ON THE I-59 LIBERTY COUNTY, THE APPELLANT’S  BAC  WAS OO.OO .  THE APPELLANT COULD SWEAR UNDER OARTH IN A COURT OF LAW WITH 100% SCIENTIFIC BAC CERTAINTY BY HIS LIVER THAT HE , THE APPELLANT HAD NO ALCOHOL IN HIS BLOOD AT THE TIME OF HIS FALSE ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCAM.

 

TO CONTINUE…

 

JOHN LOVETT,  SEEMINGLY ALWAYS INTOXICATED AS WITNESSED BY THE APPELLANT AT ALL  COURT HEARINGS  ATTENDED,  ALLEGEDLY IN HEARSAY, LOVETT DRINKS LITERS OF DIET COKE SPIKED WITH JACK, IF SO , (APPELLANT COULD OBSERVE LOVETT INTOXICATED, BUT COULD NOT KNOW THE TRUE CONTEXTS OF SAID LITERS’)  IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF EVERY DEFENDANT WHO GOES BEFORE LOVETT IN SJCC,   BELLIGERENTLY SAID, “YOU LOST THAT!” DENYING APPELLANT HIS MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS TO RE TEST THE SPURIOUS  BAC FOR VERACITY BY THE TDPSCFL FORENSIC SCIENTIST STATE BAC EXPERT WITNESS RACHEL AUBEL. 

 

 

ALL ENJOINING  SAID CLASS ACTION  AS PLAINTIFF  HAVE ENHANCED STANDING , I.E. ANYONE IN  TEXANS WRONG BY THIS TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM CASH COW FRAUD, IN BEING  INJURED MORE GRIEVOUSLY  BY  FRAUDULENT DUI CHARGES ENHANCED TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR  BY SAID MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE BAC REPORTS.  90% OF BAC RESULTS IN TEXAS ARE AT .20 AND HIGHER- NOT ONE REPORT OUT OF MILLIONS THUS FAR HAS EVER COME BACK FROM SAID LAB BELOW .O8, BECAUSE OF A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO MANUFACTURE AND SUPPRESS EXONERATING EVIDENCE BELOW BAC .08  IN BLOOD SAMPLES,  AND ABOVE-. ON THE CONTRARY IN PERPETRATING THE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD OVER 90% OF BAC BLOOD SAMPLES  IN ALL BAC BLOOD SAMPLES ALLEGEDLY SUBMITTED IN TEXAS TO THE TDPS CF LAB TRIGGER TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORTS  THE  .2 OR OVER. THIS RUSE GUARANTEES THE TDPSHPO INSTANTER OFFICER, DUI PROSECUTING COURT AND JAIL CANNOT BE SUED FOR FALSE ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT- MALICIOUS PROSECUTION- BY A DUI/POM THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCAM PLAINTIFF. AS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

 THE VERY  SAME CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO INSURE BY MANUFACTURED OF BAC REPORTS ABOVE .15 IN ALL CASES, AN SUPPRESSION OF ALL BLOOD SAMPLE EXONERATING EVIDENCE OF BAC.  -.O8,  MANDATES  UNCONSTITUTIONAL “NO REFUSAL” TAKING OF BLOOD IN EVERY DUI PROSECUTION WHEN AN INSTANTER IS ISSUED BY TDPSHPO,  NO MATTER IMPLIED VOLUNTARY AND EVEN IN SPITE OF THE SIGNED DIC 24 REFUSAL OF THE DUI/POM SCAM VICTIM.  UNLIKE OTHER STATES, LIKE NEBRASKA, IN TEXAS, IN EVERY CASE, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, BLOOD SAMPLE MUST BE TAKEN IN EVERY DUI CASE FOR MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE  BAC +.15 AND TO SUPPRESS EXONERATING BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE AT BAC .08 TO PRECLUDE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SUITS  LIKE THIS CLASS ACTION SUIT FROM OCCURRING AND SUSTAIN THE DUI/POM SCAM FROM SAID LAW SUIT FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

 

 

 

AS SUCH, TDPSFC LAB  FORENSIC  TDPSFC LAB  FORENSIC  IS ANNUALLY TASKED WITH OVER 2OO,OOO  FRAUDULENT MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE FOR DUI PLEA BARGAINING CONVICTIONS BAC REPORTS AT $60 A SHOT TO BE PAID FOR BY THE LOCAL COUNTY TAX PAYER.  BACKLOGGED BY THE TOTAL ABSORPTION OF THE TEXAS COURTS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD TO MASS PRODUCE SAID TDPSCF LAB  +.15  BAC REPORT , THE TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY, EVEN IF THEY HAD TIME AND NON DEDICATED PERSONAL,  HAVE  NEVERTHELESS  NO FINANCIAL OR MORAL WORK ETHIC  TO TEST FIVE TO SIX THOUSAND UNTESTED RAPE KITS FROM  HARRIS COUNTY ALONE WHICH HAVE SAT FOR YEARS AND ARE PRESENTLY STILL  NOT TESTED AND PROCESSED, BECAUSE PROCESSED RAPE KITS PURSUANT  OF  PROSECUTING AND CONVICTING RAPISTS DOES NOT PAY $60 A SHOT, AND TAKES TIME TO ACTUALLY DO THE DNA TESTING, AND WHEN DONE TAKES THE STATE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICES’  COURTS AND  LAW ENFORCEMENT AWAY FROM THE DUI/POM SCAM. THE TDPSCF LAB DOES TAKE THE TIME AS SHOWN BY RECENT FEDERAL INVESTIGATION TO MANUFACTURE DNA EVIDENCE FOR CONVICTS ON DEATH ROW IN TEXAS  (OR SUPPRESS EXONERATING  DNA RETESTING AS IN THE CASE OF MICHAEL MORTON WHO SPENT 26 YEARS AS AN INNOCENT MAN IN TEXAS ON DEATH ROW) AND DRUG OFFENSE CASES OTHER THAN DUI/POM.

 

 SAID BAC “CONFIDENCE LEVEL” 99.7.A DISTORTION APPEARING ON ALL TDPS BAC REPORTS  INVALIDATING THEM AS EVIDENCE OF DUI GUILT IN ALL CASES GIVES STANDING AS PLAINTIFFS TO ALL IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI THEREBY.

 

 ALCOHOL IN BLOOD FERMENTS CAUSING AN INCREASING BAC LEVEL IF THE SAMPLES ARE NOT REFRIGERATED, BLOOD SAMPLES ARE NOT REFRIGERATED DURING CHAIN OF CUSTODY OF EVIDENCE. THE DUI INSTANTER ISSUING TDPSHP OFFICER ENGENDERS A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST  MANDATING MANUFACTURE/SUPPRESSING OF BLOOD SAMPLE BAC EVIDENCE INSURING THE BLOOD SAMPLES  DO NOT DIRECTLY GENERATE A REPORT BELOW .O8, OR THE TDPSHP OFFICER WHO ISSUES THE INSTANTER AND ACCOMPLICES INCLUDING PRESIDING JUDGE AND JAIL CAN BE SUED BY PLAINTIFF FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AS IN APPELLANT’S CAUSE SO IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT. ONLY TDPSHP OFFICERS ALONE AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT IN A FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAM TO COMBAT DUI,  ISSUE INSTANTERS- WHICH DE FACTO-WARRANT THE DUI SUSPECT IN CUSTODY IS JAILED FOR 72 HOURS  BEFORE BAIL BASED ON THE OFFICER’S BAC ASSESSMENT AND SWORN OFFENSE REPORT TESTIMONY ALONE.

 

 

 

THE ONLY EVIDENCE IS  DUI INSTANTERS ARE ISSUED BY TDPSHP OFFICERS IN 100% OF THE DUI CASES  AFTER ARREST.  RES IPSO, IGITUR, UNLESS THE BLOOD SAMPLE AFTER INSTANTER TRIGGERS A REPORT ABOVE BAC .O8, OVER 90% AT BAC .2 OR ABOVE, THE OFFICER AND ACCOMPLICES IN THE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD DUI/POM SCAM  CAN BE SUED FOR TIME OF FALSE   JAILING BY PLAINTIFF, AND A SECOND JUDGEMENT FOR ALL HARM DONE ON ANY LEVEL.

 

 

 

RELINQUISHING BLOOD SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY, THE INSTANTER OFFICER S  MAILS THE BLOOD SAMPLE OF NOW JAILED DUI SUSPECT TO THE TDPSCF LAB IN HARRIS COUNTY LAB. IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, AND IN ALL DUI CASES IN TEXAS, THE APPELLANTS  BLOOD WAS STOLEN UNDER THREAT OF VIOLENCE VIA COLOR OF LAW VIOLATION OF SAID CIVIL RIGHTS, ESPECIALLY THE IVTH AND VTH, AND  ILLEGALLY SEIZED TO INCRIMINATE THE APPELLANT IN A GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION SCAM. MOREOVER, THE BAC BLOOD SAMPLE TAKEN CAN BE SWITCHED OR ALTERED  AT ANYTIME, BY ANYONE, UP TO THE POINT OF MAILING, OR AT THE LAB.  THERE ARE NO SAFE GUARDS TO PREVENT THIS INHERENT IN THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY.  THIS GIVES PLAINTIFF STANDING TO ANY ONE CONVICTED ON DUI IN TEXAS  IN THE CONTEXT OF THE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  SAID TDPS HARRIS COUNTY LAB DOES HUNDRED’S OF THOUSANDS INTO THE MILLIONS  OF THESE PER SE FRAUDULENT UNSECURED +.15  BAC REPORTS FOR THIS SCAM ALSO ADDING TO THE LACK OF QUALITY CONTROL OF THE BAC REPORT EVEN IF THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY WAS NOT A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND THE BAC TEST REPORT PER SE SPECIOUS  IN THE FIRST PLACE. THE MORE INVOLVED IS TESTING THE MORE THE PROBABILITY OF ERROR. THIS IS THE REASON WHY THE VERY SAME TDPSCF LAB BAC TECHNICIAN WHO UNDERSIGNS DISPUTED BAC REPORT MUST IN ACCORD WITH THE MICHAEL MORTON LAW, RETEST THE UNDERSIGNED REPORT’S RESULTS WHEN MOTION IN DISCOVERY.

 

JOHN LOVETT IS THE FIRST AND ONLY  PERSON IN TEXAS TO VOLUNTARILY GIVE BLOOD SAMPLES TO THE TDPSFCLAB WITH NO DUI INSTANTER ISSUED AT AN ACCIDENT SCENE WHERE LOVETT ADMITS FAULT AND WAS NOT CITED FOR NOT HAVING INSURANCE BY HIS TDPSHPO CRONIES IN SJC IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  

 

 

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A TDPS BAC REPORT FROM THE HARRIS COUNTY LAB  RETURNED BELOW BAC .O8. THE FIRST INSTANCE OF A BAC REPORT RETURNED BELOW .08, OR MOST LIKELY .OO  WILL MOST LIKELY BE  SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT’S “VOLUNTARY” BAC BLOOD DRAW WITH NO DUI INSTANTER  ISSUED ON MAY1ST, 2017.  LOVETT’S VOLUNTARY BAC TEST RESULT HAVE CERTAINLY BEEN PROCESSED BY NOW  (BECAUSE OF LAB BACKLOG THE SPURIOUS BAC REPORTS USUALLY TAKE A MONTH) AND THE REPORT MADE, AND YET THE TDPS NOR LOVETT HAVE MADE THE RESULTS PUBLIC AS  WAS PROMISED BY BOTH LOVETT AND THE TDPS AS REPORTED IN San jacinto News Times, Thursday, May 11, 2017:

 

 

JOHN LOVETT, INTOXICATED-APPELLANT CONTENDS AS ALWAYS- ON MAY, 1, ON FM 2666   “IN AN UNUSUAL PROCEDURE”-(IT’S CALLED COVER UP)  A DPS REPORT DIDN’T LIST THIS TWO DRIVERS INVOLVED IN A  VEHICLE ACCIDENT- San jacinto News Times, Thursday, May 11, 2017- )

 

SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT AND THE TDPSHP PERPETRATE IN TANDEM SAID DUI/POM SCAM AS IS EVIDENT IN APPELLANT’S APPEAL .  COVERING UP FOR CRONIES,  PART AND PARCEL IN TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  TRIGGERED  LOVETT BEING GIVEN AN “UNUSUAL PROCEDURE” I.E. SPECIAL TREATMENT, BY TDPSHPO,  TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE BY NOT BEING CHARGED WITH DUI AT THE SCENE OF AN ACCIDENT WHERE LOVETT ADMITS FAULT.  SUCH A RECKLESS  ACCIDENT IS INDICATIVE OF BAC .231.   AND LOVETT BY THE TDPSHPO AT TAX PAYER EXPENSE TO VOLUNTARILY DRAW BLOOD SAMPLES AT CRONY FACILITY CHI-ST. LUKES FOR A FRAUDULENT BAC TEST EXONERATING LOVETT OF GOSSIP VIA POLITICALLY MOTIVATED HEAR SAY LOVETT WAS DUI AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT. LOVETT WAS DUI AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT.

 

SAID  “UNUSUAL”  PROCEDURE BY TDPSHPO IS A VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION AND AS SUCH  GIVE STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT AS PLAINTIFF TO ALL IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI IN THE CONTEXT OF  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD NOT AFFORDED SAID ” UNUSUAL PROCEDURE” BY TDPSHPO IN BEING CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS.

 

ACCORDING TO THE NEWSPAPER ACCOUNT,  LOVETT WAS SEEN  BY A WITNESS AT THE ACCIDENT SCENE RECKLESSLY SWERVING ACROSS the yellow MEDIAN LINE UNTIL STRIKING ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD  THE PRIUS OF A FIFTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL WITH LOVETT’S TRUCK. SUCH RECKLESS DRIVING AND ACCIDENT IS AN INDICATOR OF BAC.231  LOVETT WAS NOT CITED BY THE DPS HP OFFICER FOR DUI, NOR RECKLESS DRIVING AND CAUSING OF POTENTIALLY FATAL COLLISION, NOR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- NO INSURANCE- A CLASS B MISDEMEANOR AT THE TIME OF THE CRASH.- AGAIN LOVETT AND TDPSHP ARE CRONIES IN DUI/POM SCAM CRIME WHOSE  PREDATORY PERIMETERS LOVETT HIMSELF DRUNK  HAD CROSSED INTO ON  MAY 1ST.

 

Lovett told dps at scene of the dui  HE WAS DISTRACTED BY TEXTING TRYING TO ARRANGE AN EMERGENCY HEALTH   DETENTION WARRANT AS PART OF MY OFFICIAL DUTIES, AND WAS ON MY WAY TO THE COURTHOUSE ( APPELLANT INTERVIEWED SEVERAL  SJCC DEFENDANTS,  WHILE  FALSELY AND MALICIOUSLY IMPRISONED IN SJC JAIL  BY THIS COMPASSIONATE, DUTY DRIVEN  SJCC JUDGE,  ALL STATE LOVETT IS ALWAYS INTOXICATED AT THEIR HEARINGS  IN THE COURTHOUSE- THE APPELLANT IN ALL HEARINGS HE HAS HIMSELF ATTENDED  CORROBORATES.)  “LOVETT VOLUNTERILY SUBMITTED TO A BLOOD DRAW” “TO PROVE  THAT THERE WAS NO IMPAIRMENT IN AN EFFORT TO AVOID RAMPANT SPECULATION .”

 

BY TEXAS BAC TEST LAW, THE  BAC TEST, PROCESSED AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE, CANNOT BE ADMINISTERED VOLUNTARILY OR NOT VOLUNTARILY UNLESS AN INSTANTER FOR DUI HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR PROBABLE CAUSE BY THE TDPSHP OFFICER AT THE DUI OFFENSE SCENE.  LOVETT WITH  HIS TDPS DUI/POM  REVENUE FRAUD  CRONIES  BY SAID UNUSUAL PROCEDURE  IS A COVER UP TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE FOR THIS 15 YEAR OLD GIRL STRUCK BY LOVETT DUI AND PERSERVE LOVETT AS A SJCC  JUDGE CRONY IN  TDPSCD/P REVENEU FRAUD.  IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION.

 

PROVIDENTIALLY ON MAY 9, APPELLANT FALSELY JAILED BY LOVETT’S APRIL 6TH FRAUDULENT PROBATION ORDER FOR 60 DAYS, MONDAYS TO FRIDAYS, WEEKENDS OFF, (AN UNHEARD OF PROBATION JAILING ARRANGEMENT) SPOKE WITH THE WRECKER IMPRISONED IN SJC JAIL FOR AN UNPAID TICKET WHO TRANSPORTED LOVETT’S BADLY DAMAGED TRUCK FROM THE DUI ACCIDENT SCENE. SAID WRECKER REPORTED, LOVETT, “WHO IS DRUNK ALL THE TIME IN COURT AS WELL AS OUT” HAD THE COLLISION BECAUSE HE WAS DRUNK.  WRECKER SAID HE WROTE AT THAT TIME BY LAW  THE COLLISION WAS DUI  IN HIS WRECKER LOG BECAUSE IT IS REQUIRED INFORMATION BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES.

JOHN LOVETT IS ON PUBLIC CRIMINAL RECORD IN ANOTHER COUNTY AS HAVING ONE CLASS A +.15 DUI MISDEMEANOR, THAT THE APPELLANT HAS KNOWLEDGE OFF.  THIS MAY HAVE INFLUENCED THE TDPSHPO’S UNUSUAL PROCEDURE TO KEEP LOVETT FROM JAIL TIME AND OR ELECTION BY REMOVED AS SJCC JUDGE.

 

 

THE NEWSPAPER ACCOUNT CONCLUDES, “DPS IS WAITING ON PENDING TOXICOLOGY RESULTS TO COMPLETE REPORTS.”  THIS AGAIN IS VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION,  AS STATED SAID REPORT, PRO FORMA, IS TO HAVE BEEN DONE BY NOW, AND THERE HAS BEEN NO PUBLIC MENTION BY LOVETT OR DPS OF THE RESULT’S OR PUBLISHING OF THE COMPLETED REPORT PUBLICLY BY TDPS AS BOTH PROMISED.  THE REPORT WILL NOT BE MADE PUBLIC UNLESS BY SUB PEONA OF THE PERSONAL INJURY LAWYER OF THE FIFTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL WHO ESCAPED MASSIVE INJURY AND POSSIBLY DEATH BY DRUNKEN DRIVER, EVEN THEN THERE COULD BE A NON DISCLOSURE SETTLEMENT OUT OF COURT. NONETHELESS, THE TIME PERIOD  FOR THE RESULTS OF THE FRAUDULENT EXONERATING BAC TEST HAVE COME AND GONE WITHOUT LOVETT OR DPS MAKING THE MANUFACTURED RESULTS PUBLIC OR EVEN COMPLETING PUBLICLY SAID REPORT.

 

  TDPS COVER UP TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN LOVETT’S  NON DUI CASE,  IS THE UPSIDE DOWN BACKWARDS MIRROR IMAGE OF THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE NO. 2016-215- SJC COURT MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME BY LOVETT AND HIS  TDPSHPO ACCOMPLICES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

UPDATE: IT HAS BEEN OVER  THREE MONTHS AND THERE HAS BEEN NO PUBLIC RECORD RELEASED OF JUDGE LOVETT’S  VOLUNTARY BAC  FROM THE TDPSFC LAB .  HOWEVER, THE YOUNG GIRLS LAWYER- LOVETT NO INSURANCE- BY RIGHT OF DISCOVERY HAVE  RIGHT TO SEE LOVETT’S BAC REPORT AND BY THE MICHAEL MORTON LAW AGAINST THE POLICY OF THE TDPS, HAVE THE TECH WHO DID IT RE DO IT FOR SUSPICION OF FOUL PLAY IF IT IS REPORTED AT OO.OO SINCE LOVETT WAS REPORTED AT THE SCENE BY TWO WITNESSES AS DUI DRIVING RECKLESSLY CAUSING THE CRASH.

 

 UPDATE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT JOHN LOVETT COULD BE DELUSIONAL DUE TO THE EFFECTS OF CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM IMPACTING LOVETT’S MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE PERPETRATION OF AN ANTI -CATHOLIC HATE CRIME AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD. 

 

EASTEX ADVOCATE, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 21, 2017- COUNTY JUDGE SUING COMMISSIONERS: JUDGE ALLEGES ARSON (EXHIBIT 9)

 

THIS NEWS STORY REPORTS  BEHAVIOR OF JOHN LOVETT, PARANOID AND DELUSIONAL, CONCERNED SOLELY WITH HIMSELF AS JUDGE.  WAS THIS ARSON?    CUI BONO?  LOVETT, STILL WITHOUT CAR INSURANCE, NOT CHARGED BY TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  CRONY TDPSHPO  ON MAY 1ST, 2017 AND JAILED FOR DUI II, BAC + .15  A STATE FELONY PUNISHABLE BY ONE YEAR IN PRISON AND SUSPENCION OF LICENSE, IS LIABLE CIVILLY  WITH ONLY A MONETARY SETTLEMENT IN  A CIVIL SUIT FROM THE MAY 1ST ACCIDENT. (THERE HAS BEEN NO TDPSFCL REPORT MADE PUBLIC BY LOVETT OR ANYONE,   NOT SURPRISINGLY, OR INDICTMENT FOR DUI OR DRIVING WITH OUT INSURANCE.

 

PREDOMINATELY ARSON, AS IN MAFIA INSURANCE BURN OUT,  IS PREMISED UPON COLLECTING INSURANCE.  SEEMINGLY DELUSIONAL AND PARANOID, LOVETT, STATES THOUGH PROBABLY  NOT THE COMMISSIONERS,  ONE OF HIS POLITICAL ENEMIES AGAINST HIS  RE ELECTION AS SJCC JUDGE, IS  DEFINITELY THE ARSON. LOVETT STATES FURTHER THIS ACT OF ARSON IS THE RESULT OF THE POLITICAL ATMOSPHERE OF HOSTILITY CREATED BY TRUMP’S ELECTION AND DRAINING THE SWAMP. LOVETT SAID HE DOES NOT WANT TO DRAIN THE SWAMP. THIS NEWS REPORT IS INDICATIVE OF LOVETT’S  SEEMINGLY DELUSIONAL AND  PARANOID THINKING AND  BEHAVIOR ARISING FROM CHRONIC ALCOHOL ABUSE. THE APPELLANT AS DEFENDANT IN SJCC EXPERIENCED DELUSIONAL AND PARANOID BEHAVIOR BY LOVETT  AS ANTI CATHOLIC BIGOTRY BELLIGERENCE   MANIFESTED  BY LOVETT POSSIBLY DUE TO CHRONIC ALCOHOL ABUSE AND PERPETUAL DRUNKENESS IN SJCC HEARINGS  IN ALL OF LOVETT’S  BEHAVIOR IN FRAUDULENTLY AND MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTING THE APPELLANT PRO SE IN CAUSE NO. 2016-215- IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

FOR  VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT,  ALL DEFENDANTS BEFORE JOHN LOVETT IN SJCC ARE EXONERATED OF ALL CHARGES DUE TO LOVETT’S  JUDICIAL MENTAL AND EMOTIONAL  INCOMPETENCY DUE TO THE PARANOID AND DELUSIONAL EFFECTS OF CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM.

 

 

 

 

 RES IPSO, IGITUR,  AS  SAID EXEMPLAR CASE IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT,  APPELLANT  HAS PLAINTIFF STANDING TO REPRESENT  IN SAID CLASS ACTION ANY ONE IN TEXAS FREELY CHOOSING TO ENJOIN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT FALSELY  CONVICTED VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S  DUI/POM SCAM.

 

 MOREOVER, ALL IN TEXAS  ARRESTED BY THE TDPS FOR SUSPECTED  DUI ARE DENIED THE SAME BAC/DUI  “UNUSUAL PROCEDURE” AFFORDED TO SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVETT ON MAY 1ST, A VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECT CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION BY THE TDPSHP AND TDPS IN  EVERY OTHER DUI PROSECUTION CASE  IN TEXAS.

 

LOVETT,  SUBJECT TO DELUSIONAL AND PARANOID JUDGEMENT AND ACTIONS DUE TO CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM, HAS DENIED, AS SUCH, HUNDREDS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS IN SJC THEIR VITH AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS BY THAT VERY FACT ALONE. THE MAY 19TH  MOCK COURT ORDER IS CULPABLE OF ALLOWING  LOVETT AND HIS ACCOMPLICES, THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, ET AL.  TO CONTINUE DUI/POM  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION NOT ONLY AGAINST THE APPELLANT BUT AGAINST ALL IN TEXAS IN PRINCIPLE OF FACT AND POTENTIALLY IN ACTION.

 

PERPETRATING WIRE FRAUD, ALLEGEDLY DRUNKEN AND APPARENTLY LASCIVIOUS SJCC JUDGE JOHN LOVET REGULARLY ORDERS DISMISSAL OF CHARGES AFTER  MOTION TO DISMISS BY   ASS. DA MARK BOEMIO’S EXCLUSIVELY  FOR SCANTILY CLAD YOUNG WOMEN AND GIRLS ALONE IN ALL CASES AT ARRAIGNMERNT  HEARING.   THE APPELLANT OBSERVED SAID ARRAIGNMENT HEARINGS LOVETT PRESIDING THUS EACH TIME. THIS CORRUPT JUDICIAL EXERCISE BY LOVETT IS MORE EVIDENCE OF LOVETT’S SEEMINGLY DELUSIONAL- GRANDIOSE, I  MAKE THE LAW AS JUDGE DELUSIONAL, PARANOID, AND CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR DUE TO CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM. ONCE AGAIN IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE IN THE CASES OF ALL WHO PLEA BEFORE LOVETT AS SJCC JUDGE WHOSE CASE IS NOT DISMISSED BY LOVETT FOR NOT BEING SCANTILY CLAD AS A WOMAN OR GIRL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE USE OF TDPSCF LAB  BAC TEST REPORTS THAT ARE IN ALL DUI CASES IN TEXAS  DENIED RETESTING IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, BY SAID SAME LAB AND BAC TECHNICIAN UNDERSIGNING SAID TDPSFC LAB TEST BAC REPORT FOR SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY DISPUTED IS IN ALL CASES OF DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS BASED ON SAID TDPSFC LAB BAC TEST REPORT  IN VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, GIVES PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT TO ANY ONE IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI BY MANUFACTURED TDPSFC LAB BAC REPORTS  AND SUPPRESSED POTENTIALLY OXONERATING BAC BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE  IN  PERPETRATION OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

 ON JANUARY 9TH, 2016,  SJCC CAUSE NO: 2016 -215-ASS. DA. CHRISTINA WOODS IN DISCOVERY COURT IMMEDIATELY MOVED TO GO DIRECTLY TO TRIAL STATING THE PROSECUTION WITH SAID .231 BAC EVIDENCE ADMISSIBLE WITHOUT RETESTING ORDERED BY LOVETT ( I.E.MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION)  HAD ALL THE STATE REQUIRES TO CONVICT THE APPELLANT OF ENHANCED+.15 CLASS A MISDEMEANOR DUI AND MADE MOTION TO SET A DATE FOR TRIAL.  DENYING, THEREBY, THE  APPELLANT  DUE PROCESS OF A PRE-TRIAL HEARING, THIS THE SJCC ASS. DA  JUSTIFIED BY THE DENIAL OF THE APPELLANT’S  MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS IN THE INTEREST OF CONVICTION ALONE AND NOT JUSTICE,  TO RETEST DNA/BAC EVIDENCE.

 

 

ASS DA WOODS STATEMENT AND MOTION TO GO TO TRIAL SUSTAINED OVER THE OBJECTION OF THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE, THE APPELLANT, CAUSED THE APPELLANT, TO REALIZE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT  A FAIR TRIAL BY JURY WITH SAID MANUFACTURED BAC EVIDENCE ALLOWED BY LOVETT,  PROSECUTED BY AN  UNSCRUPULOUS  SJCC ASS. DA CHRISTINA WOOD AND ACCOMPLICE LIAR MARK BOEMIO, PRESIDED OVER BY ANTI CATHOLIC FREE MASONIC BELLIGERENT DRUNK JUDGE, JOHN LOVETT,  WAS THEREFORE NOT POSSIBLE AND IPSO RES IGITUR, A VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

 

 RES IPS, IGITUR APPELLANT MADE MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION/RECUSAL OF A JUDGE ON FEBR. 23, 2017 BEFORE HIS COMPLETELY UNEXPECTED AND UN PLANNED FOR MOCK TRIAL THAT SAID DAY, LOVETT DISAVOWING SAID MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION AND RECUSA IN RESPONSE.  SAID MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION/RECUSAL OF A JUDGE DEMANDS DUE DILIGENCE, AND PROCESS, AND PEER ADJUDICATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST OF A JUDGE TO BE GRANTED OR DENIED. UNTIL JUSTLY RESOLVED BY DUE PROCESS SATISFYING BOTH JUDGE AND MOTION PLAINTIFF,  FOR OR AGAINST DISQUALIFICATION, ANY RULINGS FROM THE SJCC BENCH IS PRECLUDED IN SAID CAUSE OF JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST UNTIL A JUST RESOLUTION OF SAID MOTION TO PROCEED HENCE FORTH..  JOHN LOVETT, INFORMED IN SAID MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION HE HAD NO CONSTITUIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING TO TRY SAID CAUSE FOR ALL SAID REASONS IN THIS APPEAL,  AS SJCC JUDGE, AND A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST HAVING DENIED APPELLANT HIS MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS DISAVOWED AND DISMISSED OUT OF HAND NEVERTHELESS, SAID MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT. 

 

 

LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, DISAVOWING  OUT OF HAND  SAID MOTION TO DISQUALIFY VIOLATED DUE PROCESS AND THE VITH AMENDMENT. AFTER THE FACT, THE APPELLANT WAS THAT SAME DAY  2/23/17 UNDERESTIMATING LOVETT’S UNSCRUPULOUS AUDACITY IN A PARANOID AND DELUSIONAL PURSUANT OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME VIA SAID MALICIOUS PROSECUTION,  WITHOUT APPELLANT’S  FOREKNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT, TRIED AND CONVICTED IN ABSENTIA  THEREBY IN SJCC  LOVETT WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING AND THROUGH PERJURY AND MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE BY AUBEL, SLAUGHTER, CORLEY  LYING UNDER OATH HOODWINKING  THE JURY ORCHESTRATED BY ASS. DA CHRISTIANA WOOD AND MARK BOEMIO,  FALSELY CONVICTED OF 1ST DUI ENHANCED CAM +.15 SJCC CAUSE NO 2016-215- THE FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT ELEMENT OF SAID 2016 DUI EXTRADITION WARRANT LEADING TO THE APPELLANT’S MARCH 13, 2017 FALSE ARREST AND JAILING IN MCJ DERIVES FROM APPELLANT’S  IN ABSENTIA CONVICTION, IN VOLO CONTENDERE A MISTRIAL 2/23/17.

 

BY SAID FALSE CONVICTION  OF THE APPELLANT IN ABSENTIA, VOLO CONTENDERE A MISTRIAL, JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES CONVICTED THEMSELVES BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME AGAINST THE APPELLANT. THEY FALSELY CONVICTED THE DEFENDANT PRO SE 2/23/17 IN SJCC WITH TDPSCF LAB .231 BAC REPORT MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE  AND SUPPRESSED PIRATED POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BLOOD  SAMPLE EVIDENCE IN VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW, THEY FALSELY CONVICTED THE APPELLANT THAT DAY  BY MUCH PERJURY AND COPIOUS VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 MANIFEST IN NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE SITES AND DATES,  AND  IN CONTINUOUS FALSE TESTIMONY BY  LYING ARGUMENTS AND BASELESS CHARGES, A MISTRIAL, VOLO CONTENDERE,  NULL AND VOID  OF THE APPELLANT UNJUSTLY TRIED IN ABSENTIA BY AN IPSO FACTO DISQUALIFIED JUDGE,  DRUNK, DELUSIONAL, AND A BELLIGERENT ANTI CATHOLIC BIGOT AND UNJUSTLY SENTENCED IN ABSENTIA  AND JAILED FOR 365 DAYS WITH NO POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION IN THE COMMISSION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.

 

 ON MARCH  19TH, THEREAFTER, THE APPELLANT WAS EXTRADITED FROM MCJ  TO SJCJ  BY SAID DUI 2016/FAILURE TO APPEAR EXTRADITION WARRANT BY LOVETT AND TOLD BY THE OFFICER OF THE SJCC  COMMISSIONED BY LOVETT THE APPELLANT WOULD SERVE 365 DAYS CONTINUOUSLY WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION. THE APPELLANT AT THAT MOMENT LOCKED IN A CELL WAS CONVINCED AT THAT TIME HE WOULD SERVE 365 DAYS SENTENCED BY LOVETT IN ABSENTIA CONTINUOUSLY WITH NO PROBATION. THIS IS CRUEL PUNISHMENT AND MENTAL ANGUISH AND TORTURE.

 

THE APPELLANT  DE FACTO SERVED 33 DAYS OF AB INITO  365 DAY SENTENCE  GIVEN PROBATION BY SAID APRIL 6TH  COVER UP RUSE COMPLETELY SPURIOUS IN EVERY FACT AND DETAIL  PROBATION ORDER BY JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL APRIL 6TH, 2017-(EXHIBIT).  EVERY DETAIL OF FACT IS FALLACIOUS ON SAID APRIL 6TH, 2017 PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT. EVERY SINGLE DETAIL.  SAID APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER BY LOVETT WAS A CYNICAL  RUSE BY LOVETT AND HIS SJCC ACCOMPLICES   TO COVER UP OR OVER THE APRIL 4TH  2016/DECEMBER 24TH 2015  DUI FALSE CONVICTION ON 2/23/2017 CAUSE NUMBER 2016 215- BY WHICH LOVETT AND SJCC ACCOMPLICES IN CONVICTING THE APPELLANT IN A PUBLIC TRIAL CONVICTED THEMSELVES.  SAID COVER UP APRIL 6TH PROBATION RUSE WAS TO COVER UP AND OVER THEIR 2/23/17 PUBLIC CONVICTION OF MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTING THE APPELLANT IN AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.

 

APPELLANT WAS RELEASED UNEXPECTEDLY FROM SJC JAIL ON WEDNESDAY,  MAY 6, 2017 HAVING BEEN DEPRIVED OF HIS LEGAL DEFENSE  PAPERS AT PROCESSING (JUST AS AT MC JAIL PROCESSING A WEEK LATER)   MONDAY MORNING  MAY 4TH AT  SJCJ  WHERE SAID APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER, A COVER UP OF 2/23/17 ACCOUNTED  TIME SERVED FROM MONDAY 8:00 A.M. TO FRIDAY 5.PM WITH WEEKENDS OFF. SAID ALIENATED LEGAL DOCUMENTS PAPERS WERE RETURNED TO APPELLANT UNDER FALSE JAILING AT SJCJ JUST BEFORE HIS UNEXPECTED EARLY RELEASE THAT WEDNESDAY.  A JAILER WITHOUT WRITTEN ORDER OR COMMENT EXCEPT- “THE SJC JAIL HAS NO RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU” RELEASED APPELLANT WITH SAID SJCC PROBATION AND COURT DOCUMENTS IN HAND.   SJC SHERIFF GREG CAPPERS, OR A SUBORDINATE AT SJC JAIL, IT CAN ONLY BE SPECULATED, REALIZED THEIR LIABILITY IN THE SJC JAIL MISUSED BY THE CONTINUING UNLAWFULNESS OF APPELLANT’S JAILING  BY LOVETT’S COVER UP APRIL 6TH ORDER OF PROBATION AND RELEASED THE APPELLANT.

 

 

 

 

 

 FREEING THE APPELLANT FROM FALSE JAILING, AS IS THE CASE WITH THE RUSE MAY 19 MCC AT LAW FIVE COURT ORDER, WAS NOT TRULY DONE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE.  THIS WAS DONE TO EXTRICATE THE SJC JAIL AND DEPUTIES FROM LIABILITY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SUIT FOR UNLAWFUL PARTICIPATION  IN  THE ILLEGAL JAILING OF AN INNOCENT PRIEST IN THE SJC JAIL PURSUANT OF LOVETT’S ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.

 

THIS GESTURE OF SELF INTEREST AND DEFENSE BY THE SJCJ AUTHORITIES , LIKE THE MCC AT LAW FIVE MAY 19TH MOTION TO DISMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, DID NOT ACHIEVE EQUITABLE REDRESS AND RELIEF IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE IN ANY ACTUAL WAY IN THAT, JUST AS THE MAY 19TH DISMISSAL ORDER,  LOVETT WAS NEVER PERSONALLY CONFRONTED AND PUBLICLY EXPOSED AND CHARGED  BY SJC JAIL AUTHORITIES, NOR CRIMINALLY INDICTED BY CAPPERS FOR  MISUSING THE SJC SHERIFF DEPARTMENT AND SJC JAIL PURSUANT OF  AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, LOVETT WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING AS A SJCC JUDGE AB INITIO.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, AS A RESULT THE APPELLANT WAS FALSELY ARRESTED BY MC SHERIFF DEPUTIES A WEEK AFTER HIS UNEXPECTED RELEASE FROM SJC JAIL  IN WILLIS ON MAY 13TH, 2015 AND AGAIN FALSELY JAIL IN MC JAIL FOR A SECOND TIME (THE FIRST BEING MARCH 13TH, 2017) FOR VIOLATION OF A SECOND STRATEGICALLLY ALTERED  RUSE DEFERRED ADJUDICATION  PROBATION  IN TANDEM WITH A 2/23/ 17 DUI CONVICTION SANCTION OF SUSPENDED LICENSE, I.E. DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID. MUTUALLY EXONERATING CHARGES AS SAID. THIS DEFFERED ADJUDICATION PROBATION CONTRADICTED AND COVERED UP BOTH THE 2/23/17 FALSE DUI CONVICTION OF THE APPELLANT, AND THE FALLACIOUS APRIL 6TH, 2016 PROBATION AND SENTENCING ORDER BY LOVETT UNOFFICALLY ABROGATED BY THE RELEASE OF THE APPELLANT FROM THE SJC JAIL THE WEEK BEFORE.

 

 LOVETT STRATEGICLY  ALTERED  THE FIRST APRIL 6TH  PROBATION COVER UP RUSE TO  A SECOND DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION COVER UP RUSE  WHICH  ENTAILS NO PREVIOUS CONVICTION  FOR DUI 2/23/17.  THE MAY 19TH ORDER, WHICH DELETED AND THEREBY SURPRESSED  SAID AB INITIO  ENHANCING ARREST CHARGE  OF VIOLATION WHILE DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID OF LOVETT’S  ALTERED DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION RUSE COVERING OVER  THE 2/23/17 DUI CONVICTION, FROM THE COURT PUBLIC HEARING, RECORD AND ORDER TO DIMISS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, THEREBY DID NOT CONFRONT IN A COURT OF LAW LOVETT FOR SAID FELONIOUS RUSE SUBJECTING AS EXHIBITS CORROBORATE THE APPELLANT TO CONTINUED MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, BY DELICT WARRANT AND COURT ORDER ENDING IN FALSE ARREST AND UNJUST JAILING.

 

 

RES IPSO,  IGITUR,THOUGH RELEASED FOR A MOMENT FROM FALSE IMPRISONMENT IN MC JAIL BY RUSE MAY 19TH COURT ORDER IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, , JUST AS THE APPELLANT WAS A WEEK BEFORE HIS ARREST WAS RELEASED FOR A MOMENT FROM SJC JAIL BY SJCD AUTHORITIES ABROGATING PRIVATELY LOVETT’S APRIL 6TH FIRST PROBATION ORDER, LOVETT’S SECOND CONTRADICTORY DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDER, NOT PUBLICLY REFUTED IN A COURT OF LAW DUE TO SUPPRESSION FROM PUBLIC HEARING, LIKE LOVETT’S FIRST APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES THEREBY HAS DENIED THE APPELANT ALL JUSTICE IN HIS CAUSE  AND NO EQUITABLE RELIEF GIVEN TO THE APPELLANT BY A COURT OF LAW WITH CONSTITUTIONAL STATE/DISTRICT STANDING IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT, SAID SECOND COVER UP RUSE BY LOVETT EXISTING IN NOMINE SOLO, I.E. IN NAME ONLY, CONTINUES ON THE BOOKS, SO TO SPEAK, SPECIOUSLY   AS  DEFERRED  ADJUDICATION PROBATION DUE TO ITS SUPPRESSION FROM PUBLIC HEARING BY SAID MAY 19TH RUSE MOTION AND COURT ORDER. SAID MAY 19TH RUSE THEREBY FURTHER ABETS  LOVETT’S AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSOCIATES DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION RUSE TO  COVER OVER THE FALSE 2/23/17 2016/2015  DUI CONVICTION RE CAUSE NUMBER 2016-2015- SAN JACINTO COUNTY COURT, JOHN LOVETT, PERSONA SOL, PRESIDING AS SJCC JUDGE WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING WHERE BY IN FALSELY CONVICTION AND MALICIOUSLY JAILING THE APPELLANT IN COMMISION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME, LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES CONVICTED THEMSELVES. 

 

IN  MALFEASANCE ,  FAILURE TO DO SWORN DUTY, THE SJC SHERIFF DEPARTMENT  BECAUSE OF CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST BEING THEMSELVES IMPLICATED AS ACCOMPLICES AFTER THE FACT IN LOVETT’S HATE CRIME VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND THEREBY PERSONALLY LIABLE IN SUIT,  IN TANDEM WITH THE SJCC, REFUSED TO CONFRONT, AND TO INDICT AND TO ARREST LOVETT AND HIS ACCOMPLICES LEADING TO THE APPELLANT’S  FALSE ARREST ON MAY 13TH BY MC SHERIFF DEPUTIES FOR DRIVING WITH AN INVALID LICENSE ENHANCED BY VIOLATION OF SAID RUSE COVER UP  NON EXISTENT IN NAME ONLY DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION ORDERED BY LOVETT, AS PREVIOUSLY STATED.

 

 

IN TURN AND LIKEWISE, SAID MAY 19TH, 2017  RUSE MOTION TO DISMISS  IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND SUBSEQUENT MC COURT ORDER DID NOT CONFRONT IN A COURT OF LAW,  NOR INDICT JOHN LOVETT’S FELONIOUS MASQUERADING AS A SJC JUDGE, WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING, IN ISSUING SAID 2016 DUI/FAILURE TO APPEAR WARRANT,  NOR PUBLICLY AND IN COURT RECORD GIVE HEARING TO AND THEREBY EXPOSE LOVETT’S SPECIOUS  IN NOMINE SOLO, NULL AND VOID, DEFERRED ADJUDICATION  PROBATION  COVER UP RUSE  IN A  MC COURT OF LAW THEREBY DENYING THE APPELLANT IN RELEASING HIM MOMENTARILY FROM FALSE IMPRISONMENT LASTING RELIEF THERE FROM AND EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR.  APPELLANT CONTINUES TO BE SUBJECT TO WARRANTS PAST AND PRESENT ORDERED  BY THE DELUSIONAL AND  DRUNKEN, BELLIGERENT ANTI CATHOLIC FREE MASON  JOHN LOVETT DERIVING FROM  FIRST APRIL 6TH PROBATION ORDER MANDATING  HIS ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT HIM FOR 365 DAYSA RUSE TO COVER OVER FEB. 23RD 2017 CONVICTION WITH APRIL 6 PROBATION ORDER DATE OF  “DEC 24TH, 2015” DUI, AND UNLAWFUL MALICIOUS  SENTENCING IN ABSENTIA BY LOVETT PURSUANT OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.  APPELLANT WAS SENTENCED IN ABSENTIA BY LOVETT PERSONA SOL TO TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT- 365 DAYS- FOR 1ST DUI +.15 BAC ENHANCED TO CAM ORDERED BY LOVETT ON APRIL 6TH, 2017.  LOVETT’S  FIRST COVER UP RUSE APRIL 6TH, 2017 PROBATION ORDER CITES FALLACIOUSLY THE INITIAL DUI OFFENSE DATE ON LOVETT’S PROBATION ORDER AS DEC. 24TH, 2015- NOT THE INSTANTER APRIL 4, 2016 DATE, MOCKING THE APPELLANT FROM THE BENCH, A CATHOLIC PRIEST, AS  DRUNK AT ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT ON CHRISTMAS EVE- PURSUANT OF LOVETT’S COMMISSION OF AN ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME. RES IPSO IGITUR, APPELLANT MAKES SAID MOTION OF COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION FROM JOHN LOVETT AND HIS CRIMINAL ASSOCIATES.

 

 

WITHOUT PRAYED FOR COURT ORDER OF PROTECTION, THE APPELLANT IS THREATENED WITH MULTIPLE WARRANTS ISSUED BY THE SJC PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR FAILURE TO PAY DELINQUENT $100.00 OF  $600 REMAINING FOR PROBATION FEES DERIVING FROM THIS SECOND SPECIOUS  DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION RUSE COVER UP AUTHORED BY LOVETT WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING AS PERSONA SOL. (EXHIBIT ) APPELLANT’S ARREST AGAIN FOR SAID DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION VIOLATION WILL RETURN HIM WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF BAIL TO SERVE THE REMAINING  365 DAY SENTENCE IN SJCJ ORDER BY LOVETT ON APRIL 6TH, 2017.

 

 

RES IPSO SEQUITUR, APPELLANT PRO SE PRAYS THE HONORABLE JUDGE BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS FOR EQUITABLE REDRESS AND RELIEF TO GRANT APPELLANTS MOTION OF COURT ORDERED PROTECTION OF APPELLANT FROM CONTINUED FALSE ARREST AND FALSE JAILING UNLAWFULLY WARRANTED BY JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES PURSUANT OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.

 

 

RES IPSO SEQUITOR, APPELLANT PRO SE PRAYS HONORABLE JUDGE TO GRANT IN APPEAL PER COURT ORDER OF MANDAMUS   SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  ALL CHARGES, CONVICTIONS, SENTENCING, AND FINES, PROBATIONS AND EXPUNGMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORD IN CAUSE IN CASE NO. 17-322548 MCC LAW 5, MAY 19TH, 2017 LIGAMENTUM CUM – AN ESTOPPEL OF CAUSE NUMBER 2016-215- .

 

 

SAID  MOTION SOL IS THE ONLY SUMMARY JUDGEMENT RATIFIED BY THE APPELLANT PRO SE. SAID MOTION ALONE IS TRULY JUSTICE AND ACHIEVES EQUITABLE REDRESS AND REAL RELIEF FROM CONTINUED ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME HARASSMENT BY LOVETT BY MALICIOUS WARRANT AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE PROBATION ORDER RUSES.

 

 SAID MOTION DEMANDS EQUITABLE REDRESS OF COMPENSATION FOR TIME OF UNLAWFUL ARREST AND FALSE JAILING, AS JUDGEMENT ONE. AND JUDGEMENT TWO, REMEDY FOR ALL SAID DISTRESS AND GRIEVANCES DERIVING THERE FROM IN ANY MANNER  ENCOMPASSING LOSS OF EMPLOYMENT DUE TO UNJUST ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT AND UNLAWFUL CONFISCATION OF DRIVER’S LICENSE AND IDENTIFICATION, ET ALL SAID HERE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE COURT’S SWORN CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY IS TO UPHOLD THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS AND TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION AGAINST DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. JOHN LOVETT AND ALL ACCOMPLICES IN THE TDPSCD/P REVNUE FRAUD ARE DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE CONSTITUTION  IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S AND ALL IN TEXAS’ CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW PURSUANT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THEIR  DUI/POM VICIOUS REVENUE FRAUD  PIRATING IN SJC AND THROUGHOUT  TEXAS.

 

FOR JUSTICE, REPRESENTS ALL TEXANS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT, WHO HAVE HAD, AS THE APPELLANT CONTINUOUSLY HAS HAD,  GOD GIVEN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATED UNDER COLOR OF LAW, THEIR IVTH. VTH, VITH, VIIITH, XVIIITH, XXIITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS VIOLATED BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN PERPETRATION OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD VIA DUI FALSE CONVICTION AND UNLAWFUL CONFISCATION AND SUSPENSION  OF THEIR NON COMMERICIAL DRIVERS’ LICENSE DERIVING FROM UNLAWFUL APPLICATION OF THE 2003 DRIVERS RESPONSIBILTY LAW.

 

APPELLANT, IN HIS EXEMPLAR CASE, HAS SHOWN EVIDENCE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT  IN CONVICTING FALSELY THE APPELANT, LOVETT AND ALL ACCOMPLICES TRULY CONVICTED THEMSELVES IN THEIR OWN COURT OF LAW BY THEIR OWN FALSE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY OF ALL THEIR SAID CRIMES, AND IN TANDEM CONVICTED THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS  OF THEIR DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD

 

  MAKES  CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JOHN LOVETT AND ALL SAID  ACCOMPLICES, AND PRAY THE COURT ISSUE SAID WARRANT FOR LOVETT’S ARREST AND SAID ACCOMPLICES FOR SAID FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS AS THE COURT SEES FIT IN DOING THE COURT’S DUTY TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION AGAINST DOMESTIC ENEMIES. THE APPELLANT ALSO CLAIMS EXEMPLAR CAUSE STANDING AS A PLAINTIFF IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT. 

 

 NON EXISTENT OFFENSE SITES TO FEIGN JUDICIAL STANDING AND CRIMINAL JURISDICTION  AND FALLACIOUS DATES OF OFFENSES ON GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS IN VIOLATION OF FAA 1001 AS A PERVASIVE RUSE IN SJC AND PERHAPS IN OTHER COUNTIES ACROSS TEXAS IS A CRIMINAL ELEMENT IN PERPETRATING THE TDPS COMMISSIONER  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  AND CAN BE ASCERTAINED AS PROSECUTING EVIDENCE   BY   FEDERAL AND OR STATE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION SUB PEONA  COUNTY TDPSHPO  DUI/POM OFFENSE REPORTS.  APPELLANT CALLS FOR THE STATE GRAND JURY TO INVESTIGATE AND TO INDICT IN THESE CRIMINAL MATTERS IF THEIR IS PROBABLY CAUSE OF GUILT.

 

TEXAS DUI/POM CRIMINAL CODE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND MUST BE AMENDED.

 

THE VEILING OF KNOWLEDGE OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS  TO INSURE LEGALLY VINCIBLE IGNORANCE IN PERPETRATING TDPS THE COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD,  100% OF DUI REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS ARE NOT READ THEIR MARANDA RIGHTS IN THE STATE OF TEXAS.  POLICE VEILING AT ARREST THE KNOWLEDGE OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS  ENFORCES FEAR AND BLIND SUBMISSION TO ARREST AND PROSECUTION THROUGH VINCIBLE IGNORANCE SANCTIONED BY THE DUI SCAM  BY AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DUI PROSECUTION TEXAS STATE CODE. NOT KNOWING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS,  DUI ARREST IS THE ONLY CLASS A/B MISDEMEANOR IN WHICH THE SUSPECT, INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY, IS NOT READ HIS MIRANDA RIGHTS AT THE MOMENT OF ARREST.  IGNORANCE, FEAR, SUBMISSION RESULT TO PERPETUATE PASSIVELY THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.   UNCONSTITUTIONAL TEXAS DUI/POM CODE MUST BE MADE CONSTITUTIONAL BY THE READING OF MARANDA RIGHTS  AT TIME OF ARREST FOR DUI/POM.

 

 

 iPSO RES, iGITUR, NOT BEING READ AND  VINCIBLE IGNORANT OF  MARANDA  RIGHTS-,  WITH NO PHYSICAL BAC EVIDENCE, JAILED  SOLELY BY DUI  INSTANTER ARRESTING OFFICER’S SWORN OFFENSE REPORT WHO DID NOT PERSONALLY WITNESS THE SUSPECT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL AT ANY TIME BEFORE OR AFTER HIS ARREST,  (AS IS THE APPELLANT’S CASE ) OF DUI +.08 , SWORN IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 IN 100% OF SAID REPORTS SWORN BY THE INSTANTER TDPS DUI ARREST TROOPER IN THE OF DUI +.08 , SWORN IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 IN 100% OF SAID REPORTS, SWORN IN VIOLATION BY THE DUI ARRESTING OFFICER  DUE TO  A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO PERPETUATE  TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM. REVENUE FRAUD.  MOREOVER,  IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, THE DUI INSTANTER OFFICER DID NOT BEFORE OR AFTER PERSONALLY WITNESS THE APPELLANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL OF HIS VEHICLE BEFORE OR AFTER HIS ARREST.  MANUFACTURED BAC TEST IN UNCONSTITUTIONAL TEXAS  DUI MALICIOUS  PROSECUTION ILLEGALLY AND UNCONSTITUTIONALLY  REPLACES  AND SUPPLANTS THIS  FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENT OF WITNESSES OF THE DEFENDANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL IN  DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE TDPSCD/PRF.  

 

 

IPSO RES. IGITUR ,  ALL DUI SUSPECTS-INOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY- , WITH NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE BAC OR OTHER,   IGNORANT OF THEIR IV, V, VI, WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, RIGHTS,  SOLEY ON THE TESTIMONY OF THE INSTANTER OFFICER WHO DID NOT IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE PERSONALLY WITNESS THE APPELLANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL AT ANY TIME BEFORE OR AFTER THE APPELLANT’S  DUI ARREST  ARE JAILED FOR THREE DAYS OR MORE (THE APPELLANT WAS  MALICIOUSLY IN UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT JAILED IN SJC JAIL FOR FOUR DAYS IN SOLITARY CONFINEMENT FOR FOR VOICING HIS OBJECTIONS TO THE VIOLATION OF HIS CIVIL AND GENEVA RIGHTS AND BAC REFUSAL DURING WHICH TIME HIS SISTER DIED WITH CANCER AND HIS RESCUE DOGS WERE SHOT BY A MALICIOUS NEIGHBOR FOR TRESS PASSING).

 

 

FOR APPROXIMATELY 30 DAYS BEFORE BEING CHARGED, ON BAIL, THERE IS NO PUBLIC RECORD ACCESSIBLE TO THE DUI DEFENDANT OF BAC THE NIGHT OF ARREST AND JAILING FOR DUI.  EVERY BAC NEVER DOES, BUT WHAT IF THE BAC CAME BACK BELOW .O8  THE DEFENDANT’S TDPS  BAC REPORT IS SENT TO THE STATE PROSECUTION’S LOCAL DA OFFICE EXCLUSIVELY AND ONLY CAN ONLY BE ASCERTAINED BEFORE TRIAL BY  DISCOVERY IN VIOLATION OF THE VITH AMENDMENT, THE EXONERATING -.O8 BAC REPORT IS WITH HELD BY THE STATE PROSECUTION AFTER JAILING AND ON BAIL FOR APPROXIMATELY THIRTY DAYS MAKING BAIL EXCESSIVE IN VIOLATION OF THE VII AMENDMENT.    TO PERPETUATE THE TDPSCD/PRF  100% TDPS  DUI INSTANTERS ARE RETROACTIVELY JUSTIFIED BY  MANUFACTURED  + .08 BAC  TDPSCF LAB REPORTS WITH NO REFUSAL IN 100% OF DUI ARRESTS AND JAILING.  

 

 

TEXAS ASS. DA BRANDISH LIKE CLUBS SAID MANUFACTURED BAC REPORTS TO THREATEN AND  TO BULLY  TDPSC DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS  WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF LEGAL COUNSEL  PRESENT TO PLEA GUILTY FOR A LITE SENTENCE,  SAID MANUFACTURED BAC TEST REPORTS ALWAYS + .08  AND IN OVER 90% OF CASES  + .2  TO ENHANCE OFFENSE TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR WITH NO POSSIBILITY OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION. ARE  SAID MANUFACTURED BAC REPORTS ARE SENT FROM THE NOTORIOUSLY CORRUPT EVIDENCE TAMPERING TDPSCFL  AND ARE SELF ASSURED TO BE  “99.7 ‘CONFIDENCE LEVEL’,” A TAUTOLOGY FOR “ACCURACY LEVEL.”  THE TRUTH IS NO ONE KNOWS HOW ACCURATE THE BAC TEST IS.  IPSO RES, IGITUR , THE TDPSCF LAB SELF ASSURED “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL”  IS   NON SCIENTIFIC DISTORTION TO INTIMIDATE DUI/POM FRAUD VICTIMS IN FEAR AND IGNORANCE OF THE BAC TEST TO UNCONSTITUTIONALLY FORFEIT THE VI AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL WITH A JURY WITH NO MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE I.E.THE SPECIOUS TDPS BAC REPORTS AND PLEA “BARGAIN”  GUILTY.  THE LITE SENTENCE IS SIMPLY TO INDUCT THEM INTO THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SYSTEM WITH A MINIMUM OF EFFORT AND RESISTANCE.

 

IF ONE AND A MILLION, LIKE THE APPELLANT, KNOWING HIS CONSTITUTIONAL AND GENEVA RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED BY THE VIOLENT SEIZING OF HIS BLOOD AFTER REFUSAL, UNDERSTANDING THE FUNDAMENTALS OF BAC- FOR A MALE ONE DRINK PER HOUR IS ELIMINATED BY THE LIVER AND WHAT .231 BAC INDICATORS ARE,  REFUSES TO PLEA BARGAIN GUILTY AND REJECTING THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD CO CONSPIRATOR COMPROMISED  $15,000 SHAM DUI LAWYER TO BE ACQUITTED EVEN IF THE APPELLANT WAS AT .231,   THE APPELLANT WAS NOT  AT BAC. 231 ACCORDING TO THE TDPS DUI OFFENSE REPORT APRIL 4TH, 2016,    PLEADS NOT GUILTY AS DEFENDANT PRO SE, THEN JUDGES SUCH AS  JOHN LOVETT ATTEMPT TO TERRORIZE THE DEFENDANT PRO SE  NOT TO GO TO TRAIL AS SUCH WITH  ONE YEAR IN JAIL AND A TEN THOUSAND DOLLAR FINE  FOR 1STDUI IF THEY DO NOT PLEA BARGAIN GUILTY.

 

JUDGES SUCH AS JOHN LOVETT, ERNEST MCCLENDON, WAYNE MACK IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ARE A LEGACY MONSTROUSLY  STILL ANIMATED BY THE  CONSTITUTIONALLY  REPEALED 18TH AMENDMENT,  AND SO CALLED  “PROHIBITION” IN THE MODERN  CONTEXT OF DRINKING AND DRIVING DUI.  EMBOLDENED BY THE SELF JUSTIFICATION OF HIGHWAY ELECTRIC BILLBOARD MADD SLOGANS ‘DRINK, DRIVE, GO TO JAIL,’  “NO REFUSAL'”,  PLEA BARGAINING GUILTY, DRACONIUM JAIL TIME AND CRUSHING FINES  FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUGS, THE RISE OF THE PENAL, POLICE STATE IN DENIAL OF THE 21ST AMENDMENT REPEAL OF THE 18TH  BY THE TDPSC DUI/POM  REVENUE FRAUD IS A MONEY HUNGRY  DISAVOWAL BY THE STATE OF TEXAS OF THE US CONSTITUTION AND BETRAYAL OF THEIR OATH TO PROTECT AND TO SERVE TEXANS RIGHTS AND WELL BEING AGAINST DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE CONSTITUTION LIKE SAID JUDGES, THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD AND THE FERTITA/DINARDO/FRANCIS/ HELU SINALOA FEDERATION CARTEL.

 

THE TDPSCD/P  REVENUE FRAUD SINE QUA NON  CANNOT IN ANY CASE AND DOES NOT ALLOW EVEN AFTER A SIGNED BAC REFUSAL,  BLOOD NOT TO BE DRAWN UNDER DURESS FOR THE MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED TDPSCF LAB  BAC UNDERSIGNED REPORTS  IN 100% OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF DUI/POM IN TEXAS.  ALLOWING THE BLOOD NOT TO BE SEIZED IN 100% OF CASES AFTER INSTANTER ISSUED OR ALLOWING JUST ONE TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT TO BE RETESTED BY THE SAME TDPS LAB AND BAC TECHNICIAN WHO UNDERSIGNED THE REPORT WOULD  EXPOSE AND INDICT THE TDPSCD/P AS ORGANIZED CRIME GOVERNMENT POLICE CORRUPTION VIOLATING TEXANS CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW FOR 2.5 BILLION A YEAR, WHILE SERVING TO SHIELD SAID ORGANIZED CRIME HUMAN, CHILD SEX SLAVE, DRUG, AND ARMS TRAFFICKING ON THE I-10, -I-59/69.   IF EVEN ONE TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST REPORT CAME BACK FROM THE TDPS LAB BELOW .O8. SO FAR THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED , AND IF IT DID HAPPEN IN JOHN LOVETT’S CASE, LOVETT  HAS DECLINED IN COLLUSION WITH TDPS AFTER THREE MONTHS TO SAY PUBLICLY   AS LOVETT PUBLICLY SAID HE  WOULD IN SAID  MAY 7TH, SAN JACINTO TIMES ARTICLE.

 

OVER 90%  BAC TESTS COME BACK  AFTER APRX. THIRTY DAYS AT BAC .2. NOT ONE HAS EVER COME BACK BELOW BAC .15 FROM THE LAB. THE REASON FOR THE NONE BELOW .O8 IS  A UNIVERSAL VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW BY THE TDPS IN THAT  THE TDPSCFL DOES NOT ALLOW RETESTING BY THE SAME TDPS BAC TECHNICIAN IN SAID TDPSFC LAB HARRIS COUNTY OR ANY TDPS TECHICIAN OF ANY DISPUTED FOR VALIDITY  BAC  BLOOD SAMPLES. EVEN WHEN REQUESTED BY THE APPELLANT AND THE APPELLANT COURT ORDER TO RETEST APPELLANT’S BAC  (EXHIBIT 12) DENIED IN COURT BY LOVETT ON JANUARY 9TH, 2017.  THERE IS UNIVERSAL VIOLATION OF THE 2015 MICHAEL MORTON LAW  DENYING IN EVERY DUI CASE IN TEXAS  BAC REPORT VALIDATION THROUGH RETESTING BY SAID REPORT LAB AND TECHNICIAN, SINE QUA NON,  IN ORDER TO PERPETUATE   TDPSCD/P  REVENUE FRAUD,

 

 

 

 A SIGNIFICANT REVENUE STREAM IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD DERIVING FROM THE PENAL STATE ARE COUNTY JAILS LIKE THE SJC JAIL- BUILT BY SHERIFF HUMPY PARKER DURING HIS THREE DECADE LONG REIGN OF TERROR AND MURDER IN SJC.  THE SAME SJC COURT THAT ENABLED HUMPY, ENABLED JOHN LOVETT  TO FALSELY JAIL THE APPELLANT  IN SAID FACILITY FOR TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT OF 180 DAYS WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION, AND LOVETT BY DELICT 2016 DUI FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT APRIL 6TH WARRANT AND SPURIOUS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION TO CONTINUE TO  JAIL APPELLANT PRO SE IN THE SJC OR MC JAILS FACILITY. SUCH FALSE JAILING IN THE SCHEME OF TDPSCD/P  IS AN ILL GOTTEN  SOURCE OF  COUNTY REVENUE  FROM TEXAS AND US TAX PAYERS ROOTED IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 AMERICAN CITIZENS AND TEXANS ARE CAUGHT UP IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUDWEB OF FALSE DUI AND POM ARREST  AND ARE FALSELY JAILED AT TAX PAYERS COST, I.E. THEIR OWN COST AS TAX PAYERS,  WITH  NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE (BAC) BEYOND SPURIOUS TESTIMONY BY  DUI INSTANTER ARRESTING OFFICERS WITH A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE CONTEXT OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.   OUNCE AN INSTANTER IS ISSUED,  DUI  CONVICTION BY PLEADING GUILTY IN BARGAINING MUST HAPPENED IN 99% OF CASES.  THE ONLY EXCEPTION IS  DRUNK DRIVERS WITH THE MONEY WHO ARE GUILTY OF DUI AND CAUSED COLLISIONS GOTTEN OFF EVERY TIME BY  DON’T KILL THE GOLDEN GOOSE DUI AMBULANCE CHASER LAWYERS FOR $15,000 DOLLAR OR MORE FEES.

 

GUILTY BY BEING CHARGED IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL  AND IS GENERATED BY CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT OF ALL LEVELS ADDICTED AND ABSORBED BY THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  EVEN IF THE DUI/FRAUD VICTIM  IS INNOCENT AND THE STATE HAS NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE THE SUSPECT HAS ANY ALCOHOL IN HIS BLOOD AT THE TIME OF ARREST FOR DUI,  AS IS EVIDENT IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE, .BAC BLOOD SAMPLES MUST BE TAKEN IN EVERY CASE THAT AN INSTANTER IS ISSUED. THE BAC BLOOD SAMPLES ARE SEIZED UNDER DURESS IN  %100 OF THE CASES WHEN AN INSTANTER IS ISSUED, EITHER ASSUMED VOLUNTARILY (IF THE SUSPECT DOES NOT VERBALLY REFUSE, THEIR CONSENT IS ASSUMED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT – AGAIN DUI DETAINEES ARE NOT READ THEIR MARANDA RIGHTS AND ARE INVINCIBLE IGNORANT OF THEIR V AND VTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO REFUSAL OF A TDPS BAC TEST AND BLOOD DRAW- SO THIS ASSUMPTION BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OF BAC CONSENT BY THE DUI ARREST SUBJECT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL DUE TO INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE CAUSED BY NOT BEING READ MIRANDA RIGHTS AND FALLACIOUS “NO REFUSAL WEEK END”  ELECTRONIC BILL BOARDS.   

 

BAC WRITTEN REFUSAL IS PUNISHABLE BY 180 DAY CONFISCATION OF STANDARD DRIVERS LICENSE,  AND BY LAW A 365 DAY SUSPENSION OF CDL. WHENEVER ONE SIGNS THE WRITTEN REFUSAL , AS APPELLANT DID ,  BLOOD IS NONETHELESS VIOLENTLY SEIZED  IN SPITE OF SIGNED REFUSAL IN ALL  DUI CASES SINE QUA NONE TO PERPETUATE THE TDPSCDP REVENUE SCAM.   BLOOD MUST BE DRAWN SINE QUA NON  AS PROP FOR A SPECIOUS BAC TEST REPORT IN THE OVER 90% OF CASES  AT BAC + .2,  AT A SCIENTIFICALLY INVALIDATED  SELF CERTIFYING “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL”  CONVICTING WITH BAC MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE  %  99  OF  TDPSC REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS  OF DUI BY PLEA BARGAINING GUILTY. 

 

 

VIOLATION OF RICO: THE DUI/POM FRAUD IS ORGANIZED CRIME RACKET ABSORBING AND MORALLY BLINDING TEXAS GOVERNMENT AND POLICE IN CORRUPTION, ADDICTNG ALL TO MONEY AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL POWER.

 

GOVERNOR ABBOTT, AS GOVERNOR, AND BEFORE ATTORNEY GENERAL OVERSEEING THE TDPSCD/P BY APPOINTING AS TEXAS GOVERNOR THE FIVE TDPS COMMISSIONERS,  HAS NEVER, IN CONJUNCTION WITH, OR IN OVERSEEING  ANY LEVEL OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, TDPS, SHERIFF, OR CITY POLICE  MADE AN ARREST AND CONVICTION OF A MEMBER OF THE TILMAN FERTITA/ CARDINAL DINARDO/FRANCIS/ HELU SINALOA FEDERATION CARTEL FOR BY SEMI DRUG ON THE I-10, I-59/69  TRAFFICKING, ARMS DEALING, BUT MOST ESPECIALLY  FOR  HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING IN THE STATE OF TEXAS. THE MURDER OF JAIME ZAPATA, AND OUTCOME OF THE BUSH/BARAK OPERATION FAST AND FURIOUS IN TEXAS WAS NEVER INVESTIGATED. HOUSTON/GALVESTON “FREE STATE” LEGACY FERTITA SYNDICATE HAS SINCE THE BEGINNING OF PROHIBITION IN 1919 ENCOMPASSED AND MORALLY SILENCED  THE  ARCHBISHOP OF OF ARCHDIOCESE OF Galveston/Houston VIA “VELVET GLOVE” TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT BRIBERY OF THE HUNDRED CLUB AND RACKET BASED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO SHIELD IN ADDITION TO THE TDPSCD/P SYNICATE AND NOW SFCARTEL CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING ON  THE I 10 AND I 59 SINCE THE THIRTIES.  HOUSTON IS THE WORLDS GREATEST HUB OF CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING VIA THESE ROUTES.  A RECENT UT  STUDY PLACES THE NUMBER OF SLAVES IN TEXAS AT 300,000, OF WHOM 78,000 OF CHILDREN ARE TRAFFICKED  BY ORGANIZED CRIME OLIGARCHS SUCH AS FERTITA, BUSH/CLINTON/BARAK/HELU SFCARTEL  AS CHILD SEX SLAVES IN SEMIS ENDLESSLY MOVE ALONG THE I-10, I-59/69.  78 % OF THESE CHILDREN IF AMERICAN CITIZENS DISAPPEAR INTO CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING VIA THE HELLISH TEXAS DEPARTMENT CHILD PROTECTION AGENCY AND FOSTER HOME PROGRAM. PERRY AS TEXAS GOVERNOR, AND NOW ABBOTT AS GOVERNOR ARE BEING SUIT BY A CHILDREN’S RIGHT NGO OVER THE UNCONSCIONABLE  ABUSES OF THE  TEXAS STATE CPA FOSTER HOME HELL ON EARTH (EXHIBIT 13)

 

THERE IS NO NATIONAL OR STATE  GOVERNMENT AGENCY DEDICATED TO LOCATING MISSING PERSONS, ESPECIALLY CHILDREN TRAFFICKED AS SEX SLAVES.  THE TDPS  TRADITIONALLY PUTS THE NUMBER AT 25,000 PER YEAR OF CHILDREN WHO “DISAPPEAR”  INTO CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING IN TEXAS BUT THE RECENT UT REPORT SHOWS THIS IS A MINIMIZING UNDERSTATEMENT. THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  ACTING AS AN INVISIBLE MAKING SHIELD HAS WITH 100% EFFICIENCY INSURED THESE 78 THOUSAND CHILDREN PLUS TRAFFICKED  IN TEXAS AS SEX SLAVES RELENTLESSLY ALONG THE I’10, I-59,69 ARE NOT INVESTIGATED, DISCOVERED AND RESCUED BEFORE THEY ARE ROUTINELY  MURDERED WHEN THEY HAVE LOST THEIR VALUE FOR TRAFFICKERS.

 

ABBOTT JUST AS PERRY DURING  PERRY’S 2012 FAILED PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN RECEIVED MILLIONS IN “CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS”  BUNDLED BY TILMAN FERTITA’S SYNDICATE MEMBERS  FRONTED BY THE HOUSTON COLAITION FOR PROGRESS.  ABBOTT’S CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION HEAD BEFORE HER FIERY ABDUCTION IN 2011, BY A RIVAL NEW ORLEANS  ORGANIZE CRIME CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKER SYNDICATE HISTORICALLY BASED IN NEW ORLEANS,  WAS JESSICA FERTITA, A CLOSE RELATIVE OF TILMAN FERTITA. JESSICA, THE HEIR OF THE FETTITA SYNDICATE, BESIDES ACTING AS A LEGISLATIVE AID IN A FURTIVE ATTEMPT BY TILMAN FERTITA, WHO OWNS THE GOLDEN NUGGET CASINO CHAIN,  TO LEGALIZE GAMBLING IN TEXAS BY STATE LEGISLATURE,  fERTTITA TILMAN IS  ENTRUSTED BY PERRY TO OVERSEE THE LEGAL TEXAS LOTTO THROUGH  LIEUTENANTS WHILE HISTORICALLY OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY AN ILLEGAL SYNDICATE  OF BLACKED OUT WINDOW  GAMBLING VENUES ALONG THE 59, 10, AND 209 CORRIDOR. ALL SAID VENUES IN WALLER COUNTY HAVE BEEN SHUT DOWN IN 2009 BY WALLER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ELIS MATTHIS, TO WHOM, ALONG WITH THE FBI GULF COAST ORGANIZED CRIME TASK FORCE, THE APPELLANT SUPPLIED INFORMATION ON JOE KUCIEMBE A FERTITTA SYNDICATE  LOCAL BOSS OPERATING OUT OF THE HEMPSTEAD COLUMBUS CLUB AS A FRONT TRACKING DRUGS, CHILDREN, BUT ESPECIALLY ROMANIAN AND POLISH AK 47’S TO THE MEXICAN CARTEL’S FROM THE PORT OF HOUSTON ALONG THE 1-10.  tHE APPELLANT DISCOVERED THE HEMPSTEAD COLUMBUS CLUB WAS A GUN RUNNING FRONT OF THE TILMAN FERTITA/SFC WHILE PASTORAL ADMINISTRATOR OF ST. CATHERINE DREXEL, HEMPSTEAD TEXAS. THE HUNDREDS OF SYNDICATE SEMI’S STAGING AT THREE IN THE MORNING AT THE 12,000 SQUARE FOOT COLUMBUS CLUB WITH ARMS FROM THE PORT OF HOUSTON, THE APPELLANT IS TOLD BY LOCALS HAS BEEN DORMANT AND SEMI’S NO LONG APPEAR IN THE EARLY MORNING AT THE HEMPSTEAD COLUMBUS CLUB.

 

IN WALLER COUNTY, AND SEEMINGLY ALONG THE I-10 AND 1-59, THE FERTITA BLACK WINDOW ILLEGAL GAMBLING VENUE WHERE DRUGS AND PROSTITUTION WERE AVAILABLE, AS WELL AS RESTAURANT VENUES IN THE TRADITION OF THE FREE STATE GALVESTON BALI ROOM HAVE CLOSED DUE TO THE BREAK UP OF THE SFC AND TAKE OVER BY NEW ORLEANS MAFIA BOSS POST KATRINA, 2011.  THE TILAMN FERTITA SYNDICATE BANKRUPTED AND FACING EXTINCTION SINCE 2011 DUE TO THE DISINTEGRATION OF THE SFC, DIVORCED FROM THE FR. MACIEL LEGIONARY OF CHRIST VATICAN BANK MONEY LAUNDERING ACCOUNT  IN 2008, AND HAVING THEIR OPERATIONS CURTAILED BY THE FED. FOR CARLOS SLIM HELU’S 2012 SUPPORT OF ASSAD IN SYRIA TO SAVE HELU’S MARONITE CATHOLIC RELATIVES FROM GENOCIDE BY ISRAEL PROXY ARMY ISIS-  ISIS IT SELF NOW DEFUNCT-SFC COCAINE AND METH TRAFFICKING HAS BEEN SUPPLANTED BY TEL AVI BASED CIA/PENTAGON HEROIN TRAFFICKING IN THE US FROM AFGHANISTAN MONEY LAUNDERED NOT THROUGH THE ROTHSCHILD CONTROLLED  VATICAN BANK, BUT CHASE/CITI BANK.  PRESIDENT TRUMP’S RECENT REFUSAL TO SEND 4,000 ADDITIONAL TROOPS TO AFGHANISTAN AND DESIRE TO REASSESS THE STATUS QUO IN AFGHANISTAN  (IF TRUMP IS NOT ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATED BY THE ROTHSCHILD’S LIKE FIVE PRESIDENTS BEFORE HIM, WILL HAVE A DESICCATING EFFECT ON TEL AVI BASED ORGANIZED CRIME GOVERNMENT BACKED TRAFFICKING  MONOPOLY IN THE US.  THE FREEDOM OF BOLIVIA, A MAIN SOURCE OF COCAINE FOR THE SFC, FROM ROTHSCHILD  INDEBTEDNESS VIA THE IMF AND WORLD BANK PRECLUDES FURTHER CONTROL OF THE BUSH/CLINTON/HELU SFC OF BOLIVIA COCAINE AS WELL AS CIA/MOSSAD.

 

UNTIL JESSICA FERTITA’S DISAPPEARANCE IN 2011,  JESSICA WAS  CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION BUNDLER FOR “TEXANS FOR ABBOTT” GREGG ABBOTT’S  CAMPAIGN ORGANIZATION FOR TAG AND THEN TEXAS GOVEERNOR.  JESSICA FERTITA, THE FLOWER OF THE SYNDICATE AND FUTURE HEAD, OVER SAW TILMAN’S SYNDICATE “BARELY LEGAL” CHILD SEX SLAVE INTERNET PORN RACKET MONEY LAUNDERED THROUGH BIG FIVE BANK CREDIT CARDS.  VIEWERS WERE FURTHER SHOOK DOWN IN BLACKMAIL  PAY TO PLAY SURCHARGES BY INTERNET THUGS POSING AS FBI AGENTS IN EXCHANGE FOR  NOT BEING PROSECUTED FOR INTERNET CHILD PORN.

 

AS GOVERNOR, ABBOTT AS WAS  PERRY, AND CARDINAL DANIEL DINARDO OF GALVESTON/HOUSTON AND AS  PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS VIA CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES, CATHOLIC CHARITIES, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSION ON REFUGEES  ARE SYNDICATED ASSOCIATES OF TILMAN’S HUMAN (REFUGEE) AND CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING SYNDICATE.  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IS A CENTRAL CRIMINAL  ELEMENT OF THE TILMAN/ ABBOTT/CARDINAL DANIEL DINARDO SYNDICATE SHIELDING THROUGH TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ABSORPTION OF COURT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT RESOURCES, THAT IN TURN SHIELDS NOT ONLY DRUG AND ARM I 10 AND I 59 SEMI SHIPMENTS ORGANIZED CRIME TRAFFICKING, SHIELDED BY TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ABSORPTION OF SAID LAW ENFORCEMENT RESOURCES FROM INVESTIGATION, ARREST, AND CONVICTION, BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY HUMAN  AND CHILD SEX SLAVING SEMI TRAFFICKING BY SAID CARTELS AND SYNDICATES.  MILITARY TECHNOLOGY READILY EXISTS TO PLACE MOBILE INFRARED HEAT SENSORS ON DRONES  TO DETECT HUMANS BEING TRAFFICKED IN SEMIS VIA THE I 10 AND I 59. THIS POSSIBLE CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING DETECTION SCENARIO IS PURPOSELY NOT EVEN CONSIDERED AND NOT DONE BY GOVERNOR ABBOTT IN A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST AS SHOWN.

 

GOVERNOR ABBOT IN FACT, IN SPITE OF PUBLIC BLUSTER TO THE CONTRARY, NOT SECURED THE BORDERS OF TEXAS FROM AN INFLUX OF CHILD SEX SLAVE SFC ASSOCIATED FROM CENTRAL AMERICA IN 2011, NOR REFUGEES CLAIMED TO BE FROM  SYRIA (THE FBI CAN NOT KNOW THE ORIGIN OF THESE SO CALLED REFUGEES)  TRAFFICKED BY  CARDINAL DINARDO VIA CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES INTERNATIONAL AND CATHOLIC CHARITIES LOCALLY. AS CARDINAL ARCHBISHOP OF GALVESTON HOUSTON DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OPERATED IN CONJUNCTION WITH HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSION FOR REFUGEES ON THE MEXICAN BORDER AND IN EUROPE SUPPORTED BY FRANCIS, NOW IN PUBLIC CONTRADICTION OF PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP’S WALL POLICY.

 

THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS WITH CARDINAL DINARDO AS HEAD HAS RECEIVED BILLIONS OF FEDERAL TAX PAYER DOLLARS VIA CRS AND CC TO TRAFFIC “VICTIMS” OF CHILD SEX SLAVERY AND REFUGEES (PREDOMINATELY MILITARY AGE MEN, THE WOMAN AND CHILDREN BEING SHEARED OFF INTO SLAVERY DURING TRAFFICKING BY THE UN, CRS).  AS SUCH, ABBOTT HAS NOT CONFRONTED DINARDO ON CRS CC TRAFFICKING NOT CLOSED OPEN BORDERS.  THIS ELEMENT OF THE FERTITA/HELU SFC SYNDICATE OF HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING OPERATION HAS SINCE THE ELECTION OF DONALD TRUMP, LIKE THE SO CALLED NWO, FALLEN INTO DISREPAIR. THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD PROTECTIVE SHIELD A SKELETON OF SIGNIFICANTLY DEFUNCT TILMAN/SF CARTEL TRAFFICKING OPERATIONS REMAINS IN FULL FORCE UNABATED IN SPITE OF ALL THIS.  DINARDO WITH ABBOTT OF GOVERNOR IS NONETHELESS ABLE TO TRAFFIC REFUGEES ALLEGEDLY FLEEING SYRIA, NONE OF WHOM ARE MEN, WOMAN, AND CHILDREN MARONITE CATHOLICS, IN TEXAS AND BE PAID VIA US TAX DOLLARS AND UN EURO’S FOR CRS AND CC LOGISTICS RENDERED. DINARDO’S TRAFFICKING HAS SERVED NO CATHOLICS IN SYRIA FROM SUFFERING GENOCIDE BY THE NOW DEFUNCT ISIS FOR THE PAST FIVE YEARS OF CIA/MOSSAD PROXY WAR IN SYRIA AGAINST PRESIDENT ASSAD .  BOTH CARDINAL DINARDO AND FRANCIS, VOCAL CRITICS OF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S HAVE SOVEREIGN BORDERS POLICIES IN REGARD TO MEXICO AND REFUGEES FROM ISRAELI SELECT COUNTRIES LIKE IRAN- EXCLUSIVE OF ISIS PROXY ARMY- 9/11 FUNDING SAUDI WHILE FINANCIALLY PROFITING FROM SAID TRAFFICKING AND SILENT ABOUT SAUDI/ISRAEL PROXY ARMY SLAUGHTER OF CATHOLICS IN SYRIA.

 

AS GOVERNOR,  ABBOTT APPOINTS THE FIVE NON PAID COMMISSIONERS OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BOARD WHO  IN THE NAME OF “CHARITY”  DEFRAUD TEXANS OUT OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, VIOLATING UNDER COLOR OF LAW  THEIR RIGHTS AND HUMAN DIGNITY  VIA THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS ‘ DUI/POM FRAUD TDPSC/D/P REVENUE FRAUD.  FIRST AND FORE MOST AS HEAD AMONG THE FIVE COMMISSIONERS BOARD  IS JOE THE CHIMP,  CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF  TILMAN’S HUNDRED CLUB.   ABBOTT IS  DEPENDENT ON THE FERTITA SYNDICATE FOR CAMPAIGN  BUNDLING CONTRIBUTIONS  AND DINARDO, A LONG TIME PITTSBURGH  ZAPPALA MAFIA FAMILY ASSOCIATE TO WHO DINARDO OWES HIS ELEVATION TO ARCHBISHOP OF GALVESTON HOUSTON FOR CAMPAIGN  ENDORSEMENT  FOR GOVERNOR AS “PRO LIFE” IN TANDEM  WITH  “PRO LIFE ABORTION PROFITEER” HUCKSTER ELIZABETH GRAHAM’S REVENUE FRAUD TEXAS RIGHT FOR LIFE TO DELIVER THE “PRO LIFE VOTE.” TO ENDORSE ABBOTT  TURNING  A BLIND EYE TO HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING ENSLAVED  FROM A HELLISH TEXAS CPA AND FOSTER HOME SYSTEM IS AN OXYMORON TO SAY THE LEAST, AND A SINE QUA IN SUPERFICIALLY SHIELDING BY THE CONSERVATIVE COVETED PRO LIFE MEDALLION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ROOTED IN CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING ENSLAVING CHILDREN PRIMARILY PIRATED FROM TEXAS  CPA AND FOSTER CARE PROGRAM

 

IN RETURN FOR FERTITA CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS INCLUSIVE OF CARDINAL DINARDO/ELIZABETH GRAHAM TEXAS RIGHT TO LIFE “PRO LIFE” TO BE ELECTED   TEXAS GOVERNOR, OR ATTORNEY GENERAL, ABBOTT (OR ANYBODY REALLY) HAS NEVER ON ANY LEVEL AS GOVERNOR OR ATTORNEY GENERAL OVERSCENE AN ARREST AND CONVICTION FOR CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING, DRUGS, GUN RUNNING, ET AL BY SEMI ALONG THE i-10, I-59/69 THAT HAS EXPOSED AND IMPACTED IN ANY way THE TILMAN FERTITA SYNDICATE AND THE BUSH/CLINTON/ OBAMA/HELU SFC TRAFFICKING OPERATIONS. THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD’S ARRESTING AND CONVICTION MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN TEXAS SINCE 2003 LIKEWISE HAS NOT BY DESIGN EXPOSED OR IMPACTED IN ANY MANNER SAID TRAFFICKING SYNDICATES IN ANY MANNER.

 

PRESIDENT TRUMP AND ATTORNEY GENERAL SESSIONS BORDER ENFORCEMENT AND SO CALLED “PEDOPHILE” BUSTS ARE THE FIRST AND ONLY INSTANCES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE US ON ANY LEVEL INVESTIGATING, DISCOVERING, AND ARRESTING CHILD SEX SLAVE PARTICIPANTS (CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IS A CENTRAL ELEMENT REVENUE STREAM IN CHILD SEX SALVE TRAFFICKING). MOREOVER, THE CORRECT TERM IN THIS CONTEXT IS NOT “PEDOPHILE” BUT “PEDERAST.”  “PEDOPHILES” BY CLINICAL DEFINITION RAPE AND MOLEST THEIR OWN BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN. ALL PEDOPHILES ARE PEDERASTS, BUT % 97 OF PEDERASTS ARE NOT PEDOPHILES. FR. MACIEL DEGOLADO, CRIMINAL MASTERMIND AND  INVENTOR OF THE SINALOA FEDERATION CARTEL IN TANDEM WITH THE BUSHES/CLINTONS/ HELU AND GARZA FAMILIES, INVENTED INTERNATIONAL CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING OF AND FOR THE POOR AND POLITICALLY DISENFRANCHISED VIA CHILDREN FOR SALE IN CANTINAS ACROSS THE UNITED SATES TRAFFICKED BY SEMI ALONG THE I-10 AND I-59/69. FATHER MACIAL IS AN INFAMOUS EXAMPLE OF A PEDERAST WHO IS A TRUE PEDOPHILE. LEADING TO HIS REMOVAL BY THEN POPE BENEDICT IN 2006, AS HEAD AND INVENTOR OF THE SFC MONEY LAUNDERING ROTHSCHILD VATICAN BANK FRONT, THE LEGIONARIES OF CHRIST, THE SECULAR MEXICAN PRESS EXPOSED FATHER MACIEL, A CATHOLIC PRIEST, HAD “FATHERED” SEVERAL BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN BY TWO DIFFERENT MOTHERS.  MACIEL A TRUE PEDOPHILE, HAD MOLESTED AND RAPED HIS SONS, ACCORDING TO MACIEL’S ADULT CHILDREN. UNDER  GOVERNOR ABBOTT’S  EYES,  ABBOTT’S APPOINTED TDPS COMMISSIONERS  VIA THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE SCAM  ADDICTS AND ABSORBS AND BLINDS TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT TO SHIELD WITH INVISIBILITY  THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DRUGS, ARMS, AND MOST PRECIOUSLY CHILDREN AND HUMAN BEINGS BEING RELENTLESSLY  TRAFFICKED VIA THE I-10 AND I 59/69.

 

TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT BETRAYED BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS AND TEXAS GOVERNMENT AT ALL LEVELS ARE SHACKLED AND BLINDED BY BEING ABSORBED ENFORCING MILLIONS OF CONTRIVED  DUI ARRESTS;  SEARCHING AND FINDING A FEW SPECKS OF CANNABIS (WHILE SYNDICATE SEMIS OF DRUGS ARE SHIELDED FROM INVESTIGATION ARREST AND CONVICTION FOR POM BY TDPSCD/P RF. IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION. FOR THIS REASON POM IS  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. TDPSCD/P RF ALLOWS SEMI LOADS OF METH, HEROIN, CANNABIS FROM MEXICO, AND MOST IMPORTANT SEMI LOADS OF CHILD SEX SLAVES  TRAFFICKED FROM VENUE TO VENUE EVERY TWO WEEKS TO DO SO UNIMPEDED BY TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT IN ANYWAY, WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY RUINING THE LIVES OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS FOR POM. THIS IS A VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION INHERENT IN THE CONTEXT OF TDPS COMMISSIONERS D/P REVENUE FRAUD MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF POM AS WELL AS DUI.

 

CHILDREN SEX SLAVES ARE PRESENT AT MOST CANTINA IN TEXAS AT ANY MOMENT, AS DRUGS ARE UNIVERSALLY, AND YET WITH ONLY ONE MEMORABLE BUST AT A CANTINA IN HEMPSTEAD TEXAS, AND ONE IN HOUSTON, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF THESE CHILDREN ARE ENSLAVED, HELLISHLY EXPLOITED AND MURDERED BY BEING MADE INVISIBLE BY TRAFFICKING AND TRAFFICKER GOVERNMENT AND ORGANIZED CRIME KINGPINS SHIELDING BY THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  LIKE MILLIONS IN TEXAS FALSELY CONVICTED OF DUI/POM, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF THESE CHILDREN  ARE IN A LIKE MANNER BEING MADE IN  INVISIBLE-DENIED THEIR CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND FALSELY IMPRISONED BY TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, MURDERED ULTIMATELY  BY GOVERNMENT/POLICE CORRUPTION VIA  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  ABSORBING ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS TO SHIELD CARTEL TRAFFICKING.

 

MILITARY  INFRARED TECHNOLOGY TO VIEW  INTO  SEMIS FROM SILENT HIGH FLYING  DRONES CAN READILY  ASCERTAIN, UNDETECTED, IF SEMIS ARE TRANSPORTING CHILDREN ALONG THE I 10, I 59, AND COMING ACROSS THE BORDER.  HAVING THIS CAPACITY, A COMPLICIT, CONFLICTED  GOVERNMENT DOES NOTHING.  ICE, DHS-AS THEY ARE NOW DOING UNDER PRES. TRUMP- AND THE OFFICERS OF TDPSHPO IF FREED TO DO SO WOULD JOYFULLY WITH PRIDE DO THEIR SWORN DUTY WITH A VENGEANCE TO DESTROY HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING ARRESTING TRAFFICKERS TO THE HIGHEST LEVEL AND FREEING CHILDREN FROM HELL AND MURDER, IF  TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT  UNSHACKLED BEING AWARE WAS FREED FROM

TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ABSORPTION RESCUED THESE CHILDREN AND ARRESTED CARTEL TRAFFICKERS VIA CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING STOPS ALONG THE I 10 AND I 69, ET AL.

 

THE FIVE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS  APPOINTED FOR SIX YEARS WITHOUT COMPENSATION BY GREG ABBOT BY VIRTUE OF BEING GOVERNOR, IN A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (AS SHOWN)  MANAGE  TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  SPECIOUSLY IN THE NAME OF THEIR FAKE CHARITIES  AS A GOVERNMENT IMPOSED  MONOPOLY EXTORTION TO BENEFIT THESE FAKE  CHARITIES. TDPSD/P REVENUE FRAUD OSTENSIBLY  “IS FOR CHARITY”  IS ANOTHER ASPECT OF SHIELDING ORGANIZED CRIME AND GOVERNMENT POLICE CORRUPTION.  A “CHARITABLE END” SUCH AS CHRONICALLY UNDERFUNDED HOSPITAL TRAUMA UNITS, I.E. CARDINAL DINARDO’S CHI-ST. LUKE, OR ROAD IMPROVEMENT JUSTIFIES THE FRAUDULENT  MEANS EVIDENT IN THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF MILLIONS IN TEXAS IN TANDEM WITH THE PROGRAM OF DRIVERS SAFETY LAW AND LICENSE REVOCATION PROGRAM. THE 2003 TDP SAFE DRIVING PROGRAM LAW CONFISCATES VIA TDPSC/D/P RF VIA A CIVIL PROCEDURE THE APPELLANT’S DRIVER’S LICENSE FOR SIGNED BAC BLOOD DRAW REFUSAL FOR 180 DAYS LEAVING THE APPELLANT DEVOID OF HIS TEXAS ID AS WELL.  MOREOVER IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY TDPS SURCHARGES $125 AFTER 180 DAYS TO RECEIVE LICENSE BACK.  BY THE 2003 LAW, ONLY CDL CAN BE CONFISCATED FOR BAC REFUSAL. AND YET THE APPELLANT’S C/M LICENSE WAS ILLEGALLY CONFISCATED. IN PRACTICE, THETDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  VIOLATES IN 95% OF MILLIONS OF LICENSE CONFISCATION IN TEXAS BY THIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROGRAM  THE LETTER OF THE 2003 LAW WHICH WARRANTS SOLELY THE CONFISCATING OF THE CDL.

 

ALL TDPS SURCHARGES DERIVING FROM TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  CONSTITUTE DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION- BUT FOR A GOOD END- TO FUND TRAUMA HOSPITALS LIKE CARDINAL DANIEL DINARDO’S CHI-ST. LUKE AND ROAD IMPROVEMENT.  EXCEPT FOR BEING PAID TO UNCONSTITUTIONALLY STEAL TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS BLOOD UNDER THREAT AND DURESS, CHI ST. LUKE DOES NOT, NOR OTHER TRAUMA UNITS DO NOT RECEIVE MONEY FROM THE DUI/POM TDPSCRF CASH COW SCAM OF TEXAS VOTERS. NOR DOES A PUBLIC MONEY TRAIL OF THIS 2.5 BILLION DOLLARS TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  RUN ALONG  TEXAS ROADS. WHERE DOES THE MONEY GO? IT, LIKE TEN TRILLION DOLLARS VIA THE PENTAGON, JUST DISAPPEARS.

 

THE HEAD COMMISSIONER OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, JOE KUCIEMBE, IS ALSO HEAD OF TILMAN FERTITA’S HUNDRED CLUB.  THE HUNDRED CLUB HAS HISTORICAL ORIGINS IN FREE STATE GALVESTON MACEO/FERTITA SYNDICATE ORGANIZED CRIME CONTROL OF TEXAS GOVERNMENT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT/AND THE BISHOP OF GALVESTON/HOUSTON. ON THE ONE HAND, ANYONE WHO MAKES A DONATION TO THE 100 CLUB AND GETS A WINDOW STICKER CAN EXPECT NOT TO BE PULLED OVER, CITED, AND OR SEARCHED AND ARRESTED FOR DUI/POM BY TDPS ST TROOPERS AND OR THE HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE OR POLICE FORCE FOR RECKLESS DRIVING OR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ONE’S VEHICLE.  A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ARISES FOR THE CEO OF 100 CLUB SERVING  ALSO  AS THE HEAD COMMISSIONER OF THE TDPS IN THE PRETEXT OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. THIS SAME SHIELDING, MAKING INVISIBLE TO TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFECT THE 100 CLUB STICKER HAS ON THE WINDSHIELD OF THE CAR OF THOSE WHO CONTRIBUTE TO THIS OSTENSIBLY  WIDOWS AND ORPHANS BENEVOLENT CHARITY FOR POLICE AND FIRE FIGHTERS APPLIES IN TANEM WITH TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  TO FERTITA/SFC TRAFFICKING SEMIS. PERHAPS THESE SEMI’S HAVE THE STICKER OR SOME OTHER FORM SIGN MAKING  CARTEL TRAFFICKING SEMIS INVISIBLE TO TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE SAME MANNER A HUNDRED CLUB STICKER PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED DOES.

 

 

Governor GREG ABBOT, FAILED TO CERTIFY  AS GOVERNOR  THE APPELLANTS MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION OF JOHN LOVETT IN SJCC 2016-215- THAT EVENTUALLY, WITH THE GOVERNOR’S FULL KNOWLEDGE AND TACIT ASSENT, LEAD TO THE FALSE SENTENCING AND  IMPRISONMENT OF THE APPELLANT AS A INNOCENT VICTIM OF THE TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE SCAM IN SJC JAIL ON MARCH 19TH, 2017 FOR 365 DAYS WITH NO PROBATION BY ORDER OF JOHN LOVETT WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING AS SJCC JUDGE. ABBOTT AS TEXAS GOVERNOR IN FAILING TO CERTIFY LOVETT’S IPSO FACTO DISQUALIFICATION AND ASSENTING TO THE FALSE JAILING OF THE APPELLANT IN SJC JAIL BY ORDER OF LOVETT, ACTED OUT OF A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN NOT CERTIFYING THE APPELLANT’S DISQUALIFICATION MOTION OF LOVETT IN PROTECTING FROM EXPOSURE IN COURT ABBOTT’S TDPSCD/P  ORGANIZED CRIME CRONIES, FERITITA, CARDINAL DINARDO, JEB BUSH AND ABBOTT’S OWN GOVERNMENT/POLICE DUI/POM SCAM FROM BEING PUBLICLY EXPOSED AND IMPEDED DIRECTLY VIA THE TEXAS GOVERNOR’S  CERTIFICATION OF LOVETT’S DISQUALIFICATION BY THE DISQUALIFICATION MOTION OF THE APPELLANT. GOVERNOR ABBOTT’S REFUSAL TO CERTIFY LOVETT’S IPSO FACT DISQUALIFICATION IS A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF JUDICIAL INTEREST ANALOGOUS TO THE MC COURT LAW FIVE JUDGE DISAPPEARING LOVETT’S JUDICIAL FRAUD FROM THE MAY 19TH, 2017 DISMISSAL ORDER FOR JUSTICE.

 

GOVERNOR ABBOTT IN NOT CERTIFYING THE APPELLANT’S TIMELY AND JUST MOTION TO DISQUALIFY LOVETT AS JUDGE IN  RE:  SJCC  2016 -215- BEYOND A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST SO AS NOT TO EXPOSE THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S (ALL APPOINTED AS CRONIES BY GOV. ABBOTT) DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE, ABBOTT SOUGHT THROUGH SUSTAINING  LOVETT’S SENTENCING THE APPELLANT TO 365 DAYS WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION- WHICH DE FACTO ABBOTT DID THROUGH NOT DISQUALIFYING LOVETT BY CERTIFICATION, AND… OR  ABBOTT NOT RESPONDING TO SEVERAL URGENT PLEAS TO THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE FOR JUSTICE  AND THE GOVERNOR’S  INTERVENTION TO PREVENT THE APPELLANT BEING JAILED FOR  365 DAYS IN SJC JAIL IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCHEME.  ABBOT DID SO TO  FALSELY JAIL AND THERE BY POLITICALLY  SILENCE THE APPELLANT DURING THE UPCOMING ELECTION YEAR 2018. THE APPELLANT HAS PUBLICLY CRITICIZED GOV. ABBOTT SINCE 2013 IN SEVERAL HISTORICAL POSTS ON THE APPELLANT’S INTERNET BLOG, HOLY TRANSPARENCY.WORDPRESS.COM .

 

ABBOTT WHILE TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL UNDER THEN GOVERNOR  PERRY, THE APPELLANT SHOWS,  ORCHESTRATED  AS THEN TEXAS AG THE EXONERATION OF  ABORTED ALIVE AND HARVESTED  WHOLE BY PLANNED PARENTHOOD  DR. DOUGLAS KARPEN VIA A CHIP DAVIS/DEVON ANDERSON “KEY MAN GRAND JURY”  NO BILL.  “PRO LIFE”  VOTE ABORTION PROFITEER, ABBOTT,  WHOSE ELECTION AS TEXAS GOVERNOR IS PREMISED ON  A “PRO LIFE”  ENDORSEMENT TO GARNER THE CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN “PRO LIFE” VOTE, WILLED THE SECRETIVE BY KEY MAN GRAND JURY  “NO BILL” EXONERATION OF DOUGLAS KARPEN.   KARPEN’S ARRON WOMAN’S CLINIC IS “OUT PATIENT” LIKE PLANNED PARENTHOOD i-45 (PP MARKET’S INTACT VERY LATE TERM ABORTED ALIVE BY KARPEN BABIES FROM ARRON CLINIC TO BAYLOR MEDICAL SCHOOL INC. WHICH IN TURN  STAFFS B.M.S. INC.  MEDICAL SCHOOL PROFESSORS AS ABORTIONISTS  AT PLANNED PARENTHOOD I-45) AND AS SUCH ARE EXCLUSIVELY IN A STATE “OUT PATIENT CLINIC” MONOPOLY FRANCHISED BY “UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS.”  UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS ENJOYS A LUCRATIVE  TEXAS STATE WIDE GOVERNMENT SPONSORED MONOPOLY OF “OUT PATIENT” SURGICAL CLINICS.

 

ABBOTT  IN 2013,  AS TEXAS AG, HAD A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN COVER UP BY SECRETLY EXONERATING DOUGLAS KARPEN VIA  BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BIASED KEY MAN GRAND JURY.  ABBOTT’S ABORTION BUSINESS CONFLICT OF INTEREST  AS TEXAS AG IN KARPEN’S  EXONERATION  IS EXPOSED   BY THE APPELLANT PUBLICLY ON THE INTERNET IN SEVERAL HISTORICAL POSTS  ON HIS BLOG AT HOLYTRANSPARENCY.WORDPRESS.COM .

 

KARPEN’S  ARRON WOMEN’S ABORTION CLINIC ROUTINELY ABORTS ALIVE – KARPEN’S INFANTICIDE CONTINUES STILL TODAY AFTER ABBOTT ORCHESTRATED KARPEN’S NO BILL EXONERATION IN 2013- LATE TERM BABIES ALIVE BY INFANTICIDE AND SELLS THE BABIES’ BODIES IN TACT TO BAYLOR  MEDICAL SCHOOL, INC.  VIA PLANNED PARENTHOOD I-45 PROCESSING THESE BABIES’ BODIES. PLANNED PARENTHOOD  LIKE ARRON WOMEN’SS CLINIC IS EXCLUSIVELY AMONG  ALL TEXAS ABORTION CLINICS USP FRANCHISED.  KARPEN’S INFANTICIDE ROUTINE WAS EXPOSED IN 2012 BY A MARK KIRCHER LIFE DYNAMICS VIRAL YOU TUBE EXPOSE.  LONG TERM EMPLOYEES ROUTINELY PRACTICING ABORTION BY INFANTICIDE AT KARPEN’S UNITED SURGICAL PARTNER’S OUT PATIENT ABORTION CLINIC GAVE TESTIMONY OF KARPEN’S INFANTICIDE PRACTICE.   KARPEN  UNABATED AS  OUT PATIENT ABORTION CLINIC AND FRANCHISED AS SUCH AS USP MAINTAINS  A SERIES OF MAIMING  BY BOTCHED ABORTION AND EVEN DEATH OF PATIENT’S AT HIS USP CLINIC,  AGAIN NOT IMPEDED BY KARPEN’S  STATUS AS “OUT PATIENT” ABORTION CLINIC PROVIDED PARTNERSHIP IN USP.

 

IN SHORT, THEN. GOV. PERRY, ABBOTT, PLANNED PARENTHOOD I-45, VIA MILA PERRY JONES- PERRY’S LOBBYIST SISTER ALONG WITH HER LOBBYIST HUSBAND FOR UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS  AND BAYLOR MEDICAL SCHOOL INC. (BAYLOR MEDICAL SCHOOL INC. IS, WITH CHI-ST. LUKE-I.E. THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON HOUSTON THE PRIMARY STOCK HOLDER IN UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS)  SUPPRESSED THROUGH OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY CORRUPTED KEY MAN JURY IN EXONERATING KARPEN, KARPEN’S  ARRON ABORTION CLINIC’S  “ENHANCED SAFETY PRACTICE”  IN WOUNDING WOMEN  DURING ABORTIONS AND KARPEN’S ROUTINE PRACTICE OF ABORTING BABIES ALIVE AND WHOLE AND THEN TWISTING THEIR NECKS OR JABBING HIS FINGER INTO THEIR ABDOMEN’S TO MURDER THESE LIVING, VIABLE CHILDREN.

 

THESE FACTS HAD TO BE SUPPRESSED BY ABBOTT’S EXONERATION OF KARPEN FOR GOV. PERRY TO SIGN   IN  JULY SPECIAL SESSION 2013 “PRO LIFE” ABORTION PROFITEER SPURIOUS  HB2 BILL  INTO LAW IN TEXAS BY LAW MANDATING ALL ABORTION CLINIC IN TEXAS- FOR SAFER ABORTIONS- MUST BY LAW BE AMBULATORY SURGICAL. I.E. “OUT PATIENT.”  HB2 LAW SIGN IN A CRIMINAL ABORTION BUSINESS USP STOCK MONEY MAKING SCHEME BY PERRY AS GOVERNOR, SHUTTERED MOST NON OUT PATIENT ABORTION CLINICS-I.E. THOSE THAT COULD NOT PONY UP THE ONE MILLION DOLLAR PLUS CLUB MEMBERSHIP FEE TO BE “OUTPATIENT” TO  MILA PERRY JONE’S  UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS AS SUCH, GRANTING IN THEORY  A VIRTUAL ABORTION  STATE GOVERNMENT BACKED MONOPOLY TO UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS  IN THE LUCRATIVE ABORTION PROVIDER BUSINESS EXCLUSIVELY TO  SINCE 2010 “OUTPATIENT”  PLANNED PARENTHOOD  I-45 THE LARGEST “OUT PATIENT” ABORTED BABY PROCESSING  CLINIC IN THE WESTERN WORLD AND THE EXONERATED DOUGLAS KARPEN’S USP FRANCHISED ARRON’S OUT PATIENT ABORTION CLINIC (FIRST AND UPS OUTPATIENT ABORTION CLINIC FOR OVER A DECADE) WHOSE WHOLE BABY SALES TO USP PLANNED PARENTHOOD i-45 FOR PROCESSING FOR USP BAYLOR MEDICAL SCHOOL IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CARDINAL DINARDO’S CHI-ST. LUKE  WAS COVERED UP AS WELL IN THE SAME EXONERATING STROKE BY TEXAS AG ABBOTT.

CARDINAL DINARDO, AS  A 2010  USP FRANCHISED “GRAND OPENING”  OF  PLANNED PARENTHOOD I-45, THE LARGEST “OUTPATIENT” ABORTION CLINIC IN THE WESTERN WORLD, SECOND LARGEST IN THE WORLD ,  ONLY BEAT  BY PLANNED PARENTHOOD IN CHINA, WHERE ABORTIONS ARE FORCED BY LAW- A  POPULATION CONTROL POLICY FIRST PROPOSED  VIA G.H. BUSH WHEN U.S AMBASSADOR TO CHINA, BUT ONLY ADOPTED AFTER THE DEATH OF MAO- GAVE CORPORATE TRIBUTE BY GIVING ADMITTING PRIVILEGES TO NEAR BY ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL TO BAYLOR M.S. INC FOR BOTCHED ABORTION PATIENTS, BUT ONLY FOR THOSE VICTIMS WHO HAVE INSURANCE TO PAY FOR TREATMENT.

 

MOREOVER,  PLANNED PARENTHOOD I-45 WAS FOUNDED BY  ABBOTT AS “POR LIFE” ENDORSER CARDINAL   DINARDO IN THE TRADITION OF FR. MACIEL DEGOLADO TO PROVIDE LOGISTIC SUPPORT-ABORTION, CONTRACEPTION, STD INSPECTION AND TREATMENT FOR THE TILMAN FERTITA/SFC  CHILD SEX SLAVING  TRAFFICKING BUSINESS EMANATING VIA CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES OUT FROM THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON/HOUSTON BY SEMIS ALONG THE I-10 AND 59/69 IN TANDEM  WITH THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCHEME.

 

GOVERNOR ABBOTT DEFLECTING  SEVERAL DIRECT URGENT PLEAS DURING 2017 BY THE APPELLANT TO BE SAVED FROM BEING FALSELY JAILED FOR 365 DAYS IN SJC BY LOVETT, KNOWINGLY  APPROVED  AND AS GOVERNOR ALLOWED  SAID SENTENCING BY LOVETT TO BE ENFORCED LEADING TO THE  ARREST ON MARCH 13TH, 2017 HOLY THURSDAY AND MARCH 19TH   JAILING FOR 365 DAYS IN THE SJC JAIL .  GOVERNOR ABBOTT ORCHESTRATED  THE JAILING OF THE APPELLANT AT THIS TIME TO SILENCE THE APPELLANT PUBLICLY EXPOSING ABBOTT’S EXONERATION OF DOUGLAS KARPEN  FURTHER  BY HAVING THE APPELLANT JAILED IN TIME FOR THE UPCOMING 2018 GOVERNOR’S ELECTION.  THERE BY, ABBOTT SEEKING RE ELECTION AS GOVERNOR  SCHEMED IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO BY JAILING THE APPELLANT WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION DURING THE UPCOMING ELECTION SEASON,  PRECLUDE THE APPELLANT FROM CONTINUING TO VOICE PUBLICLY ON THE INTERNET  PERRY AND ABBOTT’S HB2  ABORTION BUSINESS  CONFLICT OF INTEREST FRAUD CRIMES BY OBSTRUCTION   OF JUSTICE IN KARPEN’S EXONERATION.  BY ABBOTT’S  SUSTAINING LOVETT’S  ILLEGAL SENTENCING OF THE APPELLANT LEADING TO THE APPELLANT’S ARREST AND JAILING FOR 365, ABBOTT BY NOT ACTING JUSTLY AS TEXAS GOVERNOR AND DOING HIS SWORN DUTY TO UPHOLD THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION ARTICLE FIVE, VIOLATED  THE APPELLANT’S  ‘S 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO FREE SPEECH AND PRESS.

 

 

MOREOVER, OVER  78% OF CHILDREN OF  80,000 PLUS  WHO “DISAPPEAR” INTO CHILD SEX SLAVING IN TEXAS  ARE PIRATED BY ORGANIZED CRIME CHILD SEX SALVE TRAFFICKING SYNDICATES  FROM THE  TEXAS CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES FOSTER CARE PROGRAM. ABBOTT, AS GOVERNOR, INHERITED FROM PERRY,  A  CLASS ACTION LAW SUIT AS TEXAS GOVERNOR BY  “THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN” ADVOCACY GROUP  FOR THE UNCONSCIONABLE HELLISH CPS FOSTER CARE PROGRAM WHO PERRY AND ABBOTT ALIKE AS CRONIES IN THE TDPSD/P REVENUE FRAUD  AS GOVERNOR FOR YEARS TURNED A BLIND EYE TO.

AS A CONCERNED AMERICAN PATRIOT AND A ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIEST MOST CONCERNED FOR SAID CHILDREN AND ALL  300,000 HUMAN BEINGS INVISIBLY ENSLAVED IN TEXAS   VIA THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  THE APPELLANT CALLS FOR AN  IMPANELING OF  A STATE GRAND JURY TO INVESTIGATE UNDER RICO THIS ( I.E. THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD)  ORGANIZED CRIME DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION FRAUD RACKET CORRUPTING TEXAS GOVERNMENT AND STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT BY PIRATING AND ABSORBING,  AND THERE BY  FOSTERS THE ENSLAVEMENT AND MURDER OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN AND HUMAN BEINGS IN TEXAS THROUGH HUMAN AND CHILD SEX SLAVING TRAFFICKING , DRUG ABUSE TRAFFICKING , AND ARMS DEALING TRAFFICKING.

 

PARADOXICALLY, THE TDPSCD/P DOES NOT STOP BY ANY OF ITS MILLIONS OF  UNDER COLOR OF LAW  VIOLATIONS OF TEXANS CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS   IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD,  TO THE CONTRARY BY DESIGN, THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD PROMOTES, SUSTAINS, AND GROWS UNDER THE CLOAK OF CHURCH AND STATE HUMAN. CHILD SEX SLAVING, DRUG ABUSE, AND GUN VIOLENCE AND MURDER.

 

MOREOVER, TEXAS DUI PROSECUTION LAW SHOULD BE MADE CONSTITUTIONAL BY CHANGING TO REFLECT DUI PROSECUTION LAW OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA: Nebraska Revised Statute 60-6,196 ET AL.

 

IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION ,  DUI CONVICTION IS THE ONLY CLASS OF STATE FELONY AND CLASS A AND B MISDEMEANOR THAT CAN NEVER BE EXPUNGED FROM THE CRIMINAL RECORD OF ANY PERSON IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI AT ANY SAID DEGREE  OF DUI OFFENSE ENHANCEMENT  FOR ANY REASON EXCEPT DUI CONVICTION DISMISSED PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.  THE DUI CHARGE IS ENHANCED BY NOT JUST PROVEN  TDPSCF LAB MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE AND SUPPRESSED BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE POTENTIALLY EXONERATING  THE INNOCENT ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH  DUI BASED SOLELY ON THE DUI INSTANTER ARRESTING OFFICER’S SWORN PROBABLY CAUSE DUI OFFENSE REPORT SELF VERIFIED ESTIMATION  OF DUI SUSPECT’S BAC AT FIRST +  .O8, CLASS B MISDEMEANOR,  AND SECOND AT BAC +.15  ENHANCED TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR.    SECONDARILY, SANCTION IS ENHANCED TO A STATE FELONY, WHEN AS WOULD HAVE BEEN THE CASE WITH JOHN LOVETT ON MAY IST,  A SECOND DUI GUILTY CONVICTION IS ACHIEVED WHEN THE DUI SUSPECT, AS JOHN LOVETT HAS, HAS A PERMANENT RECORD OF A PREVIOUS ARREST FOR DUI.  ENHANCEMENT AFTER FIRST DUI TO A STATE FELONY DUE TO VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE NEVER  TO BE EXPUNGED DUI FROM THE  CRIMINAL RECORD- FOR EXAMPLE AFTER SIX YEARS WITHOUT DUI ARREST AND CONVICTION  THE DUI CONVICTION  ON THE CRIMINAL RECORD WHICH IS A PUBLIC SOURCE OF SCANDAL AND SHAME COULD BE EXPUNGED FROM CRIMINAL RECORD TO REWARD SOBRIETY  AND SAFE DRIVING- BUT TO THE CONTRARY, IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE DUI CONVICTION IS PERMANENT ON THE CRIMINAL RECORD AND AN UNENDING  PUBLIC SOURCE  OF SHAME AND HUMILIATION, UNLIKE ANY OTHER CLASS OF CRIMINAL OFFENSE.  THIS PERMANENT CRIMINAL RECORD  FOR DUI OFFENSE “SOLELY” AND “UNIQUELY” IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE   SINE QUA NON IN THE PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD A CRIMINAL ELEMENT IN SAID REVENUE FRAUD BY DRAMATICALLY INCREASING REVENUE FLOW FROM JAILING, PROBATION, TDPS SURCHARGES, AND FINES.  THIS IS WHY IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE DUI CONVICT IS PERMANENT ON THE DUI CONVICT’S CRIMINAL RECORD AND CAN NOT BE EXPUNGED FOR ANY REASON BUT PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

 

AT ARREST  FOR DUI/POM , THE VEILING OF KNOWLEDGE OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IS SINE QUA NON, TO INSTILL LEGALLY VINCIBLE IGNORANCE TO PERPETRATE THE  TDPS  COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  IN SUPPRESSING DUI DEFENDANT CONSTITUTIONAL AWARENESS OF RIGHT TO  BAC REFUSAL AND AS SUCH A  SINE QUA NON ELEMENT TO PERPETRATE TDPSCD/P/REVENUE FRAUD. RES IPSO IGITUR, 100% OF TDPSC DUI /POM REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS UNIQUELY AND EXCLUSIVELY ARE NOT READ  MARANDA RIGHTS IN THE STATE OF TEXAS AT ARREST IN THE PRETEXT OF TDPSCD/P REVENEUE FRAUD SCHEME. THIS IS A VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE GIVING PLAINTIFF STATUS IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT TO ALL VICTIMS OF TDPSCD/P FRAUD VICTIMS IN  SAID  VIOLATION OF THE VTH AMENDMENT FOR UNEQUAL DENIAL OF  MIRANDA RIGHTS AT ARREST. NOT READING THE DUI/POM SUSPECT THEIR MIRANDA RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  HAS BEEN UP HELD BY THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT EXCLUSIVELY AND SOLELY AT DUI ARREST IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD SCHEME. THIS TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IS IN  VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL  PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE US CONSTITUTION.   

 

 FURTHERMORE, AT DUI ARREST IN CONTEXT TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS IN TEXAS  NOT TO BE  READ  MIRANDA RIGHTS HAS A CHILLING EFFECT ON  CIVIL RIGHTS PROTECTIONS AFFORDED BY THE IV. V, AND VI AMENDMENTS  AND AS SUCH  INSTILLS  FEAR AND BLIND SUBMISSION TO ARREST AND  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN VINCIBLE IGNORANCE, SINE QUA NON FOR  PERPETRATION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD AND GREATLY AIDED BY AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DUI PROSECUTION TEXAS STATE CODE.

 

 DUI ARREST IS THE ONLY CLASS A/B MISDEMEANOR IN THE CONTEXT  OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, THAT THE SUSPECT, INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY AND NOT SUBJECT TO GIVE PHYSICAL OR VERBAL EVIDENCE TO INCRIMINATE HIMSELF A PROTECTION AFFORDED BY THE VTH AMENDMEN , IS NOT READ HIS MIRANDA RIGHTS AT THE MOMENT OF ARREST.  SINE QUA NON,  IGNORANCE, FEAR, BLIND SUBMISSION RULE TO PERPETUATE VICTIMS PASSIVITY IN  THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.   UNCONSTITUTIONAL TEXAS DUI/POM PROSECUTION CODE MUST BE MADE CONSTITUTIONAL BY THE READING OF MARANDA RIGHTS  AT TIME OF ARREST FOR DUI/POM AND RECOGNITION BY TEXAS CODE ANYONE IN TEXAS OF SOUND MIND HAS THE RIGHT TO REFUSE OR FREELY CONSENT TO GIVING BLOOD SAMPLE FOR THE BAC TEST, AND HAVE THE 5TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DO SO. WHENEVER IN EVERY CASE  REFUSAL VERBAL, AND.. OR SIGNED IS MADE, NO  BAC TEST CAN LEGALLY BE DONE FOR OR BY THE TDPS OR ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT BODY IN TEXAS,   AND BLOOD SAMPLES CAN NOT BY FORCE BY TAKEN WITHOUT PROVOKING CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LIABILITY THERE BY. 

 

.

 IPSO RES, IGITUR, NOT BEING READ AND  VINCIBLE IGNORANT OF  MARANDA  RIGHTS-,  WITH NO PHYSICAL BAC EVIDENCE AT HAND, JAILED  SOLELY BY DUI  INSTANTER OF TDPSHPO ARRESTING OFFICER’S SWORN DUI OFFENSE REPORT, THIS SAME INSTANTER OFFICER, IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE  WAS NOT THE FIRST OFFICER TO ILLEGALLY STOP AND ARREST THE APPELLANT ON APRIL 4TH, 2016 IN LIBERTY COUNTY I-59. (THE APPELLANT WAS STOPPED AND ARRESTED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE BY A SJC S DEPUTY, JESSE SLAUGHTER)  MOREOVER THE DUI INSTANTER OFFICER THAT NIGHT, TDPSHPO BILLY CORLEY, JR. DID NOT PERSONALLY EVER WITNESS THE APPELLANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL,  AT ANY TIME BEFORE OR AFTER HIS  FIRST ARREST, TDPSHPO ARE CALLED IN BY LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AS PART OF A FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAM TO ISSUE DUI INSTANTERS AFTER THE FACT, NOT FIRST STOPPING WITH PROBABLE CAUSE AND ARRESTING  RANDEM MORTORISTS IN TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD FOR OFFENSES OTHER THAN DUI. THE TDPSHPO WHO ISSUE AN INSTANTER SOLELY ON HIS OWN ALLEGED BAC OBSERVATION EXPERTISE IN ENFORCING TEXAS DUI LAW, NEVER WITNESSES THE LATER AFTER THE FACT OF BEING STOPPED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE, TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIM DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL OF THE VEHICLE  BEFORE OR AFTER ARREST BY ANOTHER OFFICER WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE. THIS IS IN VIOLATION OF THE IVTH AMENDMENT AND INVALIDATES ALL DUI CONVICTIONS IN TEXAS PERPETRATED IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD THERE BY.  SAID VIOLATIONS GIVE PLAINTIFF STANDING  IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT TO ANY ONE IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI THERE BY.

 

 

 IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, THE DUI INSTANTER OFFICER DID NOT BEFORE OR AFTER  FIRST ARREST NOT FOR DUI, PERSONALLY WITNESS THE APPELLANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL OF HIS VEHICLE BEFORE OR AFTER HIS ARREST FOR DUI.  AS SUCH, ALONE,  MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED POSSIBLE EXONERATING BLOOD EVIDENCE ILLEGAL GOTTEN AS FORBIDDEN FRUIT OF A POISONOUS TREE  TRIGGERS A SPURIOUS IN ALL CASES +.15TDPSFC LAB  BAC  REPORT  A MONTH LATER AND THIS FRAUDULENT BAC TEST SUFFICES  SOLELY AND REPLACES IN DUI/POM MALICIOUS  PROSECUTION  IN TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM. REVENUE FRAUD ,  AND UNCONSTITUTIONALLY  REPLACES  AND SUPPLANTS A FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENT OF LICIT DUI CONVICTON,  A CREDIBLE WITNESS OBSERVING THE DEFENDANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL BEFORE OR AFTER STOP AND ARREST FOR OTHER THAN DUI.   THE EXCLUSIVE STANDARD FOR DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS OF DUI BY SPURIOUS TDPSCFLAB BAC REPORT ALONE VIOLATE’S THE IV AMENDMENT AS WELL AS THE VITH, AND EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE. THIS VIOLATION GIVES PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT TO ANYONE IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI THERE BY.  

 

OPEN CONTAINER CHARGES ARE NOT ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE OF  DUI IN COURT DUE TO CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST AS MANUFACTURED PLANTED  EVIDENCE IN FRAUDULENT AND FALSE DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AS EVIDENCED IN APPELLANT’S FALSE DUI CONVICTION BY PLANTED OPEN CONTAINER EVIDENCE. NOR IS AN OPEN CONTAINER AS EVIDENCE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT DERIVED FROM AN OPEN CONTAINER  A DUI SUSPECT WAS DUI AT THE MOMENT OF ARREST DUE TO AN OPEN CONTAINER AT ANY PART OF THE VEHICLE.  VIOLATION OF TEXAS RULE OF EVIDENCE #405, 404, 403.

 

TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ARE FORBIDDEN BY THE IVTH AND VTH AMENDMENT OF BILL OF RIGHTS  FROM DRAWING BLOOD UNDER THREAT AND DURESS FOR THE BAC TEST AND CONDUCTING THE BAC TEST ITSELF AND “SELF CERTIFYING” THE TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY  BAC TEST RESULTS REPORT AS “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL”  AND THERE BY PREVENT A  SELF EVIDENT  CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST EVIDENCED BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONS DUI REVENUE FRAUD USE OF MANUFACTURED BAC EVIDENCE FOR FALSE DUI CONVICTION AND THE SAME NOT ALLOWED TO BE RETESTED BY SAID SAME TDPSCF LAB AND SAID SAME REPORT UNDER SIGNER IN VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW IN 100% OF  TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM. REVENUE FRAUD MALICIOUS PROSECUTIONS IN TEXAS,  EVIDENT IN  THE USE OF A INHERENTLY FALLACIOUS .231 BAC TEST TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT OF A CLASS A  BAC+.15 MISDEMEANOR, DUI.  BLOOD SAMPLES CAN ONLY LICITLY BE DRAWN FOR BAC TEST ONLY WITH REASONABLE AND VOLUNTARY CONSENT OF THE DUI SUBJECT AND CAN ONLY BE DONE LICITLY ONLY BY  AN INDEPENDENT LAB OR MEDICAL FACILITY AT THE EXPENSE OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, AND NOT TAX PAYER EXPENSE DIRECTLY.  AN INDEPENDENT LAB TO DRAW BLOOD AND PROMPTLY COMPLETE THE BAC TEST AND REPORT ALONE BY LAW CAN LEGALLY DRAW BLOOD SAMPLES WITH LEGAL CONSENT AND COMPILE THE BAC REPORT FOR TEXAS STATE DUI PROSECUTION.  FOR A LAB TO BE INDEPENDENT TO THIS END, IT CAN NOT  IMITATE PRACTICE IN ANY WAY CARDINAL DINARDO’S CHI ST. LUKE’S DRAWING  BLOOD FOR THE TDPSCF LAB BAC FRAUDULENT TESTS IN A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON MULTIPLE LEVELS  TO PERPETUATE   TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM. REVENUE FRAUD IN DRAWING BLOOD AND RECEIVING “CHARITABLE” DONATIONS IN RETURN FROM THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD FOR ALLEGED  “TRAUMA UNITS”. 

 

 

THE BAC TEST MUST BE DONE BY A TRULY INDEPENDENT THIRD PARTY WITH NO FINANCIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE BAC TEST SAMPLE RESULTS. THERE CAN BE NO REASONABLE DOUBT THAT EVERY AND ALL BLOOD SAMPLES CONSENTED TO ARE ACTUALLY SUBJECTED TO SCIENTIFIC AND VALID BAC TESTING IN EVERY CASE AND AUDITED BY AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY AS SUCH. SAID INDEPENDENT LAB IS IN IN CONTRADISTINCTION TO CARDINAL DINARDO’S CHI-ST.LUKE WHICH HAS A CRIMINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN DRAWING BLOOD TO BE THAN TESTED BY TDPSCF LAB IN HARRIS COUNTY DUE TO ORGANIZED CRIME CONNECTIONS THROUGH CATHOLIC CHARITIES, CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES IN TANDEM WITH CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING BY THE FERTITA SYNDICATE (THAT CONTROLS GOV. ABBOTT, CARDINAL DINARDO, AND THE TDPSFC LAB THROUGH THE FIVE COMMISSIONERS) AND THE SINALOA FEDERATION CARTEL FOSTERED BY THE JPII/FR. MACIEL/CARLOS SLIM HELU CHASE/VATICAN BANK.  THE  FRAUDULENT MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED BLOOD SAMPLE  BAC EVIDENCE UNCONSTITUTIONALLY PIRATED FROM SAID UN CONSTITUTIONAL BLOOD DRAWS BY CHI-ST. LUKE’S NOT ONLY PRODUCE REVENUE FOR CHI ST. LUKE AS SUCH THROUGH ORGANIZED CRIME TRAFFICKING CONNECTION BY SUSTAINING THE DUI REVENUE FRAUD, BUT IN ABSORBING ALL COURT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IN SAID SCAM, CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES COMPLICITY IN CHILD SEX SLAVE TRAFFICKING IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FERTITA/SFC IS HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT FROM BEING UNVEILED BY THE COURTS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IN TEXAS BY UNDER COLOR OF LAW SUIT AND CLASS ACTION SUIT.  THE EVIDENCE OF THIS IS IN THAT TEXAS COURTS AND TEXAS LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE NEVER MADE A CHILD SEX SLAVE STOP AND ARREST ALONG THE I-10 ANDI- 69 WHILE HOUSTON/GALVESTON IS THE GREATEST CHILD SEX SLAVING HUB IN THE WORLD. A RECENT U.T. REPORT STATES THERE ARE  300,000 HUMAN TRAFFICKING VICTIMS, I.E. SLAVES, IN TEXAS, 78,000 CHILD SEX SLAVES PIRATED FROM TCPA AND FOSTER CARE SYSTEM -WHO ARE ROUTINELY MOVED IN SEMI TRUCKS  EVERY TWO WEEKS. AS IS EVIDENCED NO STOPS AND ARRESTS MADE OF   SEMI LOADS OF CANNABIS, HEROIN, METH, AND GUNS TRAFFICKED BY SAID ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE.

 

BAC BLOOD DRAWS TO BE USED IN DUI CRIMINAL PROSECUTION  CANNOT BE DRAWN  BY AN INDEPENDENT LAB WITHOUT SUSPECT’S CONSENT AND TRAINED AND CORRECT BAC LEVEL TESTIMONY OF  PROBABLE CAUSE OF  +.O8  BY ARRESTING OFFICER AT HAND.  BLOOD CANNOT BE TAKEN WITHOUT DUI PROBABLE CAUSE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, OR IF SUSPECT VERBALLY REFUSES AND/OR SIGNS A BAC REFUSAL.

 

 

 

THE BAC TEST IF CONSENTED TO BY  DUI SUSPECT IN CUSTODY MUST BE FULLY COMPLETED IN A REASONABLE TIME PERIOD ASAP  AND BAC TEST RESULT PUBLICIZED WITHIN  24 HOURS FOR THE +.O8  BAC DUI SUSPECT AND/OR ATTORNEY TO KNOW BEFORE P.C. HEARING IN SAID CASE.  BEFORE THE DUI SUSPECT IS JAILED PURSUANT OF THE DEFENDANT’S WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.  THE ADMINISTRATION OF BAC TEST WARRANTED SOLELY BY THE INSTANTER DUI ARRESTS OFFICER’S SWORN  UN VERIFIED BY BAC TEST ASSESSMENT THE DUI SUSPECT, WITHOUT WITNESSING SAID SUSPECT IN PERSON DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL BEFORE OR AFTER INSTANTER DUI ARREST, IS NOT EVIDENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE AND  CANNOT BE THE ONLY AND EXCLUSIVE CRIMINAL ELEMENT OF PROBABLE CAUSE OF DUI IN TEXAS FOR DUI PROSECUTION AND CONVICTION.  SUCH IS THE ANTI CONSTITUTIONAL CIRCULAR LOGIC OF THE BAC TEST AS BE ALL AND END ALL IN DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CASES OF THE TDPS COMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD.

 

THE BAC TEST FREELY CONSENTED TO- OR ONLY WHEN REASONABLE REFUSAL OF THE BAC TEST IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR THE DUI SUSPECT  DUE TO THE MANIFESTLY EVIDENT + .15  BAC OF THE DUI SUSPECT-MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN TWO HOURS OR ASAP BY INDEPENDENT BAC TEST  LAB ALSO DRAWING THE BLOOD SAMPLES AT THE SAME TIME. THE RESULTS MUST BY MADE KNOWN TO BAC TEST SUBJECT ASAP AFTER BEING COMPLETED.  IF AT OR BELOW .O8 BAC THE ARRESTED PERSON MUST BE IMMEDIATELY RELEASED,  IF ABOVE THE DUI SUSPECT MAY BE JAILED ON DUI PROBABLY CAUSE.  IN EITHER SCENARIO, THE BAC TEST RESULTS MUST BE REPORTED PUBLICLY- FOR EXAMPLE ON THE INTERNET WITHIN 24TH HOURS OF THE BAC TEST BEING COMPILED.

TEXAS DUI BAC TEST ABUSE IN NOT FOLLOWING THIS CONSTITUTIONAL  BAC TEST DUI CRIMINAL PROSECUTION PROTOCOL IN THE NEBRASKA DUI CRIMINAL CODE HAS VIOLATED THEREBY ROUTINELY BY SAID BAC TEST DUI  MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF EVERYONE IN TEXAS CONVICTED THERE BY OF DUI.  TO PERPETRATE THE  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, THE BAC TEST RESULTS AFTER DUI INSTANTER ISSUED   ARE NOT MADE KNOW TO THE DUI SUBJECT AFTER BLOOD SAMPLES FOR BAC TEST ARE DRAWN.  RATHER, BLOOD SAMPLES ARE MAILED NOT REFRIGERATED TO THE TDPSFC LAB, HARRIS COUNTY TRIGGERING A TDPSCF LAB BAC TEST RESULTS  UNDERSIGNED REPORT GENERALLY A MONTH OR SO LATER.  iN EVERY INSTANCE THEREBY POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC TEST RESULTS ARE SUPPRESSED IN THE INSTANTER JAILED DUI SUSPECT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE  THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  THIS ROUTINE SUPPRESSION OF POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC TEST LEVEL RESULTS  FOR ABOUT A MONTH TO 45 DAYS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE  TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VIOLATES THE DUI SUSPECTS WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND VITH AND VIIITH AMENDMENT WRITS IN EVERY INSTANCE AN GIVES PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT TO ANY IN TEXAS CONVICTED OF DUI THERE BY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

 

THE BAC TEST REPORT CANNOT BE USED AS THE SOL IPSO FACTO VERIFICATION OF THE INSTANTER OFFICER’S  PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT OF PROBABLE CAUSE OF DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL.

 

AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, THE INSTANTER DUI OFFENSE ARREST TDPSHP OFFICER’S DUI  OFFENSE REPORT- THE OFFICER DID NOT IN PERSON  WITNESS AT ANY TIME BEFORE OR AFTER THE APPELLANT’S ARREST EXCLUSIVELY FOR DUI, THE APPELLANT AS DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL, NOR REFERENCES SAID INSTANTER TDPSHPO HE DID NOT IN PERSON AT ANY TIME WITNESS THE APPELLANT DUI  BEHIND THE WHEEL, BEFORE OR AFTER THE APPELLANTS FALSE ARREST WITH NO PROBABLY CAUSE FIRST BY JESSE SLAUGHTER, AND SECONDLY BY SAID INSTANTER ISSUING OFFICER, TDPSHPO  BILLY CORLEY EXCLUSIVELY FOR DUI.  SAID DUI  SPURIOUS DUI OFFENSE REPORT BY SAID OFFICER   DOES NOT INDICATE THE APPELLANT  IN CUSTODY FOR  DUI ARREST PROBABLE CAUSE WAS DUI AT .231 BAC- ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT- WHICH THE SUBSEQUENT  SPURIOUS TDPSCF LAB  .231 BAC REPORT IN CONTRADICTION TO ALL THE  SPURIOUS BAC DETAILS  FALSELY CONVICTED  THE APPELLANT THEREBY.

 

A LICIT INDEPENDENT  BAC REPORT IS  NOT “SOL”, BUT AMONG SEVERAL  CRIMINAL ELEMENTS OF EVIDENCE CONSTITUTING  DUI PROBABLE CAUSE AND LICIT DUI CONVICTION THAT  THE DUI DEFENDANT  IS  DUI OPERATING A VEHICLE.

 

THE DUI ARRESTING OFFICER,  WARRANTING iNSTANTER JAILING OF THE DUI SUSPECT  AND  WARRANTS TDPSCF BAC TESTING SOLELY DUE TO SAID OFFICER’S EXPERT BAC ASSESSMENT  WHEN UNVERIFIED TESTIMONY BY HEARSAY, OR WHENEVER, SAID OFFICER DID NOT IN PERSON WITNESSED AND THEREBY CAN  UNDER OATH ATTEST TO DUI PROBABLE CAUSE, DUI  DEFENDANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL BEFORE AND AFTER HIS ARREST,  AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE, AND NOT BASED ON HEARSAY BY ANOTHER WITNESS AFTER THE FACT. THE APPELLANT WAS NOT WITNESSED DIRECTLY BY SAID ARRESTING DUI INSTANTER OFFICER  AS DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL ,  BUT WAS  MERELY ASSUMED SO BY THE DUI INSTANTER ARREST OFFICER BASED SOLELY ON HEARSAY BY THE ORIGINAL ARRESTING OFFICER WHO ARRESTED THE APPELLANT ON THE NIGHT OF APRIL 4TH, 2016 WITH NO PROBABLE CAUSE, JESSE SLAUGHTER.  A “NOTE” BY SAID OFFICER IN THE PROSECUTION FILE FOR SAID APPELLANT  COMPLETELY CONTRADICTS SLAUGHTERS  ALLEGED HEARSAY STATEMENTS REFERENCED IN INSTANTER DUI OFFENSE REPORT THAT SAME DATE BY BILLY CORLEY THAT THE APPELLANT ON SAID DATE WAS OBSERVED BY A THIRD PARTY DRIVING RECKLESSLY RUNNING SEVERAL CARS OFF THE ROAD- THIS WOULD BE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR DUI ARREST IF IT WERE VERIFIABLE AS TRUE BY BEING  IN PERSON WITNESSED BY BILLY CORLEY.  SUCH RECKLESS DRIVING IS AN INDICATOR OF BAC .231, THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT. BILLY CORLEY IN HIS COMPLETELY SPURIOUS TDPSHP DUI OFFENSE REPORT THAT EVENING ALSO SWEARS SLAUGHTER WHO IN HIS NOTE SAYS SOLELY THE APPELLANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN HIS LINE-THE 59 IS ONE WAY WITH NO YELLOW DIVIDING LINES-  NOT MAINTAINING THE LINE IS NOT A TRAFFIC OFFENSE  IN TEXAS- RE IPSO IGITUR, SALUGHTER ARRESTED THE APPELLANT FIRST THAT NIGHT WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE. MOREOVER, CORLEY QUOTING SLAUGHTER IN SAID COMPLETELY SPURIOUS DUI REPORT SWEARS SLAUGHTER WITNESSED THE APPELLANT AFTER HIS INITIAL FALSE ARREST WITH RED EYES AND THE SMELL OF ALCOHOL ON HIS BREATH BEHIND THE WHEEL.  SLAUGHTER’S NOT SAYS NO SUCH THING

THIS ALL MAKES  VALID ARGUMENT THAT THE ARRESTING FOR DUI OFFICER CAN NOT BE CALLED IN IF SAID OFFICER DID NOT HIMSELF STOP AND ARREST FIRST FOR PROBABLE CAUSE THE DUI SUSPECT WHO SAID OFFICER DID IN PERSON BEFORE, AND AFTER INITIAL ARREST WITNESS THE SUSPECT WITH PROBABLE CAUSE BEHIND THE WHEEL.  BAC TEST AND DUI ARREST OFFICER WITNESSING IN PERSON THE DUI SUSPECT DUI BEFORE AND OR AFTER ARREST DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL IN PERSON  IS NOT AN EITHER/OR AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE AND MOST CASES IN TEXAS, BUT A BOTH..AND, WITH THE ARRESTING DUI OFFICER WITNESSING IN PERSON AND SWEARING THEREBY PROBABLY CAUSE FOR DUI ARREST OF A SUBJECT SINE QUA NON FIRST AND FOREMOST IN RELATION TO THE BAC TEST RESULTS  IN TEXAS.  SUCH A SCENARIO ALLOWS AN ARRESTING DUI OFFICER TO SWEAR IN COURT IN DOING HIS DUTY THAT THE DUI DEFENDANT WAS DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL BY SAID OFFICER’S  OBSERVATION OF FACT IN PERSON TESTIMONY  TO THIS ELEMENT EVEN IF THE BAC TEST LEVEL REPORT’S -.O8 IN SAID CASE.

 

AS SUCH,  ALL AND EVERYONE IN TEXAS CONVICTED BY MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED TDPSCF LAB SPURIOUS  SELF CERTIFIED BAC TEST EVIDENCE OF DUI WITH NO CORROBORATING   TESTIMONY BY THE FIRST ARRESTING WITH PROBABLE CAUSE OFFICER   OF THE SUSPECT, THAT HE OR SHE WITNESSED IN PERSON  AND CAN THERE BY SWEAR  IN COURT,  THE DUI SUSPECT  WAS WITNESSED BY SAID FIRST ARRESTING WITH PROBABLE CAUSE DUI INSTANTER ISSUING OFFICER WAS AT ANYTIME BEFORE ARREST DUI AND OR BEHIND THE WHEEL OF THEIR VEHICLE INTOXICATED  BEYOND .08 BAC  AFTER ARREST WITH PROBABLE CAUSE,  HAS PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT THEREBY.

 

 

THE USE OF MANUFACTURED .231 BAC REPORT FOR FALSE 2016 DUI CONVICTION IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE TO FALSELY CONVICT HIM CONTRADICTED THE DUI PROBABLE CAUSE ON THE DUI OFFENSE REPORT BY TDPS HPO BILLY CORLEY THAT IN NO WAY SPECIFIED A .231 BAC LEVEL FOR THE APPELLANT IN THE REPORT.  USING THE FRAUDULENT BAC REPORT IN 100% OF DUI FALSE CONVICTIONS IN PLEA BARGAINING OR AT TRIAL BEGS THE QUESTION HOW DID OFFICERS  ARREST DUI SUSPECTS AND FAIRLY AND JUSTLY  CONVICT THEM WITH EVIDENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE BEFORE THE RELATIVELY RECENT REIGN OF DUI FALSE CONVICTION EXCLUSIVITY OF THE BAC TEST?

 

BAC TEST BLOOD SAMPLES IN VIOLATION OF THE 5TH AMENDMENT ARE BY FORCE TAKEN FOR MANUFACTURED BAC EVIDENCE BY THE POLICE IN 100% OF CASES OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AS SINE QUA NON IN THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S  DUI REVENUE FRAUD AND IS THE “BE ALL TO END ALL”  OF CURRENT MALICIOUS DUI PROSECUTION IN THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORTS OF MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED BAC TEST BLOOD SAMPLE  “EVIDENCE” DUI FALSE CONVICTION  EXCLUSIVITY  IS  THE FOUNDATION  OF THE CURRENT SYSTEMIC ALL ENCOMPASSING  DUI MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ,  AS SUCH VIA  COLOR OF LAW VIOLATION BY THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSIONERS  DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD SCAM ON ALL LEVEL’S OF DUI ENFORCEMENT VIA MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE TDPSCF LAB SELF VERIFIED BAC REPORT EXCLUSIVITY IN FALSELY CONVICTING ANY ONE IN TEXAS OF DUI.

 

SINE QUA NON, VIA THE  TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM  REVENUE FRAUD SCAM SUPPRESSED AS POSSIBLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE  BLOOD SAMPLES TRIGGERING THE MANIFESTLY SPURIOUS  TDPSFC LAB  BAC TEST IS TAKEN  UNDER DURESS AND IN VIOLATION  OF THE IVTH AND VTH AMENDMENT, AND THEREBY THE VITH AMENDMENT IN 100% OF TEXAS DUI PROSECUTION CASES, WITH NEVER AN EXCEPTION,  SINE QUA NON IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  EVEN IN SPITE OF  A SIGNED DIC -24  BAC BLOOD SAMPLE REFUSAL.

 

SAID SAME BLOOD SAMPLES WILL NEVER  BE RETESTED BY THE TDPSCF LAB, HARRIS COUNTY,  FOR JUSTICE SAKE WHEN SHOWN TO BE SUPPRESSED FOR A MONTH OR MORE IN THE STATE OF TEXAS AS POSSIBLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE, THEN SAID SAME SAMPLES AS A MERE PROP TRIGGER MANUFACTURED  AND CONTRIVED AND CONTRARY TO FACT TDPSCF LAB SELF CERTIFIED UNDERSIGNED BAC REPORTS  AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.   THERE BY  IN VIOLATION OF THE MICHAEL MORTON LAW IN EVERY DUI CONVICTION IN TEXAS.

AS SUCH, ANY ONE CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS THERE BY GAINS PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

THE MICHAEL MORTON LAW MUST BE HONORED DUI PROSECUTION IN EVERY CASE FOR LICIT DUI CONVICTION IN THE STATE OF TEXAS.

 

ANYONE CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS HAS BEEN BY TDPSCF LAB REFUSAL IN ALL DUI PROSECUTION  TO RETEST  FOR ANY REASON THEIR SELF CERTIFIED BAC TEST REPORT DISPUTED FOR  REASONABLE  CAUSE “IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND NOT SOLELY FOR CONVICTIONS” BY DUI DEFENDANT AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE, IS RES IPSO IGITUR AND THEREBY DENIED BY TDPSCF LAB REFUSAL TO RETEST SUPPRESSED BLOOD SAMPLES  AND MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE OF TDPSCF LAB  THEIR MICHAEL MORTON LAWS THEREBY PURSUANT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  AS SUCH, ANYONE CONVICTED OF DUI  IN TEXAS, GAINS PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

BLOOD SAMPLES MAILED TO TDPSFC LAB, HARRIS COUNTY, NOT  REFRIGERATED,  FIRST SUPPRESSED FOR A MONTH UNDER THE GUISE OF HARRIS COUNTY LAB BACKLOG, AS POTENTIALLY EXONERATING OF DUI , AND THEN TO TRIGGER AS  A  SPECIOUS PROP MANUFACTURED  EVIDENCE OF + .15 BAC EVIDENCED  BY  100% OF THE TDPSCF LAB SELF CERTIFYING BAC REPORT,  MUST, AND ARE, SINE QUA NON  IN 100% OF TDPSCF LAB  BAC REPORTS  REPORTED AT  ABOVE BAC + .15, OVER 95% AT  BAC .20 ,  SAID OVERWHELMING PREPONDERANCE OF BAC +.15-.20 + DUI EVIDENCED TDPSCF LAB REPORTS EVERY YEAR REPORTED, WITH NOT ONE -.O8 BAC  TDPSCF LAB REPORT ISSUED THAT THE APPELLANT KNOWS OF, OF PUBLIC RECORD, WITH THE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION OF JOHN LOVETT’S STILL NOT PUBLICIZED TDPSCF LAB BAC REPORT AT BAC OO.OO, OR LESS, THIS IS REPORTED IN 100% OF DUI PROSECUTIONS IN TEXAS TO FALSELY CONVICTED OF DUI, AND SINE QUA NON,  TO ASSURE AND TO PERPETUATE THE TDPSC DUI/POM REVENUE  FRAUD SCAM   WILL CONTINUE UNABATED BY LAW SUITS FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND NOT BE EXPOSED AS A FRAUD,  MAKING THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS  AND THEIR GOVERNMENT AND ORGANIZED CRIME CRONIES  CRIMINALLY AND CIVILLY LIABLE FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION FOR DUI IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD TO MILLIONS OF THEIR VICTIMS IN TEXAS.

ANYONE CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS THEREBY GAINS PLAINTIFF STANDING IN SAID CLASS ACTION SUIT.

 

ALL BAC REPORTS IN DUI PROSECUTION IN TEXAS ARE SUBJECT WITH PROBABLE CAUSE TO RETESTING PURSUANT OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW. 

 

IF  BAC REPORT BY AN INDEPENDENT LAB  IS BELOW .O8 THE SUSPECT MUST BE RELEASED, ABOVE  .O8 THE BAC REPORT MUST BE PLACED ON A PUBLIC WEBSITE WITHIN 24 HOURS WITH PERTINENT OFFENSE INFORMATION- DATE AND OFFENSE SITE- AND PLACE OF JAILING FOR OFFENSE.

 

ALL CONVICTIONS OF DUI/POM IN TEXAS PREMISED ON THE TDPSFC BAC TEST  AS EVIDENCE OF GUILT ARE FOR JUSTICE TO BE EXPUNGED FROM CRIMINAL RECORD OF ALL THOSE CONVICTED OF DUI IN TEXAS.

 

FORFEITURE OF LICENSE AND SURCHARGES WARRANTED BY THE  2003 SAFE DRIVING PROGRAM CANNOT BE LAWFULLY APPLIED TO TEXANS DEFRAUDED BY SAID DUI REVENUE FRAUD THROUGH FALSE CONVICTION AND SENTENCING.  MOREOVER, BY SAID LAW, ON LEGAL AND JUST DUI CONVICTION, SUSPENSION APPLIES ONLY TO CDL, NOT OTHER LICENSES, C,B.M  FOR REFUSAL, CONVICTION AND OTHER MOVING VIOLATIONS AND YET 95% OF THE MILLIONS  OF TEXAS LICENCES SUSPENDED SINCE 2003 BY THIS INHERENTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW HAVE BEEN OTHER THAN CDL, THAT IS CLASS B,C,M IN VIOLATION OF THE SET LEGAL PARAMETERS OF SAID LAW.  THE LICENSES MUST BY  SAID LAW AND BY THE CONSTITUTION BE RETURNED WITHOUT SURCHARGES  AND ALL SURCHARGES BE REPAID.

 

CLOSING STATEMENT:

 

THE  APPELLANT. AS ALL IN TEXAS MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTED BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, IN ALL SAID CASES  ESTOPPEL BY THE MAY 19TH MCC LAW 5 TO DISMISS  FOR JUSTICE COURT ORDER IS DENIED  UNDER COLOR OF LAW HIS VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT AND  EQUITABLE REDRESS FOR TIME FALSELY IMPRISONED AND HARM DONE BY SAID MAY 19TH COURT ORDER, DERIVING FROM FORBIDDEN FRUIT OF A POISONOUS TREE, ESTOPPEL CAUSE 2016 -215- SJCC,  TO FACE  HIS ACCUSERS (JOHN LOVETT AND AFTER THE FACT ACCOMPLICES)  IN A COURT OF LAW , AS  PLAINTIFF WITH EXONERATING SJC COURT LEGAL DOCUMENT EVIDENCE  IN  A  PUBLIC TRIAL WITH A JURISPRUDENTA  AND IMPARTIAL JUDGE AND JURY.   AS EXHIBITS 2 -5  DOCUMENT  – APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI INSTANTER AND TDPSHP DUI OFFENSE REPORT CORROBORATE  IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 STATE, A NON EXISTENT ARREST AND SEARCH SITE- MPM 450 I-59 SAN JACINTO COUNTY AS WELL AS DEC. 24TH, 2015 ON THE CAUSE NO: 2016-215 SJC COURT CRIMINAL COMPLAINT  AND SPURIOUS APRIL 6TH, 2017 PROBATION ORDER  BY JOHN LOVETT.  ADMIT NO CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING BY  JOHN LOVETT AS SJCC JUDGE IN APPELLANT’S SAID CAUSES, AND ACCOMPLICES OF THE SJCC  AND MCC BEFORE AND AFTER THE FACT OF THE APPELLANT’S FALSE APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI CONVICTION ON 2/23/17 SJCC IN ALL SAID ESTOPPEL AND SJCC CAUSE NO: 2016 -215-  , NOR CAN THE APPELLANT BE LITIGATED TO OR IS ANY PHYSICAL  EVIDENCE LIKE OPEN CONTAINER NOR  BAC BLOOD SAMPLE  IN VIOLATION OF tHE TEXAS rULES OF EVIDENCE,  LEGALLY ADMISSIBLE IN A COURT HEARING FROM NON EXISTENT DUI OFFENSE ARREST AND SEARCH CITES ON A DATE SAID DUI OFFENSE(DECEMBER 25,2015) DID NOT HAPPEN AS NOTED BY THE AB INITO DUI INSTANTER AND TDPSHPO DATE OF APRIL 4TH, 2016  .  RES IPSO IGITUR,  JOHN LOVETT AB INITIO AND ALL SJC AND MC JUDGES IN ESTOPPEL AB INITIO NEVER HAD CONSTITUTIONAL/STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING AS SJCC OR MCC IN ESTOPPEL JUDGE, RENDERING ALL PLEADING, HEARING, TRIAL, CONVICTION, AND SENTENCING, WARRANTS, PROBATION, FINES, AND CRIMINAL RECORD NULL AND VOID AB INITIO AND MISTRIAL.

 

LOVETT, AS PERSONA SOL  DERIVED  NO JUDICIAL STANDING IN SAID CAUSE NO. 2016 -215- AS SJCC JUDGE FROM A FALLACIOUS DUI  OFFENSE SITE, 450 MPM I 59, SJC, AND STATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT DUI OFFENSE DATE,  CHRISTMAS EVE, DECEMBER 24TH, 2015 (CHANGED IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001  BY LOVETT AND  SJCC ACCOMPLICES  FROM APRIL 4TH, 2016 AS AN ANTI CATHOLIC SLUR TO DEFAME THE MORAL INTEGRITY OF THE APPELLANT AS A CATHOLIC PRIEST AND PREJUDICE THE JURY BY DEFAMING THE APPELLANT AS A ROGUE CATHOLIC PRIEST DRUNK OUT OF HIS MIND AT THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT, BAC.231,  ON CHRISTMAS  EVE  RECKLESS RUNNING SEVERAL MOTORISTS OF THE ROAD AND ALMOST STRIKING A MOTORIST ON THE 59 BEFORE BEING STOPPED FROM ALMOST KILLING SOMEONE ALLEGEDLY.  THEREBY  IN VIOLATION OF TEXAS RULE OF EVIDENCE 404  PURSUANT OF  FALSELY CONVICTING THE APPELLANT  BY PERJURY  BEFORE A LIED TO JURY BY THE JUDGE AND PROSECUTION, WITHOUT THE APPELLANT’S KNOWLEDGE IN ABSENTIA  BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  USING THE SJCC TO PERPETRATE AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME UNDER COLOR OF LAW IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANT’S 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS UTILIZING  CRIMINAL ELEMENTS OF A TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY  COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD SCAM AS THE CONTEXT. RES IPSO, IGITUR  LOVETT,  BY SAID TDPS COMMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD SCAM DEFRAUDING AND HARMING THE APPELLANT PERPETRATED SAID FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS  WHILE SPECIOUSLY MASQUERADING  AS SJCC JUDGE HAVING NO JUDICIAL STANDING  WHILE IMPERSONATING  SJCC JUDGE IN SAID CAUSE NO: 2016 -215- AS DID ALL MC COURT ACTING AS JUDGES IN ALL SAID ESTOPPEL  AFTER THE FACTO DO.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR,  AS PERSONA SOL,  ONLY A LEGAL PERSON, LOVETT UNLAWFULLY ORDERED AS SJCC JUDGE  APRIL 6TH, 2017 INVALID AND DELICT  EXTRADITION WARRANT FOR THE APPELLANT’S FALSE  ARREST RE: 2016, APRIL 4TH  DUI/ FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT  RE: THE APPELLANT’S UNLAWFUL FEB. 23RD 2017  IN ABSENTIA TRIAL AND FALSE CONVICTION BY JURY WITH MANUFACTURE EVIDENCE OF BAC .231 RES IPSO ENHANCED TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR, ALL FRUITS OF A POISONOUS TREE, THE TREE OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF AN ANTI  CATHOLIC HATE  AGAINST THE APPELLANT AB INITIO IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

THE APPELLANT PRO SE  BY SAID NULL AND VOID UNCONSTITUTIONAL MISTRIAL, AND ALL SAID ESTOPPEL MC COURT HEARING AND TRIA IS DENIED  BY JOHN LOVETT AS PERSONA SOL PRESIDING, AS WELL AS MC COURT ACTING AS JUDGES, WAYNE MACK, PAUL DAMICO IN SAID ESTOPPEL HEARINGS AS PERSONA SOL PRESIDING , IS DENIED HIS VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT AB INITIO  BY THE SJCC  AND MCC THEREBY IN SAID CAUSE AND ESTOPPEL AFTER THE FACT, TRIED AND CONVICTED IN ABSENTIA ON SAID DATE 2/23/17 SJCC IN AB SENTIA WITHOUT FOREKNOWLEDGE AND RATIFICATION, RES IPSO, IGITUR  DENIED THE VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT BY ALL SAID ESTOPPEL MCC JUDGES AND SJCC JUDGES TO FACE ACCUSERS (JOHN LOVETT AND SJCC AND TDPS ACCOMPLICES IN A COURT OF LAW  IN A FAIR AND JUST  PUBLIC TRIAL PRESIDED OVER BY A NON PARTIAL AND NOT RELIGIOUSLY BIGOTED  JUDGE  AND JURY, SAID JUDGE HAVING  CONSTITUTIONAL, STATE, DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING AS SJCC  OR MCC JUDGE RE: CAUSE NO: 2016 -215-

 

MOREOVER, JOHN LOVETT, ACTING AS PERSONA SOL, WITH NO CONSTITUTIONAL STANDING ( EVIDENCE PROVES)  WAS TIMELY SERVED 2/23/17 BY THE SAID SAME THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE IN SJCC CAUSE 2016-215,  A MOTION RES IPSO IGITUR OF DISQUALIFICATION OF A JUDGE-WITH FACTUAL BASIS (EXHIBIT 13)  PENDING CERTIFICATION OF GOVERNOR GREG ABBOTT.  LOVETT  DISMISSED  AND DISAVOWED WITHOUT DUE DILIGENCE AND PROCESS SAID TIMELY SUBMITTED MOTION OF DISQUALIFICATION OF A JUDGE  AB INITIO TRIGGERED  BY LOVETT’S  JANUARY 9TH, 2017  SJCC DISCOVERY COURT VIOLATION OF THE THEN DEFENDANT PRO SE  2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHT TO RETEST A  SELF EVIDENTLY FRAUDULENT TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI REVENUE FRAUD  .231 BAC TDPSFC LAB REPORT, WITH OUT A PRE TRAIL HEARING,  ON 2/23/17 USED AS ENHANCING EVIDENCE TO FALSELY CONVICT THE APPELLANT OF 1ST DUI, BAC + .15, A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR.

 

SAID 2/23/17 MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JOHN LOVETT AS JUDGE  PRESCIND  ALL MOTIONS AND ORDERS BY SAID SJCC BENCH PENDING SUSTAINED AND CERTIFIED  JUDICIAL STANDING AND/OR  BY GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, TC A5. CERTIFIED JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION OR RECUSAL BY JUDGE,   RESOLVED EQUITABLY AND JUSTLY AND CERTIFIED BY TEXAS CONSTITUTION BY GOVERNOR GREG ABBOTT.  MOREOVER, LOVETT IN DISMISSING SAID MOTION AND THE GOVERNOR’S CERTIFICATION, SPECIOUSLY  DID NOT INFORM A PEER JUDGE ABOUT SAID MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PER ADJUDICATION,  A VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, OF SAID MOTION TO DISQUALIFY.  LOVETT   BY T.C. SECTION 5 MUST FIRST  CONSULT A JUDGE PEER TO RESOLVE  SAID MOTION  BEFORE GOING TO  TRIAL RE: CAUSE 2016-215, IN SPITE OF THE APPELLANT’S  VITH AMENDMENT AND FRANKLY HUMAN RIGHTS,  CONSULTED  A PEER JUDGE  SOLELY AND EXCLUSIVELY ON (COURT RECORDS OF PROCEEDINGS THAT DAY WERE SAID TO BE UNAVAILABLE TO THE APPELLANT BY THE DISTRICT COUNTY CLERK FOR UNKNOWN REASONS WHEN APPELLANT ATTEMPTED TO ASCERTAIN THE NAME OF THIS PEER JUDGE A VIOLATION OF DEFENDANT’S RIGHT TO A PUBLIC TRIAL OF COURT RECORD)   THE FEASIBILITY OF TRYING APPELLANT PRO SE IN CAUSE NO. 2016-215- SJCC IN ABSENTIA.

 

JOHN LOVETT , UNLAWFULLY DISAVOWING SAID MOTION TO DISQUALIFY LOVETT AS SJCC JUDGE RE: 2016-215-DID THEN VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE CRIMINAL CONTEXT OF TDPS COMMISSIONERS’ DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD  FALSELY CONVICT  2/23/17 IN SJCC  THE APPELLANT  IN PERPETRATING  AGAINST SAID APPELLANT SAID ANTI-CATHOLIC HATE CRIME IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE TDPSC  DUI REVENUE FRAUD SCAM IN CONSPIRACY WITH SJCC ACCOMPLICES  ASS. DA CHRISTINA T. WOOD, AND JOHN BOEMIO, WITH MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE BE IT BAC .231 SWORN TO UNDER OATH AT SAID MISTRIAL TRIAL BY TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY HARRIS COUNTY FORENSIC LABORATORY BAC TECHNICIAN SCIENTIST RACHEL AUBEL. THE RESULTS OF ABEL’S TDPSFCLAB BAC. .213 REPORT COMPILED  IN MAY 2016 (THIS BAC .231. REPORT DATE MAKES IMPOSSIBLE THE DECEMBER 24, 2015 OFFENSE DATE ON THE STATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT UNDERSIGNED BY ASS DA CHRISTINA WOOD AGAINST THE APPELLANT AS WELL AS THE SAME SAID DATE OF OFFENSE ON LOVETT’S UNLAWFUL APRIL 6TH, 2017 SENTENCING AND ORDER OF PROBATION IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001) ARE CONTRADICTED BY THE DUI PROBABLE CAUSE REPORT OF TDPS HPO BILLY CORLEY’S BAC DUI PROBABLY CAUSE DESCRIPTION, APRIL 4TH, 2016 OF THE APPELLANT’S .231 INDICATIVE BAC BEHAVIOR THAT DOES NOT ATTEST TO BAC .231 LEVEL OF IMPAIRMENT OF THE APPELLANT TO THE .231 BAC DEGREE. I.E. ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT OF .O8.   MOREOVER,  THE TOTALITY OF  CORLEY’S APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI TDPSHPO OFFENSE REPORT,  CORLEY SWORE TO AS STATE WITNESS IN FALSELY CONVICTING  THE APPELLANT  2/23/17 IS  FALLACIOUS IN ALL DETAILS AND SELF- CONTRADICTORY IN EVERY FACT.

 

EXCEPTING  ONE  FALLACIOUS BAC. .231 LEVEL IDENTIFIABLE BEHAVIOR CORLEY ATTRIBUTED TO THE APPELLANT CORLEY FALSELY ATTRIBUTED TO JESSE SLAUGHTER TESTIMONY AT THE NON EXISTENT MPM 450 I-59 , APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI ARREST SITE,   AS EVIDENCE OF DUI ON APRIL 4, 2016 , GIVEN AS VERBAL TESTIMONY AGAINST THE APPELLANT AS A SWORN WITNESS OF THE ARRESTING OFFICER, SJC DEP. JESSE SLAUGHTER, CORLEY  SWORE QUOTING WHAT ARRESTING OFFICER JESSE SLAUGHTER TESTIFIED TO HIM AT THE ARREST SITE AFTER THE APPELLANT’S ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLY CAUSE AND AFTER THE FACT AT THE TIME CORLEY ARRIVED AT MPM 450 i-59, ON APRIL 4TH, 2016 OFFENCE REPORT, THAT APPELLANT DRIVING RECKLESSLY (THIS WOULD BE AN ELEMENT CONSISTENT WITH BAC.231 INDICATORS IF THIS REPORT WAS INDEED FACTUAL AND VERIFIED AND NOT CONTRADICTORY) DROVE SEVERAL VEHICLES OFF THE ROAD MOMENTS BEFORE THE APPELLANT  WAS WAS RUN OFF THE ROAD BY SLAUGHTER INTO A CONSTRUCTION AREA AND FALSELY ARRESTED WITHOUT PROBABLY CAUSE, NOR WAS THIS .231 BAC INDICATOR ATTRIBUTED AS TESTIMONY INCRIMINATING THE APPELLANT OF DUI  EVER STATED BY SLAUGHTER IN AN OFFICIAL POLICE REPORT OR CITATION, BUT RATHER WAS NOT MENTIONED IN SLAUGHTER’S NOTORIOUS STATE PROSECUTION FILE.  What CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBE AS “A NOTE’ BY SLAUGHTER, NOT A PROBABLE CAUSE FOR STOP AND ARREST REPORT IN ANY WAY, NOT A CITATION FROM THE TIME FOR RECKLESS DRIVING BEFORE THE TIME OF THE APPELLANT’S STOP AND ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE, IN THE STATE’S PROSECUTION FILE FOR CAUSE NO.2016 -215- DOES NOT STATE THE APPELLANT DRIVING RECKLESSLY DROVE SEVERAL VEHICLES OFF THE ROAD ALMOST “STRIKING A MOTORIST” ACCORDING TO CORLEY’S TDPSHPO QUOTING SLAUGHTER’S SPOKEN TESTIMONY, BUT IN SLAUGHTER’S NOTE   SLAUGHTER SIMPLY AND MERELY OBSERVED THE  APPELLANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN HIS LINE .  FAILING TO MAINTAIN ONE’S LINE AND EVEN NEARLY MISSING A MOTOR VEHICLE IS NOT A TRAFFIC VIOLATION IN TEXAS. NOR IS SAID DRIVING BEHAVIOR EXCLUSIVELY INDICATIVE OF BAC TO THE . 231.    IF SLAUGHTER TESTIFIED SO AS CORLEY SAID SLAUGHTER  TESTIFIED,  AND WOULD AGAIN TESTIFY TO IN SJCC AS A CORROBORATING     WITNESS NAMED AS SO ON CORLEY’S TDHPO DUI OFFENSE REPORT THE APPELLANT ON THE EVENING OF APRIL 4TH, 2017 IN  RECKLESS OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE CONSISTENT WITH A BAC  .231 WHY DID SLAUGHTER NOT DO HIS SWORN DUTY AND CITE AND RECORD IN A PROBABLE CAUSE ARREST REPORT THESE MULTIPLE TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS OF RECKLESS DRIVING AND SEVERAL SERIAL MOTORIST ENDANGERMENT INDICATIVE OF BAC. 231 INSTEAD OF SUBMITTING A NON OFFICIAL “NOTE”  AFTER THE FACT.

 

RES IPSO IGITUR,   THE APPELLANT’S VTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED UNDER COLOR OF LAW AB INITIO BY SLAUGHTER WHO HAVING FIRST HIMSELF RECKLESSLY DROVE THE APPELLANT OFF THE HIGHWAY,  DID NOT CITE  HIM IN ANYWAY OR FILE A PROBABLE CAUSE AND ARREST REPORT, ONLY AN INNOCUOUS “NOTE” WHICH DOES NOT CORROBORATE SAID TESTIMONY BY SLAUGHTER TO CORLEY IN CORLEYS TDPSO REPORT  INCRIMINATING THE APPELLANT THAT EVENING DRIVING SEVERAL VEHICLES OF THE ROAD, ET. AL,

 

THERE ARE NO   OTHER SPECIFIED INDICATORS  OF THE APPELLANT IN CUSTODY EXHIBITING BEHAVIOR  BAC .231: THESE SPECIFIC BAC AT .231- ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT  ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD BAC CHART :  A COMPLETE LOSS OF NORMAL MENTAL AND PHYSICAL CAPACITY. CORLEY AT APPELLANT’S BEHEST, IN A FURTIVE ATTEMPT BY THE APPELLANT AT THIS JUNCTURE TO ASSERT HIS VTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, ASKED THE APPELLANT IF HE WOULD SIGN A WRITTEN BAC REFUSAL. THE APPELLANT REPLIED ABSOLUTELY AND SIGNED HIS NAME. CORLEY  AT THIS TIME, AS REQUIRED BY LAW, DID NOT AT THAT TIME READ THE DIC 24 TO THE APPELLANT.  ALL SAID REASONABLE AND COMPREHENDED COMMUNICATION OF BAC REFUSAL  AND A LEGALLY BINDING SIGNING OF THE BAC REFUSAL FORM AT BAC .231 IS NOT POSSIBLE AND THEREFORE VALID LEGALLY.  RES IPSO, IGITUR, THE SIGNING OF THE REFUSAL  VIEWED BY TDPS AS A CONFESSION AND GUILTY PLEA AT .231 BAC IS NULL AND VOID DUE TO LOSS OF MENTAL CAPACITY.   IF INDEED CORLEY  WAS PROFESSIONALLY  TRAINED TO IDENTIFY ACCURATELY TO THE FURTHEST  DEGREES OF .231  BAC IMPAIRMENT AND COMPETENTLY COULD AND DID SO – AND CORLEY AT NO TIME WITNESSED THE APPELLANT DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL OF HIS VEHICLE BEFORE OR AFTER HIS ARREST –  ASSESSED THE APPELLANT IN HIS LEGAL JUDGEMENT AS A TDPSHPO AT BAC .231 (IN FACT, CORLEY’S  TENDERING TO BE  SIGNED BAC  REFUSAL AND READING OF THE DIC 24, WHICH CORLEY IN CONTRADICTION OF  PREVIOUS DUI OFFENSE REPORT NUMBERS SAID AT. NO. 14 HE READ TO THE APPELLANT THE DIC 24 -WHICH CORLEY AT NO TIME AFTER THE APPELLANT’S ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE EVER READ- STATES IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 CORLEY READ TO THE DUI DEFENDANT IMMEDIATELY BEFORE CORLEY TOOK THE APPELLANT IN CUSTODY INTO CHI-ST.LUKES ) WOULD HAVE BEEN BY THE FACT CORLEY JUDGED THE APPELLANT AT THAT MOMENT AT. .231 BAC IMPAIRMENT INCAPABLE OF RESPONSE AN ABSURD ACTION ON CORLEY’S PART, IN ALLEGED EXPERT ASSESSMENT OF THE APPELLANT AT .231 BAC LEVEL, I.E. IN COMPLETE LOSS OF MENTAL AND PHYSICAL CAPACITY AND THE BAC SIGNED REFUSAL CONFUSION LEGALLY NULL AND VOID THEREBY.

 

IF CORLEY HAD OBSERVED IN REALITY THE APPELLANT AT .231 BAC  CONSENT AND THE TENDERING OF A SIGNED REFUSAL, ALL SAID ABOVE BY TEXAS BAC LAW IS UNNECESSARY AND UNWARRANTED BY TEXAS BAC CONSENT LAW.  AT .231 BAC, TEXAS BAC LAW DOES NOT ALLOW FOR WRITTEN REFUSAL (INVALID BECAUSE OF BAC  TOTAL IMPAIRMENT OF MENTAL CAPACITY. MOREOVER, TEXAS LAW AT .231  ALLOWS AND MANDATES THE TAKING OF BAC BLOOD SAMPLES WITHOUT CONSENT FROM “INCAPACITATED” DUI SUSPECTS AT .231, WELL,  INJURED, OR DEAD. At BAC .231

 

CORLEY ELECTED FREELY TO  CONDUCT A SUI GENERIS  FIELD SOBRIETY TEST  IN THE APPELLANT’S RECOLLECTION OF THE DUI SUSPECT   NOT CORRESPONDING  TO THE TDPS  MANUEL DUI FIELD SOBRIETY TEST PARADIGM OF THE TDPSHP.  BE THAT AS IT MAY,  AT .231 BAC , A PROPER FIELD SOBRIETY TEST  IS  NOT POSSIBLE FOR THE DUI SUSPECT BAC. 231  TO REASONABLE COMPREHEND AND PHYSICALLY BEGIN AND TO COMPLETE.  WHY IF CORLEY PROFESSIONALLY AND COMPETENTLY ASSESSED THE APPELLANT AT .213 BAC   WAS THE FST ADMINISTERED THEREFORE AB INITO. THE APPELLANT, NONETHELESS, – ALTHOUGH  FRAUDULENTLY ADMINISTERED-BY CORLEY-COMPLETED AND SCORED POINTS ON FST, NOT A POSSIBILITY AT BAC. 231/

 

A PRIME BAC.231 INDICATOR IS BLACK OUT AND LOSS OF MEMORY.  THE APPELLANT DURING ALMOST FOUR HOURS OF CUSTODY DID NOT BLACK OUT OR EVER LOOSE MEMORY OF HIS FALSE ARREST FOR DUI BY CORLEY AND NOW AT THIS VERY MOMENT THE APPELLANT’S FALSE JAILING IN VIOLATION OF  THE APPELLANT’S CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW ON APRIL 4TH, 2016, THE APPELLANT PROTESTED CONTINUALLY TO CORLEY  ABOUT IN HIS  CUSTODY.  CORLEY IN HIS OFFENSE REPORT DOES NOT REPORT THE APPELLANT BLACK OUT , AND AWAKENING EXPERIENCING A LOSS OF RECENT  MEMORY.

 

INCONTINENCE IS A PRIME INDICATOR OF BAC. 231. CORLEY IN HIS DUI OFFENSE REPORT DOES NOT REPORT THE APPELLANT AS INCONTINENT AT ANY TIME OVER A FOUR HOUR PERIOD IN CUSTODY

.

THE LACK OF ANY PRIME INDICATORS OF BAC. 231 MANIFEST ON APRIL 4TH, 2016 IN THE APPELLANT SWORN TO IN CORLEY’S TDPSHP DUI OFFENSE REPORT IN CONTRADICTION TO THE TDPSCF LAB REPORT UNDERSIGNED BY TDPSCF LAB BAC TECHNICIAN AT BAC. 231  SPURIOUSLY ATTRIBUTED TO THE APPELLANT AND AGAIN SWORN TO BY RACHEL AUBEL TO BE “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL”  IN THE SJCC BEFORE LOVETT, ACTING AS JUDGE, PERSONA SOL, TO CONVICT FALSELY VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION THE APPELLANT ON 2/23/17 OF AN ENHANCED THERE BY TO CLASS A MISDEMEANOR 1ST DUI OFFENSE DENYING THEREBY  1ST DUI DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION TO THE APPELLANT AB INITO,

SHOWS THAT THAT BOTH BAC LEVEL REPORTS SWORN TO IN A COURT OF LAW ARE MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY AND RES IPSO, IGITUR MUTUALLY  UNTRUE, NOT PROFESSIONALLY OR SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIED, AND AS SUCH TDPS MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE AND SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE (THE .231 BAC) EXONERATING THE APPELLANT VIA MALICIOUS PROSECUTION EMPLOYED TO FALSE CONVICT AND JAIL THE APPELLANT IN COMMISSION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME IN THE CONTEXT OF TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

THE APPELLANT ALLEGES THE BAC. 231 TEST RESULT ON AUBELS SAID BAC REPORT ASSIGNED TO THE APPELLANT,  IN NO  MANNER WAS ACTUALLY DERIVED FROM THE APPELLANT’S BLOOD SAMPLES PIRATED UNDER DURESS AT CHI ST. LUKES, LIVINGSTON TEXAS BY  CARDINAL  DINARDO’S  CRONIES IN THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. SAID BAC TEST WAS NEVER ACTUALLY PREFORMED BY AUBEL AND THE RESULTS UNDERSIGNED BY AUBEL TO BE “99.7 CONFIDENCE LEVEL.”

 

TO THE CONTRARY,  THE BAC. 23I, THE HIGHEST BAC LEVEL ON THE STANDARD BAC CHART, WAS MALICIOUSLY AND ARBITRARILY BRANDED ON THE APPELLANT IN SAID SPURIOUS TDPSFC LAB REPORT UNDERSIGNED AND SWORN  TO IN A COURT OF LAW  BY AUBEL,  A VIOLENT AND CYNICAL, IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P  REVENUE FRAUD, ATTACK ON THE APPELLANT FOR MAKING VERBAL DEFENSE UNDER FALSE ARREST PURSUANT OF THE 1ST AMENDMENT VOICING THE APPELLANT’S CIVIL AND GENEVA CONVENTION RIGHTS ARE VIOLATED BY THE PIRATING OF HIS BLOOD UNDER DURESS AT CHI ST. LUKES BY ALL SAID CRONIES OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE/FRAUD.

 

AWARE,  UNDERSTANDING WITH 100% SCIENTIFICALLY BY HIS PERFECTLY HEALTHY LIVER, SAID .231 BAC TEST SPURIOUS REPORT TRIGGERED BY THE APPELLANT’S PIRATED BLOOD SAMPLES ON APRIL 4, 2016 AT CHI-ST. LUKES SAID TO BE BAC. .231, THE HIGHEST BAC DESIGNATION ON THE STANDARD BAC CHART, AND ALMOST THREE TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT OF .O8 WAS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT MALICIOUSLY CONTRIVED AND FALLACIOUS, THE APPELLANT MADE MOTION FOR A SJCC ORDER BY LOVETT IN HEARING TO RETEST SAID FALLACIOUS MALICIOUS .231 BAC REPORT PURSUANT “OF JUSTICE AND NOT ONLY CONVICTION” IN ACCORD WITH THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW.

 

THE APPELLANT, WAS UNLAWFULLY DENIED HIS MICHAEL MORTON LAW RIGHTS  BY LOVETT  IN DISCOVERY COURT, JANUARY 9TH,  TO HAVE A SAID TDPSCF LAB REPORT BAC .231 RE TESTED  FOR PROBABLE CAUSE OF FOUL PLAY FOR SAID SAME REASONS OF NO PRIME INDICATORS OF BAC. 231 IN CORLEY’S REPORTS, RETESTED  BY TDPSFC  .231 BAC REPORT UNDER SIGNER  BY RACHEL AUBEL,   CORLEY’S APRIL 4TH, 2016 DUI OFFENSE REPORT CORROBORATES  THE APPELLANT WAS NOT AT .231 BAC THE EVENING OF APRIL 4, 2017 AS BOTH CORLEY AND AUBEL IN CONJUNCTION WITH ASS DA CHRISTINA WOODS SWORE TO UNDER OATH IN SJCC IN MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTING THE APPELLANT AND FALSELY CONVICTING HIM OF 1ST DUI  ENHANCED BY BAC +  .15 CLASS A MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT OF COMMISSION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC  HATE CRIME AGAINST THE APPELLANT.

 

BILLY CORLEY  IN VIOLATION OF FCC 1001 SWEARS TDPS DUIOFFENSE REPORT AT NO. 14, CORLEY READ SAID APPELLANT THE DIC 24 RIGHT BEFORE ENTERING CHI-ST.LUKE. A  SELF CONTRADICTION.   CHRONOLOGICALLY,  CORLEY TRANSPORT THE APPELLANT IN LENGTHY CUSTODY TO CHI-ST. LUKES AFTER HE FIRST SIGNED A WRITTEN BAC REFUSAL. CORLEY STATES ONLY AT THE MOMENT BEFORE ENTERING CHI-ST.LUKE- FOR WHAT INTENDED PURPOSE IN THE FIRST PLACE- DID HE READ THE APPELLANT THE DIC -24 AND TENDERED THE REFUSAL DOCUMENT THAT THE APPELLANT HAD ALREADY SIGNED.  CORLEY AT THAT TIME OR AT ANY TIME, VIOLATING THE APPELLANTS DIC 24 RIGHTS  NEVER READ SAID DOCUMENT EVER TO THE APPELLANT.    AS A RESULT, APPELLANT WAS NEVER INFORMED AT ANYTIME BY CORLEY  HE WOULD LOSE HIS LICENSE IN AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL CIVIL PROCESS, THE TDPS LSP AN ELEMENT OF THE TDPS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD,  AS AN IMMEDIATE PENALTY FOR  SIGNED BAC REFUSAL, CONSIDERED A CONFESSION BY  TDPS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P FRAUD.  THEREBY, THE APPELLANT WAS  DENIED HIS  RIGHT BY NOT BEING READ THE DIC-24  BY SAID LAW TO A HEARING  WITHIN 15 DAYS TO GET HIS LICENSE BACK

 

MOST IMPORTANTLY ALL SAME SAID DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL PERPETRATING THE TDPSC DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD AGAINST THE APPELLANT WOULD VIOLENTLY SEIZE UNDER DURESS THE APPELLANTS  BLOOD IN SPITE OF THE APPELLANT HAVING  WILLINGLY SIGNED A DOCUMENTED  BAC REFUSAL WITHOUT FIRST BEING READ THE DIC -24. . If CORLEY, AS HE STATED IN NO. 14 DID IN TRUTH EVER READ THE DIC -24 TO THE APPELLANT AND  MADE THE APPELLANT AWARE AT ALLEGEDLY BAC .231 OF ALL THE ABOVE, WHAT MOTIVATION, WHEN RESISTANCE IS FUTILE, WOULD  THE APPELLANT REASONABLE  ENTERTAIN TO SIGN THE BAC REFUSAL ONLY TO LOOSE HIS LICENSE IN DOING SO FOR 180 DAYS- THE APPELLANT NOT READ  DIC 24 COULD NOT KNOW HE WOULD LOOSE HIS LICENSE FOR SIGNED BAC TEST SAMPLE REFUSAL. AND MOST SHOCKINGLY,  THE APPELLANT DID NOT KNOW  HIS BLOOD WOULD BE PIRATED IN SPITE OF  SIGNED BAC REFUSAL NEVERTHELESS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

EVERY WORD IN CORLEY’S REPORT IS FALLACIOUS AND CONTRADICTORY TO THE FACTS AND TRUE OCCURRENCE OF EVENTS IN NUMEROUS VIOLATIONS OF FCC 1001.

AS SUCH, THE APPELLANT’S LICENCES, C/M/ AND LIVELIHOOD CDL WERE ARE ARE UNJUSTLY CONFISCATED AT THIS TIME CRIMINALLY BY THE TDPSHPO BILLY CORLEY, IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD. THIS IN TURN LED TO THE APPELLANT BEING FALSELY CONVICTED BY JURY ON MARCH 13TH, 2017 OF DRIVING WITH SUSPENDED LICENSE, THEREBY, IN THE MC JUSTICE COURT ACTING AS JUDGE WAYNE MACK, PERSONA SOL WITH FRUITS FROM A POISONOUS TREE RE:SJCC 2016 -215-.

 

MOREOVER, JUDGE EARNEST MCCONNEL, PERSONA SOL, WITH NO JUDICIAL STANDING FOR SAID SAME FACTUAL GROUNDS DISQUALIFYING LOVETT AS SJCC JUDGE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE RE:SJCC 2016 -215- , AT 11:00 PM  APRIL 4TH, 2016,  CALLED IN BY CORLEY TO CARDINAL DANIEL DINARDO’S CHI-ST. LUKE HOSPITAL IN LIVINGSTON, TEXAS,  DID WITHOUT JUDICIAL STANDING AND AGAINST THE APPELLANT’S SIGNED REFUSAL,  OBSERVING DIRECTLY AND SPEAKING TO SAID APPELLANT AND HEARING ONLY THE FALLACIOUS TESTIMONY BASED SOLELY ON  HEARSAY OF JESSE SLAUGHTER OF BILLY CORLEY NOT ADMITTING TO ANY PROBABLE CAUSE THE APPELLANT WAS AT BAC .231 DUI BEHIND THE WHEEL WITH NO VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF BAC .231 IN FACING THE APPELLANT IN CUSTODY, WITH THERE BY,   NO VISIBLE OR VERBAL PROBABLY CAUSE THE APPELLANT WAS AT THAT MOMENT AT .231 BAC,  DID ORDER WITHOUT PROBABLY CAUSE OF BAC .231  A BLOOD WARRANT TO UNLAWFULLY SEIZE THE APPELLANT’S BLOOD AND  DID THEREBY VIOLATE UNDER COLOR OF LAW PURSUANT OF THE TDPS DUI/POM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION  FRAUD REVENUE, THE APPELLANT’S I. IVTH. VTH, VI, VIII, XVIII, AND XXI AMENDMENT RIGHTS BY SAID INVALID DELICT BLOOD WARRANT ON APRIL 4TH, 2016, IN CONSPIRACY AND COMPLICITY TO COMMIT SAID FRAUD  WITH CHI-LUKE  LINKED TDPS BAC FRAUDULENT TESTING COMPLICIT GUIDELINES CODIFIED AND SANCTIONED BY CARDINAL DANIEL DANARDO IN CAPACITY AS MEDICAL ETHICS AND POLICY DIRECTOR OF CHI-ST.LUKES, LIVINGSTON AND CORPORATE EXCUTIVE PARTNER CHI-ST. LUKES.

 

 

 

IN CONCLUSION:

 

SAID MOTION TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE  ONLY SAID CHARGES OF DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID AN ESTOPPEL CAUSE NO 2016-215- ORDERED BY ACTING AS JUDGE  DAMICO ON MAY 19TH, 2017 LAW 5, WAS NOT PRESENTED TO APPELLANT PRO SE NOR RATIFIED BY SAID APPELLANT IN A TIMELY AND REQUIRED MANNER,  RENDERING SAID MOTION AND SUBSEQUENT COURT ORDER NULL AND VOID.

 

THE VIOLATION OF APPELLANT’S VIIITH AMENDMENT RIGHT- EXCESSIVE BAIL- FOR A SPECIOUS, SPURIOUS VIOLATION OF DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION BY LOVETT, CAUSED SAID APPELLANT TO BE FALSELY JAILED VIA EXCESSIVE BAIL. SAID MAY 19TH MOTION FOR JUSTICE AND MC COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL  IS IN FACT UNJUST AND A VIOLATION OF APPELLANT’S VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT’S  TO BE EXONERATED BY SJC COURT DOCUMENT EVIDENCE IN HAND AT HEARING TO PLEAD INNOCENT, TO CONFRONT HIS ACCUSERS (JOHN LOVETT AND ACCOMPLICES) IN A COURT OF LAW   PRESIDED OVER BY AN IMPARTIAL AND NOT RELIGIOUSLY BIGOTED JUDGE WITH CONSTITUTIONAL/ STATE/DISTRICT JUDICIAL STANDING. AND AT ANY TIME DURING HEARING IN COURT TO MAKE MOTIONS, AND FIRST AND FOREMOST, MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL CHARGES, SENTENCING, SANCTIONS, PROBATION, ET. ALL AND EXPUNGE RECORD PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

 

SAID MAY 19TH  DELICT MOTION TO DISMISS  FOR JUSTICE AND COURT ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE  IS A COVER UP RUSE BY  M.C.SHERRIFF DEPARTMENT AND MC. COURT LAW FIVE  OF SAID COURT AND LAW ENFORCEMENT MALFEASANCE IN FALSELY ARRESTING, JAILING, AND DENYING IN SAID COVER UP RUSE APPELLANT’S  RIGHT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO  A FAIR  AND PUBLIC TRIAL AS PLAINTIFF AGAINST HIS FALSE ACCUSERS.  THE MAY 19TH MOCK MOTION AND COURT ORDER IS THE  SECOND INSTANCE OF JUDICIAL  MALFEASANCE  SAID SAME MC DEPARTMENT AND COURT AND JUDGE DISAVOWING  DUE DILIGENCE AFTER BEING TOLD IN PERSON AND IN A COURT OF LAW  IN HEARING BY APPELLANT ON MARCH 14TH, 2017 IN VIOLATION OF THE APPELLANTS TRANSPORTATION RIGHTS,  JOHN LOVETT HAD ISSUED IN MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SAID  WARRANT APRIL 6TH FOR THE APPELLANT ‘S ARREST AND EXTRADITION TO SJC  JAIL TO SERVE  365 DAYS, THE LEGAL MAXIMUM, WITHOUT PROBATION, SENTENCED IN ABSENTIA  UNLAWFULLY BY LOVETT  TO TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT.

 

BY SAID DELICT WARRANT, THE APPELLANT WAS  FALSELY ARREST AFTER TRAIL ON MARCH 13TH, 2017, IMMEDIATELY AFTER BEING FALSELY CONVICTED  FOR DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID IN SAID MC COURT, , AND ESTOPPEL OF SJCC 2016-215-   IN THE COURT OF JUDGE WAYNE MACK. SAID  MAY 19TH ORDER  REFERENCED  MOTION TO DISMISS   A PREVIOUS ‘DRIVING WITH A SUSPENDED LICENSE’ DERIVING FROM THE 2016 DUI BAC REFUSAL WHICH AS SAID WAS NOT INVALID UNDER TEXAS REFUSAL LAW SINCE THERE WAS NO PROBABLE CAUSE OF DUI BAC. 231 IN THE DEFENDANT AFTER AN INITIAL FALSE  ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE BY SJC DEP. SHERIFF JESSE SLAUGHTER ON THE EVENING OF APRIL 4TH, 2016.

 

AFTER A FALSE CONVICTION ON MARCH 13TH, IN THE COURT OF JUDGE WAYNE MACK FOR DRIVING WITH LICENSE INVALID, PREMISED UPON THE MC ASS DA  BEFORE SAID TRAIL VIOLATING APPELLANT’S XITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO A FAIR AND PUBLIC TRIAL BY NOT SUBMITTING THE STATE PROSECUTOR WITNESSES LIST TO THE APPELLANT BEFORE THE MARCH 13TH TRIAL TO BE VETTED,  MC ASS. DA ALLEGEDLY COUCHED TDPS HP OFFICER TO SAY SHE COULD NOT RECALL TAKING AN APPLICATION FOR A TDPS DRIVING LICENSE DATED, FILLED, AND SIGNED THAT DAY APPELLANT WAS STOPPED WITH PROBABLE CAUSE BY SAID  TESTIFYING OFFICE FROM APPELLANT THAT MAY HAVE EXONERATING THE DEFENDANT OF MALICIOUS INTENT IN DRIVING THAT DAY WITH LICENSE SUSPENDED IN THE MINDS OF THE JURY.

 

SAID MAY 19TH ORDER DENIED THE APPELLANT HIS VITH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO APPEAL SAID MARCH 13TH FALSE  IN JUDGE MACK’S COURT ON MARCH 13TH, 20017 FOR SAID GROUNDS: THE DEFENDANT PRO SE WAS NOT GIVEN THE STATE’S WITNESS LIST TO SEE AND VET.

 

THE LACK OF DUE DILIGENCE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT FACT BY THE MC LAW FIVE COURT IN TANDEM WITH TMCSD DEPUTIES TO DETECT LOVETT’S  WARRANT AS INVALID AND DELICT DENYING THE APPELLANT A FAIR AND UNPREJUDICED HEARING AT ARREST AND HIS TRANSPORTATION RIGHTS AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS THEREBY,  LEAD DIRECTLY TO THE APPELLANT’S MARCH 13, HOLY THURSDAY JAILING FOR THE HOLY WEEK TRIDIUM  AT THE MOUNTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT JAIL, CONROE, TEXAS WITHOUT BAIL TO BE EXPEDITED TO SJC JAIL ON MARCH 19TH,  TO SERVE TWICE THE LEGAL MAXIMUM SENTENCE OF 365 DAYS FOR 1ST DUI  WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PROBATION IN THE SJC JAIL BY ORDER OF SJCJ JOHN LOVETT ACTING AS PERSONA SOL PURSUANT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION IN THE COMMISSION OF AN ANTI CATHOLIC HATE CRIME.

 

 

 

LOVETT, ALLEGEDLY ALWAYS INTOXICATED IN COURT, HAS DENIED, NOT JUST THE APPELLANT, BUT STILL TO THIS DAY, AS SUCH, HUNDREDS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS  OF THEIR VITH AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS. THE MAY 19TH ORDER HAS ALLOWED LOVETT, DRUNK OR SOBER REGARDLESS, AND HIS ACCOMPLICES, THE TDPS, ET AL.  IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD UNABATED TO CONTINUE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION NOT ONLY AGAINST THE APPELLANT BUT AGAINST ALL IN TEXAS IN FACT AND IN DEED ALL SAID EVIDENCE IN THE APPELLANT’S APPEAL SHOWS.

 

EVERY YEAR, IN THE IMAGE AND LIKENESS OF THE APPELLANT, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS IN TEXAS ARE RENDERED UNKNOWINGLY VICTIMS OF THE TDPSCD/PFRAUD AND MADE VINCIBLE  IGNORANT AT ARREST BY NOT BEING READ  MIRANDA RIGHTS AND THE DIC-24 AT SIGNED REFUSAL OF HAVING THEIR BLOOD PIRATED FOR PROPS TO MANUFACTURE AND SUPPRESS EXONERATING EVIDENCE VIA THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS IN TEXAS EACH YEAR IN THE CONTEXT AND PROMOTION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD ARE SUBJECTED UNDER COLOR OF LAW TO VIOLATIONS OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: IST, IVTH, VTH, VITH, VIIITH, XVIIITH, XXITH, WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND STATE OF TEXAS RIGHTS-UNIVERSAL DENIAL OF THE RIGHT TO RETEST DNA/BAC BLOOD EVIDENCE IN THE CONTEXT AND PROMOTION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VIOLATING THE 2012  MICHAEL MORTON LAW TO RETEST DNA EVIDENCE(BAC BLOOD SAMPLES INCLUDED) “IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, AND NOT SOLELY CONVICTIONS. PEOPLE IN TEXAS  INTERNATIONAL LAW GENEVA CONVENTION HUMAN RIGHTS OF VIOLATED  BY TDPS “NO REFUSAL” POLICY  PIRATING OF BLOOD FROM VICTIMS TRIGGERING A FRAUDULENT TDPSCF LAB BAC SELF VALIDATING REPORT INCRIMINATING THEM IN PRACTICALLY EVERY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF +.15 BAC ENHANCING 1ST DUI TO A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR, INTIMIDATING DRACONIAN  SANCTIONS, AND RES IPSO DISQUALIFICATION OF DUI DEFENDANT FOR DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION.  THE GENEVA CONVENTION FORBIDS EXPERIMENTATION ON PRISONERS OF WAR- ALL BAC TESTING IS EXPERIMENTATION- THIS INCLUDES NEO PROHIBITION WAR ON ALCOHOL IN VIOLATION OF THE VXIIITH AMENDMENT IN THE CONTEXT AND PROMOTION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD, AS WELL AS SUBJECTING TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIMS TO IMPRISONED EXPOSURE TO FELLOW SUSPECT DUI/POM PRISONERS BEING TESTED LIKE THEM FOR TUBERCULOSIS BY THE STATE, EXPOSING THEM IN CLOSE CONFINEMENT POSSIBLY TO A DREADED DISEASE TUBERCULOSIS IN THE CONTEXT AND PROMOTION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.

 

THIS VIOLATION OF ALL SAID RIGHTS OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS EACH YEAR IN THE CONTEXT AND PROMOTION OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD TRIGGERS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DUI/POM INDICTMENTS BASED ON NON EXISTENT OFFENSE ADDRESSES IN SAN JACINTO COUNTY AND FALLACIOUS DATES OF OFFENSES (NOT JUST IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE), AND IN 99.7 % CASES TERMINATING IN GUILTY 1ST DUI CONVICTIONS  VIA PLEA “BARGAINS”  DEFRAUDING THE TDPSD/P REVENUE FRAUD VICTIM VIA MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSION OF POTENTIALLY EXONERATING BAC EVIDENCE IN EVERY CASE UNSCRUPULOUS SJC  ASS DA   LIARS, WHICH HAVE NON EXISTENT OFFENSE ADDRESSES IN SAN JACINTO COUNTY AND FALLACIOUS DATES OF OFFENSES,

99.7 OF THE SAME NOT KNOWING THEIR RIGHTS, NOT BEING READ THEIR RIGHTS,  THREATEN AND BULLIED BY  DISTRICT ATTORNEYS LYING TO THEM WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF LEGAL COUNSEL  PRESENT THAT THEIR BAC TEST FROM THE NOTORIOUSLY CORRUPT EVIDENCE TAMPERING TDPSCFL IS 99.7 ‘CONFIDENCE LEVEL’ A TOTAL LIE IN HUCKSTERING  TDPSCD/P VICTIMS TO RELINQUISH gOD GIVEN VITH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL WITH A JURY WITH NON MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED BAC TDPSCF LAB SPURIOUS EVIDENCE, OR ANY OTHER TDPSCF LAB MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED AS POTENTIALLY EXONERATING EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER,  AND PLEA BARGAIN  GUILTY, OR IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE JOHN LOVETT INTIMIDATES  IN COURT AND SJC ASS. DA MARK BOEMIO  OUTSIDE OF  COURT BY SPURIOUS PLEA “BARGAIN” WITH NO LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE DUI DEFENDANT ALLOWED , PLEAD GUILTY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONER’S DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD OR YOU WILL BE FALSELY CONVICTED BY TRIAL EITHER BY LIED TO JURY AND ..OR PREJUDICED CORRUPTED JUDGE IN 100% OF CASES BY MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED TDPSFC LAB SPURIOUS BAC TEST REPORT RESULTS TO TWICE THE LEGAL LIMIT  A  YEAR IN JAIL FOR 1STDUI AND  $10,000 DOLLAR FINE FOR REFUSAL TO BE DUPED AND DENIED JUSTICE AND RIGHT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD.  THIS HAPPENED IN THE APPELLANT’S CASE. THIS INJUSTICE WAS SUSTAINED BY THE MOCK MAY19TH, MC COURT LAW FIVE ORDER TO DISMISS FOR FOR JUSTICE CYNICAL RUSE IN TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE  IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE.

 

TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD  WILL NOT TAKE NO UNDER ANY CONDITION, AT ANY TIME, FOR ANY REASON FOR AN ANSWER, IN REGARDS TO PIRATING TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD’S VICTIMS BLOOD IN SPITE OF SIGNED  BAC REFUSAL SINE QUA NON.

 

RES IPSO, IGITUR, IF FOR REFUSAL OR ANY REASON WHAT SO EVER-INCLUDING NO PROBABLY CAUSE OF +.08 BAC- BLOOD SAMPLES WERE NOT PIRATED IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPSCD/P REVENUE FRAUD IN EVEN ONE CASE, LIKE THE APPELLANT’S CASE,  THIS  ENTIRE TDPS COMMISSIONERS’ MONEY SCAMMING CASH COW,  WOULD BE EXPOSED AND  COLLAPSED BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SUIT,  IF EVEN ONE BAC TEST CAME BACK BELOW .O8. AFTER ROUTINELY JAILING ALL DUI SUSPECTS ON INSTANTER IN TEXAS.  PRACTICALLY ALL OF THE BAC TEST REPORTS COME BACK AT .2. NOT ONE HAS EVER COME BACK BELOW BAC .15 FROM THE LAB AND WHEN OBVIOUS SPURIOUS TDPSFC LAB BAC REPORT WITH A REASONABLE DOUBT IS CONTESTED ONCE, AS IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE,   IN UNIVERSAL VIOLATION OF THE 2012 MICHAEL MORTON LAW THE TDPSCFL DOES NOT PERMIT RETESTING BY THEIR REPORT UNDERSIGNING BAC TDPSCF LAB BAC TECHNICIANS IN SUPPRESSION OF EXONERATING EVIDENCE. THE APPELLANT’S CASE IS REPRESENTATIVE IS THAT JUST ONE INSTANCE WHERE A TDPSCD/P VICTIM HAS FOUGHT FOR ALL VICTIMS AGAINST THE RAVAGES AND PIRATING OF NOTHING BUT A STATE WIDE MONEY MAKING SCAM BY THE TDPSCOMMISIONERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH LOCAL CRIMINAL JUDGES LIKE JOHN LOVETT AND THE SJC DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE

 

FAILURE BY THE COURT WITH JUDICIAL STANDING TO GRANT IN APPEAL APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS RE: MAY 19TH SPURIOUS COURT ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUDGEMENT AND SAID SAME COURT TO GRANT IN SAID APPEAL BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS THE APPELLANT’S AB INITIO  MAY 19TH HEARING MOTION TO DISMISS CHARGES  ET. AL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, JUST AS GOVERNOR ABBOTT’S OFFICE FAILURE TO CERTIFY AS GOVERNOR THE RES IPSO FACTO DISQUALIFICATION OF A JUDGE MOTION BY THE APPELLANT 2/23/17, IN A JUDICIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD BY SAID MOCK MAY 19TH COURT ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICE SUSTAINS JOHN LOVETT AND CO-CONSPIRATORS UNABATED BY THE MAY 19TH DISMISSAL FOR JUSTICE RUSE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE TO PERPETRATE THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD UNDER OF COLOR OF LAW DEFRAUDING, PIRATING THEIR BLOOD, AND AS DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF THE CONSTITUTION DESTROYING THE CIVIL AND GOD GIVEN RIGHTS OF OVER TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND IN TEXAS A YEAR, UNLAWFULLY CONFISCATING THEIR DRIVERS LICENCE  AND STATE LEGAL IDENTIFICATION, THE SAME THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAU.  THE 2003 SAFE DRIVING PROGRAM, BY SAID LAW WARRANT’S ONLY CDL, NOT CLASS C/M DRIVER’S LICENSE TO BE SUSPENDED  AND YET ALMOST 96% OF LICENSES CONFISCATED  ARE CLASS C, COMPLETELY OUTSIDE THE UNCONSTITUITIONAL 2003 LAW’S DOMAIN. DOUBLE JEOPARDY SURCHARGES ARE THEN EXTORTED UNDER THREAT OF JAILING FOR DRIVING WHILE LICENSE INVALID IF BEING SANCTIONED A SECOND TIME FOR THE SAME OFFENSE, $125. SURCHARGE IS NOT PAID TO THE TDPS IN ORDER TO HAVE SAID DRIVER’S LICENSE RETURNED AFTER THE AB INITIO SUSPENSION  SANCTION IS SERVED.

 

THE TEXAS PENAL STATE FOSTERED BY THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD, UTILIZES RURAL JAILS AS ANOTHER REVENUE STREAM.  THE SJC JAIL- BUILT BY SHERIFF HUMPY PARKER DURING “HUMPY’S” THREE DECADE LONG REIGN OF TERROR AND MURDER IN SJC IS A PRIME EXAMPLE IN THE APPELLANT’S CAUSE. THE SAME SJC COURT ENABLED HUMPY, ENABLES JOHN LOVETT TO JAIL THE APPELLANT IN SAID SAME SJCJ, AND IN SPITE OF THE MOCK MAY 19TH, 2017  MC COURT RUSE ORDER TO DISMISS FOR JUSTICES, VIA OUTSTANDING CASE WARRANT AND SPECIOUS PROBATION VIOLATION, BY COURT ORDER OF  JOHN LOVETT AND OF  WAYNE MACK UNABATED BY MOCK MAY 19TH COURT ORDER IS NONETHELESS IN TENT TO JAIL FALSELY THE APPELLANT PRO SE IN MCJ INDEFINITELY AND HUMPY’S SJC JAIL FOR 365 DAYS WITH NO PROBATION.

 

THE TDPS COMMISSIONERS DUI/POM REVENUE FRAUD MAKES MONEY VIA VICTIM’S  TAX PAYER MONEY  PAID TO COUNTY JAILS LIKE MCJ AND SJC IN JAILING INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY AMERICAN CITIZENS IN FALSE DUI AND POM ARREST WITH NO NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE (DUI) BEYOND FALLACIOUS TESTIMONY BY ARRESTING OFFICERS WHO OUNCE THEY ISSUE INSTANTER MUST YIELD IN EVERY CASE A GUILTY DUI CONVICTION AT +.15 BAC OR BE SUED PER CAUSAM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION I.E. MANUFACTURED AND SUPPRESSED BLOOD SAMPLE EVIDENCE AND FALSE JAILING.  BAC BLOOD SAMPLE “REFUSAL” IS PUNISHABLE BY 180

President Trump can Save America by Simple Executive Order to Print America First Money and End The Israel First and Only Federal Reserve Petro Dollar

War’s over in Syria for the Rotheschild Fed./Neo Con  Zionist Greater Is R Hell. Nothing can save the Rotheschild Zionists/Neo Con Communists and their anti gentile pirated Is R Hell  from annihilation now, This annihilation of Rotheschild owned Is R Hell and Bibi’s international terrorist Likud by Bibi’s imminent indictment  does not in anyway entail the annihilation of true Hebrews forced  by the Zionists to leave their homes in Europe during the Holocaust false flag terror hoax, just as the annihilation of the Soviet Union brought rebirth to Catholic Russia after Putin drove the remaining Rotheschild Oligarchs out of Russia  post Boris Yeltsin.  To save America from the same fate of ultimate annihilation as America’s  Fed. Reserve debt slave owners, all Israeli Americans and Neo Con Fed.  Zionists must be, like Isis in Syria, or as in  Russia,  brought to justice for their crimes and treason!  Especially by voting to oust Israel Firster Neo Cons in 2018 from Congress, and from the Supreme Court.The Neo Cons are Isis in America. It’s a simple fix, Russia and Iceland are shining examples- executive order by President Trump placing the power to print America’s currency back into the hands of Americans for the national benefit of Americans, not the Fed and Is R Hell,  By executive order Trump can take the printing of money out of  the hands of the Zionist culture of murder Satanic  Rotheschild banksters Fed. and put it back into the hands of America Firsters where the U.S. Constitution says printing money belongs rightfully.  American  currency for Americans by Americans, can be backed by gold and silver, but certainly not oil-the petro dollar – the Federal Reserve Dollar IOU without Reserves as world reserve currency is like Greater Is R Hell dead, Assad and Putin have put a stake through the Fed Reserve Dollar’s  inhuman debt enslaving black heart. Now Trump  can by one JFK esque  Executive Order 1000 money printing by the US Treasury Dept. of Silver Certificates (although it is American Labor, and Know How and all natural blessings by God  that truly is the backbone of America’s currency real worth) annihilate the Fed, or America will be annihilated along with her Rotheschild Zionist slave masters. This Constitutional executive order by President Trump in annihilating the Fed. will  also annihilate America’s  twenty trillion Federal Reserve Note slave debt based on Pentagon embezzlement by a Jewish Rabbi Comptroller for endless “war on terror” crimes against humanity perpetrated with American blood and money for the Satanic NWO/Greater Is R Hell.  Our Lady of Fatima 1917-2017 Triumph of Mary’s Immaculate Heart!  Deus Providebit!

The Truth about Donald Trump By Chuck Baldwin: Chuck Baldwin is Truly Prophetic!

Chuck Baldwin is truly Prophetic , towering, like a modern  day Jeremiah over  all  self  trumpeted ” American Christian Pastors,” false prophets of Baal , with their tacit support of contraception and divorce,  just like  most, but not every  American Catholic Bishop in 2017 and the non pope apostate Francis.    As a Catholic Priest and member of The Order of Preachers, I pray The Rosary  daily and offer The Holy Sacrifice of The Mass  for Chuck Baldwin’s deeper Christian conversion to The Catholic Faith: that Chuck Baldwin through the graceful hands  of Mary,  The Mother of God, in union with Her  Immaculate Heart and The Sacred Heart of Jesus come to know, like Baldwin’s hero Ron Paul  who has spoken at Fatima Center Conferences,  and to embrace Our Lady of Fatima’s unfolding promise of a Period of World Peace and second conversion renewal of Her Catholic Church, the Mystical Body of Christ, of whom Mary is a graceful  personification of,  as Mother of The Church Militant on Earth and Triumphant in Heaven. Amen!
Deus Providebit!

August 11, 2017

The truth about Donald Trump

 

 

Facebook Twitter Google+

By Chuck Baldwin

This column is written primarily in response to the way a host of televangelists, pastors, self-professing Christian talk show hosts, and Christian leaders are promoting Donald Trump as being a man of “bold Christian faith,” a “Bible-believing Christian,” a “modern Moses,” a “modern John The Baptist,” a “man for the Body of Christ,” a “REAL Christian,” etc., ad infinitum.

Forgive me, but I’ve heard all of this before: back when G.W. Bush was President. One noticeable distinction between Bush II and Trump I is Bush truly did often publically express a personal faith in Jesus Christ – not that that made him a better President. If you ask me, G.W. Bush was one of America’s very WORST presidents – his Christian profession notwithstanding.

In August of last year, I posted a list of the men I believe are America’s ten worst presidents on my Facebook page. If you are interested, here is my list:

Chuck Baldwin Facebook Post – America’s Ten Worst Presidents

But at no time has Donald Trump made a public profession of faith in Jesus Christ. A bunch of reverends have claimed Trump has made such a profession, but we have never heard it from Trump himself. And, again, I am not judging his presidency on his religious profession or lack thereof. I judge a civil magistrate – any civil magistrate – on his or her fidelity to the Constitution, Bill of Rights, and principles contained in the Declaration of Independence. That’s it. I really don’t care what the magistrate calls him or herself or what religious label he or she goes by or even what political party they say they represent. I’m merely pointing out the fact that all of the hype about Trump’s Christian profession by these sycophantic, pandering preachers is mere propaganda. And THAT bothers me. I am afraid that these Christian “leaders” are setting America up for another long, bloody war.

So, as a pastor with a national audience, it behooves me to say something.

Because G.W. Bush claimed to be a believer in Jesus Christ, he absolutely could do no wrong in the eyes of America’s evangelical pastors and Christians. When he took America into two unconstitutional, illegal, and immoral wars, Christians cheered; when he bombed innocent men, women, and children in the name of the “war on terror,” Christians cheered; when he created a brand new war doctrine – the preemptive war doctrine – Christians cheered; when he created a gigantic surveillance state and national police force, Christians cheered; when he filled his cabinet and administration with CFR globalists, Christians cheered; and when Bush partnered with Bill and Hillary Clinton in what can only be described as an international crime family, Christians, well, they looked the other way. Bush was a “born-again Christian,” so he could do no wrong.

Like I said, I’ve heard all of this before.

Christians (and conservatives) completely overlooked the Bush family connections to Saudi Arabia; the Bush family connections to international drug running; the Bush family connections to globalist war traders and profiteers; and the Bush family connections to German Nazism and Italian fascism. Bush was a “Christian” and could do no wrong.

And with Donald Trump in the White House, the televangelists, preachers, and Christian leaders are at it again. But here is what Christians are completely overlooking about Donald Trump.

*Donald Trump spent his entire adult life scamming people out of billions of dollars.

Trump’s companies have filed for bankruptcy seven times, taking billions of dollars out of people’s pockets in the process. When Trump filed bankruptcy over the Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City, New Jersey, in 1991, he was $3 billion in debt. Other Trump bankruptcies involving the loss (for other people) of multiple billions of dollars include The Trump Castle in Atlantic City, Trump Plaza and Casino in Atlantic City, the Plaza Hotel in New York City, Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts in Atlantic City, and Trump Entertainment Resorts in Atlantic City (once in 2009 and again in 2014). Trump actually brags about these bankruptcies as being “good business.” Speaking of his multiple bankruptcies, Trump gloated, “I don’t think it’s a failure; it’s a success.”

Doug Heller, the executive director of Consumer Watchdog, said Trump is the “most egregious, almost comical example” of the disparity between what the average American faces when going through bankruptcy and the “ease with which the very rich can move in and out of bankruptcy.”

Read this article to get the truth about the Trump bankruptcies:

The Truth About The Rise And Fall Of Donald Trump’s Atlantic City Empire

To this day, Trump brags about how “smart” he is as a businessman and shows absolutely no remorse over the billions and billions of dollars that he has bilked out of investors and partners. Shrewd, unscrupulous charlatans might view all of this as “good business,” but it is hardly the mark of a Christian – or even an honorable man.

*Donald Trump spent his entire adult life as a philandering playboy.

Most everyone knows that Donald Trump has been married three times and has had innumerable sexual affairs. When Trump was deposed in the divorce with his first wife, Ivana, he invoked the 5th Amendment right to keep silent about his relationship with “other women” 97 times. He had an affair with his second wife Marla Maples while he was still married to Ivana.

Regarding his current wife, Melania: “In 1999, shortly after they began dating, she participated in an on-air phone call with Trump and Howard Stern, as they discussed her chest, and whether she stole money from Donald’s wallet. When Stern asked to talk to ‘that broad in your bed,’ Trump put her on the line, and she spoke about how they had sex more than daily, and revealed that she was nearly nude. Stern replied, ‘I have my pants off already.’ Thanks to her relationship with Trump, she finally got her glossy-magazine spread – nearly naked in British GQ, handcuffed to a briefcase on a private jet, which Trump supplied. Managing the career moves of his companions was part of a pattern. While he was still married to Ivana, Trump pushed his girlfriend Marla Maples to pose nude in Playboy and reportedly negotiated the fee himself. (The deal fell through.)”

“As Donald’s celebrity ballooned with The Apprentice, Melania was asked to tolerate even more [humiliation]. His public interchanges with Howard Stern, which provided a kind of Greek chorus to their relationship, went from lewdly objectifying to grotesque. He agreed with Stern that his daughter Ivanka was ‘a piece of a##.’ He joked that if Melania were in a horrible, mangling car crash he’d still love her as long as the breasts remained intact. When asked by Stern whether he’d be up for ‘banging 24-year-olds,’ Trump eagerly assented. Subsequent accusations suggest similar improprieties.” (Source: Vanity Fair magazine, April, 2017)

Trump’s lifelong immoralities, infidelities, and sexcapades cannot even be discussed in polite company.

This is the cold, hard truth about who and what Donald Trump has been all of his life. The sleazy statement Trump was caught saying with Billy Bush during the presidential campaign last year was a revelation – not an aberration – of Trump’s personal life.

There is absolutely NOTHING to suggest that Donald Trump even comprehends what honesty, integrity, fidelity, or wholesomeness even looks like.

Oh, yes, and there is this:

*Donald Trump spent his entire business life consorting with international crime syndicates and the Jewish mafia.

One does not become an international casino tycoon without getting in bed with gangsters. The stories revealing Trump’s connections to global criminal enterprises are just now beginning to surface on the Internet. It’s not a pretty picture. If anything, the mainstream media has given Trump a pass so far on the real truth about Trump’s shady shenanigans. If Trump is removed from office, it will be because his past will have finally caught up with him – and because the globalists knew that they could use Trump and, due to his sordid past, take him down at any time. That’s how they work, folks.

Months ago, I posted on my Facebook page that I expected Mike Pence would assume the presidency at some point. I still think that Pence is the one the globalists really want in the White House right now but knew he could not get there without Trump. The only question in my mind is whether Donald Trump is a witting or unwitting participant in the globalists’ scheme.

Here was my Facebook post back on June 20:

Chuck Baldwin Facebook Post – Mike Pence

But I digress.

“Last week, the United States’ Ninth Circuit Court addressed an ongoing case involving the city of Almaty, one of Kazakhstan’s most outspoken critics, and millions of dollars in American real estate – some of which is tied directly to the U.S. president.

“As Courthouse News reported, the Ninth Circuit ‘revived a $300 million civil racketeering lawsuit’ from the city of Almaty against Viktor Khrapunov, the erstwhile Almaty mayor who, city representatives claim, invested millions in real estate abroad. The ruling reversed an earlier decision moving the lawsuit out of California, and allowed the suit to proceed in the state.”

“However, the relationship between Trump and Khrapunov may present the most serious, and certainly the strangest, wrinkle in relations between Astana and Washington moving forward. After all, despite the fact that Central Asian regimes have proven increasingly adept at pursuing governmental opponents abroad, they’ve never dealt with one who is a tenant of a building named after the sitting president.

“It remains unclear how Kazakhstani officials will approach their case against Khrapunov, especially now that it’s been re-opened in the United States. But the case suddenly presents not simply a fascinating development in post-Soviet autocracies’ pursuit of critics abroad, but one with the additional obstacle of linking directly to the American president. Trump may have recently described Kazakhstan’s economic progress as a ‘miracle,’ and he may be completely unaware of his role in the ongoing Kazakhstan-Khrapunov saga, but Astana – along with U.S.-Central Asian relations – is stepping into unknown territory. The president, as of early April, may have little interest in the region but, as we’ve seen, things can change swiftly when it involves Trump’s properties.”

See the report:

How Trump Is Connected To A Kazakh Corruption Scandal

And Trump’s association with Jewish mafia billionaires – among whom Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner (Ivanka’s husband) and his family belong – is easily documented. I’m talking about men such as Alexander Mashkevich, Tevfik Arif (not Jewish by birth but a strong Zionist), Felix Henry Sater, and Lev Avnerovich Leviev. Look them up for yourself. Jewish Zionist Wilbur Ross (Bilderberg), whom Trump appointed as Secretary of Commerce, was one of the Jewish billionaire Rothschild bankers who bailed Trump out of one of his bankruptcies.

This is the character of the man who sits in the White House. This is the character of the man who has his finger on the nuclear suitcase. This is the character of the man that our televangelists and Christian leaders are hailing as a “modern John the Baptist.” This is the character of the man that Christians are expecting to “save” America.

And now Trump has endorsed the establishment toady Luther Strange over Judge Roy Moore in the U.S. Senate race in Alabama. There is no finer Christian and no braver patriot than Roy Moore. I cannot think of another man in public office who more courageously took on the establishment than Judge Roy Moore. If Donald Trump truly wanted to drain the swamp in Washington, D.C., there is no man in the country who could better help him do it than Judge Moore. But Trump endorsed the establishment lackey Luther Strange. Regardless, Christian leaders, talk show hosts, and televangelists will still try to tell us what a wonderful Christian Donald Trump is. It is truly incredible!

Does all of this mean that Donald Trump cannot and will not make some good decisions as our President? No! Not at all. If it’s true that Trump ordered the CIA to stop supporting the Syrian rebels, that was a very good decision. And I applaud Trump’s decision to ban transgenders from the U.S. military. My only question is why he didn’t ban all homosexuals from military service at the same time. Since the days of George Washington, the U.S. military has always deemed that homosexuality was “incompatible” with military service. And indeed it is. So, why did Trump stop with transgenders? Why did Trump leave that Barack Obama order allowing homosexuals to serve in the military intact? And for that matter, why doesn’t Trump undo Obama’s order putting women in combat units and on submarines?

I am told by trusted, Christian attorney friends that Trump’s justice department is advocating against cases that provide legal preferences on the basis of aberrant sexual behavior. I applaud Trump for this. Trump has taken a public stand in support of the Second Amendment. I applaud Trump for this. I applaud Trump for making it difficult for manufacturing companies to relocate overseas and for keeping jobs in and bringing jobs back to the United States. I applaud Trump for drawing attention to our illegal immigration problem – albeit I strongly object to the way Trump inserted religion into the debate. And I don’t like walls. The Berlin Wall was not built to keep people out; it was built to keep people IN.

It is way too early to applaud Trump for his Supreme Court appointment Neil Gorsuch. Like so many of Trump’s appointees, Gorsuch is CFR. That makes it very doubtful that Gorsuch will be faithful to constitutional government. And, as I have said before, for the most part, Gorsuch is untested on the issues that really matter. So, we’ll see.

There are several other decisions Trump has made that I could likewise applaud. G.W. Bush made some good decisions too. But that doesn’t change who Bush was or who Trump is.

For Christian leaders, televangelists, and “Christian” talk show hosts to make Trump into a “modern John the Baptist” and refuse to deal with the true nature of this man we call President is the height of gullibility and irresponsibility.

Was Hillary Clinton any better? Of course not. Are people to be blamed for voting for Donald Trump? Not at all. Although I will say that if Christian leaders, pastors, conservative pundits, talk show hosts, etc., would be more honest and objective during the primary elections – and if they had a better understanding of constitutional government, liberty principles, sound money principles, Natural Law, etc. – we would not always be forced to choose between the “lesser of two evils” every general election. But, again, I digress.

Believe it or not, this column is not intended as an anti-Trump rant. Instead, it is an honest, truthful analysis of the man we elected President of the United States. It IS intended to be a wake-up call for my Christian brethren across the country to GET REAL.

The only way to truly gauge the character of a person is by their track record. The track record of Donald Trump is not pretty. But he is the President. Accordingly, we should support him when his decisions are constitutional, and we should oppose him when his decisions are not constitutional – and we should pray that he doesn’t take us into World War III. But the last thing in the world we should be doing – at least the last thing Christians should be doing – is making him out to be a “modern John the Baptist” and the like.

No wonder so many people think Christians are stupid.

P.S. We are still shipping our special printing of George Washington’s Farewell Address. Washington’s Farewell Address is a masterpiece. Almost every national problem America has faced and is facing is a direct result of forsaking the principles laid out for us in this remarkable address.

I consider George Washington’s Farewell Address to be the greatest political address ever delivered to the American people, which is why I am making this historic address available in this special printing. A return to the principles contained in Washington’s Farewell Address would most certainly restore our republic – even now.

This booklet is only $7.50 plus $2.50 shipping for Domestic orders. Order THREE books or more and receive FREE SHIPPING. (Free shipping only applies to domestic orders. International rates vary.)

Order George Washington’s Farewell Address here:

George Washington’s Farewell Address

© Chuck Baldwin

MORE CATHOLICS THAN JEWS DIED AT AUSCHWITZ BETWEEN 1941–1943

MORE CATHOLICS THAN JEWS DIED AT AUSCHWITZ BETWEEN 1941–1943

NEWS: COMMENTARY

Print Friendly and PDF

by Bradley Eli, M.Div., Ma.Th.  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  August 9, 2017    106 Comments

Original records show 3,000 more Catholics than Jews died in that period

Today’s the feast day of St. Teresa Benedicta of the Cross, the Jewish-born Edith Stein, who converted to Catholicism, became a Carmelite nun and died in the German prison camp of Auschwitz in 1942. Many people are unaware of original records, showing more Catholics than Jews died from 1941–1943 at this infamous Nazi prison camp built in Catholic Poland.

According to original records titled Death Books, which were captured at Auschwitz prison camp by Russians in 1945 and preserved at the British Library, almost 3,000 more Catholics died during this three-year period than Jews. The records show that of the 68,864 total people, who died there during that period, 31,814 were Catholic and 29,125 were Jews.

During that three-year period, 46 percent of the total number who died at Auschwitz were Catholic compared to 42 percent who were Jewish. Records for the period between 1944–1945 when the camp was liberated are not accounted for here. It’s telling to note, however, that the percentage of Catholics being killed at that location each year was actually increasing towards the end of that period.

During 1943, the last year records were kept in this original source, two and a half times more Catholics than Jews died at Auschwitz. Adding each journal entry for that year shows that 6,869 Jews died in this sector of the Holocaust compared to 16,960 Catholics, whose deaths were recorded that year in this original journal kept at Auschwitz.

American Patriot and Courageous Catholic, Sen. John Van DeCamp, The Franklin Scandal Author Has Died! R.I.P.

Former Nebraska State Senator John Van de Camp, 1990 author of THE FRANKLIN SCANDAL, a much decorated Vietnam Captain, credited with the organized resettlement of 2,800 orphans after the Vietnam War, died on July 27th, 2017 at an indigent Veterans’ Home unnoted and praised by so called Liberty Movement alternative media,  and The NWO Sionist Corporate Mass Media alike.The only article of John’s heroic life and recent death, not placed on the internet,  was by  Warren Buffet owned Omaha  “Weird Herald” (World Herald) stating “In later years, he (Van De Camp) drew criticism for issuing a memo that fanned rumors related to investigation of the failed Franklin Community Federal Credit Union.”  After naming names in The Franklin Scandal, and as an attorney Pro Bono defending Larry King’s Boys Town pirated child sex slave’s  falsely imprisoned and murdered by order of then President G.H. Bush by Bush/Clinton FBI/CIA,  Van De Camp was relentlessly destroyed by Buffett and Bush/Clinton in tandem professionally and politically until the day John died unnoticed an unsung hero. Buffet, who publicly  married Larry King, and G.H. Bush, who blackmailed  via CIA recording  Reagan Administration officials at King cocaine/child sex slave orgies in Chicago, D.C. and Miami are central criminal protagonists in The Franklin Scandal.   Van de Camp in this sol article about his life and death is mocked for his failed Banking Reform Legislation which would have curtailed, if passed, at least in Nebraska the 2008 Goldman Sachs/Buffet/Bush/Clinton contrived sub prime lone mortgage crash. Not highlighted was John’s almost single handed reform of the Nebraska DUI prosecution code, making DUI prosecution in Nebraska a model of respect for the IV, V, VI, Amendments, and constitutional BAC blood sample refusal, as well as writ of Habeas Corpus demanding BAC test be done with in two hours and the results by an independent lab be given immediately to DUI suspect as potentially exonerating evidence of BAC -.08 and -.15 and not suppressed as is done by the completely unconstitutional  Texas malicious prosecution DUI Code perpetrated under color of law against  millions in Texans in the fraudulent context of the Texas Department of Public Safety Commissioners’ DUI/POM Revenue Fraud. The War on Alcohol and Drugs, like the spurious War on Terror, is a central criminal ruse in the Bush/Clinton Penal State going back to Iran/Contra. Please remember this great American Patriot and Hero! Do not allow the memory of his life die with him! A truly Roman Catholic courageous adversary of Satanic Child Rape and Torture via  Church- Boys Town and Fr. Maciel Degolado pirated and the Corporate Fascist NWO State, John lived to 2017, the hundred anniversary of the 1917 Apparition of Mother Mary at Fatima to three shepherd children proclaiming a period of World Peace. John died at 75, like fellow American Hero Tex Mar, in 2017 having witnessed, along with dying John McCain, G.H. Bush, Brzezinski, David Rockefeller, Kissinger and Hilary the complete destruction of the bankster Zionist NWO in Syria at the hands of a resurrected Catholic Russia by Vladimir Putin, and perhaps unwittingly President Trump, an unfolding of The Third Secret, or Message of Fatima portending a Period of World Peace and Return to The Church if Russia is consecrated in a public ceremony to the Immaculate Heart of Mary in a public solemn ceremony in union with all the Catholic Bishop’s of the World at the same time, a mandate of the Sacred Heart of Jesus. Allegedly Putin, a devout Christian, asked non-pope Francis the P2 masonic illuminati apostate to consecrate Russia. Francis responded, give back Crimea to Soros fake Jew controlled Ukraine. Without the consecration by a true Pope Mary says Rome will be devastated for its loss of The Catholic Faith, and  attacked by gun and bow yielding terrorists, littered with untold corpses, and “a Bishop dressed in white, we thought was the Pope” will be killed fleeing catastrophe on a hill outside of Rome. Deus Providebit